Turning the history of medical ethics from its head onto its feet: a critical commentary on Baker and McCullough.
The paper provides a critical commentary on the article by Baker and McCullough on Medical Ethic's Appropriation of Moral Philosophy. The author argues that Baker and McCullough offer a more "pragmatic" approach to the history of medical ethics that has the potential to enrich the bioethics field with a greater historical grounding and sound methodology. Their approach can help us to come to a more nuanced understanding about the way in which medical ethics has connected, disconnected, and reconnected with philosophical ideas throughout the centuries. The author points out that Baker and McCullough's model can run the danger of overemphasizing the role of medical ethicists whilst marginalizing the influence of philosophers and of other historical actors and forces. He critically reviews the two case studies on which Baker and McCullough focus and concludes that scholars need to bear in mind the levels of uncertainty and ambivalence that accompany the process of transformation and dissemination of moral values in medicine and medical practice.
Schmidt
Ulf
U
School of History, University of Kent, Canterbury.
D001675:Bioethics / Q000266:history*; D004992:Ethics, Medical / Q000266:history*; D005065:Euthanasia / Q000941:ethics / Q000266:history*; D005858:Germany; D049671:History, 18th Century; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006801:Humans; D028681:Moral Obligations; D028683:National Socialism / Q000266:history