The incidence and risk of central venous catheter malpositioning: a prospective cohort study in 1619 patients.
Central venous catheters are used in various hospital wards. An anterior-posterior chest X-ray is usually obtained soon after cannulation to assess the location of the catheter tip. This prospective clinical study was designed to determine the radiographic catheter tip position after central venous cannulation by various routes, to identify clinical problems possibly associated with the use of malpositioned catheters and to make a cost-benefit analysis of routine chest X-ray with respect to catheter malposition. A total 1619 central venous cannulations were recorded during a three-year period with respect to patient data, information about the cannulation procedures, the radiographic catheter positions and complications during clinical use. The total incidence of radiographic catheter tip malposition, defined as extrathoracic or ventricular positioning, was 3.3% (confidence interval 25 to 4.3%). Cannulation by the right subclavian vein was associated with the highest risk of malposition, 9.1%, compared with 1.4% by the right internal jugular vein. Six of the 53 malpositioned catheters were removed or adjusted. No case of malposition was associated with vascular perforation, local venous thrombosis or cerebral symptoms. We conclude that the radiographic incidence of central venous catheter malpositioning is low and that clinical use of malpositioned catheters is associated with few complications. However, determination of the catheter position by chest X-ray should be considered when mechanical complications cannot be excluded, aspiration of venous blood is not possible, or the catheter is intended for central venous pressure monitoring, high flow use or infusion of local irritant drugs.
Pikwer
A
A
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Lund University, Malmö University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Bååth
L
L
Davidson
B
B
Perstoft
I
I
Akeson
J
J
D002405:Catheterization, Central Venous / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000295:instrumentation; D015331:Cohort Studies; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D004868:Equipment Failure / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D005260:Female; D006325:Heart Atria / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000293:injuries; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D007601:Jugular Veins / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000293:injuries; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000191:economics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D013902:Radiography, Thoracic / Q000191:economics*; D012307:Risk Factors; D013350:Subclavian Vein / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000293:injuries; D013548:Sweden / Q000453:epidemiology