Effect of biotic and abiotic factors on in vitro proliferation, encystment, and excystment of Pfiesteria piscicida.
Pfiesteria spp. are mixotrophic armored dinoflagellates populating the Atlantic coastal waters of the United States. They have been a focus of intense research due to their reported association with several fish mortality events. We have now used a clonal culture of Pfiesteria piscicida and several new environmental isolates to describe growth characteristics, feeding, and factors contributing to the encystment and germination of the organism in both laboratory and environmental samples. We also discuss applied methods of detection of the different morphological forms of Pfiesteria in environmental samples. In summary, Pfiesteria, when grown with its algal prey, Rhodomonas sp., presents a typical growth curve with lag, exponential, and stationary phases, followed by encystment. The doubling time in exponential phase is about 12 h. The profiles of proliferation under a standard light cycle and in the dark were similar, although the peak cell densities were markedly lower when cells were grown in the dark. The addition of urea, chicken manure, and soil extracts did not enhance Pfiesteria proliferation, but crude unfiltered spent aquarium water did. Under conditions of food deprivation or cold (4 degrees C), Pfiesteria readily formed harvestable cysts that were further analyzed by PCR and scanning electron microscopy. The germination of Pfiesteria cysts in environmental sediment was enhanced by the presence of live fish: dinospores could be detected 13 to 15 days earlier and reached 5- to 10-times-higher peak cell densities with live fish than with artificial seawater or f/2 medium alone. The addition of ammonia, urea, nitrate, phosphate, or surprisingly, spent fish aquarium water had no effect.
Saito
Keiko
K
Center of Marine Biotechnology, University of Maryland Biotechnology Institute, 701 East Pratt St., Baltimore, MD 21202, USA. vasta@umbi.umd.edu
Drgon
Tomás
T
Krupatkina
Danara N
DN
Drgonova
Jana
J
Terlizzi
Daniel E
DE
Mercer
Natalia
N
Vasta
Gerardo R
GR
D000818:Animals; D017756:Aquaculture; D016054:DNA, Protozoan / Q000032:analysis; D004275:DNA, Ribosomal / Q000235:genetics; D003624:Darkness; D056890:Eukaryota / Q000254:growth & development; D018628:Gene Dosage; D019015:Geologic Sediments / Q000469:parasitology*; D007695:Killifishes / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000502:physiology; D008027:Light; D008855:Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; D020045:Pfiesteria piscicida / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000302:isolation & purification / Q000502:physiology; D016133:Polymerase Chain Reaction; D013045:Species Specificity; D033761:Spores, Protozoan / Q000254:growth & development
D016054:DNA, Protozoan; D004275:DNA, Ribosomal
Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Dec;65(12):5594-6
10584023
J Eukaryot Microbiol. 2005 Mar-Apr;52(2):90-4
15817113
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Nov;66(11):4641-8
11055905
J Toxicol Environ Health A. 2001 Aug 24;63(8):553-64
11549115
Environ Health Perspect. 2001 Oct;109 Suppl 5:667-79
11677174
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Feb;68(2):989-94
11823251
Nature. 2002 Aug 29;418(6901):967-70
12198545
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Nov;68(11):5394-407
12406730
Environ Lett. 1975;9(2):129-39
1239372
Histochemistry. 1983;79(2):219-26
6643138
Nature. 1987 Feb 12-18;325(6105):616-7
3808064
Md Med J. 1998 May;47(3):106-12
9601194
Md Med J. 1998 May;47(3):120-3
9601196
Md Med J. 1998 May;47(3):144-7
9601202
Lancet. 1998 Aug 15;352(9127):532-9
9716058
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Jan;71(1):519-29
15640229
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Apr 11;97(8):4303-8
10760297