title: Value and limitations of contrast-enhanced MR angiography in spinal arteriovenous malformations and dural arteriovenous fistulas.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The purpose of this work was to study the validity of MR angiography (MRA) for identification of spinal arteriovenous (AV) abnormalities.
  
  
  METHODS
  Thirty-four consecutive patients with suspicion of spinal vascular abnormalities underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) after MRA. The level and side of the suspected spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (SDAVF) and the feeding arteries in spinal arteriovenous malformations (SAVMs) were determined from the MRA and compared with DSA.
  
  
  RESULTS
  DSA revealed SDAVF in 20 abnormalities of which 19 were spinal and 1 was tentorial with spinal drainage, as well as SAVM in 11 patients. In 3 patients, MRA and DSA were both normal. For detection of spinal arteriovenous abnormalities, neither false-positive nor false-negative MRA results were obtained. The MRA-derived level of the feeding artery in SDAVF agreed with DSA in 14 of 19 cases. In 5 cases, a mismatch of 1 vertebral level (not side) was noted for the feeding artery. For the tentorial AVF, only the spinal drainage was depicted; the feeding artery was outside the MRA field of view. In intradural SAVM, the main feeding artery was identified by MRA in 10 of 11 patients. MRA could differentiate between glomerular and fistulous SAVM in 4 of 6 cases and between sacral SDAVF and filum terminale SAVM in 2 of 5 cases.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  MRA reliably detects or excludes various types of spinal AV abnormalities and localizes the (predominant) arterial feeder of most spinal AV shunts. Although classification of the subtype of SAVMs remains difficult, with MRA it greatly helps to focus subsequent DSA.
authors: Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Mull
authors: R J
authors: RJ
authors: Nijenhuis
authors: W H
authors: WH
authors: Backes
authors: T
authors: T
authors: Krings
authors: J T
authors: JT
authors: Wilmink
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Thron
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001165:Arteriovenous Malformations / Q000175:diagnosis*; D020785:Central Nervous System Vascular Malformations / Q000175:diagnosis*; D003287:Contrast Media; D005260:Female; D019786:Gadolinium DTPA; D006801:Humans; D007089:Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods*; D018810:Magnetic Resonance Angiography / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013116:Spinal Cord / Q000002:abnormalities* / Q000098:blood supply* / Q000473:pathology
chemical_list: D003287:Contrast Media; D019786:Gadolinium DTPA
references: Radiology. 2004 Nov;233(2):541-7
references: 15358852
references: Radiology. 1988 Nov;169(2):479-84
references: 3174997
references: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005 Jul;22(1):136-44
references: 15971172
references: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006 Aug;27(7):1565-72
references: 16908582
references: Eur Radiol. 2005 Feb;15(2):267-78
references: 15538580
references: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997 Feb;18(2):351-8
references: 9111675
references: Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Dec;14(6):444-60
references: 14872165
references: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999 Nov-Dec;20(10):1785-93
references: 10588098
references: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1995 Nov-Dec;16(10):2029-43
references: 8585491
references: Radiology. 2002 Mar;222(3):843-50
references: 11867811
references: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005 Apr;26(4):711-8
references: 15814910