Wrinkly-Spreader fitness in the two-dimensional agar plate microcosm: maladaptation, compensation and ecological success.
Bacterial adaptation to new environments often leads to the establishment of new genotypes with significantly altered phenotypes. In the Wrinkly Spreader (WS), ecological success in static liquid microcosms was through the rapid colonisation of the air-liquid interface by the production of a cellulose-based biofilm. Rapid surface spreading was also seen on agar plates, but in this two-dimensional environment the WS appears maladapted and rapidly reverts to the ancestral smooth (SM)-like colony genotype. In this work, the fitness of WS relative to SM in mixed colonies was found to be low, confirming the WS instability on agar plates. By examining defined WS mutants, the maladaptive characteristic was found to be the expression of cellulose. SM-like revertants had a higher growth rate than WS and no longer expressed significant amounts of cellulose, further confirming that the expression of this high-cost polymer was the basis of maladaptation and the target of compensatory mutation in developing colonies. However, examination of the fate of WS-founded populations in either multiple-colony or single mega-colony agar plate microcosms demonstrated that the loss of WS lineages could be reduced under conditions in which the rapid spreading colony phenotype could dominate nutrient and oxygen access more effectively than competing SM/SM-like genotypes. WS-like isolates recovered from such populations showed increased WS phenotype stability as well as changes in the degree of colony spreading, confirming that the WS was adapting to the two-dimensional agar plate microcosm.
Spiers
Andrew J
AJ
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. a.spiers@abertay.ac.uk
D000220:Adaptation, Biological / Q000502:physiology*; D000362:Agar / Q000737:chemistry; D018441:Biofilms / Q000254:growth & development; D005075:Biological Evolution; D018929:Cell Culture Techniques; D004463:Ecology; D004777:Environment; D056084:Genetic Fitness; D005838:Genotype; D008957:Models, Genetic; D010641:Phenotype; D011551:Pseudomonas fluorescens / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology
D000362:Agar
Mol Ecol. 1995 Dec;4(6):755-63
8564013
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 May 25;101(21):8072-7
15150419
Nature. 1998 Jul 2;394(6688):69-72
9665128
J Bacteriol. 2002 Dec;184(23):6481-9
12426335
Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Jun;15(6):243-247
10802550
Bioessays. 1995 Jul;17(7):597-607
7646482
Microbiology. 2005 Sep;151(Pt 9):2829-39
16151196
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Sep 13;91(19):9037-41
8090765
Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci. 2003 Jun 15;361(1807):1283-312
12816612
Genetics. 2002 May;161(1):33-46
12019221
Microbiology. 2004 Aug;150(Pt 8):2497-502
15289546
Arch Microbiol. 1999 Jul;172(1):59-62
10398753
Environ Microbiol. 2006 Nov;8(11):1997-2011
17014498
Nat Rev Genet. 2003 Jun;4(6):457-69
12776215
J Gen Microbiol. 1991 Dec;137(12):2885-9
1791442
Genetics. 2007 May;176(1):441-53
17339222
Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004 Apr;7(2):185-91
15063857
Genetics. 2006 Jun;173(2):515-26
16624907
J Lab Clin Med. 1954 Aug;44(2):301-7
13184240
Trends Microbiol. 2005 Feb;13(2):58-63
15680764
Mol Microbiol. 2003 Oct;50(1):15-27
14507360
Mol Microbiol. 1996 Feb;19(3):521-33
8830243
Science. 1978 Mar 24;199(4335):1302-10
17840770
Nat Genet. 2006 Sep;38(9):1015-22
16921374
Annu Rev Microbiol. 1998;52:81-104
9891794
J Gen Microbiol. 1983 Apr;129(4):1239-42
6411858