title: Public survey of financial incentives for kidney donation.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  One of the most fiercely debated strategies to increase the number of kidneys for transplantation is the introduction of financial incentives. As the success of such strategy largely depends on public support, we performed a public survey on this topic.
  
  
  METHODS
  We developed a questionnaire on financial incentives for living kidney donation. We investigated the public opinion on two different fixed compensations: either life-long health insurance compensation or 25,000 euros. Furthermore, we investigated public preferences on the practical implementation: either the patient seeks a donor or the donor registers for donation at an independent institute. For all examples, health insurance companies would cover costs of treatment. TNS NIPO, a professional organization for market research, sent the survey to a response panel that is made representative for the general population.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Five hundred fifty respondents (M/F: 60/40; median age: 46) filled out the questionnaire. Forty-six percent considered the situation wherein health insurance companies would introduce financial incentives to increase the number of living kidney donors undesirable (26% undesirable; 20% very undesirable), compared to 25% who perceived this as desirable (20% desirable; 5% very desirable). The option wherein the donor registers at an independent institute to donate to a patient on the list and in turn receives life-long health insurance compensation was chosen as most favourable. Of all respondents, 5.5% stated that there was a (very) great chance that they would donate a kidney in order to get compensation if such system were to be reality.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Although almost half of the respondents (46%) were reluctant towards introducing a system with fixed compensation to increase the number of living kidney donors, still 25% of the general public reacted positively.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medical Psychology & Psychotherapy, Erasmus University Medical Centre, 3000 CA Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, The Netherlands. L.Kranenburg@erasmusmc.nl
authors.forename: Leonieke
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Kranenburg
authors.forename: Andre
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Schram
authors.forename: Willij
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Zuidema
authors.forename: Wilem
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Weimar
authors.forename: Medard
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hilhorst
authors.forename: Ellen
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Hessing
authors.forename: Jan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Passchier
authors.forename: Jan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Busschbach
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D035881:Compensation and Redress; D003625:Data Collection; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D019458:Insurance Coverage / Q000191:economics; D016030:Kidney Transplantation / Q000191:economics* / Q000639:trends*; D019520:Living Donors; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009042:Motivation; D011639:Public Opinion; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D009927:Tissue and Organ Procurement / Q000191:economics* / Q000379:methods*