Questioning nuclear waste substitution: a case study.
This article looks at the ethical quandaries, and their social and political context, which emerge as a result of international nuclear waste substitution. In particular it addresses the dilemmas inherent within the proposed return of nuclear waste owned by Japanese nuclear companies and currently stored in the United Kingdom. The UK company responsible for this waste, British Nuclear Fuels Limited (BNFL), wish to substitute this high volume intermediate-level Japanese-owned radioactive waste for a much lower volume of much more highly radioactive waste. Special focus is given to ethical problems that they, and the UK government, have not wished to address as they move forward with waste substitution. The conclusion is that waste substitution can only be considered an ethical practice if a set of moderating conditions are observed by all parties. These conditions are listed and, as of yet, they are not being observed.
Marshall
Alan
A
Sustaining Gondwana Initiative, Department of Environmental Biology and Alcoa Research Centre for Stronger Communities, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U9187, Perth, WA 6845, Australia. A.Marshall@exchange.curtin.edu.au
D006801:Humans; D007391:International Cooperation; D007564:Japan; D011850:Radioactive Waste; D011996:Records; D012637:Security Measures / Q000941:ethics; D014186:Transportation / Q000941:ethics; D006113:United Kingdom; D018505:Waste Management / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence
D011850:Radioactive Waste