Information from the Internet and the doctor-patient relationship: the patient perspective--a qualitative study.
BACKGROUND
Both doctors and patients may perceive the Internet as a potential challenge to existing therapeutic relationships. Here we examine patients' views of the effect of the Internet on their relationship with doctors.


METHODS
We ran 8 disease specific focus groups of between 2 and 8 respondents comprising adult patients with diabetes mellitus, ischaemic heart disease or hepatitis C.


RESULTS
Data are presented on (i) the perceived benefits and (ii) limitations of the Internet in the context of the doctor-patient relationship, (iii) views on sharing information with doctors, and (iv) the potential of the Internet for the future. Information from the Internet was particularly valued in relation to experiential knowledge.


CONCLUSIONS
Despite evidence of increasing patient activism in seeking information and the potential to challenge the position of the doctor, the accounts here do not in any way suggest a desire to disrupt the existing balance of power, or roles, in the consultation. Patients appear to see the Internet as an additional resource to support existing and valued relationships with their doctors. Doctors therefore need not feel challenged or threatened when patients bring health information from the Internet to a consultation, rather they should see it as an attempt on the part of the patient to work with the doctor and respond positively.
Stevenson
Fiona A
FA
Department of Primary Care and Population Sciences, University College London, Hampstead Campus, Rowland Hill Street, London NW3 2PF, UK. f.stevenson@pcps.ucl.ac.uk
Kerr
Cicely
C
Murray
Elizabeth
E
Nazareth
Irwin
I
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001292:Attitude to Computers; D003920:Diabetes Mellitus / Q000628:therapy; D005260:Female; D017144:Focus Groups; D006526:Hepatitis C / Q000628:therapy; D006801:Humans; D007255:Information Services / Q000592:standards*; D020407:Internet / Q000592:standards*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017202:Myocardial Ischemia / Q000628:therapy; D010353:Patient Education as Topic / Q000379:methods*; D010358:Patient Participation / Q000523:psychology*; D017060:Patient Satisfaction / Q000208:ethnology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D006113:United Kingdom; D014584:User-Computer Interface
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Nov;59(9):1795-806
15312915
BMJ. 2004 Mar 6;328(7439):564
15001506
J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11 Suppl 1:32-4
16035986
Med J Aust. 2005 Aug 15;183(4):197-200
16097920
Sociol Health Illn. 2005 Nov;27(7):972-92
16313525
J Health Psychol. 2006 Mar;11(2):269-82
16464924
J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(3):e13
16954123
Intern Med J. 2006 Nov;36(11):718-23
17040358
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Dec 1;19(23):4291-7
11731511
Support Care Cancer. 2003 May;11(5):286-93
12690539
JAMA. 2003 Jul 9;290(2):259-64
12851283
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jul 28;163(14):1727-34
12885689
Sociol Health Illn. 2003 Sep;25(6):589-607
12919447
J Med Internet Res. 2003 Jul-Sep;5(3):e17
14517108
Qual Health Res. 2005 Mar;15(3):325-45
15761103