title: Race, religion, and informed consent--lessons from social science.
abstract: That minority patients have not figured at all in the literature about informed consent is an egregious omission which this article begins to repair. Moreover, the article demonstrates that by addressing identifiable harms which informed consent law now causes to racial, religious, and ethnic minority patients, the law may also better address many of the concerns legal commentators have been discussing for years with only majority patients in mind. Ironically, the solution to the discrimination felt by the excluded members of society may turn out to provide the remedy for the informed consent doctrine as a whole.
authors.affiliation: University of Colorado Law School, USA.
authors.forename: Dayna Bowen
authors.initials: DB
authors.lastname: Matthew
mesh_terms: D002961:Civil Rights / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D008318:Malpractice / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D008913:Minority Groups / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations / Q000941:ethics; D012068:Religion and Medicine; D012942:Social Sciences; D014481:United States