title: Giant haemangioma of the liver: is enucleation better than resection?
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Haemangioma is the most common liver tumour. Treatment is indicated for symptomatic tumours, rapid increase in size, rupture or doubt in diagnosis. There is continuing debate regarding the ideal method of surgical treatment for liver haemangiomas, with some surgeons favouring enucleation over liver resection.
  
  
  METHODS
  Retrospective analysis of prospectively compiled database of patients who were surgically treated for liver haemangioma.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Between 1987 and 2003, we operated on 21 patients with liver haemangioma. Pre-operative diagnosis on imaging was made in 16 patients (13 symptomatic, 3 had progressive increase in size). In five patients, the indication of surgery was uncertain diagnosis. Enucleation was performed in 9 patients and liver resection in 12. The size of the haemangioma was similar in the enucleation and resection groups (8.9 cm versus 10 cm; P = 0.85). The mean intra-operatiive blood loss was significantly less in the enucleation group (400 ml versus 1330 ml; P = 0.004). The mean operative time was significantly less in the enucleation group as compared to the resection group (170 min versus 230 min; P = 0.035). Five patients had major postoperative morbidity in the resection group as compared to none in the enucleation group (P = 0.045). The duration of hospital stay was significantly longer in the resection group.(9.9 days versus 5.6 days; P = 0.005).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Enucleation of liver haemangiomas is safer, quicker and associated with less morbidity than liver resection. Except for some situations, such as uncertain diagnosis or total replacement of a lobe, we recommend enucleation as the surgical procedures of choice for the treatment of hepatic haemangiomas.
authors: Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
authors: Rajneesh Kumar
authors: RK
authors: Singh
authors: Sorabh
authors: S
authors: Kapoor
authors: Peush
authors: P
authors: Sahni
authors: Tushar K
authors: TK
authors: Chattopadhyay
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D006392:Hemangioma, Cavernous / Q000601:surgery*; D006498:Hepatectomy / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D008113:Liver Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012189:Retrospective Studies
references: Abdom Imaging. 2001 Sep-Oct;26(5):510-4
references: 11503090
references: Hepatogastroenterology. 2001 May-Jun;48(39):770-6
references: 11462922
references: Br J Surg. 2002 Oct;89(10):1240-4
references: 12296890
references: Int J Gastrointest Cancer. 2001;30(3):141-6
references: 12540026
references: Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2003 Jan-Feb;26(1):92-6
references: 12522645
references: Dig Dis Sci. 2003 May;48(5):916-20
references: 12772790
references: J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Sep;197(3):392-402
references: 12946794
references: Arch Surg. 2004 Aug;139(8):818-21; discussion 821-3
references: 15302689
references: Ann Surg. 1970 Aug;172(2):239-45
references: 5433290
references: Med Clin North Am. 1975 Jul;59(4):995-1013
references: 167242
references: HPB Surg. 1991 May;4(1):69-78; discussion 78-9
references: 1911479
references: Am Surg. 1995 Nov;61(11):1019-22
references: 7486416
references: Br J Surg. 1997 Mar;84(3):314-6
references: 9117293
references: HPB Surg. 1997;10(5):299-304
references: 9298384
references: Liver Transpl Surg. 1996 May;2(3):192-9
references: 9346648
references: Arch Surg. 1999 Apr;134(4):407-11
references: 10199314
references: World J Surg. 2005 Jul;29(7):890-3
references: 15951941
references: Arch Surg. 2000 Aug;135(8):978-81
references: 10922262
references: Arch Surg. 2001 Sep;136(9):1033-8
references: 11529826