Pigeons may not use dual coding in the radial maze analog task.
Using a radial maze analog task, T. R. Zentall, J. N. Steirn, and P. Jackson-Smith (1990) found evidence that when a delay was interpolated early in a trial, pigeons coded locations retrospectively, but when the delay was interpolated late in the trial, they coded locations prospectively (support for a dual coding hypothesis). In Experiment 1 of the present study, the authors replicated the original finding of dual coding. In Experiments 2 and 3, they used a 2-alternative test procedure that does not require the assumption that pigeons' choice criterion, which changes over the course of the trial, is the same on delay and control trials. Under these conditions, the pigeons no longer showed evidence for dual coding. Instead, there was some evidence that they showed prospective coding, but a more parsimonious account of the results may be that the delay produced a relatively constant decrement in performance at all points of delay interpolation. The original finding of dual coding by Zentall et al. might have been biased by more impulsive choices early in control trials but not in delay trials and by a more stringent choice criterion late in delay trials.
DiGian
Kelly A
KA
Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506-0044, USA.
Zentall
Thomas R
TR
D000818:Animals; D001288:Attention; D002755:Choice Behavior; D010856:Columbidae; D003216:Conditioning, Operant; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D033182:Intention; D018782:Maze Learning; D011939:Mental Recall; D009949:Orientation; D011340:Problem Solving; D012153:Retention, Psychology