Illusions of competence and overestimation of associative memory for identical items: evidence from judgments of learning.
The relation between subjects' predicted and actual memory performance is a central issue in the domain of metacognition. In the present study, we examined the influence of item similarity and associative strength on judgments of learning (JOLs) in a cued recall task. We hypothesized that encoding fluency would cause a foresight bias, so that subjects would overestimate recall of identical pairs (scale-scale), as compared with strong associates (weight-scale) or unrelated pairs (mask-scale). In Experiment 1, JOLs for identical word pairs were higher than those for related and unrelated pairs, but later recall of identical pairs was lower than recall of related pairs. In Experiment 2, the effect of encoding fluency (inferred from self-paced study time) was examined, and a similar pattern of results was obtained, with subjects spending the least amount of time studying identical pairs. We conclude that overconfidence for identical pairs reflects an assessment of item similarity when JOLs are made, despite associative strength being a better predictor of later retrieval.
Castel
Alan D
AD
Department of Psychology, University of California, Los Angeles, California 90095-1563, USA. castel@psych.ucla.edu
McCabe
David P
DP
Roediger
Henry L
HL
D001076:Aptitude; D006801:Humans; D007088:Illusions; D007600:Judgment; D011939:Mental Recall; D010153:Paired-Associate Learning; D011214:Practice, Psychological; D012660:Semantics