Experiences of refugees and asylum seekers in general practice: a qualitative study.
BACKGROUND
There has been much debate regarding the refugee health situation in the UK. However most of the existing literature fails to take account of the opinions of refugees themselves. This study was established to determine the views of asylum seekers and refugees on their overall experiences in primary care and to suggest improvements to their care.


METHODS
Qualitative study of adult asylum seekers and refugees who had entered the UK in the last 10 years. The study was set in Barnet Refugee Walk in Service, London. 11 Semi structured interviews were conducted and analysed using framework analysis.


RESULTS
Access to GPs may be more difficult for failed asylum seekers and those without support from refugee agencies or family. There may be concerns amongst some in the refugee community regarding the access to and confidentiality of professional interpreters. Most participants stated their preference for GPs who offered advice rather than prescriptions. The stigma associated with refugee status in the UK may have led to some refugees altering their help seeking behaviour.


CONCLUSIONS
The problem of poor access for those with inadequate support may be improved by better education and support for GPs in how to provide for refugees. Primary Care Trusts could also supply information to newly arrived refugees on how to access services. GPs should be aware that, in some situations, professional interpreters may not always be desired and that instead, it may be advisable to reach a consensus as to who should be used as an interpreter. A better doctor-patient experience resulting from improvements in access and communication may help to reduce the stigma associated with refugee status and lead to more appropriate help seeking behaviour. Given the small nature of our investigation, larger studies need to be conducted to confirm and to quantify these results.
Bhatia
Ravi
R
Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Royal Free and University College Medical School, Holborn Union Building, Archway Campus, Highgate Hill, London, N19 5LW, UK. r.bhatia@ucl.ac.uk
Wallace
Paul
P
D003144:Communication Barriers; D005194:Family Practice; D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D006301:Health Services Needs and Demand; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic / Q000379:methods; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D012036:Refugees / Q000523:psychology*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D006113:United Kingdom
BMJ. 2006 Jan 14;332(7533):115-7
16410592
Fam Pract. 2006 Feb;23(1):111-5
16246851
BMJ. 1999 Mar 6;318(7184):671
10215371
BMJ. 2000 Jan 8;320(7227):114-6
10625273
BMJ. 2001 Sep 22;323(7314):653
11566825
BMJ. 1998 Nov 21;317(7170):1444-6
9822406
BMJ. 2003 Dec 13;327(7428):1400-2
14670893
Aust Fam Physician. 2004 Jan-Feb;33(1-2):23-4
14988955
Lancet. 2005 Feb 26-Mar 4;365(9461):732-3
15733700
BMJ. 2000 Jul 1;321(7252):5-6
10875810
Clin Med (Lond). 2004 Jul-Aug;4(4):366-8
15372899
Public Health. 2002 Jul;116(4):221-6
12087481
BMJ. 2001 Feb 24;322(7284):468-72
11222423
BMJ. 2004 Mar 27;328(7442):770
15044310
BMJ. 2004 Sep 18;329(7467):683
15374925
Ethn Health. 2004 Feb;9(1):55-73
15203465
BMJ. 1998 May 16;316(7143):1476
9582130
BMJ. 1999 Sep 18;319(7212):738-43
10487999
Soc Sci Med. 2003 Aug;57(3):503-12
12791492
Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Oct;50(459):827-8
11127181
J Gen Intern Med. 2003 Jan;18(1):44-52
12534763
Lancet. 1999 May 1;353(9163):1497-8
10232324
BMJ. 2001 Feb 24;322(7284):485-8
11222429
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2005 May;111(5):351-7
15819728
Patient Educ Couns. 2006 May;61(2):236-45
15967625
Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Jul;50(456):531-2
10954931
Patient Educ Couns. 2003 Oct;51(2):99-106
14572938
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Sep;63(5):1170-87
16697095
BMJ. 2006 Jan 28;332(7535):236
16439412
BMJ. 2004 Aug 7;329(7461):322-3
15277294