title: Morbidity and recurrence after completion lymph node dissection following sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous malignant melanoma.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To assess the nature and rates of complications and recurrences after completion lymph node dissection (CLND) following positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in melanoma patients.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  In contrast to SLNB, CLND is associated with considerable morbidity. CLND delays nodal recurrence, thereby prolonging disease-free survival (DFS), but not overall melanoma-specific survival. Elaborate studies on morbidity and recurrence rates after CLND are scarce. Therefore, many controversies concerning extent and nature of CLND exist.
  
  
  METHODS
  We conducted a retrospective study on 100 melanoma patients, on whom we performed CLND between October 1999 and December 2005. The median observation period was 38.8 months.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We performed a total of 102 CLNDs, [46.1% axillary (47/102), 42.2% groin (43/102), 11.8% neck (12/102)]. Groin dissection (GD) and axillary dissection (AD) led to comparable morbidity (47.6% and 46.8%), but complications were more severe in GD, mandating additional surgery in 25.6% (11/43), versus 8.5% (4/47) in AD. Of the GD patients, 18.5% (8/43) were readmitted for complications compared with 10.4% (5/47) of AD patients. Only 8.3% (1/12) of ND patients suffered complications, mandating neither readmittance nor further surgery. During the median observation period, 65 (65%) of these patients showed DFS, and 35 (35%) exhibited recurrences after a median DFS of 12.5 months. Of the recurrences, 31.4% were nodal, 42.9% distant, and 25.7% local/in-transit. Of our AD patients, 28.3% suffered recurrences (13/46), as did 33.3% of the GD (14/42) and 66.7% of the ND patients (8/12).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  CLND is fraught with considerable morbidity. Local control of the dissected nodal basins was achieved with a modified radical approach in ADs (levels I + II only) and, to a lesser extent, GDs, but not in NDs. Clinical trials are necessary to establish guidelines on the extent of lymphatic dissection.
authors: Department of Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland. Merlin@gmx.ch
authors: Merlin M
authors: MM
authors: Guggenheim
authors: Urs
authors: U
authors: Hug
authors: Florian J
authors: FJ
authors: Jung
authors: Valentin
authors: V
authors: Rousson
authors: Matthias C
authors: MC
authors: Aust
authors: Maurizio
authors: M
authors: Calcagni
authors: Walter
authors: W
authors: Künzi
authors: Pietro
authors: P
authors: Giovanoli
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D018572:Disease-Free Survival; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008197:Lymph Node Excision / Q000009:adverse effects*; D008198:Lymph Nodes / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D008545:Melanoma / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery; D008875:Middle Aged; D009017:Morbidity; D012008:Recurrence; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D021701:Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy; D012878:Skin Neoplasms / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery