Enhancing autonomy in paid surrogacy.
The gestational surrogate--and her economic and educational vulnerability in particular--is the focus of many of the most persistent worries about paid surrogacy. Those who employ her, and those who broker and organize her services, usually have an advantage over her in resources and information. That asymmetry exposes her to the possibility of exploitation and abuse. Accordingly, some argue for banning paid surrogacy. Others defend legal permission on grounds of surrogate autonomy, but often retain concerns about the surrogate. In response to the dilemma of a ban versus bald permission, we propose a 'soft law' approach: states should require several hours of education of surrogates--education aimed at informing and enhancing surrogate autonomy.
Damelio
Jennifer
J
Dept. of Philosophy, Ursinus College, Collegeville, Pennsylvania 19426, USA. ksorensen@ursinus.edu
Sorensen
Kelly
K
D001675:Bioethics; D003068:Coercion; D003657:Decision Making; D026689:Ethical Analysis; D005249:Fees and Charges; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D011247:Pregnancy; D013533:Gestational Carriers / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000523:psychology