Does target viewing time influence perceived reachability?
This study examined the influence of target viewing time on perceived (estimates of) reachability. Right-handed participants were asked to judge the simulated reachability of midline targets using their dominant limb in viewing conditions of 150 ms, 500 ms, 1 s and 2 s. Responses were compared to actual maximum reach. In reference to percent error, interestingly, the 150 ms condition revealed the least error at peripersonal targets and the most inaccuracy with distal (extrapersonal) targets. This condition was also distinct with a significant overestimation bias -- a common observation in earlier studies. However, with increasing viewing time this bias was reduced. These data provide evidence that 150 ms is effective for estimating reach within one's general peripersonal workspace. However, with judgments distal from that point, more time enhanced accuracy, with 500 ms and 1 s being optimal. Overall results are discussed relative to perceptual effectiveness in programming reaching movements.
Gabbard
Carl
C
Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4243, USA. c-gabbard@tamu.edu
Ammar
Diala
D
D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001288:Attention; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D005260:Female; D018737:Hand Strength; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009048:Motor Skills / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D013997:Time Factors; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D017132:Workplace