title: A framework for evaluating usability of clinical monitoring technology.
abstract: Technology design is a complex task, and acceptability is enhanced when usability is central to its design. Evaluating usability is a challenge for purchasers and developers of technology. We have developed a framework for testing the usability of clinical monitoring technology through literature review and experience designing clinical monitors. The framework can help designers meet key international usability norms. The framework includes these direct testing methods: thinking aloud, question asking, co-discovery, performance and psychophysiological measurement. Indirect testing methods include: questionnaires and interviews, observation and ethnographic studies, and self-reporting logs. Inspection, a third usability testing method, is also included. The use of these methods is described and practical examples of how they would be used in the development of an innovative monitor are given throughout. This framework is built on a range of methods to ensure harmony between users and new clinical monitoring technology, and have been selected to be practical to use.
authors: Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, and Therapeutics, The University of British Columbia, Room E414A, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6H 3V4. jdaniels2@cw.bc.ca
authors: Jeremy
authors: J
authors: Daniels
authors: Sidney
authors: S
authors: Fels
authors: Andre
authors: A
authors: Kushniruk
authors: Joanne
authors: J
authors: Lim
authors: J Mark
authors: JM
authors: Ansermino
mesh_terms: D000884:Anthropology, Cultural; D017144:Focus Groups; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008991:Monitoring, Physiologic; D019370:Observation; D011603:Psychophysiology; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical / Q000379:methods*
references: Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp. 1997;:218-22
references: 9357620
references: Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13 Suppl 1:i65-71
references: 15465958
references: J Biomed Inform. 2004 Feb;37(1):56-76
references: 15016386
references: Anesth Analg. 2005 Dec;101(6):1719-24
references: 16301248
references: Qual Saf Health Care. 2004 Oct;13(5):330-4
references: 15465935