title: Tumor blood flow measured by PET dynamic imaging of first-pass 18F-FDG uptake: a comparison with 15O-labeled water-measured blood flow.
abstract: PET molecular imaging of 15O-labeled water is the gold standard for measuring blood flow in humans. However, this requires an on-site cyclotron to produce the short-lived 15O tracer, which is cost-prohibitive for most clinical PET centers. The purpose of this study was to determine if the early uptake of 18F-FDG could be used to measure regional blood flow in tumors in the absence of 15O-water.
  
  
  METHODS
  PET scans were obtained in patients being evaluated for tumor perfusion and glucose metabolism in a phase I dose-escalating protocol for endostatin, a novel antiangiogenic agent. A 2-min perfusion scan was performed with a bolus injection of 2,220 MBq (60 mCi) of 15O-water, which was followed by a 370-MBq (10 mCi) dose of 18F-FDG. Four sequential scans of 18F-FDG uptake were acquired, consisting of an early 2-min uptake scan-or first-pass scan-and 3 sequential 15-min late 18F-FDG uptake scans. Regions of interest (ROIs) were drawn on 2 or more tumor sites and on back muscle, as a control ROI, for each patient. Arterial blood concentration was derived from the PET scans by drawing an ROI over a large artery in the field of view. Blood flow was computed with a simple 1-compartment blood flow model using the first 2 min of data after injection.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Blood flow estimated from the early uptake of 18F-FDG was linearly correlated with 15O-measured blood flow, with an intercept of 0.01, a slope of 0.86, and an R2 regression coefficient of 0.74 (r = 0.86). The 18F-FDG tumor extraction fraction relative to 15O-water averaged 0.86. A preliminary case study of a patient with prostate cancer confirms the utility of the first-pass 18F-FDG blood flow analysis in tumor diagnosis.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  These results suggest that the first-pass uptake of 18F-FDG may provide an estimate of perfusion in a tumor within the limitations of incomplete extraction of 18F-FDG compared with 15O-water.
authors.affiliation: University of Texas Medical School-Houston, Houston, TX, USA. mullani@tlite.com
authors.forename: Nizar A
authors.initials: NA
authors.lastname: Mullani
authors.forename: Roy S
authors.initials: RS
authors.lastname: Herbst
authors.forename: Roger G
authors.initials: RG
authors.lastname: O'Neil
authors.forename: K Lance
authors.initials: KL
authors.lastname: Gould
authors.forename: Bruce J
authors.initials: BJ
authors.lastname: Barron
authors.forename: James L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Abbruzzese
mesh_terms: D019788:Fluorodeoxyglucose F18; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010104:Oxygen Radioisotopes; D049268:Positron-Emission Tomography / Q000379:methods*; D011471:Prostatic Neoplasms / Q000098:blood supply*; D012039:Regional Blood Flow
chemical_list: D010104:Oxygen Radioisotopes; D019788:Fluorodeoxyglucose F18