Randomized controlled trials in health technology assessment: overkill or overdue?
Evidence-based medicine has become a cornerstone in the development of radiation oncology and the randomized controlled phase III trial remains the gold standard for assessing differential benefits in clinical outcome between therapies. Health technologies aimed at improving treatment quality should primarily be tested using process measures or operational characteristics, the reason being that the sensitivity and specificity of clinical outcome is low for detecting quality improvements. The ongoing discussion of the relative merits of intensity modulated photon versus proton radiotherapy is used to illustrate these concepts. Concerns over clinical and individual equipoise as well as the potential limitations of health economics considerations in this setting are also discussed. Working in a technology and science based medical discipline, radiation oncology researchers need to further develop methodology for critical assessment of health technologies as a complement to randomized controlled trials.
Bentzen
Søren M
SM
Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI 53792, USA. bentzen@humonc.wise.edu
D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D006801:Humans; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D018787:Radiation Oncology; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Q000191:economics; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical / Q000191:economics