Forward-masked spatial tuning curves in cochlear implant users.
Forward-masked psychophysical spatial tuning curves (fmSTCs) were measured in twelve cochlear-implant subjects, six using bipolar stimulation (Nucleus devices) and six using monopolar stimulation (Clarion devices). fmSTCs were measured at several probe levels on a middle electrode using a fixed-level probe stimulus and variable-level maskers. The average fmSTC slopes obtained in subjects using bipolar stimulation (3.7 dBmm) were approximately three times steeper than average slopes obtained in subjects using monopolar stimulation (1.2 dBmm). Average spatial bandwidths were about half as wide for subjects with bipolar stimulation (2.6 mm) than for subjects with monopolar stimulation (4.6 mm). None of the tuning curve characteristics changed significantly with probe level. fmSTCs replotted in terms of acoustic frequency, using Greenwood's [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 33, 1344-1356 (1961)] frequency-to-place equation, were compared with forward-masked psychophysical tuning curves obtained previously from normal-hearing and hearing-impaired acoustic listeners. The average tuning characteristics of fmSTCs in electric hearing were similar to the broad tuning observed in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired acoustic listeners at high stimulus levels. This suggests that spatial tuning is not the primary factor limiting speech perception in many cochlear implant users.
Nelson
David A
DA
Clinical Psychoacoustics Laboratory, Department of Otolaryngology, University of Minnesota, MMC396, 420 Delaware Street S.E., Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. dan@umn.edu
Donaldson
Gail S
GS
Kreft
Heather
H
D000222:Adaptation, Physiological; D001299:Audiometry / Q000295:instrumentation; D003054:Cochlear Implants; D004566:Electrodes; D006309:Hearing / Q000502:physiology; D006311:Hearing Disorders; D006801:Humans; D010470:Perceptual Masking / Q000502:physiology*; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D013997:Time Factors