Relating diarrheal disease to social networks and the geographic configuration of communities in rural Ecuador.
Social networks and geographic structures of communities are important predictors of infectious disease transmission. To examine their joint effects on diarrheal disease and how these effects might develop, the authors analyzed social network and geographic data from northern coastal Ecuador and examined associations with diarrhea prevalence. Between July 2003 and May 2005, 113 cases of diarrhea were identified in nine communities. Concurrently, sociometric surveys were conducted, and households were mapped with geographic information systems. Spatial distribution metrics of households within communities and of communities with respect to roads were developed that predict social network degree in casual contact ("contact") and food-sharing ("food") networks. The mean degree is 25-40% lower in communities with versus without road access and 66-94% lower in communities with lowest versus highest housing density. Associations with diarrheal disease were found for housing density (comparing dense with dispersed communities: risk ratio = 3.3, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.1, 10.0) and social connectedness (comparing lowest with highest degree communities: risk ratio = 3.4, 95% CI: 1.1, 10.1 in the contact network and risk ratio = 4.9, 95% CI: 1.1, 21.9 in the food network). Some of these differences may be related to more new residents, lower housing density, and less social connectedness in road communities.
Bates
Sarah J
SJ
School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Trostle
James
J
Cevallos
William T
WT
Hubbard
Alan
A
Eisenberg
Joseph N S
JN
D000328:Adult; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D016001:Confidence Intervals; D003967:Diarrhea / Q000453:epidemiology*; D004484:Ecuador / Q000453:epidemiology; D004777:Environment; D005260:Female; D040362:Geographic Information Systems; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D016017:Odds Ratio; D015995:Prevalence; D012424:Rural Population / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012944:Social Support; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D014186:Transportation
Int J Epidemiol. 1989 Mar;18(1):242-7
2722372
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Apr;44(7):949-68
9089917
Soc Sci Med. 1985;21(11):1203-16
3006260
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006 Dec 1;43(4):440-5
16980909
Science. 2006 Jan 6;311(5757):88-90
16400149
Lancet. 1985 Jul 6;2(8445):28-31
2861464
Cad Saude Publica. 1998 Apr;14(2):265-77
9658212
Sex Transm Dis. 2005 Aug;32(8):506-12
16041254
Nature. 2000 Feb 24;403(6772):853-8
10706275
J Pediatr. 2005 Apr;146(4):518-22
15812456
Sex Transm Dis. 2001 Jan;28(1):25-8
11196041
J Urban Health. 2003 Dec;80(4 Suppl 3):iii26-39
14713669
AIDS. 1992 Sep;6(9):983-9
1388911
AIDS. 2003 Apr 11;17(6):895-903
12660537
Lancet. 2002 Jun 1;359(9321):1896-903
12057552
Soc Sci Med. 1990;31(2):101-14
2389147
J Microbiol. 2005 Apr;43(2):133-43
15880088
Soc Sci Med. 2001 Mar;52(5):681-94
11218173
Sex Transm Dis. 1985 Jan-Mar;12(1):25-32
4002091
Sex Transm Dis. 2003 Jul;30(7):533-8
12838079
Chin Med J (Engl). 2004 Jan;117(1):14-8
14733766
Int J Parasitol. 2000 Nov;30(12-13):1395-405
11113264
J Infect Dis. 2005 Feb 1;191 Suppl 1:S42-54
15627230
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 19;103(51):19460-5
17158216
FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2002 Jun;26(2):125-39
12069878
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2002 May 1;30(1):95-104
12048369
NIDA Res Monogr. 1995;151:3-19
8742758
Arch Environ Health. 1997 Sep-Oct;52(5):348-54
9546757