Biotechnology and the new right: neoconservatism's red menace.
Although the neoconservative movement has come to dominate American conservatism, this movement has its origins in the old Marxist Left. Communists in their younger days, as the founders of neoconservatism, inverted Marxist doctrine by arguing that moral values and not economic forces were the primary movers of history. Yet the neoconservative critique of biotechnology still borrows heavily from Karl Marx and owes more to the German philosopher Martin Heidegger than to the Scottish philosopher and political economist Adam Smith. Loath to identify these sources--or perhaps unaware of them--neoconservatives do not acknowledge these intellectual underpinnings or their implications. Thus, in the final analysis, their critique is incoherent and even internally inconsistent. By not acknowledging and embracing their intellectual roots, neoconservatives are left with a deeply ambivalent and often confused view of biotechnology and the society that gives rise to it.
Moreno
Jonathan D
JD
Center for American Progress, Washington, DC 20005, USA. jmoreno@americanprogress.org
Berger
Sam
S
D026688:Bioethical Issues; D020811:Biomedical Technology / Q000191:economics / Q000941:ethics; D030861:Capitalism; D032821:Commodification; D003148:Communism; D026822:Ethicists; D005086:Existentialism; D018594:Human Body; D006801:Humans; D009014:Morals; D010067:Ownership / Q000941:ethics; D011057:Politics; D011639:Public Opinion; D012918:Social Alienation; D012945:Social Values; D012950:Socialism; D014481:United States