Sterile surgical technique for shunt placement reduces the shunt infection rate in children: preliminary analysis of a prospective protocol in 115 consecutive procedures.
OBJECTIVE
The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the rigid application of a sterile protocol for shunt placement was applicable on a routine basis and allowed the reduction of shunt infections (SI) in children.


METHODS
Since 2001, a rigid sterile protocol for shunt placement in children using neither antibiotic-impregnated catheters nor laminar airflow was prospectively applied at Erasme Hospital, Brussels, Belgium. For assessing the protocol efficacy before continuation, we preliminarily analyzed the results of the first 100 operated children (43 females, 57 males, 49 aged <12 months; 115 consecutive shunt placement/revision procedures). All procedures were performed by the same senior surgeon, one assistant, one circulating nurse, one anesthesiologist. The sterile protocol was rigidly imposed to these four staff members: uniformed surgical technique; limited implant and skin edge manipulation; minimized human circulation in the room; scheduling surgery as first morning operation; avoiding postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak; double gloving; procedures of less than 30-min duration; systemic antibiotics prophylaxis. We analyzed separately: (1) children carrying an increased risk of SI (n = 38) due to preoperative external ventricular drainage, CSF leak, meningitis, glucocorticoids, chemotherapy; (2) children aged <12 months; (3) procedures for shunt revision.


RESULTS
Errors in protocol application were recorded in 71/115 procedures. They were mainly done by non-surgical staff, decreased with time and were medically justified in some young children. Surprisingly, no SI occurred (follow-up, 4 to 70 months). One child developed an appendicitis with peritonitis (Streptococcus faecalis) after 6 months. No SI was found. After peritonitis was cured, shunt reinsertion was uneventful.


CONCLUSIONS
These preliminary results suggest that a uniform and drastic sterile surgical technique for shunt placement: (1) can be rigidly applied on a routine basis; (2) can lower the early SI rate below 1%; (3) might have a stronger impact to reduce SI than using antibiotic-impregnated catheters and optimizing the operative environment such as using laminar airflow and reducing the non-surgical staff. This last issue will be evaluated further in the present ongoing protocol.
Pirotte
Benoit J M
BJ
Department of Neurosurgery, ERASME Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 808 route de Lennik, 1070 Brussels, Belgium. bpirotte@ulb.ac.be
Lubansu
Alphonse
A
Bruneau
Michael
M
Loqa
Chakir
C
Van Cutsem
Nathalie
N
Brotchi
Jacques
J
D000293:Adolescent; D001207:Asepsis / Q000379:methods*; D002557:Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunts / Q000009:adverse effects*; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D005932:Gloves, Surgical / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D008297:Male; D019635:Neurosurgical Procedures / Q000379:methods*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D016459:Prosthesis-Related Infections / Q000517:prevention & control*; D013530:Surgical Wound Infection / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control*
Pediatr Neurosurg. 2003 Dec;39(6):285-90
14734861
J Neurosurg. 2000 Jan;92(1):31-8
10616079
Infection. 1993 Mar-Apr;21(2):89-92
8491526
J Biomed Mater Res A. 2007 Jun 1;81(3):705-9
17187384
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2000 Apr;6(4):202-6
11168108
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2006 Aug 1;51(1):16-24
16806854
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2002 Dec;12 Suppl 1:S6-11
12541207
Neurosurgery. 2006 May;58(5):930-5; discussion 930-5
16639329
J Neurosurg. 2004 May;100(5 Suppl Pediatrics):442-6
15287452
J Neurosurg. 2006 Sep;105(3 Suppl):177-81
16970229
J Neurosurg. 2001 Feb;94(2):195-201
11213954
East Afr Med J. 2000 Jul;77(7):386-90
12862159
J Neurosurg. 2006 Sep;105(3 Suppl):165-8
16970227
Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2007 Mar;65(1):118-23
17420840
J Neurosurg. 2007 Jan;106(1 Suppl):15-9
17233307
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2006 Nov;7(6):586-8
17006384
Pediatr Neurosurg. 1999 May;30(5):253-7
10461072
J Neurosurg. 2006 Aug;105(2):242-7
17219829
J Neurosurg. 2003 Nov;99(5):831-9
14609161
J Neurosurg. 1992 Dec;77(6):875-80
1432129
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004 Jan;75(1):87-91
14707314
Pediatr Neurosurg. 2003 Jan;38(1):34-40
12476025
Can J Neurol Sci. 1993 May;20(2):118-22
8334572
J Neurosurg. 2006 Aug;105(2):320-4
17219841
BMC Infect Dis. 2006 Mar 08;6:43
16524475
Pediatr Neurosurg. 2005 May-Jun;41(3):131-6
15995329
J Neurosurg. 2006 Dec;105(6):869-72
17405257
Childs Nerv Syst. 2007 Aug;23(8):867-71
17387486
Neurosurgery. 1993 Nov;33(5):858-62
8264883
Childs Nerv Syst. 2007 Jul;23(7):773-7
17285349
Childs Nerv Syst. 2007 Mar;23(3):289-95
17106749
Childs Nerv Syst. 1987;3(2):106-9
3621226
Childs Nerv Syst. 2005 Jan;21(1):56-61
15480705
Surg Neurol. 2004 Aug;62(2):142-50; discussion 150
15261509
J Neurosurg. 2006 Jan;104(1 Suppl):5-8
16509473
Childs Nerv Syst. 2006 Nov;22(11):1465-71
16708249
Childs Nerv Syst. 2006 Jul;22(7):692-7
16534646
South Med J. 2006 Oct;99(10):1127-9
17100035
Neurosurgery. 2006 Apr;58(4):657-65; discussion 657-65
16575329
J Neurosurg. 2005 Aug;103(2 Suppl):131-6
16370278
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jul 19;(3):CD005365
16856095
Childs Nerv Syst. 1997 Nov-Dec;13(11-12):584-7
9454973