A reconceptualization of the somatoform disorders.
Since its introduction in DSM-III, the Somatoform Disorders category has been a subject of controversy. Critics of the grouping have claimed that it promotes dualism, assumes psychogenesis, and that it contains heterogeneous disorders that lack validity. The history of these disorders is one of shifting conceptualizations and disputes. A number of changes in the classification have been proposed, but few address problems that arise with the current formulation. The authors propose a dimensional reconceptualization based on marked and persistent somatic distress and care-eliciting behavior. This formulation is based on the interpersonal model of somatization. The authors propose testing of this conceptualization and indicate how this might be done.
Noyes
Russell
R
Dept. of Psychiatry, Carver College of Medicine, IA City, IA, USA. russell-noyes@uiowa.edu
Stuart
Scott P
SP
Watson
David B
DB
D039721:Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; D006801:Humans; D006998:Hypochondriasis / Q000145:classification / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology; D007046:Hysteria / Q000145:classification / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology; D038801:International Classification of Diseases; D019962:Reactive Attachment Disorder / Q000145:classification / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology; D012803:Sick Role; D013001:Somatoform Disorders / Q000145:classification* / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology