[Anterior chamber versus posterior chamber phakic IOLs].
At a time when some of the limitations of photoablation have been defined, such as worry concerning secondary ectasia, a renewed interest in phakic implantation has arisen. This is driven by the goal of avoiding correcting high ametropia with LASIK and is based on the development of soft foldable biomaterials. When all phakic IOLs are in front of the natural lens, two varieties of lenses can be distinguished, depending on whether it is located in the anterior or posterior chamber. The various models available in 2006 and those under current evaluation are reviewed. We do not report details of clinical studies that vary in cohort size and follow-up. The advantages and limitations are discussed for each type of phakic IOL. Adequate although not exclusive indications are deduced. There is no phakic lens that has proved to be superior to the others in terms of safety. All have the ability to provide a visual benefit with a gain in best corrected visual acuity. The difference is based on anatomical effects, requiring long-term follow-up in the evaluation of angles, lens, iris, and endothelium.
Cochener
B
B
Service d'Ophtalmologie, CHU, Brest. beatrice.cochener-lamard@chu-brest.fr
D000869:Anterior Eye Segment / Q000601:surgery*; D001672:Biocompatible Materials; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D019654:Lens Implantation, Intraocular; D018918:Phacoemulsification; D012029:Refraction, Ocular; D054140:Refractive Surgical Procedures; D014792:Visual Acuity
D001672:Biocompatible Materials