Performance of unimanual and bimanual multiphased prehensile movements.
By manipulating task action demands in 2 experiments, the author investigated whether the context-dependent effects seen in unimanual multiphase movements are also present in bimanual movements. Participants (N = 14) in Experiment 1 either placed or tossed objects into targets. The results indicated that the intention to perform a subsequent action with an object could influence the performance of an earlier movement in a sequence in both unimanual and bimanual tasks. Furthermore, assimilation effects were found when the subsequent tasks being performed by the 2 hands were incongruent. In Experiment 2, the author investigated in 12 participants whether planning in a multiphase movement includes some representation of the accuracy demands of the subsequent task. The accuracy demands of a subsequent task did not appear to influence initial movement planning. Instead, the present results support the notion that it is the action requirements of the subsequent movement that lead to context-dependent effects.
Mason
Andrea H
AH
Department of Kinesiology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA. amason@education.wisc.edu
D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D000328:Adult; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D007839:Functional Laterality / Q000502:physiology*; D006225:Hand / Q000502:physiology*; D018737:Hand Strength / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D033182:Intention; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D012016:Reference Values