1-year postactivation results for sequentially implanted bilateral cochlear implant users.
OBJECTIVE
Evaluate speech recognition in quiet and in noise for a group of 12 children, all of whom underwent sequential bilateral cochlear implantation at various ages (range, 1 yr, 8 mo to 9 yr, 6 mo at time of second implant).


METHODS
Retrospective.


METHODS
Outpatient cochlear implant clinic.


METHODS
Children who underwent sequential bilateral cochlear implantation.


METHODS
Rehabilitative.


METHODS
Speech recognition in quiet was evaluated for each ear separately using single-word speech recognition assessments (Multisyllabic Lexical Neighborhood Test and Early Speech Perception Test) via recorded presentation. Speech recognition in noise was assessed for each ear separately and in the bilateral condition by obtaining a spondee recognition threshold in the presence of speech-weighted noise presented at 45 dB hearing level. The primary outcome measure for speech recognition in noise assessment was the signal-to-noise ratio for 50% performance, which was calculated by determining the difference between the presentation level of the noise and the presentation level at which the speech recognition threshold was obtained. The results of these assessments were contrasted between children receiving their second cochlear implant before 4 years of age and children receiving their second cochlear implant after 4 years of age.


RESULTS
A statistically significant difference for speech recognition scores in quiet was obtained between the early-implanted ear and the late-implanted ears for children receiving their second cochlear implant after 4 years of age. There was not a statistically significant difference in speech recognition scores in quiet between the early-implanted and late-implanted ears of children receiving their second cochlear before 4 years of age. Both groups of children possessed better speech recognition scores in noise (statistically significant at an alpha = 0.05) in the bilateral condition relative to either unilateral condition. However, there was not a statistically significant relationship between speech recognition performance in noise and the duration of deafness of the later implanted ear.


CONCLUSIONS
Bilateral cochlear implantation allowed for better speech recognition in noise relative to unilateral performance for a group of 12 children who underwent sequential bilateral cochlear implantation at various ages. There was not a statistically significant relationship between speech recognition in noise benefit, which was defined as the difference in performance between the first implanted ear and the bilateral condition and the age at which the second implant was received. Children receiving bilateral cochlear implants younger than 4 years of age achieved better speech recognition in quiet performance for the later implanted ear as compared with children receiving their second cochlear implant after 4 year of age.
Wolfe
Jace
J
Hearts for Hearing, Otologic Medical Clinic at the Hough Ear Institute, and INTEGRIS Health Decision Support Services, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73112, USA. Jace.wolfe@heartsforhearing.org
Baker
Stan
S
Caraway
Teresa
T
Kasulis
Heather
H
Mears
Andrea
A
Smith
Joanna
J
Swim
Leva
L
Wood
Mark
M
D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D019929:Cochlear Implantation / Q000379:methods; D003054:Cochlear Implants; D005260:Female; D006312:Hearing Loss, Bilateral / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D008297:Male; D009622:Noise / Q000009:adverse effects; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D013067:Speech Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome