title: The ethics of information: absolute risk reduction and patient understanding of screening.
abstract: Some experts have argued that patients should routinely be told the specific magnitude and absolute probability of potential risks and benefits of screening tests. This position is motivated by the idea that framing risk information in ways that are less precise violates the ethical principle of respect for autonomy and its application in informed consent or shared decision-making. In this Perspective, we consider a number of problems with this view that have not been adequately addressed. The most important challenges stem from the danger that patients will misunderstand the information or have irrational responses to it. Any initiative in this area should take such factors into account and should consider carefully how to apply the ethical principles of respect for autonomy and beneficence.
authors.affiliation: Indiana University Center for Bioethics, Indianapolis, IN 46202, USA. phschwar@iupui.edu
authors.forename: Peter H
authors.initials: PH
authors.lastname: Schwartz
authors.forename: Eric M
authors.initials: EM
authors.lastname: Meslin
mesh_terms: D003657:Decision Making; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000009:adverse effects*; D010353:Patient Education as Topic / Q000941:ethics / Q000379:methods; D010358:Patient Participation; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D011322:Primary Prevention / Q000379:methods; D018570:Risk Assessment; D040242:Risk Reduction Behavior