Pathways of disadvantage and smoking careers: evidence and policy implications.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate in older industrialised societies (a) how social disadvantage contributes to smoking risk among women (b) the role of social and economic policies in reducing disadvantage and moderating wider inequalities in life chances and living standards.


METHODS
Review and analysis of (a) the effects of disadvantage in childhood and into adulthood on women's smoking status in early adulthood (b) policy impacts on the social exposures associated with high smoking risk.


RESULTS
(a) Smoking status--ever smoking, current smoking, heavy smoking, and cessation--is influenced not only by current circumstances but by longer term biographies of disadvantage (b) social and economic policies shape key social predictors of women's smoking status, including childhood circumstances, educational levels and adult circumstances, and moderate inequalities in the distribution of these dimensions of life chances and living standards. Together, the two sets of findings argue for a policy toolkit that acts on the distal determinants of smoking, with interventions targeting the conditions in which future and current smokers live.


CONCLUSIONS
An approach to tobacco control is advocated that combines changing smoking habits with reducing inequalities in the social trajectories in which they are embedded. Policies to level up opportunities and living standards across the lifecourse should be championed as part of an equity oriented approach to reducing the disease burden of cigarette smoking.
Graham
Hilary
H
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, UK. hmg501@york.ac.uk
Inskip
Hazel M
HM
Francis
Brian
B
Harman
Juliet
J
D000328:Adult; D002648:Child; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011203:Poverty; D011640:Public Policy; D012907:Smoking; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D013660:Taxes; D035862:Vulnerable Populations; D014930:Women
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2005 Jun;29(3):279-84
15991779
Am J Public Health. 2005 Jul;95(7):1252-8
15983277
Am J Public Health. 1989 Feb;79(2):152-7
2913832
Addiction. 2003 Dec;98(12):1765-72
14651509
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006 Mar;60(3):228-33
16476753
Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Feb;35(1):42-8
16195252
Am J Public Health. 2004 Feb;94(2):269-78
14759942
JAMA. 1989 Jan 6;261(1):56-60
2908995
Am J Public Health. 1994 Jul;84(7):1086-93
8017530
Soc Sci Med. 1996 Jul;43(2):243-54
8844928
Health Educ Res. 1999 Oct;14(5):611-8
10510069
Soc Sci Med. 1996 Oct;43(7):1083-95
8890409
Hum Nat. 1990 Jun;1(2):123-43
24222049
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2002 Mar;56(3):167-70
11854334
Am J Public Health. 2004 Feb;94(2):279-85
14759943
Health Promot Int. 2001 Dec;16(4):355-65
11733454
JAMA. 2000 Jan 19;283(3):361-6
10647799
Br J Sociol. 2001 Sep;52(3):495-517
11578006
Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Apr;34(2):335-44
15659473
BMJ. 2000 Apr 22;320(7242):1102-7
10775217
Ann Epidemiol. 2002 Apr;12(3):141-50
11897171
BMJ. 1994 Oct 8;309(6959):923-7
7950662
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1998 Dec;52(12):794-801
10396520
Am J Public Health. 1996 Feb;86(2):231-6
8633741
Soc Sci Med. 1994 May;38(10):1449-60
8023194
BMJ. 2002 Jun 15;324(7351):1426
12065267
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1999 Dec;53(12):757-64
10656084
BMJ. 1996 Dec 7;313(7070):1434-8
8973230
Lancet. 2000 Sep 23;356(9235):1093-8
11009159
Fam Plann Perspect. 2001 Nov-Dec;33(6):251-8, 289
11804434