The local lymph node assay: current position in the regulatory classification of skin sensitizing chemicals.
The local lymph node assay (LLNA) is being used increasingly in the identification of skin sensitizing chemicals for regulatory purposes. In the context of new chemicals legislation (REACH) in Europe, it is the preferred assay. The rationale for this is that the LLNA quantitative and objective approach to skin sensitization testing allied with the important animal welfare benefits that the method offers. However, as with certain guinea pig sensitization tests before it, this increasing use also brings experience with an increasingly wide range of industrial and other chemicals where the outcome of the assay does not always necessarily meet with the expectations of those conducting it. Sometimes, the result appears to be a false negative, but rather more commonly, the complaint is that the chemical represents a false positive. Against this background we have here reviewed a number of instances where false positive and false negative results have been described and have sought to reconcile science with expectation. Based on these analyses, it is our conclusion that false positives and false negatives do occur in the LLNA, as they do with any other skin sensitization assay (and indeed with all tests used for hazard identification), and that this occurs for a number of reasons. We further conclude, however, that false positive results in the LLNA, as with the guinea pig maximization test, arise most commonly via failure to distinguish what is scientifically correct from that which is unpalatable. The consequences of this confusion are discussed in the article, particularly in relation to the need to integrate both potency measurement and risk assessments into classification and labelling schemes that aim to manage potential risks to human health.
Basketter
David A
DA
St John's Institute of Dermatology, St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK. david.basketter@ukonline.co.uk
Gerberick
G Frank
GF
Kimber
Ian
I
D000485:Allergens / Q000145:classification* / Q000633:toxicity*; D000818:Animals; D017449:Dermatitis, Allergic Contact; D005188:False Negative Reactions; D005189:False Positive Reactions; D006168:Guinea Pigs; D023441:Local Lymph Node Assay; D012882:Skin Tests / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards
D000485:Allergens