title: Can surgeons think and operate with haptics at the same time?
abstract: Much effort has been devoted to incorporating haptic feedback into surgical simulators. However, the benefits of haptics for novice trainees in the early stages of learning are not clear. Presumably, novices have less spare attentional resources to attend to haptic cues while learning basic laparoscopic skills. The aim of this study was to determine whether novice surgeons have adequate cognitive resources to attend to haptic information. Thirty surgical residents and attendings performed a TransferPlace task in a simulator, with and without haptics. Cognitive loading was imposed using a mental arithmetic task. Subjects performed 10 trials (five with cognitive loading and five without) with and without haptics. Results showed that all subjects performed significantly slower (27%) when they were cognitively loaded than unloaded, but equally accurately in both cases, suggesting a speed-accuracy tradeoff. On average, subjects performed 36% faster and 97% more accurately with haptics than without, even while cognitively loaded. Haptic feedback can not only enhance performance, but also counter the effect of cognitive load. This effect is greater for more experienced surgeons than less experienced ones, indicating greater spare cognitive capacity in surgeons with more experience.
authors: Department of Mechanical Engineering, Tufts University, 200 College Ave., Medford, MA 02155, USA. caroline.cao@tufts.edu
authors: Caroline G L
authors: CG
authors: Cao
authors: Mi
authors: M
authors: Zhou
authors: Daniel B
authors: DB
authors: Jones
authors: Steven D
authors: SD
authors: Schwaitzberg
mesh_terms: D002983:Clinical Competence; D003198:Computer Simulation; D005246:Feedback; D013502:General Surgery / Q000193:education*; D006801:Humans; D007396:Internship and Residency; D025321:Surgery, Computer-Assisted; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D014584:User-Computer Interface
references: Surgery. 2005 Jul;138(1):14-20
references: 16003310
references: Ann Surg. 2005 Jan;241(1):102-9
references: 15621997
references: Surg Endosc. 2005 Jan;19(1):95-100
references: 15772876
references: J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2006 Apr;16(2):94-8
references: 16646695
references: Eur Surg Res. 2006;38(2):109-13
references: 16699284
references: Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;119:288-92
references: 16404064
references: Ann Surg. 2002 Oct;236(4):458-63; discussion 463-4
references: 12368674
references: Surg Endosc. 2004 Jun;18(6):980-5
references: 15108104
references: Ann Surg. 2003 Apr;237(4):460-9
references: 12677139
references: Hum Factors. 2006 Fall;48(3):574-86
references: 17063970
references: J Am Coll Surg. 2000 Sep;191(3):272-83
references: 10989902
references: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1999 Oct;46(10):1212-21
references: 10513126
references: J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Oct;189(4):349-55
references: 10509459
references: Ergonomics. 2005 Jun 10;48(7):874-94
references: 16076743
references: J Am Coll Surg. 1995 Jan;180(1):101-25
references: 8000648
references: J Mot Behav. 2003 Mar;35(1):53-63
references: 12724099
references: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006 Jun;31(6):588-93
references: 16387517
references: Ann Surg. 2006 Mar;243(3):291-300
references: 16495690