Bond dissociation energies in second-row compounds.
Heats of formation at 0 and 298 K are predicted for PF3, PF5, PF3O, SF2, SF4, SF6, SF2O, SF2O2, and SF4O as well as a number of radicals derived from these stable compounds on the basis of coupled cluster theory [CCSD(T)] calculations extrapolated to the complete basis set limit. In order to achieve near chemical accuracy (+/-1 kcal/mol), additional corrections were added to the complete basis set binding energies based on frozen core coupled cluster theory energies: a correction for core-valence effects, a correction for scalar relativistic effects, a correction for first-order atomic spin-orbit effects, and vibrational zero-point energies. The calculated values substantially reduce the error limits for these species. A detailed comparison of adiabatic and diabatic bond dissociation energies (BDEs) is made and used to explain trends in the BDEs. Because the adiabatic BDEs of polyatomic molecules represent not only the energy required for breaking a specific bond but also contain any reorganization energies of the bonds in the resulting products, these BDEs can be quite different for each step in the stepwise loss of ligands in binary compounds. For example, the adiabatic BDE for the removal of one fluorine ligand from the very stable closed-shell SF6 molecule to give the unstable SF5 radical is 2.8 times the BDE needed for the removal of one fluorine ligand from the unstable SF5 radical to give the stable closed-shell SF4 molecule. Similarly, the BDE for the removal of one fluorine ligand from the stable closed-shell PF3O molecule to give the unstable PF2O radical is higher than the BDE needed to remove the oxygen atom to give the stable closed-shell PF3 molecule. The same principles govern the BDEs of the phosphorus fluorides and the sulfur oxofluorides. In polyatomic molecules, care must be exercised not to equate BDEs with the bond strengths of given bonds. The measurement of the bond strength or stiffness of a given bond represented by its force constant involves only a small displacement of the atoms near equilibrium and, therefore, does not involve any reorganization energies, i.e., it may be more appropriate to correlate with the diabatic product states.
Grant
Daniel J
DJ
Chemistry Department, The University of Alabama, Shelby Hall, Box 870336, Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487-0336, USA.
Matus
Myrna H
MH
Switzer
Jackson R
JR
Dixon
David A
DA
Francisco
Joseph S
JS
Christe
Karl O
KO