title: Stochastic matching and the voluntary nature of choice.
abstract: Attempts to characterize voluntary behavior have been ongoing for thousands of years. We provide experimental evidence that judgments of volition are based upon distributions of responses in relation to obtained rewards. Participants watched as responses, said to be made by "actors," appeared on a computer screen. The participant's task was to estimate how well each actor represented the voluntary choices emitted by a real person. In actuality, all actors' responses were generated by algorithms based on Baum's (1979) generalized matching function. We systematically varied the exponent values (sensitivity parameter) of these algorithms: some actors matched response proportions to received reinforcer proportions, others overmatched (predominantly chose the highest-valued alternative), and yet others undermatched (chose relatively equally among the alternatives). In each of five experiments, we found that the matchingactor's responses were judged most closely to approximate voluntary choice. We found also that judgments of high volition depended upon stochastic (or probabilistic) generation. Thus, stochastic responses that match reinforcer proportions best represent voluntary human choice.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Reed College, Portland, Oregon 97202, USA. allen.neuringer@reed.edu
authors.forename: Allen
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Neuringer
authors.forename: Greg
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Jensen
authors.forename: Paul
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Piff
mesh_terms: D002755:Choice Behavior; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D010988:Play and Playthings; D012054:Reinforcement, Psychology; D013269:Stochastic Processes; D014836:Volition