Democracy in animals: the evolution of shared group decisions.
A 'consensus decision' is when the members of a group choose, collectively, between mutually exclusive actions. In humans, consensus decisions are often made democratically or in an 'equally shared' manner, i.e. all group members contribute to the decision. Biologists are only now realizing that shared consensus decisions also occur in social animals (other than eusocial insects). Sharing of decisions is, in principle, more profitable for groups than accepting the 'unshared' decision of a single dominant member. However, this is not true for all individual group members, posing a question as to how shared decision making could evolve. Here, we use a game theory model to show that sharing of decisions can evolve under a wide range of circumstances but especially in the following ones: when groups are heterogeneous in composition; when alternative decision outcomes differ in potential costs and these costs are large; when grouping benefits are marginal; or when groups are close to, or above, optimal size. Since these conditions are common in nature, it is easy to see how mechanisms for shared decision making could have arisen in a wide range of species, including early human ancestors.
Conradt
L
L
School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Falmer, Brighton BN1 9QG, UK. l.conradt@sussex.ac.uk
Roper
T J
TJ
D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D005075:Biological Evolution; D049628:Body Size; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D005716:Game Theory; D008954:Models, Biological; D011156:Population Density