Influence of magnetic resonance of the knee on GPs' decisions: a randomised trial.
BACKGROUND
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the knee for meniscus and ligament injuries is an accurate diagnostic test. Early and accurate diagnosis of patients with knee problems may prevent the onset of chronic problems such as osteoarthritis, a common cause of disability in older people consulting their GP.


OBJECTIVE
To assess the effect of early access to MRI, compared with referral to an orthopaedic specialist, on GPs' diagnoses and treatment plans for patients with knee problems.


METHODS
A multi-centre, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial.


METHODS
Five hundred and fifty-three patients with knee problems were recruited from 163 general practices across the UK from November 2002 to October 2004.


METHODS
Eligible patients were randomised to MRI or consultation with an orthopaedic specialist. GPs made a concomitant provisional referral to orthopaedics for patients who were allocated to imaging. GPs recorded patients' diagnoses, treatment plans, and their confidence in these decisions at trial entry and follow-up. Data were analysed as intention to treat.


RESULTS
There was no significant difference between MRI and orthopaedic groups for changes in diagnosis (P = 0.79) or treatment plans (P = 0.059). Significant changes in diagnostic and therapeutic confidence were observed for both groups with a greater increase in diagnostic confidence (P<0.001) and therapeutic confidence (P = 0.002) in the MRI group. There was a significant increase in within-group changes in diagnostic and therapeutic confidence.


CONCLUSIONS
Access to MRI did not significantly alter GPs' diagnoses or treatment plans compared with direct referral to an orthopaedic specialist, but access to MRI significantly increased their confidence in these decisions.
Brealey
Stephen D
SD
Department of Health Sciences, York Trials Unit, Seebohm Rowntree Building, University of York, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD. sb143@york.ac.uk
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003657:Decision Making; D005194:Family Practice; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007718:Knee Injuries / Q000175:diagnosis*; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000473:pathology; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008592:Menisci, Tibial / Q000473:pathology; D008875:Middle Aged; D011364:Professional Practice; D012017:Referral and Consultation
Radiology. 1997 Aug;204(2):447-54
9240534
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Oct 7;139(7):575-88
14530229
Clin Radiol. 2000 Nov;55(11):825-31
11069736
Radiology. 2001 Aug;220(2):393-9
11477242
Br J Radiol. 1987 Nov;60(719):1071-81
3318997
BMJ. 1995 Dec 16;311(7020):1614
8555806
Surg Radiol Anat. 1994;16(2):183-92
7940083
Br J Gen Pract. 1997 Sep;47(422):575-6
9406494
JAMA. 1977 Jul 18;238(3):224-7
406427
Clin Radiol. 1998 Jan;53(1):58-60
9464438
BMJ. 1996 Mar 30;312(7034):849-50
8608317
BMJ. 2001 Feb 17;322(7283):400-5
11179160
Clin Radiol. 1996 Apr;51(4):245-50
8617035
Health Policy. 2000 Sep;53(2):91-104
10958991
World J Surg. 1997 May;21(4):363-8
9143565
Med Decis Making. 1991 Apr-Jun;11(2):88-94
1907710
N Engl J Med. 1994 Jul 14;331(2):115-6
8208253
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct 13;6:133
17040558
Radiology. 2003 Mar;226(3):837-48
12601211
Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Feb;60(2):91-7
11156538
Clin Radiol. 1995 Aug;50(8):513-8
7656516
Radiology. 1997 Sep;204(3):799-805
9280263
Clin Radiol. 1997 May;52(5):363-8
9171790