title: Inverting houses and textures: investigating the characteristics of learned inversion effects.
abstract: Faces, more than other objects, are identified more accurately when upright than inverted. This inversion effect may be linked to differences in expertise. Here, we explore how stimulus characteristics and expertise interact to determine the magnitude of inversion effects. Observers were trained to identify houses or textures. Inversion effects were not found with either stimulus before training, but were found following 5 days of practice. Additionally, the learning-induced inversion effects showed partial transfer to novel exemplars. Although similar amounts of learning were observed with both types of stimuli, inversion effects were significantly larger for textures. Our results suggest that the size of the inversion effect is not a reliable index of face-specific processing.
authors.affiliation: McMaster University, Department of Psychology, Neuroscience, and Behaviour, 1280 Main St. West, Hamilton, Ont., Canada L8S 4K1. huskjs@mcmaster.ca
authors.forename: Jesse S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Husk
authors.forename: Patrick J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Bennett
authors.forename: Allison B
authors.initials: AB
authors.lastname: Sekuler
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D015350:Contrast Sensitivity / Q000502:physiology; D003463:Cues; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D005556:Form Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual / Q000502:physiology; D011601:Psychophysics