Social inequalities in injury occurrence and in disability retirement attributable to injuries: a 5 year follow-up study of a 2.1 million gainfully employed people.
BACKGROUND
Inequalities in injury related disability retirement may be due to differences in injury risk and or differences in retirement given injury. The aim of the present study was to measure social inequalities in injury occurrence and injury related disability retirement.


METHODS
All people in the Danish labour force aged 20-59 years 1 January 1997 were followed for injury related hospital contacts during 1997 and all people in the Danish labour force aged 21-54 years 1 January 1998 were followed for injury related hospital contacts during 1997 and for disability retirements during 1998-2002. As inequality indices we used excess fractions (EF) i.e. the proportions of the cases that would not have occurred if the risks in each social group had been as low as they were in the occupational group with the highest skill requirements.


RESULTS
With regard to the risk that an injury will occur, the EF was 36% among men and 10% among women. With regard to the risk that an injury will lead to disability retirement, the EF was 43% among men and 47% among women. The combined effect of the two types of inequalities rendered an EF for injury related disability retirement of 64% among men and 53% among women. The correlation between the case disability rate ratios among men and those among women was low (r = -0.110, P = 0.795).


CONCLUSIONS
The social inequality in injury related disability retirement lies only to some degree in the differences in the injury risk. More important are differences in the consequences of an injury. This was especially pronounced among the women.
Hannerz
Harald
H
National Institute of Occupational Health, Copenhagen, Denmark. hh@ami.dk
Mikkelsen
Kim L
KL
Nielsen
Martin L
ML
Tüchsen
Finn
F
Spangenberg
Søren
S
D000062:Accidents, Occupational / Q000191:economics* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D000328:Adult; D003718:Denmark / Q000453:epidemiology; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D054624:Health Status Disparities; D054625:Healthcare Disparities; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D018868:Insurance, Disability / Q000941:ethics*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012042:Registries; D012179:Retirement / Q000191:economics* / Q000941:ethics; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012307:Risk Factors; D017678:Sex Distribution; D012935:Social Justice; D014947:Wounds and Injuries / Q000191:economics* / Q000453:epidemiology*
Occup Environ Med. 2004 Apr;61(4):289-94
15031385
Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Dec;31(6):1183-91
12540720
Soc Sci Med. 1991;32(1):15-27
2008617
Psychol Med. 1992 Aug;22(3):751-64
1410099
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 May 1;19(9):1011-20
8029734
J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Jul;49(7):791-4
8691230
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Dec 15;22(24):2911-8
9431627
Scand J Work Environ Health. 1997 Dec;23(6):403-13
9476803
Int J Epidemiol. 1998 Dec;27(6):1019-25
10024197
Int J Epidemiol. 1998 Dec;27(6):1026-32
10024198
Health Serv Res. 1999 Apr;34(1 Pt 2):215-27
10199670
Am J Ind Med. 1999 Jun;35(6):619-31
10332515
Occup Environ Med. 2005 Feb;62(2):135-40
15657199
Dan Med Bull. 2004 May;51(2):207-10
16009057
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2005;31 Suppl 2:104-9
16363453
BMC Public Health. 2006;6:103
16630360
J Occup Environ Med. 2000 Mar;42(3):323-33
10738711
Am J Ind Med. 2000 Dec;38(6):619-27
11071684
Scand J Public Health. 2001 Jun;29(2):96-103
11484872
Eur J Epidemiol. 2001;17(1):65-9
11523578
Am J Ind Med. 2001 Oct;40(4):374-92
11598987
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2000 May;55(3):S131-40
11833981
Soc Secur Bull. 2001-2002;64(1):32-44
12428516
Int J Epidemiol. 2002 Dec;31(6):1155-61
12540716
Am J Ind Med. 2004 May;45(5):408-16
15095423