title: Ethics review: 'Living wills' and intensive care--an overview of the American experience.
abstract: Withdrawal and limitation of life support in the intensive care unit is common, although how this decision is reached can be varied and arbitrary. Inevitably, the patient is unable to participate in this discussion because their capacity is limited by the nature of the illness and the effects of its treatment. Physicians often discuss these decisions with relatives in an attempt to respect the patient's wishes despite evidence suggesting that the relatives may not correctly reflect the patient's desires. Advance decisions, commonly known as 'living wills', have been proposed as a way of facilitating the maintenance of an individual's autonomy when they become incapacitated. Others have argued that legalising advance decisions is euthanasia by the back door. In October 2007 in England and Wales, advance decisions will become legally binding as part of the 2005 Mental Capacity Act. This has been the case in the USA for many years. The purpose of the present review is to examine the published literature regarding the effect of advance decisions in relation to the provision of adult critical care.
authors.affiliation: Intensive Care Department, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro TR1 5LJ, UK. arjtillyard@hotmail.com
authors.forename: Andrew R J
authors.initials: AR
authors.lastname: Tillyard
mesh_terms: D016223:Advance Directives; D000368:Aged; D003422:Critical Care / Q000191:economics / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D017048:Health Care Costs / Q000941:ethics; D006801:Humans; D007362:Intensive Care Units / Q000191:economics / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D011788:Quality of Life; D017236:Suicide, Assisted / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D013727:Terminal Care / Q000191:economics / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D014481:United States