A comparative life cycle assessment of petroleum and soybean-based lubricants.
A comparative life cycle assessment examining soybean and petroleum-based lubricants is compiled using Monte Carlo analysis to assess system variability. Experimental data obtained from an aluminum manufacturing facility indicate significantly less soybean lubricant is required to achieve similar or superior performance. With improved performance and a lower use rate, a transition to soybean oil results in lower aggregate impacts of acidification, smog formation, and human health from criteria pollutants. Regardless of quantity consumed, soybean-based lubricants exhibit significant climate change and fossil fuel use benefits; however, eutrophication impacts are much greater due to non-point nutrient emissions. Fundamental tradeoffs in the carbon and nitrogen cycles are addressed in the analysis, demonstrating that a transition to soybean oil may result in climate change benefits at the expense of regional water quality.
Miller
Shelie A
SA
School of the Environment, Environmental Engineering and Science, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina, USA. millers@clemson.edu
Landis
Amy E
AE
Theis
Thomas L
TL
Reich
Ronald A
RA
D000535:Aluminum; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources; D007221:Industry; D008153:Lubrication; D009010:Monte Carlo Method; D010578:Petroleum / Q000032:analysis*; D013025:Glycine max / Q000737:chemistry*
D010578:Petroleum; D000535:Aluminum