The murine local lymph node assay: regulatory and potency considerations under REACH.
From June 2007, new chemicals legislation on the registration, evaluation, authorization and restriction of chemicals (REACH) will come into force across the European Union. This will require the submission of data on human health effects of chemicals, including chemical safety assessments which will require measurements of potency. For skin sensitization hazard identification, REACH states that the first-choice in vivo assay is the local lymph node assay (LLNA). This test has also been the UK competent authority's preferred test for skin sensitization since 2002, and has now replaced guinea pig tests in dossiers submitted to it under the Notification of New Substances Regulations. Advantages of the LLNA over guinea pig tests include improvements in animal welfare, a more scientific approach to hazard identification, and the inclusion of a dose-response element in the endpoint, which enables an estimation of potency. However, notifiers to the UK competent authority have sometimes been reluctant to use the assay because of concerns over false-positive reactions. Across Europe, these concerns have been heightened in the lead-up to the introduction of REACH, since the use of in vivo alternatives to the LLNA will require scientific justification. This review will address some of these concerns from a regulatory perspective.
McGarry
Helen F
HF
Corporate Health Specialist Division 1, Health and Safety Executive, Redgrave Court 2.3, Merton Road, Bootle, Merseyside L20 7HS, UK. helen.mcgarry@hse.gsi.gov.uk
D000818:Animals; D017449:Dermatitis, Allergic Contact / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000209:etiology; D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D005062:European Union; D015386:Hazardous Substances / Q000032:analysis* / Q000633:toxicity; D023441:Local Lymph Node Assay; D051379:Mice; D014116:Toxicology / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000379:methods; D006113:United Kingdom
D015386:Hazardous Substances