title: The relationship between guardian certification requirements and guardian sanctioning: a research issue in elder law and policy.
abstract: This study investigated the relationship between guardian certification requirements and guardian sanctioning in the state of Washington. A total of 377 files were examined. Findings show that 52.4% of guardians with an undergraduate degree or higher education are likely to be sanctioned compared with 42.2% with an Associate of Arts (AA) or Technical (Tech) degree, and 36.9% with a high school diploma (HS) or equivalency (GED). Guardians with an undergraduate or higher education are 1.88 times more likely to be sanctioned compared with GED or HS graduates (p < 0.05). However, 83.3% of GED or HS graduates are likely to have more severe sanctions compared with 76.4% undergraduate or higher education, and 47.7% with an AA or Tech degree, respectively. Guardians with an AA or Tech degree are 0.28 times less likely to have more severe sanctions than guardians with an undergraduate degree or higher education (p < 0.01). The results are discussed with respect to guardian registration, licensing, certification and quality; licensing and regulation of other professions; the limitations of the study; and the need for further research.
authors: Department of Health Policy and Administration, Washington State University, Spokane, WA 99210-1495, USA. schmidtw@wsu.edu
authors: Winsor C
authors: WC
authors: Schmidt
authors: Fevzi
authors: F
authors: Akinci
authors: Sarah A
authors: SA
authors: Wagner
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D002568:Certification / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000592:standards*; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D006801:Humans; D007872:Legal Guardians / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D011050:Policy Making; D014861:Washington