Toward a process-based framework for classifying personality tests: comment on Meyer and Kurtz (2006).
Meyer and Kurtz (2006) argued that the longstanding psychological test labels "objective" and "projective" have outlived their usefulness, and invited further work focusing on alternative terms for these measures. This Comment describes a framework for classifying personality tests based on the psychological processes that occur as people respond to test stimuli. Because an attribution process is involved in responding to both types of measures, those instruments formerly called "objective" tests are labeled self-attribution tests, and those formerly classified as "projective" tests are labeled stimulus-attribution tests. The possibility of extending the process-based framework beyond personality, to psychological tests in general, is also discussed. Clinical and empirical implications of a process-based framework are considered.
Bornstein
Robert F
RF
Derner Institute of Advanced Psychological Studies, Adelphi University, Garden City, NY 11530, USA. bornstein@adelphi.edu
D006801:Humans; D008960:Models, Psychological; D010551:Personality / Q000145:classification*; D010552:Personality Assessment / Q000592:standards*; D010556:Personality Tests / Q000592:standards*; D011386:Projective Techniques / Q000592:standards; D009626:Terminology as Topic