title: Detecting asymmetries in balance control with system identification: first experimental results from Parkinson patients.
abstract: Cognitive processes can influence balance in various ways, but not all changes in postural performance can easily be identified with the naked clinical eye. Various studies have shown that dynamic posturography is able to detect more subtle changes in balance control. For patients with Parkinson's disease (which is typically an asymmetric disease), changes in the symmetry of balance control might provide a sensitive measure of cognitive influences on balance. Here, we describe a new posturography technique that combines dynamic platform perturbations with system identification techniques to detect such asymmetries in balance control of two patients with Parkinson's disease. Results were compared to those of six healthy controls. Our pilot data show clear asymmetries in dynamic balance control, even though patients themselves were not aware of this and had no subjective problems with stability or standing. We also found asymmetries in weight bearing, but the asymmetries in dynamic balance contribution were larger. Finally, asymmetries in weight bearing and dynamic balance in patients were not tightly coupled as in healthy controls. Future studies could incorporate this approach when examining the influence of mental decline on postural regulation.
authors: Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. h.vanderkooij@utwente.nl
authors: H
authors: H
authors: van der Kooij
authors: E H F
authors: EH
authors: van Asseldonk
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Geelen
authors: J P P
authors: JP
authors: van Vugt
authors: B R
authors: BR
authors: Bloem
mesh_terms: D007839:Functional Laterality / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007866:Leg / Q000503:physiopathology; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009068:Movement; D010300:Parkinson Disease / Q000503:physiopathology*; D010865:Pilot Projects; D004856:Postural Balance; D011187:Posture
references: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992 Mar;55(3):181-4
references: 1564476
references: Ann Neurol. 2005 May;57(5):656-63
references: 15852404
references: Neurosci Lett. 1995 Sep 8;197(2):133-6
references: 8552278
references: Mov Disord. 2002 Jan;17(1):191-4
references: 11835462
references: Lancet Neurol. 2006 Sep;5(9):796-802
references: 16914408
references: J Neurol Sci. 2006 Oct 25;248(1-2):196-204
references: 16806270
references: J Biomech. 1995 Nov;28(11):1369-76
references: 8522549
references: Exp Brain Res. 2003 Mar;149(2):187-94
references: 12610686
references: J Neurol Sci. 1990 Aug;98(1):91-7
references: 2230833
references: J Neurophysiol. 1996 Dec;76(6):3994-4008
references: 8985895
references: Mov Disord. 2007 Mar 15;22(4):451-60; quiz 600
references: 17133526
references: Scand J Rehabil Med. 1992;24(2):83-90
references: 1604266
references: J Neurosci Methods. 2005 Jun 30;145(1-2):175-203
references: 15922036
references: Exp Neurol. 2006 Oct;201(2):441-51
references: 16814283
references: Lancet. 2004 May 29;363(9423):1783-93
references: 15172778
references: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002 Sep;73(3):267-74
references: 12185157
references: Mov Disord. 2003 Jun;18(6):652-8
references: 12784268