title: Effect of discriminative plant-sugar feeding on the survival and fecundity of Anopheles gambiae.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  A previous study showed for Anopheles gambiae s.s. a gradation of feeding preference on common plant species growing in a malaria holoendemic area in western Kenya. The present follow-up study determines whether there is a relationship between the mosquito's preferences and its survival and fecundity.
  
  
  METHODS
  Groups of mosquitoes were separately given ad libitum opportunity to feed on five of the more preferred plant species (Hamelia patens, Parthenium hysterophorus, Ricinus communis, Senna didymobotrya, and Tecoma stans) and one of the less preferred species (Lantana camara). The mosquitoes were monitored daily for survival. Sugar solution (glucose 6%) and water were used as controls. In addition, the fecundity of mosquitoes on each plant after (i) only one blood meal (number of eggs oviposited), and (ii) after three consecutive blood meals (proportion of females ovipositing, number of eggs oviposited and hatchability of eggs), was determined. The composition and concentration of sugar in the fed-on parts of each plant species were determined using gas chromatography. Using SAS statistical package, tests for significant difference of the fitness values between mosquitoes exposed to different plant species were conducted.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Anopheles gambiae that had fed on four of the five more preferred plant species (T. stans, S. didymobotrya, R. communis and H. patens, but not P. hysterophorus) lived longer and laid more eggs after one blood meal, when compared with An. gambiae that had fed on the least preferred plant species L. camara. When given three consecutive blood-meals, the percentage of females that oviposited, but not the number of eggs laid, was significantly higher for mosquitoes that had previously fed on the four more preferred plant species. Total sugar concentration in the preferred plant parts was significantly correlated with survival and with the proportion of females that laid eggs. This effect was associated mainly with three sugar types, namely glucose, fructose, and gulose. Except for P. hysterophorus, the results suggest that feeding by mosquitoes on preferred plant species under natural conditions results in higher fitness-related benefits, and that the sugar content in preferred plant parts is largely responsible for these effects.
authors: International Centre of Insect Physiology and Ecology (ICIPE), PO Box 30772, Nairobi, Kenya. hmanda@mbita.mimcom.net
authors: Hortance
authors: H
authors: Manda
authors: Louis C
authors: LC
authors: Gouagna
authors: Woodbridge A
authors: WA
authors: Foster
authors: Robert R
authors: RR
authors: Jackson
authors: John C
authors: JC
authors: Beier
authors: John I
authors: JI
authors: Githure
authors: Ahmed
authors: A
authors: Hassanali
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D000852:Anopheles / Q000502:physiology*; D002241:Carbohydrates / Q000032:analysis / Q000302:isolation & purification; D002849:Chromatography, Gas; D005247:Feeding Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D005298:Fertility; D005518:Food Preferences / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D010936:Plant Extracts / Q000032:analysis; D010944:Plants / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism
chemical_list: D002241:Carbohydrates; D010936:Plant Extracts
references: J Med Entomol. 1995 Nov;32(6):882-7
references: 8551514
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1997 Aug;57(2):235-9
references: 9288822
references: J Med Entomol. 1993 Nov;30(6):975-85
references: 8271256
references: J Med Entomol. 1996 Jul;33(4):608-12
references: 8699455
references: Annu Rev Entomol. 1995;40:443-74
references: 7810991
references: Annu Rev Entomol. 1995;40:195-219
references: 7810986
references: Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1974;68(4):278-301
references: 4420769
references: J Med Entomol. 2001 Jan;38(1):22-8
references: 11268686
references: Med Vet Entomol. 2004 Jun;18(2):108-15
references: 15189235
references: Med Vet Entomol. 2005 Dec;19(4):413-22
references: 16336306
references: East Afr Med J. 1998 Jan;75(1):11-5
references: 9604528
references: J Med Entomol. 1998 Sep;35(5):809-13
references: 9775613
references: Med Vet Entomol. 2004 Jun;18(2):102-7
references: 15189234
references: J Med Entomol. 2003 Sep;40(5):657-63
references: 14596279
references: Med Vet Entomol. 2007 Mar;21(1):103-11
references: 17373953
references: J Insect Physiol. 1971 Dec;17(12):2475-9
references: 5158369
references: J Insect Physiol. 1971 Nov;17(11):2221-33
references: 5158362
references: Parasitology. 2004 Mar;128(Pt 3):235-43
references: 15074873
references: Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1999 Dec;61(6):1010-6
references: 10674687
references: Med Vet Entomol. 2000 Mar;14(1):64-70
references: 10759314
references: Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 1991 Jan-Mar;86(1):57-66
references: 1842402