Aesthetic properties of everyday objects.
This research addresses whether one underlying concept of appreciation exists across different classes of objects. Three studies were done. To identify aesthetic properties relevant for the aesthetic judgment of everyday objects and paintings, in Study 1 expert interviews were conducted with 12 interior designers, object-oriented designers and architects, and 12 students of art history. In Study 2, multidimensional unfolding (MDU) was used to examine whether common judgment criteria can be identified for the objects of the different classes. A sample of 217 German subjects participated. 2- or 3-dimensional MDU solutions resulted for each object class. The identified dimensions were labeled using the aesthetic properties derived from the expert interviews (Study 1). These dimensions represent relevant dimensions of aesthetic judgment on which object properties vary. Study 2 suggested that people use different dimensions of aesthetic judgment for different object classes. The identified dimensions were then used to construct three sets of systematically varied everyday objects and one set of systematically varied paintings. Using this stimulus material in Study 3, conjoint analysis indicated these dimensions are differentially important for the overall aesthetic judgment.
Stich
Christine
C
Freie Universität Berlin. christine.stich@mcgill.ca
Knäuper
Bärbel
B
Eisermann
Jens
J
Leder
Helmut
H
D000328:Adult; D001108:Architecture; D001336:Automobiles; D003297:Cooking and Eating Utensils; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D004954:Esthetics; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007374:Interior Design and Furnishings; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D008960:Models, Psychological; D010151:Paintings / Q000523:psychology; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D014796:Visual Perception