title: Contextual cues and the retrieval of information from cognitive maps.
abstract: In three experiments, we investigated how retrieval cues affect memory for cognitive maps. Participants first rated a list of landmarks either for the importance of the activity performed or for the frequency of visitation at each landmark (Experiments 1 and 2), or on both dimensions (Experiment 3). Landmarks ranked high and low on these dimensions were selected and served as the bases for distance estimations and route descriptions. Distances estimated using importance as a criterion for selection were significantly longer than those using frequency of visitation as a criterion. Participants in the importance group also produced more route perspective expressions than survey expressions in their descriptions, whereas participants in the frequency group did not differ in the relative use of these types of perspective expressions (Experiment 1). These findings suggest that deviations in distance estimation and the use of perspectives in route description are a result of contextual manipulation and the procedures invoked during judgments.
authors: University of Plymouth, Plymouth, England.
authors: Davi
authors: D
authors: Bugmann
authors: Kenny R
authors: KR
authors: Coventry
authors: Stephen E
authors: SE
authors: Newstead
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003071:Cognition; D003463:Cues; D004215:Distance Perception; D005260:Female; D005843:Geography; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory; D008875:Middle Aged
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1980 Jan;6(1):13-24
references: 7373242
references: Cogn Psychol. 1997 Nov;34(2):160-90
references: 9398395
references: Neuron. 2002 Aug 15;35(4):625-41
references: 12194864
references: Psychol Rev. 1948 Jul;55(4):189-208
references: 18870876
references: Behav Brain Res. 1989 Aug 1;34(1-2):35-42
references: 2765170
references: Cogn Psychol. 1982 Oct;14(4):560-89
references: 7140211
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1986 Apr;12(2):220-31
references: 2939179
references: Mem Cognit. 1999 Mar;27(2):309-19
references: 10226440
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1987 Oct;13(4):615-28
references: 2959744
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1980 Sep;6(5):516-28
references: 7430967
references: Mem Cognit. 1985 May;13(3):218-27
references: 4046822