Validity and reliability of ear landmarks as reference points for cephalometric analysis.
OBJECTIVE
A cephalometric analysis was designed to determine whether the external ear is a suitable reference structure for the superimposition of cephalometric analysis.


METHODS
The sample consisted of 21 orthodontic patients with an average age of 16.5 years. Tracings of pretreatment and posttreatment cephalograms were superimposed on the cranial base. The landmarks on the ear, namely upper ear (UE), posterior ear (PE), and ear point (Ea), as well as the planes, namely UE-PE and EaP were defined to depict the position of the ear. The differences in these parameters between 2 timepoints were identified to indicate the stability of the ear position relative to the craniofacial complex. The paired t tests were used to evaluate the significance of displacement of these landmarks and planes at the 95% confidence interval.


RESULTS
The results showed that the angulation between EaP and SN showed no difference between pre- and posttreatment (mean, 0.000 degrees) and the angulation between E-line and SN changed very little (mean, 0.095 degree). However, the change in linear distance between S and N was significant (mean, 1.19 mm; P <.01).


CONCLUSIONS
It is suggested that the ear and its related landmarks are reliable and feasible reference structures or points for cephalometric analysis.
Chutimanutskul
Wanjira
W
Faculty of Dentistry, Sydney Dental Hospital, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Geenty
Joseph P
JP
Shen
Gang
G
Darendeliler
M Ali
MA
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D002508:Cephalometry / Q000379:methods*; D016001:Confidence Intervals; D004431:Ear, External / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011859:Radiography; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012886:Skull / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D013997:Time Factors