Influence of impulsivity-reflexivity when testing dynamic spatial ability: sex and g differences.
This work analyzes the possibility that the differences in the performance of men and women in dynamic spatial tasks such as the Spatial Orientation Dynamic Test-Revised (SODT-R; Santacreu & Rubio, 1998), obtained in previous works, are due to cognitive style (Reflexivity-Impulsivity) or to the speed-accuracy tradeoff (SATO) that the participants implement. If these differences are due to cognitive style, they would be independent of intelligence, whereas if they are due to SATO, they may be associated with intelligence. In this work, 1652 participants, 984 men and 668 women, ages between 18 and 55 years, were assessed. In addition to the SODT-R, the "Test de Razonamiento Analitico, Secuencial e Inductivo" (TRASI [Analytical, Sequential, and Inductive Reasoning Test]; Rubio & Santacreu, 2003) was administered as a measure of general intelligence. Impulsivity scores (Zi) of Salkind and Wright (1977) were used to analyze reflexivity-impulsivity and SATO. The results obtained indicate that (a) four performance groups can be identified: Fast-accurate, Slow-inaccurate, Impulsive, and Reflexive. The first two groups solve the task as a function of a competence variable and the last two as a function of a personality variable; (b) performance differences should be attributed to SATO; (c) SATO differs depending on sex and intelligence level.
Quiroga
M Angeles
MA
Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain.
Hernández
José Manuel
JM
Rubio
Victor
V
Shih
Pei Chun
PC
Santacreu
José
J
D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D001290:Attitude; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007175:Impulsive Behavior / Q000523:psychology*; D007360:Intelligence; D008297:Male; D011930:Reaction Time; D012737:Sex Factors; D013028:Space Perception