Mind the gap: Griffith University's approach to the governance of ethical conduct in human research.
It is perhaps not coincidental that, at the same time the apparent institutional risks associated with the conduct of human research are increasing, so are the complaints from researchers about research ethics committees. Rather than seeking to implement systems that more efficiently catch wrong-doing, in 2003 Griffith University began implementing an alternative approach. This new approach focused on resourcing the reflective practice of researchers through every stage of their work--well before, and long after, they seek ethical clearance for that work. Institutions have a key role to play in human research ethics, and this can be usefully situated within the broader framework of the institution's governance framework. This paper summarises the new approach that Griffith University adopted in 2003, the implementation of this 'model', the experience to date, and the road ahead.
Allen
Gary
G
Research Ethics, Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland.
D032781:Codes of Ethics; D028744:Ethics Committees, Research / Q000592:standards*; D032984:Ethics, Research; D006801:Humans; D011793:Queensland; D014495:Universities