title: Human and animal cognition: continuity and discontinuity.
abstract: Microscopic study of the human brain has revealed neural structures, enhanced wiring, and forms of connectivity among nerve cells not found in any animal, challenging the view that the human brain is simply an enlarged chimpanzee brain. On the other hand, cognitive studies have found animals to have abilities once thought unique to the human. This suggests a disparity between brain and mind. The suggestion is misleading. Cognitive research has not kept pace with neural research. Neural findings are based on microscopic study of the brain and are primarily cellular. Because cognition cannot be studied microscopically, we need to refine the study of cognition by using a different approach. In examining claims of similarity between animals and humans, one must ask: What are the dissimilarities? This approach prevents confusing similarity with equivalence. We follow this approach in examining eight cognitive cases--teaching, short-term memory, causal reasoning, planning, deception, transitive inference, theory of mind, and language--and find, in all cases, that similarities between animal and human abilities are small, dissimilarities large. There is no disparity between brain and mind.
authors: University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. dpremack@aol.com
authors: David
authors: D
authors: Premack
mesh_terms: D000819:Animal Communication; D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D001921:Brain / Q000502:physiology*; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D009434:Neural Pathways / Q000502:physiology; D013663:Teaching / Q000379:methods
references: Cognition. 1990 Jul;36(1):1-16
references: 2383967
references: Genet Soc Gen Psychol Monogr. 1997 May;123(2):133-67
references: 9204544
references: Science. 2001 Jan 26;291(5504):657-61
references: 11158678
references: Cognition. 1987 Apr;25(3):265-88
references: 3581732
references: Cereb Cortex. 2007 Oct;17(10):2312-21
references: 17182969
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Nov;9(6):848-56
references: 23964604
references: Am J Phys Anthropol. 2001 Mar;114(3):224-41
references: 11241188
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Dec 15;89(24):12137-9
references: 1465451
references: Cognition. 1985 Apr;19(3):207-96
references: 4017517
references: Nature. 2000 Jan 6;403(6765):39-40
references: 10638743
references: J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):1-16
references: 5875341
references: J Comp Psychol. 2006 Nov;120(4):345-57
references: 17115855
references: Nature. 2006 Apr 27;440(7088):1204-7
references: 16641998
references: Brain Behav Evol. 2002;60(3):125-51
references: 12417819
references: Cereb Cortex. 2002 Jul;12(7):671-91
references: 12050080
references: Science. 2006 May 19;312(5776):1038-40
references: 16709782
references: Science. 2006 Jul 14;313(5784):227-9
references: 16840701
references: Nature. 2007 Feb 22;445(7130):919-21
references: 17314979
references: Science. 2006 Feb 17;311(5763):1020-2
references: 16484500
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1991 Jul;17(3):281-91
references: 1890386
references: Cell. 2005 Feb 11;120(3):421-33
references: 15707899
references: Science. 2004 Jan 16;303(5656):318-20
references: 14726578
references: J Comp Psychol. 1992 Dec;106(4):342-9
references: 1451416
references: Nature. 1977 Jun 23;267(5613):694-6
references: 406574
references: Trends Neurosci. 1998 Aug;21(8):355-61
references: 9720604
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Apr 27;96(9):5268-73
references: 10220455
references: Nature. 2007 Jan 25;445(7126):429-32
references: 17251980