title: Priorities for hydrocephalus research: report from a National Institutes of Health-sponsored workshop.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Treatment for hydrocephalus has not advanced appreciably since the advent of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunts more than 50 years ago. Many questions remain that clinical and basic research could address, which in turn could improve therapeutic options. To clarify the main issues facing hydrocephalus research and to identify critical advances necessary to improve outcomes for patients with hydrocephalus, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) sponsored a workshop titled "Hydrocephalus: Myths, New Facts, and Clear Directions." The purpose of this paper is to report on the recommendations that resulted from that workshop.
  
  
  METHODS
  The workshop convened from September 29 to October 1, 2005, in Bethesda, Maryland. Among the 150 attendees was an international group of participants, including experts in pediatric and adult hydrocephalus as well as scientists working in related fields, neurosurgeons, laboratory-based neuroscientists, neurologists, patient advocates, individuals with hydrocephalus, parents, and NIH program and intramural staff. Plenary and breakout sessions covered injury and recovery mechanisms, modeling, biomechanics, diagnosis, current treatment and outcomes, complications, quality of life, future treatments, medical devices, development of research networks and information sharing, and education and career development.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The conclusions were as follows: 1) current methods of diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes monitoring need improvement; 2) frequent complications, poor rate of shunt survival, and poor quality of life for patients lead to unsatisfactory outcomes; 3) investigators and caregivers need additional methods to monitor neurocognitive function and control of CSF variables such as pressure, flow, or pulsatility; 4) research warrants novel interdisciplinary approaches; 5) understanding of the pathophysiological and recovery mechanisms of neuronal function in hydrocephalus is poor, warranting further investigation; and 6) both basic and clinical aspects warrant expanded and innovative training programs.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The research priorities of this workshop provide critical guidance for future research in hydrocephalus, which should result in advances in knowledge, and ultimately in the treatment for this important disorder and improved outcomes in patients of all ages.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
authors.forename: Michael A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Williams
authors.forename: James P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: McAllister
authors.forename: Marion L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Walker
authors.forename: Dory A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Kranz
authors.forename: Marvin
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Bergsneider
authors.forename: Marc R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Del Bigio
authors.forename: Laurel
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Fleming
authors.forename: David M
authors.initials: DM
authors.lastname: Frim
authors.forename: Katrina
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Gwinn
authors.forename: John R W
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Kestle
authors.forename: Mark G
authors.initials: MG
authors.lastname: Luciano
authors.forename: Joseph R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Madsen
authors.forename: Mary Lou
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Oster-Granite
authors.forename: Giovanna
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Spinella
mesh_terms: D035843:Biomedical Research; D006292:Health Priorities; D006801:Humans; D006849:Hydrocephalus / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000209:etiology / Q000628:therapy