Environmental and economic evaluation of the Massachusetts Smoke-Free Workplace Law.
An environmental and economic evaluation of the smoke-free law in Massachusetts provides a broad appreciation of how a state-wide smoking ban affects the health of patrons and workers as well as the industries that are commonly concerned about the effects of smoking bans on business. The aim of this study is to evaluate environmental and economic effects of the statewide Massachusetts statewide Smoke-Free Workplace Law. Before and after the smoking ban, air quality testing was conducted in a sample (n = 27) of hospitality venues and state-wide economic changes were assessed. Compliance, in terms of patronage was measured by person-counts. Environmental outcomes were respirable suspended particles (RSP) less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5). Economic outcomes were meals tax collections, employment in the food services and drinking places and accommodations industries. On average, levels of respirable suspended particles (RSPs) less than 2.5 microns in diameter (PM2.5) decreased 93% in these venues after the Massachusetts Smoke-free Workplace Law went into effect. No statistically significant changes were observed among the economic indicators. This evaluation demonstrates that the state-wide Massachusetts law has effectively improved indoor air quality in a sample of Massachusetts venues and has not negatively affected several economic indicators.
Alpert
Hillel R
HR
Harvard School of Public Health, Division of Public Health Practice, Tobacco Research Program, 401 Park Drive, Landmark Building, Floor 3E, Boston, MA 02215, USA. halpert@hsph.harvard.edu
Carpenter
Carrie M
CM
Travers
Mark J
MJ
Connolly
Gregory N
GN
D016902:Air Pollution, Indoor / Q000032:analysis; D004784:Environmental Monitoring; D006801:Humans; D008404:Massachusetts; D016273:Occupational Exposure / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000517:prevention & control; D052638:Particulate Matter / Q000032:analysis; D011633:Public Facilities / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D012147:Restaurants / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D012907:Smoking / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D000074606:Smoking Prevention; D013660:Taxes; D014028:Tobacco Smoke Pollution / Q000191:economics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000517:prevention & control*; D017132:Workplace / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*
D052638:Particulate Matter; D014028:Tobacco Smoke Pollution
Tob Control. 2003 Dec;12(4):411-3
14660778
J Public Health Manag Pract. 1999 Jan;5(1):vi-ix
10345506
Tob Control. 2004 Sep;13(3):219-21
15333875
Int J Cancer. 1981 Jan 15;27(1):1-4
7251227
Am J Prev Med. 2005 May;28(4):331-7
15831337
Tob Control. 2003 Jun;12(2):221-6
12773735
Science. 1980 May 2;208(4443):464-72
7367873
JAMA. 1991 Oct 16;266(15):2110-7
1920699
JAMA. 1993 Jul 28;270(4):490-3
8320789
JAMA. 1993 Jul 28;270(4):479-86
8320788
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2004 Nov 12;53(44):1038-41
15538318
Tob Control. 1997 Autumn;6(3):164-6
9396094
BMJ. 2004 Apr 24;328(7446):977-80
15066887
Tob Control. 2003 Mar;12(1):13-20
12612356
Tob Control. 2002 Jun;11(2):94-104
12034999
Am J Public Health. 1994 Jul;84(7):1081-5
8017529
Tob Control. 2005 Feb;14(1):10-2
15735294
Tob Control. 2002 Jun;11 Suppl 2:ii38-42
12034980
Tob Control. 2003 Sep;12(3):333-8
12958397
JAMA. 1998 Dec 9;280(22):1909-14
9851475
J Occup Environ Med. 2004 Sep;46(9):887-905
15354053