title: Cultural mosaics and mental models of nature.
abstract: For much of their history, the relationship between anthropology and psychology has been well captured by Robert Frost's poem, "Mending Wall," which ends with the ironic line, "good fences make good neighbors." The congenial fence was that anthropology studied what people think and psychology studied how people think. Recent research, however, shows that content and process cannot be neatly segregated, because cultural differences in what people think affect how people think. To achieve a deeper understanding of the relation between process and content, research must integrate the methodological insights from both anthropology and psychology. We review previous research and describe new studies in the domain of folk biology which examine the cognitive consequences of different conceptualizations of nature and the place of humans within it. The focus is on cultural differences in framework theories (epistemological orientations) among Native Americans (Menominee) and European American children and adults living in close proximity in rural Wisconsin. Our results show that epistemological orientations affect memory organization, ecological reasoning, and the perceived role of humans in nature. This research also demonstrates that cultural differences in framework theories have implications for understanding intergroup conflict over natural resources and are relevant to efforts to improve science learning, especially among Native American children.
authors: TERC, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA.
authors: Megan
authors: M
authors: Bang
authors: Douglas L
authors: DL
authors: Medin
authors: Scott
authors: S
authors: Atran
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000818:Animals; D002648:Child; D003071:Cognition; D003469:Culture; D005399:Fishes; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning; D008568:Memory; D008960:Models, Psychological
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2006 Nov;135(4):609-22
references: 17087576
references: Am Psychol. 2000 Jul;55(7):709-20
references: 10916861
references: Psychol Rev. 2001 Apr;108(2):291-310
references: 11381831
references: Psychol Rev. 2003 Jul;110(3):403-21
references: 12885109
references: Psychol Rev. 2004 Oct;111(4):960-83
references: 15482069
references: Child Dev. 1995 Dec;66(6):1856-74
references: 8556904
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jun 22;96(13):7598-603
references: 10377461
references: Cognition. 2006 Apr;99(3):237-73
references: 16055109