Is bacterial persistence a social trait?
The ability of bacteria to evolve resistance to antibiotics has been much reported in recent years. It is less well-known that within populations of bacteria there are cells which are resistant due to a non-inherited phenotypic switch to a slow-growing state. Although such 'persister' cells are receiving increasing attention, the evolutionary forces involved have been relatively ignored. Persistence has a direct benefit to cells because it allows survival during catastrophes-a form of bet-hedging. However, persistence can also provide an indirect benefit to other individuals, because the reduced growth rate can reduce competition for limiting resources. This raises the possibility that persistence is a social trait, which can be influenced by kin selection. We develop a theoretical model to investigate the social consequences of persistence. We predict that selection for persistence is increased when: (a) cells are related (e.g. a single, clonal lineage); and (b) resources are scarce. Our model allows us to predict how the level of persistence should vary with time, across populations, in response to intervention strategies and the level of competition. More generally, our results clarify the links between persistence and other bet-hedging or social behaviours.
Gardner
Andy
A
St John's College, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom. andy.gardner@ed.ac.uk
West
Stuart A
SA
Griffin
Ashleigh S
AS
D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents / Q000494:pharmacology; D001419:Bacteria / Q000187:drug effects / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D005075:Biological Evolution; D024881:Drug Resistance, Bacterial / Q000502:physiology; D008954:Models, Biological; D011157:Population Dynamics; D013269:Stochastic Processes
D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents
Science. 2004 Sep 10;305(5690):1622-5
15308767
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2004 Jan 15;230(1):13-8
14734160
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Aug;4(8):577-87
16845428
J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):1-16
5875341
Curr Biol. 2001 Nov 13;11(22):1810-4
11719226
Science. 2002 Apr 5;296(5565):72-5
11935015
Genetics. 2005 Apr;169(4):1807-14
15687275
Q Rev Biol. 1996 Mar;71(1):37-78
8919665
Nature. 2000 Apr 6;404(6778):555-6
10766222
J Evol Biol. 2007 Mar;20(2):415-32
17305808
Nature. 1970 Dec 19;228(5277):1218-20
4395095
Annu Rev Entomol. 2006;51:581-608
16332224
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2000 Sep;64(3):503-14
10974124
EMBO Rep. 2004 May;5(5):470-6
15184977
J Theor Biol. 1998 Sep 21;194(2):195-204
9778433
J Evol Biol. 2006 Sep;19(5):1707-16
16911000
Trends Ecol Evol. 1989 Feb;4(2):41-4
21227310
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2007 Jan;5(1):48-56
17143318
Mol Microbiol. 2006 Aug;61(3):560-3
16879638
PLoS Biol. 2006 Sep;4(9):e299
16968138
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Apr;4(4):249-58
16501584
J Appl Microbiol. 2003;95(6):1261-7
14633000
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Jul;4(7):556-62
16778840
Science. 2004 Sep 10;305(5690):1578-9
15361616
Nature. 2004 Aug 26;430(7003):1024-7
15329720
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Aug;4(8):597-607
16845430
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2006 Feb;4(2):113-20
16415927
Nature. 2006 May 18;441(7091):300-2
16710410
Am Nat. 2006 Aug;168(2):E53-71
16874623
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 Apr;49(4):1483-94
15793130
J Bacteriol. 1944 Oct;48(4):393-9
16560845
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 May;29(5):797-802
3089141
Annu Rev Microbiol. 1998;52:81-104
9891794
Mol Microbiol. 2006 Aug;61(3):564-72
16879639
J Exp Med. 1949 Dec;90(6):595-607
15394076