title: How physicians allocate scarce resources at the bedside: a systematic review of qualitative studies.
abstract: Although rationing of scarce health-care resources is inevitable in clinical practice, there is still limited and scattered information about how physicians perceive and execute this bedside rationing (BSR) and how it can be performed in an ethically fair way. This review gives a systematic overview on physicians' perspectives on influences, strategies, and consequences of health-care rationing. Relevant references as identified by systematically screening major electronic databases and manuscript references were synthesized by thematic analysis. Retrieved studies focused on themes that fell under three major headings: (i) conditions and influences of BSR, (ii) strategies of BSR, and (iii) consequences of BSR. The range of themes indicates that physicians' rationing behavior is highly variable, strongly influenced by context-related factors, and consists mainly of implicit rationing strategies. Torn between patient advocacy and the obligation to contain costs, physicians experience various role conflicts. The development of explicit rationing strategies seems necessary to avoid arbitrary BSR and allow a fair allocation of health-care resources.
authors.affiliation: Institut für Ethik und Geschichte der Medizin, Eberhard-Karls Universität, Schleichstrasse 8, 72076 Tübingen, Germany. daniel.strech@uni-tuebingen.de
authors.forename: Daniel
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Strech
authors.forename: Matthis
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Synofzik
authors.forename: Georg
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Marckmann
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D026690:Ethics, Clinical; D015276:Health Care Rationing; D006801:Humans; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D010820:Physicians / Q000523:psychology*; D040841:Resource Allocation / Q000941:ethics / Q000379:methods