Preimplantation sex selection demand and preferences among infertility patients in Midwestern United States.
OBJECTIVE
To determine the demand and preferences of infertility patients for sex selection for nonmedical reasons, and to investigate the relation between these choices and their demographic and socioeconomic characteristics.


METHODS
A cross-sectional, self-administered survey by mail was conducted at a University hospital-based fertility center of 1,350 consecutive women who presented for infertility care, to assess patient demand and preferences for sex selection.


RESULTS
Of respondents, 49% wanted to select the sex of their next child for no added cost. Of these patients, 56% had no living children and 37% had children all of one sex. After adjustment for observed predictors of gender preference, we found a significant preference for a female child among women who had only sons, had more living children, or were single. Nulliparous women did not significantly prefer one sex over the other. Among parous women, those with only daughters significantly desired to select a male child, whereas those with sons significantly desired to select a female child.


CONCLUSIONS
There is significant demand among infertility patients for preimplantation sex selection, with a significant portion of this demand coming from patients who do not have any children or have children all of one sex.
Missmer
Stacey A
SA
Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Jain
Tarun
T
D000328:Adult; D001290:Attitude; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007247:Infertility, Female / Q000523:psychology*; D015146:Midwestern United States; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D012743:Sex Preselection; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
Hum Reprod. 1999 Apr;14(4):868-70
10221209
Hum Reprod. 1998 Sep;13(9):2367-70
9806249
Reprod Biomed Online. 2005 Mar;10(3):310-9
15820035
Fertil Steril. 2006 Feb;85(2):468-73
16595229
Fertil Steril. 2001 May;75(5):861-4
11334894
Hum Reprod. 2002 Jan;17(1):233-46
11756394
BMJ. 2002 May 25;324(7348):1233
12028966
Fertil Steril. 2002 Sep;78(3):463
12215317
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002 Sep;19(9):400-10
12408533
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2002 Sep;19(9):411-6
12408534
N Y Times Web. 2003 Oct 17;:A18
14610771
BMJ. 2003 Dec 6;327(7427):1297-8
14656808
Newsweek. 2004 Jan 26;143(4):44-52
14959533
Lancet. 1989 Feb 18;1(8634):347-9
2464730
Am J Public Health. 1989 Mar;79(3):340-9
2916724
Nature. 1990 Apr 19;344(6268):768-70
2330030
Hum Reprod. 1993 Oct;8(10):1733-9
8300839
Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1996 Aug;103(8):784-8
8760708
Hum Reprod. 1998 Feb;13(2):308-12
9557828
Fertil Steril. 2005 Mar;83(3):649-58
15749494