title: Diagnostic hypothesis generation and human judgment.
abstract: Diagnostic hypothesis-generation processes are ubiquitous in human reasoning. For example, clinicians generate disease hypotheses to explain symptoms and help guide treatment, auditors generate hypotheses for identifying sources of accounting errors, and laypeople generate hypotheses to explain patterns of information (i.e., data) in the environment. The authors introduce a general model of human judgment aimed at describing how people generate hypotheses from memory and how these hypotheses serve as the basis of probability judgment and hypothesis testing. In 3 simulation studies, the authors illustrate the properties of the model, as well as its applicability to explaining several common findings in judgment and decision making, including how errors and biases in hypothesis generation can cascade into errors and biases in judgment.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of Oklahoma, Norman 73019, USA. rthomas@psychology.ou.edu
authors.forename: Rick P
authors.initials: RP
authors.lastname: Thomas
authors.forename: Michael R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Dougherty
authors.forename: Amber M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Sprenger
authors.forename: J Isaiah
authors.initials: JI
authors.lastname: Harbison
mesh_terms: D004777:Environment; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D008960:Models, Psychological