title: Redo pedal bypass surgery after pedal graft failure: gain or gadget?
abstract: Pedal bypass failure is not always associated with limb loss. Management of critical limb ischemia after failure is controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the results of redo bypass procedures to foot arteries in the absence of alternative tibial outflow arteries. Data of patients undergoing redo pedal bypass within a 14-year period were reviewed. The outcome after redo pedal bypass in patients whose original pedal bypass failed within 30 days versus those in patients whose original pedal bypass failed more than 30 days after the original pedal bypass were reviewed. Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards were applied. Out of 335 pedal bypass grafts, 22 (6.6%) pedal redo bypass procedures were identified in 20 patients performed after previous pedal graft failure: 64% were male, mean age 67.7 +/- 9.5 years, diabetes 90.9%, hypertension 90.9%, coronary disease 68.2%, renal disease 18.2%. Seven patients were operated for early failure and 15 for late failure (median 193 days). The graft conduit at the first operation was ipsilateral greater saphenous vein (GSV) in 18 (81.8%), alternative vein in three (13.6%), and one expanded polytetrafluoroethylene. Redo graft conduits were as follows: ipsilateral GSV in nine (40.9%), arm vein in six (27.3%), contralateral GSV in two (9.1%), "other veins" in two (9.1%), and homologous artery in three (13.6%). The same target artery was used in 81.8%, at the initial site in 54.5% and more distally in 27.3%. Redo revascularization for early failure was successful only once. Median follow-up after late redo was 23.7 months. Seven redo grafts performed after late pedal graft failure failed after a median of 115 days. The availability of adequate autologous conduit is the limiting factor for redo procedures. Lack of alternative outflow sites adds to the difficulty of target artery dissection. Redo pedal bypass surgery after early pedal bypass failure is associated with very poor patency and limb salvage. Acceptable patency and extension of limb salvage can be achieved with redo procedures for late pedal bypass failure.
authors.affiliation: Division of Vascular Surgery, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna Medical School, Vienna, Austria. christoph.domenig@meduniwien.ac.at
authors.forename: Christoph M
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Domenig
authors.forename: Manuela
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Aspalter
authors.forename: Max
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Umathum
authors.forename: Thomas J
authors.initials: TJ
authors.lastname: Holzenbein
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000714:Anastomosis, Surgical; D000925:Anticoagulants / Q000627:therapeutic use; D001158:Arteries / Q000637:transplantation*; D001241:Aspirin / Q000627:therapeutic use; D001807:Blood Vessel Prosthesis; D019917:Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / Q000295:instrumentation; D004359:Drug Therapy, Combination; D005260:Female; D005343:Fibrinolytic Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use; D005528:Foot / Q000098:blood supply*; D006801:Humans; D007511:Ischemia / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000188:drug therapy / Q000401:mortality / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D053208:Kaplan-Meier Estimate; D023821:Limb Salvage; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010644:Phenprocoumon / Q000627:therapeutic use; D011138:Polytetrafluoroethylene; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011859:Radiography; D012008:Recurrence; D012042:Registries; D012086:Reoperation; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012501:Saphenous Vein / Q000637:transplantation*; D013997:Time Factors; D017211:Treatment Failure; D014654:Vascular Patency
chemical_list: D000925:Anticoagulants; D005343:Fibrinolytic Agents; D011138:Polytetrafluoroethylene; D010644:Phenprocoumon; D001241:Aspirin