Spatiotemporal context influences perception of an ambiguous target in visual search.
The two-stage model of amodal completion or TSM (Sekuler & Palmer, 1992), and the ambiguity theory (Rauschenberger, Peterson, Mosca, & Bruno, 2004) provide conflicting accounts of the phenomenon of amodal completion in 2-D images. TSM claims that an initial mosaic (2-D) representation gives way to a later amodally completed (3-D) representation. Furthermore, the 2-D representation is accessible only prior to formation of the 3-D representation. On the other hand, the ambiguity theory claims that the 2-D and 3-D representations develop in parallel and that preference for one of the coexisting representations over the other may be subject to the influence of spatiotemporal context provided by other elements in the visual display. Our experiments support the claim that, once formed, both representations coexist, with spatiotemporal context potentially determining which representation is perceived.
Scheessele
Michael R
MR
Department of Computer and Information Sciences, Indiana University, South Bend, Indiana 46634, USA. mscheess@iusb.edu
Chaaban
Ibrahim
I
D001288:Attention; D003867:Depth Perception; D005795:Generalization, Stimulus; D006801:Humans; D009903:Optical Illusions; D009949:Orientation; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D010466:Perceptual Closure; D011601:Psychophysics