title: Did you witness demonic possession? A response time analysis of the relationship between event plausibility and autobiographical beliefs.
abstract: This study tested the hypothesis that the search for information pertinent to answering the question "Did event x happen to you?" is preceded by a preliminary plausibility assessment, the outcome of which affects the amount of effort invested in the search. Undergraduate students were asked to assess the plausibility of six events and subsequently to rate their belief that each event had happened to them before the age of 6. Unknown to them, response times (RTs) for answering the belief questions were also recorded. RTs for making belief judgments were more highly correlated with plausibility than with belief, and were significantly associated with plausibility even when belief ratings were controlled. As predicted, RTs were very short when the event was deemed highly implausible and increased sharply if the event was deemed at least somewhat plausible; significant but less pronounced increases in RTs followed as plausibility increased further.
authors: University of Plymouth, Plymouth, England. g.mazzoni@hull.ac.uk
authors: Gilana
authors: G
authors: Mazzoni
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001325:Autobiographies as Topic; D003469:Culture; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010268:Parapsychology; D011930:Reaction Time; D012069:Religion and Psychology
references: Mem Cognit. 1981 Jul;9(4):434-43
references: 7278633
references: Psychol Sci. 2003 Mar;14(2):186-8
references: 12661683
references: Psychol Rev. 1993 Jan;100(1):3-22
references: 8426880
references: J Exp Psychol Appl. 2001 Mar;7(1):51-9
references: 11577619
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1997 Nov;23(6):1378-93
references: 9372606
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 1996 Jun;3(2):208-14
references: 24213869
references: Clin Psychol Rev. 2005 Nov;25(7):917-34
references: 16084632
references: Psychol Rev. 1996 Jul;103(3):490-517
references: 8759045
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2002 Sep;9(3):597-603
references: 12412902
references: Mem Cognit. 2006 Dec;34(8):1628-35
references: 17489289