title: Hospital ownership and quality of care: what explains the different results in the literature?
abstract: This systematic review examines what factors explain the diversity of findings regarding hospital ownership and quality. We identified 31 observational studies written in English since 1990 that used multivariate analysis to examine quality of care at nonfederal general acute, short-stay US hospitals. We find that pooled estimates of ownership effects are sensitive to the subset of studies included and the extent of overlap among hospitals analyzed in the underlying studies. Ownership does appear to be systematically related to differences in quality among hospitals in several contexts. Whether studies find for-profit and government-controlled hospitals to have higher mortality rates or rates of adverse events than their nonprofit counterparts depends on data sources, time period, and region covered. Policymakers should be aware of the underlying reasons for conflicting evidence in this literature, and the strengths and weaknesses of meta-analytic synthesis. The 'true' effect of ownership appears to depend on institutional context, including differences across regions, markets, and over time.
authors.affiliation: Walter H. Shorenstein Asia-Pacific Research Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
authors.forename: Karen
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Eggleston
authors.forename: Yu-Chu
authors.initials: YC
authors.lastname: Shen
authors.forename: Joseph
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Lau
authors.forename: Christopher H
authors.initials: CH
authors.lastname: Schmid
authors.forename: Jia
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Chan
mesh_terms: D017052:Hospital Mortality; D006777:Hospitals, Proprietary / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards*; D006779:Hospitals, Public / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D010067:Ownership; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D012044:Regression Analysis; D014481:United States / Q000453:epidemiology