Can APB 2000 be used to discern sincerity of effort in unimpaired subjects from maximal performance in subjects with shoulder pain?
The automated pegboard (APB 2000), which has been found to objectively quantify motor performance, was used to differentiate maximal motor performance among subjects with shoulder pain, healthy unimpaired subjects performing normally and also while feigning shoulder pain. Six participants with shoulder pain and 15 healthy unimpaired individuals participated. Individuals with shoulder pain were tested on the APB 2000 using their affected upper extremity. Unimpaired participants were instructed to perform normally on the test with randomly selected upper extremity and to feign shoulder pain with the other upper extremity. The two tests for the unimpaired participants were conducted 1 week apart. There were significant differences in mean performance time for normal, patient, and feigned performance, with 80, 111, and 149 sec for the three groups respectively (p < 0.0005). There was also considerable overlap in the three distributions of performance times. These preliminary findings suggest that the APB 2000 is able to distinguish performance time between these three groups. Whether it can be used to distinguish between maximal performance and submaximal performance in individuals suspected of submaximal performance requires further study.
Lohman
Everett B
EB
Department of Physical Therapy, Loma Linda University, School of Allied Health Professions, Loma Linda, CA 92350, USA. elohman@llu.edu
Thorpe
Donna L
DL
Prior
Marilyn
M
George
James
J
Kim
Jimmy P
JP
D000328:Adult; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008306:Malingering / Q000175:diagnosis*; D008875:Middle Aged; D009068:Movement; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D020069:Shoulder Pain / Q000175:diagnosis*