The need for immediate computed tomography scan after emergency craniotomy for head injury.
BACKGROUND
Patients who undergo emergency craniotomy for head injury require vigilant postoperative (postop) care to obtain the best possible outcome. Although repeat head computed tomography (CT) scans are a key component of the management of these patients, there is no consensus on the optimal timing of the initial postop CT.


METHODS
We conducted a retrospective registry-based review of the care of 199 consecutive trauma patients who underwent craniotomy for head injury at a Level I trauma center to evaluate the role of postop CT in their management.


RESULTS
One hundred and ninety-nine patients underwent 218 craniotomies for head injury during the 78-month study period. Mean age was 48 years and 73.9% were men. Overall survival was 71.4%. The primary indication for operation included subdural hematoma (SDH) in 136 (62.4%), epidural hematoma (EDH) in 32 (14.7%), intraparenchymal hemorrhage or contusion in 21 (9.6%), depressed skull fracture in 17 (7.8%), and other indications in 12 (5.5%). Postop CTs were obtained after 197 (90.4%) of the operations at a mean of 19.2 hours and revealed a variety of unexpected findings with clinical implications. The only variable statistically associated with unexpected findings was SDH as an indication for operation (p < 0.01). Fourteen (7.0%) patients required a second craniotomy in the 2 days after their initial operation. In six (3.0%) patients, postop CTs were obtained between 4.2 hours and 21.1 hours after initial craniotomy and an earlier postop CT would most likely have prevented a significant delay in operation. Findings in these six patients included recurrent SDH or EDH in two, new SDH or EDH in two, and intraparenchymal hemorrhage in two. Neither neurologic examination nor postop intracranial pressure monitoring reliably predicted the presence of new or recurrent hemorrhage or other significant findings.


CONCLUSIONS
Early, if not immediate, postop CT after emergency craniotomy for head trauma appears to be warranted. We found a significant incidence of unexpected findings on postop CT and encountered avoidable delays in treatment of new or recurrent findings.
Paci
Gabrielle M
GM
Division of Trauma, Scripps Mercy Hospital, San Diego, California, USA.
Sise
Michael J
MJ
Sise
C Beth
CB
Sack
Daniel I
DI
Swanson
Sophia M
SM
Holbrook
Troy L
TL
Hunstock
Amy M
AM
Altenau
Lance L
LL
Carver
Thomas W
TW
D015998:Abbreviated Injury Scale; D006259:Craniocerebral Trauma / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000601:surgery; D003399:Craniotomy; D004638:Emergency Treatment; D005260:Female; D006406:Hematoma / Q000601:surgery; D006801:Humans; D020300:Intracranial Hemorrhages / Q000601:surgery; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011182:Postoperative Care; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed