title: Continuous analysis of dissolved gaseous mercury and mercury volatilization in the upper St. Lawrence River: exploring temporal relationships and UV attenuation.
abstract: The formation and volatilization of dissolved gaseous mercury (DGM) is an important mechanism by which freshwaters may naturally reduce their mercury burden. Continuous analysis of surface water for diurnal trends in DGM concentration (ranging from 0 to 60.4 pg L(-1); n=613), mercury volatilization (ranging from 0.2 to 1.1 ng m(-2) h(-1); n=584), and a suite of physical and chemical measurements were performed during a 68 h period in the St. Lawrence River near Cornwall (Ontario, Canada) to examine the temporal relationships governing mercury volatilization. No lag-time was observed between net radiation and OGM concentrations (highest cross-correlation of 0.817), thus supporting previous research indicating faster photoreduction kinetics in rivers as compared to lakes. A significant lag-time (55-145 min; maximum correlation = 0.625) was observed between DGM formation and mercury volatilization, which is similar to surface water Eddy diffusion times of 42-132 min previously measured in the St. Lawrence River. A depth-integrated DGM model was developed using the diffuse integrated vertical attenuation coefficients for UVA and UVB (K(dI UVA) = 1.45 m(-1) K(dI UVB)= 3.20 m(-1)) Low attenuation of solar radiation was attributed to low concentrations of dissolved organic carbon (mean = 2.58 mg L(-1) and particulate organic carbon (mean = 0.58 mg L(-1) in the St. Lawrence River. The depth-integrated DGM model developed found that the top 0.3 m of the water column accounted for only 26% of the total depth-integrated DGM. A comparison with volatilization data indicated that a large portion (76% or 10.5 ng m(-2) of the maximum depth-integrated DGM (13.8 ng m(-2))is volatilized over a 24 h period. Therefore, at least 50% of all DGM volatilized was produced at depths below 0.3 m. These results highlight the importance of solar attenuation in regulating DGM formation with depth. The results also demonstrate both the fast formation of DGM in rivers and the importance of understanding DGM dynamics with depth as opposed to surface waters.
authors.affiliation: Department of Earth and Environmental Science, Acadia University, Wolfrille, Nova Scotia, Canada. nelson.odriscoll@acadiau.ca
authors.forename: N J
authors.initials: NJ
authors.lastname: O'Driscoll
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Poissant
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Canário
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Ridal
authors.forename: D R S
authors.initials: DR
authors.lastname: Lean
mesh_terms: D000388:Air; D002170:Canada; D005740:Gases / Q000032:analysis*; D019015:Geologic Sediments; D006813:Humidity; D008628:Mercury / Q000032:analysis*; D010084:Oxidation-Reduction / Q000528:radiation effects; D045483:Rivers / Q000737:chemistry*; D012995:Solubility / Q000528:radiation effects; D013696:Temperature; D013997:Time Factors; D014466:Ultraviolet Rays; D014835:Volatilization / Q000528:radiation effects; D014919:Wind