title: Guidelines in context of evidence.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  In clinical practice guidelines, the quality of the available evidence is graded according to its reliability and quality. This study aimed to evaluate the quality of the available research evidence, using the levels of evidence, in the evidence summaries of 64 Finnish national evidence-based Current Care guidelines.
  
  
  METHODS
  Descriptive assessment.
  
  
  METHODS
  Electronic web-based guidelines in Finland.
  
  
  METHODS
  The proportions of evidence summaries with different levels of evidence (A-D).
  
  
  RESULTS
  The 64 guidelines had a total of 2419 evidence summaries. Of these, 532 (22.0%) were evidence level A, 891 (36.8%) were evidence level B, 808 (33.4%) were evidence level C, and 188 (7.8%) were evidence level D. Most--that is, 81% of the level C and D evidence summaries dealt with diagnosis and treatment. Most of the evidence summaries pertained to treatment (58.2%) and diagnosis (22.4%). The sections on diagnosis and treatment represented 80% of all the level A and level B evidence, and 81% of all the level C and level D evidence.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  There is adequate high-quality evidence (level A) to support only a fifth of the main statements of the 64 guidelines. This is most likely an optimistic estimate, since level D evidence often does not have an evidence summary. The guideline development groups find it easier to agree on recommendations based on level A and level B evidence.
authors: Finnish Medical Society Duodecim, Helsinki, Finland. eeva.ketola@duodecim.fi
authors: Eeva
authors: E
authors: Ketola
authors: Minna
authors: M
authors: Kaila
authors: Mari
authors: M
authors: Honkanen
mesh_terms: D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine / Q000592:standards*; D005387:Finland; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet; D015201:Meta-Analysis as Topic; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic / Q000592:standards*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results
references: J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Aug;13(4):627-31
references: 17683306
references: Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Feb;12(1):18-23
references: 12571340
references: Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Aug;13(4):287-94
references: 15289632
references: BMJ. 1998 Sep 26;317(7162):858-61
references: 9748183
references: Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Dec;13(6):455-60
references: 15576708
references: BMC Health Serv Res. 2004 Dec 22;4(1):38
references: 15615589
references: J Adv Nurs. 2005 Mar;49(5):530-7
references: 15713185
references: Qual Saf Health Care. 2005 Oct;14(5):367-70
references: 16195572
references: Clin Chem. 2006 Jan;52(1):3-4
references: 16391326