Pathological or physiological erosion--is there a relationship to age?
This conventional literature review discusses whether pathological tooth wear is age dependant. It briefly reviews the components of tooth wear and the prevalence of tooth wear in children, adolescents and adults. The emphasis on terminology relating to tooth wear varies. In some countries, the role of erosion is considered the most important, whereas others consider the process to be a combination of erosion, attrition and abrasion often with one being more dominant. The importance of tooth wear or erosion indices in the assessment and the evidence for progression within subject and within lesions is described. The data from the few studies reporting pathological levels of wear reported in children and adults are discussed, in particular its relationship with age. There is little evidence to support the concept that pathological levels of erosion or wear are age dependant. There is, however, some evidence to suggest that normal levels of erosion or wear are age dependant.
Bartlett
David
D
Department of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics, King's College London Dental Institute, Floor 25, Guy's Tower, London Bridge, SE19RT, London, UK. david.bartlett@kcl.ac.uk
Dugmore
Chris
C
D017677:Age Distribution; D000375:Aging / Q000473:pathology / Q000502:physiology*; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D006801:Humans; D009811:Odontometry; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D014072:Tooth Abrasion / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology; D019217:Tooth Attrition / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology; D014077:Tooth Erosion / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology