title: Congruency effects in the letter search task: semantic activation in the absence of priming.
abstract: Semantic priming is typically eliminated when participants perform a letter search on the prime, suggesting that semantic activation is conditional upon one's attentional goals. However, in such studies, semantic activation (or the lack thereof) is not measured during the letter search task itself but, instead, is inferred on the basis of the responses given to a later target. In the present study, direct online evidence for semanticactivation was tested using words whose meaning should bias either a positive or a negative response (e.g.,present vs. absent). In Experiment 1, a semantic congruency effect was obtained, with faster responses when the word meaning matched the required response. Experiment 2 replicated the congruency effect while, simultaneously, showing the elimination of semantic priming. It is concluded that letter search does not affect the initiation of semantic activation. Possible accounts for the elimination of priming following letter search include activation-based suppression and transfer-inappropriate processing.
authors: Department of Psychology, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana 59717-3440, USA. khutch@montana.edu
authors: Keith A
authors: KA
authors: Hutchison
authors: Frank A
authors: FA
authors: Bosco
mesh_terms: D000339:Affect; D006801:Humans; D008037:Linguistics; D011930:Reaction Time; D012660:Semantics; D014796:Visual Perception
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Sep;133(3):323-38
references: 15355142
references: Conscious Cogn. 1997 Jun-Sep;6(2-3):204-18
references: 9262409
references: Mem Cognit. 1994 Mar;22(2):157-68
references: 8035692
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1983 Oct;9(4):697-712
references: 6227683
references: Neuroreport. 2000 Aug 3;11(11):2401-7
references: 10943693
references: Psychol Rev. 1998 Apr;105(2):203-29
references: 9577237
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1993 Jul;19(4):813-40
references: 8345326
references: Can J Exp Psychol. 2002 Jun;56(2):112-9
references: 12066419
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 1997 Jun;4(2):221-5
references: 21331828
references: Psychol Sci. 2004 Dec;15(12):852-7
references: 15563331
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2001 Sep;27(5):1289-98
references: 11550755
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2004 Jun;11(3):458-62
references: 15376795
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1979 May;5(2):239-51
references: 528936
references: Mem Cognit. 1983 Jul;11(4):366-73
references: 6633255
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Dec;24(6):1642-55
references: 9861715
references: J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1995 Apr;17(2):291-321
references: 7629273
references: Q J Exp Psychol A. 1985 Nov;37(4):571-90
references: 4081101
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 Sep;18(5):993-1000
references: 1402720
references: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2000 Mar;9(2):137-46
references: 10729697
references: Psychol Bull. 1991 Mar;109(2):163-203
references: 2034749
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Jun;3(2):249-53
references: 24213876
references: Percept Psychophys. 1995 Jul;57(5):657-67
references: 7644326
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Dec;8(4):778-84
references: 11848599
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Mar;9(1):113-8
references: 12026942
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1991 Aug;17(3):792-806
references: 1834791
references: Am J Psychol. 2006 Summer;119(2):239-54
references: 16841780
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Dec;10(4):785-813
references: 15000531
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2000 Apr;26(2):469-79
references: 10811157
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Jun;8(2):324-30
references: 11495121
references: Mem Cognit. 2002 Dec;30(8):1263-76
references: 12661857
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997 Jun;23(3):845-60
references: 9180046
references: J Exp Psychol. 1969 Aug;81(2):275-80
references: 5811803
references: Q J Exp Psychol A. 2001 May;54(2):321-43
references: 11394050
references: Mem Cognit. 2000 Jun;28(4):635-47
references: 10946546
references: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 May;23(2-3):293-305
references: 15820637