title: Care management for depression in primary care practice: findings from the RESPECT-Depression trial.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  This qualitative study examined the barriers to adopting depression care management among 42 primary care clinicians in 30 practices.
  
  
  METHODS
  The RESPECT-Depression trial worked collaboratively with 5 large health care organizations (and 60 primary care practices) to implement and disseminate an evidence-based intervention. This study used semistructured interviews with 42 primary care clinicians from 30 practice sites, 18 care managers, and 7 mental health professionals to explore experience and perceptions with depression care management for patients. Subject selection in 4 waves of interviews was driven by themes emerging from ongoing data analysis.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Primary care clinicians reported broad appreciation of the benefits of depression care management for their patients. Lack of reimbursement and the competing demands of primary care were often cited as barriers. These clinicians at many levels of initial enthusiasm for care management increased their enthusiasm after experiencing care management through the project. Psychiatric oversight of the care manager with suggestions for the clinicians was widely seen as important and appropriate by clinicians, care managers, and psychiatrists. Clinicians and care managers emphasized the importance of establishing effective communication among themselves, as well as maintaining a consistent and continuous relationship with the patients. The clinicians were selective in which patients they referred for care management, and there was wide variation in opinion about which patients were optimal candidates. Care managers were able to operate both from within a practice and more centrally when specific attention was given to negotiating communication strategies with a clinician.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Care management for depression is an attractive option for most primary care clinicians. Lack of reimbursement remains the single greatest obstacle to more widespread adoption.
authors.affiliation: The Center for Research Strategies, Denver, Colorado 80203, USA. Paul.Nutting@CRSLLC.org
authors.forename: Paul A
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: Nutting
authors.forename: Kaia
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Gallagher
authors.forename: Kim
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Riley
authors.forename: Suzanne
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: White
authors.forename: W Perry
authors.initials: WP
authors.lastname: Dickinson
authors.forename: Neil
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Korsen
authors.forename: Allen
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Dietrich
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D003863:Depression / Q000628:therapy*; D006801:Humans; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D010346:Patient Care Management / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D010349:Patient Compliance / Q000523:psychology; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods / Q000458:organization & administration*; D036301:Qualitative Research; D012052:Reimbursement, Incentive / Q000706:statistics & numerical data / Q000639:trends; D013997:Time Factors; D016526:Workload / Q000523:psychology