Contrast and assimilation in motion perception and smooth pursuit eye movements.
The analysis of visual motion serves many different functions ranging from object motion perception to the control of self-motion. The perception of visual motion and the oculomotor tracking of a moving object are known to be closely related and are assumed to be controlled by shared brain areas. We compared perceived velocity and the velocity of smooth pursuit eye movements in human observers in a paradigm that required the segmentation of target object motion from context motion. In each trial, a pursuit target and a visual context were independently perturbed simultaneously to briefly increase or decrease in speed. Observers had to accurately track the target and estimate target speed during the perturbation interval. Here we show that the same motion signals are processed in fundamentally different ways for perception and steady-state smooth pursuit eye movements. For the computation of perceived velocity, motion of the context was subtracted from target motion (motion contrast), whereas pursuit velocity was determined by the motion average (motion assimilation). We conclude that the human motion system uses these computations to optimally accomplish different functions: image segmentation for object motion perception and velocity estimation for the control of smooth pursuit eye movements.
Spering
Miriam
M
Department of Psychology, Justus-Liebig University Giessen, Otto-Behaghel-Str. 10F, D-35394 Giessen, Germany. miriam.spering@psychol.uni-giessen.de
Gegenfurtner
Karl R
KR
D000328:Adult; D005133:Eye Movements / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007700:Kinetics; D009039:Motion Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011698:Pursuit, Smooth / Q000502:physiology*; D013997:Time Factors; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*