Pancreatic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: the impact of a standardized technique of pancreaticojejunostomy.
BACKGROUND
The leading cause for morbidity and mortality after pancreaticoduodenectomy is a pancreatic anastomotic leak and fistula. The two most commonly performed anastomoses after pancreaticoduodenectomy are pancreaticogastrostomy (PG) and pancreaticojejunostomy (PJ). The role of standardization on outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy has not been sufficiently addressed.


OBJECTIVE
The goal is to study the impact of a standardized technique of pancreatic anastomosis (PJ) after pancreaticoduodenectomy in a tertiary referral cancer teaching hospital.


METHODS
A single-institution database was analyzed over 15 years. The entire data were subdivided into two periods, viz., period A (1992 to 2001), when PG (dunking) was predominantly used, and period B (2003-2007), when a standardized technique of PJ (duct to mucosa) was employed.


RESULTS
There were 144 pancreaticoduodenectomies performed during period A with a pancreatic fistula rate of 16%. During period B, 123 pancreaticoduodenectomies were performed with a pancreatic fistula rate of 3.2% (p < 0.0005).


CONCLUSIONS
It appears that a standardized approach to the pancreatic anastomosis and a consistent practice of a single technique can help to reduce the incidence of complications after pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Shrikhande
Shailesh V
SV
Gastrointestinal Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Ernest Borges Marg, Parel, Mumbai 400 012, India. shailushrikhande@hotmail.com
Barreto
George
G
Shukla
Parul J
PJ
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D014670:Ampulla of Vater / Q000601:surgery*; D000714:Anastomosis, Surgical / Q000592:standards; D002423:Cause of Death; D015331:Cohort Studies; D003138:Common Bile Duct Neoplasms / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D004379:Duodenal Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery; D005260:Female; D017052:Hospital Mortality; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010185:Pancreatic Fistula / Q000209:etiology* / Q000401:mortality / Q000517:prevention & control; D010190:Pancreatic Neoplasms / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D016577:Pancreaticoduodenectomy / Q000592:standards*; D010193:Pancreaticojejunostomy / Q000592:standards*; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology* / Q000517:prevention & control; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012307:Risk Factors; D013529:Surgical Wound Dehiscence / Q000209:etiology / Q000401:mortality; D013536:Suture Techniques / Q000592:standards; D055815:Young Adult
J Gastrointest Surg. 1999 May-Jun;3(3):225-32
10481115
Ann Surg. 2005 Dec;242(6):767-71, discussion 771-3
16327486
Br J Surg. 2005 Mar;92(3):356-61
15672425
Am J Surg. 2005 Jun;189(6):720-9
15910726
World J Surg. 2005 Dec;29(12):1642-9
16311866
Ann Surg. 1995 Oct;222(4):580-8; discussion 588-92
7574936
Ann Surg. 1990 Apr;211(4):447-58
2322039
Am J Surg. 2007 Feb;193(2):171-83
17236843
ANZ J Surg. 2004 Nov;74(11):945-50
15550080
Am J Surg. 2002 Feb;183(2):138-41
11918876
Br J Surg. 2000 Jul;87(7):883-9
10931023
Ann Surg Oncol. 2002 Nov;9(9):847-54
12417505
N Engl J Med. 2003 Nov 27;349(22):2117-27
14645640
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2002;9(6):733-7
12658408
Br J Surg. 2006 Aug;93(8):929-36
16845693
Am J Surg. 2002 Mar;183(3):283-5
11943127
Br J Surg. 2002 Oct;89(10):1245-51
12296891
Surgery. 2005 Jul;138(1):8-13
16003309
Am J Surg. 1998 Sep;176(3):274-8
9776158
Ann Surg. 1993 May;217(5):430-5; discussion 435-8
8098202