title: Knowledge-based choice.
abstract: This study tested the distinction between knowledge-based choices and gambling decisions. Gambling decisions contain stated probabilities, and success depends on chance only. In knowledge-based decisions, in contrast, the probabilities are usually unknown and the outcomes of a choice depend on a person's ability or knowledge. Three different theoretical accounts were used to predict knowledge-based choices: prospect theory, the competence hypothesis, and probability-focused reasoning. Students (64 women, 93 men, M=22.4 yr.) chose between a knowledge bet and a sure gain of equal expected value. Analysis showed people prefer a knowledge bet over the sure gain, if the probability of winning is high-in contrast to prospect theory, which predicts the opposite. Both the competence hypothesis and probability focused reasoning can explain these differences, but prospect theory does not. It appears knowledge-based choices and gambling decisions capture different facets of decision-making.
authors.affiliation: Johannes Kepler University of Linz, Department of Psychology, Austria. eduard.brandstaetter@jku.at
authors.forename: Eduard
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Brandstätter
authors.forename: Manuela
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Gussmack
mesh_terms: D000124:Achievement; D000328:Adult; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003071:Cognition; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male