Phylogenomic analyses of KCNA gene clusters in vertebrates: why do gene clusters stay intact?
BACKGROUND
Gene clusters are of interest for the understanding of genome evolution since they provide insight in large-scale duplications events as well as patterns of individual gene losses. Vertebrates tend to have multiple copies of gene clusters that typically are only single clusters or are not present at all in genomes of invertebrates. We investigated the genomic architecture and conserved non-coding sequences of vertebrate KCNA gene clusters. KCNA genes encode shaker-related voltage-gated potassium channels and are arranged in two three-gene clusters in tetrapods. Teleost fish are found to possess four clusters. The two tetrapod KNCA clusters are of approximately the same age as the Hox gene clusters that arose through duplications early in vertebrate evolution. For some genes, their conserved retention and arrangement in clusters are thought to be related to regulatory elements in the intergenic regions, which might prevent rearrangements and gene loss. Interestingly, this hypothesis does not appear to apply to the KCNA clusters, as too few conserved putative regulatory elements are retained.


RESULTS
We obtained KCNA coding sequences from basal ray-finned fishes (sturgeon, gar, bowfin) and confirmed that the duplication of these genes is specific to teleosts and therefore consistent with the fish-specific genome duplication (FSGD). Phylogenetic analyses of the genes suggest a basal position of the only intron containing KCNA gene in vertebrates (KCNA7). Sistergroup relationships of KCNA1/2 and KCNA3/6 support that a large-scale duplication gave rise to the two clusters found in the genome of tetrapods. We analyzed the intergenic regions of KCNA clusters in vertebrates and found that there are only a few conserved sequences shared between tetrapods and teleosts or between paralogous clusters. The orthologous teleost clusters, however, show sequence conservation in these regions.


CONCLUSIONS
The lack of overall conserved sequences in intergenic regions suggests that there are either other processes than regulatory evolution leading to cluster conservation or that the ancestral regulatory relationships among genes in KCNA clusters have been changed together with their regulatory sites.
Hoegg
Simone
S
Lehrstuhl für Zoologie und Evolutionsbiologie, Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany. Hoegg@uni-konstanz.de
Meyer
Axel
A
D000818:Animals; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D016013:Likelihood Functions; D005810:Multigene Family; D010641:Phenotype; D010802:Phylogeny; D051637:Shaker Superfamily of Potassium Channels / Q000235:genetics*; D014714:Vertebrates / Q000235:genetics*
D051637:Shaker Superfamily of Potassium Channels
Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Nov;21(11):2116-21
15282332
Novartis Found Symp. 2002;245:84-101; discussion 101-8, 165-8
12027017
Nature. 2004 Oct 21;431(7011):946-57
15496914
J Mol Biol. 1988 Sep 20;203(2):439-55
3199442
Cell. 1992 Jan 24;68(2):283-302
1346368
Genomics. 1994 Mar 15;20(2):191-202
8020965
Nature. 1994 Aug 18;370(6490):563-6
7914353
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 1996 Dec;6(6):715-22
8994842
FEBS Lett. 1997 Jan 2;400(1):2-8
9000502
Annu Rev Neurosci. 1997;20:91-123
9056709
Genomics. 1997 Aug 15;44(1):110-7
9286706
Science. 1998 Apr 3;280(5360):69-77
9525859
Science. 1998 Nov 27;282(5394):1711-4
9831563
Genetics. 1999 Apr;151(4):1531-45
10101175
Methods Cell Biol. 2004;77:545-61
15602931
Genome Biol. 2005;6(4):214
15833129
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Apr 29;357(1420):531-44
12028790
Genome Res. 2003 Mar;13(3):382-90
12618368
Trends Genet. 2003 Apr;19(4):200-6
12683973
Genome Res. 2003 Jun;13(6A):1111-22
12799348
J Struct Funct Genomics. 2003;3(1-4):75-84
12836687
Syst Biol. 2003 Oct;52(5):696-704
14530136
Genome Res. 2004 Jan;14(1):1-10
14707165
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Feb 10;101(6):1638-43
14757817
Brain Res Mol Brain Res. 2004 Feb 5;121(1-2):70-85
14969738
Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Mar;21(3):580-6
14694077
J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol. 2004 Mar 15;302(2):165-73
15054859
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004 May;31(2):581-604
15062796
Trends Genet. 2004 Sep;20(9):424-31
15313551
Trends Genet. 2004 Oct;20(10):481-90
15363902
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Dec;22(12):2417-27
16093565
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Jan;23(1):121-36
16162861
Evol Dev. 2005 Nov-Dec;7(6):556-67
16336409
Nat Rev Genet. 2005 Dec;6(12):881-92
16341069
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Feb;23(2):245-53
16207937
BMC Genomics. 2006;7:20
16466575
J Mol Evol. 2006 Jun;62(6):772-84
16752215
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jul 5;103(27):10369-72
16801555
BMC Genomics. 2006;7:271
17062144
Nature. 2007 Jun 7;447(7145):714-9
17554307
Bioinformatics. 2005 May 1;21(9):2104-5
15647292
Trends Genet. 2005 Aug;21(8):421-4
15967537
Bioessays. 2005 Sep;27(9):937-45
16108068
PLoS Biol. 2005 Oct;3(10):e314
16128622
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 1999 Oct;10(5):517-22
10597635
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 1999 Oct;10(5):523-30
10597636
Semin Cell Dev Biol. 1999 Oct;10(5):531-40
10597637
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1999 Dec;11(6):699-704
10600714
Genetics. 2000 Jan;154(1):459-73
10629003
Bioinformatics. 2000 Nov;16(11):1046-7
11159318
Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2001 May;129(1):17-28
11337248
Bioinformatics. 2001 Aug;17(8):754-5
11524383
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2001 Oct 29;356(1414):1661-79
11604130
J Mol Evol. 2001 Oct-Nov;53(4-5):436-46
11675603
J Mol Evol. 2004 Aug;59(2):190-203
15486693