title: Naso-temporal asymmetry for signals invisible to the retinotectal pathway.
abstract: Monocular viewing conditions show an asymmetry between stimuli presented in the temporal and nasal visual fields in their efficiency for automatically triggering eye saccades and grasping attention. For instance, observers free to make a saccade to one of two stimuli presented together orient preferentially to the temporal stimulus. Such naso-temporal asymmetry (NTA) has been assumed to reflect the asymmetry in the retinotectal pathway to the superior colliculus. We tested this hypothesis using S cone stimuli, which are invisible to the magnocellular and retinotectal pathways. The observed NTA in choice saccades to bilateral stimuli was no less present for S cone stimuli than for luminance stimuli. Additionally, the amplitude of the NTA can be enhanced when S cone signals are added to luminance signals. These results suggest that behavioral NTA in humans is not diagnostic of retinotectal mediation. Furthermore, we found no asymmetries in latency, suggesting that the NTA in saccade choice does not originate simply from a bottom-up asymmetry in any low level visual pathways.
authors.affiliation: School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom. bompasa@cardiff.ac.uk
authors.forename: Aline
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Bompas
authors.forename: Thomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Sterling
authors.forename: Robert D
authors.initials: RD
authors.lastname: Rafal
authors.forename: Petroc
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Sumner
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention; D007839:Functional Laterality; D006801:Humans; D009666:Nose; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D011601:Psychophysics; D012160:Retina / Q000502:physiology*; D012438:Saccades; D013477:Superior Colliculi / Q000502:physiology*; D014785:Vision, Ocular / Q000502:physiology*; D014794:Visual Fields; D014795:Visual Pathways / Q000502:physiology