title: The influence of residual stress on the shear strength between the bone and plasma-sprayed hydroxyapatite coating.
abstract: Plasma-sprayed HA coating (HAC) 50 and 200 microm thick on Ti6Al4V cylinders was transcortically implanted in the femora of canines. Push-out testing of implant-bone interfaces showed that the HAC coating exhibited higher shear strength at 50 microm coating than 200 microm one. The plasma-sprayed HACs were exhibited compressive residual stresses and the thicker HAC exhibited higher residual stress than that of the thinner HAC. Due to the structure for 50 and 200 microm implants were the same, meaning similar cohesive strength of the lamellar splats. And, there was no difference in the physiological environment; hence the difference of the shear strength for the 50 and 200 microm-HAC implants could best be attributed to the compressive residual stress existed in the HA coating.
authors: Department of Materials and Mineral Resources Engineering, Institute of Materials Science and Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, 106, Taiwan ROC. ycyang@ntut.edu.tw
authors: Yung-Chin
authors: YC
authors: Yang
authors: Chyun-Yu
authors: CY
authors: Yang
mesh_terms: D000497:Alloys; D000818:Animals; D001842:Bone and Bones / Q000648:ultrastructure*; D020099:Coated Materials, Biocompatible / Q000737:chemistry*; D004285:Dogs; D017886:Durapatite / Q000737:chemistry*; D005269:Femur / Q000648:ultrastructure; D008954:Models, Biological; D009985:Orthopedics / Q000379:methods; D019736:Prostheses and Implants / Q000648:ultrastructure; D033081:Shear Strength; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D013499:Surface Properties; D014025:Titanium / Q000737:chemistry
chemical_list: D000497:Alloys; D020099:Coated Materials, Biocompatible; C031462:titanium alloy (TiAl6V4); D017886:Durapatite; D014025:Titanium
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987 Dec;(225):147-70
references: 2824115
references: J Biomed Mater Res. 1990 Sep;24(9):1121-49
references: 2211742
references: Biomaterials. 1998 Nov;19(22):2015-29
references: 9870753
references: Biomaterials. 1999 Jan;20(2):111-9
references: 10022780
references: Biomaterials. 1997 Mar;18(6):477-82
references: 9111951
references: Biomaterials. 2001 Jul;22(13):1827-36
references: 11396887
references: Acta Orthop Scand. 1990 Aug;61(4):299-306
references: 2402977
references: J Dent Res. 1976 Jul-Aug;55(4):708
references: 1064625
references: J Biomed Mater Res. 1993 May;27(5):575-85
references: 8314810
references: J Biomed Mater Res. 2001 Jun 15;55(4):596-602
references: 11288088
references: Biomaterials. 2000 Jul;21(13):1327-37
references: 10850926
references: J Biomed Mater Res. 1995 Jan;29(1):19-24
references: 7713954
references: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988 Jul;(232):225-43
references: 2838208
references: J Biomed Mater Res A. 2003 Dec 1;67(3):886-99
references: 14613237