Differences in Fourth-Graders' Participation Rates Across Four School-Based Nutrition Studies.
Federal policy has encouraged researchers to include children in research studies; thus, it is important to report experiences recruiting children to participate in studies. This article compares fourth-graders' participation rates across four school-based nutrition studies conducted in one school district in a southeastern state. For each study, children were observed eating school meals (breakfast and lunch); interviewed regarding dietary intake; and weighed and measured. For Study 1, children from 11 schools received $10 per interview for up to two interviews conducted in the morning at school. For Study 2, children from 10 schools received $25 if interviewed once in the evening, either by telephone or in a van parked outside the child's home. For Study 3, children from three schools received $10 per interview for up to three interviews held in the evening by telephone. For Study 4, children from six schools received $15 per interview for up to two interviews conducted either in the morning or afternoon at school, or in the evening by telephone. Recruitment procedures were similar for all studies.Participation rates were 73% (n=635) for Study 1, 57% (n=432) for Study 2, 66% (n=158) for Study 3, and 71% (n=296) for Study 4. Logistic regression was used to determine whether study (1, 2, 3, 4), race (black, white), or gender (male, female) were significant predictors of participation (agreed, denied). The results indicated that study (p<0.0001), race (p=0.0198), and gender (p=0.0188) were significant predictors, however, no two-factor interactions among these effects were significant. Post hoc pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni adjustment indicated that agreement to participate for Study 2 was lower (p<0.0001) than that for Studies 1, 3, and 4, which did not differ. Agreement to participate across all four studies was higher for black (69%) than white (63%; p=0.0054) children and for females (69%) than males (64%; p=0.0209). Schools provide a natural environment for nutrition research because school foodservice programs feed millions of children one or two meals (breakfast and/or lunch) each school day. Observations of children eating school meals provide a convenient and relatively unobtrusive means of validating children's dietary recalls. Thus, at some point, most child nutrition professionals are likely to be involved in research either directly (i.e. by conducting studies themselves) or indirectly (i.e. by allowing others access to their school cafeterias to collect data).This paper references the following data:Table 1. Similarities and Differences in the Designs for Each of the Four Studies.Table 2. Number and Percent of Fourth-Grade Children Who Agreed or Denied to Participate by Race and Gender Across all Four Studies Combined.Table 3. Number and Percent of Fourth-Grade Children Who Agreed or Denied to Participate by Gender and Race for Each of the Four Studies Separately.
Frye
Francesca H A
FH
Baxter
Suzanne Domel
SD
Litaker
Mark S
MS
Thompson
William O
WO
Guinn
Caroline H
CH
Baglio
Michelle L
ML
Shaffer
Nicole M
NM
Addict Behav. 1983;8(4):433-7
6610283
J Pediatr Nurs. 2000 Apr;15(2):99-104
10808625
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Sep;153(9):975-83
10482216
J Adolesc Health. 1997 Dec;21(6):376-83
9401856
Pediatr Ann. 1989 Apr;18(4):262-5
2755734
J Sch Health. 1993 Sep;63(7):316-7
8246465
J Am Diet Assoc. 1977 Jul;71(1):31-5
864160
J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Mar;102(3):386-95
11905461
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1991;623:299-313
2042838
Prev Med. 1989 Mar;18(2):267-79
2740296
Eval Rev. 1989 Feb;13(1):45-55
11659371
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2004 Mar-Apr;36(2):84-9
15068757
J Pediatr Nurs. 2001 Feb;16(1):43-52
11247524
J Am Diet Assoc. 2002 Mar;102(3):380-5
11902371
J Am Diet Assoc. 2000 Aug;100(8):911-8
10955049
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993 Oct 29;699:154-66
8267306
MMWR Recomm Rep. 1996 Jun 14;45(RR-9):1-41
8637498
J Am Diet Assoc. 1997 Nov;97(11):1293-8
9366868
Prev Med. 2003 May;36(5):601-14
12689806
Ann Epidemiol. 2004 Jul;14(6):385-90
15246326
Am J Epidemiol. 1984 Sep;120(3):436-48
6332531
J Nutr Educ Behav. 2003 May-Jun;35(3):124-34
12773283
J Sch Health. 2002 Mar;72(3):115-20
11962227
J Am Diet Assoc. 1994 Nov;94(11):1267-72
7963170
Orthop Nurs. 1999 Mar-Apr;18(2):84-7
10410052
J Pediatr Nurs. 2001 Apr;16(2):88-96
11326396
Health Psychol. 1988;7 Suppl:233-45
3243221
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Jul;153(7):695-704
10401802
J Sch Health. 1997 Dec;67(10):415-21
9503347
Health Educ Q. 1989 Summer;16(2):215-27
2732064
J Sch Health. 1991 May;61(5):198-200
1943041
J Am Diet Assoc. 1951 Sep;27(9):749-51
14880399
J Am Diet Assoc. 1993 Dec;93(12):1431-6
8245378
Prev Med. 1996 Jan-Feb;25(1):56-60
8778767
Eval Rev. 1996 Dec;20(6):737-53
10183266
J Sch Nurs. 1994 Dec;10(4):8, 10-4
7873912
J Am Diet Assoc. 1973 Apr;62(4):409-15
4691953
J Am Diet Assoc. 1993 Nov;93(11):1280-4
8227878
J Am Diet Assoc. 1994 Jun;94(6):626-30
8195550
J Sch Health. 1985 Dec;55(10):399-402
3853032
J Pediatr Nurs. 2000 Feb;15(1):14-21
10714034
Am J Public Health. 1998 Apr;88(4):603-9
9551002
J Am Diet Assoc. 1998 May;98(5):570-2
9597031
JAMA. 1996 Mar 13;275(10):768-76
8598593