title: Proposing modesty for informed consent.
abstract: The extension of informed consent into social science research has met with considerable opposition. The history and concept of informed consent, however, is based on a substantive ethical notion of the research relationship as informed and voluntary that is appropriate for social science research relationships. Yet social science research might sometimes be different from health research in ways that justify a different approach to informed consent and research relationships. Social science research tends to have a lower magnitude of risk, usually does not need to disrupt the therapeutic assumption common in health research contexts or when researchers are health professionals, and recruitment is sometimes incremental and reflects a building of trust and development of the research participant's role. These differences may sometimes justify novel approaches to the research relationship and require case-by-case evaluation to determine their relevance to establishing the informed and voluntary nature of the relationship through the use of informed consent procedures. Ultimately, respect for research participants requires social research into practices that can support or replace informed consent. The institutional role of informed consent and the goal of informed and voluntary research participation serve modest but important roles in health and social research. Their proper role in health and social research requires flexibility and experimentation, but does not justify abdication of informed consent or the notion of informed and voluntary participation.
authors: University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC Canada. mburgess@ethics.ubc.ca
authors: Michael M
authors: MM
authors: Burgess
mesh_terms: D032984:Ethics, Research; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000941:ethics*; D018579:Patient Selection; D035842:Research Subjects; D035844:Researcher-Subject Relations / Q000941:ethics*; D012307:Risk Factors; D012942:Social Sciences / Q000941:ethics*