title: How the harm reduction movement contrasts itself against punitive prohibition.
abstract: On the basis of the harm reduction movement's founding texts from the beginning of the 1990s, this paper reflects the movement's self-understanding in contrasting itself with the system of punitive prohibition. Following this is a discussion of the implications for drug users of harm reduction claims-making. The paper concludes that the principles of the harm reduction movement resonate extremely well with the moral sensibilities of our contemporary societies, and but that the movement's claims for an amoral, rational, just, and emancipating approach to drug use are to be seen rather as a powerful rhetorical intervention in the highly moralised landscape of drug debate than something that would be achieved in practice.
authors: Finnish Foundation for Alcohol Studies, Helsinki, Finland. tuukka.tammi@helsinki.fi <tuukka.tammi@helsinki.fi>
authors: Tuukka
authors: T
authors: Tammi
authors: Toivo
authors: T
authors: Hurme
mesh_terms: D004335:Drug and Narcotic Control / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D040261:Harm Reduction / Q000941:ethics*; D006806:Human Rights; D006801:Humans; D007391:International Cooperation; D008119:Lobbying; D009014:Morals; D011640:Public Policy; D019966:Substance-Related Disorders / Q000517:prevention & control* / Q000523:psychology