Comparison of the prognostic significance of the electrocardiographic QRS/T angles in predicting incident coronary heart disease and total mortality (from the atherosclerosis risk in communities study).
Spatial QRS/T angle and spatial T-wave axis were shown to be strong independent predictors of incident coronary heart disease (CHD) and total mortality, but they are not routinely available. We evaluated whether frontal plane QRS/T angle, easily obtained as the difference between frontal plane axes of QRS and T, provides a suitable substitute for spatial QRS/T angle as a risk predictor. Our study consisted of 13,973 participants from the ARIC Study. Outcome variables were incident CHD and total mortality during a median follow-up of 14 years. Electrocardiographic variables were categorized as abnormal (>/=95th percentile), borderline (>/=75th and <95th percentile), and normal (<75th percentile) separately for men and women. Cox regression was used to assess the effect of electrocardiographic variables on risk of each outcome. The normal category was considered the reference cell. With adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics, both QRS/T angles were approximately equally strong predictors of total mortality with >50% increased risk. Spatial QRS/T angle was a stronger predictor of incident CHD in women, with a 114% increased risk, but it was not significantly associated with risk of incident CHD in men. Similarly, frontal plane QRS/T angle was statistically significant for only women with a 74% increased risk of incident CHD. In conclusion, frontal plane QRS/T angle as an easily derived risk measure is a suitable clinical substitute for spatial QRS/T angle for risk prediction.
Zhang
Zhu-Ming
ZM
Department of Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA. zmzhang@wfubmc.edu
Prineas
Ronald J
RJ
Case
Douglas
D
Soliman
Elsayed Z
EZ
Rautaharju
Pentti M
PM
D000787:Angina Pectoris / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000401:mortality; D015331:Cohort Studies; D003327:Coronary Disease / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000401:mortality; D003920:Diabetes Mellitus / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000401:mortality; D004562:Electrocardiography / Q000145:classification*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D005544:Forecasting; D006801:Humans; D006973:Hypertension / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000401:mortality; D015994:Incidence; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000401:mortality; D017202:Myocardial Ischemia / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000401:mortality; D011159:Population Surveillance; D011379:Prognosis; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012307:Risk Factors; D012737:Sex Factors; D014481:United States / Q000453:epidemiology
Eur Heart J. 1990 Dec;11(12):1083-92
2292255
Methods Inf Med. 1990 Sep;29(4):362-74
2233384
J Electrocardiol. 1988 Nov;21(4):361-7
3241148
Am J Epidemiol. 1989 Apr;129(4):687-702
2646917
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985 Sep;6(3):572-80
3161926
Circulation. 1973 Sep;48(3):541-8
4726236
Cardiology. 2004;101(4):199-207
14967963
Hypertension. 2004 Jul;44(1):48-54
15173125
J Electrocardiol. 1973;6(2):103-11
4575373
J Electrocardiol. 2003;36 Suppl:113-4
14716610
Eur Heart J. 2003 Jul;24(14):1357-64
12871693
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2002 Dec;13(12):1211-8
12521335
Circulation. 2006 Jan 31;113(4):464-6
16449723
Am J Cardiol. 2006 Feb 1;97(3):309-15
16442387
Circulation. 2006 Jan 3;113(1):67-73
16365195
Heart Rhythm. 2005 Jan;2(1):73-8
15851268
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2005;5(1):2
15644132
Circulation. 2006 Jan 31;113(4):473-80
16449726
Circulation. 2006 Jan 31;113(4):481-9
16449727
Am J Cardiol. 2002 Dec 15;90(12):1391-5
12480053
Lancet. 1998 Aug 22;352(9128):601-5
9746020
J Electrocardiol. 1998 Jul;31(3):157-87
9682893
J Clin Epidemiol. 1996 Feb;49(2):223-33
8606324
Circulation. 2000 Sep 12;102(11):1252-7
10982539
J Hum Hypertens. 2001 Jan;15(1):63-70
11224004
Am J Cardiol. 2001 Jul 15;88(2):118-23
11448406
Circulation. 2002 Mar 5;105(9):1066-70
11877356