title: Construct and predictive validity of a self-reported measure of preclinical mobility limitation.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To validate self-reported preclinical mobility limitation concept and self-report assessment method against muscle power and walking speed, and to study the predictive validity of preclinical mobility limitation with respect to future risk of manifest mobility limitation.
  
  
  METHODS
  Observational prospective cohort study and cross-sectional analysis.
  
  
  METHODS
  Research laboratory and community.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 632 community-living (age range, 75-81 y) women and men took part in the baseline assessments and 302 persons in the semi-annual interviews on mobility limitation over 2 years.
  
  
  METHODS
  Not applicable.
  
  
  METHODS
  Walking speed, muscle power, and self-reported preclinical and manifest mobility limitation. Preclinical mobility limitation was defined as self-reported tiredness or modification of task performance without task difficulty. At baseline, 4 subgroups were created according to self-reported preclinical mobility limitation in any of 3 mobility tasks (walking 2 km, walking 0.5 km, climbing up stairs): no limitation, preclinical limitation, and minor and major manifest limitation.
  
  
  RESULTS
  At baseline, participants with preclinical mobility limitation showed intermediate levels of walking speed and muscle power, compared with those with no limitation or manifest mobility limitation. Participants reporting baseline preclinical mobility limitation had 3- to 6-fold higher age- and sex-adjusted risk of progressing to major manifest mobility limitation during the 2-year follow-up compared with participants with no limitation at baseline, whereas the risk among those with minor limitation at baseline was 14- to 18-fold higher compared with those with no limitation.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The self-report assessment tool proved to be a valid measure to capture the early signs of disability and may serve as an inexpensive tool for identifying those nondisabled persons at high risk for future disability.
authors.affiliation: Finnish Centre for Interdisciplinary Gerontology, Department of Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä, Finland. minna.manty@sport.jyu.fi
authors.forename: Minna
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Mänty
authors.forename: Ari
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Heinonen
authors.forename: Raija
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Leinonen
authors.forename: Timo
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Törmäkangas
authors.forename: Ritva
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Sakari-Rantala
authors.forename: Mirja
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hirvensalo
authors.forename: Mikaela B
authors.initials: MB
authors.lastname: von Bonsdorff
authors.forename: Taina
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Rantanen
mesh_terms: D000203:Activities of Daily Living; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D015577:Geriatric Assessment / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008124:Locomotion / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D009017:Morbidity / Q000639:trends; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012307:Risk Factors; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires