Proprioception contributes to the sense of agency during visual observation of hand movements: evidence from temporal judgments of action.
The ability to recognize visually one's own movement is important for motor control and, through attribution of agency, for social interactions. Agency of actions may be decided by comparisons of visual feedback, efferent signals, and proprioceptive inputs. Because the ability to identify one's own visual feedback from passive movements is decreased relative to active movements, or in some cases is even absent, the role of proprioception in self-recognition has been questioned. Proprioception during passive and active movements may, however, differ, and so to address any role for proprioception in the sense of agency, the active movement condition must be examined. Here we tested a chronically deafferented man (I.W.) and an age-matched group of six healthy controls in a task requiring judgement of the timing of action. Subjects performed finger movements and watched a visual cursor that moved either synchronously or asynchronously with a random delay, and reported whether or not they felt they controlled the cursor. Movement accuracy was matched between groups. In the absence of proprioception, I.W. was less able than the control group to discriminate self- from computer-produced cursor movement based on the timing of movement. In a control visual discrimination task with concurrent similar finger movements but no agency detection, I.W. was unimpaired, suggesting that this effect was task specific. We conclude that proprioception does contribute to the visual identification of ownership during active movements and, thus, to the sense of agency.
Balslev
Daniela
D
University of Birmingham, UK. daniela@nru.dk
Cole
Jonathan
J
Miall
R Chris
RC
D016022:Case-Control Studies; D006225:Hand; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology*; D010523:Peripheral Nervous System Diseases / Q000503:physiopathology; D011434:Proprioception / Q000502:physiology*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis
Nat Neurosci. 1998 Nov;1(7):635-40
10196573
Science. 2003 Jul 11;301(5630):187
12855800
Cognition. 2005 Jul;96(3):215-31
15996559
Science. 1995 Sep 29;269(5232):1880-2
7569931
Neurology. 2000 Jun 27;54(12):2230-6
10881245
Neuropsychologia. 1994 Sep;32(9):1079-88
7991075
Prog Brain Res. 1999;123:133-42
10635710
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996 Oct 29;351(1346):1505-12
8941962
J Physiol. 2001 Oct 15;536(Pt 2):635-47
11600696
Brain Res Brain Res Rev. 2000 Mar;31(2-3):357-63
10719163
J Neurophysiol. 1995 Jan;73(1):361-72
7714578
Exp Brain Res. 2000 May;132(1):114-26
10836641
Neurology. 2003 Jun 24;60(12):1998-9
12821752
J Physiol. 1982 Jan;322:167-79
6461756
Nat Neurosci. 2002 Apr;5(4):382-5
11896397
Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Jan;4(1):14-21
10637618
J Physiol. 1992 Apr;449:503-15
1522522
Conscious Cogn. 2003 Dec;12(4):609-19
14656504