title: [The prospective comparison of the clinical effectiveness and the complication rate of retropubic (IVS-02) and transobturator (IVS-04) midurethral slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence].
abstract: The prospective comparison of the clinical effectiveness and the complication rate of retropubic (IVS-02) and transobturator (IVS-04) midurethral slings in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of this study was the prospective comparison of clinical efficacy and safety of retropubic (IVS-02) and transobturator suburethral tape techniques (IVS-04) in the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence.
  
  
  METHODS
  From January 2003 to June 2004, 145 patients with uro-dynamically proven stress urinary incontinence underwent surgical treatment (IVS-02 or IVS-04). During pretreatment work-up, all patients had under-gone full clinical and urodynamic evaluation. Patients with mixed, urge incontinence and the advanced urogenital prolapse (POPQ scale > 2) were excluded from the study.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Patients clinical characteristics and urodynamic parameters were comparable between the analyzed groups. At one year follow-up, 122 patients (61 in each group) were evaluated in terms of clinical efficacy of the procedure. The total cure (78.7% in IVS-02 vs 70.5% in IVS-04), the improvement (14.7% vs 21.3%) and the failure rates (6.6% vs 8.2%) were similar in both analyzed groups, chi2 = 0.58; (p = 0.75).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The transobturator route for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence appears to be as effective as the retropubic one at one year follow-up. Moreover, the shorter operation time and no need to perform cystoscopy during the surgery make the transoburator route a very attractive alternative to retropubic approach.
authors.affiliation: II Katedra i Klinika Ginekologii, Akademii Medycznej w Lublinie. rechbergt@yahoo.com
authors.forename: Tomasz
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Rechberger
authors.forename: Aneta
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Adamiak
authors.forename: Katarzyna
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Jankiewicz
authors.forename: Paweł
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Skorupski
authors.forename: Andrzej
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Wróbel
authors.forename: Jacek
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Tomaszewski
authors.forename: Konrad
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Futyma
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D019060:Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures; D011446:Prospective Studies; D019919:Prosthesis Implantation; D053825:Suburethral Slings; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014521:Urethra / Q000601:surgery*; D014550:Urinary Incontinence, Stress / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000601:surgery*; D014563:Urodynamics; D013520:Urologic Surgical Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D016387:Women's Health