Dissociating object familiarity from linguistic properties in mirror word reading.
BACKGROUND
It is known that the orthographic properties of linguistic stimuli are processed within the left occipitotemporal cortex at about 150-200 ms. We recorded event-related potentials (ERPs) to words in standard or mirror orientation to investigate the role of visual word form in reading. Word inversion was performed to determine whether rotated words lose their linguistic properties.


METHODS
About 1300 Italian words and legal pseudo-words were presented to 18 right-handed Italian students engaged in a letter detection task. EEG was recorded from 128 scalp sites.


RESULTS
ERPs showed an early effect of word orientation at ~150 ms, with larger N1 amplitudes to rotated than to standard words. Low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (LORETA) revealed an increase in N1 to rotated words primarily in the right occipital lobe (BA 18), which may indicate an effect of stimulus familiarity. N1 was greater to target than to non-target letters at left lateral occipital sites, thus reflecting the first stage of orthographic processing. LORETA revealed a strong focus of activation for this effect in the left fusiform gyrus (BA 37), which is consistent with the so-called visual word form area (VWFA). Standard words (compared to pseudowords) elicited an enhancement of left occipito/temporal negativity at about 250-350 ms, followed by a larger anterior P3, a reduced frontal N400 and a huge late positivity. Lexical effects for rotated strings were delayed by about 100 ms at occipito/temporal sites, and were totally absent at later processing stages. This suggests the presence of implicit reading processes, which were pre-attentive and of perceptual nature for mirror strings.


CONCLUSIONS
The contrast between inverted and standard words did not lead to the identification of a purely linguistic brain region. This finding suggests some caveats in the interpretation of the inversion effect in subtractive paradigms.
Proverbio
Alice M
AM
Department of Psychology, University of Milano-Bicocca, Via dell'Innovazione 10, 20126 Milan, Italy. mado.proverbio@unimib.it.
Wiedemann
Friederike
F
Adorni
Roberta
R
Rossi
Valentina
V
Del Zotto
Marzia
M
Zani
Alberto
A
J Clin Neurophysiol. 2000 Mar;17(2):163-74
10831107
Behav Brain Funct. 2005 Aug 09;1:13
16091138
J Neurosci. 1996 Aug 15;16(16):5205-15
8756449
Cereb Cortex. 1998 Jan-Feb;8(1):1-10
9510380
Biol Psychol. 1999 Jul;50(3):173-89
10461804
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997 Mar;102(3):200-15
9129576
Ann Neurol. 1996 Aug;40(2):157-62
8773596
Cereb Cortex. 1999 Jul-Aug;9(5):476-83
10450892
Brain Res. 2006 Feb 16;1073-1074:431-9
16464440
Cereb Cortex. 2002 May;12(5):545-51
11950772
Neuroimage. 2007 Jul 1;36(3):863-76
17500010
Percept Psychophys. 1991 Oct;50(4):367-72
1758768
Neuroimage. 2004 Mar;21(3):829-39
15006649
Neuroimage. 2003 Jul;19(3):877-83
12880816
Neuroreport. 2000 Sep 28;11(14):3145-50
11043539
Curr Biol. 2004 Mar 9;14(5):391-6
15028214
Nature. 1994 Nov 17;372(6503):260-3
7969469
Cognition. 1998 Aug;68(1):B1-11
9775518
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2006 Dec 29;361(1476):2109-28
17118927
BMC Neurosci. 2006 Jun 08;7:44
16762056
Psychophysiology. 1998 May;35(3):240-51
9564744
Cereb Cortex. 1999 Jul-Aug;9(5):415-30
10450888
Cereb Cortex. 2004 Feb;14(2):132-42
14704210
Neuroimage. 2004 Apr;21(4):1518-32
15050576
J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Feb 15;15(2):260-71
12676063
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Aug;24(3):663-73
15890502
Brain. 2000 Apr;123 ( Pt 4):790-9
10734010
Int J Psychophysiol. 1994 Oct;18(1):49-65
7876038
Neuroimage. 2007 May 1;35(4):1495-501
17363282
Cogn Neuropsychol. 2006 May 1;23(3):355-75
21049335
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Dec 7;271 Suppl 6:S448-50
15801600
Dev Sci. 2006 May;9(3):270-7
16669797
Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Jul;7(7):293-299
12860187
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1998 Jan;6(3):193-203
9479071
J Neurosci. 1997 Jun 1;17(11):4302-11
9151747
Neuroreport. 2001 Feb 12;12(2):207-13
11209922
J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Feb 15;14(2):145-59
11970782
Brain. 1999 Nov;122 ( Pt 11):2119-32
10545397
J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Mar;16(2):301-17
15068599
Neuron. 1999 Jan;22(1):189-99
10027301
J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Aug 15;14(6):938-50
12191460
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Oct;17(10):1532-52
16269095
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Jan;19(1):132-46
17214570
Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(7):1145-58
16303149
Neuroimage. 2003 Nov;20(3):1609-24
14642472
Neuron. 2004 Dec 2;44(5):889-98
15572118
Neuroimage. 2004 Mar;21(3):946-53
15006661
Brain Res. 2006 Jul 7;1098(1):153-60
16774747
Neuropsychologia. 1971 Mar;9(1):97-113
5146491
J Vis. 2003;3(6):440-55
12901715
J Cogn Neurosci. 1999 May;11(3):235-60
10402254
Cereb Cortex. 2007 Apr;17(4):982-92
16754652
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 May;18(5):818-32
16768380
Neuroreport. 1999 Jan 18;10(1):189-94
10094160
Neuroreport. 2004 Jun 7;15(8):1261-5
15167545
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Feb 4;100(3):1415-9
12552093
Neuroimage. 2004 May;22(1):466-76
15110040
Science. 1990 Aug 31;249(4972):1041-4
2396097
J Exp Psychol Gen. 1986 Jun;115(2):107-17
2940312