title: Repetition priming endurance in picture naming and translation: contributions of component processes.
abstract: The processes contributing to the durability of repetition priming in picture naming and its decline across a week were assessed in two experiments with Spanish-English bilinguals. In Experiment 1, both picture identification and word retrieval processes of picture naming exhibited facilitation after a week. Word retrieval priming declined substantially relative to a 10-min retention interval, but picture identification priming remained stable. In Experiment 2, word translation exhibited repetition priming after a week. Decreased word retrieval priming accounted for the attenuation of translation priming relative to a 10-min interval, whereas word comprehension priming remained stable. A linear process model was used to formalize and test key hypotheses and to clarify the influences of component processes and retention interval on repetition priming.
authors: Department of Psychology, University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas 79968, USA. wfrancis@utep.edu
authors: Wendy S
authors: WS
authors: Francis
authors: Silvia P
authors: SP
authors: Sáenz
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D003071:Cognition; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010507:Periodicity; D012153:Retention, Psychology; D012660:Semantics; D014705:Verbal Behavior; D014796:Visual Perception
references: Mem Cognit. 1985 May;13(3):273-9
references: 4046828
references: J Cogn Neurosci. 1992 Summer;4(3):244-56
references: 23964881
references: Cogn Psychol. 1991 Jul;23(3):393-419
references: 1884597
references: Psychol Rev. 1989 Jan;96(1):5-24
references: 2928419
references: Psychol Aging. 1990 Jun;5(2):264-76
references: 2378692
references: Psychol Rev. 2004 Oct;111(4):864-79
references: 15482065
references: Mem Cognit. 2002 Jun;30(4):614-28
references: 12184563
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2003 Nov;29(6):1283-97
references: 14622061
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1980 Mar;6(2):174-215
references: 7373248
references: Q J Exp Psychol A. 1992 May;44(4):723-61
references: 1615171
references: Memory. 1996 Mar;4(2):159-73
references: 8697035
references: Mem Cognit. 1987 Jul;15(4):269-80
references: 3670049
references: Psychol Bull. 1996 Jul;120(1):113-39
references: 8711012
references: Psychol Bull. 1999 Mar;125(2):193-222
references: 10087936
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1980 Dec;109(4):373-92
references: 6449530
references: Mem Cognit. 1987 Sep;15(5):379-88
references: 3670057
references: Mem Cognit. 2000 Oct;28(7):1140-51
references: 11126937
references: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Jun;24(3):732-44
references: 9627412
references: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1999 Dec;128(4):479-98
references: 10650584
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999 Jan;25(1):41-53
references: 9949707
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2002 Jul;28(4):726-34
references: 12109764
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 May;22(3):639-53
references: 8656150
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992 May;18(3):509-20
references: 1534352
references: Nature. 1975 Feb 6;253(5491):437-8
references: 1110787
references: Science. 1990 Jan 19;247(4940):301-6
references: 2296719
references: Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Dec;12(6):1082-8
references: 16615332
references: Q J Exp Psychol A. 1992 May;44(4):763-83
references: 1615172
references: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1988 Apr;14(2):213-22
references: 2967344