Women's neuroethics? Why sex matters for neuroethics.
The Neuroethics Affinity Group of the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities (ASBH) met for the third time in October 2007 to review progress in the field of neuroethics and consider high-impact priorities for the future. Closely aligned with ASBH's own goals of recruiting junior scholars to bioethics and mentoring them to successful careers, the Neuroethics Affinity Group placed a call for new ideas to be presented at the Group meeting, specifically by junior attendees. One group responded with the idea to probe a new direction for neuroethics focused on the neuroscience of gender differences. In the spirit of full disclosure, two of the authors are a student (Chalfin) and fellow (Murphy) of the program I formerly directed at Stanford University. The third (Karkazis) is junior faculty there. The intellectual ownership of the ideas in the report below, however, are entirely theirs. Like lit torches in a juggling act, there are many directions this project can go. The report is a snapshot of these authors' first iteration of the concept of women's neuroethics. Many thanks are extended to participants of the ASBH Neuroethics Affinity Group meeting whose enthusiasm and feedback was immensely helpful in shaping the concept and moving it ahead.
Chalfin
Molly C
MC
Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford University, USA.
Murphy
Emily R
ER
Karkazis
Katrina A
KA
D026688:Bioethical Issues; D019336:Cognitive Science / Q000941:ethics*; D003226:Congresses as Topic; D006801:Humans; D009488:Neurosciences / Q000941:ethics*; D012727:Sex Characteristics; D012952:Societies; D014481:United States