title: A replication study of priorities and attitudes of two nursing programs' communities of interest: an appreciative inquiry.
abstract: American universities and nursing faculties, caught between the imperatives of community demand and university financial constraints, need to analyze their communities of interests' shared priorities for nursing education. This replication study's objective was to compare the priorities and attitudes of two nursing programs' communities of interest using appreciative inquiry (AI). The researchers used AI to conduct a qualitative, comparative analysis of data from two nursing programs. They used one-on-one and focus group interviews to examine stakeholders' views of the best of the nursing program's past, their vision and approaches to realizing the vision, and their roles in contributing to the vision they created. The researchers analyzed the qualitative data using a standardized codebook and content analysis. Respondents' priorities for both academic programs were similar, with the western respondents emphasizing nursing's contribution to quality care and the southern respondents emphasizing its leadership and commitment to diversity. Both identified the role of legislators and the community in partnering with nursing to secure funds for expansion. Both programs' respondents viewed nursing as a major part of the university and considered their role as supporters of the university's academic and financial goals. The two nursing programs appeared to harness external and internal support in their respective communities. While some priorities differed between the two nursing programs, respondents were aware of the ripple effect of decreased funding for nursing education on the delivery of nursing services to the community. Differences among the undergraduate and graduate students, which reflect a nursing program's student mix, underscore the priorities that nursing programs must emphasize.
authors: Fielding Graduate University, Santa Barbara, CA, USA. mfarrell@fielding.edu
authors: Marie
authors: M
authors: Farrell
authors: Nancy C
authors: NC
authors: Wallis
authors: Marci Tyler
authors: MT
authors: Evans
mesh_terms: D000288:Administrative Personnel / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000523:psychology*; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001290:Attitude; D002140:California; D004508:Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate / Q000458:organization & administration; D004511:Education, Nursing, Graduate / Q000458:organization & administration; D005181:Faculty, Nursing / Q000458:organization & administration; D005260:Female; D017144:Focus Groups; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008922:Mississippi; D015402:Nursing Education Research; D015404:Nursing Methodology Research; D009937:Organizational Objectives; D036301:Qualitative Research; D012570:School Admission Criteria; D012579:Schools, Nursing / Q000458:organization & administration*; D013338:Students, Nursing / Q000523:psychology*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014146:Training Support; D014495:Universities / Q000458:organization & administration*