title: Management of renal replacement therapy in acute kidney injury: a survey of practitioner prescribing practices.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Data on current practices for management of renal replacement therapy (RRT) in acute kidney injury (AKI) are limited, particularly with regard to the dosing of therapy.
  
  
  METHODS
  A survey was conducted of practitioners at the 27 study sites that participate in the Veterans Affairs/National Institutes of Health Acute Renal Trial Network (ATN) Study before initiation of patient enrollment for ascertainment of the local prevailing practices for management of RRT in critically ill patients with AKI. Surveys were returned from 130 practitioners at 26 of 27 study sites; the remaining study site provided aggregate data.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Intermittent hemodialysis and continuous RRT were the most commonly used modalities of RRT, with sustained low-efficiency dialysis and other "hybrid" treatments used in fewer than 10% of patients. Intermittent hemodialysis was most commonly provided on a thrice-weekly or every-other-day schedule, with only infrequent assessment of the delivered dosage of therapy. Most practitioners reported that they did not dose continuous RRT on the basis of patient weight. The average prescribed dosage of therapy corresponded to a weight-based dosage of no more than 20 to 25 ml/kg per h.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  These results provide insight into clinical management of RRT and provide normative data for evaluation of the design of ongoing clinical trials.
authors: Research Service, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA 15240-0001, USA.
authors: Pamela
authors: P
authors: Overberger
authors: Matthew
authors: M
authors: Pesacreta
authors: Paul M
authors: PM
authors: Palevsky
mesh_terms: D006801:Humans; D007676:Kidney Failure, Chronic / Q000628:therapy*; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'; D017582:Renal Replacement Therapy / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
references: N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8
references: 10793162
references: Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2006 Mar;21(3):690-6
references: 16326743
references: N Engl J Med. 2002 Jan 31;346(5):305-10
references: 11821506
references: Am J Nephrol. 2002 Jan-Feb;22(1):29-34
references: 11919400
references: Kidney Int. 2002 Nov;62(5):1855-63
references: 12371989
references: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Dec 1;166(11):1510-4
references: 12406836
references: N Engl J Med. 2003 Apr 3;348(14):1393-401
references: 12672870
references: N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 14;349(7):629-30
references: 12917298
references: Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004 Mar 1;169(5):562-4
references: 14701713
references: Crit Care Med. 2004 Mar;32(3):852-7
references: 15090973
references: Kidney Int. 2004 Oct;66(4):1613-21
references: 15458458
references: Am J Kidney Dis. 1993 Apr;21(4):400-4
references: 8465820
references: Am J Kidney Dis. 1998 Nov;32(5):731-8
references: 9820441
references: Kidney Int. 1999 Apr;55(4):1501-8
references: 10201016
references: Am J Nephrol. 1999;19(3):377-82
references: 10393374
references: Curr Opin Crit Care. 2004 Dec;10(6):560-4
references: 15616401
references: Curr Opin Crit Care. 2004 Dec;10(6):579-82
references: 15616405
references: Clin Trials. 2005;2(5):423-35
references: 16317811
references: Lancet. 2000 Jul 1;356(9223):26-30
references: 10892761