Probabilistic analysis of peri-implant strain predictions as influenced by uncertainties in bone properties and occlusal forces.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of variability in bone properties and loading on peri-implant crestal and cancellous bone strains using a probabilistic approach, in combination with finite element (FE) analysis.


METHODS
Oblique occlusal loading was applied to a single endosseous implant embedded in a two-dimensional (2-D) FE model of a premolar section of a mandible. Perfect bonding was assumed at all interfaces. Five independent parameters (cortical bone thickness (T), cortical (ECORT) and cancellous (ECANC) bone Young's moduli, and vertical (FVERT) and horizontal (FHOR) occlusal forces) were assigned statistical distributions based on data in the literature. Two cancellous bone distribution models were examined, one with a lower mean and range (LM) and the second with a higher mean and range (HM) of cancellous bone Young's modulus values. Sets of randomly chosen values for the five parameters were selected from the distributions and FE analyses were performed for all randomly selected sets.


RESULTS
In the LM model, 50% of the cases experienced hyper-physiologic peri-implant crestal strains in the region of commonly reported saucerization, compared with about 25% of the cases in the HM model. Relative probabilistic sensitivities (%) of bone strains to the independent input parameters (T, ECORT, ECANC, FVERT and FHOR) were as follows: 29, 11, 30, 13, and 17 for the LM model, and 17, 11, 35, 21, and 15 for the HM model, respectively.


CONCLUSIONS
Probabilistic analyses of FE models suggest that up to twice as many cases in the LM distribution may be at risk of saucerization as compared with the HM distribution model. Although based on hypothetical distribution values and the limitations inherent to a 2-D analysis, this probabilistic study demonstrated that FE models are very sensitive to the often arbitrarily assigned values for cancellous bone Young's modulus, and also to values used for cortical bone thickness, when the cancellous bone modulus is low.
Petrie
Cynthia S
CS
Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO 64108, USA. petriec@umkc.edu
Williams
John L
JL
D000539:Alveolar Process / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology*; D001641:Bicuspid; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D001732:Bite Force; D003724:Dental Arch / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology; D015921:Dental Implants; D003764:Dental Materials / Q000737:chemistry; D004548:Elasticity; D020342:Finite Element Analysis; D006801:Humans; D008334:Mandible / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology*; D008954:Models, Biological; D016348:Osseointegration / Q000502:physiology; D011336:Probability; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D014025:Titanium / Q000737:chemistry
D015921:Dental Implants; D003764:Dental Materials; D014025:Titanium