Qualitative evaluation of an electronic prescribing and administration system.
OBJECTIVE
To provide a formative socio-technical evaluation of a pilot implementation of an integrated electronic prescribing, automated dispensing, barcode patient identification and electronic medication administration record (EMAR) system on one ward.


METHODS
A qualitative observational approach using discourse analysis within a socio-technical evaluation framework addressing systems functions, human perspectives and organisational context.


METHODS
Surgical ward in a teaching hospital.


METHODS
Staff on study ward and in pharmacy.


METHODS
Implementation over time of an integrated electronic prescribing, automated dispensing, barcode patient identification and EMAR system.


METHODS
Assessment of technical performance, developed attitudes to the new system, changes to delivery of care and work practices.


RESULTS
The system was successfully implemented on the ward, and remained in operation for over 2 years. Many of the technical components of the system initially showed problems, but the system evolved, with increased functionality and improved performance. Attitudes to the system in the early stages were mixed. Over time, and with experience of making the system work for them, staff attitudes changed to become more balanced and the potential benefits of the system became clearer to most. The system structured the work of staff, sometimes unexpectedly.


CONCLUSIONS
Electronic prescribing systems need to be seen as occasions for change and learning rather than as black-boxed technical solutions to identified problems. The evaluation framework allows understanding as well as hypothesis testing, and is recommended for future evaluations of electronic prescribing systems.
Barber
Nick
N
The School of Pharmacy, BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, UK. n.barber@pharmacy.ac.uk
Cornford
Tony
T
Klecun
Ela
E
D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D001292:Attitude to Computers; D016303:Clinical Pharmacy Information Systems / Q000592:standards*; D006757:Hospital Units / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006784:Hospitals, Teaching; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning; D008131:London; D050316:Medical Order Entry Systems / Q000592:standards*; D009936:Organizational Innovation; D010355:Patient Identification Systems; D010865:Pilot Projects; D019095:Point-of-Care Systems; D018511:Systems Integration
Milbank Q. 2005;83(4):691-729
16279964
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 19;348(25):2526-34
12815139
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1999 Jul-Aug;6(4):313-21
10428004
JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1197-203
15755942
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Aug;16(4):279-84
17693676
BMJ. 2004 May 15;328(7449):1197-9
15142933
Arch Intern Med. 2005 May 23;165(10):1111-6
15911723
Methods Inf Med. 2004;43(3):215-31
15227551
Int J Med Inform. 2001 Nov;64(1):39-56
11673101
Int J Med Inform. 1999 Aug;55(2):87-101
10530825
BMJ. 2000 Mar 18;320(7237):750-3
10720357