title: An application of item response mixture modelling to psychosis indicators in two large community samples.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Previous research has suggested that psychosis is better described as a continuum rather than a dichotomous entity. This study aimed to describe the distribution of positive psychosis-like symptoms in two large community samples using an item response mixture model.
  
  
  METHODS
  An item response mixture model was used to explain the pattern of psychosis-like symptom endorsement. This model incorporated two elements. First, a continuous non-normal latent variable to explain the observed pattern of data. Second, a categorical latent variable to explain the variation in the continuous non-normal latent variable.
  
  
  RESULTS
  For both samples, representing broadly and narrowly defined psychosis, the best fitting model was a four-class solution. In both cases, the classes differed quantitatively rather than qualitatively.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The analysis showed that psychosis-like symptoms at the population level could be best explained by four classes that appeared to represent an underlying continuum.
authors: School of Psychology, University of Ulster at Magee Campus, Londonderry, N Ireland. m.shevlin@ulster.ac.uk
authors: Mark
authors: M
authors: Shevlin
authors: Gary
authors: G
authors: Adamson
authors: Wilma
authors: W
authors: Vollebergh
authors: Ron
authors: R
authors: de Graaf
authors: Jim
authors: J
authors: van Os
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003625:Data Collection / Q000295:instrumentation; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009426:Netherlands / Q000453:epidemiology; D011594:Psychometrics; D011618:Psychotic Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000453:epidemiology; D012111:Residence Characteristics
references: Biometrics. 1999 Mar;55(1):117-28
references: 11318145
references: Schizophr Bull. 1999;25(3):553-76
references: 10478789
references: Psychol Med. 2005 Apr;35(4):499-510
references: 15856720
references: Br J Psychiatry. 2002 Feb;180:174-8
references: 11823331
references: Psychol Med. 2002 Feb;32(2):347-58
references: 11866327
references: Clin Psychol Rev. 2001 Nov;21(8):1125-41
references: 11702510
references: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992 Aug;49(8):624-9
references: 1637252
references: Biol Psychiatry. 1998 Jul 15;44(2):107-14
references: 9646892
references: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1991 Aug;48(8):764-70
references: 1883262
references: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1998 Dec;33(12):581-6
references: 9857790
references: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1996 Nov;53(11):1022-31
references: 8911225
references: Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2003 May;107(5):369-77
references: 12752033
references: Psychiatry Res. 2004 Jun 30;127(1-2):101-9
references: 15261709
references: Addict Behav. 2006 Jun;31(6):1050-66
references: 16675147
references: Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1998 Jun;55(6):492-9
references: 9633666
references: Schizophr Res. 2007 Jan;89(1-3):101-9
references: 17097273