Reoperation for dysphagia after cardiomyotomy for achalasia.
BACKGROUND
Although laparoscopic cardiomyotomy is considered to be the treatment of choice for achalasia, there is no consensus about how persistent or recurrent dysphagia after myotomy should be treated. In the current study we evaluated our experience with reoperation following previous cardiomyotomy.


METHODS
Between 1992 and 2006, 19 patients underwent re-myotomy: 7 for persistent dysphagia, 12 for recurrent dysphagia. Different operative approaches were used, depending on surgeon's preference and the technique used for the first operation.


RESULTS
The mean interval between the cardiomyotomies was 81 months. In 12 patients, the alternative body cavity to that used for the first operation was used for access in the revision operation. This was associated with a shorter operation time. Mean follow-up after the revision operation was 3.6 years. Mean satisfaction score was 7 (out of 10), and 89% of patients had an improvement in symptoms.


CONCLUSIONS
Reoperation for persistent or recurrent achalasia achieves a satisfactory outcome in most patients. Using the alternative body cavity to that used in the original procedure facilitates minimal access techniques, and gives easier access to the operative field.
Grotenhuis
Brechtje A
BA
Flinders University Department of Surgery, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042, Australia.
Wijnhoven
Bas P L
BP
Myers
Jennifer C
JC
Jamieson
Glyn G
GG
Devitt
Peter G
PG
Watson
David I
DI
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003680:Deglutition Disorders / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery*; D013505:Digestive System Surgical Procedures / Q000009:adverse effects*; D004931:Esophageal Achalasia / Q000601:surgery*; D004947:Esophagus / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012086:Reoperation