title: Women, behavior, and evolution: understanding the debate between feminist evolutionists and evolutionary psychologists.
abstract: Often since the early 1990s, feminist evolutionists have criticized evolutionary psychologists, finding fault in their analyses of human male and female reproductive behavior. Feminist evolutionists have criticized various evolutionary psychologists for perpetuating gender stereotypes, using questionable methodology, and exhibiting a chill toward feminism. Though these criticisms have been raised many times, the conflict itself has not been fully analyzed. Therefore, I reconsider this conflict, both in its origins and its implications. I find that the approaches and perspectives of feminist evolutionists and evolutionary psychologists are distinctly different, leading many of the former to work in behavioral ecology, primatology, and evolutionary biology. Invitingly to feminist evolutionists, these three fields emphasize social behavior and the influences of environmental variables; in contrast, evolutionary psychology has come to rely on assumptions deemphasizing the pliability of psychological mechanisms and the flexibility of human behavior. In behavioral ecology, primatology, and evolutionary biology, feminist evolutionists have found old biases easy to correct and new hypotheses practical to test, offering new insights into male and female behavior, explaining the emergence and persistence of patriarchy, and potentially bringing closer a prime feminist goal, sexual equality.
authors.affiliation: Department of Political Science, Lewis University, Romeoville, IL 60446, USA. liesenla@lewisu.edu
authors.forename: Laurette T
authors.initials: LT
authors.lastname: Liesen
mesh_terms: D001519:Behavior; D005075:Biological Evolution; D005260:Female; D019513:Feminism; D006801:Humans; D011584:Psychology / Q000379:methods*; D012725:Sexual Behavior; D014930:Women / Q000523:psychology*