title: Different effects of static versus cyclic compressive loading on rat intervertebral disc height and water loss in vitro.
abstract: METHODS
  In vitro biomechanical study on rat caudal motion segments to evaluate association between compressive loading and water content under static and cyclic conditions.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To test hypotheses: 1) there is no difference in height loss and fluid (volume) loss of discs loaded in compression under cyclic (0.15-1.0 MPa) and static conditions with the same root-mean-square (RMS) magnitudes (0.575 MPa); and 2) after initial disc bulge, tissue water loss is directly proportional to height loss under static loading.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Disc degeneration affects water content, elastic and viscoelastic behaviors. There is limited understanding of the association between transient water loss and viscoelastic creep in a controlled in vitro environment where inferences may be made regarding mechanisms of viscoelasticity.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 126 caudal motion segments from 21 Wistar rats were tested in compression using 1 of 6 protocols: Static loading at 1.0 MPa for 9, 90, and 900 minutes, Cyclic loading at 0.15 to 1.0 MPa/1 Hz for 90 minutes, Mid-Static loading at 0.575 MPa for 90 minutes, and control. Water content was then measured in anulus and nucleus regions.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Percent water loss was significantly greater in nucleus than anulus regions, suggesting some water redistribution, with average values under 1 MPa static loading of 23.0% and 14.9% after 90 minutes and 26.9% and 17.6% after 900 minutes, respectively. Cyclic loading resulted in significantly greater height loss (0.506 +/- 0.108 mm) than static loading with the same RMS value (0.402 +/- 0.096 mm), but not significantly less than static loading at peak value (0.539 +/- 0.122 mm). Significant and strong correlations were found between percent water loss and disc height loss, suggesting water was lost through volume decrease.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Peak magnitude of cyclic compression and not RMS value was most important in determining height change and water loss, likely due to differences between disc creep and recovery rates. Water redistribution from nucleus to anulus occurred under loading consistent with an initial elastic compression (and associated disc bulge) followed by a reduction in disc volume over time.
authors: University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
authors: Kazunori
authors: K
authors: Masuoka
authors: Arthur J
authors: AJ
authors: Michalek
authors: Jeffrey J
authors: JJ
authors: MacLean
authors: Ian A F
authors: IA
authors: Stokes
authors: James C
authors: JC
authors: Iatridis
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001834:Body Water / Q000502:physiology*; D019245:Compressive Strength / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D007403:Intervertebral Disc / Q000502:physiology*; D051381:Rats; D017208:Rats, Wistar; D014870:Water Loss, Insensible / Q000502:physiology*; D016474:Weight-Bearing / Q000502:physiology
references: J Clin Invest. 1996 Aug 15;98(4):996-1003
references: 8770872
references: J Biomech. 2007;40(1):55-63
references: 16427060
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Jan 15;22(2):133-9
references: 9122792
references: Clin Anat. 1998;11(1):1-8
references: 9445091
references: Surg Radiol Anat. 1998;20(6):403-7
references: 9932324
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999 May 15;24(10):1015-22
references: 10332795
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1964 Jul;46:1077-92
references: 14193834
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Mar 15;25(6):662-9
references: 10752096
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Apr 15;26(8):883-8
references: 11317110
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 May 1;26(9):E174-81
references: 11337634
references: J Spinal Disord Tech. 2002 Apr;15(2):157-63
references: 11927827
references: Ann Biomed Eng. 2002 Nov-Dec;30(10):1234-41
references: 12540199
references: J Biomech Eng. 2003 Feb;125(1):12-24
references: 12661193
references: J Biomech. 2004 Feb;37(2):213-21
references: 14706324
references: Ann Biomed Eng. 2004 Jan;32(1):70-6
references: 14964723
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Apr 1;29(7):713-22
references: 15087791
references: Connect Tissue Res. 1981;9(1):1-10
references: 6456121
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1983 Sep;8(6):665-71
references: 6685921
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Feb;13(2):179-87
references: 3406838
references: J Biomech. 1988;21(5):425-33
references: 3417694
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Jun;15(6):567-70
references: 2402697
references: Radiology. 1993 Aug;188(2):351-4
references: 8327677
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Apr 15;19(8):935-40
references: 8009352
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Dec 1;29(23):2691-9
references: 15564918
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Dec 1;29(23):2700-9
references: 15564919
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Dec 1;29(23):2724-32
references: 15564921
references: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Dec 1;29(23):2733-41
references: 15564922
references: J Biomech. 2005 Oct;38(10):1972-83
references: 15936025
references: J Orthop Res. 2005 Sep;23(5):1120-7
references: 16140193
references: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Apr;88 Suppl 2:36-40
references: 16595441
references: J Biomech. 2006;39(8):1392-400
references: 15970200
references: Ann Biomed Eng. 2006 May;34(5):769-77
references: 16598654
references: Eur Spine J. 2006 Aug;15 Suppl 3:S361-71
references: 16724211
references: Ann Rheum Dis. 1996 Dec;55(12):880-7
references: 9014581