Interactive computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses: computerized selection of visually similar image sets from a reference library.
OBJECTIVE
The clinical utility of interactive computer-aided diagnosis (ICAD) systems depends on clinical relevance and visual similarity between the queried breast lesions and the ICAD-selected reference regions. The objective of this study is to develop and test a new ICAD scheme that aims improve visual similarity of ICAD-selected reference regions.


METHODS
A large and diverse reference library involving 3,000 regions of interests was established. For each queried breast mass lesion by the observer, the ICAD scheme segments the lesion, classifies its boundary spiculation level, and computes 14 image features representing the segmented lesion and its surrounding tissue background. A conditioned k-nearest neighbor algorithm is applied to select a set of the 25 most "similar" lesions from the reference library. After computing the mutual information between the queried lesion and each of these initially selected 25 lesions, the scheme displays the six reference lesions with the highest mutual information scores. To evaluate the automated selection process of the six "visually similar" lesions to the queried lesion, we conducted a two-alternative forced-choice observer preference study using 85 queried mass lesions. Two sets of reference lesions selected by one new automated ICAD scheme and the other previously reported scheme using a subjective rating method were randomly displayed on the left and right side of the queried lesion. Nine observers were asked to decide for each of the 85 queried lesions which one of the two reference sets was "more visually similar" to the queried lesion.


RESULTS
In classification of mass boundary spiculation levels, the overall agreement rate between the automated scheme and an observer is 58.8% (Kappa = 0.31). In observer preference study, the nine observers preferred on average the reference lesion sets selected by the automated scheme as being more visually similar than the set selected by the subjective rating approach in 53.2% of the queried lesions. The results were not significantly different for the two methods (P = .128).


CONCLUSIONS
This study suggests that using the new automated ICAD scheme, the interobserver variability related issues can thus be avoided. Furthermore, the new scheme maintains the similar performance level as the previous scheme using the subjective rating method that can select reference sets that are significantly more visually similar (P < .05) than when using traditional ICAD schemes in which the mass boundary spiculation levels are not accurately detected and quantified.
Zheng
Bin
B
Department of Radiology, Imaging Research Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA. zhengb@upmc.edu
Mello-Thoms
Claudia
C
Wang
Xiao-Hui
XH
Abrams
Gordon S
GS
Sumkin
Jules H
JH
Chough
Denise M
DM
Ganott
Marie A
MA
Lu
Amy
A
Gur
David
D
D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008327:Mammography; D015588:Observer Variation; D011857:Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted