title: Pigeons' memory for sequences of light flashes when gap duration is an unreliable discriminative cue.
abstract: In Experiment 1, pigeons were trained with a 1-sec dark and a 1-sec houselight-illuminated delay interval to discriminate between sequences of two and four flashes of light (feeder illumination). The sequences could be discriminated on the basis of the number of flashes, the number of gaps, or the duration of the gap between flashes. A choose-few bias was obtained at extended dark delays, but not at extended illuminated delays. Pigeons appeared to confuse long dark delays with the longer gap between flashes on few-sample trials. In Experiment 2, additional sample sequences were included that made gap duration an unreliable cue for discriminating between the few and many samples. A significant choose-many bias was obtained at extended dark delay intervals, but no biased forgetting was found at extended illuminated delays. The pigeons appeared to discriminate light flash sequences by relying on multiple temporal features of a sequence rather than using an event switch to count flashes. The biased-forgetting effects observed appear to be due to instructional ambiguity that results from the similarity of the delay interval to features of the flash sequences.
authors: Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
authors: Dwayne
authors: D
authors: Keough
authors: Angelo
authors: A
authors: Santi
authors: Patrick
authors: P
authors: Van Rooyen
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D010856:Columbidae; D003463:Cues; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D008027:Light; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology*
references: Behav Processes. 2006 May 1;72(2):128-38
references: 16473481
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 1989 Nov;52(3):311-24
references: 2584917
references: Q J Exp Psychol B. 2000 Nov;53(4):309-23
references: 11131788
references: Behav Processes. 2006 May 1;72(2):139-48
references: 16481126
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1983 Jul;9(3):320-34
references: 6886634
references: J Exp Anal Behav. 1999 Nov;72(3):467-72
references: 10605105
references: Behav Processes. 2005 Nov 1;70(3):209-22
references: 16095851