title: Translating best practices in assessing capillary refill.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  A research roundtable was held in an urban community hospital in the United States to determine the strength, usefulness, and feasibility of empirical and clinical evidence evaluated in a systematic review assessing capillary refill.
  
  
  METHODS
  The roundtable was undertaken to provide an additional dimension for the development of a best-practice guideline. Current practices and policies in this acute care hospital were examined concerning the strength of the evidence.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Isolated performance of capillary refill assessment is of limited value and no nursing interventions rely solely on this measure. Future research should be directed toward evaluation and comparative analyses of alternate methods of evaluating peripheral perfusion.
authors.affiliation: College of Nursing, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island 02881, USA. Marlened@uri.edu
authors.forename: Marlene
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Dufault
authors.forename: Barbara
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Davis
authors.forename: Dorothy
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Garman
authors.forename: Rose
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Hehl
authors.forename: Jeanne
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Henry
authors.forename: Mary
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Lavin
authors.forename: Joann
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Barnes-Mullaney
authors.forename: Patricia
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Stout
mesh_terms: D019985:Benchmarking; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D006764:Hospitals, Community; D006801:Humans; D016294:Models, Nursing; D009730:Nursing Assessment / Q000379:methods*; D009732:Nursing Care / Q000592:standards*