title: The clock-drawing test: time for a change?
abstract: Clock-drawing tests are simple and rapid screening devices for dementia. It was observed that individuals <60 years of age showed similar performance with a digital prompt (" . . .make the clock read 12:45") or an analog prompt (" . . .quarter to 1"), whereas individuals >70 years of age showed improved performance with an analog prompt. The digital prompt has routinely been used to force participants to recode the prompt via conceptualization. Differential scoring across a range of ages has likely derived from the advent and increase of digital clocks with the younger segment of the population. This implies the need for as-yet undetermined alteration in the nature of prompts to force recoding as the current younger population ages.
authors.affiliation: Center for Cellular Neurobiology and Neurodegeneration Research, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Lowell, MA 01854, USA.
authors.forename: Amy
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Chan
authors.forename: Ruth
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Remington
authors.forename: James
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Paskavitz
authors.forename: Thomas B
authors.initials: TB
authors.lastname: Shea
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D017677:Age Distribution; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000465:Algorithms; D015331:Cohort Studies; D003704:Dementia / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000523:psychology; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011594:Psychometrics / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013998:Time Perception / Q000502:physiology*