Facilitation of risk communication during the anthrax attacks of 2001: the organizational backstory.
The anthrax attacks of 2001 created risk communication problems that cannot be fully understood without appreciating the dynamics among organizations. Case studies of communication in New Jersey, consisting of interviews with a range of participants, found that existing organizational and professional networks facilitated trust among decisionmakers. This interpersonal trust improved communication among agencies and thereby risk communication with the public. For example, "white powder scares" were a problem even in places without contamination. Professionals' trust in each other was vital for responding productively. Conversely, organizational challenges, including conflict among agencies, hindered communication with key audiences. Although centralization and increased control are often seen as the remedy for communicative confusion, they also can quash the improvisational responses needed during crises.
Department of Human Ecology, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA. chess_c@aesop.rutgers.edu
Caron
C
Chess
Lee
L
Clarke
D000881:Anthrax / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000382:microbiology / Q000517:prevention & control / Q000523:psychology; D001408:Bacillus anthracis / Q000472:pathogenicity; D023482:Bioterrorism / Q000523:psychology*; D003142:Communication; D015709:Correspondence as Topic; D003659:Decision Making, Organizational; D005239:Fear; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D033183:Interdisciplinary Communication; D007373:Interinstitutional Relations; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D009515:New Jersey; D019982:Organizational Case Studies; D009936:Organizational Innovation; D011177:Postal Service / Q000458:organization & administration; D011635:Public Health Administration; D018570:Risk Assessment; D035502:Trust; D014481:United States