Power and public participation in a hazardous waste dispute: a community case study.
Qualitative case study findings are presented. We examined whether public participation in a hazardous waste dispute manifested in ways consistent with theories of social power; particularly whether participatory processes or participants' experiences of them were consistent with the three-dimensional view of power (Gaventa, Power and powerlessness: quiescence and rebellion in an appalacian valley, 1980; Lukes, Power: A radical view, 1974; Parenti, Power and the powerless, 1978). Findings from four data sources collected over 3 years revealed that participatory processes manifested in ways consistent with theories of power, and participants' experiences reflected this. Results illustrated how participation was limited and how citizen influence could be manipulated via control of resources, barriers to participation, agenda setting, and shaping conceptions about what participation was possible. Implications for community research and policy related to participation in hazardous waste disputes are discussed.
Culley
Marci R
MR
Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, P.O. Box 5010, Atlanta, GA 30302-5010, USA. mculley@gsu.edu
Hughey
Joseph
J
D003256:Community Participation; D003657:Decision Making; D034462:Dissent and Disputes; D006256:Hazardous Waste; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008923:Missouri; D011209:Power, Psychological; D011640:Public Policy; D036301:Qualitative Research
D006256:Hazardous Waste