Comparing decay rates for accurate and false memories in the DRM paradigm.
Although previous studies have consistently reported different forgetting rates for true and false memory when tested with recall, studies comparing the rates of decay for true and false recognition have reported inconsistent results. The present study attempted to clarify this inconsistency by comparing forgetting rates for true and false recognition in addition to addressing methodological differences among the previous studies. Recognition of list items and critical lures was assessed at six delays (2, 5, 10, 15, and 20 min, and 2 days). A comparison of power function slopes across item type provided evidence of slope differences such that false recognition decayed more quickly than true recognition, which is inconsistent with predictions from activation/ source-monitoring and fuzzy tracetheories.
University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Jorie M
JM
Colbertr
Dawn M
DM
McBride
D006801:Humans; D011582:Psychological Theory; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012094:Repression, Psychology; D013997:Time Factors