title: Conditional Dnmt1 deletion in dorsal forebrain disrupts development of somatosensory barrel cortex and thalamocortical long-term potentiation.
abstract: The transcriptional mechanisms governing the development and plasticity of somatopic sensory maps in the cerebral cortex have not been extensively studied. In particular, no studies have addressed the role of epigenetic mechanisms in the development of sensory maps. DNA methylation is one the main epigenetic mechanisms available to mammalian cells to regulate gene transcription. As demethylation results in embryonic lethality, it has been very difficult to study the role of DNA methylation in brain development. We have used cre-lox technology to generate forebrain-specific deletion of DNA methyltransferase 1 (Dnmt1), the enzyme required for the maintenance of DNA methylation. We find that demethylation of neurons in the cerebral cortex results in the failure of development of somatosensory barrel cortex. We also find that in spite of functional thalamocortical neurotransmission, thalamocortical long-term potentiation cannot be induced in slices from Dnmt1 conditional mutants. These studies emphasize the importance of DNA methylation for the development of sensory maps and suggest epigenetic mechanisms may play a role in the development of synaptic plasticity.
authors: Department of Neurology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA 90095.
authors: Peyman
authors: P
authors: Golshani
authors: Leah
authors: L
authors: Hutnick
authors: Felix
authors: F
authors: Schweizer
authors: Guoping
authors: G
authors: Fan
references: Neuron. 2006 Feb 2;49(3):341-8
references: 16446138
references: J Comp Neurol. 1979 Jan 15;183(2):305-21
references: 762261
references: J Neurosci Res. 2005 Mar 15;79(6):734-46
references: 15672446
references: Brain Res. 1980 Feb 3;183(1):205-10
references: 7357403
references: J Neurosci. 2006 May 17;26(20):5393-401
references: 16707791
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Oct 28;100(22):13069-74
references: 14557544
references: Differentiation. 1994 Apr;56(1-2):39-44
references: 8026645
references: Brain Res. 1984 Jul 23;306(1-2):374-9
references: 6205721
references: Brain Res. 1970 Jan 20;17(2):205-42
references: 4904874
references: J Comp Neurol. 2005 May 16;485(4):280-92
references: 15803506
references: Science. 2003 Oct 31;302(5646):890-3
references: 14593184
references: Nature. 2000 Aug 17;406(6797):726-31
references: 10963597
references: Neuron. 2006 Mar 2;49(5):683-95
references: 16504944
references: Neuroscience. 1991;41(2-3):365-79
references: 1870696
references: Neurosci Lett. 1976 Mar;2(1):1-6
references: 19604804
references: Nat Rev Genet. 2000 Oct;1(1):11-9
references: 11262868
references: J Biol Chem. 2006 Jun 9;281(23):15763-73
references: 16606618
references: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1994 Aug;4(4):535-44
references: 7812142
references: Nat Genet. 1998 Jul;19(3):289-91
references: 9662407
references: Nat Genet. 1999 Oct;23(2):185-8
references: 10508514
references: J Comp Neurol. 1980 Sep 15;193(2):335-50
references: 7440771
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 May 28;93(11):5584-9
references: 8643619
references: Nat Neurosci. 2003 Sep;6(9):939-47
references: 12897788
references: J Neurosci. 2006 Apr 19;26(16):4338-49
references: 16624954
references: J Neurophysiol. 1992 Jul;68(1):345-9
references: 1381421
references: Cell. 1992 Jun 12;69(6):915-26
references: 1606615
references: Science. 1973 Jan 26;179(4071):395-8
references: 4682966
references: J Neurosci. 2006 Jan 4;26(1):319-27
references: 16399702
references: Neuron. 1996 Feb;16(2):297-307
references: 8789945
references: Science. 2003 Oct 31;302(5646):885-9
references: 14593183
references: Nat Genet. 2003 Mar;33 Suppl:245-54
references: 12610534
references: Hum Mol Genet. 2000 Oct;9(16):2395-402
references: 11005794
references: Science. 1995 Mar 17;267(5204):1662-6
references: 7886458
references: Neuron. 1997 Jul;19(1):63-76
references: 9247264
references: Nature. 1995 May 25;375(6529):325-8
references: 7753197