Snoddy (1926) revisited: time scales of motor learning.
The authors investigated the time scales of the learning of a mirror-tracing task to reexamine G. S. Snoddy's (1926) original claim and the received theoretical view (A. Newell & P. S. Rosenbloom, 1981) that motor learning follows a power law. Adult participants (N = 16) learned the tracing task in either a normal or a reversed visual-image condition over 5 consecutive days of practice and then performed 1 day of practice 1 week later and again 1 month later. The reversed-image group's performance was poorer than that of the normal-image group throughout the practice. An exponential was the best fitting function on individual data, but the power-law function was the best fit on the group-averaged data. The findings provided preliminary evidence that 2 characteristic time scales, (a) fast, dominated by warm-up, and (b) slow, dominated by persistent change, capture individuals' performance in the learning of the mirror-tracing task.
Stratton
Shannon M
SM
Department of Kinesiology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, 16802, USA.
Liu
Yeou-Teh
YT
Hong
Siang Lee
SL
Mayer-Kress
Gottfried
G
Newell
Karl M
KM
D000328:Adult; D000465:Algorithms; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008954:Models, Biological; D009048:Motor Skills / Q000502:physiology*; D009949:Orientation / Q000502:physiology; D011214:Practice, Psychological; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology*; D012016:Reference Values; D013997:Time Factors; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology