Intent to harm or injure? Gender and the expression of anger.
Gender differences in aggressive behaviour but not in anger suggest that women may express anger through behaviours that lack intent to harm or injure. Angry behaviours (injurious and noninjurious) were rated in terms of their likelihood of use when angry (N=888). Confirmatory factor analysis revealed a direct aggression factor and two further scales: explosive acts (e.g. throwing objects when alone) and defusing acts (e.g. talking to a third party). Men exceeded women on direct aggression and explosive acts, whereas women exceeded men on defusing acts. Expressive beliefs about aggression (as a loss of self-control) were higher among women and strongly associated with use of defusing acts and the avoidance of direct aggression. Instrumental beliefs about aggression (as a means of control over others) were higher among men and showed the opposite pattern of associations. We highlight the need for further work on actors' intention in relation to angry behaviours and the impact of context on these intentions.
Campbell
Anne
A
Psychology Department, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom. a.c.campbell@durham.ac.uk
Muncer
Steven
S
D000328:Adult; D000374:Aggression / Q000523:psychology*; D000786:Anger; D004739:England; D005260:Female; D006791:Hostility; D006801:Humans; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D007389:Internal-External Control; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008297:Male; D011594:Psychometrics; D020377:Self Efficacy; D017678:Sex Distribution; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires