title: Hospitalisation as an outcome measure in schizophrenia.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  People with schizophrenia comprise the majority of patients with severe mental illness recruited to recent mental health service studies of new teams (e.g. assertive outreach, crisis resolution). Reduction in hospitalisation has been the most consistent outcome measure in these studies, but results are inconsistent.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To understand inconsistency of results from studies using hospitalisation as an outcome measure.
  
  
  METHODS
  The advantages and disadvantages of hospitalisation are explored, including the ways in which it is recorded. Regional variation in outcomes and the impact of control services are reviewed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Hospitalisation has face validity as an outcome but translates poorly between differing healthcare contexts. These variations can be exploited positively to distinguish potentially effective ingredients in community care (outreach, combined health and social care, team structure) from redundant components.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Hospitalisation is a good proxy outcome measure in schizophrenia care in randomised controlled trials, but the dangers of extrapolating to new contexts require care.
authors.affiliation: University Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Headington, Oxford, UK. Tom.burns@psych.ox.ac.uk
authors.forename: Tom
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Burns
mesh_terms: D003158:Community Psychiatry / Q000191:economics* / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D005260:Female; D006760:Hospitalization / Q000191:economics* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D011569:Psychiatric Status Rating Scales / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011618:Psychotic Disorders / Q000191:economics / Q000628:therapy*; D011788:Quality of Life / Q000523:psychology; D012559:Schizophrenia / Q000191:economics / Q000628:therapy*; D016896:Treatment Outcome