Implications of sub-specialisation on the waiting times of general surgical clinics.
BACKGROUND
Controversy around sub-specialisation in a district general hospital (DGH) has been ongoing for years.


OBJECTIVE
To study the effect of colorectal sub-specialisation on general surgical cases.


METHODS
A retrospective audit between October 2002 and September 2003, including all referrals to the outpatient clinics of a single consultant surgeon in a DGH.


RESULTS
1,055 patients were seen in outpatient clinics, of which 53% (563) were seen in rapid access colorectal clinics. Overall, 87% (914) of patients were diagnosed to have colorectal pathology. The majority of the colorectal cases were referred using the designated referral forms. There were 427 urgent, 162 soon and 325 routine referrals with colorectal pathology, and 35 urgent, 22 soon and 84 routine referrals with non-colorectal pathology. Median waiting times for urgent, soon and routine referrals were 12, 61 and 91 days, respectively, for patients with colorectal pathology, in comparison with 44, 75 and 397 days for non-colorectal pathology.


CONCLUSIONS
This audit confirms that colorectal sub-specialisation has resulted in a significant delay in the management of patients with non-colorectal diseases. This has major implications within a DGH setting.
Shah
R R
RR
Prince Charles Hospital, Merthyr Tydfil, Wales, UK.
Barker
R
R
Haray
P N
PN
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D015179:Colorectal Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D013505:Digestive System Surgical Procedures / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005260:Female; D019983:Guideline Adherence; D006769:Hospitals, General / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012017:Referral and Consultation; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D006113:United Kingdom; D014850:Waiting Lists