Comparative evaluation of the liver in dogs with a splenic mass by using ultrasonography and contrast-enhanced computed tomography.
Evaluation of dogs with splenic masses to better educate owners as to the extent of the disease is a goal of many research studies. We compared the use of ultrasonography (US) and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) to evaluate the accuracy of detecting hepatic neoplasia in dogs with splenic masses, independently, in series, or in parallel. No significant difference was found between US and CT. If the presence or absence of ascites, as detected with US, was used as a pretest probability of disease in our population, the positive predictive value increased to 94% if the tests were run in series, and the negative predictive value increased to 95% if the tests were run in parallel. The study showed that CT combined with US could be a valuable tool in evaluation of dogs with splenic masses.
Irausquin
Roelof A
RA
Garden State Veterinary Specialists, One Pine Street, Tinton Falls, New Jersey 07753, USA. rudvet@aol.com
Scavelli
Thomas D
TD
Corti
Lisa
L
Stefanacci
Joseph D
JD
DeMarco
Joann
J
Flood
Shannon
S
Rohrbach
Barton W
BW
D000818:Animals; D003287:Contrast Media / Q000008:administration & dosage; D004283:Dog Diseases / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D004285:Dogs; D005260:Female; D008113:Liver Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000556:secondary / Q000662:veterinary*; D008297:Male; D009362:Neoplasm Metastasis; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011379:Prognosis; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D013160:Splenic Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology / Q000662:veterinary*; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*; D014463:Ultrasonography / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*
D003287:Contrast Media