Comparative efficacy of low dose, daily versus alternate day plasma exchange in severe myasthenia gravis: a randomised trial.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the comparative efficacy of low dose daily versus alternate day plasma exchange in patients with severe myasthenia.


METHODS
Thirty three patients with myasthenia gravis (Osserman's stage II b and III) were randomized to receive alternate day (n = 17) or daily low dose plasma exchange (n = 16). Plasma exchange were carried on each patient, number of exchanges varying subject to their requirements and 20-25 ml/kg plasma was removed during each session. Myasthenia gravis disease scale (MGDS) score was evaluated before and after the procedure. Time to wean off ventilator, removal of nasogastric tube and total duration of hospital stay were also assessed.


RESULTS
There was no statistically significant difference between daily vs. alternate day group with regards to change in MGDS score, percentage change in MGDS score, and complication rates. A decreased hospital stay was observed in patients on daily plasma exchange which almost reached statistical significance.


CONCLUSIONS
We conclude from our study that daily and alternate day plasma exchange are similar in their efficacy and complication rates, however the daily schedule could be a preferred modality due to decreased hospital stay.
Trikha
Isha
I
Department of Neurology, Neurosciences Centre, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India.
Singh
Sumit
S
Goyal
Vinay
V
Shukla
Garima
G
Bhasin
Rama
R
Behari
Madhuri
M
D000328:Adult; D004334:Drug Administration Schedule; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009157:Myasthenia Gravis / Q000628:therapy*; D010951:Plasma Exchange / Q000379:methods*; D010956:Plasmapheresis / Q000379:methods; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D013997:Time Factors
Ther Apher. 2000 Aug;4(4):280-6
10975474
N Engl J Med. 1978 Feb 23;298(8):456-7
622126
J Neurol. 1991 Apr;238(2):103-7
1856735
Int J Artif Organs. 2003 Feb;26(2):170-3
12653352
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1987;505:584-7
3479939
Can J Surg. 1984 May;27(3):303-5
6722680
Arch Neurol. 1981 Aug;38(8):478-81
7247783
Chest. 1984 Jul;86(1):67-71
6734295
Arch Neurol. 1982 Jun;39(6):350-4
7092611
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1985 Apr;89(4):592-6
3982061
Lancet. 1976 Dec 25;2(8000):1373-6
63848
Int J Artif Organs. 1985 May;8(3):159-62
4030134
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1981;377:700-8
6951494