title: Dominant-negative suppression of big brain ion channel activity by mutation of a conserved glutamate in the first transmembrane domain.
abstract: The neurogenic protein Drosophila big brain (BIB), which is involved in the process of neuroblast determination, and the water channel aquaporin-1 (AQP1) are among a subset of the major intrinsic protein (MIP) channels that have been found to show gated monovalent cation channel activity. A glutamate residue in the first transmembrane (M1) domain is conserved throughout the MIP family. Mutation of this residue to asparagine in BIB (E71N) knocks out ion channel activity, and when coexpressed with BIB wild-type as shown here generates a dominant-negative effect on ion channel function, measured in the Xenopus oocyte expression system using two-electrode voltage clamp. cRNAs for wild-type and mutant BIB or AQP1 channels were injected individually or as mixtures. The magnitude of the BIB ionic conductance response was greatly reduced by coexpression of the mutant E71N subunit, suggesting a dominant-negative mechanism of action. The analogous mutation in AQP1 (E17N) did not impair ion channel activation by cGMP, but did knock out water channel function, although not via a dominant-negative effect. This contrast in sensitivity between BIB and AQP1 to mutation of the M1 glutamate suggests the possibility of interesting structural differences in the molecular basis of the ion permeation between these two classes of channels. The dominant-negative construct of BIB could be a tool for testing a role for BIB ion channels during nervous system development in Drosophila. The neurogenic protein Drosophila big brain (BIB), which is involved in the process of neuroblast determination, and the water channel aquaporin-1 (AQP1) are among a subset of the major intrinsic protein (MIP) channels that have been found to show gated monovalent cation channel activity. A glutamate residue in the first transmembrane (M1) domain is conserved throughout the MIP family. Mutation of this residue to asparagine in BIB (E71N) knocks out ion channel activity, and when coexpressed with BIB wild-type as shown here generates a dominant-negative effect on ion channel function, measured in the Xenopus oocyte expression system using two-electrode voltage clamp. cRNAs for wild-type and mutant BIB or AQP1 channels were injected individually or as mixtures. The magnitude of the BIB ionic conductance response was greatly reduced by coexpression of the mutant E71N subunit, suggesting a dominant-negative mechanism of action. The analogous mutation in AQP1 (E17N) did not impair ion channel activation by cGMP, but did knock out water channel function, although not via a dominant-negative effect. This contrast in sensitivity between BIB and AQP1 to mutation of the M1 glutamate suggests the possibility of interesting structural differences in the molecular basis of the ion permeation between these two classes of channels. The dominant-negative construct of BIB could be a tool for testing a role for BIB ion channels during nervous system development in Drosophila.
authors: Department of Physiology, BIOS Institute, Arizona Research Labs Division of Neurobiology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85724, USA. ayool@u.arizona.edu
authors: Andrea J
authors: AJ
authors: Yool
mesh_terms: D000595:Amino Acid Sequence; D000818:Animals; D051398:Aquaporin 1 / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics; D004330:Drosophila / Q000235:genetics; D029721:Drosophila Proteins / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000235:genetics* / Q000378:metabolism; D005260:Female; D005799:Genes, Dominant; D018698:Glutamic Acid / Q000235:genetics*; D066298:In Vitro Techniques; D007473:Ion Channels / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism; D008565:Membrane Proteins / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000235:genetics* / Q000378:metabolism; D008954:Models, Biological; D008958:Models, Molecular; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D009154:Mutation; D009865:Oocytes / Q000378:metabolism; D017434:Protein Structure, Tertiary / Q000235:genetics; D017386:Sequence Homology, Amino Acid; D014982:Xenopus laevis
chemical_list: D029721:Drosophila Proteins; D007473:Ion Channels; D008565:Membrane Proteins; C070621:bib protein, Drosophila; D051398:Aquaporin 1; D018698:Glutamic Acid
references: J Neurosci. 2002 Apr 1;22(7):2530-40
references: 11923418
references: Biophys J. 1995 Jan;68(1):147-56
references: 7711236
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Mar 1;102(9):3477-82
references: 15728380
references: Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2003 May;284(5):F893-901
references: 12676734
references: Structure. 2006 Sep;14(9):1411-23
references: 16962972
references: Biochemistry. 1996 Jan 16;35(2):538-44
references: 8555225
references: J Biol Chem. 1994 May 20;269(20):14648-54
references: 7514176
references: Science. 1996 Aug 30;273(5279):1216-8
references: 8703053
references: Cell. 1992 May 29;69(5):715-8
references: 1375539
references: Wilehm Roux Arch Dev Biol. 1983 Mar;192(2):62-74
references: 28305500
references: Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2002 Dec;23(12):558-62
references: 12457773
references: Biophys J. 2004 Mar;86(3):1470-8
references: 14990474
references: Nature. 1999 Nov 11;402(6758):184-7
references: 10647010
references: Development. 1997 Oct;124(19):3881-93
references: 9367444
references: Hum Mol Genet. 2000 Sep 22;9(15):2329-34
references: 11001937
references: J Biol Chem. 1993 Jan 5;268(1):17-20
references: 7677994
references: Neuropharmacology. 1996;35(7):1007-16
references: 8938731
references: Physiol Rev. 1999 Oct;79(4):1317-72
references: 10508236
references: Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Oct;69(4):738-48
references: 11536078
references: Science. 2002 Apr 19;296(5567):525-30
references: 11964478
references: News Physiol Sci. 2002 Apr;17:68-72
references: 11909995
references: Am J Physiol. 1993 Oct;265(4 Pt 2):F463-76
references: 7694481
references: Curr Eye Res. 1995 Dec;14(12):1095-1100
references: 8974838
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Feb 8;102(6):2192-7
references: 15671159
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Dec 15;88(24):11110-4
references: 1722319
references: Nature. 1990 May 10;345(6271):163-7
references: 1692392
references: Science. 2000 Oct 20;290(5491):481-6
references: 11039922
references: Development. 1992 Sep;116(1):31-40
references: 1483394
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 19;103(38):14217-22
references: 16968783
references: Nature. 2001 Dec 20-27;414(6866):872-8
references: 11780053
references: Biochemistry. 1999 Jan 19;38(3):923-8
references: 9893987
references: J Neurosci. 2006 Jul 26;26(30):7811-9
references: 16870726
references: Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. 1993;28(3):235-57
references: 8325040
references: Mol Pharmacol. 2000 Mar;57(3):576-88
references: 10692499
references: Hepatology. 2004 Jan;39(1):109-16
references: 14752829
references: Science. 1992 Aug 28;257(5074):1225-30
references: 1519059