What dot clusters and bar graphs reveal: subitizing is fast counting and subtraction.
In two studies, we found that dot enumeration tasks resulted in shallow-sloped response time (RT) functions for displays of 1-4 dots and steep-sloped functions for displays of 5-8 dots, replicating results implicating subitizing and counting processes for low and high ranges of dots, respectively. Extracting number from a specific type of bar graph within the same numerical range produced a shallow-sloped but scallop-shaped RT function. Factor analysis confirmed two independent subranges for dots, but all bar graph values defined a unitary factor. Significantly, factor scores and asymmetries both showed correlations of bar graph recognition to dot subitizing but not to dot counting, strongly suggesting that subitizing was used in both enumeration of low numbers of dots and bar graph recognition. According to these results, subitizing appears to be a nonverbal process operating flexibly in either additive or subtractive fashion on analog quantities having spatial extent, a conclusion consistent with a fast-counting model of subitizing but not with other models of the subitizing process.
Boles
David B
DB
Department of psychology, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35405, USA. dboles@bama.ua.edu
Phillips
Jeffrey B
JB
Givens
Somer M
SM
D005403:Fixation, Ocular; D006801:Humans; D008433:Mathematics; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011930:Reaction Time