Selective activation around the left occipito-temporal sulcus for words relative to pictures: individual variability or false positives?
We used high-resolution fMRI to investigate claims that learning to read results in greater left occipito-temporal (OT) activation for written words relative to pictures of objects. In the first experiment, 9/16 subjects performing a one-back task showed activation in > or =1 left OT voxel for words relative to pictures (P < 0.05 uncorrected). In a second experiment, another 9/15 subjects performing a semantic decision task activated > or =1 left OT voxel for words relative to pictures. However, at this low statistical threshold false positives need to be excluded. The semantic decision paradigm was therefore repeated, within subject, in two different scanners (1.5 and 3 T). Both scanners consistently localised left OT activation for words relative to fixation and pictures relative to words, but there were no consistent effects for words relative to pictures. Finally, in a third experiment, we minimised the voxel size (1.5 x 1.5 x 1.5 mm(3)) and demonstrated a striking concordance between the voxels activated for words and pictures, irrespective of task (naming vs. one-back) or script (English vs. Hebrew). In summary, although we detected differential activation for words relative to pictures, these effects: (i) do not withstand statistical rigour; (ii) do not replicate within or between subjects; and (iii) are observed in voxels that also respond to pictures of objects. Our findings have implications for the role of left OT activation during reading. More generally, they show that studies using low statistical thresholds in single subject analyses should correct the statistical threshold for the number of comparisons made or replicate effects within subject.
Wright
Nicholas D
ND
Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mechelli
Andrea
A
Noppeney
Uta
U
Veltman
Dick J
DJ
Rombouts
Serge A R B
SA
Glensman
Janice
J
Haynes
John-Dylan
JD
Price
Cathy J
CJ
D000328:Adult; D001931:Brain Mapping / Q000379:methods; D005189:False Positive Reactions; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009778:Occipital Lobe / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods*; D011932:Reading; D013702:Temporal Lobe / Q000502:physiology*
Neuroimage. 2007 Mar;35(1):334-42
17239621
Brain. 1999 Jan;122 ( Pt 1):61-73
10050895
Neuropsychologia. 1998 Nov;36(11):1115-32
9842758
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2005 Apr;15(2):231-8
15831408
Brain. 2000 Feb;123 ( Pt 2):291-307
10648437
Neurology. 1983 Dec;33(12):1573-83
6685830
Neuroimage. 1999 Aug;10(2):181-92
10417250
Nature. 1996 Sep 19;383(6597):254-6
8805700
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2005 May;22(3):262-75
21038249
Hum Brain Mapp. 2002 Jul;16(3):168-75
12112770
Nature. 2005 Nov 24;438(7067):496-9
16244649
Neuroimage. 2005 Nov 15;28(3):738-44
16109492
Neuron. 2002 Apr 25;34(3):479-90
11988177
Neuroimage. 2007 Apr 15;35(3):1287-302
17363278
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Jun;18(6):911-22
16839299
Neuron. 2006 Apr 20;50(2):191-204
16630832
Neuroimage. 2000 Oct;12(4):392-403
10988033
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Aug;24(3):702-14
15921900
Brain. 2002 May;125(Pt 5):1054-69
11960895
Neuroimage. 2006 Jan 15;29(2):643-8
16137894
Neuropsychologia. 1996 Mar;34(3):185-94
8868276
Neuroimage. 2005 Jan 15;24(2):548-59
15627597
Neuroimage. 2003 Jul;19(3):473-81
12880781
Neuroimage. 2006 Aug 15;32(2):806-20
16750396
Brain. 1987 Oct;110 ( Pt 5):1099-116
3676694
Cereb Cortex. 2006 Mar;16(3):437-45
15944370
Neuroimage. 2004 May;22(1):477-9
15110041
J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 May;12(3):495-504
10931774
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1989 Mar;118(1):13-42
2522504
Neuroimage. 2004 May;22(1):466-76
15110040
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Nov;17(11):1753-65
16269111