title: Why do delayed summaries improve metacomprehension accuracy?
abstract: We showed that metacomprehension accuracy improved when participants (N=87 college students) wrote summaries of texts prior to judging their comprehension; however, accuracy only improved when summaries were written after a delay, not when written immediately after reading. We evaluated two hypotheses proposed to account for this delayed-summarization effect (the accessibility hypothesis and the situation model hypothesis). The data suggest that participants based metacomprehension judgments more on the gist of texts when they generated summaries after a delay; whereas, they based judgments more on details when they generated summaries immediately after reading. Focusing on information relevant to the situation model of a text (the gist of a text) produced higher levels of metacomprehension accuracy, which is consistent with situation model hypothesis.
authors: College of DuPage, 425 Fawell Boulevard, Glen Ellyn, Illinois 60137, United States.
authors: Mary C M
authors: MC
authors: Anderson
authors: Keith W
authors: KW
authors: Thiede
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D003071:Cognition; D032882:Comprehension; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011932:Reading; D012647:Self-Assessment; D013997:Time Factors