title: Identification of prognostically relevant and reproducible subsets of endometrial adenocarcinoma based on clustering analysis of immunostaining data.
abstract: Panels of immunomarkers can provide greater information than single markers, but the problem of how to optimally interpret data from multiple immunomarkers is unresolved. We examined the expression profile of 12 immunomarkers in 200 endometrial carcinomas using a tissue microarray. The outcomes of groups of patients were analyzed by using the Kaplan-Meier method, using the log-rank statistic for comparison of survival curves. Correlation between clustering results and traditional prognosticators of endometrial carcinoma was examined by either Fisher's exact test or chi2-test. Multivariate analysis was performed using a proportional hazards method (Cox regression modeling). Seven of the 12 immunomarkers studied showed prognostic significance in univariate analysis (P<0.05) and 1 marker showed a trend toward significance (P=0.06). These eight markers were used in unsupervised hierarchical clustering of the cases, and resulted in identification of three cluster groups. There was a statistically significant difference in patient survival between these cluster groups (P=0.0001). The prognostic significance of the cluster groups was independent of tumor stage and patient age on multivariate analysis (P=0.014), but was not of independent significance when either tumor grade or cell type was added to the model. The cluster group designation was strongly correlated with tumor grade, stage, and cell type (P<0.0001 for each). Interlaboratory reproducibility of subclassification of endometrial adenocarcinoma by hierarchical clustering analysis was verified by showing highly reproducible assignment of individual cases to specific cluster groups when the immunostaining was performed, interpreted, and clustered in a second laboratory (kappa=0.79, concordance rate=89.6%). Unsupervised hierarchical clustering of immunostaining data identifies prognostically relevant subsets of endometrial adenocarcinoma. Such analysis is reproducible, showing less interobserver variability than histopathological assessment of tumor cell type or grade.
authors: Department of Pathology, King Fahad National Guard Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
authors: Abdulmohsen
authors: A
authors: Alkushi
authors: Blaise A
authors: BA
authors: Clarke
authors: Majid
authors: M
authors: Akbari
authors: Nikita
authors: N
authors: Makretsov
authors: Peter
authors: P
authors: Lim
authors: Dianne
authors: D
authors: Miller
authors: Anthony
authors: A
authors: Magliocco
authors: Andrew
authors: A
authors: Coldman
authors: Matt
authors: M
authors: van de Rijn
authors: David
authors: D
authors: Huntsman
authors: Robin
authors: R
authors: Parker
authors: C Blake
authors: CB
authors: Gilks
mesh_terms: D000230:Adenocarcinoma / Q000145:classification* / Q000378:metabolism* / Q000473:pathology; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D014408:Biomarkers, Tumor / Q000032:analysis*; D016000:Cluster Analysis; D016889:Endometrial Neoplasms / Q000145:classification* / Q000378:metabolism* / Q000473:pathology; D005260:Female; D015870:Gene Expression; D006801:Humans; D007150:Immunohistochemistry; D053208:Kaplan-Meier Estimate; D008875:Middle Aged; D015999:Multivariate Analysis; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D011379:Prognosis; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D016019:Survival Analysis; D046888:Tissue Array Analysis
chemical_list: D014408:Biomarkers, Tumor