title: Reproducibility of goniometric measurement of the knee in the in-hospital phase following total knee arthroplasty.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The objective of the present study was to assess interobserver reproducibility (in terms of reliability and agreement) of active and passive measurements of knee RoM using a long arm goniometer, performed by trained physical therapists in a clinical setting in total knee arthroplasty patients, within the first four days after surgery.
  
  
  METHODS
  Test-retest analysis.
  
  
  METHODS
  University hospital departments of orthopaedics and physical therapy.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two experienced physical therapists assessed 30 patients, three days after total knee arthroplasty.
  
  
  METHODS
  RoM measurement using a long-arm (50 cm) goniometer. Agreement was calculated as the mean difference between observers +/- 95% CI of this mean difference. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was calculated as a measure of reliability, based on two-way random effects analysis of variance.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The lowest level of agreement was that for measurement of passive flexion with the patient in supine position (mean difference 1.4 degrees ; limits of agreement 16.2 degrees to 19 degrees for the difference between the two observers. The highest levels of agreement were found for measurement of passive flexion with the patient in sitting position and for measurement of passive extension (mean difference 2.7 degrees ; limits of agreement -6.7 to 12.1 and mean difference 2.2 degrees ; limits of agreement -6.2 to 10.6 degrees, respectively). The ability to differentiate between subjects ranged from 0.62 for measurement of passive extension to 0.89 for measurements of active flexion (ICC values).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Interobserver agreement for flexion as well as extension was only fair. When two different observers assess the same patients in the acute phase after total knee arthroplasty using a long arm goniometer, differences in RoM of less than eight degrees cannot be distinguished from measurement error. Reliability was found to be acceptable for comparison on group level, but poor for individual comparisons over time.
authors: University Hospital Maastricht, Department of Physical Therapy, Maastricht, The Netherlands. alen@pmzl.azm.nl
authors: Anton F
authors: AF
authors: Lenssen
authors: Ellen M
authors: EM
authors: van Dam
authors: Yvonne H F
authors: YH
authors: Crijns
authors: Mark
authors: M
authors: Verhey
authors: Ruud J T
authors: RJ
authors: Geesink
authors: Piet A
authors: PA
authors: van den Brandt
authors: Rob A
authors: RA
authors: de Bie
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D053587:Arthrometry, Articular / Q000592:standards; D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Q000534:rehabilitation; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007297:Inpatients; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000503:physiopathology*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015588:Observer Variation; D020370:Osteoarthritis, Knee / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery; D011184:Postoperative Period; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D016683:Supine Position
references: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001 Mar;82(3):396-402
references: 11245764
references: Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 2005 Jan-Feb;143(1):25-9
references: 15754228
references: Qual Life Res. 2002 May;11(3):193-205
references: 12074258
references: J Arthroplasty. 2004 Apr;19(3):369-72
references: 15067653
references: BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2004 Jun 14;5:18
references: 15196309
references: Phys Ther. 1983 Oct;63(10):1611-5
references: 6622536
references: Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
references: 2868172
references: Phys Ther. 1987 Feb;67(2):192-5
references: 3809242
references: Phys Ther. 1987 Dec;67(12):1867-72
references: 3685114
references: Phys Ther. 1988 Nov;68(11):1676-8
references: 3186793
references: Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Jul;86(7):1356-61
references: 16003664
references: Physiother Res Int. 2006 Mar;11(1):35-47
references: 16594314
references: Phys Ther. 1991 Feb;71(2):90-6; discussion 96-7
references: 1989012
references: Phys Ther. 1991 Aug;71(8):589-622
references: 1852798
references: J Clin Epidemiol. 1995 Sep;48(9):1123-32
references: 7636514
references: Int J Epidemiol. 1995;24 Suppl 1:S7-14
references: 7558556
references: Physiother Res Int. 1997;2(3):150-66
references: 9421820
references: Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2001 Fall;17(4):479-87
references: 11758292