The GRAIDS Trial: a cluster randomised controlled trial of computer decision support for the management of familial cancer risk in primary care.
The objective was to evaluate the effect of an assessment strategy using the computer decision support system (the GRAIDS software), on the management of familial cancer risk in British general practice in comparison with best current practice. The design included cluster randomised controlled trial, and involved forty-five general practice teams in East Anglia, UK. Randomised to GRAIDS (Genetic Risk Assessment on the Internet with Decision Support) support (intervention n=23) or comparison (n=22). Training in the new assessment strategy and access to the GRAIDS software (GRAIDS arm) was conducted, compared with an educational session and guidelines about managing familial breast and colorectal cancer risk (comparison) were mailed. Outcomes were measured at practice, practitioner and patient levels. The primary outcome measure, at practice level, was the proportion of referrals made to the Regional Genetics Clinic for familial breast or colorectal cancer that were consistent with referral guidelines. Other measures included practitioner confidence in managing familial cancer (GRAIDS arm only) and, in patients: cancer worry, risk perception and knowledge about familial cancer. There were more referrals to the Regional Genetics Clinic from GRAIDS than comparison practices (mean 6.2 and 3.2 referrals per 10 000 registered patients per year; mean difference 3.0 referrals; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2-4.8; P=0.001); referrals from GRAIDS practices were more likely to be consistent with referral guidelines (odds ratio (OR)=5.2; 95% CI 1.7-15.8, P=0.006). Patients referred from GRAIDS practices had lower cancer worry scores at the point of referral (mean difference -1.44 95% CI -2.64 to -0.23, P=0.02). There were no differences in patient knowledge about familial cancer. The intervention increased GPs' confidence in managing familial cancer. Compared with education and mailed guidelines, assessment including computer decision support increased the number and quality of referrals to the Regional Genetics Clinic for familial cancer risk, improved practitioner confidence and had no adverse psychological effects in patients. Trials are registered under N0181144343 in the UK National Research Register.
Emery
J
J
General Practice, School of Primary, Aboriginal and Rural Health Care, University of Western Australia, 328 Stirling Highway, Claremont, Western Australia 6010, Australia. jon.emery@uwa.edu.au
Morris
H
H
Goodchild
R
R
Fanshawe
T
T
Prevost
A T
AT
Bobrow
M
M
Kinmonth
A L
AL
D000328:Adult; D000465:Algorithms; D016000:Cluster Analysis; D003658:Decision Making, Computer-Assisted; D020000:Decision Support Systems, Clinical / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D004739:England; D005194:Family Practice / Q000379:methods*; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000235:genetics* / Q000628:therapy*; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000379:methods*; D018570:Risk Assessment
BMJ. 2000 Mar 11;320(7236):686-90
10710578
BMJ. 2005 Nov 5;331(7524):1047
16243849
Lancet. 2000 Jun 10;355(9220):2015-20
10885351
BMJ. 2000 Sep 16;321(7262):694-6
10987780
BMJ. 2001 Feb 3;322(7281):279-82
11157532
Genet Med. 1998 Nov-Dec;1(1):13-21
11261424
Lancet. 2001 Jul 7;358(9275):56-63
11454400
Br J Cancer. 2001 Jul 20;85(2):166-70
11461071
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Oct;51(471):817-21
11677705
BMJ. 2002 Apr 13;324(7342):880-2
11950738
J Med Genet. 2002 Oct;39(10):779-81
12362040
Fam Pract. 2002 Dec;19(6):587-90
12429659
Lancet. 2003 Jan 25;361(9354):296-300
12559863
Am J Prev Med. 2003 Feb;24(2):128-35
12568818
Am J Prev Med. 2003 Feb;24(2):190-8
12568826
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 5;348(23):2339-47
12788999
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Jan 21;96(2):122-33
14734702
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Feb 18;96(4):261-8
14970275
Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Oct;5(10):783-90
15510169
Am J Hum Genet. 1991 Feb;48(2):232-42
1990835
Br J Cancer. 1999 Feb;79(5-6):868-74
10070883
BMJ. 1999 Jul 3;319(7201):32-6
10390458
Health Technol Assess. 2005 Feb;9(3):iii-iv, 1-126
15694064
BMJ. 2005 Apr 2;330(7494):765
15767266
Lancet. 2005 May 21-27;365(9473):1769-78
15910949
Ann Hum Biol. 2005 Mar-Apr;32(2):218-27
16096220
BMJ. 2000 Jul 1;321(7252):28-32
10875832