title: Sustained increase of somatosensory cortex excitability by tactile coactivation studied by paired median nerve stimulation in humans correlates with perceptual gain.
abstract: Cortical excitability can be reliably assessed by means of paired-pulse stimulation techniques. Recent studies demonstrated particularly for motor and visual cortex that cortical excitability is systematically altered following the induction of learning processes or during the development of pathological symptoms. A recent tactile coactivation protocol developed by Godde and coworkers showed that improvement of tactile performance in humans can be achieved also without training through passive stimulation on a time scale of a few hours. Tactile coactivation evokes plastic changes in somatosensory cortical areas as measured by blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) activation in fMRI or SEP-dipole localization, which correlated with the individual gain in performance. To demonstrate changes in excitability of somatosensory cortex after tactile coactivation, we combined assessment of tactile performance with recordings of paired-pulse SEPs after electrical median nerve stimulation of both the right coactivated and left control hand at ISIs of 30 and 100 ms before, 3 h after and 24 h after tactile coactivation. Amplitudes and latencies of the first and second cortical N20/P25 response components were calculated. For the coactivated hand, we found significantly lowered discrimination thresholds and significantly reduced paired-pulse ratios (second N20/P25 response/first N20/P25 response) at an ISI of 30 ms after tactile coactivation indicating enhanced cortical excitability. No changes in paired-pulse behaviour were observed for ISIs of 100 ms. Both psychophysical and cortical effects recovered to baseline 24 h after tactile coactivation. The individual increase of excitability correlated with the individual gain in discrimination performance. For the left control hand we found no effects of tactile coactivation on paired-pulse behaviour and discrimination threshold. Our results indicate that changes in cortical excitability are modified by tactile coactivation and were scaled with the degree of improvement of the individual perceptual learning. Conceivably, changes of cortical excitability seem to constitute an additional important marker and mechanism underlying plastic reorganization.
authors: Department of Neurology, BG-Kliniken Bergmannsheil, Buerkle-de-la-Camp-Platz 1, 44789 Bochum, Germany.
authors: Oliver
authors: O
authors: Höffken
authors: Mathias
authors: M
authors: Veit
authors: Frauke
authors: F
authors: Knossalla
authors: Silke
authors: S
authors: Lissek
authors: Barbara
authors: B
authors: Bliem
authors: Patrick
authors: P
authors: Ragert
authors: Hubert R
authors: HR
authors: Dinse
authors: Martin
authors: M
authors: Tegenthoff
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001931:Brain Mapping / Q000379:methods; D004558:Electric Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D005073:Evoked Potentials, Somatosensory; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008475:Median Nerve / Q000502:physiology*; D009473:Neuronal Plasticity; D010465:Perception; D011930:Reaction Time; D012684:Sensory Thresholds; D013003:Somatosensory Cortex / Q000502:physiology*; D013997:Time Factors; D014110:Touch
references: J Neurosci. 2000 Feb 15;20(4):1597-604
references: 10662849
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Feb 6;93(3):1335-9
references: 8577765
references: Neuroreport. 2000 Apr 27;11(6):1295-9
references: 10817610
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:393-415
references: 10845069
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:139-66
references: 11283308
references: Exp Brain Res. 2001 Feb;136(4):431-8
references: 11291723
references: Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 May;112(5):793-9
references: 11336894
references: Brain. 2001 Jun;124(Pt 6):1171-81
references: 11353733
references: Clin Neurophysiol. 2001 Jul;112(7):1334-42
references: 11516746
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Oct 9;98(21):12255-60
references: 11593042
references: Neuron. 2001 Dec 20;32(6):1149-64
references: 11754844
references: Annu Rev Physiol. 2002;64:355-405
references: 11826273
references: Nature. 2002 Feb 7;415(6872):640-4
references: 11807497
references: Neuroreport. 2003 Mar 24;14(4):543-6
references: 12657881
references: J Neurophysiol. 2003 May;89(5):2339-45
references: 12612033
references: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Apr 29;358(1432):735-44
references: 12740120
references: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996 Jan;100(1):62-7
references: 8964265
references: J Neurophysiol. 1996 May;75(5):1765-78
references: 8734579
references: J Physiol. 1996 Nov 1;496 ( Pt 3):873-81
references: 8930851
references: Adv Neurol. 1997;73:159-78
references: 8959213
references: Neuroreport. 1996 Dec 20;8(1):281-5
references: 9051796
references: Neuron. 1997 Jun;18(6):995-1008
references: 9208866
references: J Neurosci. 1998 Feb 1;18(3):1115-23
references: 9437031
references: Exp Brain Res. 1998 Feb;118(3):421-6
references: 9497149
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1998;21:149-86
references: 9530495
references: J Physiol. 1998 Jun 1;509 ( Pt 2):607-18
references: 9575308
references: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1964 May 8;112:510-25
references: 14188112
references: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1964 Aug;17:126-35
references: 14204922
references: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1962 Jun;14:331-43
references: 13860632
references: Neurosci Lett. 2005 Jul 15;382(3):312-6
references: 15925110
references: PLoS Biol. 2005 Nov;3(11):e362
references: 16218766
references: Headache. 2005 Nov-Dec;45(10):1394-9
references: 16324172
references: Ann Neurol. 2006 Jul;60(1):88-94
references: 16685697
references: Trends Neurosci. 2007 Apr;30(4):167-75
references: 17292975
references: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007 Apr;17(2):148-53
references: 17317151
references: Exp Brain Res. 2007 Jul;181(1):131-7
references: 17345071
references: BMC Neurosci. 2007;8:58
references: 17663778
references: J Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Jul;15(4):305-24
references: 9736465
references: Neuron. 1999 May;23(1):159-70
references: 10402202
references: Science. 2003 Jul 4;301(5629):91-4
references: 12843392
references: Neurosci Lett. 2003 Sep 11;348(2):105-8
references: 12902029
references: Neuroreport. 2003 Sep 15;14(13):1747-51
references: 14512850
references: Clin Neurophysiol. 2003 Dec;114(12):2251-7
references: 14652084
references: Neuron. 2003 Oct 30;40(3):643-53
references: 14642286
references: J Neurosci. 2004 Jan 14;24(2):442-6
references: 14724242
references: Neurosci Lett. 2004 Feb 12;356(2):91-4
references: 14746871
references: J Neurophysiol. 2004 Apr;91(4):1570-8
references: 14627660
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1989;12:13-31
references: 2648947
references: J Neurophysiol. 1992 May;67(5):1031-56
references: 1597696
references: J Neurol Sci. 1992 Mar;108(1):24-31
references: 1624948
references: J Physiol. 1993 Nov;471:501-19
references: 8120818
references: J Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 Jan;11(1):111-3
references: 8195414
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:129-58
references: 7605058
references: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995 Sep;96(5):475-8
references: 7555921
references: Clin Neurophysiol. 2000 Apr;111(4):671-6
references: 10727918