title: Benchmarking consensus model quality assessment for protein fold recognition.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Selecting the highest quality 3D model of a protein structure from a number of alternatives remains an important challenge in the field of structural bioinformatics. Many Model Quality Assessment Programs (MQAPs) have been developed which adopt various strategies in order to tackle this problem, ranging from the so called "true" MQAPs capable of producing a single energy score based on a single model, to methods which rely on structural comparisons of multiple models or additional information from meta-servers. However, it is clear that no current method can separate the highest accuracy models from the lowest consistently. In this paper, a number of the top performing MQAP methods are benchmarked in the context of the potential value that they add to protein fold recognition. Two novel methods are also described: ModSSEA, which based on the alignment of predicted secondary structure elements and ModFOLD which combines several true MQAP methods using an artificial neural network.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The ModSSEA method is found to be an effective model quality assessment program for ranking multiple models from many servers, however further accuracy can be gained by using the consensus approach of ModFOLD. The ModFOLD method is shown to significantly outperform the true MQAPs tested and is competitive with methods which make use of clustering or additional information from multiple servers. Several of the true MQAPs are also shown to add value to most individual fold recognition servers by improving model selection, when applied as a post filter in order to re-rank models.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  MQAPs should be benchmarked appropriately for the practical context in which they are intended to be used. Clustering based methods are the top performing MQAPs where many models are available from many servers; however, they often do not add value to individual fold recognition servers when limited models are available. Conversely, the true MQAP methods tested can often be used as effective post filters for re-ranking few models from individual fold recognition servers and further improvements can be achieved using a consensus of these methods.
authors: The School of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading RG6 6AS, UK. l.j.mcguffin@reading.ac.uk
authors: Liam J
authors: LJ
authors: McGuffin
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D016000:Cluster Analysis; D016001:Confidence Intervals; D030562:Databases, Protein; D015201:Meta-Analysis as Topic; D008954:Models, Biological; D008958:Models, Molecular; D010363:Pattern Recognition, Automated / Q000379:methods*; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011487:Protein Conformation; D017510:Protein Folding; D011506:Proteins / Q000737:chemistry; D012107:Research Design
chemical_list: D011506:Proteins