title: Writing about emotions versus goals: effects on hostility and medical care utilization moderated by emotional approach coping processes.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The study compared emotionally disclosive writing and writing about goals as the 'best possible self' to a control condition and evaluated coping through emotional processing (EP) and expression (EE) as moderators of effects at 1-month follow-up.
  
  
  METHODS
  Undergraduates (N=63) were randomly assigned to emotional disclosure (EMO), best possible self (BPS), or a control condition (CTL). Outcomes were hostility, medical visits, depressive symptoms, physical symptoms, and blood pressure.
  
  
  RESULTS
  At 1 month, hostility decreased in high-EP participants in EMO relative to BPS and decreased in low-EP participants in BPS relative to EMO. Low-EP participants had fewer medical visits in BPS, whereas high-EP participants had more visits in BPS relative to other conditions.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Benefits may accrue when the expressive task is matched to the individual's preferred coping strategy.
authors.affiliation: University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas, USA.
authors.forename: Jennifer L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Austenfeld
authors.forename: Annette L
authors.initials: AL
authors.lastname: Stanton
mesh_terms: D000223:Adaptation, Psychological; D000328:Adult; D019260:Expressed Emotion; D005260:Female; D006040:Goals; D006296:Health Services / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006791:Hostility; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D014956:Writing