title: Occipitoparietal contributions to recognition memory: stimulus encoding prompted by verbal instructions and operant contingencies.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Many human neuroimaging investigations on recognition memory employ verbal instructions to direct subject's attention to a stimulus attribute. But do the same or a similar neurophysiological process occur during nonverbal experiences, such as those involving contingency-shaped responses? Establishing the spatially distributed neural network underlying recognition memory for instructed stimuli and operant, contingency-shaped (i.e., discriminative) stimuli would extend the generality of contemporary domain-general views of recognition memory and clarify the involvement of declarative memory processes in human operant behavior.
  
  
  METHODS
  Fifteen healthy adults received equivalent amounts of exposure to three different stimulus sets prior to neuroimaging. Encoding of one stimulus set was prompted using instructions that emphasized memorizing stimuli (Instructed). In contrast, encoding of two additional stimulus sets was prompted using a GO/NO-GO operant task, in which contingencies shaped appropriate GO and NO-GO responding. During BOLD functional MRI, subjects completed two recognition tasks. One required passive viewing of stimuli. The second task required recognizing whether a presented stimulus was a GO/NO-GO stimulus, an Instructed stimulus, or novel (NEW) stimulus. Retrieval success related to recognition memory was isolated by contrasting activation from each stimulus set to a novel stimulus (i.e., an OLD > NEW contrast). To explore differences potentially related to source memory, separate contrasts were performed between stimulus sets.
  
  
  RESULTS
  No regions reached supralevel thresholds during the passive viewing task. However, a relatively similar set of regions was activated during active recognition regardless of the methods and included dorsolateral and ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, right inferior and posterior parietal regions and the occipitoparietal region, precuneus, lingual, fusiform gyri and cerebellum. Results also showed the magnitude of the functional response in the occipitoparietal region was inversely correlated with reaction times (RTs), such that the largest functional response and slowest RTs occurred to Instructed stimuli and the smallest functional response and fastest RTs occurred to GO stimuli, with effects to NO-GO stimuli intermediate. The inverse relation was also present bilaterally in the parahippocampus and hippocampus. Comparisons between stimulus sets also revealed regional differences potentially related to source memory.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Recognition of stimuli previously associated with instructions and operant contingencies (i.e., discriminative stimuli) generally recruited similar inferior frontal and occipitoparietal regions and right posterior parietal cortex, with the right occipitoparietal region showing the largest effect. These findings suggest domain-general views of recognition memory may be applicable to understanding the neural correlates of control exerted by discriminative stimuli and suggest declarative memory processes are involved in human operant behavior.
authors: Department of Behavioral Psychology, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore MD, USA. schlund@kennedykrieger.org.
authors: Michael W
authors: MW
authors: Schlund
authors: Michael F
authors: MF
authors: Cataldo
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Nov 26;93(24):13515-22
references: 8942965
references: Cereb Cortex. 2003 Mar;13(3):318-27
references: 12571121
references: J Neurosci. 2000 Jun 1;20(11):4233-9
references: 10818159
references: Hippocampus. 1998;8(4):313-22
references: 9744418
references: Cortex. 1979 Mar;15(1):83-96
references: 109247
references: Neuroimage. 2003 Jul;19(3):1233-9
references: 12880848
references: J Neurosci. 2004 Nov 10;24(45):10084-92
references: 15537877
references: Neuroimage. 2000 Nov;12(5):495-503
references: 11034857
references: Neuroimage. 2007 Jan 1;34(1):384-98
references: 17071109
references: Neuron. 2006 May 4;50(3):507-17
references: 16675403
references: J Neurosci. 2004 Apr 28;24(17):4172-80
references: 15115812
references: Neuroimage. 2004 Jan;21(1):302-10
references: 14741668
references: Behav Neural Biol. 1980 May;29(1):105-10
references: 7387579
references: Neuron. 2005 Feb 3;45(3):459-67
references: 15694331
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 2005 Nov;84(3):505-19
references: 16596977
references: Neuroimage. 2000 Sep;12(3):276-86
references: 10944410
references: Neuroimage. 2004 Apr;21(4):1337-49
references: 15050559
references: Cereb Cortex. 2005 Dec;15(12):1855-65
references: 15746002
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 1992 Summer;4(3):232-43
references: 23964880
references: Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Nov;162(11):2049-60
references: 16263844
references: Neuropsychologia. 1989;27(9):1119-27
references: 2812296
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 2007 Mar;87(2):287-307
references: 17465317
references: J Neurosci. 2000 Oct 15;20(20):7776-81
references: 11027241