Can false memories be corrected by feedback in the DRM paradigm?
Normal processes of comprehension frequently yield false memories as an unwanted by-product. The simple paradigm now known as the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm takes advantage of this fact and has been used to reliably produce false memory for laboratory study. Among the findings from past research is the difficulty of preventing false memories in this paradigm. The purpose of the present experiments was to examine the effectiveness of feedback in correcting false memories. Two experiments were conducted, in which participants recalled DRM lists and either received feedback on their performance or did not. A subsequent recall test was administered to assess the effect of feedback. The results showed promising effects of feedback: Feedback enhanced both error correction and the propagation of correct recall. The data replicated other data of studies that have shown substantial error perseveration following feedback. These data also provide new information on the occurrence of errors following feedback. The results are discussed in terms of the activation-monitoring theory of false memory.
McConnell
Melissa D
MD
University of North Carolina, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA.
Hunt
R Reed
RR
D003071:Cognition; D005246:Feedback; D006801:Humans; D011939:Mental Recall; D011930:Reaction Time; D012094:Repression, Psychology; D014825:Vocabulary