Shared or unshared consensus decision in macaques?
Members of a social group have to make collective decisions in order to synchronise their activities. In a shared consensus decision, all group members can take part in the decision whereas in an unshared consensus decision, one individual, usually a dominant member of the group, takes the decision for the rest of the group. It has been suggested that the type of decision-making of a species could be influenced by its social style. To investigate this further, we studied collective movements in two species with opposed social systems, the Tonkean macaque (Macaca tonkeana) and the rhesus macaque (Macaca mulatta). From our results, it appears that the decision to move is the result of the choices and actions of several individuals in both groups. However, this consensus decision involved nearly all group members in Tonkean macaques whereas dominant and old individuals took a prominent role in rhesus macaques. Thus, we suggest that Tonkean macaques display equally shared consensus decisions to move, whereas in the same context rhesus macaque exhibit partially shared consensus decisions. Such a difference in making a collective decision might be linked to the different social systems of the two studied species.
Sueur
C
C
Ethologie des Primates, Département d'Ecologie, Physiologie et Ethologie, France.
Petit
O
O
D000818:Animals; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006126:Group Processes; D006608:Hierarchy, Social; D008251:Macaca / Q000523:psychology*; D008297:Male