title: [Venous thromboembolism associated with long-term use of central venous catheters in cancer patients].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Increased incidence of cancers and the development of totally implanted venous access devices that contain their own port to deliver chemotherapy will lead to a greater than before numbers of central venous catheter related thrombosis (CVCT). Medical consequences include catheter dysfunction and pulmonary embolism. Compared with lower extremity deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (3 d) and with non CVC associated thrombosis (5 d), CVCT is associated with an increased duration of hospitalisation (9 d). CVCT oftentimes leads to the need to replace such ports at an average cost of 4500 euros.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Vessel injury caused by the procedure of CVC insertion is the most important risk factor for development of CVCT. This event could cause the formation of a fresh thrombus, which is reversible in the large majority of patients. The incidence of CVC-related DVT assessed by venography has been reported to vary from 30 to 60% but catheter-related DVT in adult patients is symptomatic in only 5% of cases. The majority of patients with CVC-related DVT is asymptomatic or has non-specific symptoms: arm or neck swelling or pain, distal paresthesias, headache, congestion of subcutaneous collateral veins. In the case of clinical suspicion of CVC-related DVT, compressive ultrasonography (US), especially with Doppler and color imaging, currently is first used to confirm the diagnosis. The main criteria of color-Doppler US are visualization of mural thrombi or incompressibility of the veins. Consequently, contrast venography is reserved for clinical trials and difficult diagnostic situations. There is no consensus on the optimal management of patients with CVC-related DVT. Treatment of CVC-related VTE requires a 5- to 7-day course of adjusted-dose unfractionated heparin or LMWH followed by oral anticoagulants. Long-term LMWH that has been shown to be more effective than oral anticoagulant in cancer patients with lower limb DVT could be used in these patients. The optimal duration of oral anticoagulation treatment for CVC-related DVT is unknown, but patients with active cancer should be treated for at least 6 months or indefinitely.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The efficacy and safety of pharmacologic prophylaxis for CVC related thrombosis is not established. Additional studies performed in high risk populations are needed to define if LMWH or oral anticoagulation is indicated in this clinical setting.
authors.affiliation: Service de Médecine Interne Oncologique, Hôpital Desgenettes, 108, boulevard Pinel, 69003 Lyon, France. pdebourdeau@yahoo.fr
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Debourdeau
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Zammit
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Pavic
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Bensaid
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Farge-Bancel
mesh_terms: D002405:Catheterization, Central Venous / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D004867:Equipment Design; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy*; D013923:Thromboembolism / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000209:etiology*