From Avicennia to Zizania: seed recalcitrance in perspective.
BACKGROUND
Considered only in terms of tolerance of, or sensitivity to, desiccation (which is an oversimplification), orthodox seeds are those which tolerate dehydration and are storable in this condition, while highly recalcitrant seeds are damaged by loss of only a small proportion of water and are unstorable for practical purposes. Between these extremes, however, there may be a gradation of the responses to dehydration--and also to other factors--suggesting perhaps that seed behaviour might be best considered as constituting a continuum subtended by extreme orthodoxy and the highest degree of recalcitrance. As the characteristics of seeds of an increasing number of species are elucidated, non-orthodox seed behaviour is emerging as considerably more commonplace--and its basis far more complex--than previously suspected.


METHODS
Whatever the post-harvest responses of seeds of individual species may be, they are the outcome of the properties of pre-shedding development, and a full understanding of the subtleties of various degrees of non-orthodox behaviour must await the identification of, and interaction among, all the factors conferring extreme orthodoxy. Appreciation of the phenomenon of recalcitrance is confounded by intra- and interseasonal variability across species, as well as within individual species. However, recent evidence suggests that provenance is a pivotal factor in determining the degree of recalcitrant behaviour exhibited by seeds of individual species. Non-orthodox--and, in particular, recalcitrant--seed behaviour is not merely a matter of desiccation sensitivity: the primary basis is that the seeds are actively metabolic when they are shed, in contrast to orthodox types which are quiescent. This affects all aspects of the handling and storage of recalcitrant seeds. In the short to medium term, recalcitrant seeds should be stored in as hydrated a condition as when they are shed, and at the lowest temperature not diminishing vigour or viability. Such hydrated storage has attendant problems of fungal proliferation which, unless minimized, will inevitably and significantly affect seed quality. The life span of seeds in hydrated storage even under the best conditions is variable among species, but is curtailed (days to months), and various approaches attempting to extend non-orthodox seed longevity are discussed. Conservation of the genetic resources by means other than seed storage is then briefly considered, with detail on the potential for, and difficulties with, cryostorage highlighted.


CONCLUSIONS
There appears to be little taxonomic relationship among species exhibiting the phenomenon of seed recalcitrance, suggesting that it is a derived trait, with tolerance having been lost a number of times. Although recalcitrant seededness is best represented in the mesic tropics, particularly among rainforest climax species, it does occur in cooler, drier and markedly seasonal habitats. The selective advantages of the trait are considered.
Berjak
Patricia
P
School of Biological & Conservation Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa. berjak@ukzn.ac.za
Pammenter
N W
NW
D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D032407:Avicennia / Q000502:physiology*; D005075:Biological Evolution; D003890:Desiccation; D017753:Ecosystem; D012275:Oryza / Q000502:physiology*; D012639:Seeds / Q000502:physiology*
Biochim Biophys Acta. 2001 Jan 12;1544(1-2):196-206
11341929
Plant Physiol. 1991 May;96(1):302-4
16668169
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2004 Jun;7(3):323-8
15134754
J Exp Bot. 2005 Aug;56(418):2119-30
15967778
Int J Dev Biol. 2005;49(5-6):645-51
16096971
J Exp Biol. 1998 Apr;201(Pt 8):1203-9
9510531
Cryobiology. 2004 Jun;48(3):215-28
15157771
Plant Physiol. 1991 Aug;96(4):1093-8
16668303
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2006 May-Jun;44(5-6):359-68
16889978
Plant Physiol. 1998 Nov;118(3):975-86
9808742
Plant Physiol. 1988 Nov;88(3):829-32
16666392
Cryo Letters. 2004 Mar-Apr;25(2):129-38
15216394
Cryobiology. 2001 May;42(3):196-206
11578119
Plant Physiol. 1999 Jun;120(2):463-72
10364397
Plant Physiol. 2002 Apr;128(4):1323-31
11950981
Plant Physiol. 1993 Dec;103(4):1035-1040
12231998
Plant Physiol. 1997 Sep;115(1):71-7
9306691
Tree Physiol. 2000 May;20(10):693-699
12651519
Plant J. 2005 Jan;41(1):133-45
15610356
Planta. 2006 Apr;223(5):1081-9
16307284
Cryobiology. 2001 Sep;43(2):151-67
11846470
J Exp Bot. 2006;57(10):2303-11
16798844
Ann Bot. 2006 Apr;97(4):667-74
16464874
Plant Physiol. 1989 Mar;89(3):977-81
16666651
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2006 Oct;44(10):556-63
17070689
Integr Comp Biol. 2005 Nov;45(5):734-40
21676824
Plant Cell. 2006 Jul;18(7):1642-51
16731585
Planta. 1999 Oct;209(4):377-88
10550618
Plant J. 2002 Jul;31(1):13-24
12100479
Plant J. 1999 Jul;19(1):1-8
10417721
Plant J. 2006 Sep;47(5):735-50
16923015
Am J Bot. 2004 Jun;91(6):863-70
21653442
Planta. 1992 Jan;186(2):249-61
24186665
Plant Physiol. 2006 Apr;140(4):1418-36
16461389
Tree Physiol. 2003 Nov;23(16):1147-52
14522720
Tree Physiol. 2005 Aug;25(8):965-72
15929927
Funct Plant Biol. 2006 Feb;33(1):59-66
32689214
Cryo Letters. 2004 Mar-Apr;25(2):121-8
15216393
Integr Comp Biol. 2005 Nov;45(5):696-701
21676819
Ann Bot. 2003 Sep;92(3):401-8
12881405
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2003;54:93-107
14502986
Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2002 Mar;131(3):545-58
11867280
Cryo Letters. 2006 Jan-Feb;27(1):5-16
16691305
Planta. 1989 May;178(2):189-98
24212748
Science. 2005 Jan 7;307(5706):47-9
15637256