A new protein linear motif benchmark for multiple sequence alignment software.
BACKGROUND
Linear motifs (LMs) are abundant short regulatory sites used for modulating the functions of many eukaryotic proteins. They play important roles in post-translational modification, cell compartment targeting, docking sites for regulatory complex assembly and protein processing and cleavage. Methods for LM detection are now being developed that are strongly dependent on scores for motif conservation in homologous proteins. However, most LMs are found in natively disordered polypeptide segments that evolve rapidly, unhindered by structural constraints on the sequence. These regions of modular proteins are difficult to align using classical multiple sequence alignment programs that are specifically optimised to align the globular domains. As a consequence, poor motif alignment quality is hindering efforts to detect new LMs.


RESULTS
We have developed a new benchmark, as part of the BAliBASE suite, designed to assess the ability of standard multiple alignment methods to detect and align LMs. The reference alignments are organised into different test sets representing real alignment problems and contain examples of experimentally verified functional motifs, extracted from the Eukaryotic Linear Motif (ELM) database. The benchmark has been used to evaluate and compare a number of multiple alignment programs. With distantly related proteins, the worst alignment program correctly aligns 48% of LMs compared to 73% for the best program. However, the performance of all the programs is adversely affected by the introduction of other sequences containing false positive motifs. The ranking of the alignment programs based on LM alignment quality is similar to that observed when considering full-length protein alignments, however little correlation was observed between LM and overall alignment quality for individual alignment test cases.


CONCLUSIONS
We have shown that none of the programs currently available is capable of reliably aligning LMs in distantly related sequences and we have highlighted a number of specific problems. The results of the tests suggest possible ways to improve program accuracy for difficult, divergent sequences.
Perrodou
Emmanuel
E
Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Department of Structural Biology and Genomics, F-67400 Illkirch, France. perrodou@igbmc.u-strasbg.fr
Chica
Claudia
C
Poch
Olivier
O
Gibson
Toby J
TJ
Thompson
Julie D
JD
D020816:Amino Acid Motifs; D001185:Artificial Intelligence; D010363:Pattern Recognition, Automated / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D011506:Proteins / Q000032:analysis / Q000648:ultrastructure; D040901:Proteomics / Q000379:methods; D011786:Quality Control; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D016415:Sequence Alignment / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D017386:Sequence Homology, Amino Acid; D012986:Software Validation; D014584:User-Computer Interface
D011506:Proteins