title: Pleasantness bias in flashbulb memories: positive and negative flashbulb memories of the fall of the Berlin Wall among East and West Germans.
abstract: Flashbulb memories for the fall of the Berlin Wall were examined among 103 East and West Germans who considered the event as either highly positive or highly negative. The participants in the positive group rated their memories higher on measures of reliving and sensory imagery, whereas their memory for facts was less accurate than that of the participants in the negative group. The participants in the negative group had higher ratings on amount of consequences but had talked less about the event and considered it less central to their personal and national identity than did the participants in the positive group. In both groups, rehearsal and the centrality of the memory to the person's identity and life story correlated positively with memory qualities. The results suggest that positive and negative emotions have different effects on the processing and long-term retention of flashbulb memories.
authors: Department of Psychology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. anetboh@psy.au.dk
authors: Annette
authors: A
authors: Bohn
authors: Dornhe
authors: D
authors: Berntsen
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000339:Affect; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D005260:Female; D005858:Germany; D006801:Humans; D008016:Life Change Events; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory; D008875:Middle Aged; D011057:Politics
references: Psychol Sci. 2003 Sep;14(5):455-61
references: 12930476
references: Mem Cognit. 1994 May;22(3):326-43
references: 8007835
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1995 Nov;21(6):1608-23
references: 7490581
references: Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2001 May;75(3):262-73
references: 11300733
references: Conscious Cogn. 1999 Mar;8(1):114-22
references: 10072696
references: Cognition. 1988 Jul;29(2):179-96
references: 3168421
references: Mem Cognit. 2004 Oct;32(7):1118-32
references: 15813494
references: Cogn Psychol. 2000 Feb;40(1):1-38
references: 10692232
references: Behav Neurosci. 1990 Aug;104(4):532-43
references: 2206424
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Oct;71(4):665-79
references: 8888596
references: Behav Res Ther. 2006 Feb;44(2):219-31
references: 16389062
references: Mem Cognit. 2001 Sep;29(6):779-88
references: 11716051
references: Mem Cognit. 2002 Oct;30(7):1010-20
references: 12507366
references: Nat Neurosci. 1999 Mar;2(3):289-93
references: 10195224
references: J Trauma Stress. 1995 Oct;8(4):607-27
references: 8564275
references: Conscious Cogn. 2004 Dec;13(4):844-58
references: 15522635
references: Psychol Rev. 1999 Jul;106(3):529-50
references: 10467897
references: Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Apr;23(2):177-91; discussion 192-233
references: 11301577
references: Psychol Bull. 1997 May;121(3):331-54
references: 9136640
references: Trends Neurosci. 1998 Jul;21(7):294-9
references: 9683321
references: Psychol Rep. 1996 Oct;79(2):467-73
references: 8909069
references: Mem Cognit. 1998 May;26(3):516-31
references: 9610122
references: J Pers Soc Psychol. 1970 Jul;15(3):234-9
references: 5485415
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 Mar;18(2):379-90
references: 1532823
references: Mem Cognit. 1989 Jul;17(4):435-43
references: 2761401
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Mar 2;101(9):3310-5
references: 14981255
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2005 May;134(2):242-57
references: 15869348
references: J Neurosci. 2000 Oct 1;20(19):RC99
references: 11000199
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2004;27:1-28
references: 15217324
references: Memory. 2005 Feb;13(2):148-60
references: 15847227
references: J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1996 May;2(3):249-55
references: 9375191
references: Psychol Rep. 2001 Apr;88(2):323-31
references: 11351866
references: Cognition. 1984 Feb;16(1):81-95
references: 6540650
references: J Trauma Stress. 2003 Jun;16(3):229-36
references: 12816334
references: Psychol Sci. 2005 Oct;16(10):785-91
references: 16181441