title: A detailed transcript-level probe annotation reveals alternative splicing based microarray platform differences.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Microarrays are a popular tool used in experiments to measure gene expression levels. Improving the reproducibility of microarray results produced by different chips from various manufacturers is important to create comparable and combinable experimental results. Alternative splicing has been cited as a possible cause of differences in expression measurements across platforms, though no study to this point has been conducted to show its influence in cross-platform differences.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Using probe sequence data, a new microarray probe/transcript annotation was created based on the AceView Aug05 release that allowed for the categorization of genes based on their expression measurements' susceptibility to alternative splicing differences across microarray platforms. Examining gene expression data from multiple platforms in light of the new categorization, genes unsusceptible to alternative splicing differences showed higher signal agreement than those genes most susceptible to alternative splicing differences. The analysis gave rise to a different probe-level visualization method that can highlight probe differences according to transcript specificity.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The results highlight the need for detailed probe annotation at the transcriptome level. The presence of alternative splicing within a given sample can affect gene expression measurements and is a contributing factor to overall technical differences across platforms.
authors: Genomics Core Laboratory, National Institute of Diabetes & Digestive & Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. jclee8@gmail.com
authors: Joseph C
authors: JC
authors: Lee
authors: David
authors: D
authors: Stiles
authors: Jun
authors: J
authors: Lu
authors: Margaret C
authors: MC
authors: Cam
mesh_terms: D017398:Alternative Splicing; D016000:Cluster Analysis; D015342:DNA Probes / Q000032:analysis*; D030541:Databases, Genetic; D020869:Gene Expression Profiling; D005796:Genes; D006801:Humans; D046228:Microarray Analysis; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014407:Tumor Cells, Cultured
chemical_list: D015342:DNA Probes
references: BMC Genomics. 2005;6:63
references: 15876355
references: BMC Bioinformatics. 2005;6:107
references: 15850491
references: BMC Genomics. 2006;7:153
references: 16776839
references: Genome Biol. 2006;7 Suppl 1:S12.1-14
references: 16925834
references: Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Sep;24(9):1151-61
references: 16964229
references: Mol Syst Biol. 2006;2:63
references: 17102808
references: BMC Bioinformatics. 2007;8:108
references: 17394657
references: Genome Res. 1999 Dec;9(12):1288-93
references: 10613851
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Jul 1;29(13):2850-9
references: 11433032
references: Science. 2002 May 3;296(5569):916-9
references: 11988577
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Feb 15;31(4):e15
references: 12582260
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Oct 1;31(19):5676-84
references: 14500831
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(9):e74
references: 15161944
references: BMC Bioinformatics. 2004 Aug 14;5:111
references: 15310390
references: BMC Genomics. 2004 Sep 2;5:61
references: 15345031
references: Genome Biol. 2004;5(10):R73
references: 15461792
references: Genome Biol. 2004;5(10):R74
references: 15461793
references: Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Jan 1;33(Database issue):D501-4
references: 15608248
references: J Comput Biol. 2004;11(5):945-70
references: 15700411
references: Lancet. 2005 Feb 5-11;365(9458):454-5
references: 15705441
references: Nat Methods. 2005 May;2(5):337-44
references: 15846360
references: Nat Methods. 2005 May;2(5):345-50
references: 15846361
references: Genomics. 2005 Jun;85(6):657-65
references: 15885493
references: Trends Genet. 2006 Feb;22(2):101-9
references: 16380191