Passionate men, emotional women: psychology constructs gender difference in the late 19th century.
The author examines British and American scientific psychology's portrayal of natural and ideal masculinity and femininity in the late 19th century to show how purported differences in emotion and reason were critical to explaining the evolutionary foundation of existing social hierarchies. Strong emotion was identified with heterosexual manliness and men's purportedly better capacity to harness the power of emotion in the service of reason. "Feminine" emotion was portrayed as a comparatively ineffectual emotionality, a by-product of female reproductive physiology and evolutionary need to be attractive to men. The author argues that constructions of emotion by psychology served an important power maintenance function. A concluding section addresses the relevance of this history to the politics of emotion in everyday life, especially assertions of emotional legitimacy.
Shields
Stephanie A
SA
Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. sashields@psu.edu
D004644:Emotions; D005260:Female; D005783:Gender Identity; D049672:History, 19th Century; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011584:Psychology / Q000266:history*; D012727:Sex Characteristics