Implementation of a pharmaceutical care service: prescriptionists', pharmacists' and doctors' views.
OBJECTIVE
To identify prescriptionists', pharmacists' and doctors' perceptions and experiences of a pharmaceutical care service supported by patient medication records (PMRs).


METHODS
Qualitative study employing focus group interviews with 16 prescriptionists and five pharmacists, and semi structured telephone interviews with 11 doctors.


METHODS
Prescriptionists', pharmacists' and doctors' views, experiences and perceptions of a pharmaceutical care service on Swedish community pharmacies.


RESULTS
The provision of pharmaceutical care aided by PMRs had a positive influence on the prescriptionists' and pharmacists' daily work, and on their view of their professional role. They assumed greater professional responsibility, and described greater use of their pharmaceutical knowledge, greater confidence in practice and an increased awareness of their counselling role. They appreciated that the pharmaceutical care service provided an over-all picture of patients' drug use, allowed for follow-up on counselling and made the prescriptionists' and pharmacists' competence tangible for patients. Perceived problems with the pharmaceutical care service included being time-consuming, record keeping being difficult, difficulty in getting understanding/support from colleagues and managers, and difficulty involving doctors. The majority of the doctors reported that they had not taken an active interest in the project, and their opinions of the pharmaceutical care service varied.


CONCLUSIONS
When prescriptionists and pharmacists apply the pharmaceutical care concept and work with PMRs, the patients are more likely to meet confident professionals that are more aware of the individual behind the drug therapy. This will hopefully contribute to informed, motivated medicine users that feel secure in their interactions with their pharmacy and receive, not only drugs, but treatment support. For such a service to be effective, however, it is vital to ensure that the doctors are fully co-operative.
Montgomery
Anna T
AT
Department of Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. anna.montgomery@apoteket.se
Kälvemark-Sporrong
Sofia
S
Henning
Mari
M
Tully
Mary P
MP
Kettis-Lindblad
Asa
A
D000328:Adult; D003157:Community Pharmacy Services; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D011307:Drug Prescriptions; D005260:Female; D017144:Focus Groups; D006801:Humans; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D008297:Male; D008499:Medical Records; D008875:Middle Aged; D010595:Pharmacists; D010820:Physicians; D024382:Professional Role
J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 1998 Sep-Oct;38(5):598-602
9782693
Nurse Educ Today. 1992 Jun;12(3):174-81
1625667
Pharm World Sci. 2003 Apr;25(2):73-8
12774568
Ann Pharmacother. 2006 Jun;40(6):1162-9
16735653
Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(23 ):iii-157
11785749
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2004 May-Jun;44(3):358-65
15191246
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(3):CD000336
10908471
Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Feb;14 (1):26-33
15692000
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2006 Jun;2(2):212-31
17138509
J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2000 Jan-Feb;40(1):71-81; quiz 123-5
10665252
Am Pharm. 1994 Nov;NS34(11):22-3
7847242
Pharm World Sci. 2002 Dec;24(6):224-30
12512154
Pharm World Sci. 2004 Oct;26(5):256-62
15598065
J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2000 Sep-Oct;40(5):625-30
11029843
Fam Pract. 2001 Dec;18(6):605-9
11739346
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2002 Jan 1;59(1):50-7
11813467
J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 1997 Nov-Dec;NS37(6):647-61
9425794
Soc Sci Med. 1999 Jul;49(1):55-66
10414840
J Adv Nurs. 1998 Aug;28(2):345-52
9725732
Lancet. 2003 Oct 11;362(9391):1225-30
14568747
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2000 Mar-Apr;7(2):116-24
10730594