title: [Current practices of oocyte donation in France and Europe].
abstract: This review aims to evaluate, in France, oocyte donation, an assisted reproductive technique (ART), for which 25 years of experience have shown its efficacy for the palliative treatment of infertility caused by ovarian exocrine failure. Its indications have since been expanded to cover certain genetic diseases and document failures of other ART attempts. Oocyte donation is performed within the framework of French legislation - bioethics laws 94-653 and 94-654 of 29 July 1994, and the revised bioethics law 2004-800 of 6 August 2004. Its main fundamental principles are: voluntary, free, anonymous donation, for which regulated confidentiality is assured and now - judicial decree 2004-606 of 24 June 2004 - and the synchronization of donor-recipient cycles with fresh embryo transfer in accordance with established safety procedures. According to the 2004 results of the French Group for the Study of Oocyte Donation (GEDO) for French centers actively involved in ART, the chance of pregnancy was increased to 43.4% for synchronized cycles with fresh embryo transfers versus 18.7% for deferred cycles with frozen-thawed embryos (P<0.01). In addition, follow-up studies reported the excellent family relationships and physical and psychological development of these children. The major difficulties encountered in the daily practice of oocyte donation concern the recruitment and management of donors, but also, and above all, the lack of optimal means to exercise this medical specialty, due to the lack of recognition of the organizational duties incurred, which are the cornerstone of the character-specific functioning of this type of ART. In comparison, we foresee that the discrepancies of this ART practice in Europe, with it differential facets, will lead to medical nomadism for those couples financially able to do so, when national conditions of access fail because of prohibitions but also as a consequence of insufficient means to perform the inherent tasks. Today, it seems essential to provide information on the particularity and practice of oocyte donation required for the comprehension of its obligations for the different players with the aim of obtaining the means necessary for the perpetuation of its practice.
authors.affiliation: Centre de fertilité, institut mutualiste Montsouris, 42, boulevard Jourdan, 75014 Paris, France. helene.letur@imm.fr
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Letur
mesh_terms: D026688:Bioethical Issues; D004624:Embryo Transfer; D005060:Europe; D005260:Female; D005307:Fertilization in Vitro / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D005602:France; D006801:Humans; D007247:Infertility, Female / Q000628:therapy*; D018587:Oocyte Donation / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000592:standards; D011247:Pregnancy; D018873:Pregnancy Rate; D027724:Reproductive Techniques, Assisted / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence