Effect of crew resource management on diabetes care and patient outcomes in an inner-city primary care clinic.
BACKGROUND
Diabetes care in our inner-city primary care clinic was suboptimal, despite provider education and performance feedback targeting improved adherence to evidence-based clinical guidelines. A crew resource management (CRM) intervention (communication and teamwork, process and workflow organisation, and standardised information debriefings) was implemented to improve diabetes care and patient outcomes.


OBJECTIVE
To assess the effect of the CRM intervention on adherence to evidence-based diabetes care standards, work processes, standardised clinical communication and patient outcomes.


METHODS
Time-series analysis was used to assess the effect on the delivery of standard diabetes services and patient outcomes among medically indigent adults (n = 619).


RESULTS
The CRM principles were translated into useful process redesign and standardised care approaches. Significant improvements in microalbumin testing and associated patient outcome measures were attributed to the intervention.


CONCLUSIONS
The CRM approach provided tools for management that, in the short term, enabled reorganisation and prevention of service omissions and, in the long term, can produce change in the organisational culture for continuous improvement.
Taylor
Cathy R
CR
Vanderbilt University School of Nursing, Nashville, TN 37240, USA. cathy.taylor@vanderbilt.edu
Hepworth
Joseph T
JT
Buerhaus
Peter I
PI
Dittus
Robert
R
Speroff
Theodore
T
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003151:Community Health Centers / Q000592:standards*; D003920:Diabetes Mellitus / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000451:nursing*; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D005260:Female; D019983:Guideline Adherence; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009722:Nurse Practitioners; D015399:Nursing Research; D015279:Organizational Culture; D009936:Organizational Innovation; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; D010348:Patient Care Team / Q000592:standards*; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000592:standards*; D016730:Program Development; D015397:Program Evaluation; D012579:Schools, Nursing; D013714:Tennessee; D017749:Total Quality Management / Q000379:methods*
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):781-5
10720367
Hum Factors. 2006 Summer;48(2):392-412
16884057
JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1775-9
12365965
J Ambul Care Manage. 2003 Jan-Mar;26(1):22-35; discussion 36-8
12545513
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 26;348(26):2635-45
12826639
Diabetes Care. 2003 Sep;26(9):2670-4
12941736
Diabetes Care. 2004 Jan;27(1):2-8
14693957
Qual Manag Health Care. 2004 Jan-Mar;13(1):17-32
14976904
Health Aff (Millwood). 2004 May-Jun;23(3):247-56
15160823
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Jun 1;140(11):945-50
15172919
Ann Intern Med. 2004 Jun 1;140(11):978-84
15172924
Diabetes Care. 1998 Jan;21(1):160-78
9538988
BMJ. 1998 Sep 12;317(7160):703-13
9732337
Lancet. 1998 Sep 12;352(9131):837-53
9742976
Prev Chronic Dis. 2005 Jan;2(1):A17
15670470
Diabetes Care. 2005 Aug;28(8):1890-7
16043728
N Engl J Med. 2006 Mar 16;354(11):1147-56
16540615
Ann Intern Med. 2002 Apr 16;136(8):565-74
11955024