Relations among functional systems in behavior analysis.
This paper proposes that an organism's integrated repertoire of operant behavior has the status of a biological system, similar to other biological systems, like the nervous, cardiovascular, or immune systems. Evidence from a number of sources indicates that the distinctions between biological and behavioral events is often misleading, engendering counterproductive explanatory controversy. A good deal of what is viewed as biological (often thought to be inaccessible or hypothetical) can become publicly measurable variables using currently available and developing technologies. Moreover, such endogenous variables can serve as establishing operations, discriminative stimuli, conjoint mediating events, and maintaining consequences within a functional analysis of behavior and need not lead to reductionistic explanation. I suggest that explanatory misunderstandings often arise from conflating different levels of analysis and that behavior analysis can extend its reach by identifying variables operating within a functional analysis that also serve functions in other biological systems.
Thompson
Travis
T
Autism Program, Department of Pediatrics, MMC 486 Mayo, University of Minnesota School of Medicine, 420 Delaware, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA. thomp199@umn.edu
D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D011589:Psychology, Experimental / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*