Simon says: reliability and the role of working memory and attentional control in the simon task.
The Simon effect refers to the observation that subjects identify targets (e.g., colors) faster when the irrelevant spatial location of the target corresponds to the location of the response key. Theoretical accounts of the Simon effect typically explain performance in terms of automatic and controlled processes. Furthermore, the relative contributions of automatic and controlled processes are held to change as a function of the proportion of compatible to incompatible trials (compatibility proportion). Data are presented demonstrating that the reliability of the Simon effect, indexed by correlating its magnitude within subjects across blocks of trials, varied substantially as a function of the compatibility proportion. When the compatibility proportion was high, so was reliability. When the compatibility proportion was low, reliability was low as well. The results are discussed in terms of the relative reliability of automatic and controlled processes and the role of working memory and attentional control in goal maintenance.
Borgmann
Karl W U
KW
University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. kwuborgm@uwaterloo.ca
Risko
Evan E
EE
Stolz
Jennifer A
JA
Besner
Derek
D
D001288:Attention; D006040:Goals; D006801:Humans; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D011582:Psychological Theory; D011584:Psychology / Q000379:methods; D011930:Reaction Time; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012927:Social Control, Informal
Psychol Res. 1994;56(4):261-8
8090861
Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Jun;2(2):174-207
24203654
Psychol Rev. 1990 Apr;97(2):253-70
2186425
Cogn Psychol. 2000 May;40(3):227-59
10790324
Psychol Aging. 1993 Dec;8(4):490-507
8292278
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2003 Mar;132(1):47-70
12656297
Psychol Res. 1994;56(3):179-84
8008780
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 1997 Sep;52(5):P216-28
9310090
Conscious Cogn. 1995 Dec;4(4):483-501
8750420
Psychol Bull. 1999 Nov;125(6):777-99
10589302