The laterality effect: myth or truth?
Tzelgov and colleagues [Tzelgov, J., Meyer, J., and Henik, A. (1992). Automatic and intentional processing of numerical information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 18, 166-179.], offered the existence of the laterality effect as a post-hoc explanation for their results. According to this effect, numbers are classified automatically as small/large versus a standard point under autonomous processing of numerical information. However, the genuinity of the laterality effect was never examined, or was confounded with the numerical distance effect. In the current study, I controlled the numerical distance effect and observed that the laterality effect does exist, and affects the processing of automatic numerical information. The current results suggest that the laterality effect should be taken into account when using paradigms that require automatic numerical processing such as Stroop-like or priming tasks.
Cohen Kadosh
Roi
R
Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience and Department of Psychology, University College London, London WC1N 3AR, UK. r.cohenkadosh@ucl.ac.uk
D000328:Adult; D001332:Automatism; D007839:Functional Laterality; D006801:Humans; D008433:Mathematics; D011930:Reaction Time; D012858:Size Perception