title: Medical school admissions: revisiting the veracity and independence of completion of an autobiographical screening tool.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Some form of candidate-written autobiographical submission (ABS) is commonly used before interviews to screen candidates to medical school on the basis of their noncognitive characteristics. However, confidence in the validity of these measures has been questioned.
  
  
  METHODS
  In 2005, applicants to McMaster University completed an off-site ABS before being interviewed and an on-site ABS at interview. Five off-site ABS questions were completed, plus eight on-site questions. On-site ABS questions were answered in variable timing conditions. ABS ratings were compared across sites and time allowed for completion.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Off-site ABS ratings were higher than on-site ratings, and the two sets of ratings were uncorrelated with one another. On-site ABS ratings increased with increased time allowed for completion, but the reliability of the measure was unaffected by this variable.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Confidence that candidates independently answer preinterview ABS questions is weak. To improve ABS validity, modification of the current Web-based submission format warrants consideration.
authors: HSC 3G41, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5, Canada. hansonm@mcmaster.ca
authors: Mark D
authors: MD
authors: Hanson
authors: Kelly L
authors: KL
authors: Dore
authors: Harold I
authors: HI
authors: Reiter
authors: Kevin W
authors: KW
authors: Eva
mesh_terms: D001325:Autobiographies as Topic; D003219:Confidentiality; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic / Q000592:standards*; D009864:Ontario; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012570:School Admission Criteria / Q000639:trends*; D012577:Schools, Medical / Q000458:organization & administration*; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis