title: Patient safety culture in primary care: developing a theoretical framework for practical use.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Great importance has been attached to a culture of safe practice in healthcare organisations, but it has proved difficult to engage frontline staff with this complex concept. The present study aimed to develop and test a framework for making the concept of safety culture meaningful and accessible to managers and frontline staff, and facilitating discussion of ways to improve team/organisational safety culture.
  
  
  METHODS
  Eight primary care trusts and a sample of their associated general practices in north west England.
  
  
  METHODS
  In phase 1 a comprehensive review of the literature and a postal survey of experts helped identify the key dimensions of safety culture in primary care. Semistructured interviews with 30 clinicians and managers explored the application of these dimensions to an established theory of organisational maturity. In phase 2 the face validity and utility of the framework was assessed in 33 interviews and 14 focus groups.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Nine dimensions were identified through which safety culture is expressed in primary care organisations. Organisational descriptions were developed for how these dimensions might be characterised at five levels of organisational maturity. The resulting framework conceptualises patient safety culture as multidimensional and dynamic, and seems to have a high level of face validity and utility within primary care. It aids clinicians' and managers' understanding of the concept of safety culture and promotes discussion within teams about their safety culture maturity.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The framework moves the agenda on from rhetoric about the importance of safety culture to a way of understanding why and how the shared values of staff working within a healthcare organisation may be operationalised to create a safe environment for patient care.
authors: School of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Sue.Kirk@manchester.ac.uk
authors: Susan
authors: S
authors: Kirk
authors: Dianne
authors: D
authors: Parker
authors: Tanya
authors: T
authors: Claridge
authors: Aneez
authors: A
authors: Esmail
authors: Martin
authors: M
authors: Marshall
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D004739:England; D017144:Focus Groups; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D015279:Organizational Culture; D010348:Patient Care Team / Q000592:standards; D011216:Practice Management, Medical; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000592:standards*; D016730:Program Development; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D017751:Safety Management / Q000379:methods*; D013192:Staff Development; D017749:Total Quality Management / Q000379:methods*
references: BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):777-81
references: 10720366
references: BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):725-6
references: 10720335
references: Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Dec;14(6):417-21
references: 16326787
references: Qual Health Care. 2000 Jun;9(2):111-9
references: 11067249
references: Qual Health Care. 2001 Dec;10(4):257-62
references: 11743156
references: Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Jun;11(2):158-62
references: 12448809
references: Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Dec;13 Suppl 2:ii22-7
references: 15576687
references: Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Apr;12(2):112-8
references: 12679507
references: J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003 Apr;8(2):105-17
references: 12820673
references: Health Serv Res. 2003 Jun;38(3):923-45
references: 12822919
references: Jt Comm J Qual Saf. 2004 Mar;30(3):125-32
references: 15032069
references: J Appl Psychol. 1980 Feb;65(1):96-102
references: 7364709
references: Qual Health Res. 1998 May;8(3):341-51
references: 10558335
references: Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Sep;11(3):266-9
references: 12486993