[The O. J. Simpson case. Guilty or innocent?].
On October 3, 1995, one hundred million of Americans gathered at their TV sets to learn the verdict in the ex-football player O. J. Simpson case. The verdict was the consequence of a skilful defense and numerous mistakes made by prosecution. Despite copious evidence, including DNA test results indicating the guilt of thedefendant, the jury decided that O. J. Simpson was not guilty. The aim of this paper is to present the unique character of this trial and defense strategy used by a group of six attorneys, who worked on that case.
Gałeska-Sliwka
Anita
A
Z Zakładu Podstaw Prawa Medycznego Collegium Medicum im. L. Rydygiera w Bydgoszczy, Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu.
Wolska
Ewa
E
D002140:California; D016172:DNA Fingerprinting / Q000266:history*; D005104:Expert Testimony; D005197:Famous Persons; D005538:Football / Q000266:history; D005554:Forensic Medicine / Q000266:history*; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006708:Homicide