Functional outcome of ipsilateral intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to compare the functional outcome of patients with ipsilateral intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures treated with a reconstruction nail versus a sliding hip screw and retrograde nail.


METHODS
Retrospective cohort study.


METHODS
Two level 1 trauma centers.


METHODS
Twenty-six patients with ipsilateral intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures treated between 1993 and 2003 with a reconstruction nail (n=13) or with a sliding hip screw and retrograde nail (n=13).


METHODS
Internal fixation with a reconstruction nail or a sliding hip screw and retrograde nail.


METHODS
Functional outcome was measured using the Short Form-36 (SF-36), Short Musculoskeletal Functional Assessment (SMFA), and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS).


RESULTS
The average time to follow-up was 49.6 months. Functional outcome was significantly better in the sliding hip screw with retrograde nail group for the role emotional (P=0.001) and mental component scores (P=0.016) of the SF-36. This group also scored better on the LEFS, although not reaching statistical significance (P=0.099).


CONCLUSIONS
For most outcome measures, no significant differences in functional outcome scores were observed between the 2 treatment groups. The results of this study suggest the need for a randomized controlled trial with a larger sample size to more definitively compare the 2 fixation constructs.
Peskun
Christopher
C
Martin Orthopaedic Biomechanics Laboratory, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
McKee
Michael
M
Kreder
Hans
H
Stephen
David
D
McConnell
Alison
A
Schemitsch
Emil H
EH
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001863:Bone Screws; D005260:Female; D005264:Femoral Fractures / Q000601:surgery*; D005593:Fracture Fixation, Internal; D006620:Hip Fractures / Q000601:surgery*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D016896:Treatment Outcome