[Surgery training of gynecologic residents: master and student in the operating room].
OBJECTIVE
Describe the surgical training of gynecologic residents in the operating room, by collecting the opinion of French gynecologists.


METHODS
A questionnaire investigating this subject was put on a web site. Every French gynecologist could answer the questionnaire from a duration of six months. The data of the inquiry were studied by comparing five groups: residents (group 1), fellows (group 2), seniors of public hospital (group 3), and seniors of private hospitals (group 4), or, groups 2, 3 and 4 together, as Group A.


RESULTS
Six hundred and fifty-seven gynecologists answered the inquiry. For the residents, lack of time and senior's weak educational motivation are the explanations most frequently retained in order to explain that residents do not operate. For group A, it is rather the residents' skills which is the most important fact to have residents operate. Residents more often practice surgery in general public hospital that in faculty hospital. For 31% of all the referees, heads of departments do not incite their teams to have residents operate. Nearly 25% of all the investigated believe that a man operates more than a woman in resident curriculum. Besides, by analyzing the answers of groups 1 and 2, we were able to correlate resident seniority at their first practice of 13 surgical operations. For 26% of the group A, residents operate less than they do during their own studies. Finally, all the investigated confirm the lack of surgical assessment in the resident curriculum.


CONCLUSIONS
Decision to let the resident operate remains too dependent on senior personal appreciation and does not seem to join a strategy of training. Opinions of surgical training in the operating room is different between residents and seniors. Operating time increases when residents operate but there is no effect on quality of care. These results show again the necessity of a formal teaching and assessment, in a resident program with objectives, collecting every resident's surgery volume. These educational improvements will contribute certainly to the professionalization of residents.
Rathat
G
G
Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, CHU ADV, hôpitaux de Montpellier-Nîmes, 371, avenue du Doyen-Gaston-Giraud, 34295 Montpellier, France. Electronic address: gauthier12@gmail.com.
Hoa
D
D
Campus Medica, 8, rue du Cannau, 34000 Montpellier, France.
Gagnayre
R
R
Laboratoire de pédagogie de la santé, UPRES EA 3412 UFR SMBH-Bobigny, université Paris-13, 1, rue Chablis, 93017 Bobigny, France.
Hoffet
M
M
Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalo-universitaire CHU Carémeau, place du Pr-Robert-Debré, 30029 Nîmes, France.
Mares
P
P
Service de gynécologie-obstétrique, centre hospitalo-universitaire CHU Carémeau, place du Pr-Robert-Debré, 30029 Nîmes, France.
D000328:Adult; D003479:Curriculum; D003625:Data Collection; D005180:Faculty, Medical; D005260:Female; D013509:Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / Q000193:education* / Q000379:methods; D006784:Hospitals, Teaching; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet; D007396:Internship and Residency; D008297:Male; D009873:Operating Rooms; D013337:Students, Medical; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires