Extensive horizontal transfer of core genome genes between two Lactobacillus species found in the gastrointestinal tract.
BACKGROUND
While genes that are conserved between related bacterial species are usually thought to have evolved along with the species, phylogenetic trees reconstructed for individual genes may contradict this picture and indicate horizontal gene transfer. Individual trees are often not resolved with high confidence, however, and in that case alternative trees are generally not considered as contradicting the species tree, although not confirming it either. Here we conduct an in-depth analysis of 401 protein phylogenetic trees inferred with varying levels of confidence for three lactobacilli from the acidophilus complex. At present the relationship between these bacteria, isolated from environments as diverse as the gastrointestinal tract (Lactobacillus acidophilus and Lactobacillus johnsonii) and yogurt (Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus), is ambiguous due to contradictory phenotypical and 16S rRNA based classifications.


RESULTS
Among the 401 phylogenetic trees, those that could be reconstructed with high confidence support the 16S-rRNA tree or one alternative topology in an astonishing 3:2 ratio, while the third possible topology is practically absent. Lowering the confidence threshold for trees to be taken into consideration does not significantly affect this ratio, and therefore suggests that gene transfer may have affected as much as 40% of the core genome genes. Gene function bias suggests that the 16S rRNA phylogeny of the acidophilus complex, which indicates that L. acidophilus and L. delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus are the closest related of these three species, is correct. A novel approach of comparison of interspecies protein divergence data employed in this study allowed to determine that gene transfer most likely took place between the lineages of the two species found in the gastrointestinal tract.


CONCLUSIONS
This case-study reports an unprecedented level of phylogenetic incongruence, presumably resulting from extensive horizontal gene transfer. The data give a first indication of the large extent of gene transfer that may take place in the gastrointestinal tract and its accumulated effect. For future studies, our results should encourage a careful weighing of data on phylogenetic tree topology, confidence and distribution to conclude on the absence or presence and extent of horizontal gene transfer.
Nicolas
Pierre
P
INRA, Mathématique Informatique et Génome, UR1077, 78350 Jouy en Josas, France. pierre.nicolas@jouy.inra.fr
Bessières
Philippe
P
Ehrlich
S Dusko
SD
Maguin
Emmanuelle
E
van de Guchte
Maarten
M
D000818:Animals; D001426:Bacterial Proteins / Q000235:genetics; D001482:Base Composition; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D041981:Gastrointestinal Tract / Q000382:microbiology; D022761:Gene Transfer, Horizontal; D005798:Genes, Bacterial; D006801:Humans; D007778:Lactobacillus / Q000235:genetics*; D007779:Lactobacillus acidophilus / Q000235:genetics; D048668:Lactobacillus delbrueckii / Q000235:genetics; D016013:Likelihood Functions; D010802:Phylogeny; D012329:RNA, Bacterial / Q000235:genetics*; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S / Q000235:genetics*
D001426:Bacterial Proteins; D012329:RNA, Bacterial; D012336:RNA, Ribosomal, 16S
Mol Biol Evol. 1988 Sep;5(5):568-83
3193878
PLoS Biol. 2005 May;3(5):e130
15799709
Trends Microbiol. 2004 Sep;12(9):406-11
15337161
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Mar 30;96(7):3801-6
10097118
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Feb 24;101(8):2512-7
14983040
Comput Appl Biosci. 1997 Oct;13(5):555-6
9367129
Nat Biotechnol. 2003 Apr;21(4):435-9
12627170
Syst Zool. 1970 Jun;19(2):99-113
5449325
Cell. 2006 Feb 24;124(4):837-48
16497592
Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Jan;21(1):108-16
14595100
PLoS Biol. 2003 Oct;1(1):E19
12975657
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 2;98(1):182-7
11136255
Science. 2003 Sep 12;301(5639):1482; author reply 1482
12970547
Bioinformatics. 2001 Dec;17(12):1246-7
11751242
J Bacteriol. 2007 Feb;189(4):1311-21
17142402
Genome Res. 2000 Jul;10(7):991-1000
10899148
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Jul;23(7):1348-56
16621913
Trends Microbiol. 2004 Sep;12(9):412-6
15337162
J Mol Evol. 1985;22(2):160-74
3934395
Int J Food Microbiol. 1998 May 26;41(2):103-25
9704860
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 5;102(27):9481-6
15983378
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2005 Sep;3(9):679-87
16138096
Infect Genet Evol. 2006 Mar;6(2):97-112
16503511
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 May 3;102 Suppl 1:6595-9
15851673
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Feb 18;100(4):1990-5
12566566
Cladistics. 2005 Apr;21(2):163-193
34892859
EMBO Rep. 2003 Jul;4(7):692-8
12792655
Science. 2003 Aug 8;301(5634):829-32
12907801
Bioinformatics. 2002 Mar;18(3):502-4
11934758
Syst Biol. 2002 Jun;51(3):492-508
12079646
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2003 Oct;47(10):3373-4
14506063
Bioinformatics. 2002;18 Suppl 1:S276-84
12169557
Nat Biotechnol. 2005 Dec;23(12):1527-33
16273110
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Oct;22(10):1948-63
15944438
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Mar 15;102(11):3906-12
15671160
Genome Res. 2006 Sep;16(9):1099-108
16899658
J Mol Evol. 1994 Sep;39(3):306-14
7932792
J Bacteriol. 1991 Nov;173(22):7257-68
1938920
Science. 2000 Nov 3;290(5493):972-7
11062127
J Bacteriol. 2004 Oct;186(19):6575-85
15375139
Am J Clin Nutr. 2001 Feb;73(2 Suppl):374S-379S
11157344
PLoS Comput Biol. 2005 Jun;1(1):e3
16103904
J Mol Evol. 1999 Mar;48(3):284-90
10093217
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Feb 27;98(5):2497-502
11226267
PLoS Genet. 2006 May;2(5):e68
16733550
Nat Genet. 2001 Jul;28(3):281-5
11431701
Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 Nov 11;22(22):4673-80
7984417
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jun 13;103(24):9274-9
16754859
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Mar 1;102(9):3179-80
15728394
Comput Appl Biosci. 1992 Jun;8(3):275-82
1633570