title: The value of routine histopathological examination of appendicectomy specimens.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Appendicectomy specimens removed from patients with suspected acute appendicitis often appear macroscopically normal but histopathological analysis of these cases may reveal a more sinister underlying pathology. We evaluated histopathological reports of 1225 appendicectomy specimens at the Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital (NNUH) over the past three years.
  
  
  METHODS
  Histopathology reports for all appendices analysed at the NNUH between March 2003 and March 2006 were reviewed by examination of the case notes. The analysis focussed on the confirmation of acute appendicitis, incidental unexpected incidental findings other than inflammation, whether these abnormalities were suspected on gross examination at the time of surgery, and the effect on patient management and prognosis.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The histopathology reports disclosed a variety of abnormal incidental lesions. Of the 1225 specimens, 46 (3.75%) revealed abnormal diagnoses other than inflammatory changes. Twenty-four (1.96%) of these were clinically significant and affected further patient management. Only two of these (0.16%) were suspected on macroscopic examination intra-operatively.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Twenty-four of the 1225 specimens (1.96%) had an impact on patient management or outcome and were not suspected on macroscopic examination at the time of surgery. These would have been missed had the specimens not been examined microscopically. The intra-operative diagnosis of the surgeon is therefore unreliable in detecting abnormalities of the appendix. This study supports the sending of all appendicectomy specimens for routine histopathological examination.
authors: Department of General Surgery, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospital NHS Trust, Norwich, England, UK. aej22@dr.com
authors: Alun E
authors: AE
authors: Jones
authors: Alexander W
authors: AW
authors: Phillips
authors: John R
authors: JR
authors: Jarvis
authors: Kevin
authors: K
authors: Sargen
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001062:Appendectomy / Q000379:methods*; D001064:Appendicitis / Q000209:etiology / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D001065:Appendix / Q000473:pathology*; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D007432:Intraoperative Period; D010535:Laparoscopy; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012189:Retrospective Studies
references: Surgery. 1992 Mar;111(3):244-50
references: 1542852
references: Ann Emerg Med. 1991 Jan;20(1):45-50
references: 1984727
references: Int J Epidemiol. 1994 Feb;23(1):155-60
references: 8194912
references: J Emerg Med. 1995 Jan-Feb;13(1):1-8
references: 7782616
references: Br J Surg. 1995 Mar;82(3):299-306
references: 7795991
references: Dis Colon Rectum. 1995 Aug;38(8):848-52
references: 7634979
references: Cancer. 1997 Feb 15;79(4):813-29
references: 9024720
references: Dis Colon Rectum. 1998 Jan;41(1):75-80
references: 9510314
references: Br J Surg. 2006 Mar;93(3):362-8
references: 16470713
references: J Gastroenterol. 2006 Aug;41(8):745-9
references: 16988762
references: Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2001 Jun;125(6):759-64
references: 11371227
references: J Clin Pathol. 1987 Apr;40(4):429-33
references: 3584486
references: Age Ageing. 1987 Jul;16(4):256-60
references: 3630850
references: Dis Colon Rectum. 1989 Oct;32(10):855-9
references: 2676422
references: Cancer. 1968 Feb;21(2):270-8
references: 4952505
references: Pediatr Emerg Care. 1993 Feb;9(1):1-3
references: 8488136