title: Infant feeding attitudes and knowledge among socioeconomically disadvantaged women in Glasgow.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This study: (1) investigated infant feeding attitudes and knowledge among socioeconomically disadvantaged mothers in an urban community with historically low breastfeeding rates, (2) examined the influence of women's social networks on infant feeding attitudes and decisions, and (3) validated a measure of infant feeding attitudes and knowledge in this population (Iowa Infant Feeding Attitude Scale, IIFAS).
  
  
  METHODS
  Women attending a prenatal clinic (n=49) reported on: (1) demographics, (2) infant feeding attitudes and knowledge (IIFAS), (3) feeding intent, (4) opinions about breastfeeding in public, and (5) social networks. Feeding method at discharge was abstracted from hospital charts. Social network members (n=47) identified by the prenatal sample completed interviews covering: (1) demographics, (2) infant feeding attitudes and knowledge (IIFAS), (3) prior infant feeding methods and recommendations, and (4) opinions about breastfeeding in public.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Mean IIFAS scores were low in both groups, indicating neutral to negative breastfeeding attitudes; mothers' scores were lower than social network members. Higher maternal IIFAS score was significantly associated with intended and actual breastfeeding. A social network positive towards breastfeeding was significantly associated with mothers' positive attitude towards breastfeeding. Both mothers and social network members support breastfeeding in public. IIFAS internal consistency was robust for both mothers and social network members. Predictive validity was demonstrated by significant positive association between score and intended and actual feeding methods.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Knowledge and attitude predict breastfeeding initiation in this population. Social network members may influence mothers' feeding choices. This research is important because attitudes and knowledge derived from the IIFAS can be used to develop and evaluate breastfeeding promotion programs.
authors: Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Iowa, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA. c-dungy@uiowa.edu
authors: Claibourne I
authors: CI
authors: Dungy
authors: Rhona J
authors: RJ
authors: McInnes
authors: David M
authors: DM
authors: Tappin
authors: Anne Baber
authors: AB
authors: Wallis
authors: Florin
authors: F
authors: Oprescu
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001903:Bottle Feeding; D001942:Breast Feeding; D005260:Female; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006306:Health Surveys; D006801:Humans; D007182:Income; D007223:Infant; D007224:Infant Care; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D011203:Poverty; D011247:Pregnancy; D011295:Prenatal Care; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012606:Scotland; D012923:Social Class; D012944:Social Support; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014505:Urban Population
references: Acta Paediatr. 2005 Jul;94(7):832-7
references: 16188802
references: J Am Diet Assoc. 2004 Jul;104(7):1162-8
references: 15215778
references: Womens Health Issues. 2005 Mar-Apr;15(2):64-72
references: 15767196
references: J Hum Lact. 1992 Dec;8(4):199-203
references: 1288555
references: Health Bull (Edinb). 2001 Jan;59(1):29-36
references: 12811908
references: J Adv Nurs. 2000 Mar;31(3):651-60
references: 10718885
references: J Hum Lact. 2003 Aug;19(3):270-7
references: 12931778
references: Rep Health Soc Subj (Lond). 1994;45:1-113
references: 7701106
references: Lancet. 2002 Jul 20;360(9328):187-95
references: 12133652
references: Pediatrics. 1993 May;91(5):867-72
references: 8474804
references: Pediatrics. 2005 Feb;115(2):496-506
references: 15687461
references: J Hum Lact. 1995 Jun;11(2):103-9
references: 7619288
references: J Paediatr Child Health. 2001 Jun;37(3):254-61
references: 11468040
references: Pediatrics. 1990 Dec;86(6):874-82
references: 2251024
references: J Natl Med Assoc. 2004 Mar;96(3):325-31
references: 15040514
references: Pediatrics. 2002 Dec;110(6):1103-9
references: 12456906
references: Pediatrics. 1998 Jul;102(1 Pt 2):254-5
references: 9729162
references: Pediatr Clin North Am. 2001 Feb;48(1):105-23, ix
references: 11236719
references: BMC Public Health. 2001;1:10
references: 11710967
references: J Pediatr. 1986 Jun;108(6):887-96
references: 3712153
references: BMJ. 2001 Jun 2;322(7298):1335-6
references: 11387179
references: J R Soc Health. 1993 Aug;113(4):176-80
references: 8410907
references: J Pediatr. 1995 May;126(5 Pt 1):696-702
references: 7751991
references: J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1986 Dec;7(6):367-77
references: 3805294
references: Pediatrics. 1998 Jan;101(1):E9
references: 9417173
references: Arch Dis Child. 1994 Oct;71(4):376-80
references: 7979539
references: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1997 Jul;151(7):724-9
references: 9232049
references: Women Health. 1993;20(1):47-68
references: 8493799
references: J Assoc Acad Minor Phys. 1994;5(4):159-64
references: 7812084
references: Birth. 2004 Jun;31(2):125-31
references: 15153132
references: Int Breastfeed J. 2006 Jul 05;1:11
references: 16822298
references: J Hum Lact. 1999 Mar;15(1):27-34
references: 10578772
references: J Adv Nurs. 2004 Feb;45(3):260-8
references: 14720243
references: J Hum Lact. 1994 Mar;10(1):17-23
references: 7619242
references: BMJ. 1994 Mar 26;308(6932):824-5
references: 8167490
references: J Hum Lact. 2005 Aug;21(3):284-8
references: 16113017
references: J Fam Pract. 2000 Jun;49(6):529-33
references: 10923553
references: Pediatrics. 2006 Apr;117(4):e646-55
references: 16585281
references: Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2001 Jan;84(1):F23-7
references: 11124919