title: Computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: definitive or detrimental?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Utilization of computed tomography (CT) scans in patients with presumed appendicitis was evaluated at a single institution to determine the sensitivity of this diagnostic test and its effect on clinical outcome.
  
  
  METHODS
  Adult patients (age > 17 years) with appendicitis were identified from hospital records. Findings at surgery, including the incidence of perforation, were correlated with imaging results.
  
  
  RESULTS
  During a 3-year period, 411 patients underwent appendectomy for presumed acute appendicitis at our institution. Of these patients, 256 (62%) underwent preoperative CT, and the remaining 155 (38%) patients did not have imaging before the surgery. The time interval between arrival in the emergency room to time in the operating room was longer for patients who had preoperative imaging (8.2 +/- 0.3 h) compared to those who did not (5.1 +/- 0.2 h, p < 0.001). Moreover, this possible delay in intervention was associated with a higher rate of appendiceal perforation in the CT group (17 versus 8%, p = 0.017).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Preoperative CT scanning in patients with presumed appendicitis should be used selectively as widespread utilization may adversely affect outcomes. The potential negative impact of CT imaging includes a delay in operative intervention and a potentially higher perforation rate.
authors: Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, H4/752 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792, USA.
authors: Sandeepa
authors: S
authors: Musunuru
authors: Herbert
authors: H
authors: Chen
authors: Layton F
authors: LF
authors: Rikkers
authors: Sharon M
authors: SM
authors: Weber
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001062:Appendectomy; D001064:Appendicitis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000601:surgery; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007416:Intestinal Perforation / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D008297:Male; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D016896:Treatment Outcome
references: J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Mar;202(3):401-6
references: 16500243
references: J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Dec;203(6):849-56
references: 17116553
references: Arch Surg. 2001 May;136(5):556-62
references: 11343547
references: Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Aug;10(8):823-9
references: 12896881
references: Am J Surg. 2000 May;179(5):379-81
references: 10930484
references: Dig Surg. 2003;20(3):215-9; discussion 220-1
references: 12759501
references: Radiology. 2002 Oct;225(1):131-6
references: 12354996
references: Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2003 Fall;4(3):231-9
references: 14588157
references: Ann Surg. 2006 Nov;244(5):656-60
references: 17060754
references: N Engl J Med. 1998 Jan 15;338(3):141-6
references: 9428814
references: Am Surg. 2005 Oct;71(10 ):803-8
references: 16468523
references: Am Fam Physician. 2005 Jan 1;71(1):71-8
references: 15663029
references: J Surg Res. 2002 Jul;106(1):131-6
references: 12127818
references: Am Surg. 2002 Nov;68(11):1003-7
references: 12455796
references: Arch Surg. 2004 May;139(5):495-9; discussion 499-500
references: 15136349
references: Am J Surg. 2000 Dec;180(6):450-4; discussion 454-5
references: 11182396
references: Br J Surg. 2004 Dec;91(12 ):1641-5
references: 15386320
references: Am Surg. 2006 Apr;72 (4):326-9
references: 16676857