title: Difficulty in evoking odor images: the role of odor naming.
abstract: Many studies report that people have difficulty in evoking odor images. In this article, we explore whether this results from another commonly observed phenomenon, difficulty in naming odors. In Experiment 1, participants both named and attempted to imagine either odors or their common visual referents. More-difficult-to-name odors were reported as being more difficult to evoke as olfactory images, in comparison with the visual condition. In Experiment 2, participants received training prior to forming odor images and naming the same set of odors. As in Experiment 1, more-difficult-to-name odors were harder to imagine, but participants who had learned the odor names during training were significantly better, by their own report, at imagining many of these stimuli, relative to participants who were either exposed to the odors, exposed to their names, or who received no pretraining. In sum, these experiments suggest that odor naming may account for some of the difficulty reported by participants when attempting to evoke odor images; we discuss an associative basis for this effect.
authors: Department of Psychology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia. richard.stevenson@psy.mq.edu.au
authors: Richard J
authors: RJ
authors: Stevenson
authors: Trevor I
authors: TI
authors: Case
authors: Mehmet
authors: M
authors: Mahmut
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007092:Imagination; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory; D008875:Middle Aged; D009812:Odorants; D014796:Visual Perception; D014825:Vocabulary
references: Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1999;23 (3):391-8
references: 9989426
references: Neurology. 1958 Apr;8(4):250-60
references: 13541589
references: Chem Senses. 2001 Jun;26(5):551-76
references: 11418502
references: Acta Psychol (Amst). 1997 Feb;95(2):195-214
references: 9062065
references: Psychol Rev. 2003 Apr;110(2):340-64
references: 12747527
references: Chem Senses. 2005 Jul;30(6):521-9
references: 16030076
references: Dev Psychol. 2003 Jul;39(4):670-9
references: 12859121
references: Br J Psychol. 1973 Feb;64(1):17-24
references: 4742442
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1991 Nov;17 (4):1104-19
references: 1837300
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Apr;12(2):244-64
references: 16082803
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Mar;7(3):109-111
references: 12639690
references: Psychol Sci. 2004 Mar;15(3):143-8
references: 15016284
references: Chem Senses. 1996 Feb;21(1):35-44
references: 8646490
references: Percept Mot Skills. 1969 Aug;29(1):203-15
references: 5355036
references: Science. 1979 Feb 2;203(4379):467-70
references: 760202
references: J Consult Psychol. 1960 Aug;24:349-54
references: 13813058
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1977 Jan;3(1):52-9
references: 845551
references: Chem Senses. 2005 May;30(4):353-65
references: 15821260
references: J Gen Psychol. 1947 Oct;37(2):199
references: 20270231
references: Chem Senses. 1998 Jun;23 (3):309-26
references: 9669044
references: Network. 2000 Feb;11(1):83-102
references: 10735530
references: J Clin Psychol. 1967 Jul;23(3):386-9
references: 6082130
references: Trends Neurosci. 1989 Jul;12(7):258-64
references: 2475938
references: Trends Neurosci. 2003 May;26(5):243-7
references: 12744840
references: Arch Neurol. 1983 Jul;40(7):459
references: 6860193
references: Nat Neurosci. 2003 Nov;6(11):1142-4
references: 14566343
references: Chem Senses. 2004 Mar;29(3):199-208
references: 15047594