title: Validation of a diagnostic reminder system in emergency medicine: a multi-centre study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Diagnostic error is a significant problem in emergency medicine, where initial clinical assessment and decision making is often based on incomplete clinical information. Traditional computerised diagnostic systems have been of limited use in the acute setting, mainly due to the need for lengthy system consultation. We evaluated a novel web-based reminder system, which provides rapid diagnostic advice to users based on free text search terms.
  
  
  METHODS
  Clinical data collected from patients presenting to three emergency departments with acute medical problems were entered into the diagnostic system. The displayed results were assessed against the final discharge diagnoses for patients who were admitted to hospital (diagnostic accuracy) and against a set of "appropriate" diagnoses for each case provided by an expert panel (potential utility).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Data were collected from 594 patients (53.4% of screened attendances). Mean age was 49.4 years (95% CI 47.7 to 51.1) and the majority had significant past illnesses. Most were assessed first by junior doctors (70%) and 266/594 (44.6%) were admitted to hospital. Overall, the diagnostic system displayed the final discharge diagnosis in 95% of inpatients and 90% of "must-not-miss" diagnoses suggested by the expert panel. The discharge diagnosis appeared within the first 10 suggestions in 78% of cases.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The Isabel diagnostic aid has been shown to be of potential use in reminding junior doctors of key diagnoses in the emergency department. The effects of its widespread use on decision making and diagnostic error can be clarified by evaluating its impact on routine clinical decision making.
authors: Children's Acute Transport Service, London WC1R 4LL, UK. ram@isabelhealthcare.com
authors: Padmanabhan
authors: P
authors: Ramnarayan
authors: Natalie
authors: N
authors: Cronje
authors: Ruth
authors: R
authors: Brown
authors: Rupert
authors: R
authors: Negus
authors: Bill
authors: B
authors: Coode
authors: Philip
authors: P
authors: Moss
authors: Taj
authors: T
authors: Hassan
authors: Wayne
authors: W
authors: Hamer
authors: Joseph
authors: J
authors: Britto
mesh_terms: D000704:Analysis of Variance; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D020000:Decision Support Systems, Clinical; D003936:Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D003951:Diagnostic Errors / Q000517:prevention & control*; D004636:Emergency Service, Hospital / Q000458:organization & administration*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008131:London; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies; D017010:Reminder Systems; D014584:User-Computer Interface
references: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006;6:22
references: 16646956
references: J R Soc Med. 2005 Jun;98(6):255-8
references: 15928374
references: BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):774-7
references: 10720365
references: Acad Med. 2002 Oct;77(10):981-92
references: 12377672
references: Lancet. 2002 Oct 19;360(9341):1259
references: 12401291
references: Arch Dis Child. 2003 May;88(5):408-13
references: 12716712
references: Fam Pract. 2003 Jun;20(3):231-6
references: 12738689
references: Acad Med. 2003 Aug;78(8):775-80
references: 12915363
references: Emerg Med J. 2003 Sep;20(5):426-8
references: 12954680
references: N Z Med J. 2003 Oct 10;116(1183):U624
references: 14581938
references: J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 Nov-Dec;10(6):608-10
references: 14613944
references: Stud Health Technol Inform. 2004;107(Pt 2):1091-5
references: 15360981
references: N Engl J Med. 1991 Feb 7;324(6):377-84
references: 1824793
references: N Engl J Med. 1994 Jun 23;330(25):1792-6
references: 8190157
references: J Healthc Risk Manag. 1998 Fall;18(4):62-9
references: 10537844
references: Acad Emerg Med. 1999 Sep;6(9):947-52
references: 10490259
references: CMAJ. 1999 Sep 21;161(6):725-8
references: 10513280
references: Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Jan;12(1):57-64
references: 15635139
references: J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Apr;20(4):334-9
references: 15857490
references: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006;6:37
references: 17087835