The long-term results of endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal tibia for bone tumours.
We have investigated whether improvements in design have altered the outcome for patients undergoing endoprosthetic replacement of the proximal tibia following resection of a tumour. Survival of the implant and 'servicing' procedures have been documented using a prospective database. A total of 194 patients underwent a proximal tibial replacement, with 95 having a fixed-hinge design and 99 a rotating-hinge with a hydroxyapatite collar; their median age was 21.5 years (10 to 74). At a mean follow-up of 14.7 years (5 to 29), 115 patients remain alive. The risk of revision for any reason in the fixed-hinge group was 32% at five years, 61% at ten years and 75% at 15 and 20 years, and in the rotating-hinge group 12% at five years, 25% at ten years and 30% at 15 years. Aseptic loosening was the most common reason for revision in the fixed-hinge knees, fracture of the implant in the early design of rotating hinges and infection in the current version. The risk of revision for aseptic loosening in the fixed-hinge knees was 46% at ten years. This was reduced to 3% in the rotating-hinge knee with a hydroxyapatite collar. The cemented, rotating hinge design currently offers the best chance of long-term survival of the prosthesis.
Myers
G J C
GJ
Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Bristol Road South, Birmingham B31 2AP, UK.
Abudu
A T
AT
Carter
S R
SR
Tillman
R M
RM
Grimer
R J
RJ
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D017677:Age Distribution; D000368:Aged; D000671:Amputation, Surgical; D001859:Bone Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D002648:Child; D006801:Humans; D007720:Knee Prosthesis; D023821:Limb Salvage / Q000379:methods*; D008875:Middle Aged; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D016459:Prosthesis-Related Infections; D012086:Reoperation; D016019:Survival Analysis; D013977:Tibia / Q000601:surgery*; D016896:Treatment Outcome