False-positive interpretations in respiratory cytopathology: exemplary cases and literature review.
Pulmonary cytology has progressed over the past decades because of advancement in imaging studies and increased confidence of pathologists in cytomorphologic diagnosis. It has an overall sensitivity and specificity ranging from approximately 60 to 96%. However, even with the most conscientious laboratories, false-positive diagnoses of malignancy do occur in respiratory specimens, potentially resulting in unnecessary treatment and morbidity. Selected respiratory cytopathology cases with false-positive diagnoses are presented here, along with a review of pertinent literature and a discussion of possible steps to minimize the problem being considered.
Policarpio-Nicolas
Maria Luisa C
ML
Division of Surgical Pathology and Cytopathology, University of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville, Virginia 22908-0214, USA.
Wick
Mark R
MR
D000230:Adenocarcinoma / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000473:pathology; D018288:Carcinoma, Small Cell / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000473:pathology; D002294:Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000473:pathology; D003951:Diagnostic Errors; D005189:False Positive Reactions; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology; D008875:Middle Aged; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity