Enhancement of chromatic contrast increases predation risk for striped butterflies.
Many prey species have evolved defensive colour patterns to avoid attacks. One type of camouflage, disruptive coloration, relies on contrasting patterns that hinder predators' ability to recognize an object. While high contrasts are used to facilitate detection in many visual communication systems, they are thought to provide misleading information about prey appearance in disruptive patterns. A fundamental tenet in disruptive coloration theory is the principle of 'maximum disruptive contrast', i.e. disruptive patterns are more effective when higher contrasts are involved. We tested this principle in highly contrasting stripes that have often been described as disruptive patterns. Varying the strength of chromatic contrast between stripes and adjacent pattern elements in artificial butterflies, we found a strong negative correlation between survival probability and chromatic contrast strength. We conclude that too high a contrast leads to increased conspicuousness rather than to effective camouflage. However, artificial butterflies that sported contrasts similar to those of the model species Limenitis camilla survived equally well as background-matching butterflies without these stripes. Contrasting stripes do thus not necessarily increase predation rates. This result may provide new insights into the design and characteristics of a range of colour patterns such as sexual, mimetic and aposematic signals.
Stobbe
Nina
N
Faculty of Biology I, Department of Evolutionary Biology and Animal Ecology, University of Freiburg, Haupstrasse 1a, 79104 Freiburg, Germany. nina.stobbe@biologie.uni-freiburg.de
Schaefer
H Martin
HM
D000819:Animal Communication; D000818:Animals; D002080:Butterflies / Q000502:physiology*; D003118:Color Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D015350:Contrast Sensitivity / Q000502:physiology*; D020387:Food Chain; D010858:Pigmentation / Q000502:physiology*; D016019:Survival Analysis