Physicians' intentions and use of three patient decision aids.
BACKGROUND
Decision aids are evidence based tools that assist patients in making informed values-based choices and supplement the patient-clinician interaction. While there is evidence to show that decision aids improve key indicators of patients' decision quality, relatively little is known about physicians' acceptance of decision aids or factors that influence their decision to use them. The purpose of this study was to describe physicians' perceptions of three decision aids, their expressed intent to use them, and their subsequent use of them.


METHODS
We conducted a cross-sectional survey of random samples of Canadian respirologists, family physicians, and geriatricians. Three decision aids representing a range of health decisions were evaluated. The survey elicited physicians' opinions on the characteristics of the decision aid and their willingness to use it. Physicians who indicated a strong likelihood of using the decision aid were contacted three months later regarding their actual use of the decision aid.


RESULTS
Of the 580 eligible physicians, 47% (n = 270) returned completed questionnaires. More than 85% of the respondents felt the decision aid was well developed and that it presented the essential information for decision making in an understandable, balanced, and unbiased manner. A majority of respondents (>80%) also felt that the decision aid would guide patients in a logical way, preparing them to participate in decision making and to reach a decision. Fewer physicians (<60%) felt the decision aid would improve the quality of patient visits or be easily implemented into practice and very few (27%) felt that the decision aid would save time. Physicians' intentions to use the decision aid were related to their comfort with offering it to patients, the decision aid topic, and the perceived ease of implementing it into practice. While 54% of the surveyed physicians indicated they would use the decision aid, less than a third followed through with this intention.


CONCLUSIONS
Despite strong support for the format, content, and quality of patient decision aids, and physicians' stated intentions to adopt them into clinical practice, most did not use them within three months of completing the survey. There is a wide gap between intention and behaviour. Further research is required to study the determinants of this intention-behaviour gap and to develop interventions aimed at barriers to physicians' use of decision aids.
Graham
Ian D
ID
Ottawa Health Research Institute, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada. igraham@ohri.ca
Logan
Jo
J
Bennett
Carol L
CL
Presseau
Justin
J
O'Connor
Annette M
AM
Mitchell
Susan L
SL
Tetroe
Jacqueline M
JM
Cranney
Ann
A
Hebert
Paul
P
Aaron
Shawn D
SD
D000328:Adult; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002170:Canada; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003657:Decision Making; D020000:Decision Support Systems, Clinical / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D005194:Family Practice / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005260:Female; D005853:Geriatrics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D006801:Humans; D033182:Intention; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012138:Respiratory Therapy / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires