title: Prime display offset modulates negative priming only for easy-selection tasks.
abstract: Responses to probe targets that have been distractors in a prime display are slower than responses to new targets, a finding called negative priming (NP). The selective attention model, which attributes NP to lingering inhibition of the prime distractor, predicts that NP should occur only when the prime display has disappeared before the probe display is processed. The present study tested this prediction both in easy- and in difficult selection tasks. In Experiments 1, 2, and 3A, target selection was easy, and NP was observed only after prime display offset, regardless of whether offset was manipulated between or within participants. In Experiment 3B, target selection was difficult, and NP was found with and without prime display offset. Experiment 4 replicated the finding of NP without prime display offset in a difficult-selection task. A modified version of the selective attention model can explain the results of the present study. However, we also discuss the results in light of episodic retrieval theory and temporal discrimination theory.
authors: Faculty of Behavioral Sciences, Department of Psychology, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany. c.frings@mx.uni-saarland.de
authors: Christian
authors: C
authors: Frings
authors: Peter
authors: P
authors: Wühr
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D002755:Choice Behavior; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011930:Reaction Time
references: Percept Mot Skills. 1966 Dec;23(3):1211-4
references: 5972923
references: Psychol Bull. 1995 Jul;118(1):35-54
references: 7644605
references: Psychol Rev. 1998 Apr;105(2):203-29
references: 9577237
references: Can J Exp Psychol. 2001 Sep;55(3):219-30
references: 11605557
references: Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Apr;59(4):683-93
references: 16707357
references: Q J Exp Psychol A. 1985 Nov;37(4):571-90
references: 4081101
references: Mem Cognit. 1985 Jan;13(1):74-80
references: 4010517
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 1995 Jun;2(2):145-73
references: 24203653
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1997 Jun;23(3):632-50
references: 9180038
references: Exp Psychol. 2005;52(2):131-9
references: 15850160
references: Q J Exp Psychol A. 2001 May;54(2):321-43
references: 11394050