Sources of information for new drugs among physicians in Thailand.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the sources and the types of information about new drugs that Thai doctors at a teaching hospital perceived as important before prescribing and to assess their views on their preferred sources of drug information.


METHODS
There were two phases of this study, the quantitative and the qualitative components. For the quantitative study, a descriptive survey using a self-reported questionnaire was mailed. The qualitative component consisted of face-to-face interviews using a semi-structured questionnaire.


METHODS
The initial sources of information about new drugs; the reliability scores for each source of information; the types of information that doctors required before prescribing new drugs; and the prescribers' views on their preferred sources.


RESULTS
The general findings regarding the doctors' information sources on new drugs were consistent in both the quantitative and qualitative analyses. Conferences, medical journals, and meetings with medical representatives were the initial sources of information for new drugs. Safety and efficacy profiles of new drugs were the most common types of information considered before prescribing new medicines. Although the medical representatives were viewed as very efficient in providing information about new drugs, the interviewees perceived that the information obtained from the persons employed by the pharmaceutical companies was likely to be biased. Consequently, the physicians preferred to have an unbiased resource person who could proactively provide two-sided information for both existing and new drugs at the hospital.


CONCLUSIONS
The information sources on new drugs most frequently used by the physicians include scientific conferences, journals and medical representatives and they yearn for unbiased information regarding safety and efficacy of the promoted drugs before prescribing the new medicines. Thus, there is a window of opportunity for hospital pharmacists to serve the unmet needs of the physicians.
Layton
Maneerat R
MR
Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, 40002, Thailand. lmanee@kku.ac.th
Sritanyarat
Wanapa
W
Chadbunchachai
Supatra
S
Wertheimer
Albert I
AI
D004346:Drug Information Services / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D004363:Drug Utilization; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010506:Periodicals as Topic; D010595:Pharmacists; D010607:Pharmacy Service, Hospital; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013785:Thailand
N Engl J Med. 2000 Jun 22;342(25):1902-4
10861327
Med J Aust. 2002 Sep 16;177(6):291-3
12225274
JAMA. 1990 Jan 26;263(4):549-56
2104640
BMJ. 1996 Sep 21;313(7059):732-3; discussion 733-4
8819446
Lancet. 1989 Nov 25;2(8674):1261-3
2573769
West J Med. 2001 Apr;174(4):232-3
11290664
BMJ. 2001 Aug 18;323(7309):378-81
11509431
JAMA. 1995 Apr 26;273(16):1296-8
7715044
Ann Intern Med. 1980 May;92(5):690-2
7387011
Ann Intern Med. 1992 Jun 1;116(11):912-9
1580449
JAMA. 1984 Jan 6;251(1):61-4
6690767
JAMA. 2001 Apr 18;285(15):2009-12
11308441
Am J Hosp Pharm. 1978 Aug;35(8):909-14
677136
Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1997 Jul;85(3):223-32
9285121
Can Fam Physician. 1997 May;43:941-5
9154366
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001 Feb;51(2):184-9
11259994
J Health Care Mark. 1991 Sep;11(3):46-60
10120930
Pharm World Sci. 2003 Dec;25(6):269-75
14689815
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2001 Aug;32(2):109-14
11477727
Soc Sci Med. 1990;31(4):467-76
2218627
N Engl J Med. 2005 Mar 17;352(11):1133-5
15713946
J Am Pharm Assoc (Wash). 2002 Jul-Aug;42(4):638-45
12150362
Teach Learn Med. 2003 Winter;15(1):14-20
12632703