Congruency effects in the letter search task: semantic activation in the absence of priming.
Semantic priming is typically eliminated when participants perform a letter search on the prime, suggesting that semantic activation is conditional upon one's attentional goals. However, in such studies, semantic activation (or the lack thereof) is not measured during the letter search task itself but, instead, is inferred on the basis of the responses given to a later target. In the present study, direct online evidence for semanticactivation was tested using words whose meaning should bias either a positive or a negative response (e.g.,present vs. absent). In Experiment 1, a semantic congruency effect was obtained, with faster responses when the word meaning matched the required response. Experiment 2 replicated the congruency effect while, simultaneously, showing the elimination of semantic priming. It is concluded that letter search does not affect the initiation of semantic activation. Possible accounts for the elimination of priming following letter search include activation-based suppression and transfer-inappropriate processing.
Hutchison
Keith A
KA
Department of Psychology, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717-3440, USA. khutch@montana.edu
Bosco
Frank A
FA
D000339:Affect; D006801:Humans; D008037:Linguistics; D011930:Reaction Time; D012660:Semantics; D014796:Visual Perception
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Sep;133(3):323-38
15355142
Conscious Cogn. 1997 Jun-Sep;6(2-3):204-18
9262409
Mem Cognit. 1994 Mar;22(2):157-68
8035692
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1983 Oct;9(4):697-712
6227683
Neuroreport. 2000 Aug 3;11(11):2401-7
10943693
Psychol Rev. 1998 Apr;105(2):203-29
9577237
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 Jul;19(4):813-40
8345326
Can J Exp Psychol. 2002 Jun;56(2):112-9
12066419
Psychon Bull Rev. 1997 Jun;4(2):221-5
21331828
Psychol Sci. 2004 Dec;15(12):852-7
15563331
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Sep;27(5):1289-98
11550755
Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Jun;11(3):458-62
15376795
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1979 May;5(2):239-51
528936
Mem Cognit. 1983 Jul;11(4):366-73
6633255
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Dec;24(6):1642-55
9861715
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1995 Apr;17(2):291-321
7629273
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1985 Nov;37(4):571-90
4081101
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 Sep;18(5):993-1000
1402720
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2000 Mar;9(2):137-46
10729697
Psychol Bull. 1991 Mar;109(2):163-203
2034749
Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Jun;3(2):249-53
24213876
Percept Psychophys. 1995 Jul;57(5):657-67
7644326
Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Dec;8(4):778-84
11848599
Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Mar;9(1):113-8
12026942
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1991 Aug;17(3):792-806
1834791
Am J Psychol. 2006 Summer;119(2):239-54
16841780
Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Dec;10(4):785-813
15000531
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Apr;26(2):469-79
10811157
Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Jun;8(2):324-30
11495121
Mem Cognit. 2002 Dec;30(8):1263-76
12661857
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997 Jun;23(3):845-60
9180046
J Exp Psychol. 1969 Aug;81(2):275-80
5811803
Q J Exp Psychol A. 2001 May;54(2):321-43
11394050
Mem Cognit. 2000 Jun;28(4):635-47
10946546
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 May;23(2-3):293-305
15820637