title: Repetition priming affects guessing not familiarity.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The claim that recollection and familiarity based memory processes have distinct retrieval mechanisms is based partly on the observation that masked repetition and semantic priming influence estimates of familiarity derived from know responses but have no effect on estimates of recollection derived from remember responses. Close inspection of the experiments on which this claim is based reveal the effect size to be small, potentially the result of a type-2 error, and/or inflated due to participants not having the opportunity to report guesses. This paper re-evaluates these claims by attempting a partial replication of two such Experiments.
  
  
  METHODS
  In Experiment 1 participants made remember, know, and guess responses following primed and unprimed target words. In Experiment 2 participants made sure, unsure, and guess following primed and unprimed target words.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In Experiment 1 the repetition priming effect occurred only for guess responses and only for unstudied items. In Experiment 2 the priming effect occurred for both unsure and guess responses, but again only for unstudied items.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The data are consistent with the view that remembering and knowing do not correspond to confidence ratings; and suggest that contrary to earlier findings, recollection and familiarity do not differ in retrieval mechanisms. As such the effects of repetition priming on subjective reports of remembering should not be cited as evidence for the distinction between recollection and familiarity based memory processes.
authors: School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK. rjt@psychology.nottingham.ac.uk.
authors: Richard J
authors: RJ
authors: Tunney
authors: Gordon
authors: G
authors: Fernie
references: Mem Cognit. 2003 Oct;31(7):1060-71
references: 14704021
references: Conscious Cogn. 1998 Mar;7(1):1-26
references: 9521829
references: Behav Brain Sci. 1999 Jun;22(3):425-44; discussion 444-89
references: 11301518
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Apr;12(2):367-73
references: 16082820
references: Psychol Rev. 2004 Apr;111(2):524-42
references: 15065921
references: Mem Cognit. 1988 Jul;16(4):309-13
references: 3210971
references: Mem Cognit. 1993 Jan;21(1):89-102
references: 8433652
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000 Jul;26(4):1070-4
references: 10946380
references: Mem Cognit. 1990 Jan;18(1):23-30
references: 2314224
references: Neuropsychology. 1998 Jul;12(3):323-39
references: 9673991