Day case emergency laparoscopic appendectomy.
BACKGROUND
Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is associated with a shorter hospital stay and fewer complications than conventional open appendectomy (OA). This study aimed to examine the safety and efficacy of day case emergency LA.


METHODS
The records of patients undergoing emergency LA under the care of two laparoscopic surgeons over a 3-year period (Februrary 2003 to February 2006) were reviewed to examine hospital length of stay (LOS), complications, histology, grade of the operating surgeon, and time required to perform the procedure.


RESULTS
A total of 104 patients (median age, 25 years; range, 11-72 years; 58 men) underwent LA, with 9 and 66 patients discharged in 8 and 24 hours, respectively (median LOS 22 hours: range 6-170 hours). One patient underwent conversion to OA. Histologically, 86 patients had appendicitis and 18 had normal appendices with another pathology present. The median operative time was 35 min (range, 20-80 min). The complications included three wound infections and two pelvic abscesses not requiring further operative intervention.


CONCLUSIONS
Day case emergency LA is safe and effective for treating selected patients.
Gilliam
A D
AD
North Tyneside Hospital, Rake Lane, North Shields, Tyne and Wear, NE29 8NH, UK. andrewgilliam@btinternet.com
Anand
R
R
Horgan
L F
LF
Attwood
S E
SE
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000556:Ambulatory Surgical Procedures; D001062:Appendectomy / Q000379:methods*; D001064:Appendicitis / Q000601:surgery*; D002648:Child; D004638:Emergency Treatment; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;(1):CD001546
11869603
Br J Surg. 2003 Dec;90(12):1586-92
14648740
Dig Surg. 2002;19(6):518-22
12499748
Surg Endosc. 2006 Mar;20(3):495-9
16437274
Can J Surg. 1999 Oct;42(5):377-83
10526524
Surg Endosc. 2005 Jul;19(7):923-6
15920693
Surgery. 1992 Sep;112(3):497-501
1387739
Rev Gastroenterol Mex. 1997 Oct-Dec;62(4):254-9
9528295
Am Surg. 2005 Jan;71(1):1-4; discussion 4-5
15757049
Surg Endosc. 2006 May;20(5):717-20
16544077
J Am Coll Surg. 1998 May;186(5):545-53
9583695