How repeatable is adaptive evolution? The role of geographical origin and founder effects in laboratory adaptation.
The importance of contingency versus predictability in evolution has been a long-standing issue, particularly the interaction between genetic background, founder effects, and selection. Here we address experimentally the effects of genetic background and founder events on the repeatability of laboratory adaptation in Drosophila subobscura populations for several functional traits. We found disparate starting points for adaptation among laboratory populations derived from independently sampled wild populations for all traits. With respect to the subsequent evolutionary rate during laboratory adaptation, starvation resistance varied considerably among foundations such that the outcome of laboratory evolution is rather unpredictable for this particular trait, even in direction. In contrast, the laboratory evolution of traits closely related to fitness was less contingent on the circumstances of foundation. These findings suggest that the initial laboratory evolution of weakly selected characters may be unpredictable, even when the key adaptations under evolutionary domestication are predictable with respect to their trajectories.
Simões
Pedro
P
Centro de Biologia Ambiental, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Faculdade de Ciências da Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal. pmsimoes@fc.ul.pt
Santos
Josiane
J
Fragata
Inês
I
Mueller
Laurence D
LD
Rose
Michael R
MR
Matos
Margarida
M
D000220:Adaptation, Biological; D000818:Animals; D005075:Biological Evolution; D004330:Drosophila / Q000235:genetics; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D018703:Founder Effect; D005843:Geography; D008954:Models, Biological; D008957:Models, Genetic; D015233:Models, Statistical; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D010641:Phenotype; D015203:Reproducibility of Results