Intrauterine programming of bone. Part 2: alteration of skeletal structure.
Osteoporosis is believed to be partly programmed in utero. Rat dams were given a low protein diet during pregnancy, and offspring were studied at different ages. Old aged rats showed site-specific strength differences. In utero nutrition has consequences in later life.


BACKGROUND
Epidemiological studies suggest skeletal growth is programmed during intrauterine and early postnatal life. We hypothesize that age-related decrease in bone mass has, in part, a fetal origin and investigated this using a rat model of maternal protein insufficiency.


METHODS
Dams received either 18% w/w (control) or w/w 9% (low protein) diet during pregnancy, and the offspring were studied at selected time points (4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 47, 75 weeks).


RESULTS
Using micro-CT, we found that at 75 weeks of age female offspring from mothers fed a restricted protein diet during pregnancy had femoral heads with thinner, less dense trabeculae, femoral necks with closer packed trabeculae, vertebrae with thicker, denser trabeculae and midshaft tibiae with denser cortical bone. Mechanical testing showed the femoral heads and midshaft tibiae to be structurally weaker, whereas the femoral necks and vertebrae were structurally stronger.


CONCLUSIONS
Offspring from mothers fed a restricted protein diet during pregnancy displayed significant differences in bone structure and density at various sites. These differences result in altered bone characteristics indicative of significantly altered bone turnover. These results further support the need to understand the key role of the nutritional environment in early development on programming of skeletal development and consequences in later life.
Lanham
S A
SA
Bone and Joint Research Group, Developmental Origins of Health and Disease, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD, UK. S.A.Lanham@soton.ac.uk.
Roberts
C
C
Perry
M J
MJ
Cooper
C
C
Oreffo
R O C
RO
D015502:Absorptiometry, Photon; D000375:Aging / Q000502:physiology; D000818:Animals; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D015519:Bone Density; D018753:Diet, Protein-Restricted; D005260:Female; D005269:Femur / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000254:growth & development / Q000503:physiopathology; D008297:Male; D010024:Osteoporosis / Q000196:embryology* / Q000503:physiopathology; D011247:Pregnancy; D011297:Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects; D039401:Prenatal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena; D051381:Rats; D017208:Rats, Wistar; D013131:Spine / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology; D013977:Tibia / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000254:growth & development / Q000503:physiopathology; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed
J Bone Miner Res. 2000 Aug;15(8):1555-63
10934654
J Bone Miner Res. 1995 Jun;10 (6):940-7
7572318
Cell. 2006 Apr 21;125(2):247-60
16630814
Am J Clin Nutr. 2000 May;71(5 Suppl):1344S-52S
10799412
Pediatr Res. 2006 Jun;59(6):784-9
16641213
Eur J Clin Nutr. 1992 Oct;46 Suppl 3:S3-9
1425543
Calcif Tissue Int. 2002 Dec;71(6):493-8
12202956
Osteoporos Int. 1998;8 Suppl 1:S37-42
9682796
Calcif Tissue Int. 2002 May;70(5):391-4
11960204
Science. 2004 Sep 17;305(5691):1733-6
15375258
Gerontology. 2001 Jan-Feb;47(1):9-14
11244286
JAMA. 2001 Feb 14;285(6):785-95
11176917
Cardiovasc Res. 2002 Oct;56(1):145-53
12237175
Ann Rheum Dis. 1997 Jan;56(1):17-21
9059135
Clin Sci (Lond). 1996 Nov;91(5):607-15
8942400
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998 Jan;83(1):135-9
9435430
J Bone Miner Res. 2004 Feb;19(2):177-82
14969386