title: Interval timing in genetically modified mice: a simple paradigm.
abstract: We describe a behavioral screen for the quantitative study of interval timing and interval memory in mice. Mice learn to switch from a short-latency feeding station to a long-latency station when the short latency has passed without a feeding. The psychometric function is the cumulative distribution of switch latencies. Its median measures timing accuracy and its interquartile interval measures timing precision. Next, using this behavioral paradigm, we have examined mice with a gene knockout of the receptor for gastrin-releasing peptide that show enhanced (i.e. prolonged) freezing in fear conditioning. We have tested the hypothesis that the mutants freeze longer because they are more uncertain than wild types about when to expect the electric shock. The knockouts however show normal accuracy and precision in timing, so we have rejected this alternative hypothesis. Last, we conduct the pharmacological validation of our behavioral screen using d-amphetamine and methamphetamine. We suggest including the analysis of interval timing and temporal memory in tests of genetically modified mice for learning and memory and argue that our paradigm allows this to be done simply and efficiently.
authors: Psychology Department and Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08854-8020, USA. fbalci@ruccs.rutgers.edu
authors: F
authors: F
authors: Balci
authors: E B
authors: EB
authors: Papachristos
authors: C R
authors: CR
authors: Gallistel
authors: D
authors: D
authors: Brunner
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Gibson
authors: G P
authors: GP
authors: Shumyatsky
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D005260:Female; D051379:Mice; D008810:Mice, Inbred C57BL; D018345:Mice, Knockout / Q000235:genetics*; D008957:Models, Genetic; D017440:Photoperiod; D011930:Reaction Time; D013998:Time Perception / Q000502:physiology*
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 May;85(3):293-308
references: 16776053
references: Behav Pharmacol. 2005 Jul;16(4):193-208
references: 15961959
references: Annu Rev Neurosci. 2000;23:155-84
references: 10845062
references: Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2001 Jan;68(1):147-55
references: 11274719
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 2002 Sep;78(2):195-214
references: 12216978
references: Cell. 2002 Dec 13;111(6):905-18
references: 12526815
references: Behav Neurosci. 2003 Aug;117(4):774-84
references: 12931962
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2004 Jan;30(1):3-16
references: 14709111
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Sep 7;101(36):13124-31
references: 15331782
references: Psychopharmacologia. 1974 May 15;36(4):313-22
references: 4847385
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1977 Jul;3(3):216-28
references: 881613
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1981 Jan;7(1):18-30
references: 7229573
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1983 Apr;9(2):160-70
references: 6842135
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1983 Apr;9(2):171-201
references: 6842136
references: Psychol Rev. 1988 Apr;95(2):274-95
references: 3375401
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1989 Oct;15(4):295-310
references: 2794867
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1995 Jan;21(1):43-63
references: 7844506
references: Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1995 Jun-Jul;51(2-3):165-73
references: 7667325
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1997 Jul;23(3):312-24
references: 9206026
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Oct;11(5):791-806
references: 15732688
references: Psychol Rev. 2000 Apr;107(2):289-344
references: 10789198