title: Input and output modality effects in immediate serial recall.
abstract: In immediate recall tasks, visual recency is substantially enhanced when output interference is low (Cowan, Saults, Elliott, & Moreno, 2002; Craik, 1969) whereas auditory recency remains high even under conditions of high output interference. This auditory advantage has been interpreted in terms of auditory resistance to output interference (e.g., Neath & Surprenant, 2003). In this study the auditory-visual difference at low output interference re-emerged when ceiling effects were accounted for, but only with spoken output. With written responding the auditory advantage remained significantly larger with high than with low output interference. These new data suggest that both superior auditory encoding and modality-specific output interference contribute to the classic auditory-visual modality effect.
authors.affiliation: University of Winchester, UK. alistair.harvey@winchester.ac.uk
authors.forename: Alistair J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Harvey
authors.forename: C Philip
authors.initials: CP
authors.lastname: Beaman
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001307:Auditory Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D011939:Mental Recall / Q000502:physiology*; D008875:Middle Aged; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D011930:Reaction Time; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*