Complete DNA sequences of the plastid genomes of two parasitic flowering plant species, Cuscuta reflexa and Cuscuta gronovii.
BACKGROUND
The holoparasitic plant genus Cuscuta comprises species with photosynthetic capacity and functional chloroplasts as well as achlorophyllous and intermediate forms with restricted photosynthetic activity and degenerated chloroplasts. Previous data indicated significant differences with respect to the plastid genome coding capacity in different Cuscuta species that could correlate with their photosynthetic activity. In order to shed light on the molecular changes accompanying the parasitic lifestyle, we sequenced the plastid chromosomes of the two species Cuscuta reflexa and Cuscuta gronovii. Both species are capable of performing photosynthesis, albeit with varying efficiencies. Together with the plastid genome of Epifagus virginiana, an achlorophyllous parasitic plant whose plastid genome has been sequenced, these species represent a series of progression towards total dependency on the host plant, ranging from reduced levels of photosynthesis in C. reflexa to a restricted photosynthetic activity and degenerated chloroplasts in C. gronovii to an achlorophyllous state in E. virginiana.


RESULTS
The newly sequenced plastid genomes of C. reflexa and C. gronovii reveal that the chromosome structures are generally very similar to that of non-parasitic plants, although a number of species-specific insertions, deletions (indels) and sequence inversions were identified. However, we observed a gradual adaptation of the plastid genome to the different degrees of parasitism. The changes are particularly evident in C. gronovii and include (a) the parallel losses of genes for the subunits of the plastid-encoded RNA polymerase and the corresponding promoters from the plastid genome, (b) the first documented loss of the gene for a putative splicing factor, MatK, from the plastid genome and (c) a significant reduction of RNA editing.


CONCLUSIONS
Overall, the comparative genomic analysis of plastid DNA from parasitic plants indicates a bias towards a simplification of the plastid gene expression machinery as a consequence of an increasing dependency on the host plant. A tentative assignment of the successive events in the adaptation of the plastid genomes to parasitism can be inferred from the current data set. This includes (1) a loss of non-coding regions in photosynthetic Cuscuta species that has resulted in a condensation of the plastid genome, (2) the simplification of plastid gene expression in species with largely impaired photosynthetic capacity and (3) the deletion of a significant part of the genetic information, including the information for the photosynthetic apparatus, in non-photosynthetic parasitic plants.
Funk
Helena T
HT
Department of Cell Biology, Philipps-University Marburg, Karl-von-Frisch-Str., D-35032 Marburg, Germany. helena.funk@staff.uni-marburg.de
Berg
Sabine
S
Krupinska
Karin
K
Maier
Uwe G
UG
Krause
Kirsten
K
D001483:Base Sequence; D002874:Chromosome Mapping; D034182:Cuscuta / Q000235:genetics*; D018742:DNA, Chloroplast / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics*; D018744:DNA, Plant / Q000737:chemistry / Q000235:genetics; D012321:DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases / Q000235:genetics; D023061:Gene Order; D017343:Genes, Plant / Q000235:genetics; D054627:Genome, Plastid / Q000235:genetics*; D007438:Introns / Q000235:genetics; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D010788:Photosynthesis / Q000235:genetics; D010940:Plant Proteins / Q000235:genetics; D017393:RNA Editing / Q000235:genetics; D012326:RNA Splicing / Q000235:genetics; D017422:Sequence Analysis, DNA
D018742:DNA, Chloroplast; D018744:DNA, Plant; D010940:Plant Proteins; D012321:DNA-Directed RNA Polymerases
EMBO J. 1991 Nov;10(11):3281-8
1915295
Planta. 2003 Nov;218(1):135-42
12898255
Trends Plant Sci. 2006 Feb;11(2):101-8
16406301
Plant Cell Physiol. 2004 Apr;45(4):357-68
15111710
Plant Cell. 1994 Oct;6(10):1455-65
7994178
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jun 10;94(12):6285-90
9177209
Plant Mol Biol. 1996 Jan;30(1):109-23
8616228
Genetics. 1998 Sep;150(1):425-33
9725858
Nucleic Acids Res. 1999 Oct 1;27(19):3866-74
10481026
J Exp Bot. 2001 Oct;52(363):2043-9
11559740
EMBO J. 1997 Jul 1;16(13):4041-8
9233813
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1;34(Database issue):D692-6
16381961
Plant Mol Biol. 1991 Jul;17(1):161-6
1651128
Curr Genet. 1992 Apr;21(4-5):417-22
1525868
J Biol Chem. 2007 Apr 6;282(14):10773-82
17283080
Nucleic Acids Res. 1995 Mar 25;23(6):917-21
7537369
J Exp Bot. 2005 Sep;56(419):2477-86
16061507
Plant Cell Physiol. 1993 Jun;34(4):577-84
8025824
Curr Genet. 1993 Jul-Aug;24(1-2):171-6
8358824
Curr Genet. 1991 Aug;20(3):259-64
1718612
Mol Gen Genet. 1992 Mar;232(1):154-61
1552899
J Mol Evol. 1992 Oct;35(4):304-17
1404416
Planta. 2004 Jul;219(3):541-6
15085431
Planta. 2003 Mar;216(5):815-23
12624769
Plant Physiol. 1994 Apr;104(4):1119-29
8016258
Plant Cell. 1997 Mar;9(3):283-96
9090875
Curr Genet. 1994 Sep;26(3):263-8
7859310
Planta. 2000 Apr;210(5):701-7
10805440
Plant Cell. 2005 Jun;17(6):1815-28
15894714
J Mol Evol. 2005 Sep;61(3):292-305
15999247
J Biol Chem. 2001 Feb 9;276(6):3937-40
11078738
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Nov 15;89(22):10648-52
1332054
EMBO J. 1986 Sep;5(9):2043-2049
16453699
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Oct 11;91(21):9794-8
7937893
Gene. 1989 Oct 15;82(1):5-30
2684776
EMBO J. 1997 Nov 17;16(22):6804-11
9362494
J Mol Biol. 1997 Jul 11;270(2):179-87
9236120
Int Rev Cytol. 2005;244:1-68
16157177
Plant Mol Biol. 1996 Oct;32(1-2):343-65
8980487
Plant Mol Biol. 1994 Jan;24(1):217-22
8111019
RNA Biol. 2004 Jul;1(2):84-8
17179745
Plant Mol Biol. 1990 May;14(5):805-14
2102858
EMBO J. 1994 Oct 3;13(19):4623-8
7925303
Plant Mol Biol. 1995 Nov;29(4):721-33
8541499
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000 Oct 29;355(1402):1351-9
11127990
Plant Mol Biol. 1997 Jan;33(1):79-86
9037161