title: No problem for Aristotle's subject and predicate.
abstract: It is argued that, in the traditional subject-predicate sentence, two interpretations of the subject term coexist, one intensional and the other extensional, which explains the superficial difference between the traditional S-P relation and the predication of predicate logic. Data from psychological studies of syllogistic reasoning support the view that the contrast between predicate and argument is carried over to the traditional S-P sentence.
authors.affiliation: Psychologie Cognitive, Université de Paris VIII, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, 93526 Saint-Denis, France politzer@univ-paris8.fr.
authors.forename: Guy
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Politzer