title: [One-stage revision operations for infection after hip arthroplasty].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To disscuss the therapeutic method of the postoperative infection after hip arthroplasty and compare the results of one-stage revision and two-stage revision.
  
  
  METHODS
  From January 1999 to December 2005, 15 cases of infection after hip arthroplasty were treated, including 10 males and 5 females, with a mean age of 63 years (54-71 years). The locations were left hip in 8 cases and right hip in 7 cases. The first operation was hip prosthesis replacement in 6 cases and tatol hip arthroplasty in 9 cases. Infection occurred after 1 month in 6 cases and after 6 months in 9 cases. The preoperative temperature and ruting blood test were normal, the mean erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) was 61 mm/h (34-80 mm/h), mean C-reactive protein (CRP) was 11.7 mg/L (5.4-21.0 mg/L). The mean Harris score was 33 (25-40). The X-ray films showed that periosteal reaction, osteolysis and loosening of prosthesis occurred. The time from the first operation to revision operation was 1-41 months (mean 7.3 months). The results of bacterial culture were positive in 11 cases. One-stage revision was performed in 10 cases, two-stage revision was performed in 5 cases.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of 15 cases, 6 were classified as early postoperative infection, 9 cases as late chonic infection. The microorganism cultures results of joint aspiration or pus in sinus were positive in 11 cases and negative in 4 cases before operation and during operation; 8 had staphylococcus epidermids infection, 2 escherichia coli infection and 1 staphylococcus aureus infection. Incision of revision operation healed by first intention. No re-infection, swelling and tenderness occurred after 19 months (12-37 months) of follow-up. Pain of hip joint disappeared in 14 cases, and only 1 case had mild pain when walking. ESR and CRP after operation decreased to normal range. The mean Harris score increased significantly to 84.2 (79-92) after revision, showing significant difference when compared with that before operation (P < 0.05).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  For postoperative infection after total hip arthroplasty, it is still possible to have satisfactory clinical outcome by one-stage or two-stage revision as long as clear diaglosis and correct treatment can made.
authors: Department of Orthopaedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou Jiangxi 341000, P.R. China. gaohui3721@163.com
authors: Hu
authors: H
authors: Gao
authors: Houshan
authors: H
authors: Lv
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000627:therapeutic use; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000009:adverse effects*; D001843:Bone Cements; D003131:Combined Modality Therapy; D004927:Escherichia coli Infections / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery / Q000628:therapy*; D005260:Female; D005839:Gentamicins / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000627:therapeutic use; D006622:Hip Prosthesis; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D016459:Prosthesis-Related Infections / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery / Q000628:therapy*; D012086:Reoperation; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013203:Staphylococcal Infections / Q000209:etiology / Q000601:surgery / Q000628:therapy*; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents; D001843:Bone Cements; D005839:Gentamicins