title: Choice of vasopressor in septic shock: does it matter?
abstract: Septic shock is a medical emergency that is associated with mortality rates of 40-70%. Prompt recognition and institution of effective therapy is required for optimal outcome. When the shock state persists after adequate fluid resuscitation, vasopressor therapy is required to improve and maintain adequate tissue/organ perfusion in an attempt to improve survival and prevent the development of multiple organ dysfunction and failure. Controversy surrounding the optimum choice of vasopressor strategy to utilize in the management of patients with septic shock continues. A recent randomized study of epinephrine compared to norepinephrine (plus dobutamine when indicated) leads to more questions than answers.
authors.affiliation: Rush Medical College, Rush University Medical Center, 1753 West Congress Parkway, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.
authors.forename: Gourang P
authors.initials: GP
authors.lastname: Patel
authors.forename: Robert A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Balk
mesh_terms: D002755:Choice Behavior; D006801:Humans; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Q000379:methods; D012772:Shock, Septic / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000503:physiopathology; D014662:Vasoconstrictor Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use*
chemical_list: D014662:Vasoconstrictor Agents