Climbing up the pay-for-performance learning curve: where are the early adopters now?
The diffusion of performance-based payment incentives is arguably the most striking change in the U.S. health care system since the managed care era. Because there is little knowledge about best practices, sponsors of payment-incentive programs must learn by doing. We examine the experiences of twenty-seven early adopters and profile the evolution of their pay-for-performance (P4P) strategies as well as perceptions of key lessons learned. Our findings suggest that leading-edge sponsors of P4P have expanded the reach of their efforts, particularly with regard to specialists, and increasingly are focused on outcome and cost-efficiency measures, rather than clinical process measures alone.
Rosenthal
Meredith B
MB
Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, in Boston, Massachusetts, USA. mrosenth@hsph.harvard.edu
Landon
Bruce E
BE
Howitt
Katherine
K
Song
HyunSook Ryu
HR
Epstein
Arnold M
AM
D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D004470:Economics, Medical; D004501:Education, Medical; D006801:Humans; D008511:Medicine / Q000592:standards; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000191:economics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D019984:Quality Indicators, Health Care; D012052:Reimbursement, Incentive; D013038:Specialization; D014481:United States