Source-monitoring judgments about anagrams and their solutions: evidence for the role of cognitive operations information in memory.
Generating solutions to anagrams leads to a memory advantage for those solutions, with generated words remembered better than words simply read. However, an additional advantage is not typically found for solutions to difficult anagrams relative to solutions to easy ones, presenting a challenge for the cognitive effort explanation of the generation effect. In the present series of experiments, the effect of manipulating anagram difficulty is explored further by introducing two new source-monitoring judgments. These studies demonstrate that when attention is directed at test to the operations activated during encoding (by way of source-monitoring judgments focused on solving vs. constructing anagrams), a source advantage is observed for difficult anagrams. However, when attention is directed to the anagrams themselves, asking participants to remember the kinds of anagrams generated or solved (based on kind of rule rather than subjective impressions of difficulty), a similar source advantage is not observed. The present studies bring a new perspective to the investigation of difficulty manipulations on memory for problem solving by illustrating the impact of a shift in focus from the effort mediating cognitive operations to specifics about the cognitive operations themselves.
Foley
Mary Ann
MA
Department of Psychology, Skidmore College, Saratoga Springs, New York 12866, USA. mfoley@skidmore.edu
Foley
Hugh J
HJ
D003071:Cognition; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008568:Memory; D011584:Psychology / Q000379:methods*; D013561:Symbolism