title: [Medico-legal opinions in cases for annulment of testament. Part I. Characteristics of investigative material. Characteristics of testators].
abstract: A very important issue in preparing medico-legal opinions is the establishment whether the devisor had the ability to bequeath at the date of preparing a testament. The subsequent loss of the ability of bequeathing does not have any impact on execution of the previously prepared testament. Experts who pass opinions in testament cases evaluate: 1) the testament itself and the circumstances of its preparation, excluding, however, the reliability of records, 2) statements obtained while interrogating witnesses (descriptions of daily life, motivation to bequeath), 3) medical records (files, case histories, discharge records). The investigative material consisted of judicial files in 73 testament cases referred to the Chair and Department of Forensic Medicine (CDFM), University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, by courts from all over Poland in the period 1990-2005 for formulation of medico-legal opinions based on these documents. In 63.0% of cases, CDFM in Poznań was the first opinionating institution; in the remaining instances, previous medico-legal opinions had been given elsewhere; in six cases they were antagonistic. The investigative material included a predominant percentage (75.2%) of ordinary testaments (made before a notary and oligraphic) as opposed to 22% of informal testaments (oral only). Although in the majority of cases (67.2%) only one testament was drawn up, there were also instances (2.7%) where the devisor prepared as many as five testaments. The length of devisors survival following the drawing up of the final testament was generally short. In total, testaments not only in the oral form, but also made before a notary, were prepared by chronically ill individuals presenting with marked clinical symptoms, what was perceived by their family and caregivers as a sign of the imminent death. Hence, the testaments were often drawn up in a hospital room or in a notary office where the patient was taken between consecutive hospitalizations.
authors.affiliation: Katedry Medycyny Społecznej i Katedry i Zakładu Medycyny Sadowej Akademii Medycznej im. Karola Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu. phe@amp.edu.pl
authors.forename: Jerzy T
authors.initials: JT
authors.lastname: Marcinkowski
authors.forename: Aneta
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Klimberg
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D005104:Expert Testimony / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D005260:Female; D005554:Forensic Medicine / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008297:Male; D008499:Medical Records / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D016743:Mental Competency / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D008875:Middle Aged; D019989:Persons with Intellectual Disabilities / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D011044:Poland; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D014918:Wills / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*