title: Laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: initial experience in Mexico.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Since the introduction of laparoscopic colectomy in 1991, experience in laparoscopic bowel surgery has gradually increased. Several reports from specialized centers have demonstrated that laparoscopic colorectal resections are feasible and safe, providing an acceptable alternative to laparotomy for a variety of diseases. Some studies have shown the feasibility, safety, and good functional outcome of the minimally invasive procedures for ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). No known studies have investigated laparoscopic proctocolectomy in México. This report aims to describe the first laparoscopic proctocolectomies with ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) performed at the Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán (INCMNSZ).
  
  
  METHODS
  All the patients in the authors' institution who underwent a one- or two-stage laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with IPAA between June 2005 and December 2006 were included in the study. All the operations were performed by the same surgeon, who had already completed the learning curve for colorectal laparoscopic procedures.
  
  
  RESULTS
  For the study, 10 patients underwent a laparoscopic proctocolectomy with IPAA by a single surgeon. Eight of the patients underwent a one-stage procedure, whereas two patients with severe colitis underwent a two-step procedure. All the cases were managed with a diverting loop ileostomy. Six patients underwent a standard double-stapled IPAA anastomosis, and two patients with FAP underwent a mucosectomy with a manual IPAA anastomosis. The mean operative time was 187 min, and the mean blood loss was 46 ml. There were two postoperative complications. One patient presented with an early small bowel obstruction due to an internal hernia, which required reoperation. The other complication was a wound infection. The mean return to oral intake was 1.5 days, and the mean length of hospital stay was 3.4 days.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Although this was not a comparative study and although sample size imposed limitations, with this preliminary data, we conclude that the laparoscopic approach to UC and FAP at our institution is safe, feasible, and effective. However, to achieve the benefits in postoperative outcome, this procedure should be performed only by experienced laparoscopic surgeons.
authors: Department of Surgery, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga No.15 Tlalpan, CP, 14000, México.
authors: F
authors: F
authors: López-Rosales
authors: Q
authors: Q
authors: González-Contreras
authors: L J
authors: LJ
authors: Muro
authors: M M
authors: MM
authors: Berber
authors: H T Cid
authors: HT
authors: de León
authors: O V
authors: OV
authors: Fernández
authors: R R
authors: RR
authors: Veana
mesh_terms: D011125:Adenomatous Polyposis Coli / Q000601:surgery*; D000328:Adult; D016063:Blood Loss, Surgical; D003093:Colitis, Ulcerative / Q000601:surgery*; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D006547:Hernia / Q000150:complications; D006801:Humans; D007415:Intestinal Obstruction / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery; D010535:Laparoscopy; D007902:Length of Stay; D008297:Male; D008800:Mexico; D008875:Middle Aged; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D016737:Proctocolectomy, Restorative / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000379:methods; D012086:Reoperation; D013530:Surgical Wound Infection; D013997:Time Factors; D016896:Treatment Outcome
references: Surg Clin North Am. 2005 Feb;85(1):35-47, viii
references: 15619527
references: Ann Surg. 2004 Dec;240(6):984-91; discussion 991-2
references: 15570204
references: World J Surg. 1998 Apr;22(4):370-4
references: 9523519
references: Am J Surg. 2006 May;191(5):673-6
references: 16647358
references: Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 May;43(5):604-8
references: 10826418
references: Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2006 Jun;98(6):420-8
references: 16948541
references: Dis Colon Rectum. 1997 Jun;40(6):675-8
references: 9194461
references: Br J Surg. 2005 Jan;92(1):88-93
references: 15593294
references: BMC Surg. 2006 Nov 24;6:13
references: 17125500
references: Dis Colon Rectum. 2001 Dec;44(12):1800-7
references: 11742165
references: Colorectal Dis. 2006 Oct;8(8):626-36
references: 16970571
references: Dis Colon Rectum. 2002 Feb;45(2):207-10; discussion 210-1
references: 11852334
references: Ann Surg. 1995 Aug;222(2):120-7
references: 7639579
references: Dis Colon Rectum. 2005 Oct;48(10):1845-50
references: 16175324