title: A prospective evaluation of computerized tomographic (CT) scanning as a screening modality for esophageal varices.
abstract: Patients with cirrhosis require endoscopic screening for large esophageal varices. The aims of this study were to determine the cost-effectiveness and patient preferences of a strategy employing abdominal computerized tomography (CT) as the initial screening test for identifying large esophageal varices. In a prospective evaluation,102 patients underwent both CT and endoscopic screening for gastroesophageal varices. Two radiologists read each CT independently; standard upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was the reference standard. Agreement between radiologists, and between endoscopists regarding size of varices was determined using kappa statistic. Cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to determine the optimal screening strategy for varices. Patient preference was assessed by questionnaire. CT was found to have approximately 90% sensitivity in the identification of esophageal varices determined to be large on endoscopy, but only about 50% specificity. The sensitivity of CT in detecting gastric varices was 87%. In addition, a significant number of gastric varices, peri-esophageal varices, and extraluminal pathology were identified by CT that were not identified by endoscopy. Patients overwhelmingly preferred CT over endoscopy. Agreement between radiologists was good regarding the size of varices (Kappa = 0.56), and exceeded agreement between endoscopists (Kappa = 0.36). Use of CT as the initial screening modality for the detection of varices was significantly more cost-effective compared to endoscopy irrespective of the prevalence of large varices.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Abdominal CT as the initial screening test for varices could be cost-effective. CT also permits evaluation of extra-luminal pathology that impacts management.
authors.affiliation: Advanced Liver Diseases Study Group, Miles and Shirley Fiterman Center for Digestive Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
authors.forename: Roman E
authors.initials: RE
authors.lastname: Perri
authors.forename: Michael V
authors.initials: MV
authors.lastname: Chiorean
authors.forename: Jeff L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Fidler
authors.forename: Joel G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Fletcher
authors.forename: Jayant A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Talwalkar
authors.forename: Linda
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Stadheim
authors.forename: Nilay D
authors.initials: ND
authors.lastname: Shah
authors.forename: Patrick S
authors.initials: PS
authors.lastname: Kamath
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003287:Contrast Media; D004724:Endoscopy; D004932:Esophageal and Gastric Varices / Q000145:classification / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000209:etiology / Q000473:pathology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008103:Liver Cirrhosis / Q000150:complications; D008107:Liver Diseases / Q000150:complications / Q000209:etiology; D008297:Male; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000379:methods; D008875:Middle Aged; D018579:Patient Selection; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods*
chemical_list: D003287:Contrast Media