[Integrated case fees in cardiosurgery--a pilot project for fast-track rehabilitation].
BACKGROUND
Lengthy recovery and treatment times following cardiosurgical interventions were the motivation for introducing a pilot procedure to integrate acute and rehabilitative treatment structures. The advantage of such a pilot procedure is the medico-economic link between direct transition from acute care to rehabilitation treatment and cutting average case costs. With this in mind, shared case fees for patients following cardiosurgery are being agreed in a pilot project between health insurance companies, acute-care hospitals and rehabilitation clinics. The aim of this study was thus to investigate whether rehabilitation directly after cardiosurgery without prior transferral to an acute-care hospital is comparable with the conventional procedure involving acute care.


METHODS
A total of 221 patients were included in the investigation. The pilot project group comprised 159 patients (mean age 70 +/- 6 yrs, 117 men and 42 women) who were transferred directly to rehabilitation following cardiosurgery. The control group, comprising 62 patients (mean age = 71 +/- 6 yrs, 42 men and 20 women), was transferred to an acute-care hospital following cardiosurgery before commencing rehabilitation. Sociodemographic and clinical data were comparable between the two groups.


RESULTS
At the end of rehabilitation, the mean maximum ergometric performance in the pilot group was 96 +/- 33 W, significantly higher than the control group's performance of 81 +/- 31 W. One difference between the two groups related to complications. During rehabilitation, complications occurred more frequently within the pilot group. In the pilot group, compared to the control group, postcardiotomy syndrome occurred in 45.3 versus 25.8% and impaired wound healing in 10.1 versus 4.8% of cases. Despite these results, the pilot group demonstrated a significantly shorter overall hospital stay of 39.5 +/- 7.5 days compared to the control group stay of 45.7 +/- 9.7 days.


CONCLUSIONS
Compared to the control group, the pilot group was at no disadvantage with regard to clinical or performance data by the end of rehabilitation. Cardiac complications occur more often during rehabilitation taking place directly after cardiosurgery than with the conventional procedure. These can be viewed, however, as complications occurring directly in temporal conjunction with the operation and as to be expected. Complications attributed directly to fast-track rehabilitation can be excluded. In the pilot group the overall hospital stay was thus shortened. In an environment of legislative restructuring within the healthcare sector, this shows that adequate treatment of cardiosurgical patients is still guaranteed with fast-track rehabilitation.
Miche
E
E
Rehabilitationszentrum, Gernsbach.
Knosp
J
J
Pappenroth
N
N
Ennker
J
J
Beinhofer
W
W
Dirschedl
P
P
Radzewitz
A
A
D000368:Aged; D002204:Capitation Fee / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D013504:Cardiovascular Surgical Procedures / Q000191:economics* / Q000534:rehabilitation* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D019033:Delivery of Health Care, Integrated / Q000191:economics* / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D018588:Fee-for-Service Plans / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005858:Germany; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010865:Pilot Projects; D020127:Recovery of Function; D012046:Rehabilitation / Q000191:economics* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D016896:Treatment Outcome