Development and validation of the counterfactual thinking for negative events scale.
We examined the psychometric properties of the newly created Counterfactual Thinking for Negative Events Scale (CTNES) in two studies involving university undergraduates. In Study 1 (N = 634), factor analysis revealed four subscales that correspond with various types of counterfactual thinking: Nonreferent Downward, Other-Referent Upward, Self-Referent Upward, and Nonreferent Upward. The subscales were largely orthogonal and had adequate internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The CTNES subscales were positively correlated with a traditional method of assessing counterfactual thinking and were related as expected to contextual aspects of the negative event, negative affect, and cognitive style. In Study 2 (N = 208), we further examined the validity of the scale and demonstrated that the subscales were sensitive to an experimental manipulation concerning the type of negative event participants recalled. Moreover, the CTNES subscales correlated in the expected direction with measures of coping and cognitive style.
Rye
Mark S
MS
Department of Psychology, University of Dayton, Dayton, OH 45469-1430, USA. Mark.Rye@notes.udayton.edu
Cahoon
Melissa B
MB
Ali
Rahan S
RS
Daftary
Tarika
T
D000223:Adaptation, Psychological; D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000339:Affect; D003071:Cognition; D005163:Factor Analysis, Statistical; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008016:Life Change Events; D008297:Male; D010555:Personality Inventory; D011594:Psychometrics; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014481:United States