Relapse to prior therapy is the most important factor for the retreatment response in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection.
BACKGROUND
Treatment options for hepatitis C have developed rapidly in the past decade. The current treatment of choice is a combination of pegylated-interferon-alpha (PEG-IFN-alpha) and ribavirin. With the development of more therapy options, patients who failed in prior therapy hope to clear hepatitis C virus by undergoing a more effective retreatment regime. In this report, we investigated response rates to combination therapy [standard IFN-alpha or PEG-IFN-alpha and ribavirin] in patients who relapsed or failed in prior therapy.


METHODS
Ninety-three patients were included in this retrospective study. All patients failed to previous IFN-alpha monotherapy (n=55) or to a combination of standard IFN-alpha and ribavirin (n=38). Fifty-nine patients were nonresponders and 34 were relapsers. Thirty-five patients were retreated with standard IFN-alpha plus ribavirin and 58 received PEG-IFN-alpha combination therapy.


RESULTS
Sustained virologic response (SVR) was induced in 31% of all patients. The highest SVR rate (58%) was observed in relapsers to standard IFN-alpha combination therapy who were retreated with PEG-IFN-alpha combination therapy. The SVR rate in relapsers to standard IFN-alpha monotherapy who received a standard IFN-alpha combination therapy was 50%. Relapsers responded in a significantly higher proportion to retreatment than nonresponders (56% vs. 17%, P<0.001). Relapse to previous therapy was identified as an independent predictor for therapy response. The lowest SVR rate was observed in nonresponders to standard IFN-alpha combination therapy who were retreated with PEG-IFN-alpha combination therapy (1/26; 4%).


CONCLUSIONS
In relapsers, retreatment with the most effective therapy regime to date a combination of PEG-IFN-alpha and ribavirin, is promising. However, retreatment with PEG-IFN-alpha combination therapy in nonresponders to standard IFN combination therapy is not effective.
Sagir
Abdurrahman
A
Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Universitätsklinik Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany. sagir@med.uni-duesseldorf.de
Heintges
Tobias
T
Akyazi
Zübeyde
Z
Oette
Mark
M
Erhardt
Andreas
A
Häussinger
Dieter
D
D000328:Adult; D000998:Antiviral Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D004359:Drug Therapy, Combination; D005260:Female; D005838:Genotype; D016174:Hepacivirus / Q000235:genetics; D019698:Hepatitis C, Chronic / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000235:genetics; D006801:Humans; D000077190:Interferon alpha-2; D016898:Interferon-alpha / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D018579:Patient Selection; D011092:Polyethylene Glycols / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D012367:RNA, Viral / Q000097:blood; D011994:Recombinant Proteins; D012008:Recurrence; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012254:Ribavirin / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D017211:Treatment Failure; D019562:Viral Load
D000998:Antiviral Agents; D000077190:Interferon alpha-2; D016898:Interferon-alpha; D012367:RNA, Viral; D011994:Recombinant Proteins; D011092:Polyethylene Glycols; D012254:Ribavirin; C417083:peginterferon alfa-2b; C100416:peginterferon alfa-2a