Comparison of three spike detectors dedicated to single unit action potentials of the auditory nerve.
This paper compares three methods for the detection of single unit action potentials in auditory nerve. The detector structures are similar consisting of a filtering procedure in the first stage and a decision rule in the second stage. The detection accuracy of each detector is characterized by the couple probability of a true detection vs. rates of false detection with synthetic data. The performance comparison between detectors shows that the detector using a band-pass finite-impulse-response filter with complex coefficients offers the best performance. This observation was especially evident for low signal to noise ratios. This finding is confirmed with real data and leads us to revise the protocol of spike detection in auditory nerve.
Bourien
J
J
CREFA-Université Montpellier1, Institute of Neurosciences of Montpellier, INSERM U583, France. jerome.bourien@univ-montp1.fr
Ruel
J
J
Senhadji
L
L
Puel
J L
JL
D000200:Action Potentials / Q000502:physiology*; D000465:Algorithms; D000818:Animals; D003056:Cochlear Nerve / Q000502:physiology*; D003936:Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D004568:Electrodiagnosis / Q000379:methods*; D005072:Evoked Potentials, Auditory / Q000502:physiology*; D006168:Guinea Pigs; D010363:Pattern Recognition, Automated / Q000379:methods*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity