Contrasting responses of bumble bees to feeding conspecifics on their familiar and unfamiliar flowers.
Animals exploiting their familiar food items often avoid spatio-temporal aggregation with others by avoiding scents, less rewarding areas or visual contacts, thereby minimizing competition or interference when resources are replenished slowly in patches. When animals are searching or assessing available food sources, however, they may benefit from reducing sampling costs by following others at food sites. Therefore, animals may adjust their responses to others depending on their familiarity with foraging situations. Here, we conducted field experiments to test whether nectar-collecting bumble bees make this adjustment. We allowed free-foraging bees to choose between two inflorescences, one occupied by a conspecific bee and another unoccupied. When bees were presented with flowers of a familiar type, they avoided occupied inflorescences. In contrast, bees visited an occupied inflorescence when the flower type was unfamiliar. To our knowledge, this is the first report suggesting that animals adjust their responses to feeding conspecifics depending on their familiarity with food sources. Such behavioural flexibilities should allow foragers to both explore and exploit their environments efficiently.
Kawaguchi
Lina G
LG
Integrative Environmental Sciences, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tennodai 1-1-1, Tsukuba City, Ibaraki 305-8572, Japan. kawa@pe.ies.life.tsukuba.ac.jp
Ohashi
Kazuharu
K
Toquenaga
Yukihiko
Y
D000818:Animals; D001516:Bees / Q000502:physiology*; D005247:Feeding Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D035264:Flowers
Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Mar;14(3):102-106
10322509
Anim Behav. 2001 Jan;61(1):217-229
11170711
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002 Nov 29;357(1427):1549-57
12495512
Science. 2004 Jul 23;305(5683):487-91
15273386
Curr Biol. 2005 Jun 21;15(12):R447-8
15964260
Curr Biol. 2005 Nov 8;15(21):R869-71
16271856
Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Apr;20(4):187-93
16701367
Biol Lett. 2005 Dec 22;1(4):504-7
17148244
Oecologia. 1997 Apr;110(3):432-439
28307233
Oecologia. 1978 Jan;33(1):71-86
28309267
Oecologia. 1982 Sep;54(3):326-336
28309956
Oecologia. 1986 Jul;69(4):567-570
28311617
Oecologia. 1987 Jan;71(2):295-300
28312259
Oecologia. 1992 Jan;89(1):113-117
28313402
Anim Behav. 1998 Jan;55(1):199-206
9480686