A case for a duty to feed the hungry: GM plants and the third world.
This article is concerned with a discussion of the plausibility of the claim that GM technology has the potential to provide the hungry with sufficient food for subsistence. Following a brief outline of the potential applications of GM in this context, a history of the green revolution and its impact will be discussed in relation to the current developing world agriculture situation. Following a contemporary analysis of malnutrition, the claim that GM technology has the potential to provide the hungry with sufficient nourishment will be discussed within the domain of moral philosophy to determine whether there exists a moral obligation to pursue this end if and only if the technology proves to be relatively safe and effective. By using Peter Singer's duty of moral rescue, I argue that we have a moral duty to assist the third world through the distribution of such GM plants. I conclude the paper by demonstrating that my argument can be supported by applying a version of the Precautionary Principle on the grounds that doing nothing might be worse for the current situation.
Carter
Lucy
L
The School of History, Philosophy, Religion and Classics, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. l.carter@uq.edu.au
D000383:Agriculture / Q000941:ethics / Q000639:trends; D003906:Developing Countries; D026689:Ethical Analysis; D030841:Food, Genetically Modified; D006801:Humans; D044342:Malnutrition / Q000517:prevention & control*; D028681:Moral Obligations
Nutr Rev. 1996 May;54(5):131-7
8783879
Nutr Rev. 2003 Jun;61(6 Pt 2):S124-34
12908744
Nat Biotechnol. 2001 Feb;19(2):93
11175684
EMBO Rep. 2001 Apr;2(4):256-8
11306538
Science. 2003 May 2;300(5620):758-62
12730592
Nutr Res Rev. 2004 Jun;17(1):23-42
19079913
Sci Am. 2004 Aug;291(2):42-9
15298118