title: Effect of digital frequency compression (DFC) on speech recognition in candidates for combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS).
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare the effects of conventional amplification (CA) and digital frequency compression (DFC) amplification on the speech recognition abilities of candidates for a partial-insertion cochlear implant, that is, candidates for combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS).
  
  
  METHODS
  The participants were 6 patients whose audiometric thresholds at 500 Hz and below were <or=60 dB HL and whose thresholds at 2000 Hz and above were >or=80 dB HL. Six tests of speech understanding were administered with CA and DFC. The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB) was also administered following use of CA and DFC.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Group mean scores were not statistically different in the CA and DFC conditions. However, 2 patients received substantial benefit in DFC conditions. APHAB scores suggested increased ease of communication, but also increased aversive sound quality.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Results suggest that a relatively small proportion of individuals who meet EAS candidacy will receive substantial benefit from a DFC hearing aid and that a larger proportion will receive at least a small benefit when speech is presented against a background of noise. This benefit, however, comes at a cost-aversive sound quality.
authors: Arizona State University, Tempe, USA. gifford.rene@mayo.edu
authors: René H
authors: RH
authors: Gifford
authors: Michael F
authors: MF
authors: Dorman
authors: Anthony J
authors: AJ
authors: Spahr
authors: Sharon A
authors: SA
authors: McKarns
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001309:Auditory Threshold; D003054:Cochlear Implants; D004558:Electric Stimulation; D005260:Female; D006310:Hearing Aids; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D013061:Speech Acoustics; D013067:Speech Perception; D013997:Time Factors