Policy and practice of occupational rehabilitation in Hong Kong and Guangzhou--a comparative study.
The objective of this paper is to compare social policy on occupational rehabilitation services in two mega industrial cities in southern China: Hong Kong and Guangzhou. Comparative policy study was employed as the research and analytical method in this paper. Aim, finance, target, coverage, organization and administration, service delivery and provision of the occupational rehabilitation policy and its linkages with industrial injury compensation system and re-employment policy in the two cities were critically reviewed and compared. The results of the study reflect that the Guangzhou policy is more aggressive and more tailor-made to the specific needs of occupational rehabilitation compared to the Hong Kong policy, whereas occupational rehabilitation in Hong Kong has long been developed and knowledge and skills in the occupational rehabilitation service are more mature and fruitful. Based on the research findings, it is concluded that through experience sharing and exchange, there will be more mutual understanding regarding the system, practice, success, faults and limitations in the two cities, as well as awareness of alternative courses of action. These will help in the better development of occupational rehabilitation services with the aims to safeguard the rights and wellbeing of workers in both cities.
Chan
Kan Kam
KK
Hong Kong College of Technology, Hong Kong. Director, Hong Kong Workers' Health Centre, Hong Kong. ytlamb@nevigator.com
D002681:China; D006723:Hong Kong; D006801:Humans; D011057:Politics; D011640:Public Policy; D012050:Rehabilitation, Vocational