In vivo micro-CT scanning of a rabbit distal femur: repeatability and reproducibility.
Before in vivo micro-CT scanning can be used to investigate femoral trabecular microarchitecture over time in rabbits, its repeatability and reproducibility must be demonstrated. To accomplish this, both distal femurs of two 6-month-old New Zealand white rabbits were scanned five times each in 1 day under different conditions (repeatability). Scanning was done at 28 microm isotropic voxel size to produce five image stacks of each femur. Three operators then followed a standard image processing protocol (reproducibility) to isolate two separate cubes from each anterior femoral condyle [total n = (8 cube sites)(5 scans)(3 operators) = 120]. Bone volume fraction (BV/TV) of the eight different cube sites (sample) ranged from 0.408 to 0.501 (mean: 0.453); trabecular thickness (Tb.Th) ranged from 158.1 to 185.5 microm (mean: 168.6 microm); and trabecular separation (Tb.Sp) ranged from 179.4 to 233.1 microm (mean: 204.7 microm). Using ANOVA and the variance component method, the total process variation was +/- 14.1% of the mean BV/TV of 0.453. The sample variation was +/- 13.9% (p < 0.001), the repeatability was +/- 2.1% (p < 0.001), and the reproducibility was +/- 0.1% (p > 0.05). Results were similar for Tb.Th and Tb.Sp. Though the contribution due to repeatability was statistically significant for each of the three indices, the natural sample differences were far greater than differences caused by repeated scanning under different conditions or by different operators processing the images. These findings suggest that in vivo micro-CT scanning of rabbit distal femurs was repeatable and reproducible and can be used with confidence to measure differences in trabecular bone microarchitecture at a single location in a longitudinal study design.
Voor
Michael J
MJ
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orthopaedic Bioengineering Laboratory, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40292, USA. mike.voor@louisville.edu
Yang
Shuo
S
Burden
Robert L
RL
Waddell
Seid W
SW
D000818:Animals; D005260:Female; D005269:Femur / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods; D011817:Rabbits; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data
J Orthop Res. 1990 Nov;8(6):833-42
2213340
Bone. 2006 Oct;39(4):932-7
16750438
J Biomech. 1995 Jan;28(1):69-81
7852443
J Bone Miner Metab. 2006;24(6):467-75
17072739
J Biomech. 1999 Mar;32(3):323-6
10093033
J Orthop Res. 2006 Apr;24(4):628-35
16514642
J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2004 Aug;15(8):859-64
15477737
J Orthop Res. 2006 May;24(5):877-88
16609976
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2004 Jan;23(1):53-62
14719687
J Orthop Res. 2006 May;24(5):926-35
16583450
Bone. 2000 Nov;27(5):715-20
11062361
Osteoporos Int. 2001;12(11):936-41
11804020
Bone. 1998 Jul;23(1):59-66
9662131
Technol Health Care. 1998 Dec;6(5-6):329-37
10100936
Ann Biomed Eng. 2006 Oct;34(10):1587-99
16957987
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1997 Apr;16(2):187-98
9101328
J Bone Miner Metab. 2005;23 Suppl:90-6
15984422
J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2004 Nov 15;71(2):398-407
15389506
J Biomech. 2004 May;37(5):613-21
15046990
J Bone Miner Res. 1989 Feb;4(1):3-11
2718776
Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin. 1997;1(1):15-23
11264794
J Clin Densitom. 2004 Summer;7(2):153-60
15181259
Bone. 1999 Aug;25(2 Suppl):55S-58S
10458276
J Orthop Res. 1994 Sep;12(5):747-9
7931793
Tissue Eng. 2006 Jul;12(7):1753-61
16889506
Bone. 2005 Jun;36(6):1030-8
15878316
J Bone Miner Res. 2004 Oct;19(10):1640-50
15355559
J Biomech. 2001 Apr;34(4):513-7
11266675
J Bone Miner Res. 1999 Jul;14(7):1167-74
10404017
Bone. 2006 Jun;38(6):871-7
16431171
Bone. 2006 Oct;39(4):854-62
16757220
J Clin Invest. 1983 Oct;72(4):1396-409
6630513
J Biomech. 1999 Aug;32(8):821-8
10433424
Biomaterials. 2001 Jul;22(14):1953-9
11426873
Bone. 2004 Jan;34(1):163-9
14751574
J Orthop Res. 2006 Aug;24(8):1597-606
16779815
J Bone Miner Res. 1995 Feb;10(2):264-70
7754806