Asexuality and the coexistence of cytotypes.
Reproductive isolation via apomixis is one way for newly created cytotypes to persist and coexist with other cytotypes. Arnica cordifolia (Asteraceae) has both triploid and tetraploid cytotypes co-occurring in many locations. The rate of apomixis in each cytotype was explored as a mechanism for the maintenance of sympatric cytotypes. Flow cytometry was used on both adults and seeds from mixed cytotype populations to estimate reproductive mode and to evaluate the relationship between cytotype frequency and reproductive success. Flowering time was surveyed to look for temporal reproductive isolation between cytotypes. Both triploids and tetraploids can be asexual. Apomixis in A. cordifolia is usually autonomous, not pseudogamous as previously thought. Sexual reproduction appears to be uncommon. The minority cytotype in each population does not produce fewer seeds, confirming that minority cytotype exclusion is unlikely to occur via reproductive disadvantage. Triploids flowered earlier than tetraploids, but with much overlap. Asexual reproduction is an important factor promoting the coexistence of cytotypes in this system. Other mechanisms maintaining populations of sympatric cytotypes are not well studied or understood and warrant further investigation.
Kao
Rebecca Hufft
RH
University of California Santa Cruz, EE Biology, EMS A316, 1156 High St., Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA.
D018650:Arnica / Q000166:cytology* / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology*; D017753:Ecosystem; D035264:Flowers; D011003:Ploidies; D012100:Reproduction, Asexual; D012639:Seeds
Arumuganathan K, Earle ED. 1991. Estimation of nuclear DNA content of plants by flow cytometry. Plant Molecular Biology 9: 229-233.
Baack EJ. 2005a. To succeed globally, disperse locally: effects of local pollen and seed dispersal on tetraploid establishment. Heredity 94: 538-546.
Baack EJ. 2005b. Ecological factors influencing tetraploid establishment in snow buttercups (Ranunculus adoneus, Ranunculaceae): Minority cytotype exclusion and barriers to triploid formation. American Journal of Botany 92: 1827-1835.
Baldwin BG, Sanderson MJ, Porter JM, Wojciechowski MF, Campbell CS, Donoghue MJ. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA - a valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 247-277.
Barker WW. 1966. Apomixis in the genus Arnica (Compositae). PhD thesis. University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Bierzychudek P. 1985. Patterns in plant parthenogenesis. Experientia (Basel) 41: 1255-1264.
Bocher TW, Larsen K. 1955. Chromosome studies on some European flowering plants. Botanisk Tidsskrift 52: 125-131.
Dawe RK. 1998. Meiotic chromosome organization and segregation in plants. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 49: 371-395.
Felber F. 1991. Establishment of a tetraploid cytotype in a diploid population: effect of relative fitness of the cytotypes. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 4: 195-207.
Felber F, Bever J. 1997. Effect of triploid fitness on the coexistence of diploids and tetraploids. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 60: 95-106.
Fowler NL, Levin DA. 1984. Ecological constraints on the establishment of a novel polyploid in competition with its diploid progenitor. American Naturalist 124: 703-711.
Gustaffson A. 1946. Apomixis in higher plants. Lund, Sweden: CWK Gleerup.
Hickman JC. 1996. The Jepson manual: higher plants of California. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press.
Husband BC, Schemske DW, Burton TL, Goodwillie C. 2002. Pollen competition as a unilateral reproductive barrier between sympatric diploid and tetraploid Chamerion angustifolium. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 269: 2565-2571.
Kao RH. 2006. The coexistence of polyploids in Arnica cordifolia (Asteraceae). PhD dissertation. University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Krahulcova A, Papouskova S, Krahulec F. 2004. Reproduction mode in the allopolyploid facultatively apomictic hawkweed Hieracium rubrum (Asteraceae, H. subgen. Pilosella). Hereditas 141: 19-30.
Levin DA. 1975. Minority cytotype exclusion in local plant populations. Taxon 24: 35-43.
Levin DA. 1983. Polyploidy and novelty in flowering plants. American Naturalist 122: 1-25.
Maguire B. 1943. A monograph of the genus Arnica. Brittonia 4: 386-510.
Matzk F, Meister A, Schubert I. 2000. An efficient screen for reproductive pathways using mature seeds of monocots and dicots. Plant Journal 21: 97-108.
Ornduff R, Mosquin T, Kyhos DW, Raven PH. 1967. Chromosome numbers in Compositae. VI. Senecioneae. II. American Journal of Botany 54: 205-213.
Ornduff R, Raven PH, Kyhos DW, Kruckeberg AR. 1963. Chromosome numbers in Compositae. III. Senecioneae. American Journal of Botany 50: 131-139.
Petit C, Bretagnolle F, Felber F. 1999. Evolutionary consequences of diploid-polyploid hybrid zones in wild species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 14: 306-311.
Rausch JH, Morgan MT. 2005. The effect of self-fertilization, inbreeding depression, and population size on autopolyploid establishment. Evolution 59: 1867-1875.
Richards AJ. 2003. Apomixis in flowering plants. Philosophical Translations of the Royal Society of London B 358: 1085-1093.
Rodriguez DJ. 1996. A model for the establishment of polyploidy in plants: viable but infertile hybrids, iteroparity, and demographic stochasticity. Journal of Theoretical Biology 180: 189-196.
Wolf SJ. 1980. Cytogeographical studies in the genus Arnica (Compositae: Senecioneae). I. American Journal of Botany 67: 300-308.
Yamauchi A, Hosokawa A, Nagata H, Shimoda M. 2004. Triploid bridge and role of parthenogenesis in the evolution of autopolyploidy. American Naturalist 164: 101-112.