title: The development of PIPA: an integrated and automated pipeline for genome-wide protein function annotation.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Automated protein function prediction methods are needed to keep pace with high-throughput sequencing. With the existence of many programs and databases for inferring different protein functions, a pipeline that properly integrates these resources will benefit from the advantages of each method. However, integrated systems usually do not provide mechanisms to generate customized databases to predict particular protein functions. Here, we describe a tool termed PIPA (Pipeline for Protein Annotation) that has these capabilities.
  
  
  RESULTS
  PIPA annotates protein functions by combining the results of multiple programs and databases, such as InterPro and the Conserved Domains Database, into common Gene Ontology (GO) terms. The major algorithms implemented in PIPA are: (1) a profile database generation algorithm, which generates customized profile databases to predict particular protein functions, (2) an automated ontology mapping generation algorithm, which maps various classification schemes into GO, and (3) a consensus algorithm to reconcile annotations from the integrated programs and databases.PIPA's profile generation algorithm is employed to construct the enzyme profile database CatFam, which predicts catalytic functions described by Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers. Validation tests show that CatFam yields average recall and precision larger than 95.0%. CatFam is integrated with PIPA. We use an association rule mining algorithm to automatically generate mappings between terms of two ontologies from annotated sample proteins. Incorporating the ontologies' hierarchical topology into the algorithm increases the number of generated mappings. In particular, it generates 40.0% additional mappings from the Clusters of Orthologous Groups (COG) to EC numbers and a six-fold increase in mappings from COG to GO terms. The mappings to EC numbers show a very high precision (99.8%) and recall (96.6%), while the mappings to GO terms show moderate precision (80.0%) and low recall (33.0%). Our consensus algorithm for GO annotation is based on the computation and propagation of likelihood scores associated with GO terms. The test results suggest that, for a given recall, the application of the consensus algorithm yields higher precision than when consensus is not used.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The algorithms implemented in PIPA provide automated genome-wide protein function annotation based on reconciled predictions from multiple resources.
authors.affiliation: Biotechnology HPC Software Applications Institute, Telemedicine and Advanced Technology Research Center, US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, Ft. Detrick, MD, USA. cyu@bioanalysis.org
authors.forename: Chenggang
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Yu
authors.forename: Nela
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Zavaljevski
authors.forename: Valmik
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Desai
authors.forename: Seth
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Johnson
authors.forename: Fred J
authors.initials: FJ
authors.lastname: Stevens
authors.forename: Jaques
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Reifman
mesh_terms: D000465:Algorithms; D000595:Amino Acid Sequence; D019295:Computational Biology / Q000379:methods*; D030562:Databases, Protein; D010363:Pattern Recognition, Automated / Q000379:methods*; D011506:Proteins / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology*; D040901:Proteomics / Q000379:methods*; D013329:Structure-Activity Relationship
chemical_list: D011506:Proteins