title: Comparative repeatability of guide-pin axis positioning in computer-assisted and manual femoral head resurfacing arthroplasty.
abstract: The orientation of the femoral component in hip resurfacing arthroplasty affects the likelihood of loosening and fracture. Computer-assisted surgery has been shown to improve significantly the surgeon's ability to achieve a desired position and orientation; nevertheless, both bias and variability in positioning remain and can potentially be improved. The authors recently developed a computer-assisted surgical (CAS) technique to guide the placement of the pin used in femoral head resurfacing arthroplasty and showed that it produced significantly less variation than a typical manual technique in varus/valgus placement relative to a preoperatively determined surgical plan while taking a comparable amount of time. In the present study, the repeatability of both the CAS and manual techniques is evaluated in order to estimate the relative contributions to overall variability of surgical technique (CAS versus manual), surgeon experience (novice versus experienced), and other sources of variability (e.g. across specimens and across surgeons). This will enable further improvements in the accuracy of CAS techniques. Three residents/fellows new to femoral head resurfacing and three experienced hip arthroplasty surgeons performed 20-30 repetitions of each of the CAS and manual techniques on at least one of four cadaveric femur specimens. The CAS system had markedly better repeatability (1.2 degrees) in varus/valgus placement relative to the manual technique (2.8 degrees), slightly worse repeatability in version (4.4 degrees versus 3.2 degrees), markedly better repeatability in mid-neck placement (0.7 mm versus 2.5 mm), no significant dependence on surgeon skill level (in contrast to the manual technique), and took significantly less time (50 s versus 123 s). Proposed improvements to the version measurement process showed potential for reducing the standard deviation by almost two thirds. This study supports the use of CAS for femoral head resurfacing as it is quicker than the manual technique, independent of surgeon experience, and demonstrates improved repeatability.
authors.affiliation: Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of British Columbia, 6250 Applied Sciences Lane, Vancouver, BC, Canada. ahodgson@mech.ubc.ca
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Hodgson
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Helmy
authors.forename: B A
authors.initials: BA
authors.lastname: Masri
authors.forename: N V
authors.initials: NV
authors.lastname: Greidanus
authors.forename: K B
authors.initials: KB
authors.lastname: Inkpen
authors.forename: C P
authors.initials: CP
authors.lastname: Duncan
authors.forename: D S
authors.initials: DS
authors.lastname: Garbuz
authors.forename: C
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Anglin
mesh_terms: D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D001858:Bone Nails; D005270:Femur Head / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012371:Robotics / Q000379:methods; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D025321:Surgery, Computer-Assisted / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis