Experiences of non-progressive and augmented labour among nulliparous women: a qualitative interview study in a Grounded Theory approach.
BACKGROUND
Non-progressive labour is the most common complication in nulliparas and is primarily treated by augmentation. Augmented labour is often terminated by instrumental delivery. Little qualitative research has addressed experiences of non-progressive and augmented deliveries. The aim of this study was to gain a deeper understanding of the experience of non-progressive and augmented labour among nulliparas and their experience of the care they received.


METHODS
A qualitative study was conducted using individual interviews. Data was collected and analysed according to the Grounded Theory method. The participants were a purposive sample of ten women. The interviews were conducted 4-15 weeks after delivery.


RESULTS
The women had contrasting experiences during the birth process. During labour there was a conflict between the expectation of having a natural delivery and actually having a medical delivery. The women experienced a feeling of separation between mind and body. Interacting with the midwife had a major influence on feelings of losing and regaining control. Reconciliation between the contrasting feelings during labour was achieved. The core category was named Dialectical Birth Process and comprised three categories: Balancing natural and medical delivery, Interacting, Losing and regaining control.


CONCLUSIONS
A dialectical process was identified in these women's experiences of non-progressive labour. The process is susceptible to interaction with the midwife; especially her support to the woman's feeling of being in control. Midwives should secure that the woman's recognition of the fact that the labour is non-progressive and augmentation is required is handled with respect for the dialectical process. Augmentation of labour should be managed as close to the course of natural labour and delivery as possible.
Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark. hanne.kjaergaard@rh.regionh.dk
Hanne
H
Kjaergaard
Anne Maria
AM
Foldgast
Anna-Karin
AK
Dykes
D000328:Adult; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D048949:Labor Pain / Q000451:nursing / Q000523:psychology; D008880:Midwifery / Q000379:methods*; D016294:Models, Nursing; D009321:Natural Childbirth / Q000451:nursing / Q000523:psychology; D009723:Nurse-Patient Relations; D007744:Obstetric Labor Complications / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000451:nursing* / Q000523:psychology*; D010298:Parity / Q000502:physiology*; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011247:Pregnancy; D011582:Psychological Theory; D036301:Qualitative Research