Quantification of cardiac magnetic field orientation during ventricular de- and repolarization.
We compared the stability and discriminatory power of different methods of determining cardiac magnetic field map (MFM) orientation within the context of coronary artery disease (CAD). In 27 healthy subjects and 24 CAD patients, multichannel magnetocardiograms were registered at rest. MFM orientation was determined during QT interval using: (a) locations of the positive and negative centres-of-gravity, (b) locations of the field extrema and (c) the direction of the maximum field gradient. Deviation from normal orientation quantified the ability of each approach to discriminate between healthy and CAD subjects. Although the course of orientation was similar for all methods, receiver operating characteristic analysis showed the best discrimination of CAD patients for the centre-of-gravity approach (area-under-the-curve = 86%), followed by the gradient (84%) and extrema (76%) methods. Consideration of methodological and discriminatory advantages with respect to noninvasive diagnosis of CAD suggests that the centres-of-gravity method is the most suited one.
Van Leeuwen
Peter
P
Department of Biomagnetism, Grönemeyer Institute of Microtherapy, Bochum, Germany. petervl@microtherapy.de
Hailer
Birgit
B
Lange
Silke
S
Klein
Anita
A
Geue
Daniel
D
Seybold
Katrin
K
Poplutz
Christian
C
Grönemeyer
Dietrich
D
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D019540:Area Under Curve; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D003324:Coronary Artery Disease / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology; D004574:Electromagnetic Fields; D005260:Female; D006352:Heart Ventricles / Q000473:pathology*; D006801:Humans; D015225:Magnetoencephalography / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012372:ROC Curve; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity