title: Effect of a nurse-implemented sedation protocol on the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine whether the use of a nurse-implemented sedation protocol could reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia in critically ill patients.
  
  
  METHODS
  Two-phase (before-after), prospective, controlled study.
  
  
  METHODS
  University-affiliated, 11-bed medical intensive care unit.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patients requiring mechanical ventilation for >or=48 hrs and sedative infusion with midazolam or propofol alone.
  
  
  METHODS
  During the control phase, sedatives were adjusted according to the physician's decision. During the protocol phase, sedatives were adjusted according to a protocol developed by a multidisciplinary team including nurses and physicians. The protocol was based on the Cambridge scale, and sedation level was adjusted every 3 hrs by the nurses. Standard practices, including weaning from the ventilator and diagnosis of VAP, were the same during both study phases.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 423 patients were enrolled (control group, n = 226; protocol group, n = 197). The incidence of VAP was significantly lower in the protocol group compared with the control group (6% and 15%, respectively, p = .005). By univariate analysis (log-rank test), only use of a nurse-implemented protocol was significantly associated with a decrease of incidence of VAP (p < .01). A nurse-implemented protocol was found to be independently associated with a lower incidence of VAP after adjustment on Simplified Acute Physiology Score II in the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model (hazard rate, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.62-0.95; p = .03). The median duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly shorter in the protocol group (4.2 days; interquartile range, 2.1-9.5) compared with the control group (8 days; interquartile range, 2.2-22.0; p = .001), representing a 52% relative reduction. Extubation failure was more frequently observed in the control group compared with the protocol group (13% and 6%, respectively, p = .01). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality (38% vs. 45% in the protocol vs. control group, respectively, p = .22).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In patients receiving mechanical ventilation and requiring sedative infusions with midazolam or propofol, the use of a nurse-implemented sedation protocol decreases the rate of VAP and the duration of mechanical ventilation.
authors.affiliation: Department of Critical Care Medicine, Bocage University Hospital, Dijon, France. jean-pierre.quenot@chu-dijon.fr
authors.forename: Jean-Pierre
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Quenot
authors.forename: Sylvain
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Ladoire
authors.forename: Fabrice
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Devoucoux
authors.forename: Jean-Marc
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Doise
authors.forename: Romain
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Cailliod
authors.forename: Nicole
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Cunin
authors.forename: Hervé
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Aubé
authors.forename: Bernard
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Blettery
authors.forename: Pierre Emmanuel
authors.initials: PE
authors.lastname: Charles
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D016292:Procedural Sedation / Q000379:methods* / Q000451:nursing*; D016638:Critical Illness; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008874:Midazolam / Q000008:administration & dosage; D008875:Middle Aged; D053717:Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated / Q000517:prevention & control*; D015742:Propofol / Q000008:administration & dosage; D016016:Proportional Hazards Models; D011446:Prospective Studies
chemical_list: D008874:Midazolam; D015742:Propofol