Interactions between cognition, compression, and listening conditions: effects on speech-in-noise performance in a two-channel hearing aid.
This study which included 23 experienced hearing aid users replicated several of the experiments reported in Gatehouse et al (2003, 2006) with new speech test material, language, and test procedure. The performance measure used was SNR required for 80% correct words in a sentence test. Consistent with Gatehouse et al, this study indicated that subjects showing a low score in a cognitive test (visual letter monitoring) performed better in the speech recognition test with slow time constants than with fast time constants, and performed better in unmodulated noise than in modulated noise, while subjects with high scores on the cognitive test showed the opposite pattern. Furthermore, cognitive test scores were significantly correlated with the differential advantage of fast-acting versus slow-acting compression in conditions of modulated noise. The pure tone average threshold explained 30% of the variance in aided speech recognition in noise under relatively simple listening conditions, while cognitive test scores explained about 40% of the variance under more complex, fluctuating listening conditions, where the pure tone average explained less than 5% of the variance. This suggests that speech recognition under steady-state noise conditions may underestimate the role of cognition in real-life listening.
Lunner
Thomas
T
Oticon A/S, Research Centre Eriksholm, Denmark. tlu@oticon.dk
Sundewall-Thorén
Elisabet
E
D001298:Audiology / Q000295:instrumentation; D001301:Audiometry, Pure-Tone; D003071:Cognition; D006310:Hearing Aids; D006801:Humans; D009622:Noise / Q000009:adverse effects; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011594:Psychometrics; D013067:Speech Perception; D014796:Visual Perception