Postural prioritization defines the interaction between a reaction time task and postural perturbations.
Concurrent demands for postural and cognitive control processes are now known to induce interference, e.g., information processing speed may decrease during postural adjustment. It is less clear whether postural control may, at least in many situations, take precedence over cognitive control ("postural prioritization"). The purpose of this study was to determine if postural dual-task effects are the result of a postural prioritization effect. Twelve young subjects (6 female; 24.1 +/- 4.1) performed a discrete choice reaction time (RT) task in combination with a platform perturbation. To assess the effect of postural prioritization on RT and center of pressure (COP) parameters, destabilizing perturbations were randomly interspersed with non-destabilizing perturbations. Furthermore, stimulus order and the time interval of the RT stimulus relative to the platform perturbation were manipulated. COP and RT data obtained in these manipulations were compared to single-task baseline data. The results suggested that, irrespective of the degree of threat to postural stability, postural task processes are prioritized. Furthermore, anticipation of a postural stimulus negatively affects RT. However, once a perturbation commences subsequent RTs are speeded. Postural reactions were unaffected by a concurrent RT task, however. The RT stimulus acted as a cue to initiate biomechanical adaptations for an upcoming perturbation.
Müller
Martijn L T M
ML
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA. mtmuller@umich.edu
Redfern
Mark S
MS
Jennings
J Richard
JR
D000328:Adult; D001307:Auditory Perception; D003071:Cognition; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009068:Movement; D011187:Posture / Q000502:physiology*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D014724:Vestibular Function Tests; D014722:Vestibule, Labyrinth / Q000502:physiology; D014732:Vibration; D014796:Visual Perception
Exp Brain Res. 1996 Mar;108(2):315-20
8815039
Neuroreport. 1999 Sep 29;10(14):2895-9
10549793
Psychol Bull. 1967 Mar;67(3):202-13
5341896
Psychol Bull. 2005 May;131(3):434-59
15869340
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Jun;10(3):358-77
6242412
Gait Posture. 2002 Aug;16(1):1-14
12127181
Neuroreport. 2001 Nov 16;12(16):3583-7
11733716
Gait Posture. 2002 Feb;15(1):83-93
11809584
Neurosci Lett. 1994 Jul 4;175(1-2):13-6
7970194
Exp Aging Res. 1993 Jan-Mar;19(1):1-13
8444263
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002 Dec;57(12):M785-92
12456737
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Oct;80(4):1939-50
9772251
Exp Brain Res. 2002 Oct;146(3):315-21
12232688
Psychol Bull. 1994 Sep;116(2):220-44
7972591
Psychol Sci. 2001 May;12(3):230-7
11437306
Gait Posture. 2003 Oct;18(2):11-9
14654203
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002 Aug;57(8):B298-303
12145355
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1997 Jul;52(4):M232-40
9224435
J Mot Behav. 2004 Jun;36(2):137-46
15130865
Exp Psychol. 2004;51(1):52-8
14959506
J Biomech. 2004 Oct;37(10):1573-81
15336932
Exp Brain Res. 2005 Dec;167(3):433-45
16041500
J Neurophysiol. 1989 Oct;62(4):841-53
2809706