title: [Multi-detector CT screening for lung cancer is still to be discouraged for the time being].
abstract: Lung cancer is an important public health problem with almost no improvement in survival over the past decades. Although observational studies demonstrate that low-dose multi-detector spiral-CT screening is able to detect lung cancer in an early stage in 55-85% of all cancer cases detected, and that 5- and even 10-year survival rates close to 90% can be achieved, these studies do not answer the question whether CT screening is advisable. Excellent survival rates in a few individuals do not necessarily indicate that there is a lung cancer-specific reduction in mortality, since observational studies are subject to several biases: lead time bias, over-diagnosis bias, and length time bias. Therefore, there is a strong worldwide recommendation from various professional organisations not to adopt CT screening for lung cancer on a wide scale, but to await the results from large randomised studies such as the US 'National lung screening trial' and the Dutch-Belgian-Danish 'Netherlands-Louvain lung cancer screening study' (NELSON), which will provide more clarity as to the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness and possible negative effects of CT screening for lung cancer.
authors.affiliation: Erasmus MC-Centrum, Rotterdam. r.j.vanklaveren@erasmusmc.nl
authors.forename: R J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: van Klaveren
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Oudkerk
authors.forename: W P Th M
authors.initials: WP
authors.lastname: Mali
authors.forename: H J
authors.initials: HJ
authors.lastname: de Koning
mesh_terms: D015982:Bias; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D006801:Humans; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000401:mortality; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods; D012307:Risk Factors; D015996:Survival Rate; D036542:Tomography, Spiral Computed / Q000191:economics* / Q000379:methods*