Nuclear and mitochondrial data reveal different evolutionary processes in the Lake Tanganyika cichlid genus Tropheus.
BACKGROUND
Cichlid fishes are notorious for their wealth of intra- and interspecific colour pattern diversity. In Lake Tanganyika, the endemic genus Tropheus represents the most impressive example for geographic variation in the pattern and hue of integument colouration, but the taxonomy of the over 100 mostly allopatric colour morphs remains to a large degree unresolved. Previous studies of mitochondrial DNA sequence data revealed polyphyly of the six nominally described species and complex phylogeographic patterns influenced by lake level fluctuations and population admixture, and suggested the parallel evolution of similar colour patterns in divergent evolutionary lineages. A gene tree of a rapidly radiating group may be subject to incomplete and stochastic lineage sorting, and to overcome this problem we used multi-locus, nuclear AFLP data in comparison with mtDNA sequences to study diversification, migration and introgression in Tropheus colour morphs in Lake Tanganyika.


RESULTS
Significant incongruence between phylogenetic reconstructions from mitochondrial and AFLP data suggested incomplete sorting of mitochondrial haplotypes as well as frequent introgression between differentiated lineages. In contrast to the mitochondrial phylogeny, the AFLP phenogram was largely congruent with species classifications, colour pattern similarities, and in many cases also with the current geographic distribution of populations, and did not produce evidence of convergent colour pattern evolution. Homoplasy in the AFLP data was used to identify populations that were strongly affected by introgression.


CONCLUSIONS
Different evolutionary processes were distinguished by the combination of mitochondrial and AFLP data. Mitochondrial phylogeographic patterns retained signals of large-scale migration events triggered by historical, major lake level fluctuations, whereas AFLP data indicated genetic cohesion among local groups of populations resulting from secondary contact of adjacent populations in the course of the more frequently occurring, minor lake level fluctuations. There was no support for the parallel evolution of similar colour patterns in the AFLP data. Genetic signatures of introgression and hybridisation detected in several populations suggest that lake level fluctuations drove the stunning diversification of Tropheus morphs not only through population fragmentation, but also by promoting hybridisation between differentiated morphs in secondary contact.
Egger
Bernd
B
Department of Zoology, University of Graz, Universitätsplatz 2, 8010 Graz, Austria. b.egger@uni-graz.at
Koblmüller
Stephan
S
Sturmbauer
Christian
C
Sefc
Kristina M
KM
D000350:Africa, Central; D000351:Africa, Eastern; D000818:Animals; D001483:Base Sequence; D023681:Cichlids / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology; D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial / Q000235:genetics*; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D005819:Genetic Markers; D014644:Genetic Variation; D010802:Phylogeny; D019105:Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique
D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial; D005819:Genetic Markers
Front Zool. 2004 Oct 26;1(1):5
15679917
BMC Evol Biol. 2005 Feb 21;5:17
15723698
J Mol Evol. 1985;22(2):160-74
3934395
J Mol Evol. 1995 Jul;41(1):54-66
7608989
Mol Biol Evol. 1998 Apr;15(4):391-407
9549090
Comput Appl Biosci. 1994 Sep;10(5):569-70
7828077
Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Nov;18(11):2057-66
11606702
J Mol Evol. 2007 Jan;64(1):33-49
17160645
Mol Ecol. 2002 Mar;11(3):619-25
11918795
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2006 Nov;41(2):445-53
16782357
BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Jan 25;7:7
17254340
Mol Ecol. 2000 Oct;9(10):1657-9
11050560
J Mol Evol. 1997 Jul;45(1):70-83
9211737
Evolution. 2004 Apr;58(4):825-41
15154558
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1979 Oct;76(10):5269-73
291943
J Mol Evol. 2003 Jan;56(1):54-68
12569423
Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Nov 11;23(21):4407-14
7501463
Nature. 1994 Apr 7;368(6471):539-42
8139686
Mol Ecol. 2001 May;10(5):1207-25
11380878
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Apr 27;96(9):5107-10
10220426
Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Aug;16(8):1105-13
10474905
Mol Ecol. 2003 Sep;12(9):2497-504
12919487
Nucleic Acids Res. 1988 Feb 11;16(3):1215
3344216
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2007 Sep;44(3):1295-305
17383901
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2006 Feb;38(2):426-38
15964213
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2000 Jan;14(1):89-106
10631044
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Nov 25;100(24):14074-9
14614144
Bioinformatics. 2001 Aug;17(8):754-5
11524383
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Feb 7;273(1584):257-66
16543167
Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Dec;19(12):2176-90
12446809
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Dec 10;99(25):16122-7
12451181
J Mol Evol. 2001 Oct-Nov;53(4-5):496-507
11675610
Methods Enzymol. 2005;395:161-77
15865967
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Nov 24;95(24):14238-43
9826684
Mol Ecol. 2001 Jul;10(7):1765-72
11472543
Theor Appl Genet. 1995 Jan;90(1):27-32
24173780
Bioinformatics. 1998;14(9):817-8
9918953
Mol Biol Evol. 1994 Jul;11(4):691-703
8078408
Mol Ecol. 2006 Feb;15(2):459-78
16448413
Evolution. 1995 Aug;49(4):718-726
28565131
Syst Biol. 2005 Feb;54(1):35-55
15805009
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Apr;19(4):198-207
16701254
J Mol Evol. 2005 Mar;60(3):277-89
15871039
Nature. 1992 Aug 13;358(6387):578-81
1501712
Mol Ecol. 2001 Feb;10(2):419-26
11298956