title: Sentinel node biopsy versus elective lymph node dissection in patients with cutaneous melanoma in a Japanese population.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  In Japan, elective lymph node dissection (ELND) has been the standard treatment for patients with possible nodal melanoma. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) has now replaced ELND, not only in Japan but also worldwide. The objective of this study was to compare the interim outcomes of SNB and ELND.
  
  
  METHODS
  A retrospective study was conducted among patients with clinically node-negative disease treated at our institute with either SNB (n = 30) or ELND (n = 72).
  
  
  RESULTS
  The background was similar in the two groups. Nodal metastases were found in 40.0% of patients in the SNB group, but in only 26.4% in the ELND group (P = 0.173). The median follow-up was 31.5 months for the SNB group and 82 months for the ELND group. The incidence of locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis in the SNB group was 10.0% and 16.7%, respectively, and for the ELND group the incidence was 5.6% and 31.9%, respectively. The 3-year disease-free survival rate was similar in the two groups (P = 0.280), and the 3-year disease-free survival rates for node-positive patients were also similar in the two groups (P = 0.90), as were the 3-year disease-free survival rates for node-negative patients (P = 0.193).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This interim result in a Japanese melanoma population with clinically node-negative disease demonstrated that SNB identified more nodal micrometastases than ELND. This increase in accurate staging likely resulted from the reliable identification of the lymph node field by lymphoscintigraphy, as well as the more detailed pathologic examination of the nodes removed in SNB. It is quite reasonable to perform SNB instead of ELND in this population.
authors: Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-8638, Japan.
authors: Arata
authors: A
authors: Tsutsumida
authors: Hiroshi
authors: H
authors: Furukawa
authors: Yuhei
authors: Y
authors: Yamamoto
authors: Katsumi
authors: K
authors: Horiuchi
authors: Tetsunori
authors: T
authors: Yoshida
authors: Hidehiko
authors: H
authors: Minakawa
authors: Satoru
authors: S
authors: Fujii
authors: Naoki
authors: N
authors: Murao
authors: Hiroaki
authors: H
authors: Kuwahara
authors: Toshiyuki
authors: T
authors: Minamimoto
authors: Hirotaka
authors: H
authors: Fujioka
authors: Taisuke
authors: T
authors: Sakamoto
authors: Toyohiro
authors: T
authors: Honma
mesh_terms: D018572:Disease-Free Survival; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007564:Japan; D008197:Lymph Node Excision; D008297:Male; D008545:Melanoma / Q000473:pathology*; D008875:Middle Aged; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D011379:Prognosis; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D021701:Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy; D012878:Skin Neoplasms / Q000473:pathology*
references: J Dermatol. 1991 Oct;18(10):592-7
references: 1791239
references: Ann Surg Oncol. 1999 Jul-Aug;6(5):442-9
references: 10458681
references: Mayo Clin Proc. 1986 Sep;61(9):697-705
references: 3747613
references: Ann Surg. 1996 Sep;224(3):255-63; discussion 263-6
references: 8813254
references: Melanoma Res. 1995 Aug;5(4):255-60
references: 7496161
references: N Engl J Med. 2006 Sep 28;355(13):1307-17
references: 17005948
references: J Dermatol. 2007 Jan;34(1):31-6
references: 17204098
references: Arch Surg. 1992 Apr;127(4):392-9
references: 1558490
references: J Nucl Med. 1993 Sep;34(9):1435-40
references: 8355060
references: Cancer. 2000 Jul 15;89(2):236-41
references: 10918150
references: N Engl J Med. 1977 Sep 22;297(12):627-30
references: 895764
references: Int J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct;10(5):311-7
references: 16247657
references: J Dermatol. 2001 Jul;28(7):347-52
references: 11510501
references: J Clin Oncol. 1999 Mar;17 (3):976-83
references: 10071292
references: Ann Surg Oncol. 2004 Sep;11(9):829-36
references: 15313732
references: J Dermatol. 1994 Dec;21(12):953-9
references: 7868768