title: Counting the cost of an absent mind: mind wandering as an underrecognized influence on educational performance.
abstract: Successful learning requires that individuals integrate information from the external environment with their own internal representations. In this article, we consider the role that mind wandering plays in education. Mind wandering represents a state of decoupled attention because, instead of processing information from the external environment, our attention is directed toward our own private thoughts and feelings. In principle, because mind wandering is a state of decoupled attention, it represents a fundamental breakdown in the individual's ability to attend (and therefore integrate) information from the external environment. We consider evidence that mind wandering impairs the encoding of information, leading to failures in building a propositional model of a sentence and, ultimately, impairing the building of a narrative model with sufficient detail to allow generating inferences. Next, because recognizing and correcting for mind wandering is a metacognitive skill, certain client groups, such as those suffering from dysphoria or attention deficit disorder, may be unable to correct for the deficits associated with mind wandering, and so may suffer greater negative consequences during education. Finally, we consider how to apply this research to educational settings.
authors: School of Psychology, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, Scotland. j.smallwood@abdn.ac.uk
authors: Jonathan
authors: J
authors: Smallwood
authors: Daniel J
authors: DJ
authors: Fishman
authors: Jonathan W
authors: JW
authors: Schooler
mesh_terms: D000124:Achievement; D001288:Attention; D001921:Brain; D002648:Child; D003071:Cognition; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D013850:Thinking
references: Behav Res Ther. 1999 Jul;37 Suppl 1:S53-77
references: 10402696
references: Mem Cognit. 1995 Sep;23(5):551-9
references: 7476241
references: Conscious Cogn. 2003 Sep;12(3):452-84
references: 12941287
references: Conscious Cogn. 2004 Dec;13(4):657-90
references: 15522626
references: Exp Gerontol. 1993 Jul-Oct;28(4-5):485-92
references: 8224044
references: J Abnorm Psychol. 2000 Feb;109(1):150-5
references: 10740947
references: Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 1998 Dec;23(4):243-63
references: 10457815
references: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2000 Aug;68(4):615-23
references: 10965637
references: Mem Cognit. 2008 Sep;36(6):1144-50
references: 18927032
references: Conscious Cogn. 1995 Mar;4(1):1-21
references: 7497092
references: Conscious Cogn. 2006 Mar;15(1):218-31
references: 16115782
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Aug 1;6(8):339-344
references: 12140084
references: Cortex. 2004 Sep-Dec;40(4-5):623-30
references: 15505972
references: Conscious Cogn. 2004 Dec;13(4):789-820
references: 15522632
references: Neuropsychologia. 1997 Jun;35(6):747-58
references: 9204482
references: Psychol Bull. 1997 Jan;121(1):65-94
references: 9000892
references: Annu Rev Psychol. 1998;49:345-75
references: 15012472
references: Psychol Bull. 2006 Nov;132(6):946-58
references: 17073528
references: Psychol Bull. 2001 Sep;127(5):571-98
references: 11548968
references: Mem Cognit. 1991 Sep;19(5):507-13
references: 1956311