Falsely recalled items are rich in item-specific information.
Current theorizing suggests that critical lures in the Deese/Roediger-McDermott (DRM) procedure are often falsely remembered because they have received considerable relational processing (e.g., spreading activation or encoding of gist information). We used a repeated-testing paradigm to assess the amount of item-specific and relational processing given to the list items and the critical lures. Research has shown that items receiving item-specific processing are more likely to be recovered across successive tests. They are also output more slowly but more steadily throughout the recall period. In two experiments, we manipulated the processing performed on list items and then used item gains and cumulative recall curves to assess the amount of item-specific an drelational information encoded for both list items and lures. The results suggest that increasing the relational processing of list items increased item-specific processing of lures, whereas increasing item-specific processing of list items decreased item-specific processing of lures. We conclude that critical lures are typically rich in item-specific information, relative to list items.
Department of Psychology, Union College, Schenectady, New York 12308, USA. burnsd@union.edu
Daniel J
DJ
Burns
Carin L
CL
Jenkins
Erica E
EE
Dean
D006801:Humans; D011939:Mental Recall; D011581:Psychological Tests; D012094:Repression, Psychology; D012660:Semantics