Assessment of sedentary behavior with the International Physical Activity Questionnaire.
OBJECTIVE
This study explored definitions of sedentary behavior and examined the relationship between sitting time and physical inactivity using the sitting items from the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ).


METHODS
Participants (N = 289, 44.6% male, mean age = 35.93) from 3 countries completed self-administered long- and short-IPAQ sitting items. Participants wore accelerometers; were classified as inactive (no leisure-time activity), insufficiently active, or meeting recommendations; and were classified into tertiles of sitting behavior.


RESULTS
Reliability of sitting time was acceptable for men and women. Correlations between total sitting and accelerometer counts/min <100 were significant for both long (r = .33) and short (r = .34) forms. There was no agreement between tertiles of sitting and the inactivity category (kappa = .02, P = .68).


CONCLUSIONS
Sedentary behavior should be explicitly measured in population surveillance and research instead of being defined by lack of physical activity.
Rosenberg
Dori E
DE
Joint Doctoral Program in Clinical Psychology, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182, USA.
Bull
Fiona C
FC
Marshall
Alison L
AL
Sallis
James F
JF
Bauman
Adrian E
AE
D000328:Adult; D003625:Data Collection / Q000379:methods; D015444:Exercise; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires