Aromatase inhibitors--socioeconomical issues.
With costs of health care in general and for cancer therapy in particular escalating due to implementation of novel compounds, there is an increasing focus on therapy costs in most countries. A common way of assessing therapeutic utility versus cost is by assessing cost per additional life year gained or cost per additional quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained with a novel therapy. While endocrine therapy in general is associated with low costs, the fact that aromatase inhibitors are administered over several years to each patient in the adjuvant setting, together with the substantial number of postmenopausal breast cancer patients that are candidates for adjuvant treatment with aromatase inhibitors, advocates critical examination of cost-utilities related to implementation of such therapy in the adjuvant setting. While cost-utility estimates for treatment with aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant setting look favorable, the estimates are sensitive to variations with respect to long-term benefits but also side effects. For patient groups with a low-risk of relapse but also patients with a limited life expectancy due to high age, cost-utility estimates may exceed the upper limits generally proposed for costs per quality-adjusted life year gained.
Lønning
Per E
PE
Section of Oncology, Institute of Medicine, University of Bergen, Department of Oncology, Haukeland Univeristy Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway. per.lonning@helse-bergen.no
Geisler
Jürgen
J
D000277:Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic / Q000627:therapeutic use; D047072:Aromatase Inhibitors / Q000191:economics* / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000191:economics / Q000473:pathology; D004703:Endocrine System / Q000187:drug effects; D006801:Humans; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D012957:Societies, Pharmaceutical / Q000191:economics*
D000277:Adjuvants, Pharmaceutic; D047072:Aromatase Inhibitors