title: Polyflex expandable stents in the treatment of esophageal disease: initial experience.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The new generation of expandable plastic esophageal stents (Polyflex; Boston Scientific, Natick, MA), combine the features of plastic and self-expanding metallic stents. The main objective of this study is to evaluate our initial experience with Polyflex expandable stents in the treatment of esophageal disease from two institutions.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 58 Polyflex stents were placed in 38 patients over a two-year period. There were 24 men and 14 women, with a median age of 63 years (range, 25 to 83). The most common indication for placement was an esophageal stricture in 25 patients (66%); other causes included leak in 8 (21%) and tracheoesophageal fistula (TEF) in 5 (13%). We evaluated the hospital course, complications, and outcomes.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The median postoperative stay was one day. Complications included migration in 38 stents (63%) (28 patients; 73%), retrosternal chest discomfort in nine, reflux in four, airway obstruction in one, and food impaction in three. Continued leak or a persistent TEF occurred in five patients (38%). Reintervention was required predominantly due to migration of the stent at a mean interval of 46 days (range, 1 to 353). Patients with dysphagia improved significantly with dysphagia scores (1 = no dysphagia; 5 = unable to swallow saliva) improving from 3.44 to 2.15 (p < 0.0001).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Polyflex stents were effective in the relief of dysphagia due to strictures. They were less effective in esophageal perforations or leaks. Their primary disadvantage is a high migration rate and further improvements in design are required to decrease this high incidence of migration.
authors.affiliation: Heart, Lung, and Esophageal Surgery Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.
authors.forename: Arjun
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Pennathur
authors.forename: Andrew C
authors.initials: AC
authors.lastname: Chang
authors.forename: Kevin M
authors.initials: KM
authors.lastname: McGrath
authors.forename: Gregory
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Steiner
authors.forename: Miguel
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Alvelo-Rivera
authors.forename: Omar
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Awais
authors.forename: William E
authors.initials: WE
authors.lastname: Gooding
authors.forename: Neil A
authors.initials: NA
authors.lastname: Christie
authors.forename: Sebastien
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Gilbert
authors.forename: Rodney J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Landreneau
authors.forename: James D
authors.initials: JD
authors.lastname: Luketich
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D004937:Esophageal Fistula / Q000601:surgery*; D004938:Esophageal Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D004940:Esophageal Stenosis / Q000601:surgery*; D005260:Female; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D020959:Polyethylene; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology; D011474:Prosthesis Design; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D019919:Prosthesis Implantation; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012826:Silicone Elastomers; D015607:Stents; D014138:Tracheoesophageal Fistula / Q000601:surgery*; D016896:Treatment Outcome
chemical_list: D012826:Silicone Elastomers; D020959:Polyethylene