Strength statistics of adhesive contact between a fibrillar structure and a rough substrate.
Equal distribution of load among fibrils in contact with a substrate is an important characteristic of fibrillar structures used by many small animals and insects for contact and adhesion. This is in contrast with continuum systems where stress concentration dominates interfacial failure. In this work, we study how adhesion strength of a fibrillar system depends on substrate roughness and variability of the fibril structure, which are modelled using probability distributions for fibril length and fibril attachment strength. Monte Carlo simulations are carried out to determine the adhesion strength statistics where fibril length follows normal or uniform distribution and attachment strength has a power-law form. Our results indicate that the strength distribution is Gaussian (normal) for both the uniform and the normal distributions for length. However, the fibrillar structure having normally distributed lengths has higher strength and lower toughness than one having uniformly distributed lengths. Our simulations also show that an increase in the compliance of the fibrils can compensate for both the substrate roughness and the attachment strength variation. We also show that, as the number of fibrils n increases, the load-carrying efficiency of each fibril goes down. For large n, this effect is found to be small. Furthermore, this effect is compensated by the fact that the standard deviation of the adhesive strength decreases as 1/ square root n.
Porwal
Pankaj K
PK
Department of Civil Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Powai, Mumbai 400 076, India. pporwal@iitb.ac.in
Hui
Chung Yuen
CY
D000268:Adhesiveness; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D003198:Computer Simulation; D024022:Fibrillar Collagens / Q000737:chemistry*; D008954:Models, Biological; D015233:Models, Statistical; D009010:Monte Carlo Method; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D013499:Surface Properties; D013718:Tensile Strength
D024022:Fibrillar Collagens
J R Soc Interface. 2004 Nov 22;1(1):23-33
16849150
J R Soc Interface. 2007 Apr 22;4(13):271-5
17251156
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jan 11;102(2):385-9
15630086
Langmuir. 2007 Mar 27;23(7):3495-502
17315904
Integr Comp Biol. 2002 Dec;42(6):1140-5
21680398
J R Soc Interface. 2004 Nov 22;1(1):35-48
16849151
Nat Mater. 2003 Jul;2(7):461-3
12776092
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Sep 16;100(19):10603-6
12960386
J Theor Biol. 2006 Nov 7;243(1):48-53
16846614
Biol Lett. 2005 Mar 22;1(1):2-4
17148113
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 May 25;101(21):7851-6
15148400
Nature. 2000 Jun 8;405(6787):681-5
10864324
Acta Biomater. 2005 Jul;1(4):367-75
16701818
Langmuir. 2007 Mar 13;23(6):3322-32
17284057
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 26;104(26):10786-91
17581870
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 May 13;100(10):5597-600
12732735