Philosophy of biology: about the fossilization of disciplines and other embryonic thoughts.
This paper focuses on a running dispute between Werner Callebaut's naturalistic view and Filip Kolen and Gertrudis Van de Vijver's transcendentalist view on the nature of philosophy of biology and the relation of this discipline to biological sciences. It is argued that, despite differences in opinion, both positions agree that philosophy of biology's ultimate goal is to 'move' biology or at least be 'meaningful' to it. In order to make this goal clear and effective, more is needed than a polarizing debate which hardly touches upon biology. Therefore, a redirection in discussion is suggested towards a reflection on the possibilities of incorporating philosophy in interdisciplinary research, and on finding concrete research questions which are of interest both to the philosopher and to the biologist.
Van Speybroeck
Linda
L
Department of Philosophy and Moral Science, Ghent University, Blandijnberg 2, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. linda.vanspeybroeck@UGent.be
D000818:Animals; D001690:Biological Science Disciplines / Q000639:trends; D001695:Biology / Q000639:trends*; D005544:Forecasting; D006801:Humans; D033183:Interdisciplinary Communication; D019368:Nature; D010684:Philosophy; D012106:Research