Nutrition screen showed good agreement when self- and interviewer administered.
OBJECTIVE
SCREEN II is a valid and reliable (test-retest and interrater) nutrition risk-screening index for community-living older adults (50+ years). This questionnaire is preferably self-administered but can be administered by the interviewer for frailer adults who require assistance. Intermode agreement is necessary to determine if mode of administration is interchangeable.


METHODS
One hundred and thirty-four older adults completed the 17-item questionnaire twice within a 2-week interval in random order; 98 complete questionnaires were available for full analysis. Interviewer administration was completed over the telephone. Intraclass correlation and kappa coefficients were calculated to determine agreement.


RESULTS
There is very good agreement between overall self- and telephone-administered SCREEN II scores (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.74). When using a cut-point (score <50) to identify those at risk of malnutrition, agreement is good (kappa=0.53). Increasing age appears to consistently affect agreement. Individual questions which had poorer agreement included: food/fluid intake questions, supplement use, and intention to change weight.


CONCLUSIONS
The self- and interviewer-administered SCREEN II can be used interchangeably in practice or research, if total scores or the risk cutoff are used. Comparison of individual questions completed in different modes is not recommended.
Beath
Heather
H
University of Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Keller
Heather H
HH
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D004812:Epidemiologic Methods; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D005260:Female; D015577:Geriatric Assessment / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015596:Nutrition Assessment; D009752:Nutritional Status; D012650:Self Disclosure; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D013689:Telephone