Innovation and robustness in complex regulatory gene networks.
The history of life involves countless evolutionary innovations, a steady stream of ingenuity that has been flowing for more than 3 billion years. Very little is known about the principles of biological organization that allow such innovation. Here, we examine these principles for evolutionary innovation in gene expression patterns. To this end, we study a model for the transcriptional regulation networks that are at the heart of embryonic development. A genotype corresponds to a regulatory network of a given topology, and a phenotype corresponds to a steady-state gene expression pattern. Networks with the same phenotype form a connected graph in genotype space, where two networks are immediate neighbors if they differ by one regulatory interaction. We show that an evolutionary search on this graph can reach genotypes that are as different from each other as if they were chosen at random in genotype space, allowing evolutionary access to different kinds of innovation while staying close to a viable phenotype. Thus, although robustness to mutations may hinder innovation in the short term, we conclude that long-term innovation in gene expression patterns can only emerge in the presence of the robustness caused by connected genotype graphs.
Ciliberti
S
S
Unité Mixte Recherche 8565, Laboratoire de Physique Théorique et Modèles Statistiques, Université Paris-Sud and Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, F-91405 Orsay, France.
Martin
O C
OC
Wagner
A
A
D000818:Animals; D053263:Gene Regulatory Networks; D005838:Genotype; D008957:Models, Genetic; D010641:Phenotype; D014158:Transcription, Genetic / Q000235:genetics
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 6;99(16):10528-32
12082173
J Theor Biol. 1991 Oct 21;152(4):429-53
1758194
Nature. 2003 Jul 31;424(6948):549-52
12891357
J Evol Biol. 2004 Sep;17(5):1106-10
15312082
Evolution. 1996 Jun;50(3):1008-1023
28565284
Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Sep;18(9):1764-70
11504856
Biosystems. 1998 Jun-Jul;47(1-2):79-90
9715752
Nature. 1999 Jan 14;397(6715):168-71
9923680
Bull Math Biol. 1997 Mar;59(2):339-97
9116604
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Nov 22;267(1459):2281-6
11413644
PLoS Comput Biol. 2007 Feb 2;3(2):e15
17274682
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jan 22;99(2):673-8
11792856
Nature. 2000 Jul 13;406(6792):188-92
10910359
J Exp Zool. 2000 Oct 15;288(3):242-83
11069142
Nature. 2004 Jul 15;430(6997):368-71
15254541
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Aug 17;96(17):9716-20
10449760
PLoS Biol. 2004 Jun;2(6):e123
15208707
J Mol Evol. 1996 Sep;43(3):165-9
8703081
Evolution. 1996 Jun;50(3):967-976
28565291
Biosystems. 1999 Apr;50(1):49-59
10235650
Bioessays. 2006 Nov;28(11):1102-11
17041900
Science. 2002 Mar 1;295(5560):1664-9
11872830
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Jul 22;100(15):8710-4
12853565
Proc Biol Sci. 1991 Jul 22;245(1312):7-11
1682931
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Mar 14;103(11):4180-5
16537505
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jul 21;95(15):8420-7
9671692
Nature. 2006 Mar 2;440(7080):87-90
16511495
Biopolymers. 1993 Sep;33(9):1389-404
7691201
Cell. 1989 Apr 21;57(2):197-9
2649248
Proc Biol Sci. 1994 Mar 22;255(1344):279-84
7517565
Biotechnol Prog. 2000 Nov-Dec;16(6):927-39
11101318
Curr Biol. 2002 May 14;12(10):778-86
12015114
Science. 1998 May 29;280(5368):1451-5
9603737