title: Protecting people in research: a comparison between biomedical and traffic research.
abstract: Traffic research shares a fundamental dilemma with other areas of empirical research in which humans are potentially put at risk. Research is justified because it can improve safety in the long run. Nevertheless, people can be harmed in the research situation. Hence, we need to balance short-term risks against long-term safety improvements, much as in other areas of research with human subjects. In this paper we focus on ethical issues that arise when human beings are directly affected in the performance of research by examining how the ethical requirements in biomedical research can inform traffic research. After introducing the basic ethical requirements on biomedical research, each of the major requirements is discussed in relation to traffic research. We identify the main areas where biomedical research and traffic research differ, and where the ethical requirements from the former cannot easily be transferred to the latter. Finally, we argue that there is a need for systematic studies of the ethics of traffic research and point to some of the issues that need to be addressed.
authors: Division of Philosophy, Royal Institute of Technology, Teknikringen 78 B, 100 44 Stockholm, Sweden. sara.svensson@infra.kth.se
authors: Sara
authors: S
authors: Svensson
authors: Sven Ove
authors: SO
authors: Hannson
mesh_terms: D000063:Accidents, Traffic / Q000517:prevention & control*; D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000941:ethics*; D036262:Empirical Research; D032984:Ethics, Research; D006381:Helsinki Declaration; D006805:Human Experimentation / Q000941:ethics*; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000941:ethics; D028662:Principle-Based Ethics; D012107:Research Design
references: J Med Ethics. 2001 Apr;27(2):126-9
references: 11314157
references: J Med Ethics. 1995 Dec;21(6):323-4
references: 8778453
references: Theor Med Bioeth. 2006;27(2):149-67
references: 16699965
references: Intensive Care Med. 2004 Sep;30(9):1723-9
references: 15232680
references: Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2001 Winter;10(1):72-7
references: 11326789
references: J Med Ethics. 2005 Feb;31(2):97-100
references: 15681674
references: Health Care Anal. 2003 Mar;11(1):27-40
references: 14510307
references: J Lab Clin Med. 1993 Aug;122(2):130-6
references: 8340698
references: J Am Coll Dent. 2014 Summer;81(3):4-13
references: 25951677
references: CMAJ. 1997 Dec 15;157(12):1691-2
references: 9418663