title: The effects of interocular correlation and contrast on stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Decreasing the interocular correlation in random dot stereograms elevates disparity detection thresholds. Whether decorrelation also affects perceived depth from suprathreshold disparity magnitudes is unknown. The present study investigated the effects of interocular correlation and contrast on the magnitude of perceived depth in suprathreshold random dot stereograms.
  
  
  METHODS
  Stereoscopic depth magnitude estimation as a function of percent interocular correlation of dynamic random dot stimuli was measured for five human subjects with clinically normal binocular vision. Each trial's stimulus was randomly assigned one of two magnitudes of either crossed or uncrossed relative disparity. Subjects verbally reported the direction and magnitude of perceived relative depth for each trial using a modulus-free scale. Normalized depth magnitude estimations as a function of the percent interocular correlation demonstrated the relationship between perceived depth, interocular correlation and contrast within subjects. Inter-subject variability was examined with comparisons of data across subjects.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The depth magnitude perceived for a given magnitude of disparity declined as the percent of correlation of elements between the eyes decreased for both crossed and uncrossed directions. The effect generally was greater for uncrossed disparities and lower contrast. Some subjects demonstrated asymmetries in perceived depth for crossed vs. uncrossed disparities of the same magnitude.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Magnitude estimation of suprathreshold stimuli provided a method of studying performance characteristics of stereoscopic depth perception across the range of functional disparities. Differences found in depth magnitude estimation as a function of the sign of disparity suggest that the neural mechanisms underlying depth perception from uncrossed disparity are more sensitive to image decorrelation, particularly at low contrast, than the mechanisms underlying depth estimation from crossed disparity. These results could occur from differences in near and far disparity-sensitive neurons, from the geometrical relationship between disparity and physical distance in normal viewing, or from the response measure independent of perception.
authors.affiliation: Nova Southeastern University College of Optometry, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA. cisarik@nsu.nova.edu
authors.forename: Patricia M
authors.initials: PM
authors.lastname: Cisarik
authors.forename: Ronald S
authors.initials: RS
authors.lastname: Harwerth
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D015350:Contrast Sensitivity / Q000502:physiology*; D003867:Depth Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D015357:Vision Disparity / Q000502:physiology*; D015348:Vision, Binocular / Q000502:physiology