Electrodermal and phasic heart rate responses in the Guilty Actions Test: comparing guilty examinees to informed and uninformed innocents.
The present mock-crime study concentrated on the validity of the Guilty Actions Test (GAT) and the role of the orienting response (OR) for differential autonomic responding. N=105 female subjects were assigned to one of three groups: a guilty group, members of which committed a mock-theft; an innocent-aware group, members of which witnessed the theft; and an innocent-unaware group. A GAT consisting of ten question sets was administered while measuring electrodermal and heart rate (HR) responses. For informed participants (guilty and innocent-aware), relevant items were accompanied by larger skin conductance responses and heart rate decelerations whereas irrelevant items elicited HR accelerations. Uninformed participants showed a non-systematic response pattern. The differential electrodermal responses of informed participants declined across the test. With respect to the HR data, however, no habituation was observed. Findings suggest that GAT results could not exclusively be interpreted by referring to the OR.
Gamer
Matthias
M
Department of Systems Neuroscience, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany. m.gamer@uke.uni-hamburg.de
Gödert
Heinz Werner
HW
Keth
Alexander
A
Rill
Hans-Georg
HG
Vossel
Gerhard
G
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D003417:Criminal Psychology; D004562:Electrocardiography / Q000379:methods; D030141:Feedback, Psychological; D005260:Female; D005712:Galvanic Skin Response / Q000502:physiology*; D006167:Guilt; D006185:Habituation, Psychophysiologic; D006339:Heart Rate / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D012372:ROC Curve; D015203:Reproducibility of Results