Schedule discrimination in a mixed schedule: implications for models of the variable-ratio, variable-interval rate difference.
In Experiment 1, each of three humans knowledgeable about operant schedules used mouse clicks to respond to a "work key" presented on a monitor. On a random half of the presentations, work-key responses that completed a variable ratio (VR) 12 produced a tone. After five tones, the work key was replaced by two report keys. Pressing the right or left report key, respectively, added or subtracted yen50 from a counter and produced the work key. On the other half of the presentations, a variable interval (VI) associated with the work key was defined so its interreinforcer intervals approximated the time it took to complete the variable ratio. After five tone-producing completions of this schedule, the report keys were presented. Left or right report-key presses, respectively, added or subtracted yen50 from the counter. Subjects achieved high yen totals. In Experiment 2, the procedure was changed by requiring an interresponse time after completion of the variable interval that approximated the duration of the reinforced interresponse time on the variable ratio. Prior to beginning, subjects were shown how a sequence of response bouts and pauses could be used to predict schedule type. Subjects again achieved high levels of accuracy. These results show humans can discriminate ratio from interval schedules even when those schedules provide the same rate of reinforcement and reinforced interresponse times.
Silberberg
Alan
A
Department of Psychology, American University, Washington, DC 20016-8062, United States. asilber@american.edu
Goto
Kazuhiro
K
Hachiga
Yosuke
Y
Tanno
Takayuki
T
D001245:Association Learning; D032762:Autoexperimentation; D003216:Conditioning, Operant; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011930:Reaction Time; D012016:Reference Values; D012055:Reinforcement Schedule; D012201:Reward; D013998:Time Perception