Sensitivity and specificity of echocardiographic evidence of tamponade: implications for ventricular interdependence and pulsus paradoxus.
The reported sensitivity of the echocardiographic finding of right atrial collapse for the diagnosis of tamponade ranges from 50% to100%; specificities have ranged from 33% to 100%. Its sensitivity in identifying right ventricular collapse ranges from 48% to 100% whereas the specificity ranges from 72% to 100%. Collapse of either the right atrium or right ventricle is not reliable except in cases where the risk of tamponade is high, consistent with Bayes' theorem. If the patient has hypotension, tachycardia, dyspnea, increased venous pressure, and a pericardial effusion, the diagnosis of tamponade will likely be sustained. To explain pulsus paradoxus, most echocardiographic reports have invoked Dornhorst's theory that inspiratory filling of the right ventricle actively collapses the left ventricle by successfully competing for a fixed total pericardial space ("ventricular interdependence"). However, the pericardial space is not fixed in tamponade but increases with inspiration, and the right heart is much more likely to collapse than the left, given their relative thickness. Pulsus paradoxus depends on the inspiratory surge to the right heart, exaggerated by the small stroke volume of both ventricles induced by tamponade, and vascular coupling between the pulmonary and systemic beds, with a transit time of one to two heart beats.
Guntheroth
W G
WG
Department of Pediatrics (Cardiology), University of Washington School of Medicine, Box 356320, Seattle, WA 98185, USA wgg@u.washington.edu
D002305:Cardiac Tamponade / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000503:physiopathology*; D003326:Coronary Circulation; D015150:Echocardiography, Doppler; D006352:Heart Ventricles / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology*; D006439:Hemodynamics; D006801:Humans; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013318:Stroke Volume / Q000502:physiology
Mod Concepts Cardiovasc Dis. 1983 Apr;52(4):19-23
6855745
Ital Heart J. 2003 Mar;4(3):186-92
12784745
Cardiovasc Res. 1990 Sep;24(9):768-76
2224943
Lancet. 1952 Apr 12;1(6711):746-8
14918423
J Lab Clin Med. 1964 Mar;63:431-44
14164497
Circ Res. 1965 Jun;16:493-8
14299501
Circulation. 1990 Oct;82(4):1370-6
2401070
J Clin Invest. 1965 Nov;44(11):1882-98
5843718
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Dec;12(6):1470-7
3192844
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Mar;11(3):572-8
3343460
Eur Heart J. 1986 May;7(5):431-6
3732292
Am J Cardiol. 1978 Dec;42(6):904-12
727141
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Sep;22(3):907-13
8354831
Am J Cardiol. 1982 Dec;50(6):1287-92
7148705
Circ Res. 1981 May;48(5):701-10
7214678
Circ Res. 1967 Apr;20(4):381-90
6025402
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 Nov;12(5):1231-6
3170965
J Appl Physiol. 1974 Jan;36(1):69-73
4809867
Circulation. 1977 Nov;56(5):774-9
912837
Am J Physiol. 1966 Apr;210(4):903-9
5906822
Circulation. 1983 Aug;68(2):294-301
6861307
JAMA. 1965 Mar 1;191:711-4
14245510
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1966 Apr;51(4):575-8
5931957
Cardiovasc Res. 1974 May;8(3):330-7
4278240
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1995 Jul-Aug;8(4):536-42
7546791
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1983 Oct;2(4):770-5
6886236
J Clin Invest. 1967 Nov;46(11):1744-55
6061747
Am J Cardiol. 1992 Oct 1;70(9):934-9
1529950
Mayo Clin Proc. 1989 Mar;64(3):312-24
2704254
Circulation. 1978 Aug;58(2):265-72
668074
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Jul 17;40(2):318-24
12106938
J Cardiol. 2001;37 Suppl 1:71-6
11433831
Am J Cardiol. 1991 Nov 1;68(11):1242-4
1951090
Anesthesiology. 1966 Sep-Oct;27(5):584-90
5331459
Circulation. 1993 May;87(5):1738-41
8491026
Am J Cardiol. 1970 Nov;26(5):480-9
5478837
Am J Physiol. 1990 Jul;259(1 Pt 2):H181-9
2375404
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988 May;11(5):1020-30
3281990