How should gestational weight gain be assessed? A comparison of existing methods and a novel method, area under the weight gain curve.
BACKGROUND
Gestational weight gain is important to assess for epidemiological and public health purposes: it is correlated with infant growth and may be related to maternal outcomes such as reproductive health and chronic disease risk. Methods commonly used to assess weight gain incorporate assumptions that are usually not borne out, such as a linear weight gain, or do not account for differential length of gestation.


METHODS
We introduce a novel method to assess gestational weight gain, the area under the weight gain curve. This is easily interpretable as the additional pound-days carried due to pregnancy and avoids many flaws in alternative assessments. We compare the performance of the simple difference, weekly gain, Institute of Medicine categories and the area under the weight gain curve in predicting birthweight and maternal weight retention at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months postpartum. The analytic sample comprises 2016 participants in Project Viva, an observational prospective cohort study of pregnant women in Massachusetts.


RESULTS
For birthweight outcomes, none of the weight gain measures is a meaningfully superior predictor. For 6-month postpartum weight retention the simple difference is superior, while for 12-, 24- and 36-month weight retention the area under the weight gain curve is superior.


CONCLUSIONS
These findings are plausible biologically: the same amount of weight gained early vs later in the pregnancy may reflect increased maternal fat stores. The timing of weight gain is reflected best in the area under the weight gain curve. Different methods of measuring gestational weight gain may be appropriate depending on the context.
Kleinman
Ken P
KP
Obesity Prevention Program, Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, MA 02215, USA. Ken_Kleinman@hms.harvard.edu
Oken
Emily
E
Radesky
Jenny S
JS
Rich-Edwards
Janet W
JW
Peterson
Karen E
KE
Gillman
Matthew W
MW
D000328:Adult; D019540:Area Under Curve; D001724:Birth Weight; D015992:Body Mass Index; D004522:Educational Status; D005006:Ethnicity; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D049590:Postpartum Period / Q000502:physiology; D011247:Pregnancy / Q000502:physiology*; D011264:Pregnancy Trimesters; D015430:Weight Gain
Am J Epidemiol. 1992 Sep 1;136(5):574-83
1442721
Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Aug;96(2):194-200
10908762
Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 Jul;76(1):205-9
12081836
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Aug;187(2):312-8; discussion 318-20
12193918
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2003 Jan;27(1):117-27
12532163
Am J Clin Nutr. 2003 Apr;77(4):931-6
12663294
BMC Pediatr. 2003 Jul 8;3:6
12848901
J Pediatr. 2004 Feb;144(2):240-5
14760269
Am J Clin Nutr. 2004 Apr;79(4):646-52
15051610
Am J Epidemiol. 1982 Feb;115(2):223-30
7058781
J Chronic Dis. 1982;35(4):295-309
7061685
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1986 Nov;155(5):947-54
3619994
J Am Diet Assoc. 1989 May;89(5):634-8, 641
2723286
Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Jul;74(1):6-12
2733943
Obstet Gynecol. 1989 Oct;74(4):577-83
2797634
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jan;162(1):213-8
2301495
Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jun;75(6):948-53
2342743
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991 Feb;98(2):195-201
2004057
Obstet Gynecol. 1992 May;79(5 ( Pt 1)):664-9
1565346
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992 Aug;167(2):353-70; discussion 370-2
1497038
J Nutr. 2006 Jan;136(1):140-6
16365073
Am J Public Health. 1993 Aug;83(8):1100-3
8342716
Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Oct;84(4):565-73
8090394
Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jun;85(6):909-14
7770259
Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jun;85(6):947-51
7770265
Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Aug;86(2):163-9
7617344
Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Sep;86(3):423-7
7651655
J Nutr. 1996 Jan;126(1):146-53
8558295
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 1996 Jun;20(6):526-32
8782728
J Matern Fetal Med. 1996 Jul-Aug;5(4):168-73
8796789
Obstet Gynecol. 1996 Oct;88(4 Pt 1):490-6
8841205
JAMA. 1997 Mar 19;277(11):925-6
9062334
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Jun;176(6):1220-4; discussion 1224-7
9215177
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1997 Oct;11(4):392-406
9373862
Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jan;91(1):97-102
9464729
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1998 Jan;77(1):32-6
9492714
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 1998 May;38(2):176-9
9653855
Ann Hum Biol. 1998 Jul-Aug;25(4):331-43
9667359
Am J Public Health. 1998 Aug;88(8):1168-74
9702142
J Matern Fetal Med. 1998 Jul-Aug;7(4):190-3
9730485
Am J Public Health. 1998 Oct;88(10):1534-8
9772858
Epidemiology. 1999 Mar;10(2):141-7
10069249
J Nutr. 1999 May;129(5):988-93
10222390