title: Genetic effects on coat colour in cattle: dilution of eumelanin and phaeomelanin pigments in an F2-Backcross Charolais x Holstein population.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  In cattle, the gene coding for the melanocortin receptor 1 (MC1R) is known to be the main regulator of the switch between the two coat colour pigments: eumelanin (black pigment) and phaeomelanin (red pigment). Some breeds, such as Charolais and Simmental, exhibit a lightening of the original pigment over the whole body. The dilution mutation in Charolais (Dc) is responsible for the white coat colour of this breed. Using an F2-Backcross Charolais x Holstein population which includes animals with both pigment backgrounds, we present a linkage mapping study of the Charolais dilution locus.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A Charolais x Holstein crossbred population was investigated for genetic effects on coat colour dilution. Three different traits representing the dilution of the phaeomelanin, eumelanin, and non-pigment-specific dilution were defined. Highly significant genome-wide associations were detected on chromosome 5 for the three traits analysed in the marker interval [ETH10-DIK5248]. The SILV gene was examined as the strongest positional and functional candidate gene. A previously reported non-synonymous mutation in exon 1 of this gene, SILV c.64A>G, was associated with the coat colour dilution phenotype in this resource population. Although some discrepancies were identified between this mutation and the dilution phenotype, no convincing recombination events were found between the SILV c.64A>G mutation and the Dc locus. Further analysis identified a region on chromosome 28 influencing the variation in pigment intensity for a given coat colour category.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The present study has identified a region on bovine chromosome 5 that harbours the major locus responsible for the dilution of the eumelanin and phaeomelanin seen in Charolais crossbred cattle. In this study, no convincing evidence was found to exclude SILV c.64A>G as the causative mutation for the Charolais dilution phenotype, although other genetic effects may influence the coat colour variation in the population studied. A region on chromosome 28 influences the intensity of pigment within coat colour categories, and therefore may include a modifier of the Dc locus. A candidate gene for this effect, LYST, was identified.
authors: Roslin Institute (Edinburgh), Roslin, Midlothian, Scotland. beatriz.gutierrez@unileon.es
authors: Beatriz
authors: B
authors: Gutiérrez-Gil
authors: Pamela
authors: P
authors: Wiener
authors: John L
authors: JL
authors: Williams
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle / Q000235:genetics*; D002874:Chromosome Mapping; D033481:Chromosomes, Mammalian; D003433:Crosses, Genetic; D005260:Female; D008040:Genetic Linkage; D005838:Genotype; D006200:Hair Color / Q000235:genetics*; D008297:Male; D008543:Melanins / Q000235:genetics*; D010375:Pedigree; D010641:Phenotype; D016133:Polymerase Chain Reaction; D040641:Quantitative Trait Loci; D017422:Sequence Analysis, DNA
chemical_list: D008543:Melanins; C041877:eumelanin
references: Pigment Cell Res. 2003 Aug;16(4):333-44
references: 12859616
references: Anim Genet. 2003 Jun;34(3):169-75
references: 12755816
references: J Endocrinol. 1986 Apr;109(1):15-21
references: 3084696
references: FASEB J. 1991 Nov;5(14):2902-9
references: 1752358
references: Cell. 1993 Mar 26;72(6):827-34
references: 8458079
references: Nature. 1993 Apr 15;362(6421):587-8
references: 8385273
references: Arch Biochem Biophys. 1994 May 15;311(1):95-102
references: 8185325
references: Mamm Genome. 1999 Dec;10(12):1168-71
references: 10594241
references: Anim Genet. 2000 Apr;31(2):87-90
references: 10782205
references: J Cell Biol. 2001 Feb 19;152(4):809-24
references: 11266471
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Sep 11;98(19):10698-703
references: 11526213
references: Genetics. 1994 Mar;136(3):1195-207
references: 8005424
references: Nature. 1994 Oct 27;371(6500):799-802
references: 7935841
references: J Biol Chem. 1994 Nov 18;269(46):29198-205
references: 7961886
references: Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):963-71
references: 7851788
references: Nat Genet. 1995 Nov;11(3):241-7
references: 7581446
references: J Hered. 1995 Sep-Oct;86(5):395-8
references: 7560875
references: Mamm Genome. 1995 Sep;6(9):636-9
references: 8535072
references: J Anim Sci. 1996 Jan;74(1):262
references: 8778108
references: Genetics. 1996 Jun;143(2):1013-20
references: 8725246
references: Am J Vet Res. 1997 Nov;58(11):1221-6
references: 9361882
references: Genetics. 1998 Jun;149(2):1069-80
references: 9611214
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jun 23;95(13):7374-8
references: 9636156
references: Genetics. 2004 Nov;168(3):1507-18
references: 15579702
references: Pigment Cell Res. 2005 Oct;18(5):322-36
references: 16162173
references: J Anim Breed Genet. 2005 Oct;122(5):357-60
references: 16191045
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 31;103(5):1376-81
references: 16407134
references: Pigment Cell Res. 2006 Jun;19(3):250-2; author reply 253-7
references: 16704461
references: BMC Genet. 2006;7:46
references: 17029645
references: Anim Genet. 2007 Apr;38(2):109-13
references: 17302792
references: Bioinformatics. 2002 Feb;18(2):339-40
references: 11847090
references: J Hered. 2002 Jan-Feb;93(1):1-8
references: 12011168
references: J Recept Signal Transduct Res. 2002 Feb-Nov;22(1-4):421-30
references: 12503631
references: Genome Res. 2004 Oct;14(10A):1987-98
references: 15466297