title: Interventions to support the decision-making process for older people facing the possibility of long-term residential care.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The decision to enter long-term care is often a major life event for older people, made in the context of personal crisis and loss. We hypothesised that the process through which a decision to enter long-term residential care emerges affects the overall psycho-social adjustment to, and acceptance of, this decision, and may have an impact on a range of other outcomes for older persons and their carers, such as health status.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To assess the effects of various decision-support interventions delivered by health or social care providers on the outcomes of older people facing the possibility of entering long-term residential care.
  
  
  METHODS
  We searched: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1 2005); MEDLINE (Ovid) (1966 to November week 3 2004); PsycINFO (Ovid) (1872 to February week 4 2005); and other databases. There were no language restrictions.
  
  
  METHODS
  Randomised controlled trials, quasi-randomised controlled trials/quasi-experimental trials, controlled before and after studies, controlled prospective studies and interrupted time series studies of assessment, information provision, counselling, decision-making facilitation, provision of choice, timing of the process, other communication strategies and any other intervention deemed relevant in supporting decision making for older people facing the possibility of long-term residential care.
  
  
  METHODS
  As there were no studies that met the inclusion criteria no data collection or analysis was conducted.
  
  
  RESULTS
  No studies met the review's inclusion criteria. Although the searches identified a number of studies, they were predominantly opinion pieces or qualitative in nature. While these studies are a potential source of evidence about current practice or people's views, they were not suitable for drawing conclusions about the effects of interventions to support decision-making.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  No eligible studies were identified to inform the use of interventions to support the decision-making process for older people facing the possibility of long-term residential care. This should not be interpreted as demonstrating that these interventions are not effective. The many related studies we identified which did not meet the study design criterion for this review indicate that there is substantial research interest in this topic. It would be useful to summarise the information available in the wider literature using newly-developing methods for synthesising qualitative studies. This could help identify interventions which warrant further research. Rigorously conducted randomised controlled trials of these interventions could then make a valuable contribution to the range of evidence surrounding this significant event in the lives of many older people, informing practice and policy development.
authors.affiliation: Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Social Work Department, Missenden Road, Camperdown, NSW, Australia, 2050. michelle.gravolin@email.cs.nsw.gov.au
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Gravolin
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Rowell
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: de Groot
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D003657:Decision Making; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D006299:Health Services for the Aged; D006801:Humans; D008134:Long-Term Care; D012112:Residential Facilities