title: When there is no escape: the effects of natural enemies on native, invasive, and noninvasive plants.
abstract: An important question in the study of biological invasions is the degree to which successful invasion can be explained by release from control by natural enemies. Natural enemies dominate explanations of two alternate phenomena: that most introduced plants fail to establish viable populations (biotic resistance hypothesis) and that some introduced plants become noxious invaders (natural enemies hypothesis). We used a suite of 18 phylogenetically related native and nonnative clovers (Trifolium and Medicago) and the foliar pathogens and invertebrate herbivores that attack them to answer two questions. Do native species suffer greater attack by natural enemies relative to introduced species at the same site? Are some introduced species excluded from native plant communities because they are susceptible to local natural enemies? We address these questions using three lines of evidence: (1) the frequency of attack and composition of fungal pathogens and herbivores for each clover species in four years of common garden experiments, as well as susceptibility to inoculation with a common pathogen; (2) the degree of leaf damage suffered by each species in common garden experiments; and (3) fitness effects estimated using correlative approaches and pathogen removal experiments. Introduced species showed no evidence of escape from pathogens, being equivalent to native species as a group in terms of infection levels, susceptibility, disease prevalence, disease severity (with more severe damage on introduced species in one year), the influence of disease on mortality, and the effect of fungicide treatment on mortality and biomass. In contrast, invertebrate herbivores caused more damage on native species in two years, although the influence of herbivore attack on mortality did not differ between native and introduced species. Within introduced species, the predictions of the biotic resistance hypothesis were not supported: the most invasive species showed greater infection, greater prevalence and severity of disease, greater prevalence of herbivory, and greater effects of fungicide on biomass and were indistinguishable from noninvasive introduced species in all other respects. Therefore, although herbivores preferred native over introduced species, escape from pest pressure cannot be used to explain why some introduced clovers are common invaders in coastal prairie while others are not.
authors.affiliation: Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, 1156 High Street, EEB/EMS, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA. parker@biology.ucsc.edu
authors.forename: Ingrid M
authors.initials: IM
authors.lastname: Parker
authors.forename: Gregory S
authors.initials: GS
authors.lastname: Gilbert
mesh_terms: D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D000818:Animals; D044822:Biodiversity; D018533:Biomass; D017753:Ecosystem; D005247:Feeding Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D005658:Fungi / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000472:pathogenicity; D063245:Plant Development; D010944:Plants / Q000382:microbiology; D010945:Plants, Edible / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000382:microbiology; D011157:Population Dynamics; D012639:Seeds / Q000254:growth & development; D013045:Species Specificity