Quantitative assessment of four-dimensional computed tomography image acquisition quality.
The purpose of the present work was to describe the development and validation of a series of tests to assess the quality of four-dimensional (4D) computed-tomography (CT) imaging as it is applied to radiation treatment planning. Using a commercial respiratory motion phantom and a programmable moving platform with a CT phantom, we acquired 4D CT datasets on two commercial multislice helical CT scanners that use different approaches to 4D CT image reconstruction. Datasets were obtained as the platform moved in various patterns designed to simulate breathing. Known inserts in the phantom were contoured, and statistics were generated to evaluate properties important to radiation therapy--namely, accuracy of phase-binning, shape, volume, and CT number. Phase-binning accuracy varied by as much as 5% for a 4D procedure in which images were reconstructed and then binned, but exhibited no variation for a 4D procedure in which projections were binned before reconstruction. The magnitude of geometric distortion was found to be small for both approaches, as was the magnitude of volume error. Partial-volume effects in the direction perpendicular to the transverse planes of reconstruction affected volume accuracy, however. Computed tomography numbers were reproduced accurately, but 4D images exhibited more variation in CT number than static CT images did. Characterization of such properties can be used to better understand and optimize the various parameters that affect 4D CT image quality.
Starkschall
George
G
Departments of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Desai
Neil
N
Departments of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Balter
Peter
P
Departments of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Prado
Karl
K
Departments of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Luo
Dershan
D
Departments of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Cody
Dianna
D
Departments of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
Pan
Tinsu
T
Departments of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, U.S.A.
D016477:Artifacts; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D009068:Movement; D019047:Phantoms, Imaging; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000379:methods*; D011856:Radiographic Image Enhancement / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D011857:Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013382:Subtraction Technique; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2005 Winter;6(1):13-21
15770194
Phys Med Biol. 2003 Sep 21;48(18):3069-84
14529211
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2006 Winter;7(1):77-85
16518319
Phys Med Biol. 2004 May 21;49(10):2053-67
15214541
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Nov 1;60(3):973-80
15465216
Med Phys. 2004 Dec;31(12):3378-92
15651621
Med Phys. 2004 Feb;31(2):333-40
15000619
Phys Med Biol. 2003 Jan 7;48(1):45-62
12564500
Phys Med Biol. 2005 Dec 7;50(23):5717-29
16306663
Med Phys. 2003 Jan;30(1):88-97
12557983
Med Phys. 2005 Jul;32(7):2254-61
16121580
Med Phys. 2005 Dec;32(12):3650-60
16475764
Med Phys. 2005 Apr;32(4):874-89
15895570