Retracting and seeking movements during laparoscopic goal-oriented movements. Is the shortest path length optimal?
OBJECTIVE
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) requires a high degree of eye-hand coordination from the surgeon. To facilitate the learning process, objective assessment systems based on analysis of the instruments' motion are being developed. To investigate the influence of performance on motion characteristics, we examined goal-oriented movements in a box trainer. In general, goal-oriented movements consist of a retracting and a seeking phase, and are, however, not performed via the shortest path length. Therefore, we hypothesized that the shortest path is not an optimal concept in MIS.


METHODS
Participants were divided into three groups (experts, residents, and novices). Each participant performed a number of one-hand positioning tasks in a box trainer. Movements of the instrument were recorded with the TrEndo tracking system. The movement from point A to B was divided into two phases: A-M (retracting) and M-B (seeking). Normalized path lengths (given in %) of the two phases were compared.


RESULTS
Thirty eight participants contributed. For the retracting phase, we found no significant difference between experts [median (range) %: 152 (129-178)], residents [164 (126-250)], and novices [168 (136-268)]. In the seeking phase, we find a significant difference (<0.001) between experts [180 (172-247)], residents [201 (163-287)], and novices [290 (244-469)]. Moreover, within each group, a significant difference between retracting and seeking phases was observed.


CONCLUSIONS
Goal-oriented movements in MIS can be split into two phases: retracting and seeking. Novices are less effective than experts and residents in the seeking phase. Therefore, the seeking phase is characteristic of performance differences. Furthermore, the retracting phase is essential, because it improves safety by avoiding intermediate tissue contact. Therefore, the shortest path length, as presently used during the assessment of basic MIS skills, may be not a proper concept for analyzing optimal movements and, therefore, needs to be revised.
Chmarra
Magdalena K
MK
Department of BioMechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 2, 2628, CD, Delft, The Netherlands. m.k.chmarra@tudelft.nl
Jansen
Frank Willem
FW
Grimbergen
Cornelis A
CA
Dankelman
Jenny
J
D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D002983:Clinical Competence; D004724:Endoscopy / Q000193:education*; D013502:General Surgery / Q000193:education; D006176:Gynecology / Q000193:education; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D009048:Motor Skills; D009068:Movement; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D014584:User-Computer Interface
Surg Endosc. 2003 Feb;17(2):220-6
12436236
Exp Brain Res. 1999 Nov;129(2):201-10
10591894
Qual Health Care. 2001 Dec;10 Suppl 2:ii64-9
11700382
Br J Surg. 2004 Dec;91(12):1549-58
15547882
Am J Surg. 2005 Sep;190(3):507-11
16105545
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2005;14(4):214-23
16754167
Br J Surg. 2003 Oct;90(10):1285-6
14515301
Am J Surg. 2003 Feb;185(2):146-9
12559445
Biol Cybern. 1987;57(4-5):257-74
3689835
Surg Endosc. 2006 Sep;20(9):1460-6
16823649
Exp Brain Res. 1981;42(2):223-7
7262217
World J Surg. 2001 Nov;25(11):1478-83
11760752
Surg Endosc. 2001 Mar;15(3):242-4
11344422
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2006;119:79-84
16404019
Surg Endosc. 2003 Dec;17(12):1943-50
14574546
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Jun;85(6):2576-89
11387402