Small access (30F) clinical central venous smart cannulation: is it adequate?
OBJECTIVE
To assess the performance of 45F vs. 36F smartcanula in CPB with gravity drainage alone.


METHODS
Twenty patients were randomly assigned to two groups receiving for venous drainage a smartcanula which is collapsed over a mandrel for trans-atrial insertion into the inferior vena cava and expanded in situ to either 45F or 36F.


RESULTS
Valve replacement/repair was realized in 7/10 and/or CABG in 6/10 for 36F (69+/-13 years) vs. 5/10 and 5/10, respectively, for 45F (63+/-11 years: NS). Body weight and surface area (BSA) were 83+/-9 kg (1.9+/-0.2 m2, max 2.2 m2) for 36F vs. 79+/-6 kg: NS (1.9+/-0.1 m2 (NS), max 2.1 m2) for 45F. Insertion and access orifice diameter (area) was 6 mm and 10 mm (78.5 mm2) for the 36F vs. 6 mm and 13 mm (132 mm2) for the 45F (+69%). Calculated target pump flow (2.4 l/min/m2) was 4.7+/-0.4 l/min for 36F vs. 4.5+/-0.3 l/min for 45F. Achieved pump flow accounted for 5.0+/-0.3 l/min for 36F (8% above target) vs. 4.8+/-0.3 l/min for 45F (8% above target): NS. The water balance during the pump run (clear volume added minus hemofilter and urine output) was 2.2+/-0.3 l for 36F vs. 2.0 l for 45F: NS.


CONCLUSIONS
Due to its 'open' wall (the vena cava provides the seal), its reduced wall thickness (range: 0.0-0.4 mm), and its self-expanding design, the 36F smartcanula requiring a 30F access orifice has sufficient drainage capacity by gravity alone for full CPB in adults with a BSA up to 2.2 mm2.
von Segesser
Ludwig K
LK
Department of Cardio-vascular Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, CHUV, CCV, BH 10-275, CH-1011, Lausanne, Switzerland. ludwig.von-segesser@chuv.ch
Tozzi
Piergiorgio
P
Ferrari
Enrico Riccardo
ER
Huber
Christoph
C
Delay
Dominique
D
Jegger
David
D
Horisberger
Judith
J