The context influences doctors' support of shared decision-making in cancer care.
Most cancer patients in westernised countries now want all information about their situation, good or bad, and many wish to be involved in decision-making. The attitudes to and use of shared decision-making (SDM) by cancer doctors is not well known. Australian cancer clinicians treating breast, colorectal, gynaecological, haematological, or urological cancer were surveyed to identify their usual approach to decision-making and their comfort with different decision-making styles when discussing treatment with patients. A response rate of 59% resulted in 624 complete surveys, which explored usual practice in discussing participation in decision-making, providing information, and perception of the role patients want to play. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of use of SDM. Most cancer doctors (62.4%) reported using SDM and being most comfortable with this approach. Differences were apparent between reported high comfort with SDM and less frequent usual practice. Multivariate analysis showed that specialisation in breast or urological cancers compared to other cancers (AOR 3.02), high caseload of new patients per month (AOR 2.81) and female gender (AOR 1.87) were each independently associated with increased likelihood of use of SDM. Barriers exist to the application of SDM by doctors according to clinical situation and clinician characteristics.
Shepherd
H L
HL
Medical Psychology Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Blackburn Building, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia. heathers@med.usyd.edu.au
Tattersall
M H N
MH
Butow
P N
PN
D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008511:Medicine; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*; D010358:Patient Participation; D012737:Sex Factors; D013038:Specialization