Biochemical reconstitution of abasic DNA lesion replication in Xenopus extracts.
Cellular DNA is under constant attack from numerous exogenous and endogenous agents. The resulting DNA lesions, if not repaired timely, could stall DNA replication, leading to genome instability. To better understand the mechanism of DNA lesion replication at the biochemical level, we have attempted to reconstitute this process in Xenopus egg extracts, the only eukaryotic in vitro system that relies solely on cellular proteins for DNA replication. By using a plasmid DNA that carries a site-specific apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) lesion as template, we have found that DNA replication is stalled one nucleotide before the lesion. The stalling is temporary and the lesion is eventually replicated by both an error-prone mechanism and an error-free mechanism. This is the first biochemical system that recapitulates efficiently and faithfully all major aspects of DNA lesion replication. It has provided the first direct evidence for the existence of an error-free lesion replication mechanism and also demonstrated that the error-prone mechanism is a major contributor to lesion replication.
Liao
Shuren
S
Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA.
Matsumoto
Yoshihiro
Y
Yan
Hong
H
D000818:Animals; D002457:Cell Extracts / Q000737:chemistry; D004247:DNA / Q000096:biosynthesis / Q000737:chemistry; D004249:DNA Damage; D004261:DNA Replication; D010063:Ovum / Q000378:metabolism; D013698:Templates, Genetic; D014981:Xenopus
D002457:Cell Extracts; D004247:DNA
Genes Dev. 2001 Apr 15;15(8):945-54
11316789
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Dec 19;92(26):11975-9
8618826
Science. 1983 May 13;220(4598):719-21
6601299
Nucleic Acids Res. 1992 Sep 11;20(17):4409-15
1408742
Mol Cell. 1998 Mar;1(4):519-29
9660936
J Mol Biol. 1994 Jul 29;240(5):416-20
8046747
Annu Rev Biochem. 2005;74:317-53
15952890
Annu Rev Biochem. 2002;71:333-74
12045100
J Mol Biol. 1999 Jul 9;290(2):447-57
10390343
DNA Repair (Amst). 2004 Jan 5;3(1):1-12
14697754
J Mol Biol. 1995 Aug 11;251(2):229-36
7643399
Annu Rev Biochem. 1998;67:721-51
9759502
Trends Genet. 2001 Apr;17(4):214-21
11275327
Mol Cell. 2002 Oct;10(4):917-24
12419234
J Biol Chem. 1996 Apr 19;271(16):9637-47
8621639
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Jan 29;359(1441):71-7
15065658
Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2004 Jun;14(3):292-300
15172673
Nature. 2000 Mar 2;404(6773):37-41
10716434
J Biol Chem. 1997 May 23;272(21):13945-54
9153257
Mol Cell. 2000 Apr;5(4):617-27
10882098
Cell. 1987 Jan 30;48(2):205-17
3026635
J Biol Chem. 1997 Jun 13;272(24):15351-7
9182564
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Aug 16;91(17):8165-9
7520176
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Aug 2;91(16):7752-6
8052656
Genes Cells. 2003 May;8(5):437-49
12694533
Bioessays. 2004 Feb;26(2):151-8
14745833
Science. 1999 Jul 9;285(5425):263-5
10398605
Nature. 1999 Jun 17;399(6737):700-4
10385124
Nature. 1996 Aug 22;382(6593):729-31
8751446
Trends Cell Biol. 2002 Nov;12(11):509-16
12446112
Nucleic Acids Res. 1994 May 25;22(10):1897-902
8208616