title: Free flight maneuvers of stalk-eyed flies: do eye-stalks affect aerial turning behavior?
abstract: The eyes of stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae) are positioned at the end of rigid peduncles projected laterally from the head. In dimorphic species the eye-stalks of males exceed the eye-stalks of females and can exceed body length. Eye-stalk length is sexually selected in males improving male reproductive success. We tested whether the long eye-stalks have a negative effect on free-flight and aerial turning behavior by analyzing the morphology and free-flight trajectories of male and female Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. At flight posture the mass-moment-of-inertia for rotation about a vertical axis was 1.49-fold higher in males. Males also showed a 5% increase in wing length compared to females. During free-flight females made larger turns than males (54 +/- 31.4 vs. 49 +/- 36.2 degrees , t test, P < 0.033) and flew faster while turning (9.4 +/- 5.45 vs. 8.4 +/- 6.17 cm s(-1), ANOVA, P < 0.021). However, turning performance of both sexes overlapped, and turn rate in males even marginally exceeded turn rate in females (733 +/- 235.3 vs. 685 +/- 282.6 deg s(-1), ANCOVA, P < 0.047). We suggest that the increase in eye-span does result in an increase in the mechanical requirements for aerial turning but that male C. dalmanni are capable of compensating for the constraint of longer eye-stalks during the range of turns observed through wingbeat kinematics and increased wing size.
authors: Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD 57069, USA. gribak@usd.edu
authors: Gal
authors: G
authors: Ribak
authors: John G
authors: JG
authors: Swallow
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D004175:Diptera / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000502:physiology*; D005123:Eye / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D005260:Female; D005426:Flight, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D009799:Ocular Physiological Phenomena; D012727:Sex Characteristics
references: J Exp Biol. 2006 Dec;209(Pt 23):4597-606
references: 17114395
references: Nature. 1998 Oct 15;395(6703):654
references: 9790186
references: Cell Tissue Res. 1983;229(3):591-610
references: 6839353
references: Integr Comp Biol. 2005 Apr;45(2):274-81
references: 21676771
references: Evolution. 2004 May;58(5):1038-46
references: 15212384
references: Nature. 2000 Jul 13;406(6792):186-8
references: 10910358
references: Integr Comp Biol. 2002 Feb;42(1):135-40
references: 21708702
references: Genet Res. 2004 Aug;84(1):27-40
references: 15663256
references: J Insect Physiol. 2004 Jan;50(1):103-8
references: 15037098
references: J Neurosci Methods. 2000 Aug 15;101(1):59-67
references: 10967362
references: J Exp Biol. 1999 Jun;202 (Pt 11):1481-90
references: 10229694
references: Mol Ecol. 2005 Oct;14(12):3787-800
references: 16202096
references: Evolution. 2001 Jul;55(7):1373-85
references: 11525461
references: J Neurobiol. 1998 Nov 15;37(3):449-68
references: 9828050
references: Science. 2003 Apr 18;300(5618):495-8
references: 12702878
references: J Exp Biol. 2002 Sep;205(Pt 18):2785-98
references: 12177144
references: J Comp Physiol B. 2000 Nov;170(7):481-7
references: 11128437
references: J Exp Biol. 1996 Aug;199(Pt 8):1711-26
references: 8708578
references: J Exp Biol. 2003 Mar;206(Pt 5):843-55
references: 12547939
references: J Exp Biol. 2006 Aug;209(Pt 16):3170-82
references: 16888065
references: Genetica. 2003 Jan;117(1):37-46
references: 12656571
references: J Comp Physiol A. 1999 Oct;185(4):341-52
references: 10555268
references: J Exp Biol. 2002 Feb;205(Pt 3):327-43
references: 11854370
references: Evolution. 2005 Apr;59(4):849-57
references: 15926694