Collateral benefits and hidden hazards of soil arsenic during abatement assessment of residential lead hazards.
Abatement of soil-lead hazards may also reduce human exposure to other soil toxins, thereby achieving significant collateral benefits that are not accounted for today. This proposition was tested with the specific case of soil-arsenic, where 1726 residential soil samples were collected and analyzed for lead and arsenic. The study found that these two toxins coexisted in most samples, but their concentrations were weakly correlated, reflecting the differing sources for each toxin. Collateral benefits of 9% would be achieved during abatement of the lead-contaminated soils having elevated arsenic concentrations. However, a hidden hazard of 16% was observed by overlooking elevated arsenic concentrations in soils having lead concentrations not requiring abatement. This study recommends that soil samples collected under HUD programs should be collected from areas of lead and arsenic deposition and tested for arsenic as well as lead, and that soil abatement decisions consider soil-arsenic as well as soil-lead guidelines.
Elless
M P
MP
Edenspace Systems Corporation, 3810 Concorde Parkway, Suite 100, Dulles, VA 20151-1131, USA. elless@edenspace.com
Ferguson
B W
BW
Bray
C A
CA
Patch
S
S
Mielke
H
H
Blaylock
M J
MJ
D001151:Arsenic / Q000032:analysis*; D004781:Environmental Exposure / Q000032:analysis / Q000517:prevention & control; D004784:Environmental Monitoring / Q000379:methods; D006798:Housing; D006801:Humans; D007854:Lead / Q000032:analysis*; D012989:Soil Pollutants / Q000032:analysis*; D014504:Urban Health / Q000706:statistics & numerical data
D012989:Soil Pollutants; D007854:Lead; D001151:Arsenic