Deriving uncertainty factors for threshold chemical contaminants in drinking water.
Uncertainty factors are used in the development of drinking-water guidelines to account for uncertainties in the database, including extrapolations of toxicity from animal studies and variability within humans, which result in some uncertainty about risk. The application of uncertainty factors is entrenched in toxicological risk assessment worldwide, but is not applied consistently. This report, prepared in collaboration with Health Canada, provides an assessment of the derivation of the uncertainty factor assumptions used in developing drinking-water quality guidelines for chemical contaminants. Assumptions used by Health Canada in the development of guidelines were compared to several other major regulatory jurisdictions. This assessment has revealed that uncertainty factor assumptions have been substantially influenced by historical practice. While the application of specific uncertainty factors appears to be well entrenched in regulatory practice, a well-documented and disciplined basis for the selection of these factors was not apparent in any of the literature supporting the default assumptions of Canada, the United States, Australia, or the World Health Organization. While there is a basic scheme used in most cases in developing drinking-water quality guidelines for nonthreshold contaminants by the jurisdictions included in this report, additional factors are sometimes included to account for other areas of uncertainty. These factors may include extrapolating subchronic data to anticipated chronic exposure, or use of a LOAEL instead of a NOAEL. The default value attributed to each uncertainty factor is generally a factor of 3 or 10; however, again, no comprehensive guidance to develop and apply these additional uncertainty factors was evident from the literature reviewed. A decision tree has been developed to provide guidance for selection of appropriate uncertainty factors, to account for the range of uncertainty encountered in the risk assessment process. Recent development of a series of "decision trees" by WHO to derive chemical specific adjustment factors for inter- and intraspecies variability may present an opportunity for a more systematic approach for the identification of evidence-based uncertainty factors.
Ritter
Leonard
L
Department of Environmental Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. lritter@uoguelph.ca
Totman
Céline
C
Krishnan
Kannan
K
Carrier
Richard
R
Vézina
Anne
A
Morisset
Véronique
V
D000818:Animals; D001315:Australia; D002170:Canada; D006077:Government Agencies; D033161:Government Regulation; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D006801:Humans; D019055:No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level; D013045:Species Specificity; D018675:Toxicity Tests / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D035501:Uncertainty; D014481:United States; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical / Q000032:analysis* / Q000633:toxicity; D014881:Water Supply / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000592:standards*; D014944:World Health Organization
D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical