Computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: definitive or detrimental?
OBJECTIVE
Utilization of computed tomography (CT) scans in patients with presumed appendicitis was evaluated at a single institution to determine the sensitivity of this diagnostic test and its effect on clinical outcome.


METHODS
Adult patients (age > 17 years) with appendicitis were identified from hospital records. Findings at surgery, including the incidence of perforation, were correlated with imaging results.


RESULTS
During a 3-year period, 411 patients underwent appendectomy for presumed acute appendicitis at our institution. Of these patients, 256 (62%) underwent preoperative CT, and the remaining 155 (38%) patients did not have imaging before the surgery. The time interval between arrival in the emergency room to time in the operating room was longer for patients who had preoperative imaging (8.2 +/- 0.3 h) compared to those who did not (5.1 +/- 0.2 h, p < 0.001). Moreover, this possible delay in intervention was associated with a higher rate of appendiceal perforation in the CT group (17 versus 8%, p = 0.017).


CONCLUSIONS
Preoperative CT scanning in patients with presumed appendicitis should be used selectively as widespread utilization may adversely affect outcomes. The potential negative impact of CT imaging includes a delay in operative intervention and a potentially higher perforation rate.
Musunuru
Sandeepa
S
Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, H4/752 Clinical Science Center, 600 Highland Avenue, Madison, WI 53792, USA.
Chen
Herbert
H
Rikkers
Layton F
LF
Weber
Sharon M
SM
D000328:Adult; D001062:Appendectomy; D001064:Appendicitis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000601:surgery; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007416:Intestinal Perforation / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D008297:Male; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed; D016896:Treatment Outcome
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Mar;202(3):401-6
16500243
J Am Coll Surg. 2006 Dec;203(6):849-56
17116553
Arch Surg. 2001 May;136(5):556-62
11343547
Acad Emerg Med. 2003 Aug;10(8):823-9
12896881
Am J Surg. 2000 May;179(5):379-81
10930484
Dig Surg. 2003;20(3):215-9; discussion 220-1
12759501
Radiology. 2002 Oct;225(1):131-6
12354996
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2003 Fall;4(3):231-9
14588157
Ann Surg. 2006 Nov;244(5):656-60
17060754
N Engl J Med. 1998 Jan 15;338(3):141-6
9428814
Am Surg. 2005 Oct;71(10 ):803-8
16468523
Am Fam Physician. 2005 Jan 1;71(1):71-8
15663029
J Surg Res. 2002 Jul;106(1):131-6
12127818
Am Surg. 2002 Nov;68(11):1003-7
12455796
Arch Surg. 2004 May;139(5):495-9; discussion 499-500
15136349
Am J Surg. 2000 Dec;180(6):450-4; discussion 454-5
11182396
Br J Surg. 2004 Dec;91(12 ):1641-5
15386320
Am Surg. 2006 Apr;72 (4):326-9
16676857