Explicit processing demands reveal language modality-specific organization of working memory.
The working memory model for Ease of Language Understanding (ELU) predicts that processing differences between language modalities emerge when cognitive demands are explicit. This prediction was tested in three working memory experiments with participants who were Deaf Signers (DS), Hearing Signers (HS), or Hearing Nonsigners (HN). Easily nameable pictures were used as stimuli to avoid confounds relating to sensory modality. Performance was largely similar for DS, HS, and HN, suggesting that previously identified intermodal differences may be due to differences in retention of sensory information. When explicit processing demands were high, differences emerged between DS and HN, suggesting that although working memory storage in both groups is sensitive to temporal organization, retrieval is not sensitive to temporal organization in DS. A general effect of semantic similarity was also found. These findings are discussed in relation to the ELU model.
Rudner
Mary
M
Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, The Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. mary.rudner@liu.se
Rönnberg
Jerker
J
D000328:Adult; D003638:Deafness / Q000523:psychology*; D005260:Female; D006236:Handwriting; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory; D011939:Mental Recall; D008960:Models, Psychological; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012691:Serial Learning; D012813:Sign Language; D013060:Speech; D013997:Time Factors; D014796:Visual Perception