Survival of bio-inoculants on fungicides-treated seeds of wheat, pea and chickpea and subsequent effect on chickpea yield.
Survival of Mesorhizobium ciceri (SP(4)) and Azotobacter chroococcum (CBD-15 and M(4)) was tested on chickpea (Cicer arietinum) seeds treated with fungicides bavistin [methyl N-(1H-benzimidazol-2yl) carbamate] and thiram (tetramethyl-thiuram disulfide), whereas survival of phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB), Pseudomonas striata (27) and Bacillus polymyxa (H(5)) was examined on two cultivars (Arkel and BV) of pea (Pisum sativum) seeds treated with thiram. Viability of Azotobacter chroococcum (W(5)) was also examined on wheat (Triticum aestivum) seeds treated with bavistin, captan (cis-N-trichloromethyl thio-4 cyclohexane-1, 2-dicarboximide) and thiram under laboratory conditions using standard dilution and the plate count technique. All the tested strains of diazotrophs and PSB showed decline in their viable population on prolonged contact with fungicides. However, PSB showed variation in their viable population even with the cultivar. BV cultivar of pea seeds showed better recovery of viable P. striata (10.75 to 10.61 log no. of viable cells with in 0-24 hrs) in the presence of thiram, whereas the Arkel cultivar of pea resulted in better recovery of viable B. polymyxa. Azotobacter chroococcum (W(5)), a potential strain for wheat, showed better survival in the presence of bavistin, compared to thiram and captan. Higher viable population of Mesorhizobium ciceri (SP(4)) and Azotobacter chroococcum (M(4)) was recovered from chickpea seeds treated with bavistin compared to thiram. However, thiram-treated seeds resulted in a greater number of extractable Azotobacter chroococcum (CBD-15). Under field conditions, adverse effect of thiram was reflected on the performance of Mesorhizobium ciceri (SP(4)) and A. chroococcum (M(4)) strains, resulting in reduced root and shoot biomass and grain yield, compared to bavistin treated and culture inoculated treatment. CBD-15 showed better performance in the presence of thiram compared to bavistin.
Gaind
Sunita
S
Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India. skgaind105@sify.com
Rathi
Maheshwar S
MS
Kaushik
Brahma D
BD
Nain
Lata
L
Verma
Om P
OP
D001395:Azotobacter / Q000187:drug effects / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism; D001407:Bacillus / Q000187:drug effects / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism; D001562:Benzimidazoles / Q000494:pharmacology; D002215:Captan / Q000494:pharmacology; D002219:Carbamates / Q000494:pharmacology; D029863:Cicer / Q000737:chemistry / Q000382:microbiology*; D015169:Colony Count, Microbial; D005659:Fungicides, Industrial / Q000494:pharmacology*; D009586:Nitrogen Fixation / Q000187:drug effects; D018532:Pisum sativum / Q000737:chemistry / Q000382:microbiology*; D018517:Plant Roots / Q000382:microbiology*; D011549:Pseudomonas / Q000187:drug effects / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism; D012231:Rhizobium / Q000187:drug effects / Q000254:growth & development / Q000378:metabolism; D012639:Seeds / Q000187:drug effects; D012988:Soil Microbiology; D013893:Thiram / Q000494:pharmacology; D014908:Triticum / Q000737:chemistry / Q000382:microbiology*
D001562:Benzimidazoles; D002219:Carbamates; D005659:Fungicides, Industrial; D013893:Thiram; D002215:Captan; C006698:carbendazim