title: Formal quality criteria for websites do not guarantee complete health information of good quality: we need more attention to information on prognosis.
authors.affiliation: Department of General Practice Care, Public Health Research Institute, Universiteit Maastricht, Maastricht, the Netherlands. roelf.norg@hag.unimaas.nl
authors.forename: Roelf J C
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Norg
authors.forename: Nadia
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: El Bakkali
authors.forename: Piet J M
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Portegijs
authors.forename: J André
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Knottnerus
authors.forename: C P
authors.initials: CP
authors.lastname: van Schayck
mesh_terms: D000068:Accreditation / Q000592:standards; D054626:Consumer Health Information / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D016247:Information Storage and Retrieval / Q000592:standards; D020407:Internet / Q000592:standards*; D008297:Male; D008490:Medical Informatics / Q000592:standards*; D011379:Prognosis; D011470:Prostatic Hyperplasia / Q000175:diagnosis; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D019984:Quality Indicators, Health Care