History and evolution of control banding: a review.
Control banding (CB) strategies offer simplified solutions for controlling worker exposures to constituents often encountered in the workplace. The original CB model was developed within the pharmaceutical industry; however, the modern movement involves models developed for non-experts to input hazard and exposure potential information for bulk chemical processes, receiving control advice as a result. The CB approach utilizes these models for the dissemination of qualitative and semiquantitative risk assessment tools being developed to complement the traditional industrial hygiene model of air sampling and analysis. It is being applied and tested in small- and medium-sized enterprises within developed countries and industrially developing countries; however, large enterprises have also incorporated these strategies within chemical safety programs. Existing research of the components of the most available CB model, the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Essentials, has shown that exposure bands do not always provide adequate margins of safety, that there is a high rate of under-control errors, that it works better with dusts than with vapors, that there is an inherent inaccuracy in estimating variability, and that when taken together the outcomes of this model may lead to potentially inappropriate workplace confidence in chemical exposure reduction in some operations. Alternatively, large-scale comparisons of industry exposure data to this CB model's outcomes have indicated more promising results with a high correlation seen internationally. With the accuracy of the toxicological ratings and hazard band classification currently in question, their proper re-evaluation will be of great benefit to the reliability of existing and future CB models. The need for a more complete analysis of CB model components and, most importantly, a more comprehensive prospective research process remains. This analysis will be important in understanding implications of the model's overall effectiveness. Since the CB approach is now being used worldwide with an even broader implementation in progress, further research toward understanding its strengths and weaknesses will assist in its further refinement and confidence in its ongoing utility.
Zalk
David M
DM
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94551, USA. zalk1@llnl.gov
Nelson
Deborah Imel
DI
D000395:Air Pollutants, Occupational / Q000032:analysis*; D002617:Chemical Industry / Q000592:standards; D015386:Hazardous Substances / Q000032:analysis; D049673:History, 20th Century; D049674:History, 21st Century; D006801:Humans; D008954:Models, Biological; D009784:Occupational Diseases / Q000517:prevention & control; D016273:Occupational Exposure / Q000266:history / Q000517:prevention & control; D016272:Occupational Health / Q000266:history / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D018570:Risk Assessment / Q000379:methods; D017751:Safety Management / Q000266:history / Q000379:methods
D000395:Air Pollutants, Occupational; D015386:Hazardous Substances