title: Combined vaginal-laparoscopic-abdominal approach for the surgical treatment of rectovaginal endometriosis with bowel resection: a comparison of this new technique with various established approaches by laparoscopy and laparotomy.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  A new combined vaginal-laparoscopic-abdominal approach for rectovaginal endometriosis allows intraoperative digital bowel palpation to assess bowel infiltration and prevents unnecessary bowel resections. This technique was compared to various established approaches where bowel resection was indicated by clinical symptoms and imaging results only.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patients operated for rectovaginal endometriosis with endometriotic bowel involvement between March 2002 and April 2006 at the gynecological department Charité, Berlin, Germany were included. Bowel involvement was suspected by clinical symptoms, clinical examination, and/or results of imaging techniques. The study group (SG) was operated by the combined vaginal-laparoscopic-abdominal approach (n = 30) and the control group (CG) (n = 18) by laparoscopy (n = 4), laparotomy (n = 3), laparoscopy followed by laparotomy for bowel resection (n = 8) or laparoscopy followed by vaginal bowel resection (n = 3). In all cases histopathology was performed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The study group and the control group were comparable regarding age, body mass index, symptoms, American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) classification, colorectal operative procedures, operating times, length of the resected bowel specimen, and concomitant surgical procedures. However, only in the CG were protective stomas required (p = 0.047). There were significantly less complications in the SG (p = 0.027). No patient experienced leakage of anastomosis. Bowel involvement by endometriosis was confirmed by histopathology in the SG in all cases whereas in the CG only in 16/18 (88.9%) cases. Hospitalization time was significantly shorter in the SG. Rehospitalizations were necessary only in the CG to repair one rectovaginal fistula and to reverse three stomas.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  With the presented technique of a combined vaginal-laparoscopic-abdominal surgical procedure for rectovaginal endometriosis, we showed that the complication rate, rehospitalization rate, and hospitalization time were significantly lower than in the patients of the CG. Furthermore, the combined vaginal-laparoscopic-abdominal technique allowed better evaluation of the invasiveness of the endometriotic lesion and avoided unnecessary bowel surgery.
authors: Department of Gynecology, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. rzanetti@uhbs.ch
authors: Rosanna
authors: R
authors: Zanetti-Dällenbach
authors: Julia
authors: J
authors: Bartley
authors: Christine
authors: C
authors: Müller
authors: Achim
authors: A
authors: Schneider
authors: Christhardt
authors: C
authors: Köhler
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D004715:Endometriosis / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy; D007813:Laparotomy; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D012002:Rectal Diseases / Q000601:surgery*; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014623:Vaginal Diseases / Q000601:surgery*
references: Hum Reprod. 1996 Oct;11(10):2263-8
references: 8943540
references: J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2007 Mar-Apr;14(2):256-9
references: 17368268
references: Eur J Surg. 1996 Feb;162(2):139-41
references: 8639727
references: Fertil Steril. 2001 Aug;76(2):358-65
references: 11476786
references: Hum Reprod. 2006 Jun;21(6):1629-34
references: 16495305
references: Fertil Steril. 1990 Mar;53(3):411-6
references: 2307243
references: J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001 Feb;8(1):55-60
references: 11172115
references: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Apr;190(4):1020-4
references: 15118634
references: BJOG. 2000 Jan;107(1):44-54
references: 10645861
references: Hum Reprod. 2006 May;21(5):1243-7
references: 16439504
references: Hum Reprod. 2003 Jun;18(6):1323-7
references: 12773467
references: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Nov;195(5):1303-10
references: 16707075
references: Surg Endosc. 1999 Nov;13(11):1125-8
references: 10556452
references: Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1997 Sep;104(9):1014-8
references: 9307527
references: Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Aug;14(4):357-64
references: 12151824
references: J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2001 Feb;8(1):12-7
references: 11274616
references: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Feb;192(2):394-400
references: 15695977
references: J Reprod Med. 1992 Aug;37(8):695-8
references: 1432985
references: Hum Reprod. 2003 Sep;18(9):1922-7
references: 12923150
references: Obstet Gynecol. 1987 May;69(5):727-30
references: 3574800
references: JSLS. 2005 Jan-Mar;9(1):73-7
references: 15791975
references: Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001 Apr;80(4):349-54
references: 11264611
references: J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1960 Aug;67:539-55
references: 14419249
references: J Reprod Med. 1988 Oct;33(10):806-8
references: 2973525
references: Fertil Steril. 1996 Jan;65(1):193-7
references: 8557141
references: Hum Reprod. 2005 Aug;20(8):2317-20
references: 15878923
references: J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris). 2004 Nov;33(7):600-6
references: 15550878
references: Radiol Med. 2006 Aug;111(5):687-701
references: 16791463
references: Dis Colon Rectum. 1998 Sep;41(9):1158-64
references: 9749501
references: Fertil Steril. 1997 May;67(5):817-21
references: 9130884
references: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Nov;191(5):1539-42
references: 15547522
references: Zentralbl Gynakol. 2003 Jul-Aug;125(7-8):259-66
references: 14505261
references: Fertil Steril. 2005 Nov;84(5):1375-87
references: 16275232
references: J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Dec;195(6):754-8
references: 12495306
references: Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Aug;96(2):304-7
references: 10960302
references: BJOG. 2004 Apr;111(4):353-6
references: 15008772