title: Integrating patient satisfaction into performance measurement to meet improvement challenges.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  A Value Compass has been proposed to guide health care data collection. The "compass corners" represent the four types of data needed to meet health care customer expectations: appropriate clinical outcomes, improved functional status, patient satisfaction, and appropriate costs. Collection of all four types of data is necessary to select processes in need of improvement, guide improvement teams, and monitor the success of improvement efforts. INTEGRATED DATA AT BRYANLGH: BryanLGH Medical Center in Lincoln, Nebraska, has adopted multiple performance measurement systems to collect clinical outcome, financial, and patient satisfaction data into integrated databases. Data integration allows quality professionals at BryanLGH to identify quality issues from multiple perspectives and track the interrelated effects of improvement efforts. A CASE EXAMPLE: Data from the fourth quarter of 1997 indicated the need to improve processes related to cesarean section (C-section) deliveries. An interdisciplinary team was formed, which focused on educating nurses, physicians, and the community about labor support measures. Physicians were given their own rates of C-section deliveries.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The C-section rate decreased from 27% to 19%, but per-case cost increased. PickerPLUS+ results indicated that BryanLGH obstetric patients reported fewer problems with receiving information than the Picker norm, but they reported more problems with the involvement of family members and friends.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The data collected so far have indicated a decrease in the C-section rate and a need to continue to work on cost and psychosocial issues. A complete analysis of results was facilitated by integrated performance management systems. Successes have been easily tracked over time, and the need for further work on related processes has been clearly identified.
authors: Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, USA. jsmith@acgme.org
authors: J E
authors: JE
authors: Smith
authors: D L
authors: DL
authors: Fisher
authors: J J
authors: JJ
authors: Endorf-Olson
mesh_terms: D019985:Benchmarking; D002585:Cesarean Section / Q000191:economics; D003628:Database Management Systems; D016208:Databases, Factual; D036861:Delivery, Obstetric / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D017721:Hospital Costs; D006801:Humans; D017146:Models, Organizational; D009096:Multi-Institutional Systems / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000592:standards*; D009329:Nebraska; D009775:Obstetrics and Gynecology Department, Hospital / Q000191:economics / Q000592:standards; D019982:Organizational Case Studies; D017060:Patient Satisfaction / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D011247:Pregnancy; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D018511:Systems Integration