Development of analytical procedures for the determination of hexavalent chromium in corrosion prevention coatings used in the automotive industry.
The European directive 2000/53/EC limits the use of Cr(VI) in vehicle manufacturing. Although a maximum of 2 g of Cr(VI) was authorised per vehicle for corrosion prevention coatings of key components, since July 2007 its use has been prohibited except for some particular applications. Therefore, the objective of this work was to develop direct analytical procedures for Cr(VI) determination in the different steel coatings used for screws. Instead of working directly with screws, the optimisation of the procedures was carried out with metallic plates homogeneously coated to improve the data comparability. Extraction of Cr(VI) from the metallic parts was performed by sonication. Two extraction solutions were tested: a direct water extraction solution used in standard protocols and an ammonium/ammonia buffer solution at pH 8.9. The extracts were further analysed for Cr speciation by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) inductively coupled plasma (ICP) atomic emission spectrometry or HPLC ICP mass spectrometry depending on the concentration level. When possible, the coatings were also directly analysed by solid speciation techniques (X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, XPS, and X-ray absorption near-edge structure, XANES) for validation of the results. Very good results between the different analytical approaches were obtained for the sample of coating made up of a heated paint containing Zn, Al and Cr when using the extracting buffer solution at pH 8.9. After a repeated four-step extraction procedure on the same portion test, taking into account the depth of the surface layer reached, good agreement with XPS and XANES results was obtained. In contrast, for the coatings composed of an alkaline Zn layer where Cr(VI) and Cr(III) are deposited, only the extraction procedure using water allowed the detection of Cr(VI). To elucidate the Cr(VI) reduction during extraction at pH 8.9, the reactivity of Cr(VI) towards different species of Zn generally present in the coatings (metallic Zn and zinc oxide) was studied. The results showed that metallic Zn rapidly reduces Cr(VI), whereas this reaction is less evident in the presence of zinc oxide. Water was then retained for coatings containing metallic Zn.
Séby
F
F
Ultra Traces Analyses Aquitaine, Hélioparc Pau-Pyrénées, 2, avenue du Président Angot, 64053, Pau Cedex 9, France. fabienne.seby@univ-pau.fr
Castetbon
A
A
Ortega
R
R
Guimon
C
C
Niveau
F
F
Barrois-Oudin
N
N
Garraud
H
H
Donard
O F X
OF
D002274:Carcinogens, Environmental / Q000032:analysis*; D002851:Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid / Q000379:methods; D002857:Chromium / Q000032:analysis*; D003343:Corrosion; D006863:Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; D007221:Industry; D010150:Paint / Q000032:analysis*; D012996:Solutions / Q000032:analysis; D013010:Sonication; D013054:Spectrophotometry, Atomic / Q000379:methods; D013232:Steel; D014867:Water / Q000032:analysis; D014965:X-Rays; D015032:Zinc / Q000032:analysis; D015034:Zinc Oxide / Q000032:analysis
D002274:Carcinogens, Environmental; D012996:Solutions; D014867:Water; D002857:Chromium; D013232:Steel; C074702:chromium hexavalent ion; D015032:Zinc; D015034:Zinc Oxide