title: IBM, Elsevier Science, and academic freedom.
abstract: Elsevier Science refused to publish a study of IBM workers that IBM sought to keep from public view. Occupational and environmental health (OEH) suffers from the absence of a level playing field on which science can thrive. Industry pays for a substantial portion of OEH research. Studies done by private consulting firms or academic institutions may be published if the results suit the sponsoring companies, or they may be censored. OEH journals often reflect the dominance of industry influence on research in the papers they publish, sometimes withdrawing or modifying papers in line with industry and advertising agendas. Although such practices are widely recognized, no fundamental change is supported by government and industry or by professional organizations.
authors.forename: John C
authors.initials: JC
authors.lastname: Bailar
authors.forename: Andre
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Cicolella
authors.forename: Robert
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Harrison
authors.forename: Joseph
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: LaDou
authors.forename: Barry S
authors.initials: BS
authors.lastname: Levy
authors.forename: Timothy
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Rohm
authors.forename: Daniel T
authors.initials: DT
authors.lastname: Teitelbaum
authors.forename: Yung-Der
authors.initials: YD
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Andrew
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Watterson
authors.forename: Fumikazu
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Yoshida
mesh_terms: D016265:Conflict of Interest; D004782:Environmental Health; D005610:Freedom; D007221:Industry; D016272:Occupational Health; D011643:Publishing; D012106:Research; D012109:Research Support as Topic; D014495:Universities