Reading between the lies: identifying concealed and falsified emotions in universal facial expressions.
The widespread supposition that aspects of facial communication are uncontrollable and can betray a deceiver's true emotion has received little empirical attention. We examined the presence of inconsistent emotional expressions and "microexpressions" (1/25-1/5 of a second) in genuine and deceptive facial expressions. Participants viewed disgusting, sad, frightening, happy, and neutral images, responding to each with a genuine or deceptive (simulated, neutralized, or masked) expression. Each 1/30-s frame (104,550 frames in 697 expressions) was analyzed for the presence and duration of universal expressions, microexpressions, and blink rate. Relative to genuine emotions, masked emotions were associated with more inconsistent expressions and an elevated blink rate; neutralized emotions showed a decreased blink rate. Negative emotions were more difficult to falsify than happiness. Although untrained observers performed only slightly above chance at detecting deception, inconsistent emotional leakage occurred in 100% of participants at least once and lasted longer than the current definition of a microexpression suggests. Microexpressions were exhibited by 21.95% of participants in 2% of all expressions, and in the upper or lower face only.
Porter
Stephen
S
Department of Psychology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada. sbporter@dal.ca
ten Brinke
Leanne
L
D000328:Adult; D001767:Blinking / Q000502:physiology; D008192:Deception; D004644:Emotions / Q000502:physiology*; D005149:Facial Expression; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment / Q000502:physiology; D008297:Male; D009633:Nonverbal Communication / Q000502:physiology / Q000523:psychology; D015588:Observer Variation; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology; D014473:Unconscious, Psychology; D014743:Videotape Recording