Structuring an inter-sector research partnership: a negotiated zone.
OBJECTIVE
To document and analyze the initial steps in building a health research partnership. To enable a greater appreciation of what these processes entail and also to provide guidance in negotiating the inevitable tensions between parties with different aims and objectives.


METHODS
This case study is based on participant-observation and document analysis. It employed three general analytic strategies: developing a case description, relying on theoretical propositions and thinking about rival explanations.


RESULTS
The development of a research partnership framework entails a complex negotiation process marked by tensions: one of representing the interests of the various parties; and one establishing the basis for collaboration. Some factors can facilitate these processes: acknowledging the specific interests and organizational culture of the various organizations involved; designating a mediator to develop a climate of trust; and mitigating the inequalities among partners, in a process which requires considerable efforts over a rather long period of time.


CONCLUSIONS
The process of structuring the relations among the associated partners does not end with negotiating a partnership accord. Denying this would be tantamount to denying the political nature of a research partnership, and denying those involved any autonomy in future research projects.
Groupe de recherche interdisciplinaire en santé, Université de Montréal, Canada. jocelyne.bernier@UMontreal.CA
Jocelyne
J
Bernier
Melanie
M
Rock
Michel
M
Roy
Renald
R
Bujold
Louise
L
Potvin
D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D006265:Health Care Coalitions / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006302:Health Services Research / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006801:Humans; D017008:Negotiating; D019982:Organizational Case Studies; D015279:Organizational Culture; D011635:Public Health Administration; D011792:Quebec