Short-term aftereffects of response inhibition: repetition priming or between-trial control adjustments?
Repetition priming and between-trial control adjustments after successful and unsuccessful response inhibition were studied in the stop-signal paradigm. In 5 experiments, the authors demonstrated that response latencies increased after successful inhibition compared with trials that followed no-signal trials. However, this effect was found only when the stimulus (Experiments 1A-4) or stimulus category (Experiment 3) was repeated. Slightly different results were found after trials on which the response inhibition failed. In Experiments 1A, 2, and 4, response latencies increased after unsuccessful inhibition trials compared with after no-inhibition trials, and this happened whether or not the stimulus repeated. Based on these results, we suggest that the aftereffects of successful response inhibition are primarily due to repetition priming, although there was evidence for between-trial control adjustments when inhibition failed.
Verbruggen
Frederick
F
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University. frederick.verbruggen@ugent.be
Logan
Gordon D
GD
Liefooghe
Baptist
B
Vandierendonck
André
A
D000223:Adaptation, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001245:Association Learning; D006801:Humans; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D011214:Practice, Psychological; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology*; D012016:Reference Values; D013997:Time Factors