Amalgam and composite posterior restorations: curriculum versus practice in operative dentistry at a US dental school.
This study recorded the number of preclinical lecture and simulation laboratory sessions spent teaching the preparation and placement of amalgam and resin composite posterior restorations. These data were compared to the use of both materials in the operative clinic as placed by third- and fourth-year students. The number of posterior restorations inserted by the students, expressed as a function of the number of restoration surfaces, was also evaluated. The results show that the teaching of posterior restorations pre-clinically has consistently favored amalgam 2.5 to 1 during the last three years. However, clinically, resin composite is being used for posterior restorations 2.3 times more often than amalgam. The only instance that favored amalgam over composite during the last year was in the placement of four surface posterior restorations. This shift in emphasis from amalgam to composite needs to be addressed within dental educational institutions so that newly graduated dentists are prepared to place composite restorations properly.
Ottenga
Marc E
ME
Department of Operative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA. mottenga@dental.ufl.edu
Mjör
Ivar
I
D003188:Composite Resins; D003479:Curriculum; D003723:Dental Amalgam; D003737:Dental Cavity Preparation / Q000145:classification / Q000379:methods; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000145:classification / Q000379:methods; D003814:Dentistry, Operative / Q000193:education*; D004497:Education, Dental; D005431:Florida; D006801:Humans; D007754:Laboratories, Dental; D012575:Schools, Dental; D013663:Teaching / Q000379:methods
D003188:Composite Resins; D003723:Dental Amalgam