The effects of two monofunctional diluent monomers and two photoinitiator systems on the properties of UDMA-based composites.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the effects of two types of monofunctional co-monomers and two types of photoinitiator systems on the properties of urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA) based dental restorative composites.


METHODS
The resin blends consisted of UDMA and a diluent co-monomer at a molar ratio of 9:1. The diluent comonomers were neo-decyl vinyl ester (Neo 10) or n-hexyl methacrylate (HMA). The photoinitiator system consisted of a bis-acyl phosphine oxide (BAPO) or camphorquinone plus ethyl 4-(dimethylamino)benzoate (CQ/4E). Each initiator system was utilized at 1% or 2% by mass of the resin blend. These resin blends were mixed by hand with silanized zirconia glass (85.7% by mass) to make the various composites. Flexural strength (FS) specimens, made from these pastes by visible light photopolymerization, were tested to failure after 24 hours water storage. Mercury dilatometry was used to evaluate the shrinkage, and the degree of double bond conversion was evaluated using near infrared spectroscopy (NIR). The first hypothesis tested was that use of Neo 10 in a UDMA composite would not have an effect on properties compared to the methacrylate HMA. The second hypothesis tested was that the BAPO initiator would not have an effect on the properties of a UDMA-based composite compared to the CQ/4E initiator.


RESULTS
The hypotheses were tested at alpha = 0.05 and beta = 0.20. The major finding was that the lower level (1% by mass) of BAPO resulted in lower FS, lower conversion and lower shrinkage (rejecting the hypothesis that there was no difference due to initiator used) than composites formulated with the higher level of this initiator or either level of the CQ/4E initiator system, regardless of the comonomer used. The effects of two comonomers used were not differentiated in this study with respect to the properties examined (accepting the hypothesis that there was no difference due to diluent monomer).
Paffenbarger Research Center, American Dental Association Foundation, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Nicola D
ND
Richards
Joseph M
JM
Antonucci
D003764:Dental Materials / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000528:radiation effects; D008027:Light; D008689:Methacrylates / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000528:radiation effects; D018583:Pliability; D011140:Polyurethanes / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000528:radiation effects; D017550:Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared / Q000379:methods
D003764:Dental Materials; D008689:Methacrylates; D011140:Polyurethanes; C029824:urethane dimethacrylate luting resin