Debate: Open radical prostatectomy vs. laparoscopic vs. robotic.
Surgical removal of clinically localized prostate cancer remains the most definitive treatment for the disease. The emergence of laparoscopic and robotic radical prostatectomy (RP) as alternatives to open RP has generated considerable discussion about the real and relative merits of each approach. Such was the topic of a debate that took place during the 2006 Society of Urologic Oncology meeting. The participants were Dr. William Catalona, Northwestern University, advocating for open RP, Dr. Betrand Guillonneau, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center advocating for laparoscopic RP, and Dr. Mani Menon, Henry Ford Hospital, advocating for robotic RP. The debate was moderated by Dr. Joel Nelson, University of Pittsburgh. This paper summarizes that debate.
Nelson
Joel B
JB
Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15232, USA. nelsonjb@upmc.edu
D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods; D007902:Length of Stay; D008297:Male; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D011468:Prostatectomy / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D012371:Robotics / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods