Privatization of health services in less developed countries: an empirical response to the proposals of the World Bank and Wharton School.
Academics and World Bank officials argue that, by reducing out-of-pocket expenditures, expanded private insurance may improve access to needed health services in less developed countries. In this empirical response, the authors examine this recommendation through observations from their research on privatization of health services in the United States, Argentina, Chile, and Mexico. Privatization, either through conversion of public sector to private sector insurance or by expansion of private insurance through enhanced participation by corporate entrepreneurs, generally has not succeeded in improving access to health services for vulnerable groups. Although the impact of privatization has differed among the Latin American countries studied, expansion of private insurance often has generated additional co-payments, which have increased rather than decreased out-of-pocket expenditures, thereby worsening access to needed services. Privatization usually has improved conditions for private corporations and has led to higher administrative costs. To address the devastating problems of access to services worldwide, we must find ways to enhance the delivery of public sector services and must move beyond conventional wisdom about market-based policies such as privatization.
Department of Sociology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA. waitzkin@unm.edu
Howard
H
Waitzkin
Rebeca
R
Jasso-Aguilar
Celia
C
Iriart
D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D003906:Developing Countries; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000458:organization & administration; D006801:Humans; D007348:Insurance, Health / Q000191:economics*; D009313:National Health Programs / Q000458:organization & administration; D011332:Privatization / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D014480:United Nations; D014495:Universities