Global bioethics: did the universal declaration on bioethics and human rights miss the boat?
This paper explores the evolution of the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (UDBHR), which was adopted by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (Unesco) in 2005. While the draft UDBHR generated controversy among bioethicists, the process through which it evolved excluded mainstream bioethicists. The absence of peer review affects the declaration's content and significance. This paper critically analyses its content, commenting on the failure to acknowledge socioeconomic and other factors that impede its implementation. The UDBHR outlines ideal standards but fails to provide guidance that can be readily applied in different settings. It strives for universality but does not contribute to understanding of universal or global bioethics.
Macpherson
Cheryl Cox
CC
Bioethics Department, St George's University School of Medicine, St George's, Grenada, West Indies. ccox@sgu.edu
D026688:Bioethical Issues / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000592:standards*; D006806:Human Rights / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D007391:International Cooperation / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D012935:Social Justice / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000592:standards*; D014480:United Nations / Q000941:ethics*