Could increased axial wall stress be responsible for the development of atheroma in the proximal segment of myocardial bridges?
BACKGROUND
A recent model describing the mechanical interaction between a stenosis and the vessel wall has shown that axial wall stress can considerably increase in the region immediately proximal to the stenosis during the (forward) flow phases, so that abnormal biological processes and wall damages are likely to be induced in that region. Our objective was to examine what this model predicts when applied to myocardial bridges.


METHODS
The model was adapted to the hemodynamic particularities of myocardial bridges and used to estimate by means of a numerical example the cyclic increase in axial wall stress in the vessel segment proximal to the bridge. The consistence of the results with reported observations on the presence of atheroma in the proximal, tunneled, and distal vessel segments of bridged coronary arteries was also examined.


RESULTS
1) Axial wall stress can markedly increase in the entrance region of the bridge during the cardiac cycle. 2) This is consistent with reported observations showing that this region is particularly prone to atherosclerosis.


CONCLUSIONS
The proposed mechanical explanation of atherosclerosis in bridged coronary arteries indicates that angioplasty and other similar interventions will not stop the development of atherosclerosis at the bridge entrance and in the proximal epicardial segment if the decrease of the lumen of the tunneled segment during systole is not considerably reduced.
Doriot
Pierre-André
PA
Cardiology Department, University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland. pierre-andre.doriot@hcuge.ch
Dorsaz
Pierre-André
PA
Noble
Jacques
J
D000818:Animals; D003324:Coronary Artery Disease / Q000209:etiology*; D023921:Coronary Stenosis / Q000503:physiopathology; D006801:Humans; D015607:Stents; D013314:Stress, Mechanical
Biomed Eng Online. 2006;5:42
16790065
Int J Cardiol. 2007 Apr 25;117(2):e76-8
17328975
Eur Heart J. 1999 Dec;20(23):1707-16
10562478
Heart. 2000 Oct;84(4):403-8
10995410
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002 Dec;283(6):H2599-605
12388322
Circulation. 2002 Nov 12;106(20):2616-22
12427660
Phys Med Biol. 2003 Jan 7;48(1):127-38
12564505
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Feb 5;41(3):351-9
12575960
Cardiovasc Radiat Med. 2003 Apr-Jun;4(2):108-15
14581092
J Endovasc Ther. 2004 Jun;11(3):310-8
15174908
Jpn Heart J. 2004 Jul;45(4):581-9
15353869
Atherosclerosis. 1971 May-Jun;13(3):305-17
5119233
Arch Pathol. 1972 Jan;93(1):32-5
5006997
Am J Cardiol. 1976 Jun;37(7):993-9
1274883
Circ Res. 1976 Dec;39(6):828-32
1000776
Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol. 1977 Aug 9;375(1):23-36
143768
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1977 Oct;70(10):1075-9
413516
Circulation. 1980 Aug;62(2):230-7
7397963
Am Heart J. 1982 Feb;103(2):283-8
7055058
Chest. 1982 Feb;81(2):198-202
7056084
Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1982;16(2):151-5
7156925
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 1983 Jul-Aug;26(1):75-88
6346395
J Pathol. 1986 Apr;148(4):279-91
3701494
Surg Radiol Anat. 1988;10(2):113-20
3135616
Clin Radiol. 1989 Jul;40(4):355-9
2527105
Br Heart J. 1991 Nov;66(5):364-7
1747296
Hum Pathol. 1993 Jul;24(7):693-701
8319950
Circulation. 1994 Apr;89(4):1725-32
8149538
J Biomech Eng. 1994 Aug;116(3):302-6
7799631
Am Heart J. 1995 Apr;129(4):663-5
7900614
Br Heart J. 1995 May;73(5):462-5
7786662
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996 Jun;27(7):1637-45
8636548
Angiology. 1997 Feb;48(2):99-109
9040263
Virchows Arch. 1997 Feb;430(2):163-71
9083520
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1997 Apr;40(4):364-7
9096936
Circulation. 1997 Nov 4;96(9):2905-13
9386156
J Pathol. 1998 May;185(1):4-9
9713353
Am Heart J. 1951 Mar;41(3):359-68
14818948
Circulation. 1956 Feb;13(2):235-41
13356383
Am Heart J. 1961 Jan;61:44-52
13736661
Med Phys. 2005 Feb;32(2):360-8
15789580
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2005 Aug;33(8):684-6
16188047
Technol Health Care. 2006;14(2):59-68
16720949
J Anat. 2006 Jul;209(1):43-50
16822268