title: EUS-guided FNA diagnosis of pancreatic endocrine tumors: new trends identified.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Pancreatic endocrine tumors (PETs) are rare (1 per 100,000 population) and are thought to be functioning in up to 85% of cases and are generally less than 2 cm in size. By previous reports, 15% to 50% of PETs are nonfunctioning and are discovered either incidentally or by symptom evaluation from a mass effect. EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) has been shown to accurately diagnose PETs and to localize tumors for surgical resection.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To describe a single-center experience of EUS-FNA diagnosis of PETs and its impact on surgical management.
  
  
  METHODS
  Retrospective cohort study.
  
  
  METHODS
  University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patients with PETs diagnosed via EUS-FNA over a 4-year period were identified through the authors' EUS database. Clinical history, laboratory values, diagnostic studies, EUS findings, cytology, pathology, operative records, and surgical pathology records were reviewed.
  
  
  METHODS
  Impact of definitive preoperative diagnosis of PET on surgical management.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Forty-one patients were diagnosed by EUS-FNA with PET. Thirty-five PETs were nonfunctioning PET; 6 were functioning PET. The mean tumor sizes of functioning and nonfunctioning PETs were 19 mm and 28 mm, respectively. The majority of tumors were located in the pancreatic head. Surgery was performed in 78% of patients; of these, 34% were resected laparoscopipcally.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Retrospective design and selection bias.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  In this study, nonfunctioning PETs were more commonly diagnosed compared with functioning PETs. In addition, the PETs were smaller than previously reported, likely because of increasing detection of incidental lesions through widespread use of abdominal imaging.
authors.affiliation: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.
authors.forename: Niraj
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Jani
authors.forename: Asif
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Khalid
authors.forename: Neeraj
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Kaushik
authors.forename: Debra
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Brody
authors.forename: Kathy
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Bauer
authors.forename: Karen
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Schoedel
authors.forename: N Paul
authors.initials: NP
authors.lastname: Ohori
authors.forename: A James
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Moser
authors.forename: Kenneth
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Lee
authors.forename: Kevin
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: McGrath
mesh_terms: D044963:Biopsy, Fine-Needle; D018278:Carcinoma, Neuroendocrine / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology*; D019160:Endosonography; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008198:Lymph Nodes / Q000473:pathology; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010190:Pancreatic Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology*; D012189:Retrospective Studies