title: Endoscopic harvest of saphenous vein: a lesson learned from 1,348 cases.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Endoscopic harvest of saphenous vein is a relatively new technique developed to minimize the wound and postoperative complications. This technique has gained patients' acceptance and become popular in cardiac surgical practices. Because most centers have limited experience with this approach, the authors summarize the clinical profiles of patients undergoing endoscopic vessel harvest (EVH).
  
  
  METHODS
  Between March 2001 and August 2006, 1,348 patients (945 men and 403 women) with a mean age of 67.2 years (range, 28-89 years) underwent EVH of saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass surgery, peripheral artery reconstruction, and miscellaneous conditions. The EVH technique was performed using the Vasoview system (Guidant, Menlo Park, CA, USA) under the assistance of carbon dioxide (CO(2)) insufflation.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Technical success was achieved in 98.6% of the cases. Two saphenous veins were discarded because of obvious vein injury. The mean harvest time was 45 min: 68 min for the first 50 cases and 23 min for the last 200 cases. Nearly all the patients (98%) had saphenous vein harvested only from the thighs, whereas only 1.5% of the patients had saphenous vein harvested from the legs. Postoperative wound complications were experienced by 61 patients including 25 tract hematomas, 19 wound dehiscences or poor healing, 16 wound infections, and 1 overlying skin necrosis. Overall, 13 subsequent revisions were required for these complications. Detectable air embolisms occurred for 143 patients and numbness in the saphenous nerve territory for 169 patients.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The findings showed EVH of saphenous vein to be a valid alternative to open saphenectomy, providing excellent surgical results. Therefore, EVH should be considered as the standard of care for saphenous vein harvest.
authors: Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Far-Eastern Memorial Hospital, 13F, 21, Sec. 2, Nan-Ya S. Road, Pan-Chiao, Taipei County, 220, Taiwan.
authors: K-M
authors: KM
authors: Chiu
authors: C-L
authors: CL
authors: Chen
authors: S-H
authors: SH
authors: Chu
authors: T-Y
authors: TY
authors: Lin
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D015331:Cohort Studies; D001026:Coronary Artery Bypass / Q000379:methods*; D003327:Coronary Disease / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000601:surgery; D004724:Endoscopy / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011859:Radiography; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012501:Saphenous Vein / Q000637:transplantation*; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D020858:Tissue and Organ Harvesting / Q000379:methods*; D016896:Treatment Outcome
references: Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Jun;50(3):160-3
references: 12077689
references: Am J Surg. 2002 May;183(5):576-9
references: 12034397
references: Heart Surg Forum. 2000;3(4):325-30
references: 11178296
references: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003 Dec;126(6):2011-5
references: 14688720
references: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002 Feb;123(2):204-12
references: 11828277
references: Heart Surg Forum. 2001;4(1):53-5
references: 11502498
references: Surg Neurol. 2005 Jun;63(6):565-8; discussion 568
references: 15936390
references: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005 Mar;129(3):496-503
references: 15746730
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2002 Feb;73(2):523-8
references: 11845868
references: Curr Opin Cardiol. 2003 Nov;18(6):444-6
references: 14597884
references: Heart Surg Forum. 2003;6(6):E143-5
references: 14722001
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2000 Feb;69(2):520-3
references: 10735691
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 May;81(5):1697-9
references: 16631658
references: Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Jun;79(6):2013-7
references: 15919301
references: Am J Surg. 2001 Dec;182(6):716-9
references: 11839345
references: J Vasc Surg. 2005 Sep;42(3):442-8
references: 16171585