Effect of 24-hour mandatory versus on-demand critical care specialist presence on quality of care and family and provider satisfaction in the intensive care unit of a teaching hospital.
OBJECTIVE
The benefit of continuous on-site presence by a staff academic critical care specialist in the intensive care unit of a teaching hospital is not known. We compared the quality of care and patient/family and provider satisfaction before and after changing the staffing model from on-demand to continuous 24-hr critical care specialist presence in the intensive care unit.


METHODS
Two-year prospective cohort study of patient outcomes, processes of care, and family and provider survey of satisfaction, organization, and culture in the intensive care unit.


METHODS
Intensive care unit of a teaching hospital.


METHODS
Consecutive critically ill patients, their families, and their caregivers.


METHODS
Introduction of night-shift coverage to provide continuous 24-hr on-site, as opposed to on-demand, critical care specialist presence.


RESULTS
Of 2,622 patients included in the study, 1,301 were admitted before and 1,321 after the staffing model change. Baseline characteristics and adjusted intensive care unit and hospital mortality were similar between the two groups. The nonadherence to evidence-based care processes improved from 24% to 16% per patient-day after the staffing change (p = .002). The rate of intensive care unit complications decreased from 11% to 7% per patient-day (p = .023). When adjusted for predicted hospital length of stay, admission source, and do-not-resuscitate status, hospital length of stay significantly decreased during the second period (adjusted mean difference -1.4, 95% confidence interval -0.3 to -2.5 days, p = .017). The new model was considered optimal for patient care by the majority of the providers (78% vs. 38% before the intervention, p < .001). Family satisfaction was excellent during both study periods (mean score 5.87 +/- 1.7 vs. 5.95 +/- 2.0, p = .777).


CONCLUSIONS
The introduction of continuous (24-hr) on-site presence by a staff academic critical care specialist was associated with improved processes of care and staff satisfaction and decreased intensive care unit complication rate and hospital length of stay.
Gajic
Ognjen
O
Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA. gajic.ognjen@mayo.edu
Afessa
Bekele
B
Hanson
Andrew C
AC
Krpata
Tami
T
Yilmaz
Murat
M
Mohamed
Shehab F
SF
Rabatin
Jeffrey T
JT
Evenson
Laura K
LK
Aksamit
Timothy R
TR
Peters
Steve G
SG
Hubmayr
Rolf D
RD
Wylam
Mark E
ME
D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D015331:Cohort Studies; D003258:Consumer Behavior / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D003422:Critical Care; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D006784:Hospitals, Teaching; D006801:Humans; D007362:Intensive Care Units; D007588:Job Satisfaction; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008910:Minnesota; D009551:Night Care; D015279:Organizational Culture; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; D010561:Personnel Staffing and Scheduling; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011787:Quality of Health Care / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D000078329:Workforce