title: EORTC 22972-26991/MRC BR10 trial: fractionated stereotactic boost following conventional radiotherapy of high grade gliomas. Clinical and quality-assurance results of the stereotactic boost arm.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The EORTC trial No. 22972 investigated the role of an additional fractionated stereotactic boost (fSRT) to conventional radiotherapy for patients with high grade gliomas. A quality-assurance (QA) programme was run in conjunction with the study and was the first within the EORTC addressing the quality of a supposedly highly accurate treatment technique such as stereotactic radiotherapy. A second aim was to investigate a possible relation between the clinical results of the stereotactic boost arm and the results of the QA.
  
  
  METHODS
  The trial was closed in 2001 due to low accrual. In total, 25 patients were randomized: 14 into the experimental arm and 11 into the control arm. Six centres randomized patients, 8 centres had completed the dummy run (DR) for the stereotactic boost part. All participating centres (9) were asked to complete a quality-assurance questionnaire. The DR consisted of treatment planning according to the guidelines of the protocol on 3 different tumour volumes drawn on CT images of a humanized phantom. The SRT technique to be used was evaluated by the questionnaire. Clinical data from patients recruited to the boost arm from 6 participating centres were analysed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There was a full compliance to the protocol requirements for 5 centres. Major and minor deviations in conformality were observed for 2 and 3 centres, respectively. Of the 8 centres which completed the DR, one centre did not comply with the requirements of stereotactic radiotherapy concerning accuracy, dosimetry and planning. Median follow-up and median overall survival were 39.2 and 21.4 months, respectively. Acute and late toxicities of the stereotactic boost were low. One radiation necrosis was seen for a patient who has not received the SRT boost. Three reported serious adverse events were all seizures and probably therapy-related.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Overall compliance was good but not ideal from the point of view of this highly precise radiation technique. Survival in the subgroup of patients with small volume disease was encouraging, but the study does not provide sufficient information about the potential value of fSRT boost in patients with malignant glioma.Toxicity due to an additional stereotactic boost of 20 Gy in 4 fractions was low and may be considered as a safe treatment option for patients with small tumours.
authors.affiliation: Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland. brigitta.baumert@maastro.nl
authors.forename: Brigitta G
authors.initials: BG
authors.lastname: Baumert
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Brada
authors.forename: Jacques
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Bernier
authors.forename: Rolf D
authors.initials: RD
authors.lastname: Kortmann
authors.forename: Cary
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Dehing-Oberije
authors.forename: Laurence
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Collette
authors.forename: J Bernard
authors.initials: JB
authors.lastname: Davis
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001932:Brain Neoplasms / Q000532:radiotherapy*; D016371:Cranial Irradiation / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D019583:Dose Fractionation, Radiation; D005260:Female; D005910:Glioma / Q000532:radiotherapy*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D013238:Stereotaxic Techniques; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D016019:Survival Analysis; D016896:Treatment Outcome