title: Day-case rigid and flexible ureteroscopy.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of rigid and flexible ureteroscopy as a day-surgery procedure.
  
  
  METHODS
  All patients requiring elective ureteroscopy from March 2004 were considered for a day-surgery procedure. The standard day-surgery exclusions existed but there were no urological criteria for exclusion. A single consultant urologist performed or supervised all procedures.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 64 patients underwent 50 rigid and 14 flexible procedures. Six diagnostic ureteroscopies were performed. There was a 96% stone clearance rate. Five patients required an unplanned admission within the first 2 weeks' postoperatively. Three of these patients were admitted on the day of surgery, two for pain and one for social reasons. Two patients were admitted at 24 h and 48 h, respectively, for urinary retention.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Ureteroscopy, both rigid and flexible, is a safe procedure for the day-surgery setting. Routine use of prophylactic antibiotics, intravenous non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs resulted in an acceptable re-admission rate.
authors: Department of Urology, St Mary's Hospital, Portsmouth, UK. emma.bromwich@virgin.net
authors: E J
authors: EJ
authors: Bromwich
authors: R
authors: R
authors: Lockyer
authors: S R
authors: SR
authors: Keoghane
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000556:Ambulatory Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods*; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D006801:Humans; D007669:Kidney Calculi / Q000601:surgery*; D008875:Middle Aged; D010343:Patient Admission / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011446:Prospective Studies; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014514:Ureteral Calculi / Q000601:surgery*; D018666:Ureteroscopy / Q000379:methods*
references: J Urol. 2002 Jan;167(1):31-4
references: 11743269
references: BJU Int. 2002 Feb;89(3):181-5
references: 11856095
references: J Urol. 1997 Nov;158(5):1915-21
references: 9334635
references: J Urol. 1994 May;151(5):1185-7
references: 8158756
references: BJU Int. 2004 May;93(7):1032-4; discussion 1034-5
references: 15142158