Different effects of static versus cyclic compressive loading on rat intervertebral disc height and water loss in vitro.
METHODS
In vitro biomechanical study on rat caudal motion segments to evaluate association between compressive loading and water content under static and cyclic conditions.


OBJECTIVE
To test hypotheses: 1) there is no difference in height loss and fluid (volume) loss of discs loaded in compression under cyclic (0.15-1.0 MPa) and static conditions with the same root-mean-square (RMS) magnitudes (0.575 MPa); and 2) after initial disc bulge, tissue water loss is directly proportional to height loss under static loading.


BACKGROUND
Disc degeneration affects water content, elastic and viscoelastic behaviors. There is limited understanding of the association between transient water loss and viscoelastic creep in a controlled in vitro environment where inferences may be made regarding mechanisms of viscoelasticity.


METHODS
A total of 126 caudal motion segments from 21 Wistar rats were tested in compression using 1 of 6 protocols: Static loading at 1.0 MPa for 9, 90, and 900 minutes, Cyclic loading at 0.15 to 1.0 MPa/1 Hz for 90 minutes, Mid-Static loading at 0.575 MPa for 90 minutes, and control. Water content was then measured in anulus and nucleus regions.


RESULTS
Percent water loss was significantly greater in nucleus than anulus regions, suggesting some water redistribution, with average values under 1 MPa static loading of 23.0% and 14.9% after 90 minutes and 26.9% and 17.6% after 900 minutes, respectively. Cyclic loading resulted in significantly greater height loss (0.506 +/- 0.108 mm) than static loading with the same RMS value (0.402 +/- 0.096 mm), but not significantly less than static loading at peak value (0.539 +/- 0.122 mm). Significant and strong correlations were found between percent water loss and disc height loss, suggesting water was lost through volume decrease.


CONCLUSIONS
Peak magnitude of cyclic compression and not RMS value was most important in determining height change and water loss, likely due to differences between disc creep and recovery rates. Water redistribution from nucleus to anulus occurred under loading consistent with an initial elastic compression (and associated disc bulge) followed by a reduction in disc volume over time.
Masuoka
Kazunori
K
University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
Michalek
Arthur J
AJ
MacLean
Jeffrey J
JJ
Stokes
Ian A F
IA
Iatridis
James C
JC
D000818:Animals; D001834:Body Water / Q000502:physiology*; D019245:Compressive Strength / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D007403:Intervertebral Disc / Q000502:physiology*; D051381:Rats; D017208:Rats, Wistar; D014870:Water Loss, Insensible / Q000502:physiology*; D016474:Weight-Bearing / Q000502:physiology
J Clin Invest. 1996 Aug 15;98(4):996-1003
8770872
J Biomech. 2007;40(1):55-63
16427060
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Jan 15;22(2):133-9
9122792
Clin Anat. 1998;11(1):1-8
9445091
Surg Radiol Anat. 1998;20(6):403-7
9932324
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 May 15;24(10):1015-22
10332795
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1964 Jul;46:1077-92
14193834
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Mar 15;25(6):662-9
10752096
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Apr 15;26(8):883-8
11317110
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 May 1;26(9):E174-81
11337634
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002 Apr;15(2):157-63
11927827
Ann Biomed Eng. 2002 Nov-Dec;30(10):1234-41
12540199
J Biomech Eng. 2003 Feb;125(1):12-24
12661193
J Biomech. 2004 Feb;37(2):213-21
14706324
Ann Biomed Eng. 2004 Jan;32(1):70-6
14964723
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Apr 1;29(7):713-22
15087791
Connect Tissue Res. 1981;9(1):1-10
6456121
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Sep;8(6):665-71
6685921
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Feb;13(2):179-87
3406838
J Biomech. 1988;21(5):425-33
3417694
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Jun;15(6):567-70
2402697
Radiology. 1993 Aug;188(2):351-4
8327677
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Apr 15;19(8):935-40
8009352
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Dec 1;29(23):2691-9
15564918
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Dec 1;29(23):2700-9
15564919
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Dec 1;29(23):2724-32
15564921
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Dec 1;29(23):2733-41
15564922
J Biomech. 2005 Oct;38(10):1972-83
15936025
J Orthop Res. 2005 Sep;23(5):1120-7
16140193
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Apr;88 Suppl 2:36-40
16595441
J Biomech. 2006;39(8):1392-400
15970200
Ann Biomed Eng. 2006 May;34(5):769-77
16598654
Eur Spine J. 2006 Aug;15 Suppl 3:S361-71
16724211
Ann Rheum Dis. 1996 Dec;55(12):880-7
9014581