title: Comparison of two Dutch follow-up care models for spinal cord-injured patients and their impact on health problems, re-admissions and quality of care.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate whether transmural care for people with spinal cord injury living in the community has more impact on health outcomes than traditional follow-up care within the Netherlands.
  
  
  METHODS
  Quasi-experiment with 12 months of follow-up.
  
  
  METHODS
  Eight Dutch rehabilitation centres.
  
  
  METHODS
  Thirty-one patients who received transmural care in two ;experimental' rehabilitation centres were compared with a matched sample of 31 patients having received ;usual follow-up care' in six other rehabilitation centres.
  
  
  METHODS
  The core component of the transmural care consists of a transmural nurse, who 'liaises' between former patients living in the community, primary care professionals and the rehabilitation team. The transmural care model provides activities to support patients and their family/partners and activities to promote continuity of care.
  
  
  METHODS
  The prevalence of pressure sores and urinary tract infections; the number and duration of re-admissions to hospital and rehabilitation centre due to pressure sores, bladder and bowel problems; and the experienced quality of follow-up care.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The transmural care, as implemented, did not influence the health outcomes. The prevalence of pressure sores, urinary tract infections and the number of re-admissions (due to pressure sores, bladder and bowel problems) was respectively 13, 13 and 4 in the intervention group versus 14, 15 and 6 in the usual follow-up care group. Since the transmural care had been incompletely implemented and there were methodological and practical limitations, we formulated no final conclusions regarding its effectiveness.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Implementing the transmural care model strictly according to protocol may improve its effectiveness.
authors.affiliation: Rehabilitation Centre Hoensbroeck, Hoensbroek, The Netherlands. j.bloemen@srl.nl
authors.forename: J H A
authors.initials: JH
authors.lastname: Bloemen-Vrencken
authors.forename: L P
authors.initials: LP
authors.lastname: de Witte
authors.forename: M W M
authors.initials: MW
authors.lastname: Post
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Pons
authors.forename: F W A
authors.initials: FW
authors.lastname: van Asbeck
authors.forename: L H V
authors.initials: LH
authors.lastname: van der Woude
authors.forename: W J A
authors.initials: WJ
authors.lastname: van den Heuvel
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003152:Community Health Nursing / Q000379:methods / Q000458:organization & administration*; D003266:Continuity of Patient Care; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017146:Models, Organizational; D009426:Netherlands; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; D010348:Patient Care Team / Q000458:organization & administration*; D010359:Patient Readmission / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D003668:Pressure Ulcer / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control; D015397:Program Evaluation; D019984:Quality Indicators, Health Care; D012047:Rehabilitation Centers / Q000458:organization & administration*; D013119:Spinal Cord Injuries / Q000150:complications / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D001745:Urinary Bladder Diseases / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control