Qualitative science policy.
Qualitative research struggles against a tide of quantitative methods. To assist in this struggle, it is useful to consider the historical and philosophical origins of quantitative methods as well as criticisms that have been raised against them. Although these criticisms have often been restricted to discussions in the philosophy of science, they have become increasingly prominent in debates regarding science policy. This article thus reviews current science policy debates concerning scientific autonomy and the linear model of science-society relationships. Then, having considered the multiple meanings of quality, it argues for a science policy reassessment of quantitative research, for deeper engagements between science policy and the social sciences, and finally, for a more explicit alliance between science policy and qualitative methods.
Mitcham
Carl
C
Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado, USA. cmitcham@mines.edu
D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D006801:Humans; D010684:Philosophy; D011050:Policy Making; D017009:Professional Autonomy; D011640:Public Policy; D036301:Qualitative Research; D012586:Science / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D012942:Social Sciences / Q000592:standards; D012945:Social Values; D014481:United States