title: In vitro evaluation of coronary stents and in-stent stenosis using a dynamic cardiac phantom and a 64-detector row CT scanner.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The aim of the study was to examine the ability of a 64-slice MDCT to detect in-stent stenoses in an ex vivo model of coronary stents.
  
  
  METHODS
  Five different stents (Liberté, Boston Scientific; Driver, Medtronic; Multi-Link Vision, Guidant; Taxus Express, Boston Scientific; Cypher, Cordis) were examined using a dynamic cardiac phantom. The stents were pulled over a vessel model that consists of a polymer tube with diameters of 3.0, 3.5, and 4.0 mm and four different degrees of stenoses (0%; 30%; 50%; 70-80%). This model was moved with a rate of 60 bpm to mimic cardiac motion. To assess the degree of artificial signal reduction (artificial reduction of attenuation (ARA)) by the different stents, attenuation values were measured in the vessel outside the stent, and in the non-stenotic vessel inside the stent. Furthermore the grade of stenosis was assessed by two clinical observers.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Highest ARA was found for the Cypher Stent (35 HU), whereas the Liberté Stent presented the lowest ARA (16 HU). Depending on the stent and the vessel diameter, up to 87.5% of the stenoses were correctly diagnosed. In the 3.0 and 3.5 mm vessels, a nonstenotic or low-grade stenotic vessel was diagnosed as intermediate or high-grade stenosis in 22.5%, whereas in the 4.0 mm vessels, this kind of overestimation did not occur. A 50% stenosis was diagnosed as a 30% stenosis in 30%. On the other hand, high-grade stenoses were underestimated in only 10%. On a four-point scale, the average deviation from the real grade of stenosis was 0.21 for the Liberté stent, 0.54 for the Taxus Express stent, 0.29 for Driver stent, 0.62 for the Multi-Link Vision stent, and 0.37 for the Cypher stent.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In a dynamic cardiac phantom model, high grade stenoses in vessels with a diameter of 4 mm could be reliably detected irrespective of the stent type used in this study. Vice versa, high grade stenoses (> or = 50%) could only be ruled out with certainty in vessels with a diameter of 4 mm. In smaller vessels, the ability to correctly diagnose high-grade stenoses was dependent on the type of stent and the imaging artifacts associated with it.
authors: Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122, Essen, Germany. thomas.schlosser@uni-duisburg-essen.de
authors: T
authors: T
authors: Schlosser
authors: T
authors: T
authors: Scheuermann
authors: S
authors: S
authors: Ulzheimer
authors: O K
authors: OK
authors: Mohrs
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Kühling
authors: P E
authors: PE
authors: Albrecht
authors: T
authors: T
authors: Voigtländer
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Barkhausen
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Schmermund
mesh_terms: D016477:Artifacts; D003327:Coronary Disease / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000628:therapy; D006083:Graft Occlusion, Vascular / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D006801:Humans; D066298:In Vitro Techniques; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D011857:Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; D015607:Stents; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods*
references: Eur Radiol. 2005 Apr;15(4):721-6
references: 15711845
references: Clin Res Cardiol. 2007 May;96(5):279-84
references: 17323010
references: Radiol Med. 2005 May-Jun;109(5-6):500-7
references: 15973223
references: Radiology. 2007 Feb;242(2):403-9
references: 17255411
references: Clin Res Cardiol. 2006 Sep;95(9):455-60
references: 16799877
references: Circulation. 2006 Aug 15;114(7):645-53
references: 16894038
references: Invest Radiol. 2006 Jan;41(1):22-7
references: 16355036
references: Eur Radiol. 2006 Apr;16(4):818-26
references: 16333623
references: Int J Cardiol. 2006 May 10;109 (2):188-94
references: 16019087
references: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Apr;37(5):1430-5
references: 11300457
references: N Engl J Med. 1998 Dec 3;339(23):1702-4
references: 9834311
references: Acta Radiol. 2006 Feb;47(1):36-42
references: 16498931
references: Int J Cardiol. 2003 Jun;89(2-3):167-72
references: 12767539
references: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 1999 Sep;48(1):39-47
references: 10467069
references: Clin Res Cardiol. 2006 Oct;95(10 ):560-4
references: 16897146
references: Invest Radiol. 2004 Jan;39(1):27-33
references: 14701986
references: Clin Res Cardiol. 2006 Apr;95(4):195-203
references: 16598587
references: Radiology. 2000 Feb;214(2):447-52
references: 10671593
references: Clin Res Cardiol. 2006 Nov;95(11):605-9
references: 16897140
references: Invest Radiol. 2003 Dec;38(12 ):790-5
references: 14627897
references: Eur Radiol. 2003 Mar;13(3):484-97
references: 12594550
references: Acad Radiol. 1998 Dec;5(12 ):858-62
references: 9862004
references: Eur Heart J. 2006 Nov;27(21):2567-72
references: 17035252
references: Radiology. 2004 Oct;233(1):286-91
references: 15304660