Two challenges for the classification of sexual dysfunction.
BACKGROUND
The current classification of sexual function (in particular, the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, DSM-IV) has lately attracted significant criticism at both research and clinical levels. Despite this, there has been a reluctance to return to the drawing board. Instead, attempts to improve the system have been marginal, constrained by the need to secure professional consensus, the desire for continuity with traditional categories, and the emphasis on diagnostic agreement (reliability).


OBJECTIVE
In this article, we examine two key challenges currently faced by the DSM: how to effectively acknowledge the relational context of sexual problems and how to avoid pathologizing normal variation.


RESULTS
We raise some possible new directions, such as ways in which relational processes could be integrated into the current system, and possibilities for introducing a dimensional rather than a categorical model of sexual function.


CONCLUSIONS
We argue that if the next version of DSM (version V) is to avoid the weaknesses inherent in the present system, then a return to the drawing board is precisely what is required.
Mitchell
Kirstin
K
Sexual Health Programme, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Graham
Cynthia A
CA
D039721:Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; D006801:Humans; D012725:Sexual Behavior; D012735:Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological / Q000145:classification* / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000523:psychology