title: Superiority of anti-reflux stent compared with conventional stents in the palliative management of patients with cancer of the lower esophagus and esophago-gastric junction: results of a randomized clinical trial.
abstract: Palliation of inoperable esophageal cancer with covered stents aims to relieve progressive dysphagia and improve health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Introducing a stent across the esophagogastric junction in lower third tumors may predispose to unchecked gastro-esophageal reflux (GER). Esophageal stents incorporating an anti-reflux valve have been introduced to address this problem. We prospectively compared an anti-reflux stent with a standard stent in the palliation of inoperable lower third esophageal tumors. Forty-nine consecutive patients with malignant dysphagia were randomized to receive a standard (n = 25, group 1) or an anti-reflux stent (n = 24, group 2). HRQoL was assessed before stenting, at 1 week and at 2 months, utilizing European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaires QLQ-C30, QLQ-OES24 and reflux questionnaires. Esophageal pH testing was performed within 1 week of the stent insertion. Detailed statistical analysis was employed to assess general QoL, symptoms and pH scores in both groups. Both groups reported significantly improved QoL, health and dysphagia scores at 1 week and 2 months after stenting. Group 2 patients reported significantly (P < 0.05) better DeMeester symptom, general reflux scores, and normal pH profile at 1 week. At 2 months DeMeester symptom scores were significantly (P < 0.05) better in group 2 compared with group 1. Standard and anti-reflux stents afford comparable relief from dysphagia and improved quality of life in patients with inoperable lower third esophageal cancer. Anti-reflux stents, however, controlled symptomatic and physiologically relevant reflux and should therefore be considered as optimal palliation in this cohort.
authors.affiliation: Departments of Surgery and Gastrointestinal Physiology, Trinity Center for Health Sciences, St. James's Hospital, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 8, Ireland.
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Power
authors.forename: P J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Byrne
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Lim
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Ravi
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Moore
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Fitzgerald
authors.forename: P W N
authors.initials: PW
authors.lastname: Keeling
authors.forename: J V
authors.initials: JV
authors.lastname: Reynolds
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D004867:Equipment Design; D004938:Esophageal Neoplasms / Q000628:therapy*; D004943:Esophagogastric Junction / Q000473:pathology*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D005764:Gastroesophageal Reflux / Q000517:prevention & control*; D006801:Humans; D006863:Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010166:Palliative Care; D015607:Stents; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires