title: Patients' perception of asthma severity.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To identify variables patients use to determine the severity of their asthma, the perceived severity (PS), using a fuzzy decision-making analysis (FDMA). To compare these variables with those involved in the assessment of asthma severity according to the global initiative for asthma (GINA) guidelines, the objective severity (OS).
  
  
  METHODS
  Outpatients (51 men, 62 women), aged (m+/-SD) 42.9+/-16.3 years with (% patients) mild intermittent (6.2), mild persistent (15.9), moderate (65.5) and severe (12.4) asthma.
  
  
  METHODS
  Cross sectional, observational study.
  
  
  METHODS
  Both OS (rated by doctors) and PS (rated by patients) were rated as mild intermittent, mild persistent, moderate, or severe. Variables involved in OS assessment, variables self-assessed by patients (dyspnea, perceived treatment efficacy, asthma-related quality of life questionnaire [AQLQ]), patients' sociodemographic characteristics, and asthma characteristics, were evaluated with questionnaires. These variables were pooled, and considered as potential variables patients might use to determine their PS. They were tested against the PS measurement using FDMA. This identified variables patients actually used to determine PS.
  
  
  RESULTS
  On the day of consultation, 68.1% of patients classed their asthma as mild intermittent or mild persistent, 23.9% as moderate persistent, and 8.0% as severe persistent. There was a significant discrepancy (p<0.01) between PS and OS with a clear patient tendency to underestimate asthma severity as compared to OS. Patients determined PS level according to variables assessing their asthma perception, i.e., AQLQ measures and dyspnea, but not variables involved in OS assessment, such as symptom frequency or knowledge of their peak flow rates. Duration of asthma and treatment characteristics were also involved.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  FDMA identified variables patients used to determine PS. It highlighted a discrepancy between patients' and doctors' perceptions of asthma severity, suggesting that assessment of asthma severity should consider both patients' and doctors' perceptions of the disease and includes an AQLQ measure.
authors.affiliation: Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital Cochin, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 27 rue du Faubourg Saint-Jacques, F-75679 Paris Cedex 14, France. alain.lurie@laposte.net
authors.forename: Alain
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Lurie
authors.forename: Christophe
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Marsala
authors.forename: Sarah
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Hartley
authors.forename: Bernadette
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Bouchon-Meunier
authors.forename: Daniel
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Dusser
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D018927:Anti-Asthmatic Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use; D001249:Asthma / Q000523:psychology*; D001294:Attitude to Health; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D004417:Dyspnea / Q000523:psychology*; D005260:Female; D017143:Fuzzy Logic; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010465:Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011788:Quality of Life; D012129:Respiratory Function Tests / Q000379:methods; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
chemical_list: D018927:Anti-Asthmatic Agents