title: Postural prioritization defines the interaction between a reaction time task and postural perturbations.
abstract: Concurrent demands for postural and cognitive control processes are now known to induce interference, e.g., information processing speed may decrease during postural adjustment. It is less clear whether postural control may, at least in many situations, take precedence over cognitive control ("postural prioritization"). The purpose of this study was to determine if postural dual-task effects are the result of a postural prioritization effect. Twelve young subjects (6 female; 24.1 +/- 4.1) performed a discrete choice reaction time (RT) task in combination with a platform perturbation. To assess the effect of postural prioritization on RT and center of pressure (COP) parameters, destabilizing perturbations were randomly interspersed with non-destabilizing perturbations. Furthermore, stimulus order and the time interval of the RT stimulus relative to the platform perturbation were manipulated. COP and RT data obtained in these manipulations were compared to single-task baseline data. The results suggested that, irrespective of the degree of threat to postural stability, postural task processes are prioritized. Furthermore, anticipation of a postural stimulus negatively affects RT. However, once a perturbation commences subsequent RTs are speeded. Postural reactions were unaffected by a concurrent RT task, however. The RT stimulus acted as a cue to initiate biomechanical adaptations for an upcoming perturbation.
authors: Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, USA. mtmuller@umich.edu
authors: Martijn L T M
authors: ML
authors: Müller
authors: Mark S
authors: MS
authors: Redfern
authors: J Richard
authors: JR
authors: Jennings
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001307:Auditory Perception; D003071:Cognition; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009068:Movement; D011187:Posture / Q000502:physiology*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D014724:Vestibular Function Tests; D014722:Vestibule, Labyrinth / Q000502:physiology; D014732:Vibration; D014796:Visual Perception
references: Exp Brain Res. 1996 Mar;108(2):315-20
references: 8815039
references: Neuroreport. 1999 Sep 29;10(14):2895-9
references: 10549793
references: Psychol Bull. 1967 Mar;67(3):202-13
references: 5341896
references: Psychol Bull. 2005 May;131(3):434-59
references: 15869340
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Jun;10(3):358-77
references: 6242412
references: Gait Posture. 2002 Aug;16(1):1-14
references: 12127181
references: Neuroreport. 2001 Nov 16;12(16):3583-7
references: 11733716
references: Gait Posture. 2002 Feb;15(1):83-93
references: 11809584
references: Neurosci Lett. 1994 Jul 4;175(1-2):13-6
references: 7970194
references: Exp Aging Res. 1993 Jan-Mar;19(1):1-13
references: 8444263
references: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002 Dec;57(12):M785-92
references: 12456737
references: J Neurophysiol. 1998 Oct;80(4):1939-50
references: 9772251
references: Exp Brain Res. 2002 Oct;146(3):315-21
references: 12232688
references: Psychol Bull. 1994 Sep;116(2):220-44
references: 7972591
references: Psychol Sci. 2001 May;12(3):230-7
references: 11437306
references: Gait Posture. 2003 Oct;18(2):11-9
references: 14654203
references: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2002 Aug;57(8):B298-303
references: 12145355
references: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1997 Jul;52(4):M232-40
references: 9224435
references: J Mot Behav. 2004 Jun;36(2):137-46
references: 15130865
references: Exp Psychol. 2004;51(1):52-8
references: 14959506
references: J Biomech. 2004 Oct;37(10):1573-81
references: 15336932
references: Exp Brain Res. 2005 Dec;167(3):433-45
references: 16041500
references: J Neurophysiol. 1989 Oct;62(4):841-53
references: 2809706