A Bayesian framework for comparative quantitative genetics.
Bayesian approaches have been extensively used in animal breeding sciences, but similar approaches in the context of evolutionary quantitative genetics have been rare. We compared the performance of Bayesian and frequentist approaches in estimation of quantitative genetic parameters (viz. matrices of additive and dominance variances) in datasets typical of evolutionary studies and traits differing in their genetic architecture. Our results illustrate that it is difficult to disentangle the relative roles of different genetic components from small datasets, and that ignoring, e.g. dominance is likely to lead to biased estimates of additive variance. We suggest that a natural summary statistic for G-matrix comparisons can be obtained by examining how different the underlying multinormal probability distributions are, and illustrate our approach with data on the common frog (Rana temporaria). Furthermore, we derive a simple Monte Carlo method for computation of fraternity coefficients needed for the estimation of dominance variance, and use the pedigree of a natural Siberian jay (Perisoreus infaustus) population to illustrate that the commonly used approximate values can be substantially biased.
Ovaskainen
Otso
O
Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, PO Box 65, F1-00014, University of Helsinki, Finland. otso.ovaskainen@helsinki.fi
Cano
José Manuel
JM
Merilä
Juha
J
D000818:Animals; D001499:Bayes Theorem; D005075:Biological Evolution; D049628:Body Size; D003198:Computer Simulation; D005828:Genetics, Population / Q000379:methods*; D008957:Models, Genetic; D009010:Monte Carlo Method; D010375:Pedigree; D011896:Rana temporaria / Q000235:genetics*; D013623:Tail / Q000033:anatomy & histology