What is the future of peer review? Why is there fraud in science? Is plagiarism out of control? Why do scientists do bad things? Is it all a case of: "all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing"?
Peer review is an essential component of the process that is universally applied prior to the acceptance of a manuscript, grant or other scholarly work. Most of us willingly accept the responsibilities that come with being a reviewer but how comfortable are we with the process? Peer review is open to abuse but how should it be policed and can it be improved? A bad peer review process can inadvertently ruin an individual's career, but are there penalties for policing a reviewer who deliberately sabotages a manuscript or grant? Science has received an increasingly tainted name because of recent high profile cases of alleged scientific misconduct. Once considered the results of work stress or a temporary mental health problem, scientific misconduct is increasingly being reported and proved to be a repeat offence. How should scientific misconduct be handled--is it a criminal offence and subject to national or international law? Similarly plagiarism is an ever-increasing concern whether at the level of the student or a university president. Are the existing laws tough enough? These issues, with appropriate examples, are dealt with in this review.
Triggle
Chris R
CR
School of Medical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. chris.triggle@rmit.edu.au
Triggle
David J
DJ
D016265:Conflict of Interest / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006801:Humans; D010380:Peer Review / Q000639:trends*; D010506:Periodicals as Topic / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D015714:Plagiarism; D015871:Scientific Misconduct