title: Colonic lavage with two polyethylene glycol solutions prior to colonoscopy makes no difference: a prospective randomized controlled trial.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  It is suggested that bowel preparations for colonoscopy are easier to tolerate when a smaller volume of solution with a more pleasant taste is used. The aim of this study was to establish equivalence between a 3-l sulphate-free polyethylene glycol solution (SF-PEG) and a 4-l PEG solution in effectiveness, patients' acceptability and tolerability.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study comprised 110 patients scheduled for elective colonoscopy and randomized to receive either SF-PEG or PEG. Before colonoscopy, the patients completed a questionnaire on stool frequency, medication, concomitant diseases, the amount of solution ingested, willingness to re-take it, volume of other fluid taken and tolerance of bowel preparation, taste of the laxative and occurrence of abdominal cramps. Three experienced endoscopists, blinded to the type of preparation, assigned bowel-cleansing scores using a validated 5-point scale to assess cleansing effect.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Data were available for 102 patients (44 M (40%), mean age 53 years, range 23-83 years). No significant differences were found in cleansing the rectosigmoid (p = 0.71) or complete colon (p = 0.79). Diverticulosis, constipation, gender and body mass index (BMI) did not influence cleansing. There was no significant difference in compliance between the two groups (p = 0.61). No differences were found for tolerance, taste and abdominal cramps. Patients who received SF-PEG had a preference for the same preparation next time in comparison with patients who had PEG cleansing (17 (33%) versus 4 (8%), respectively) (p = 0.03).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Both preparations are comparable in their cleansing effect and toleration. However, patients prefer cleansing with a smaller volume of solution. Improving the acceptability of colonic preparation could improve willingness to undergo colonoscopies in the future.
authors.affiliation: Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Maria M
authors.initials: MM
authors.lastname: Szojda
authors.forename: Dirk J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Kuik
authors.forename: Chris J J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Mulder
authors.forename: Richelle J F
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Felt-Bersma
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D002314:Cardioplegic Solutions; D003113:Colonoscopy; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D054368:Laxatives / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D011092:Polyethylene Glycols / Q000008:administration & dosage*; D007507:Therapeutic Irrigation
chemical_list: D002314:Cardioplegic Solutions; D054368:Laxatives; D011092:Polyethylene Glycols