Evaluation of fermentable oligosaccharides in diets fed to dogs in comparison to fiber standards.
Blends of fermentable oligosaccharides in combination with nonfermentable fiber, cellulose, were evaluated for their ability to serve as dietary fibers in dog foods. Using a 6 x 6 Latin square design, 6 diets were evaluated that contained either no supplemental fiber, beet pulp, cellulose, or blends of cellulose, fructooligosaccharides, and yeast cell wall added at 2.5% of the diet. Six ileal-cannulated dogs were fed 175 g of their assigned diet twice daily. Chromic oxide served as a digestibility marker. Nutrient digestibility, fecal microbial populations, fermentative end products, and immunological indices were measured. Total tract DM and OM digestibilities were lowest (P < 0.05) for the cellulose treatment. Crude protein digestibility was lower (P < 0.05) for the treatments containing carbohydrate blends. The cellulose treatment had the lowest (P < 0.05) concentration of bacteria, and all diets containing fermentable fiber had greater (P < 0.05) fecal bifidobacteria concentrations compared with the diets without supplemental fermentable fiber. Lactobacilli concentrations tended to be greater (P < 0.08) in treatments containing fermentable fiber compared with the cellulose treatment. Bifidobacteria and lactobacilli concentrations were similar for the beet pulp treatment compared with the fermentable oligosaccharide blends. Total fecal short-chain fatty acid concentration was greater for the beet pulp treatment (P < 0.05) compared with the control and cellulose treatments. The treatments containing fermentable fiber had greater (P < 0.05) fecal butyrate concentrations compared with cellulose and control treatments. Immune indices were not affected by treatment. Our results suggest that dog foods containing blends of fermentable and nonfermentable carbohydrates produce similar physiological results as dog food containing beet pulp as a fiber source. Therefore, blends of these carbohydrates could be useful substitutes for beet pulp in dog foods.
Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana 61801, USA.
I S
IS
Middelbos
N D
ND
Fastinger
G C
GC
Fahey
D000821:Animal Feed; D000824:Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; D000818:Animals; D001644:Bifidobacterium / Q000254:growth & development; D017608:Chromium Compounds; D015169:Colony Count, Microbial / Q000662:veterinary; D004043:Dietary Fiber / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000378:metabolism; D004063:Digestion; D004285:Dogs / Q000276:immunology / Q000378:metabolism* / Q000382:microbiology; D005232:Fatty Acids, Volatile / Q000032:analysis; D005243:Feces / Q000382:microbiology; D005260:Female; D005285:Fermentation; D007082:Ileum / Q000276:immunology / Q000378:metabolism* / Q000382:microbiology; D007070:Immunoglobulin A / Q000276:immunology; D007778:Lactobacillus / Q000254:growth & development; D009844:Oligosaccharides / Q000008:administration & dosage* / Q000378:metabolism*; D011897:Random Allocation
D017608:Chromium Compounds; D004043:Dietary Fiber; D005232:Fatty Acids, Volatile; D007070:Immunoglobulin A; D009844:Oligosaccharides; C023600:chromic oxide