title: Gastric versus postpyloric feeding.
abstract: Feeding into the small bowel is often recommended to improve nutrient delivery for critically ill patients, and thus improve outcome and reduce complications associated with enteral feeding. Risks and benefits of gastric feeding, use of motility agents, postpyloric feeding, and obtaining small bowel access are discussed here. Randomized clinical trials directly comparing postpyloric with gastric feeds are also evaluated. These small, underpowered studies demonstrate small but clinically important differences in important outcomes (pneumonia), but are weakened by significant heterogeneity. Current evidence does not support routine use of postpyloric feeding in the critically ill. A standardized approach to optimizing benefits and minimizing risks with enteral nutrition delivery will help clinicians identify patients who would benefit from small bowel feeding.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Kingston General Hospital, Queen's University, 76 Stuart Street, Kingston, Ontario, Canada K7L 2V7. droverj@kgh.kari.net
authors.forename: John W
authors.initials: JW
authors.lastname: Drover
mesh_terms: D016638:Critical Illness; D004750:Enteral Nutrition / Q000009:adverse effects*; D005746:Gastric Emptying; D006801:Humans; D007421:Intestine, Small; D007441:Intubation, Gastrointestinal / Q000009:adverse effects*; D018529:Nutritional Support; D010288:Parenteral Nutrition; D011015:Pneumonia, Aspiration / Q000209:etiology; D012307:Risk Factors