Self-administered cued naming therapy: a single-participant investigation of a computer-based therapy program replicated in four cases.
OBJECTIVE
This study examined the benefits of a self-administered, clinician-guided, computer-based, cued naming therapy. Results of intense and nonintense treatment schedules were compared.


METHODS
A single-participant design with multiple baselines across behaviors and varied treatment intensity for 2 trained lists was replicated over 4 participants. Two lists of words were treated sequentially. The same methods and equal numbers of treatment sessions were used, but the number of sessions per week differed across word lists: nonintense (2/week) or intense (5/week). Probes of performance on both word lists were carried out to examine acquisition, maintenance, and generalization.


RESULTS
There was strong evidence of improved naming (acquisition) of trained words in 3 of the 4 participants regardless of treatment intensity. There was strong evidence of maintenance for 1 participant and moderate evidence for the remaining 3 participants. Evidence of generalization to untrained words was weak.


CONCLUSIONS
Results suggest that self-administered, computer-based, cued naming therapy using a common mixed-cue protocol may be beneficial to a wide range of persons with aphasia regardless of treatment schedule. If results are replicated with a larger sample, treatments such as this may be a low-cost supplement or extension to traditional aphasia therapy.
Ramsberger
Gail
G
Department of Speech, Language & Hearing Sciences, UCB 409, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309-0409, USA. gail.ramsberger@colorado.edu
Marie
Basem
B
D000368:Aged; D001037:Aphasia / Q000209:etiology / Q000628:therapy*; D003201:Computers; D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D007808:Language Therapy / Q000379:methods*; D008875:Middle Aged; D012646:Self Administration; D020521:Stroke / Q000150:complications; D016896:Treatment Outcome