Functional morphology of the pharyngeal jaw apparatus in moray eels.
Moray eels (Muraenidae) are a relatively large group of anguilliform fishes that are notable for their crevice-dwelling lifestyle and renowned for their ability to consume large prey. Morays apprehend their prey by biting and then transport prey by extreme protraction and retraction of their pharyngeal jaw apparatus. Here, we present a detailed interpretation of the mechanisms of pharyngeal jaw transport based on work with Muraena retifera. We also review what is known of the moray pharyngeal jaw apparatus from the literature and provide comparative data on the pharyngeal jaw elements and kinematics for other moray species to determine whether interspecific differences in morphology and behavior are present. Rather than comprising broad upper and lower processing tooth plates, the pharyngeal jaws of muraenine and uropterygiine morays, are long and thin and possess large, recurved teeth. Compared with the muraenines, the pharyngobranchials of the uropterygiines do not possess a horn-shaped process and their connection to the fourth epibranchial is dorsal rather than medial. In addition, the lower tooth plates do not exhibit a lateral groove that serves as a site of muscle attachment for the pharyngocleitheralis and the ventral rather than the lateral side of the lower tooth plate attaches to the fourth ceratobranchial. In all morays, the muscles positioned for protraction and retraction of the pharyngeal apparatus have undergone elongation, while maintaining the generalized attachment sites on the bones of the skull and axial skeleton. Uropterygiines lack a dorsal retractor muscle and we presume that retraction of the pharyngeal jaws is achieved by the pharyngocleitheralis and the esophagus. The fifth branchial adductor is greatly hypertrophied in all species examined, suggesting that morays can strongly adduct the pharyngeal jaws during prey transport. The kinematics of biting behavior during prey capture and transport resulted in similar magnitudes of cranial movements although the timing of kinematic events was significantly different and the duration of transport was twice as long as prey capture. We speculate that morays have evolved this alternative prey transport strategy as a means of overcoming gape constraints, while hunting in the confines of coral reefs.
Mehta
Rita S
RS
Section of Evolution and Ecology, University of California, Davis, California 95616, USA. rsmehta@ucdavis.edu
Wainwright
Peter C
PC
D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D000818:Animals; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D001934:Branchial Region / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000502:physiology; D003679:Deglutition / Q000502:physiology*; D004524:Eels / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000502:physiology; D005247:Feeding Behavior / Q000502:physiology; D007568:Jaw / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000502:physiology; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology; D010614:Pharynx / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000502:physiology; D011235:Predatory Behavior / Q000502:physiology; D011859:Radiography; D013045:Species Specificity