title: Prospective evaluation of the risk of pre-eclampsia using logistic regression analysis.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To calculate the risk of developing pre-eclampsia (PET) in a consecutive series of low-risk women at 18-24 weeks' gestation, using recently published logistic regression models.
  
  
  METHODS
  This was a prospective study, with complete follow-up, in a consecutive series of unselected low-risk singleton pregnancies. Uterine artery pulsatility index as well as a combination of maternal factors were recorded at 18-24 weeks' gestation. The distribution of the estimated risks for the 16 PET patients was compared with that obtained for 136 women who had a normal pregnancy, as assessed by routine testing. A receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) curve was plotted to evaluate the detection rate at fixed false-positive rates (FPRs) of 5%, 10% and 20% and the corresponding odds cut-offs.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Just 1/16 (6.2%) women with PET developed the disease before the 34(th) week of gestation. Using the 'All PET' logistic regression model, for 16 PET cases the overall median odds was 1 : 1454, higher compared with that of 1 : 41635 estimated for controls. Using the 'PET >or= 34 weeks' model, the median odds of the 15 women who developed PET late was 1 : 3405, compared with 1 : 40785 for controls. In the case of PET before 34 weeks, the risk was 1 : 426373 vs. 1 : 4159823126 estimated for controls ('PET < 34 weeks' model). Detection rates for the All PET model were 18%, 50% and 62% at a FPR of 5%, 10% and 20%, respectively. For the PET >or= 34 weeks model these detection rates were 6%, 46% and 60%, respectively.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Even though the individual odds estimation is too low to represent the real risk of PET, the recently published logistic regression models detected more than 60% of PET at a FPR of 20% for both All PET and PET >or= 34 weeks models. Using these models in clinical practice does not seem to give any significant improvement over Doppler alone in the prediction of PET, but the use of a PET-specific odds instead of an actual Doppler value alone seems to be useful for clinical management.
authors: Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. giulianasimo@yahoo.it
authors: G
authors: G
authors: Simonazzi
authors: C
authors: C
authors: Vicenzi
authors: M A
authors: MA
authors: Rizzo
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Farina
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Gabrielli
authors: D
authors: D
authors: Arcelli
authors: G
authors: G
authors: Pilu
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Sekizawa
authors: N
authors: N
authors: Rizzo
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000886:Anthropometry; D001158:Arteries / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology; D004812:Epidemiologic Methods; D005189:False Positive Reactions; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D011225:Pre-Eclampsia / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000503:physiopathology; D011247:Pregnancy; D011673:Pulsatile Flow; D016216:Ultrasonography, Prenatal / Q000379:methods; D014599:Uterus / Q000098:blood supply