Ear packing after ear surgery: is it really necessary?
OBJECTIVE
We question the need for packing of the ear canal after ear surgery. For several years, it had not been the first author's standard practice to use post-operative ear packing. During this period, few problems or complications had been encountered.


METHODS
Tertiary referral, academic, paediatric hospital.


METHODS
A retrospective review of all children who had undergone major ear surgery in our unit over the last year was carried out. These cases represented a full range of otological procedures. Post-operative complications and infections in the first six post-operative weeks were recorded.


RESULTS
A total of 135 ears were operated upon in 107 patients ranging in age from 11 months to 19 years (mean 9.5 years). During this time period, eight children (7.5 per cent) developed a post-operative ear infection. No cases of tympanic or meatal granulations, problems with the tympanomeatal flap, or meatal stenosis were encountered. All infections were successfully managed with topical antibiotics.


CONCLUSIONS
We conclude that packing after ear surgery may be safely abandoned. This would not only save valuable operating time, but would also obviate the need for pack removal, always a source of discomfort and anxiety. This is especially important in children, who may subsequently require a further general anaesthesia in order to remove the pack.
Borgstein
J
J
Department of Paediatric Otolaryngology, Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. j.borgstein@erasmusmc.nl
de Zwart
G
G
Bruce
I A
IA
D000293:Adolescent; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D004423:Ear / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D008297:Male; D009779:Occlusive Dressings / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011182:Postoperative Care / Q000379:methods*; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000517:prevention & control*; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D019564:Unnecessary Procedures