title: Resistant tennis elbow: shock-wave therapy versus percutaneous tenotomy.
abstract: Fifty-six patients who suffered from chronic persistent tennis elbow of more than six months duration were randomly assigned to two active treatment groups. Group 1 (n = 29) received high-energy extracorporeal shock wave treatment (ESWT; 1,500 shocks) at 18 kV (0.22 mJ/mm(2)) without local anaesthesia; group 2 (n = 27) underwent percutaneous tenotomy of the common extensor origin. Both groups achieved improvement from the base line at three weeks, six weeks, 12 weeks and 12 months post-intervention. The success rate (Roles and Maudsley score: excellent and good) at three months in the ESWT group was 65.5% and in the tenotomy group was 74.1%. ESWT appeared to be a useful noninvasive treatment method that reduced the necessity for surgical procedures.
authors.affiliation: Orthopaedics, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
authors.forename: Yasser A
authors.initials: YA
authors.lastname: Radwan
authors.forename: Gamal
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: ElSobhi
authors.forename: Walid S
authors.initials: WS
authors.lastname: Badawy
authors.forename: Ali
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Reda
authors.forename: Sherif
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Khalid
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D019220:High-Energy Shock Waves / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies; D019233:Retreatment; D013710:Tendons / Q000601:surgery*; D013716:Tennis Elbow / Q000601:surgery*; D055815:Young Adult