title: Use of cytology as a diagnostic method in veterinary practice and assessment of communication between veterinary practitioners and veterinary clinical pathologists.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine the extent of use of cytology as a diagnostic method in veterinary practice and assess how veterinarians in practice communicate with veterinary clinical pathologists.
  
  
  METHODS
  Online survey.
  
  
  METHODS
  870 veterinarians.
  
  
  METHODS
  An online survey was made available to members of the Veterinary Information Network from October 1, 2004, through December 1, 2004.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Respondents reported obtaining a median of 7 cytology samples weekly (range, 0 to 100). On average, respondents reported that 48.1% of the samples they collected were evaluated in-house, 29.5% were submitted to a veterinary diagnostic laboratory, and 21.6% were evaluated in-house and then submitted to a diagnostic laboratory. Most respondents (89.2%) reported using cytologic assessments to guide additional testing, and most (80.3%) indicated that they found the comments section of the cytology report to be the most important section. When asked to indicate the importance of various factors in their decision to use cytology as a diagnostic method, respondents overwhelmingly indicated that accuracy was very important. The most common reasons for consulting with a clinical pathologist were to discuss a discrepancy between clinical and cytologic findings, to clarify a diagnosis, and to ascertain the pathologist's confidence in a diagnosis. Respondents expressed more confidence in results when board-certified clinical pathologists were examining cytology samples than when others were.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Results suggested that improving communication between veterinary practitioners and veterinary clinical pathologists could enhance the diagnostic value of cytologic examinations and improve clinical decision-making.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pathology, Microbiology, and Immunology, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
authors.forename: Mary M
authors.initials: MM
authors.lastname: Christopher
authors.forename: Christine S
authors.initials: CS
authors.lastname: Hotz
authors.forename: Sonjia M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Shelly
authors.forename: Paul D
authors.initials: PD
authors.lastname: Pion
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000818:Animals; D002983:Clinical Competence; D003142:Communication; D003584:Cytological Techniques / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards / Q000662:veterinary*; D003625:Data Collection; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010338:Pathology, Clinical / Q000592:standards*; D010341:Pathology, Veterinary / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D018634:Veterinarians / Q000523:psychology*; D014730:Veterinary Medicine / Q000592:standards*