Solidarity and justice as guiding principles in genomic research.
In genomic research the ideal standard of free, informed, prior and explicit consent is sometimes difficult to apply. This has raised concern that important genomic research will be restricted. Different consent procedures have therefore been proposed. This paper explicitly examines the question how, in genomic research, the principles of solidarity and justice can be used to justify forms of diminished individual control over personal data and bio-samples. After a discussion of the notions of solidarity and justice and how they can be related to health care and genomic research, we examine how and in which situations these notions can form a strong moral basis for demanding certain financial sacrifices. Then we examine when these principles can justify consent procedures which diverge from the ideal standard. Because much genomic research is not expected to lead to immediate (clinical) benefits we also discuss the question of whether we can be obliged to make any sacrifices for future (not yet existing) patients. We conclude with the formulation of a number of conditions that have to be met before autonomy sacrifices can be reasonably demanded in genomic research.
Hoedemaekers
Rogeer
R
Dept of Ethics, Philosophy and History of Medicine, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, Netherlands. rhoed@hetnet.nl
Gordijn
Bert
B
Pijnenburg
Martien
M
D032984:Ethics, Research; D023281:Genomics / Q000941:ethics* / Q000592:standards / Q000639:trends; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D012935:Social Justice