title: The World Health Organization Performance Assessment Tool for Quality Improvement in Hospitals (PATH): an analysis of the pilot implementation in 37 hospitals.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To evaluate the pilot implementation of the World Health Organization Performance Assessment Tool for Quality Improvement in hospitals (PATH).
  
  
  METHODS
  Semi-structured interviews with regional/country coordinators and Internet-based survey distributed to hospital coordinators.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 37 hospitals in six regions/countries (Belgium, Ontario (Canada), Denmark, France, Slovakia, KwaZulu Natal (South Africa)).
  
  
  METHODS
  Six PATH regional/country coordinators and 37 PATH hospital coordinators.
  
  
  METHODS
  Implementation of a hospital performance assessment pilot project.
  
  
  METHODS
  Experience of regional/country coordinators (structured interviews) and experience of hospital coordinators (survey) with the pilot implementation.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The main achievement has been the collection and analysis of data on a set of indicators for comprehensive performance assessment in hospitals in regions and countries with different cultures and resource availability. Both regional/country coordinators and hospital coordinators required seed funding and technical support during data collection for implementation. Based on the user evaluation, we identified the following research and development tasks: further standardization and improved validity of indicators, increased use of routine data, more timely feedback with a stronger focus on international benchmarking and further support on interpretation of results.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Key to successful implementation was the embedding of PATH in existing performance measurement initiatives while acknowledging the core objective of the project as a self-improvement tool. The pilot test raised a number of organizational and methodological challenges in the design and implementation of international research on hospital performance assessment. Moreover, the process of evaluating PATH resulted in interesting learning points for other existing and newly emerging quality indicator projects.
authors: Quality of Health Systems and Services, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark. ogroene@fadq.org
authors: Oliver
authors: O
authors: Groene
authors: Niek
authors: N
authors: Klazinga
authors: Vahé
authors: V
authors: Kazandjian
authors: Pierre
authors: P
authors: Lombrail
authors: Paul
authors: P
authors: Bartels
mesh_terms: D005060:Europe; D006761:Hospitals / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D009864:Ontario; D010865:Pilot Projects; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000379:methods* / Q000458:organization & administration; D019984:Quality Indicators, Health Care / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D013019:South Africa; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014944:World Health Organization