title: Can the irrelevant speech effect turn into a stimulus suffix effect?
abstract: The irrelevant sound effect (ISE) and the stimulus suffix effect (SSE) are two qualitatively different phenomena, although in both paradigms irrelevant auditory material is played while a verbal serial recall task is being performed. Jones, Macken, and Nicholls (2004) have proposed the effect of irrelevant speech on auditory serial recall to switch from an ISE to an SSE mechanism, if the auditory-perceptive similarity of relevant and irrelevant material is maximized. The experiment reported here (n = 36) tested this hypothesis by exploring auditory serial recall performance both under irrelevant speech and under speech suffix conditions. These speech materials were spoken either by the same voice as the auditory items to be recalled or by a different voice. The experimental conditions were such that the likelihood of obtaining an SSE was maximized. The results, however, show that irrelevant speech - in contrast to speech suffixes - affects auditory serial recall independently of its perceptive similarity to the items to be recalled and thus in terms of an ISE mechanism that crucially extends to recency. The ISE thus cannot turn into an SSE.
authors.affiliation: Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Eichstätt, Germany.
authors.forename: Sabine J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Schlittmeier
authors.forename: Jürgen
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Hellbrück
authors.forename: Maria
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Klatte
mesh_terms: D000161:Acoustic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D000328:Adult; D001307:Auditory Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall / Q000502:physiology; D013060:Speech / Q000502:physiology*; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D014705:Verbal Behavior / Q000502:physiology*