Current status and future perspective of general surgical trainees in the Netherlands.
BACKGROUND
The opinions of general surgical trainees about their current training program and their future career plans are important because such information can inform any redesign of surgical training programs as well as future surgical manpower planning.


METHODS
A structured questionnaire was sent to 392 general surgical trainees in the Netherlands in 2005.


RESULTS
A total of 239 (61%) questionnaires were returned by 66 (28%) women and 173 (72%) men, mean age 31.3 years. On average, trainees worked in the hospital 55 hours per week (range: 22-80 h). The mean number of operative cases performed per year was 195 (range 35-450), and this had been stable since the year 2000. The quality of the supervision by staff surgeons was rated satisfactory. The vast majority of the trainees are also satisfied with the current single year of differentiation/specialized training into one of the subspecialties, although most trainees (83%) would like to enroll in a fellowship before taking a job as a consultant. There was also a desire to take maternity/paternity leave during training. Both male and female trainees expressed the wish to work an average of 52 hours per week as a consultant, and they want these hours to occur in 4.1 days of work per week.


CONCLUSIONS
Dutch general surgery trainees are satisfied with their training. They expressed a strong wish for specialization during and after their training. All trainees favored reduced working hours and days of work per week as fully qualified surgeons in the future.
Wijnhoven
Bas P L
BP
Flinders University Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, 3 Flinders Drive, Bedford Park, 5042, South Australia, Australia. Bas.Wijnhoven@fmc.sa.gov.au
Watson
David I
DI
van den Ende
Esther D
ED
D000328:Adult; D002321:Career Choice; D004503:Education, Medical, Graduate; D005260:Female; D013502:General Surgery / Q000193:education*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009426:Netherlands; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D016526:Workload
Can J Surg. 1999 Dec;42(6):451-6
10593247
Ann Surg. 1984 Nov;200(5):638-43
6486911
Cancer. 2001 Apr 15;91(8):1574-8
11301408
Arch Surg. 2002 Aug;137(8):941-5; discussion 945-7
12146995
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Oct;199(4):615-9
15454148
S Afr J Surg. 2006 Aug;44(3):88-92, 94
16958234
Surgery. 2004 Oct;136(4):861-71
15467673
Arch Surg. 2005 Feb;140(2):137-45
15723994
Arch Surg. 2006 Oct;141(10):977-82
17043275
J Surg Res. 2001 Jun 15;98(2):71-5
11397120
Arch Surg. 2002 Mar;137(3):259-67
11888445
J Am Coll Surg. 2005 Apr;200(4):538-45
15804467
ANZ J Surg. 2003 Dec;73(12):1036-40
14632900
Arch Surg. 2001 Jun;136(6):649-55
11387001
Surgery. 2003 Oct;134(4):591-6; discussion 596-8
14605619
Curr Surg. 2005 Sep-Oct;62(5):543-6
16125618
Am J Surg. 2005 Sep;190(3):345-50
16105514
Surgery. 2005 Aug;138(2):246-53
16153433
JAMA. 2005 Sep 7;294(9):1088-100
16145030
Surgeon. 2004 Jun;2(3):161-4
15570819
Arch Surg. 2002 Mar;137(3):255-6
11888443
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2006 Apr 8;150(14):791-8
16649399
Curr Surg. 2003 Mar-Apr;60(2):210-3
14972298
Am Surg. 2005 Nov;71(11):971-4; discussion 974-6
16372617
J Am Coll Surg. 2005 May;200(5):670-6
15848356
BMJ. 1997 Nov 15;315 (7118):1306-7
9390067
J Am Coll Surg. 2004 Nov;199(5):792-9
15501122
Arch Surg. 1995 Jan;130(1):24-8
7802572
Arch Surg. 2000 Aug;135(8):972-7
10922261
Ann Surg. 2006 Jun;243(6):864-71; discussion 871-5
16772790