title: Do abnormal responses show utilitarian bias?
abstract: Neuroscience has recently turned to the study of utilitarian and non-utilitarian moral judgement. Koenigs et al. examine the responses of normal subjects and those with ventromedial-prefrontal-cortex (VMPC) damage to moral scenarios drawn from functional magnetic resonance imaging studies by Greene et al., and claim that patients with VMPC damage have an abnormally "utilitarian" pattern of moral judgement. It is crucial to the claims of Koenigs et al. that the scenarios of Greene et al. pose a conflict between utilitarian consequence and duty: however, many of them do not meet this condition. Because of this methodological problem, it is too early to claim that VMPC patients have a utilitarian bias.
authors: Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 1PT, UK.
authors: Guy
authors: G
authors: Kahane
authors: Nicholas
authors: N
authors: Shackel
mesh_terms: D001930:Brain Injuries / Q000503:physiopathology*; D002755:Choice Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D004644:Emotions / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment / Q000502:physiology*; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D009014:Morals; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012919:Social Behavior