title: Preferences of patients with heart failure for prognosis communication.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Communication about prognosis is fundamental to discussions and planning for end-of-life (EOL) care for patients with advanced heart failure (HF). Little is known about the preferences of patients that could guide communication about prognosis.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To identify the preferences of patients with advanced HF regarding communication about their prognosis and its implications.
  
  
  METHODS
  A qualitative study using a grounded theory methodology, based on one-to-one interviews with 20 patients recruited from Heart Function Clinic at the McMaster University Medical Centre in Hamilton, Ontario.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The following four main themes about patient preferences were identified: level of wellness--patients wanted to learn about their prognosis and its implications at a time of optimal cognitive function, and not when their capacity for EOL decision making was diminished; opportunity to be informed--patients preferred physicians to initiate discussions about prognosis at the time of diagnosis; tell the truth--there was a strong preference for physicians to disclose prognostic possibilities, treatments and outcomes associated with HF, including the possibilities of deterioration and death; and maintain hope--there was a need for truth to be balanced with hope. Hope for quality of life, symptom control and control over EOL decisions were important to participants.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The findings suggested that communication about prognosis between patients and physicians may be difficult and deferred. Preferences identified by patients offer guidance to physicians in planning and initiating dialogue about prognosis.
authors: Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. caldwep@mcmaster.ca
authors: Patricia H
authors: PH
authors: Caldwell
authors: Heather M
authors: HM
authors: Arthur
authors: Catherine
authors: C
authors: Demers
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D005260:Female; D006333:Heart Failure / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000523:psychology* / Q000628:therapy; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008297:Male; D008485:Medical Audit; D008875:Middle Aged; D009864:Ontario; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D011379:Prognosis; D036301:Qualitative Research; D013727:Terminal Care / Q000523:psychology*; D014342:Truth Disclosure
references: JAMA. 2000 Nov 15;284(19):2502-7
references: 11074781
references: J Nurs Scholarsh. 2001;33(1):21-6
references: 11253576
references: Intern Med J. 2001 Jul;31(5):290-5
references: 11512600
references: BMJ. 2002 Sep 14;325(7364):581-5
references: 12228136
references: J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 1;23(13):3146-50
references: 15860876
references: Can J Cardiol. 2003 Mar 31;19(4):347-56
references: 12704478
references: JAMA. 2004 May 26;291(20):2476-82
references: 15161899
references: J Card Fail. 2004 Jun;10(3):200-9
references: 15190529
references: J Clin Oncol. 2005 Feb 20;23(6):1278-88
references: 15718326
references: BMJ. 2002 Oct 26;325(7370):929
references: 12399341