A visual ergonomic evaluation of different screen types and screen technologies with respect to discrimination performance.
An increasing demand to work with electronic displays and to use mobile computers emphasises the need to compare visual performance while working with different screen types. In the present study, a cathode ray tube (CRT) was compared to an external liquid crystal display (LCD) and a Notebook-LCD. The influence of screen type and viewing angle on discrimination performance was studied. Physical measurements revealed that luminance and contrast values change with varying viewing angles (anisotropy). This is most pronounced in Notebook-LCDs, followed by external LCDs and CRTs. Performance data showed that LCD's anisotropy has negative impacts on completing time critical visual tasks. The best results were achieved when a CRT was used. The largest deterioration of performance resulted when participants worked with a Notebook-LCD. When it is necessary to react quickly and accurately, LCD screens have disadvantages. The anisotropy of LCD-TFTs is therefore considered to be as a limiting factor deteriorating visual performance.
Oetjen
Sophie
S
RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. Sophie.Oetjen@psych.rwth-aachen.de
Ziefle
Martina
M
D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D016880:Anisotropy; D016288:Computer Terminals; D006804:Ergonomics; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D050866:Liquid Crystals; D008297:Male; D010783:Photometry; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011930:Reaction Time; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D014584:User-Computer Interface; D014785:Vision, Ocular / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception