title: Differential response effects of data collection mode in a cancer screening study of unmarried women ages 40-75 years: a randomized trial.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Little is known about the impact of data collection method on self-reported cancer screening behaviours, particularly among hard-to-reach populations. The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of data collection mode on response to indicators of cancer screenings by unmarried middle-aged and older women.
  
  
  METHODS
  Three survey methods were evaluated for collecting data about mammography and Papanicolaou (hereafter, Pap) testing among heterosexual and sexual minority (e.g., lesbian and bisexual) women. Women ages 40-75 were recruited from June 2003 - June 2005 in Rhode Island. They were randomly assigned to receive: Self-Administered Mailed Questionnaire [SAMQ; N = 202], Computer-Assisted Telephone Interview [CATI; N = 200], or Computer-Assisted Self-Interview [CASI; N = 197]. Logistic regression models were computed to assess survey mode differences for 13 self-reported items related to cancer screenings, adjusting for age, education, income, race, marital status, partner gender, and recruitment source.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Compared to women assigned to CATI, women assigned to SAMQ were less likely to report two or more years between most recent mammograms (CATI = 23.2% vs. SAMQ = 17.7%; AOR = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.3 - 0.8) and women assigned to CASI were slightly less likely to report being overdue for mammography (CATI = 16.5% vs. CASI = 11.8%; AOR = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.3 - 1.0) and Pap testing (CATI = 14.9% vs. CASI = 10.0%; AOR = 0.5, 95% CI = 0.2 - 1.0). There were no other consistent mode effects.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Among participants in this sample, mode of data collection had little effect on the reporting of mammography and Pap testing behaviours. Other measures such as efficiency and cost-effectiveness of the mode should also be considered when determining the most appropriate form of data collection for use in monitoring indicators of cancer detection and control.
authors.affiliation: Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Program in Public Health, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island, USA. Melissa_Clark@brown.edu
authors.forename: Melissa A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Clark
authors.forename: Michelle L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Rogers
authors.forename: Gene F
authors.initials: GF
authors.lastname: Armstrong
authors.forename: William
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Rakowski
authors.forename: Frederick J
authors.initials: FJ
authors.lastname: Kviz
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003201:Computers; D003625:Data Collection / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D018452:Homosexuality, Female; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic / Q000379:methods; D016015:Logistic Models; D008327:Mammography / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D008875:Middle Aged; D065006:Papanicolaou Test; D012237:Rhode Island; D012847:Single Person; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014626:Vaginal Smears / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*