Abdominal paravaginal defect repair in the treatment of paravaginal defect and urodynamic stress incontinence.
We evaluated the morbidity, complications and outcomes in 42 patients who underwent abdominal paravaginal defect repair (PDR) for vaginal wall prolapse due to a paravaginal defect and the prolapse of other pelvic organs. Out of a total of the 42 patients, 32 underwent PDR and concomitant pelvic reconstructive procedures, and 10 patients underwent PDR plus anti-incontinence surgery and concomitant pelvic reconstructive procedures. The mean patient age was 44.5 years. The mean follow-up period was 40 months. One bladder injury and two hemorrhages occurred intraoperatively. The cure rate of anterior vaginal wall prolapse was 92.9%. Of the 20 patients with urodynamic stress incontinence (USI) who underwent PDR alone, the rate of recurrence of USI was 20%; however, there was no recurrence in the 10 patients who underwent PDR plus the anti-incontinence procedures. Paravaginal repair is a safe and effective procedure for the surgical correction of a paravaginal defect, but has limited applicability in the surgical correction of USI.
Demirci
F
F
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duzce University School of Medicine, Duzce, Turkey. fuatdemirci@superonline.com
Ozdemir
I
I
Somunkiran
A
A
Gul
O Kemik
OK
Gul
B
B
Doyran
G D
GD
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D013509:Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D019651:Plastic Surgery Procedures / Q000379:methods; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014550:Urinary Incontinence, Stress / Q000601:surgery*; D014596:Uterine Prolapse / Q000601:surgery*; D014621:Vagina / Q000601:surgery*