title: Afferent isn't efferent, and language isn't logic, either.
abstract: Hurford's argument suffers from two major weaknesses. First, his account of neural mechanisms suggests no place in the brain where the two halves of a predicate-argument structure could come together. Second, his assumption that language and cognition must be based on logic is neither necessary nor particularly plausible, and leads him to some unlikely conclusions.
authors.affiliation: Department of Linguistics, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI 96822 bickertond@prodigy.net.
authors.forename: Derek
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Bickerton