title: Belief in an unjust world: when beliefs in a just world fail.
abstract: Belief in a just world, where people get what they deserve, has been hypothesized to underlie a variety of psychological phenomena (Lerner, 1965). Close inspection of individual difference measures of this belief, however, has indicated repeatedly that just world beliefs are not a unidimensional construct. The purpose of this investigation was to elaborate upon the conceptualization of unjust world beliefs as a related but separate construct from just world beliefs. In two studies, the Unjust World Views scale (UJVS) was developed and its reliability and validity examined. The UJVS demonstrated acceptable reliability and validity and accounted for more variability in related outcomes than just world beliefs. Further, belief in an unjust world was related to defensive coping, anger, and perceived future risk. These findings contribute to theory development and suggest that a belief in an unjust world may serve a self-protective function. Clinical implications are discussed as unjust world views also were found to be potentially maladaptive.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California at Irvine 92697-7085, USA. hpenteco@uci.edu
authors.forename: Heather C
authors.initials: HC
authors.lastname: Lench
authors.forename: Esther S
authors.initials: ES
authors.lastname: Chang
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002140:California / Q000453:epidemiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007389:Internal-External Control; D008019:Life Style; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010552:Personality Assessment / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D020377:Self Efficacy; D012935:Social Justice; D013334:Students / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires