title: Pay for performance in thoracic surgery.
abstract: In the context of improving the quality of the medical practice, PFP programs have been developed to reward best medical practice. Early studies showed little gain in quality after implementing PFP family practice programs and some unintended consequences, like excluding high-risk patients from medical services when good outcomes were linked to payment. To date, no PFP programs have been implemented in surgical practice, but it is expected that value-based purchasing philosophy will be extended to surgical specialties in the near future. Quality initiatives in surgery can be based on outcome or process measures. Outcomes-focused quality approaches rely on accurate information obtained from multiinstitutional clinical databases for calculation of risk-adjusted models. Primary outcomes such surgical mortality are uncommon in modern thoracic surgery and outcome measures should rely on more prevalent intermediate outcomes such as specific postoperative morbidities or emergency readmission. Process-based quality approaches need to be based on scientific evidence linking process to outcomes. It is our responsibility to develop practice guidelines or international practice consensus to facilitate the parameters to be evaluated in the near future.
authors: Service of Thoracic Surgery, Salamanca UniversitY Hospital, Salamanca, Paseo San Vicente 58 182 Salamanca, Spain. gvs@usal.es
authors: Gonzalo
authors: G
authors: Varela
mesh_terms: D004650:Employee Performance Appraisal / Q000191:economics*; D006801:Humans; D008505:Medical Staff, Hospital / Q000191:economics*; D012456:Salaries and Fringe Benefits / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D013030:Spain; D013903:Thoracic Surgery / Q000191:economics*