title: Preventive home visits to older people in Denmark--why, how, by whom, and when?
abstract: In Denmark, political decisions improved the implementation of 'preventative thinking' into every-day clinical work. The potential benefits of preventive efforts have been supported by legislative and administrative incentives, and an ongoing effort to remain focused on the benefits of these initiatives towards older people is politically formulated and underlined as part of the new structured municipality reform. Evidence of beneficial effects of health promotion and prevention of disease in old age is well documented. In-home visits with individualised assessments make it possible to reach older persons not normally seen in the health care system. In-home assessment is not just a health check, but also an opportunity to meet individual needs that may be of importance for older people to stay independent. Preventive home visits may be part of an overall culture and strategy to avoid or prevent functional decline. There is an urgent need of an interdisciplinary teamwork and management for such programmes, incorporating flexible cooperation between the primary and secondary health care sector. The value and importance of geriatric and gerontological education is evidence based.
authors: Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, University Hospital, Øster Farimagsgade 5, 1014, Copenhagen K, Denmark. m.vass@daldnet.dk
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Vass
authors: K
authors: K
authors: Avlund
authors: C
authors: C
authors: Hendriksen
authors: L
authors: L
authors: Philipson
authors: P
authors: P
authors: Riis
mesh_terms: D000203:Activities of Daily Living / Q000145:classification; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002908:Chronic Disease / Q000517:prevention & control*; D003718:Denmark; D015577:Geriatric Assessment; D006792:House Calls; D006801:Humans; D009313:National Health Programs / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D020380:Needs Assessment / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D010348:Patient Care Team / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*
references: Age Ageing. 2002 Nov;31(6):463-7
references: 12446293
references: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):724-6
references: 15817025
references: Age Ageing. 2003 Nov;32(6):579-84
references: 14599997
references: Eur J Ageing. 2007 Aug 22;4(3):133-140
references: 28794782
references: Public Health Nurs. 2000 Nov-Dec;17(6):405-14
references: 11115138
references: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Apr;53(4):563-8
references: 15816999
references: Scand J Prim Health Care. 2004 Jun;22(2):106-11
references: 15255491
references: BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):754-8
references: 10720360
references: Eur J Health Econ. 2006 Dec;7(4):238-46
references: 16763802
references: Can Fam Physician. 2005 Sep;51:1244-5
references: 16926937
references: BMJ. 2001 Jul 7;323(7303):1-2
references: 11440920
references: Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2003 Oct;36(5):378-91
references: 14579065
references: J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 Sep;60(9):954-62
references: 17689812
references: Aging Clin Exp Res. 2002 Dec;14(6):509-15
references: 12674492
references: JAMA. 2002 Feb 27;287(8):1022-8
references: 11866651