Formal notations are diagrams: evidence from a production task.
Although a general sense of the magnitude, quantity, or numerosity of objects is common in both untrained people and animals, the abilities to deal exactly with large quantities and to reason precisely in complex but well-specified situations--to behave formally, that is--are skills unique to people trained in symbolic notations. These symbolic notations typically employ complex, hierarchically embedded structures, which all extant analyses assume are constructed by concatenative, rule-based processes. The primary goal of this article is to establish, using behavioral measures on naturalistic tasks, that some of the same cognitive resources involved in representing spatial relations and proximities are also involved in representing symbolic notations--in short, that formal notations are a kind of diagram. We examined self-generated productions in the domains of handwritten arithmetic expressions and typewritten statements in a formal logic. In both tasks, we found substantial evidence for spatial representational schemes even in these highly symbolic domains.
Landy
David
D
Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA. dlandy@indiana.edu
Goldtone
Robert L
RL
D003071:Cognition; D005364:Field Dependence-Independence; D006801:Humans; D008128:Logic; D008433:Mathematics; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011340:Problem Solving; D013028:Space Perception; D013561:Symbolism; D014956:Writing