Investigation of anion retention and cation exclusion effects for several C18 stationary phases.
When mobile-phase salt content is increased, cationic analytes often show increased retention. This effect is generally attributed to chaotropic or ion pairing effects. However, a cation exclusion mechanism could explain the same effects. In this study, experimental conditions were manipulated to enhance cation exclusion effects and reduce chaotropic/ion pairing effects by using (1) low ionic strength mobile phases to reduce electrostatic screening, (2) a buffer anion (dihydrogen phosphate) that exhibits minimal chaotropic/ion pairing effects, and (3) columns that show evidence of a weak positive charge. Urea was used as neutral void marker and glycinamide (in protonated form) as cationic void marker. It was assumed the difference in retention volumes between void markers would reflect an "excluded volume", inaccessible to cationic analytes. As ionic strength was lowered, it appeared as much as 80% of the pore volume became inaccessible to the glycinamide cation at the lowest ionic strength tested (1.4 mM). Three model cationic analytes showed retention loss approximately proportional to the excluded volume as ionic strength was decreased. This suggests that, under certain conditions, cation exclusion may become the dominant mechanism in mediating the retention of cationic analytes as the mobile-phase salt content is varied.
Loeser
Eric
E
Chemical and Analytical Development, Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, New Jersey 07936, USA. eric.loeser@novartis.com
Drumm
Patrick
P
D000838:Anions / Q000737:chemistry; D002412:Cations / Q000737:chemistry; D002852:Chromatography, Ion Exchange; D005998:Glycine / Q000031:analogs & derivatives / Q000737:chemistry; D009994:Osmolar Concentration; D016062:Porosity; D012492:Salts / Q000737:chemistry; D014508:Urea / Q000737:chemistry
D000838:Anions; D002412:Cations; D012492:Salts; C018556:glycine amide; D014508:Urea; D005998:Glycine