Global transcription profiling reveals differential responses to chronic nitrogen stress and putative nitrogen regulatory components in Arabidopsis.
BACKGROUND
A large quantity of nitrogen (N) fertilizer is used for crop production to achieve high yields at a significant economic and environmental cost. Efforts have been directed to understanding the molecular basis of plant responses to N and identifying N-responsive genes in order to manipulate their expression, thus enabling plants to use N more efficiently. No studies have yet delineated these responses at the transcriptional level when plants are grown under chronic N stress and the understanding of regulatory elements involved in N response is very limited.


RESULTS
To further our understanding of the response of plants to varying N levels, a growth system was developed where N was the growth-limiting factor. An Arabidopsis whole genome microarray was used to evaluate global gene expression under different N conditions. Differentially expressed genes under mild or severe chronic N stress were identified. Mild N stress triggered only a small set of genes significantly different at the transcriptional level, which are largely involved in various stress responses. Plant responses were much more pronounced under severe N stress, involving a large number of genes in many different biological processes. Differentially expressed genes were also identified in response to short- and long-term N availability increases. Putative N regulatory elements were determined along with several previously known motifs involved in the responses to N and carbon availability as well as plant stress.


CONCLUSIONS
Differentially expressed genes identified provide additional insights into the coordination of the complex N responses of plants and the components of the N response mechanism. Putative N regulatory elements were identified to reveal possible new components of the regulatory network for plant N responses. A better understanding of the complex regulatory network for plant N responses will help lead to strategies to improve N use efficiency.
Bi
Yong-Mei
YM
Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, N1G 2W1, Canada. ybi@uoguelph.ca
Wang
Rong-Lin
RL
Zhu
Tong
T
Rothstein
Steven J
SJ
D017360:Arabidopsis / Q000235:genetics / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism*; D020869:Gene Expression Profiling; D017343:Genes, Plant; D009584:Nitrogen / Q000378:metabolism*; D014158:Transcription, Genetic
D009584:Nitrogen
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 16;102(33):11934-9
16085708
Trends Plant Sci. 2004 Dec;9(12):597-605
15564127
Plant Physiol. 1994 Feb;104(2):497-503
12232098
J Plant Res. 2006 Jul;119(4):407-13
16820983
Arabidopsis Book. 2002;1:e0011
22303192
Genome Biol. 2004;5(11):R91
15535867
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Sep;83(18):6825-8
16593758
Plant Physiol. 2004 Apr;134(4):1718-32
15084732
Arabidopsis Book. 2003;2:e0010
22303223
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2001 Jun;4(3):247-53
11312136
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Apr 24;98(9):5116-21
11309499
Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Jan 1;27(1):297-300
9847208
Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1996 Jun;47:569-593
15012301
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 May 18;101(20):7833-8
15136740
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 1999 Jun;2(3):178-86
10375569
Plant Cell. 1995 Jul;7(7):1085-1097
12242399
Plant Physiol. 1999 Sep;121(1):301-10
10482686
Plant Physiol. 2001 Jan;125(1):61-4
11154297
Nature. 2005 Feb 24;433(7028):791
15729306
Pac Symp Biocomput. 2001;:127-38
11262934
Plant Mol Biol. 2006 Jan;60(1):107-24
16463103
Nature. 2003 Oct 30;425(6961):894-5
14586437
Nature. 2006 Aug 24;442(7105):939-42
16878138
Plant Physiol. 2004 Sep;136(1):2483-99
15375205
Plant Physiol. 2003 Jun;132(2):556-67
12805587
Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2000 Jul;64(7):1402-9
10945256
Plant J. 2005 Nov;44(4):680-92
16262716
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Aug 17;101(33):12114-9
15297614
Plant Mol Biol. 1997 Jun;34(3):465-76
9225857
Plant Cell Physiol. 2006 Jan;47(1):74-83
16284408
Plant Cell. 2004 Oct;16(10):2586-600
15367721
Science. 1998 Jan 16;279(5349):407-9
9430595
Plant Physiol. 1993 Nov;103(3):829-34
8022938
J Exp Bot. 2004 Jan;55(395):225-36
14673035
Plant Cell. 2000 Mar;12(3):393-404
10715325
Plant J. 2007 Apr;50(2):320-37
17355433
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1986 Nov;83(21):8073-6
16593773
Plant Cell. 2000 Dec;12(12):2383-2394
11148285
Plant Physiol. 1994 Oct;106(2):477-84
7991680
Plant Mol Biol. 1991 Jul;17(1):9-18
1868226
Trends Plant Sci. 2000 May;5(5):199-206
10785665
Plant Mol Biol. 2006 Mar;60(5):617-31
16649102
Plant J. 2005 Dec;44(6):960-71
16359389
Plant Cell. 1995 Jul;7(7):859-68
7640524
Plant Cell. 2004 Aug;16(8):2128-50
15273295
Plant Cell. 2005 Nov;17(11):3155-75
16214899
Plant J. 2000 Feb;21(3):281-8
10758479
Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol. 1999 Jun;50:277-303
15012211
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003 Oct;6(5):418-25
12972041
Plant Physiol. 2005 Nov;139(3):1304-12
16244146
Plant Physiol. 2003 Jun;132(2):893-906
12805619
Curr Genet. 1992 Jan;21(1):37-41
1531184
Science. 2000 Dec 15;290(5499):2105-10
11118137
Plant J. 1999 Jun;18(5):509-19
10417701
Trends Plant Sci. 2002 Dec;7(12):555-60
12475498
Plant Cell. 1997 May;9(5):783-798
12237366
Plant Cell. 2000 Aug;12(8):1491-509
10948265