Gene expression studies of developing bovine longissimus muscle from two different beef cattle breeds.
BACKGROUND
The muscle fiber number and fiber composition of muscle is largely determined during prenatal development. In order to discover genes that are involved in determining adult muscle phenotypes, we studied the gene expression profile of developing fetal bovine longissimus muscle from animals with two different genetic backgrounds using a bovine cDNA microarray. Fetal longissimus muscle was sampled at 4 stages of myogenesis and muscle maturation: primary myogenesis (d 60), secondary myogenesis (d 135), as well as beginning (d 195) and final stages (birth) of functional differentiation of muscle fibers. All fetuses and newborns (total n = 24) were from Hereford dams and crossed with either Wagyu (high intramuscular fat) or Piedmontese (GDF8 mutant) sires, genotypes that vary markedly in muscle and compositional characteristics later in postnatal life.


RESULTS
We obtained expression profiles of three individuals for each time point and genotype to allow comparisons across time and between sire breeds. Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR analysis of RNA from developing longissimus muscle was able to validate the differential expression patterns observed for a selection of differentially expressed genes, with one exception. We detected large-scale changes in temporal gene expression between the four developmental stages in genes coding for extracellular matrix and for muscle fiber structural and metabolic proteins. FSTL1 and IGFBP5 were two genes implicated in growth and differentiation that showed developmentally regulated expression levels in fetal muscle. An abundantly expressed gene with no functional annotation was found to be developmentally regulated in the same manner as muscle structural proteins. We also observed differences in gene expression profiles between the two different sire breeds. Wagyu-sired calves showed higher expression of fatty acid binding protein 5 (FABP5) RNA at birth. The developing longissimus muscle of fetuses carrying the Piedmontese mutation shows an emphasis on glycolytic muscle biochemistry and a large-scale up-regulation of the translational machinery at birth. We also document evidence for timing differences in differentiation events between the two breeds.


CONCLUSIONS
Taken together, these findings provide a detailed description of molecular events accompanying skeletal muscle differentiation in the bovine, as well as gene expression differences that may underpin the phenotype differences between the two breeds. In addition, this study has highlighted a non-coding RNA, which is abundantly expressed and developmentally regulated in bovine fetal muscle.
Lehnert
Sigrid A
SA
Cooperative Research Centre for Cattle and Beef Quality, Australia. sigrid.lehnert@csiro.au
Reverter
Antonio
A
Byrne
Keren A
KA
Wang
Yonghong
Y
Nattrass
Greg S
GS
Hudson
Nicholas J
NJ
Greenwood
Paul L
PL
D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle / Q000196:embryology* / Q000235:genetics; D003433:Crosses, Genetic; D018076:DNA, Complementary; D004622:Embryo, Mammalian; D005260:Female; D020869:Gene Expression Profiling; D018507:Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental; D008297:Male; D024510:Muscle Development / Q000235:genetics*; D009124:Muscle Proteins / Q000235:genetics*; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000196:embryology*; D020411:Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis; D020133:Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction; D013045:Species Specificity
D018076:DNA, Complementary; D009124:Muscle Proteins
Biol Reprod. 1998 Aug;59(2):321-5
9687302
J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 2005;26(2-3):157-65
15999225
Dev Biol. 1996 Sep 15;178(2):343-62
8812134
Anim Genet. 2003 Dec;34(6):438-44
14687074
Mol Cell. 2002 Mar;9(3):587-600
11931766
Reprod Nutr Dev. 1993;33(1):25-41
8447941
Bioinformatics. 2006 Oct 1;22(19):2396-404
16864591
Zentralbl Veterinarmed A. 1974 Jul;21(7):603-10
4213027
J Biochem. 2003 Jun;133(6):745-56
12869531
J Anim Sci. 1995 Nov;73(11):3325-32
8586591
Nat Biotechnol. 2002 Jul;20(7):738-42
12089562
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Feb 09;34(3):996-1014
16473852
Mamm Genome. 2004 Oct;15(10):819-27
15520884
J Cell Physiol. 2006 Jan;206(1):264-72
16110474
J Anim Sci. 2006 Jan;84(1):1-10
16361485
Nat Genet. 1997 Sep;17(1):71-4
9288100
Bioinformatics. 2006 Jul 1;22(13):1608-15
16632494
Anim Genet. 2006 Aug;37(4):400-2
16879357
Funct Integr Genomics. 2006 Jul;6(3):235-49
16470362
Growth Dev Aging. 1991 Fall;55(3):151-60
1837286
FASEB J. 2006 Mar;20(3):580-2
16423875
Cells Tissues Organs. 2002;171(2-3):199-214
12097842
Mol Cell Biol. 2002 Jul;22(14):5114-27
12077340
Anat Embryol (Berl). 1981;162(4):403-17
7347494
Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2001 Dec;131(1):21-9
11733163
J Cell Sci. 2004 Apr 1;117(Pt 9):1737-46
15075235
BMC Genomics. 2007 Feb 01;8:39
17270048
J Cell Biol. 1996 May;133(3):683-93
8636241
J Anim Sci. 2004 Dec;82(12):3430-9
15537761
Reprod Nutr Dev. 2002 Sep-Oct;42(5):415-31
12537254
Anat Histol Embryol. 1978 Sep;7(3):193-205
152066
Genome Biol. 2003;4(10):R70
14519205
J Exp Biol. 2002 Aug;205(Pt 15):2275-85
12110661
Reprod Nutr Dev. 1999 Sep-Dec;39(5-6):637-55
10619171
J Mol Biol. 1990 Oct 5;215(3):403-10
2231712
BMC Genomics. 2007 Mar 01;8:63
17331240