Influence of gravitoinertial force level on the subjective vertical during recumbent yaw axis body tilt.
We tilted recumbent subjects at various angles about their yaw (foot to head) axis and had them indicate the direction of their subjective vertical and apparent head midline about the same axis. One set of tests was conducted during parabolic flight maneuvers where the background gravitoinertial acceleration varied from 0 to 1.8g. The blindfolded subjects (n = 6) were tested supine and at tilts of 60 degrees and 30 degrees left and right about their horizontal long body axis. They used a gravity neutral joystick to indicate their subjective vertical or their head midline continuously from the high force through the 0g portions of parabolas. In 0g, all subjects felt supine and oriented the joystick perpendicular to their body when indicating the subjective vertical. This points to strong influences of the symmetric somatic touch and pressure cues from the apparatus on orientation when the otolith organs are unloaded. In contrast to the settings in 0g, settings of the subjective vertical in 1g and 1.8g varied as a function of body orientation. However, the settings did not differ between 1g and 1.8g test conditions. Subjective vertical judgments were also made by subjects (n = 11) in the Brandeis slow rotation room, with the room stationary and rotating at a speed that produced a 2g resultant of gravitational and centrifugal acceleration. There were no differences between settings of the subjective vertical made in 1g and 2g. The similarity of 1g and hyper-g settings during recumbent yaw tilts, both in parabolic flight and in the rotating room, contrasts with the previously observed, strong influence which force levels above 1g have on settings of the subjective vertical during tilt of the body in pitch or roll. The findings for all three axes are consistent with a recently developed model of static spatial orientation.
Bryan
A S
AS
Ashton Graybiel Spatial Orientation Laboratory, Brandeis University, MS 033, Waltham, MA, 02454-9110, USA.
Bortolami
S B
SB
Ventura
J
J
DiZio
P
P
Lackner
J R
JR
D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D018466:Gravity Sensing / Q000502:physiology*; D019416:Head Movements / Q000502:physiology; D018594:Human Body; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009949:Orientation; D010037:Otolithic Membrane / Q000502:physiology; D004856:Postural Balance / Q000502:physiology*; D011187:Posture / Q000502:physiology*
Aerosp Med. 1967 Nov;38(11):1099-103
6057306
J Neurophysiol. 2000 Jul;84(1):11-27
10899179
Exp Brain Res. 1995;106(1):123-34
8542968
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Aug;173(3):374-88
16628400
Acta Astronaut. 2005 May-Jun;56(9-12):1025-32
15838949
J Exp Psychol. 1962 Mar;63:294-301
13879665
Aeromed Acta. 1963-1964;9:45-91
14284242
J Neurophysiol. 2004 May;91(5):2205-14
14668294
Exp Brain Res. 2001 Jun;138(4):410-8
11465738
J Neurosci. 1999 Jan 1;19(1):316-27
9870961
Brain Res Bull. 1996;40(5-6):393-7; discussion 397-8
8886364
J Vestib Res. 1990-1991;1(2):199-209
1670153
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Jun;85(6):2455-60
11387391
Science. 1979 Nov 30;206(4422):1105-8
493998
J Vestib Res. 1993 Fall;3(3):361-72
8275269
Naturwissenschaften. 1983 Jun;70(6):272-81
6877388
Am J Psychol. 1964 Sep;77:451-6
14198668
Aerosp Med. 1964 Aug;35:764-72
14215796
Acta Astronaut. 1992 Jul;27:1-9
11537572
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1992 May 22;656:124-39
1599138
Exp Brain Res. 2006 Aug;173(3):364-73
16628401
Hum Physiol. 1996 May;21(4):344-51
11541519
News Physiol Sci. 2001 Oct;16:234-8
11572928
Biol Cybern. 2002 Mar;86(3):191-207
12068786
Perception. 1992;21(6):803-12
1297983
J Exp Psychol. 1966 Mar;71(3):452-60
5908830
Acta Otolaryngol. 1968;:Suppl 230:1-20
5650275
Biol Cybern. 2002 Mar;86(3):209-30
12068787
J Gravit Physiol. 1997 Jul;4(2):P5-8
11540697
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1976 Feb;47(2):159-64
1082746
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Feb;87(2):819-33
11826049