Phenolic chemistry of coast live oak response to Phytophthora ramorum infection.
Since the mid 1990s, Phytophthora ramorum has been responsible for the widespread mortality of tanoaks, as well as several oak species throughout California and Oregon forests. However, not all trees die, even in areas with high disease pressure, suggesting that some trees may be resistant to the pathogen. In this study, the chemical basis of host resistance was investigated. Three field experiments were carried out in California between December 2004 and September 2005. The levels of nine phenolic compounds (gallic acid, catechin, tyrosol, a tyrosol derivative, ellagic acid, and four ellagic acid derivatives) extracted from the phloem of trees that had been either artificially inoculated with P. ramorum or trees putatively infected with P. ramorum (based on canker symptoms) were quantified by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Significant differences in phenolic profiles were found between phloem sampled from the active margins of cankers, healthy phloem from asymptomatic trees, and phloem sampled 60 cm away from canker sites, although the magnitude and direction of the responses was not consistent across all experiments. Concentrations of gallic acid, tyrosol, and ellagic acid showed the greatest differences in these different tissues, but varied considerably across treatments. Gallic acid and tyrosol were tested in in vitro bioassays and showed strong dose-dependent inhibitory effects against P. ramorum, P. cinnamomi, P. citricola, and P. citrophthora. These results suggest that phloem chemistry varies in response to pathogen infection in California coast live oak populations and that changes in phloem chemistry may be related to apparently resistant phenotypes observed in the field.
Ockels
Frances S
FS
Department of Plant Pathology, The Ohio State University, 201 Kottman Hall, 2021 Coffey Road, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Eyles
Alieta
A
McPherson
Brice A
BA
Wood
David L
DL
Bonello
Pierluigi
P
D006790:Host-Parasite Interactions; D010636:Phenols / Q000378:metabolism* / Q000494:pharmacology; D052585:Phloem / Q000378:metabolism; D010838:Phytophthora / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology*; D029963:Quercus / Q000378:metabolism* / Q000469:parasitology*
D010636:Phenols
New Phytol. 1994 Aug;127(4):617-633
33874382
J Agric Food Chem. 2006 Oct 18;54(21):8314-21
17032045
New Phytol. 2005 Jan;165(1):203-14
15720634
Phytochemistry. 1997 Oct;46(3):473-8
9332025
Plant Dis. 2002 Mar;86(3):205-214
30818595
J Agric Food Chem. 1998 May;46(5):1887-1892
29072454
Tree Physiol. 2007 Apr;27(4):511-7
17241993
Annu Rev Phytopathol. 2005;43:309-35
16078887
Fortschr Chem Org Naturst. 1995;66:1-117
8847006
Phytochem Anal. 2001 Mar-Apr;12(2):120-7
11705240
J Chem Ecol. 2004 Sep;30(9):1693-711
15586669
J Chromatogr A. 2000 Sep 1;891(1):75-83
10999626
Phytopathology. 2005 May;95(5):587-96
18943326