The failure rate of NHS funded molar endodontic treatment delivered in general dental practice.
OBJECTIVE
To describe the quality and record the outcomes of root canal therapy on mandibular, first permanent molar teeth provided by GDPs working according to NHS contracts.


METHODS
Descriptive, retrospective cohort study.


METHODS
Twelve general dental practices in Salford, North West England.


METHODS
All patients aged 20-60 years attending the practices who had received a NHS-funded root filling in a mandibular first permanent molar between January 1998 and December 2003. The radiographic quality of root fillings in the teeth was assessed by an endodontic specialist and categorised into optimal, suboptimal and teeth which had no radiograph, or an unreadable radiograph. Teeth were also dichotomised into those restored with a crown and those restored with an intracoronal restoration. Failure as an outcome was defined as if a tooth was extracted, the root filling was replaced or periradicular surgery was performed on the tooth. Crude failure rates per 100 years were calculated for optimally, sub-optimally root filled teeth and for those with no or an unreadable radiograph, and according to how the tooth was coronally restored. Survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards were used to determine factors linked with increased failures.


RESULTS
One hundred and seventy-four teeth were included in the study, of which 16 failed. The crude failure rates per 100 years with a root filled tooth were very low and differed little (p = 0.9699) for optimally (2.6), sub-optimally (2.5) root filled teeth and for those with no or an unreadable radiograph (2.9), with approximately one in 37 root filled mandibular first molar teeth failing each year. The majority of root fillings fail within the first two years (N = 10, 62.5%). Some 67 teeth (38.5%) were restored with a crown, none of which failed during the follow up period compared to those with a plastic restoration (p = 0.0004).


CONCLUSIONS
The very low failure rates have significant implications for the design of research studies investigating outcomes of endodontic therapy. The similar failure rates for teeth that had optimal and suboptimal root fillings suggest that endodontic treatment is not as technique sensitive as previously thought. The results also support the notion that the coronal restoration is more important than radiographic appearance of the root filling.
Tickle
M
M
Oral Health Unit, National Primary Care R&D Centre, School of Dentistry, University of Manchester. martin.tickle@manchester.ac.uk
Milsom
K
K
Qualtrough
A
A
Blinkhorn
F
F
Aggarwal
V R
VR
D000328:Adult; D015331:Cohort Studies; D003442:Crowns; D019232:Dental Restoration Failure; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent; D004739:England; D005792:General Practice, Dental; D006801:Humans; D053208:Kaplan-Meier Estimate; D008334:Mandible; D008875:Middle Aged; D008963:Molar / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology; D016016:Proportional Hazards Models; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D011859:Radiography; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012390:Root Canal Therapy / Q000009:adverse effects*; D013218:State Dentistry / Q000191:economics*