A comparison of radiation exposure with the conventional versus mini C arm in orthopedic extremity surgery.
BACKGROUND
The mini C arm is a mobile fluoroscopic device for use on extremities. It has been reported that this type of device has several advantages over a conventional C arm, the most important of which is a decreased level of radiation scatter to the surgeon.


METHODS
This was a case control study. The radiation dose to the surgeon was calculated from the radiation exposure time and distance from the x-ray emitter. Cases using the mini C arm were compared with operation-matched controls that had the identical procedure performed with a conventional C arm.


RESULTS
The mini C arm caused statistically less radiation scatter to the surgeon, but there was no statistically significant difference in the radiation exposure to the patient. This was despite a significantly larger number of exposures with the mini C arm for each operation type.


CONCLUSIONS
The mini C arm should be used in preference to the conventional C arm for extremity surgery, if both are available.
Shoaib
Amer
A
Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Hospital, Oswestry, SY10 7AG United Kingdom. amershoaib@doctors.org.uk
Rethnam
Ulfin
U
Bansal
Ravi
R
De
Anirban
A
Makwana
Nilesh
N
D016022:Case-Control Studies; D005471:Fluoroscopy / Q000295:instrumentation*; D006801:Humans; D016273:Occupational Exposure; D009985:Orthopedics; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012542:Scattering, Radiation