title: Sexual selection maintains whole-body chiral dimorphism in snails.
abstract: Although the vast majority of higher animals are fixed for one chiral morph or another, the cause for this directionality is known in only a few cases. In snails, for example, rare individuals of the opposite coil are unable to mate with individuals of normal coil, so directionality is maintained by frequency-dependent selection. The snail subgenus Amphidromus presents an unexplained exception, because dextral (D) and sinistral (S) individuals occur sympatrically in roughly equal proportions (so-called 'antisymmetry') in most species. Here we show that in Amphidromus there is sexual selection for dimorphism, rather than selection for monomorphism. We found that matings between D and S individuals occur more frequently than expected by chance. Anatomical investigations showed that the chirality of the spermatophore and the female reproductive tract probably allow a greater fecundity in such inter-chiral matings. Computer simulation confirms that under these circumstances, sustained dimorphism is the expected outcome.
authors: Institute for Tropical Biology and Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia. schilthuizen@naturalis.nl
authors: M
authors: M
authors: Schilthuizen
authors: P G
authors: PG
authors: Craze
authors: A S
authors: AS
authors: Cabanban
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Davison
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Stone
authors: E
authors: E
authors: Gittenberger
authors: B J
authors: BJ
authors: Scott
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D019521:Body Patterning; D003198:Computer Simulation; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D052586:Mating Preference, Animal; D012727:Sex Characteristics; D012908:Snails / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology*; D013093:Spermatogonia / Q000166:cytology
references: Heredity (Edinb). 1976 Oct;37(2):271-82
references: 1068113
references: Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Apr 22;269(1493):861-5
references: 11958719
references: J Molluscan Stud. 2002 May;68(2):191-192
references: 12011248
references: Nature. 2002 Jun 13;417(6890):707
references: 12066175
references: Nature. 2003 Oct 16;425(6959):679
references: 14562091
references: Science. 2004 Oct 29;306(5697):828-33
references: 15514148
references: BMC Evol Biol. 2005 Mar 30;5:25
references: 15799778
references: Heredity (Edinb). 2005 Sep;95(3):216-20
references: 16077741
references: PLoS Biol. 2005 Sep;3(9):e282
references: 16149849
references: Naturwissenschaften. 2005 Nov;92(11):504-15
references: 16217668
references: Nature. 2006 Apr 6;440(7085):803-7
references: 16598259
references: Biol Lett. 2006 Sep 22;2(3):439-42
references: 17148425
references: J Evol Biol. 2007 Mar;20(2):661-72
references: 17305832
references: Science. 1923 Oct 5;58(1501):269-70
references: 17837785
references: Am Nat. 1998 Aug;152(2):225-36
references: 18811387
references: Genet Res. 1990 Jun;55(3):189-97
references: 2394377
references: Evolution. 1988 Jul;42(4):826-828
references: 28563870
references: Evolution. 1990 Mar;44(2):459-464
references: 28564371
references: Evolution. 1989 May;43(3):485-503
references: 28568400
references: Evolution. 1991 May;45(3):764-769
references: 28568817
references: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Dec 10;93(25):14279-86
references: 8962039