When to respond? And how much? Temporal control and response output on mixed-fixed-interval schedules with unequally probable components.
Rats were trained on mixed-fixed-interval (FI) schedules, with component FIs of 30 and 60s. The probability of reinforcement according to FI 30s varied between conditions, across values of 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7 and 0.9. When response rate in the 60s intervals was measured, separate response peaks, one close to 30s, the other at 60s, could be identified when the probability of reinforcement at 30s was 0.3 or greater. Nonlinear regression found that the location of the earlier peak was always close to 30s, that the coefficient of variation of the response functions at 30 and 60s were unaffected by reinforcement probability, but that the 30s component appeared to be timed slightly more precisely than the 60s one. Response rate at around 30s increased with increasing probability of reinforcement according to FI 30s, but responding at 60s was unaffected by reinforcement probability. The data are discussed with respect to a number of contemporary models of animal timing (scalar expectancy theory, the Behavioural Theory of Timing and the Learning to Time model), and a recent account of response output on FI-like schedules.
Whitaker
S
S
School of Psychology, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.
Lowe
C F
CF
Wearden
J H
JH
D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D008297:Male; D051381:Rats; D012055:Reinforcement Schedule; D012054:Reinforcement, Psychology; D013998:Time Perception