Tonometer prism sterilisation: a local and UK national survey.
OBJECTIVE
First to audit local adherence to a protocol of use of an alcohol wipe for each tonometry, and secondly to assess current practice nationally in the UK.


METHODS
The audit was carried out at two units: The West Kent Eye Centre at the Princess Royal University Hospital (Orpington, UK) and Queen Mary's Hospital (Sidcup, UK). The standard set for this audit was 100% sterilisation. During a 1-week period in November 2005, the number of alcohol wipes was counted in each consultation room after outpatient clinics, with the doctors being assessed blind to the survey. The number of Goldman applanation tonometry intra-ocular pressures recorded by each clinician was counted by inspection of the medical records of patients seen. Secondly, departments listed in the UK Directory of Training Posts were contacted by telephone and the senior nurse was interviewed. They were asked directly about their department's tonometer prism sterilisation and management.


RESULTS
The local audit showed only 54% of tonometry measurements were associated with sterilisation using an alcohol-impregnated wipe. The national survey included 140 of the 152 UK training departments. Thirty-three (23.6%) departments used disposable tonometer prisms routinely. The remaining 107 (76.4%) used non-disposable prisms. Eighty-five (60.7%) departments provided sodium hypochlorite for prism sterilisation, with 69 (81.2%) of these departments providing more than one prism/clinician to allow full exposure to the disinfectant. Twenty-two (15.7%) departments used alcohol wipes. Only 8 (7.5%) of the 107 departments using non-disposable prisms tracked these prisms, despite Royal College of Ophthalmologists guidelines that they should be. These same 8 (7.5%) departments replaced the non-disposable prisms as per manufacturer guidelines. 19.3% of charge nurses were aware of a policy for tonometry in patients with, or at risk of, prion disease.


CONCLUSIONS
This study highlights that sterilisation of tonometer prisms was inconsistent in a local audit. Nationally, practices were varied. The majority of ophthalmology departments continued to use non-disposable tonometer prisms, but few seemed aware of the Royal College of Ophthalmologists' recommendation that disposable prisms are used in patients at risk of prion disease, and few track tonometer heads or replace them according to manufacturers guidelines. Use of disposable tonometer prisms would seem to reduce concerns about sterilisation, as well as prevent spread of common pathogens.
Chandra
Aman
A
West Kent Eye Centre, Princess Royal University Hospital, Farnborough, Kent BR6 8ND, UK.
Barsam
Allon
A
Hammond
Christopher J
CJ
D015817:Eye Infections / Q000517:prevention & control*; D019983:Guideline Adherence / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D006801:Humans; D008365:Manometry / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D016459:Prosthesis-Related Infections / Q000517:prevention & control*; D013242:Sterilization / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006113:United Kingdom