title: Women's views and outcomes of an educational intervention designed to enhance psychosocial support for women during pregnancy.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Identification of psychosocial issues in pregnant women by screening is difficult because of the lack of accuracy of screening tools, women's reluctance to disclose sensitive issues, and health care practitioner's reluctance to ask. This paper evaluates if a health professional education program, a new (ANEW) approach, improves pregnant women's ratings of care and practitioner's listening skills and comfort to disclose psychosocial issues.
  
  
  METHODS
  Midwives and doctors from Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Australia, were trained from August to December 2002. English-speaking women (<20 wks' gestation) were recruited at their first visit and mailed a survey at 30 weeks (early 2002) before and after (2003) the ANEW educational intervention. Follow-up was by postal reminder at 2 weeks and telephone reminder 2 weeks later.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Twenty-one midwives and 5 doctors were trained. Of the eligible women, 78.2 percent (584/747) participated in a pre-ANEW survey and 73.3 percent (481/657) in a post-ANEW survey. After ANEW, women were more likely to report that midwives asked questions that helped them to talk about psychosocial problems (OR 1.45, CI 1.09-1.98) and that they would feel comfortable to discuss a range of psychosocial issues if they were experiencing them (coping after birth for midwives [OR 1.51, CI 1.10-2.08] and feeling depressed [OR 1.49, 1.16-1.93]; and concerns relating to sex [OR 1.35, CI 1.03-1.77] or their relationships [OR 1.36, CI 1.00-1.85] for doctors).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The ANEW program evaluation suggests trends of better communication by health professionals for pregnant women and should be evaluated using rigorous methods in other settings.
authors.affiliation: Department of General Practice, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, University of Melbourne, and Mercy Hospital for Women, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
authors.forename: Kelsey
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Hegarty
authors.forename: Stephanie
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Brown
authors.forename: Jane
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Gunn
authors.forename: Della
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Forster
authors.forename: Cate
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Nagle
authors.forename: Belinda
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Grant
authors.forename: Judith
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Lumley
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D016001:Confidence Intervals; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D007318:Inservice Training / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D009035:Mothers / Q000523:psychology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D016017:Odds Ratio; D010358:Patient Participation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D017060:Patient Satisfaction / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011247:Pregnancy; D011369:Professional-Patient Relations; D015397:Program Evaluation; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000458:organization & administration; D012944:Social Support; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014739:Victoria / Q000453:epidemiology