Sensorimotor experience enhances automatic imitation of robotic action.
Recent research in cognitive neuroscience has found that observation of human actions activates the 'mirror system' and provokes automatic imitation to a greater extent than observation of non-biological movements. The present study investigated whether this human bias depends primarily on phylogenetic or ontogenetic factors by examining the effects of sensorimotor experience on automatic imitation of non-biological robotic, stimuli. Automatic imitation of human and robotic action stimuli was assessed before and after training. During these test sessions, participants were required to execute a pre-specified response (e.g. to open their hand) while observing a human or robotic hand making a compatible (opening) or incompatible (closing) movement. During training, participants executed opening and closing hand actions while observing compatible (group CT) or incompatible movements (group IT) of a robotic hand. Compatible, but not incompatible, training increased automatic imitation of robotic stimuli (speed of responding on compatible trials, compared with incompatible trials) and abolished the human bias observed at pre-test. These findings suggest that the development of the mirror system depends on sensorimotor experience, and that, in our species, it is biased in favour of human action stimuli because these are more abundant than non-biological action stimuli in typical developmental environments.
Press
Clare
C
Department of Psychology, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AP, UK. c.press@ucl.ac.uk
Gillmeister
Helge
H
Heyes
Cecilia
C
D000328:Adult; D006225:Hand / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D012371:Robotics
Trends Cogn Sci. 2001 Jun 1;5(6):253-261
11390296
Neuroimage. 2004 Sep;23(1):187-92
15325365
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Apr 29;100(9):5497-502
12682281
Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Oct;9(10):489-95
16126449
Trends Cogn Sci. 1998 Dec 1;2(12):493-501
21227300
Neuroimage. 2006 Jul 1;31(3):1257-67
16530429
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Dec;25(3):632-40
16344220
Cereb Cortex. 2005 Aug;15(8):1243-9
15616133
Eur J Neurosci. 2001 Jan;13(2):400-4
11168545
Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Oct;20(8):2193-202
15450099
Eur J Neurosci. 2006 Oct;24(8):2415-9
17042792
Neuroimage. 2007 May 1;35(4):1674-84
17395490
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2003 Mar 29;358(1431):491-500
12689375
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Feb;17(2):212-26
15811234
Psychopathology. 2003 Jul-Aug;36(4):171-80
14504450
Neuroreport. 2000 Jan 17;11(1):109-15
10683840
Curr Biol. 2006 Oct 10;16(19):1905-10
17027486
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2005 Feb;22(2):233-40
15653296
Curr Biol. 2004 Jan 20;14(2):117-20
14738732
Psychol Bull. 1979 May;86(3):446-61
451109
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2001 Jan;106(1-2):3-22
11256338
J Sports Sci. 2007 Mar;25(5):497-517
17365538
J Cogn Neurosci. 2005 Feb;17(2):282-93
15811240
PLoS Biol. 2005 Mar;3(3):e79
15736981
Psychol Rev. 2003 Oct;110(4):713-27
14599239
Curr Biol. 2003 Mar 18;13(6):522-5
12646137