Osteochondral resurfacing (OCRPRC) for capitate chondrosis in proximal row carpectomy.
OBJECTIVE
Proximal row carpectomy (PRC) can be an effective treatment option for arthritis of the wrist, but the operation is contraindicated when there is substantial arthritis of the capitate head. We describe a new technique that involves resurfacing of the capitate when there is chondrosis by using osteochondral grafts harvested from the resected carpal bones. The purpose of this study was to assess the outcomes of patients who had osteochondral resurfacing in the setting of PRC (OCRPRC) for capitate chondrosis and to determine how they compare with published results of conventional PRC.


METHODS
Patients having PRC who had grade II to IV (Modified Outerbridge Scale) capitate chondrosis underwent osteochondral resurfacing of the capitate. Preoperative and postoperative pain level, employment status, range of motion (ROM), grip strength, and Mayo wrist scores were assessed, and Student's t-test was used. Postoperative Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) scores were also calculated.


RESULTS
Eight patients with an average age of 53 years were followed up for 18 months. Preoperatively, 7 patients described their pain as moderate to severe; postoperatively, 7 patients described their pain as mild to no pain. Preoperative arc of motion was 84 degrees (74% of the contralateral side); postoperative arc of motion was 75 degrees (66% of the contralateral side). Preoperative grip strength was 29 kg, or 62% of the contralateral side; postoperative grip strength was 34 kg, or 71% of the contralateral side. Preoperative Mayo wrist score was 51 ("poor"); postoperative Mayo wrist score was 68 ("fair"). Average postoperative DASH score was 19.5. Follow-up radiographs showed that 75% of patients had mild to no degeneration. Magnetic resonance imaging at 21 months postoperatively showed graft incorporation. No complications were encountered.


CONCLUSIONS
Our results with osteochondral resurfacing compare favorably with the published results of conventional PRC in terms of pain relief, employment status, ROM, and grip strength.
Tang
Peter
P
College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA. pt2214@columbia.edu
Imbriglia
Joseph E
JE
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D016025:Bone Transplantation; D051224:Capitate Bone / Q000601:surgery*; D002348:Carpal Bones / Q000601:surgery*; D002357:Cartilage Diseases / Q000145:classification / Q000601:surgery*; D002358:Cartilage, Articular / Q000637:transplantation; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D004651:Employment; D005260:Female; D018737:Hand Strength; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D019637:Orthopedic Procedures; D010147:Pain Measurement; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D014955:Wrist Joint / Q000601:surgery