title: Techniques for the stabilization and assessment of treated copper-, chromium-, and arsenic-contaminated soil.
abstract: Remediation mainly based on excavation and burial of the contaminated soil is impractical with regard to the large numbers of sites identified as being in need of remediation. Therefore, alternative methods are needed for brownfield remediation. This study was conducted to assess a chemical stabilization procedure of CCA-contaminated soil using iron (Fe)-containing blaster sand (BS) or oxygen-scarfing granulate (OSG). The stabilization technique was assessed with regard to the feasibility of mixing ameliorants at an industrial scale and the efficiency of the stabilization under different redox conditions. The stability was investigated under natural conditions in 1-m3 lysimeters in a field experiment, and the effect of redox conditions was assessed in a laboratory experiment (10 L). The treatments with high additions of ameliorant (8% and 17%) were more successful in both the laboratory and field experiments, even though there was enough Fe on a stochiometric basis even at the lowest addition rates (0.1% and 1%). The particle size of the Fe and the mixing influenced the stabilization efficiency. The development of anaerobic conditions, simulated by water saturation, increases the fraction of arsenic (AsIII) and, consequently, As mobility. The use of high concentrations of OSG under aerobic conditions increased the concentrations of nickel (Ni) and copper (Cu) in the pore water. However, under anaerobic conditions, it decreased the As leaching compared with the untreated soil, and Ni and Cu leaching was not critical. The final destination of the treated soil should govern the amendment choice, that is, an OSG concentration of approximately 10% may be suitable if the soil is to be landfilled under anaerobic conditions. Alternatively, the soil mixed with 1% BS could be kept under aerobic conditions in a landfill cover or in situ at a brownfield site. In addition, the treatment with BS appeared to produce better effects in the long term than treatment with OSG.
authors.affiliation: Ramböll, Luleå, Sweden. christian.maurice@ramboll.se
authors.forename: Christian
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Maurice
authors.forename: Sofia
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Lidelöw
authors.forename: Björn
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Gustavsson
authors.forename: Anders
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Lättström
authors.forename: Daniel
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Ragnvaldsson
authors.forename: Per
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Leffler
authors.forename: Lars
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Lövgren
authors.forename: Solomon
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Tesfalidet
authors.forename: Jurate
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Kumpiene
mesh_terms: D001151:Arsenic / Q000737:chemistry*; D019216:Metals, Heavy / Q000737:chemistry*; D012989:Soil Pollutants / Q000737:chemistry*; D018505:Waste Management / Q000379:methods; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical / Q000032:analysis
chemical_list: D019216:Metals, Heavy; D012989:Soil Pollutants; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical; D001151:Arsenic