The costs and benefits of resource sharing: reciprocity requires resource heterogeneity.
The evolution of resource sharing requires that the fitness benefits to the recipients be much higher than the costs to the giver, which requires heterogeneity among individuals in the fitness value of acquiring additional resources. We develop four models of the evolution of resource sharing by either direct or indirect reciprocity, with equal or unequal partners. Evolution of resource sharing by reciprocity requires differences between interacting individuals in the fitness value of the resource, and these differences must reverse although previous acts of giving are remembered and both participants survive. Moreover, inequality in the expected reproductive value of the interacting individuals makes reciprocity more difficult to evolve, but may still allow evolution of sharing by kin selection. These constraints suggest that resource sharing should evolve much more frequently by kin selection than by reciprocity, a prediction that is well supported by observations in the natural world.
Whitlock
M C
MC
Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada. whitlock@zoology.ubc.ca
Davis
B H
BH
Yeaman
S
S
D000533:Altruism; D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D005075:Biological Evolution; D008962:Models, Theoretical