title: Breeding experience and population density affect the ability of a songbird to respond to future climate variation.
abstract: Predicting how populations respond to climate change requires an understanding of whether individuals or cohorts within populations vary in their response to climate variation. We used mixed-effects models on a song sparrow (Melospiza melodia) population in British Columbia, Canada, to examine differences among females and cohorts in their average breeding date and breeding date plasticity in response to the El Niño Southern Oscillation. Climatic variables, age and population density were strong predictors of timing of breeding, but we also found considerable variation among individual females and cohorts. Within cohorts, females differed markedly in their breeding date and cohorts also differed in their average breeding date and breeding date plasticity. The plasticity of a cohort appeared to be due primarily to an interaction between the environmental conditions (climate and density) experienced at different ages rather than innate inter-cohort differences. Cohorts that expressed higher plasticity in breeding date experienced warmer El Niño springs in their second or third breeding season, suggesting that prior experience affects how well individuals responded to abnormal climatic conditions. Cohorts born into lower density populations also expressed higher plasticity in breeding date. Interactions between age, experience and environmental conditions have been reported previously for long-lived taxa. Our current results indicate that similar effects operate in a short-lived, temperate songbird.
authors: Center for Applied Conservation Research, 2424 Main Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. wilsonwa@interchange.ubc.ca
authors: Scott
authors: S
authors: Wilson
authors: D Ryan
authors: DR
authors: Norris
authors: Amy G
authors: AG
authors: Wilson
authors: Peter
authors: P
authors: Arcese
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D017753:Ecosystem; D005260:Female; D017752:Greenhouse Effect; D011156:Population Density; D012098:Reproduction / Q000502:physiology*; D012726:Sexual Behavior, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D046370:Sparrows / Q000502:physiology*
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 May 11;96(10):5565-9
references: 10318924
references: Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Sep;14(9):343-348
references: 10441307
references: Nature. 2001 May 17;411(6835):296-8
references: 11357129
references: Science. 2001 May 25;292(5521):1528-31
references: 11375487
references: Nature. 2002 Mar 28;416(6879):389-95
references: 11919621
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jun 7;269(1496):1153-9
references: 12061959
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Sep 29;357(1425):1285-98
references: 12396519
references: Nature. 2002 Nov 14;420(6912):168-71
references: 12432390
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 16;100(19):11139-42
references: 12960365
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Oct 22;270(1529):2087-96
references: 14561270
references: Am Nat. 2003 Dec;162(6):754-67
references: 14737713
references: Evolution. 2005 Jun;59(6):1362-71
references: 16050111
references: Science. 2005 Oct 14;310(5746):304-6
references: 16224020
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 May 22;273(1591):1173-81
references: 16720388
references: J Anim Ecol. 2006 Jan;75(1):221-7
references: 16903059
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Nov 7;273(1602):2713-9
references: 17015329
references: Oecologia. 2002 Nov;133(3):315-324
references: 28466220