title: Adherence to pressure ulcer prevention guidelines in home care: a survey of current practice.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To investigate the pressure ulcer prevalence in home nursing patients and to evaluate guideline adherence of measures for the prevention of pressure ulcers and the participation of informal carers in pressure ulcer prevention.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Since 2002, the Belgian Guideline for the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers was published on the Internet, but no information was available on guideline adherence in home care.
  
  
  METHODS
  A cross-sectional survey of pressure ulcer prevalence and guideline adherence was performed in a cluster randomized sample of 2779 clients of nine regional nursing departments in Flanders, Belgium. The Belgian Guideline for the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers was the reference standard for the evaluation of the guideline adherence.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There were 744 subjects at risk for developing pressure ulcers. The overall prevalence of pressure ulcers for the total sample population was 6.8%. The age-, sex- and risk-standardized prevalence per regional department varied between 4.9% and 9.1%. Of the 744 subjects at risk, 33 (4.4%) received preventive measures, which were in adherence to the Belgian Guideline for Prevention of Pressure Ulcers, 482 persons (64.8%) were administered measures, which did not adhere to the Belgian Guideline for Prevention of Pressure Ulcers and in 229 subjects (30.8%) at risk for developing pressure ulcers, prevention was lacking. For subjects with at least one pressure ulcer, the proportions were: 4.8% adherence, 76.6% no adherence and 18.6% no prevention. A proportion of 22.2% of the patients at risk and their informal carers were informed and motivated by the home care nurse to participate in the pressure ulcer prevention and their actual participation in the prevention was 21.4% of all risk cases.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The adherence of nurses and clients to the guideline for pressure ulcer prevention was low. RELEVANCE TO THE CLINICAL PRACTICE: The study demonstrates a detailed evaluation of guideline adherence to pressure ulcer prevention in an individual patient situation, with special attention for materials and measures, which are not adequate and not recommended by the Belgian Guideline for the Prevention of Pressure Ulcers.
authors.affiliation: Wit-Gele Kruis van Vlaanderen, Brussels & Department of General Practice, KU Leuven, Belgium. louis.paquay@vlaanderen.wgk.be
authors.forename: Louis
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Paquay
authors.forename: Renild
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Wouters
authors.forename: Tom
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Defloor
authors.forename: Frank
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Buntinx
authors.forename: Roseline
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Debaillie
authors.forename: Ludo
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Geys
mesh_terms: D000203:Activities of Daily Living; D001530:Belgium / Q000453:epidemiology; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003625:Data Collection; D006699:Home Care Services; D006801:Humans; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D003668:Pressure Ulcer / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D015995:Prevalence; D012307:Risk Factors