title: Does middle hepatic vein omission in a right split graft affect the outcome of liver transplantation? A comparative study of right split livers with and without the middle hepatic vein.
abstract: Preservation of the middle hepatic vein (MHV) for a right split liver transplantation (SLT) in an adult recipient is still controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the graft and patient outcomes after liver transplantation (LT) using a right split graft, according to the type of venous drainage. From February 2000 to May 2006, 33 patients received 34 cadaveric right split liver grafts. According to the type of recipient pairs (adult/adult or adult/child), the right liver graft was deprived of the MHV or not. The first group (GI, n = 15) included grafts with only the right hepatic vein (RHV) outflow, the second (GII, n = 18) included grafts with both right and MHV outflows. The 2 groups were similar for patient demographics, initial liver disease, and donor characteristics. In GI and GII, graft-to-recipient-weight ratio (GRWR) was 1.2 +/- 0% and 1.6 +/- 0.3% (P < 0.05), and cold ischemia time was 10 hours 55 minutes +/- 2 hours 49 minutes and 10 hours 47 minutes +/- 3 hours 32 minutes, respectively (P = not significant). Postoperative death occurred in 1 patient in each group. Vascular complications included anastomotic strictures: 2 portal vein (PV), 1 hepatic artery (HA), and 1 RHV anastomotic strictures; all in GI. Biliary complications occurred in 20% and 22% of the patients, in GI and GII, respectively (P = not significant). There were no differences between both groups regarding postoperative outcome and blood tests at day 1-15 except for a significantly higher cholestasis in GI. At 1 and 3 yr, patient survival was 94% for both groups and graft survival was 93% for GI and 90% for GII (P = not significant). In conclusion, our results suggest that adult right SLT without the MHV is safe and associated with similar long-term results as compared with those of the right graft including the MHV, despite that early liver function recovered more slowly. Technical refinements in outflow drainage should be evaluated in selected cases.
authors.affiliation: Unité de transplantation hépatique-Fédération des Spécialités Digestives, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France. mustapha.adham@chu-lyon.fr
authors.forename: Mustapha
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Adham
authors.forename: Jérôme
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Dumortier
authors.forename: Amr
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Abdelaal
authors.forename: Pierre
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Sagnard
authors.forename: Catherine
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Boucaud
authors.forename: Olivier
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Boillot
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002648:Child; D005260:Female; D006084:Graft Rejection; D006085:Graft Survival / Q000502:physiology*; D006503:Hepatic Veins / Q000502:physiology / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D007902:Length of Stay; D008099:Liver / Q000098:blood supply* / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D008111:Liver Function Tests; D016031:Liver Transplantation / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods* / Q000473:pathology; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D016019:Survival Analysis; D016896:Treatment Outcome