[Prosthetics of metacarpophalangeal joints].
Only a few of the large number of implants developed during the last decades for replacement of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint have proven to be reliable. The rates of loosening and mechanical failure of almost all types of constrained prostheses are so high that their use cannot be recommended at present. For more than 40 years silicone arthroplasty according to Swanson has been regarded as the gold standard in the prosthetic replacement of the MCP joint. In long-term studies this device provided good pain relief and a lasting correction of preoperative ulnar deviation. The degree of patient satisfaction continues to be high after more than 10 years. With the NeuFlex spacer, a modification of the original Swanson implant, a better range of motion and a reduction of wear-related problems is expected. In this study the results of 130 NeuFlex spacers after a mean time of 3.6 years were examined and 82% of the patients were completely pain free. The mobility of the joints improved from 40 degrees preoperatively to 54 degrees after 3.6 years. Radiologically periprosthetic erosions or osteolyses were seen in approximately 15% of implants. A minimal sinking of the stems developed in 24%, a massive one in 6% and 13% of the spacers were broken. Thus the use of the NeuFlex implant resulted in a better range of motion compared to the Swanson spacer, but the problem of radiological appearance remained unchanged. For unlinked prostheses sufficient soft tissue stability is mandatory as well as wear-resistant surface materials. The pyrocarbon prosthesis according to Beckenbaugh is the only implant for which long-term results are available. In a prospective study we evaluated 28 Ascension pyrocarbon prostheses with a mean follow-up of 4 years. Stability was not found to be a problem. Subjective results were satisfactory, the range of motion remained unchanged, however 46% of prosthesis stems exhibited radiolucent seams, 7 prostheses (25%) were rated as loose and 5 of those had to be replaced by a silicone implant. Use of the implant was abandoned, as it was unreliable regarding bony fixation. There are promising concepts in some new prostheses but independent data are still lacking.
Hilker
A
A
Klinik für Rheumaorthopädie, Handchirurgie und Endoprothetik, Orthopädische Klinik Volmarstein, Lothar-Gau-Strasse 11, 58300, Wetter, Germany. hilkera@esv.de
Miehlke
R-K
RK
Schmidt
K
K
D001172:Arthritis, Rheumatoid / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery*; D019544:Equipment Failure Analysis; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006227:Hand Deformities, Acquired / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D007593:Joint Instability / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery; D007595:Joint Prosthesis; D008662:Metacarpophalangeal Joint / Q000601:surgery*; D009048:Motor Skills / Q000502:physiology; D010147:Pain Measurement; D010149:Postoperative Pain / Q000503:physiopathology; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011859:Radiography; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular / Q000502:physiology; D012086:Reoperation; D012828:Silicones
D012828:Silicones
Chir Main. 2005 Jun-Aug;24(3-4):161-4
16121621
Z Rheumatol. 1997 Oct;56(5):287-97
9465382
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2005 Feb;37(1):7-12
15744651
J Orthop Res. 1985;3(2):202-11
3998897
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1986;20(2):207-18
3798034
J Hand Surg Br. 2005 Feb;30(1):8-13
15620485
Acta Orthop Belg. 1988;54(2):196-209
3188887
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2005 Feb;37(1):35-9
15744655
J Hand Surg Br. 1998 Oct;23(5):574-7
9821596
Orthopade. 2003 Sep;32(9):784-8
14508643
J Hand Surg Br. 1995 Oct;20(5):707-15
8543886
Orthopade. 2003 Sep;32(9):770-8
14508641
J Hand Surg Br. 1995 Apr;20(2):125-36
7797958
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2005 Feb;37(1):13-7
15744652
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 May;81(5):635-48
10360692
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Jan;75(1):3-12
8419388
Surg Clin North Am. 1968 Oct;48(5):1113-27
4879121
Orthopade. 2005 Jan;34(1):12-20
15616808
Hand Clin. 2006 May;22(2):177-82
16701130
Acta Orthop Scand. 1999 Apr;70(2):109-15
10366907
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2005 Feb;37(1):2-6
15744650
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2005 Feb;37(1):18-25
15744653
Orthopade. 2003 Sep;32(9):789-93
14508644
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1975 Jun;57(4):484-9
1141257
Tissue Eng. 2003 Oct;9(5):957-65
14633380
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 2006;40(1):49-53
16428214
J Hand Surg Br. 2005 Feb;30(1):3-7
15620484
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 1996 Sep;28(5):254-64
9026492
J Hand Surg Am. 2004 Jul;29(4):646-53
15249089
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Sep;(342):11-5
9308518
J Hand Surg Am. 2005 Jul;30(4):667-72
16039355
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1999;119(3-4):190-4
10392517
J Hand Surg Br. 1999 Oct;24(5):561-4
10597932
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1976 Jun;58(4):483-7
1270467
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Sep;(342):22-33
9308520
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997 Sep;(342):16-21
9308519
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Oct;85-A(10 ):1869-78
14563791
Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir. 2005 Feb;37(1):26-34
15744654
Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1999 Dec;33(4):433-8
10614754
Orthopedics. 1983 Aug 1;6(8):952-61
24823211
Ann Rheum Dis. 1968 May;27(3):207-18
18623878