Pure laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in the management of prostate cancer.
BACKGROUND
Until recently, open radical prostatectomy was the only approach for the surgical management of prostate cancer. Laparoscopy is now increasingly used as an alternative approach. The procedure can be performed directly or with robot assistance.


METHODS
We review the relevant literature regarding oncologic and functional outcomes with laparoscopic surgery in the management of localized prostate cancer.


RESULTS
Oncologic and functional outcomes are similar between open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Pure laparoscopic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy result in less blood loss and shorter convalescence. Costs associated with the initial investment, disposables, and maintenance of the robot system are higher than for pure laparoscopic prostatectomy.


CONCLUSIONS
Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, either pure or robotic, is becoming the preferred approach for the surgical management of localized prostate cancer. Oncologic and functional outcomes are similar to the open approach.
Pow-Sang
Julio M
JM
Genitourinary Oncology Program, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. julio.powsang@moffitt.org
Velasquez
Juan
J
Myers
Michael D
MD
Rodriguez
Alejandro R
AR
Kang
Loveleen C
LC
D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D011468:Prostatectomy / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D012371:Robotics / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D016896:Treatment Outcome