title: Illusory colors promote interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.
abstract: When dissimilar monocular images are presented separately to each of a person's eyes, these images compete for visual dominance, with dominance of one image or the other alternating over time. While this phenomenon, called binocular rivalry, transpires, local image features distributed over space and between the eyes can become visually dominant at the same time; the resulting global figure implicates interocular grouping. Previous studies have suggested that color tends to influence the incidence of global dominance; in this study, we assess whether illusory color can also influence interocular grouping. To test this, we exploited the McCollough effect, an orientation-contingent color aftereffect induced by prolonged adaptation to different colors paired with different orientations. Results show that during binocular rivalry, illusory colors induced by the McCollough adaptation enhance strong interocular grouping relative to preadaptation testing, to an extent comparable in strength with the enhancement induced by real colors. Thus, illusory colors that are present only in an observer's mind are sufficiently potent to influence low-level visual processes such as binocular rivalry.
authors: Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, USA. chai-youn.kim@vanderbilt.edu
authors: Chai-Youn
authors: CY
authors: Kim
authors: Randolph
authors: R
authors: Blake
mesh_terms: D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D003118:Color Perception; D006801:Humans; D009903:Optical Illusions; D015348:Vision, Binocular; D014792:Visual Acuity
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Dec 24;93(26):15508-11
references: 8986842
references: Cortex. 2006 Feb;42(2):195-203
references: 16683493
references: Nature. 1986 Apr 10-16;320(6062):525-6
references: 3960135
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1975 Nov;1(4):323-7
references: 1185119
references: Curr Biol. 2004 Mar 9;14(5):418-23
references: 15028218
references: J Physiol. 2005 Sep 1;567(Pt 2):665-71
references: 15975983
references: Percept Mot Skills. 2003 Jun;96(3 Pt 2):1265-80
references: 12929781
references: Am J Psychol. 1972 Jun;85(2):227-35
references: 5040618
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2001 May 7;268(1470):979-83
references: 11370973
references: Psychol Sci. 2004 Apr;15(4):277-81
references: 15043648
references: Perception. 2000;29(4):461-80
references: 10953765
references: Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1992 Apr;12(2):168-70
references: 1408166
references: Vision Res. 1978;18(9):1201-15
references: 716240
references: Vision Res. 1973 Feb;13(2):505-9
references: 4692541
references: Nature. 1990 Nov 22;348(6299):328-31
references: 2250703
references: J Opt Soc Am A. 1989 Apr;6(4):590-602
references: 2709196
references: Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Aug;9(8):381-8
references: 16006172
references: Conscious Cogn. 1998 Sep;7(3):494-519
references: 9787058
references: Am J Psychol. 1954 Sep;67(3):513-6
references: 13207445
references: Science. 1965 Sep 3;149(3688):1115-6
references: 17737844
references: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Jan;3(1):13-21
references: 11823801
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Mar 19;99(6):4127-31
references: 11904456
references: Vision Res. 1990;30(12):1955-70
references: 2288100
references: Perception. 2000;29(12):1437-45
references: 11257967
references: Percept Psychophys. 1989 Jan;45(1):15-20
references: 2913564
references: Vision Res. 2001 Sep;41(20):2669-76
references: 11520512