title: Extensive variation in synonymous substitution rates in mitochondrial genes of seed plants.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  It has long been known that rates of synonymous substitutions are unusually low in mitochondrial genes of flowering and other land plants. Although two dramatic exceptions to this pattern have recently been reported, it is unclear how often major increases in substitution rates occur during plant mitochondrial evolution and what the overall magnitude of substitution rate variation is across plants.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A broad survey was undertaken to evaluate synonymous substitution rates in mitochondrial genes of angiosperms and gymnosperms. Although most taxa conform to the generality that plant mitochondrial sequences evolve slowly, additional cases of highly accelerated rates were found. We explore in detail one of these new cases, within the genus Silene. A roughly 100-fold increase in synonymous substitution rate is estimated to have taken place within the last 5 million years and involves only one of ten species of Silene sampled in this study. Examples of unusually slow sequence evolution were also identified. Comparison of the fastest and slowest lineages shows that synonymous substitution rates vary by four orders of magnitude across seed plants. In other words, some plant mitochondrial lineages accumulate more synonymous change in 10,000 years than do others in 100 million years. Several perplexing cases of gene-to-gene variation in sequence divergence within a plant were uncovered. Some of these probably reflect interesting biological phenomena, such as horizontal gene transfer, mitochondrial-to-nucleus transfer, and intragenomic variation in mitochondrial substitution rates, whereas others are likely the result of various kinds of errors.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The extremes of synonymous substitution rates measured here constitute by far the largest known range of rate variation for any group of organisms. These results highlight the utility of examining absolute substitution rates in a phylogenetic context rather than by traditional pairwise methods. Why substitution rates are generally so low in plant mitochondrial genomes yet occasionally increase dramatically remains mysterious.
authors: Department of Biology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47405, USA. mowerj@tcd.ie <mowerj@tcd.ie>
authors: Jeffrey P
authors: JP
authors: Mower
authors: Pascal
authors: P
authors: Touzet
authors: Julie S
authors: JS
authors: Gummow
authors: Lynda F
authors: LF
authors: Delph
authors: Jeffrey D
authors: JD
authors: Palmer
mesh_terms: D019943:Amino Acid Substitution; D032462:Cycadopsida / Q000145:classification / Q000235:genetics*; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D050259:Genes, Mitochondrial; D019684:Magnoliopsida / Q000145:classification / Q000235:genetics*; D010802:Phylogeny; D017386:Sequence Homology, Amino Acid
references: J Mol Evol. 2002 Nov;55(5):501-8
references: 12399924
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 May 27;94(11):5722-7
references: 9159140
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jul 23;99(15):9905-12
references: 12119382
references: Genetics. 2006 Dec;174(4):1983-94
references: 16980398
references: Nature. 2003 Jul 10;424(6945):197-201
references: 12853958
references: Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2006 Jul;40(1):208-17
references: 16621615
references: Mol Genet Genomics. 2006 Sep;276(3):285-93
references: 16862402
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Dec;84(24):9054-8
references: 3480529
references: Plant Mol Biol. 2000 Jan;42(1):25-43
references: 10688129
references: Cladistics. 2002 Apr;18(2):127-136
references: 34911224
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Dec 21;96(26):15324-9
references: 10611383
references: Bioinformatics. 2005 Mar 1;21(5):676-9
references: 15509596
references: Mol Biol Evol. 1994 Sep;11(5):715-24
references: 7968485
references: BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 Apr 12;6:96
references: 15826309
references: Evolution. 2001 Apr;55(4):677-83
references: 11392385
references: Science. 1999 Oct 29;286(5441):947-50
references: 10542147
references: Evolution. 2005 Aug;59(8):1653-70
references: 16329238
references: Syst Biol. 2004 Dec;53(6):914-32
references: 15764560
references: BMC Evol Biol. 2004 Oct 20;4:40
references: 15496229
references: Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Jun;19(6):938-49
references: 12032250
references: Bioinformatics. 2003 Jan 22;19(2):301-2
references: 12538260
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Dec 21;101(51):17741-6
references: 15598738
references: J Exp Bot. 2007;58(1):1-9
references: 17030541
references: Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Aug;24(8):1783-91
references: 17533174
references: BMC Evol Biol. 2005 Dec 20;5:73
references: 16368004
references: Biochimie. 2007 Jan;89(1):159-67
references: 17092626
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Nov 7;268(1482):2211-20
references: 11674868
references: Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Apr;16(4):441-52
references: 10331271
references: Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Apr;14(4):455-60
references: 9100375
references: Plant Mol Biol. 1998 May;37(2):225-34
references: 9617796
references: Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Jun;21(6):1074-80
references: 15014142
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Apr 11;97(8):4086-91
references: 10760277
references: Bioinformatics. 2006 Nov 1;22(21):2688-90
references: 16928733
references: J Mol Evol. 1988 Dec-1989 Feb;28(1-2):87-97
references: 3148746
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Apr 11;97(8):4092-7
references: 10760278