title: A panel interview on the ethical practice of neuropsychology.
abstract: Neuropsychologists who have considerable experience reflecting, presenting, publishing, and advising on ethical matters are a rich resource for clinicians who have ethics questions. Consultation with such colleagues can be an important part of the ethical decision-making process. The purpose of the present article is to provide the opinions and perspectives of three neuropsychologists who, based on their experience and scholarly activities, served as panelists regarding ethical matters. Although the advice and opinions of colleagues are not a substitute for familiarity with relevant ethical requirements, guidelines, and professional literature, they offer valuable information that enhances the ethical decision-making process.
authors.forename: Shane S
authors.initials: SS
authors.lastname: Bush
authors.forename: Christopher L
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Grote
authors.forename: Doug E
authors.initials: DE
authors.lastname: Johnson-Greene
authors.forename: Michele
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Macartney-Filgate
mesh_terms: D003657:Decision Making / Q000941:ethics*; D004995:Ethics, Professional; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D009484:Neuropsychology / Q000941:ethics*; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'