Blood and expertise: the trials of the female medical expert in the ancien-régime courtroom.
This article explores the obstacles faced by the female medical expert in the early modern courtroom through a close reading of three case studies: Marie Garnier, expert midwife tried for false testimony in 1665, and Angélique Perrotin and Barbe-Françoise D'Igard, accused of false accusation of rape and infant substitution, respectively, in the 1730s. The difficulties of determining the veracity of the corporeal signs of a crime were particularly acute with regard to the reproductive female body, which was perceived to be less reliable than its male counterpart. The ability of the female medical expert to accurately and truthfully interpret such signs was also questionable, and at times she seems to have been as much "on trial" as the bodies of those she examined.
McClive
Cathy
C
Department of History, University of Durham, 43 North Bailey, Durham, UK. cathy.mcclive@durham.ac.uk
D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D005104:Expert Testimony; D005260:Female; D044707:Forensic Sciences / Q000266:history; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D049670:History, 17th Century; D049671:History, 18th Century; D006801:Humans; D008880:Midwifery / Q000266:history