"Remembering" emotional words is based on response bias, not recollection.
Recent studies have demonstrated that emotional stimuli result in a higher proportion of recognized items that are "remembered" (e.g., Kensinger & Corkin, 2003; Ochsner, 2000), leading to greater estimates of recollection by the dual-process model (Yonelinas, 1994). This result suggests that recognition judgments to emotional stimuli depend on a recollection process. We challenge this conclusion with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve data from two experiments. In both experiments, subjects studied neutral and emotional words. During the recognition test, subjects made old-new confidence ratings as well as remember-know judgments. Four models of remember-know judgments were fit to individual subjects' data: two versions of a one-dimensional signal-detection-based model (Donaldson, 1996; Wixted & Stretch, 2004), the dual-process model (Yonelinas, 1994), and the two-dimensional signal-detection-based model known as STREAK (Rotello, Macmillan, & Reeder, 2004). Consistent with the literature, we found that emotion increases subjective reports of "remembering:" However, our ROC analyses and modeling work reveal that the effect is due to response bias differences rather than sensitivity change or use of a high-threshold recollection process.
Dougal
Sonya
S
New York University, New York New York 10003, USA. sonya.dougal@nyu.edu
Rotello
Caren M
CM
D000328:Adult; D004644:Emotions; D005163:Factor Analysis, Statistical; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D008568:Memory; D008960:Models, Psychological