title: Do capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) use tokens as symbols?
abstract: In the absence of language, the comprehension of symbols is difficult to demonstrate. Tokens can be considered symbols since they arbitrarily stand for something else without having any iconic relation to their referent. We assessed whether capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella) can use tokens as symbols to represent and combine quantities. Our paradigm involved choices between various combinations of tokens A and B, worth one and three rewards, respectively. Pay-off maximization required the assessment of the value of each offer by (i) estimating token numerousness, (ii) representing what each token stands for and (iii) making simple computations. When one token B was presented against one to five tokens A (experiment 1), four out of ten capuchins relied on a flexible strategy that allowed to maximize their pay-off, i.e. they preferred one token B against one and two tokens A, and they preferred four or five tokens A against one token B. Moreover, when two tokens B were presented against three to six tokens A (experiment 2), two out of six capuchins performed summation over representation of quantities. These findings suggest that capuchins can use tokens as symbols to flexibly combine quantities.
authors: Unit of Cognitive Primatology and Primate Center, Institute of Cognitive Sciences and Technologies, CNR, Rome, Italy. elsa.addessi@istc.cnr.it
authors: E
authors: E
authors: Addessi
authors: L
authors: L
authors: Crescimbene
authors: E
authors: E
authors: Visalberghi
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D002428:Cebus / Q000502:physiology*; D002755:Choice Behavior; D005260:Female; D007858:Learning; D008297:Male; D012201:Reward; D012919:Social Behavior
references: Primates. 2005 Jul;46(3):173-82
references: 15824938
references: Anim Cogn. 2008 Jan;11(1):43-57
references: 17443355
references: Science. 1980 Nov 21;210(4472):922-5
references: 7434008
references: Science. 1956 Oct 12;124(3224):679-80
references: 17800891
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Jul;31(3):351-62
references: 16045389
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1997 Jul;23(3):325-39
references: 9206027
references: J Comp Psychol. 2001 Sep;115(3):248-57
references: 11594494
references: Cognition. 2005 Oct;97(3):315-25
references: 16260264
references: Anim Cogn. 1998 Oct;1(2):101-6
references: 24399274
references: Anim Cogn. 2008 Apr;11(2):275-82
references: 17901990
references: J Comp Psychol. 2000 Jun;114(2):136-47
references: 10890585
references: Anim Cogn. 2001 Nov;4(3-4):213-21
references: 24777511
references: Folia Primatol (Basel). 2004 Sep-Oct;75(5):317-30
references: 15486443
references: J Comp Psychol. 2004 Dec;118(4):403-12
references: 15584777
references: J Comp Psychol. 2006 Nov;120(4):416-26
references: 17115863
references: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1995 Jan;21(1):82-6
references: 7844508