Juror perceptions of child eyewitness testimony in a sexual abuse trial.
A mock child sexual abuse trial was used to study juror perceptions of child eyewitnesses. The child's age (5, 11, or 16) and level of involvement (victim or bystander) were varied across conditions in order to test their impact on juror perceptions and verdict. Results indicated a significant effect of level of involvement on the verdict; defendants in trials involving a bystander witness received higher guilt ratings than defendants in trials with a victim-witness. In addition, jurors perceived the child's eyewitness testimony to be more believable when the child was younger. Implications for the impact of these findings on real-life child sexual abuse cases are discussed.
Holcomb
Matthew J
MJ
Department of Psychology, Mississippi State University, USA.
Jacquin
Kristine M
KM
D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D002648:Child; D002650:Child Abuse, Sexual / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D002651:Child Advocacy / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D019548:Crime Victims / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D003416:Criminal Law / Q000592:standards; D008192:Deception; D005104:Expert Testimony; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D033222:Judicial Role; D008297:Male; D028701:Patient Rights / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D010565:Persuasive Communication; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014342:Truth Disclosure; D014481:United States