title: Efficacy of laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy in the management of menorrhagia: 400 consecutive cases.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To assess the safety and patient satisfaction of laparoscopic subtotal hysterectomy (LSH) using a standardised surgical technique.
  
  
  METHODS
  Prospective observational study.
  
  
  METHODS
  Princess Royal University Hospital, Chelsfield Park Hospital and Sloane Hospital, Kent, UK.
  
  
  METHODS
  Four hundred consecutive women with menorrhagia underwent LSH. The procedure was performed using the Plasma Kinetic Bipolar Diathermy (Gyrus International Ltd, Berkshire, UK) for pedicle ligation and the Lap Loop system (Roberts Surgical Healthcare Ltd, Kidderminster, UK) to detach the cervix. An electromechanical morcellator (Morcellex; Ethicon Women's Health and Urology, Cincinnati, OH, USA) was used to remove the uterus from the abdominal cavity.
  
  
  METHODS
  Patient satisfaction, morbidity rates and readmission rates.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 400 LSH were performed between February 2003 and November 2006. The principal clinical indication for hysterectomy was menorrhagia. The mean duration of surgery was 46.4 minutes. The mean operative blood loss was 126 ml. Concurrent surgery was performed in 141 women. Minor and major perioperative complications were encountered in 5% (n= 20) of women. The major complication rate was 1.2% (n= 5): three women (0.75%) with bladder perforation, two women (0.5%) with bowel injury and one woman (0.25%) with a vesicocervical fistula. Eight women (2%) suffered from cyclical vaginal bleeding postoperatively.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  LSH is a safe and effective treatment for menorrhagia and other menstrual disorders when hysterectomy is indicated. Women appreciate the quick recovery period, reduced time off work and faster return to normal activity. Our data suggest that LSH can replace abdominal hysterectomy in selected cases.
authors.affiliation: Minimal Access Surgery unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Princess Royal University Hospital, Orpington, Kent, UK.
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Erian
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hassan
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Pachydakis
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Chandakas
authors.forename: I
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Wissa
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Hill
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007044:Hysterectomy / Q000379:methods* / Q000523:psychology; D007431:Intraoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000379:methods*; D007902:Length of Stay; D008595:Menorrhagia / Q000601:surgery*; D008875:Middle Aged; D010359:Patient Readmission / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology; D011446:Prospective Studies; D012008:Recurrence; D016896:Treatment Outcome