title: Performance of residents and anesthesiologists in a simulation-based skill assessment.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Anesthesiologists and anesthesia residents are expected to acquire and maintain skills to manage a wide range of acute intraoperative anesthetic events. The purpose of this study was to determine whether an inventory of simulated intraoperative scenarios provided a reliable and valid measure of anesthesia residents' and anesthesiologists' skill.
  
  
  METHODS
  Twelve simulated acute intraoperative scenarios were designed to assess the performance of 64 residents and 35 anesthesiologists. The participants were divided into four groups based on their training and experience. There were 31 new CA-1, 12 advanced CA-1, and 22 CA-2/CA-3 residents as well as a group of 35 experienced anesthesiologists who participated in the assessment. Each participant managed a set of simulated events. The advanced CA-1 residents, CA-2/CA-3 residents, and 35 anesthesiologists managed 8 of 12 intraoperative simulation exercises. The 31 CA-1 residents each managed 3 intraoperative scenarios.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The new CA-1 residents received lower scores on the simulated intraoperative events than the other groups of participants. The advanced CA-1 residents, CA-2/CA-3 residents, and anesthesiologists performed similarly on the overall assessment. There was a wide range of scores obtained by individuals in each group. A number of the exercises were difficult for the majority of participants to recognize and treat, but most events effectively discriminated among participants who achieved higher and lower overall scores.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This simulation-based assessment provided a valid method to distinguish the skills of more experienced anesthesia residents and anesthesiologists from residents in early training. The overall score provided a reliable measure of a participant's ability to recognize and manage simulated acute intraoperative events. Additional studies are needed to determine whether these simulation-based assessments are valid measures of clinical performance.
authors: Washington University Clinical Simulation Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110, USA. murrayd@wust.edu
authors: David J
authors: DJ
authors: Murray
authors: John R
authors: JR
authors: Boulet
authors: Michael
authors: M
authors: Avidan
authors: Joseph F
authors: JF
authors: Kras
authors: Bernadette
authors: B
authors: Henrichs
authors: Julie
authors: J
authors: Woodhouse
authors: Alex S
authors: AS
authors: Evers
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D000776:Anesthesiology / Q000193:education / Q000592:standards*; D002983:Clinical Competence / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D003198:Computer Simulation; D003422:Critical Care / Q000592:standards; D004521:Educational Measurement / Q000379:methods*; D004582:Electronics, Medical / Q000295:instrumentation; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007396:Internship and Residency / Q000592:standards*; D007430:Intraoperative Care / Q000592:standards*; D007431:Intraoperative Complications; D008297:Male; D008348:Manikins; D018794:Problem-Based Learning; D011594:Psychometrics / Q000295:instrumentation; D012107:Research Design; D013044:Specialty Boards; D013997:Time Factors; D014743:Videotape Recording