Costs of two alternative Salmonella control policies in Finnish broiler production.
BACKGROUND
Costs and benefits of two Salmonella control policies for broiler production were described and compared. The control options were the Zoonosis Directive 92/117/EC and the more intense strategy, the Finnish Salmonella Control Programme (FSCP).


METHODS
The comparison included the Salmonella control costs in primary and secondary production and the direct and indirect losses due to Salmonella infections in humans in 2000.


RESULTS
The total annual costs of the FSCP were calculated to be 990 400 EUR (0.02 euro/kg broiler meat). The average control costs in the broiler production chain were seven times higher with the FSCP than with the Zoonosis Directive alone. However, the public health costs were 33 times higher with the Zoonosis Directive alone. The value of one prevented loss of life per year exceeded the annual control costs of the FSCP.


CONCLUSIONS
Due to significant savings in public health costs compared to costs of FSCP, the FSCP was found to be economically feasible.
Department of Food and Environmental Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, PO Box 66, Agnes Sjöberginkatu 2, FI-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland. susanna.kangas@iki.fi
Susanna
S
Kangas
Tapani
T
Lyytikäinen
Jukka
J
Peltola
Jukka
J
Ranta
Riitta
R
Maijala
D000818:Animals; D002645:Chickens; D003140:Communicable Disease Control / Q000191:economics*; D003257:Consumer Product Safety / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D005260:Female; D005387:Finland; D005506:Food Contamination; D005516:Food Microbiology; D006801:Humans; D011200:Poultry; D012478:Salmonella Food Poisoning / Q000191:economics / Q000517:prevention & control; D012481:Salmonella Infections, Animal / Q000191:economics* / Q000517:prevention & control*; D015047:Zoonoses