Parallel approaches to composite production: interfaces that behave contrary to expectation.
This paper examines two facial composite systems that present multiple faces during construction to more closely resemble natural face processing. A 'parallel' version of PRO-fit was evaluated, which presents facial features in sets of six or twelve, and EvoFIT, a system in development, which contains a holistic face model and an evolutionary interface. The PRO-fit parallel interface turned out not to be quite as good as the 'serial' version as it appeared to interfere with holistic face processing. Composites from EvoFIT were named almost three times better than PRO-fit, but a benefit emerged under feature encoding, suggesting that recall has a greater role for EvoFIT than was previously thought. In general, an advantage was found for feature encoding, replicating a previous finding in this area, and also for a novel 'holistic' interview.
Frowd
Charlie D
CD
Department of Psychology, University of Central Lancashire, Preston PRI 2HE, UK. cfrowd@uclan.ac.uk
Bruce
Vicki
V
Ness
Hayley
H
Bowie
Leslie
L
Paterson
Jenny
J
Thomson-Bogner
Claire
C
McIntyre
Alexander
A
Hancock
Peter J B
PJ
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D005145:Face / Q000502:physiology*; D005149:Facial Expression; D005260:Female; D044707:Forensic Sciences / Q000379:methods*; D005556:Form Perception; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall; D008875:Middle Aged; D010363:Pattern Recognition, Automated / Q000379:methods*; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D010551:Personality; D010781:Photography; D012984:Software; D006113:United Kingdom; D014584:User-Computer Interface; D014741:Video Recording