EMS-initiated refusal of transport: the current state of affairs.
The objectives of this study were 1) to determine the number and characteristics of emergency medical services (EMS) agencies within the 200 largest US cities that sanction EMS-initiated refusal of transport; and 2) to determine the extent of no-cost alternative transport mechanisms among those agencies that allow EMS-initiated refusal of transport. EMS agencies located within the 200 largest US cities were contacted via telephone and surveyed as to whether their agency sanctioned EMS-initiated refusal of transport (EMS-IROT). Agencies with a policy were further questioned regarding its components and usage patterns. The telephone survey contacted 100% (200) of the target population. Currently, 7.0% (14) of EMS agencies have EMS-IROT protocols, with 64% (9) of those requiring direct medical oversight. Five (2.5%) of the 200 agencies sanctioned EMS-IROT without requiring online medical approval. Average annual call volume of the five agencies not requiring direct medical oversight was 70,800; their EMS-IROT protocols have been in existence a mean of 19.8 years. None of these agencies had a no-cost alternative transport mechanism. Three (1.5%) agencies terminated EMS-IROT protocols in the past. EMS-initiated refusal of transport continues to be a rare entity among US EMS agencies. Those that do not require direct medical oversight tend to have well-established programs, though no agency offered a formal no-cost alternative transport mechanism.
Knapp
Barry J
BJ
Department of Emergency Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, Virginia 23507-1999, USA.
Kerns
Brian L
BL
Riley
Ivan
I
Powers
James
J
D000552:Ambulances / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D004634:Emergency Medical Technicians; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D010347:Patient Care Planning; D011446:Prospective Studies; D014218:Triage / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D014481:United States