Laparoscopic versus open liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis: short- and middle-term results.
BACKGROUND
Liver surgery, especially for cirrhotic patients, is one of the last areas of resistance to progress in laparoscopic surgery. This study compares the postoperative results and the 2-year patient outcomes between laparoscopic and open resection for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with histologically proven cirrhosis.


METHODS
From May 2000 to October 2004, 23 consecutive cirrhotic patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) for HCC were compared in a retrospective analysis with a historic group of 23 patients who underwent open hepatectomy (OH). The two groups were well matched for age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) class, tumor location and size, type of liver resection, and severity of cirrhosis. The selection criteria for both groups specified a small (size < 5 cm), exophytic, or subcapsular tumor located in the left or peripheral right segments of the liver (II-VI segments, Couinaud); a well-compensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A); and an ASA score lower than 3. In the LH group, 15 subsegmentectomies, 3 segmentectomies, and 5 left lateral sectionectomies were performed, as compared with 12 subsegmentectomies, 5 segmentectomies, and 6 left lateral sectionectomies in the OH group.


RESULTS
One patient in the LH group (4.3%) underwent conversion to laparotomy for inadequate exposition. The mean operative time was statistically longer for the LH group (LH, 148 min; OH, 125 min; p = 0.016), whereas blood transfusions (LH, 0%; OH, 17.3%; p = 0.036), Pringle maneuver (LH, 0%; OH, 21.73%; p = 0.017), mean hospital stay (LH, 8.3 days; OH, 12 days; p = 0.047), and postoperative complications (LH, 13%; OH, 47.8%; p = 0.010) were significantly greater in OH group. There was no statistically significant difference in mortality and 2-year survival rates between the two groups.


CONCLUSIONS
This study shows that LH for HCC in properly selected cirrhotic patients results in fewer early postoperative complications and a shorter hospital stay than the traditional OH. The 2-year survival rate was the same for LH and OH.
Belli
G
G
Department of General and Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, S. M. Loreto Nuovo Hospital, Via A. Vespucci, 80142, Via Cimarosa 2/A, 80127, Naples, Italy. chirurgia.loretonuovo@tin.it
Fantini
C
C
D'Agostino
A
A
Cioffi
L
L
Langella
S
S
Russolillo
N
N
Belli
A
A
D000368:Aged; D006528:Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / Q000150:complications* / Q000601:surgery*; D013505:Digestive System Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D008103:Liver Cirrhosis / Q000150:complications* / Q000175:diagnosis; D008113:Liver Neoplasms / Q000150:complications* / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D016896:Treatment Outcome
Surg Endosc. 1996 Jul;10(7):758-61
8662435
Ann Surg. 2002 Jan;235(1):27-30
11753039
Am J Surg. 2005 Feb;189(2):190-4
15720988
Ann Surg. 2000 Apr;231(4):544-51
10749616
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005;12(6):438-43
16365815
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13
15273542
Ann Surg. 1998 Apr;227(4):527-32
9563541
Ann Surg. 2000 Dec;232(6):753-62
11088070
J Am Coll Surg. 2003 Feb;196(2):236-42
12595052
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2005;12(6):488-93
16365825
Surg Endosc. 2005 Jul;19(7):886-91
15920694
Ann Surg. 2001 Jul;234(1):71-8
11420485
Br J Surg. 2006 Jan;93(1):67-72
16273531
Hepatogastroenterology. 1998 Nov-Dec;45(24):2333-8
9951918
Arch Surg. 2003 Jul;138(7):763-9; discussion 769
12860758
Surg Endosc. 2003 Jan;17(1):23-30
12364994
Ann Surg. 2006 Apr;243(4):499-506
16552201
Ann Surg. 2002 Jul;236(1):90-7
12131090
Surg Endosc. 2003 Dec;17(12):1914-8
14574547
Hepatogastroenterology. 1998 Jan-Feb;45(19):29-33
9496482
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006;13(2):149-54
16547677
Surg Endosc. 2001 Jun;15(6):541-4
11591936
Surgery. 2002 Mar;131(3):311-7
11894036
Chir Ital. 2005 Jan-Feb;57(1):15-25
15832734
Surg Endosc. 1998 Apr;12(4):331-4
9543523
Ann Surg. 2002 Mar;235(3):373-82
11882759
Br J Surg. 2007 Jan;94(1):58-63
17054316
Surg Endosc. 2007 Feb;21(2):181-8
17122984