title: Effectiveness of accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation intervention compared to current intervention after hip and knee arthroplasty. A before-after trial of 247 patients with a 3-month follow-up.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  In Denmark, approximately 12,000 hip and knee arthroplasties were performed in 2006, and the hospital costs were close to US$ 110,000,000. In a randomized clinical trial, we have recently demonstrated the efficacy of accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation intervention after hip and knee arthroplasty compared to current intervention under ideal circumstances. We do not, however, know whether these results could be reached under usual circumstances of healthcare practice. We therefore investigated whether length of stay after implementation of accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation after hip and knee arthroplasty could be reduced in a normal healthcare setting, and how the achieved results matched those observed during the randomized clinical trial.
  
  
  METHODS
  An effectiveness study as a before-after trial was undertaken in which all elective primary total hip and total knee arthroplasty patients were divided into a before-implementation group receiving the current perioperative procedure, and an after-implementation group receiving the new accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation procedures as provided by a new multi-disciplinary organization. We used the Breakthrough Series Collaborative Model for implementation. The primary outcome measure was in hospital length of stay (LOS), and the secondary outcome measure was adverse effects within 3 months postoperatively.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We included a total of 247 patients. Mean LOS was significantly (P < 0.001) reduced by 4.4 (95% CI 3.8-5.0) days after implementation of the accelerated intervention, from 8.8 (SD 3.0) days before implementation to 4.3 (SD 1.8) days after implementation. No significant differences in adverse effects were observed. LOS in this effectiveness study was significantly lower than LOS reported in the efficacy study.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation intervention after hip and knee arthroplasty was successfully and effectively implemented. Results obtained during usual hospital circumstances matched the results achieved under ideal circumstances in this group of patients.
authors.affiliation: Orthopedic Research Unit, Regional Hospital Holstebro, Denmark. fekl2004@msn.com
authors.forename: Kristian
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Larsen
authors.forename: Karen Elisabeth
authors.initials: KE
authors.lastname: Hvass
authors.forename: Torben B
authors.initials: TB
authors.lastname: Hansen
authors.forename: Per B
authors.initials: PB
authors.lastname: Thomsen
authors.forename: Kjeld
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Søballe
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000379:methods* / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Q000379:methods* / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D007902:Length of Stay; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D019990:Perioperative Care / Q000379:methods*; D011446:Prospective Studies; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Q000379:methods