Contact networks and transmission of an intestinal pathogen in bumble bee (Bombus impatiens) colonies.
In socially living animals, individuals interact through complex networks of contact that may influence the spread of disease. Whereas traditional epidemiological models typically assume no social structure, network theory suggests that an individual's location in the network determines its risk of infection. Empirical, especially experimental, studies of disease spread on networks are lacking, however, largely due to a shortage of amenable study systems. We used automated video-tracking to quantify networks of physical contact among individuals within colonies of the social bumble bee Bombus impatiens. We explored the effects of network structure on pathogen transmission in naturally and artificially infected hives. We show for the first time that contact network structure determines the spread of a contagious pathogen (Crithidia bombi) in social insect colonies. Differences in rates of infection among colonies resulted largely from differences in network density among hives. Within colonies, a bee's rate of contact with infected nestmates emerged as the only significant predictor of infection risk. The activity of bees, in terms of their movement rates and division of labour (e.g., brood care, nest care, foraging), did not influence risk of infection. Our results suggest that contact networks may have an important influence on the transmission of pathogens in social insects and, possibly, other social animals.
Otterstatter
Michael C
MC
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, 25 Harbord Street, Toronto, ON, Canada M5S 3G5. michael.otterstatter@utoronto.ca
Thomson
James D
JD
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D000818:Animals; D001516:Bees / Q000469:parasitology*; D016358:Contact Tracing / Q000379:methods*; D003421:Crithidia; D018562:Disease Transmission, Infectious; D009043:Motor Activity; D012931:Social Environment; D014741:Video Recording
Microbes Infect. 2003 Feb;5(2):189-96
12650777
Trends Ecol Evol. 1988 Mar;3(3):65-8
21227094
Soc Sci Med. 1985;21(11):1203-16
3006260
Am J Public Health. 1997 Aug;87(8):1289-96
9279263
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 May 7;273(1590):1073-8
16600883
Am J Epidemiol. 2005 Jan 1;161(1):62-72
15615916
Nature. 2003 May 1;423(6935):32
12721617
Parasitology. 2005 Jun;130(Pt 6):637-42
15977900
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Jan 7;274(1606):61-5
17015337
J Infect. 1997 Jan;34(1):49-54
9120324
Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Jun;20(6):345-53
16701391
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2001 May;76(2):211-37
11396847
Nature. 2006 Jul 20;442(7100):259-64
16855581
Am J Epidemiol. 1989 Apr;129(4):762-8
2923123
Naturwissenschaften. 2001 Apr;88(4):147-58
11480702
Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Jul;21(7):394-9
16815438
J Theor Biol. 2002 Apr 21;215(4):427-39
12069487
East Afr Med J. 1999 May;76(5):255-9
10750504
Bull Math Biol. 1991;53(1-2):3-32
2059740
J R Soc Interface. 2005 Sep 22;2(4):295-307
16849187
Prev Vet Med. 2003 Jun 12;59(3):147-67
12809760
Can Med Assoc J. 1978 Aug 12;119(3):241-2, 247-8
679128
Parasitology. 2006 Dec;133(Pt 6):749-61
16948877
J Evol Biol. 2004 Jul;17(4):829-33
15271082