Language-based access to gestural components of conceptual knowledge.
We report two experiments in which production of articulated hand gestures was used to reveal the nature of gestural knowledge evoked by sentences referring to manipulable objects. Two gesture types were examined: functional gestures (executed when using an object for its intended purpose) and volumetric gestures (used when picking up an object simply to move it). Participants read aloud a sentence that referred to an object but did not mention any form of manual interaction (e.g., Jane forgot the calculator) and were cued after a delay of 300 or 750 ms to produce the functional or volumetric gesture associated with the object, or a gesture that was unrelated to the object. At both cue delays, functional gestures were primed relative to unrelated gestures, but no significant priming was found for volumetric gestures. Our findings elucidate the types of motor representations that are directly linked to the meaning of words referring to manipulable objects in sentences.
Masson
Michael E J
ME
Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada. mmasson@uvic.ca
Bub
Daniel N
DN
Newton-Taylor
Meaghan
M
D032882:Comprehension; D003210:Concept Formation; D005868:Gestures; D018737:Hand Strength; D006801:Humans; D033182:Intention; D009039:Motion Perception; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011930:Reaction Time; D012660:Semantics; D013067:Speech Perception