title: The motor theory of speech perception revisited.
abstract: Galantucci, Fowler, and Turvey (2006) have claimed that perceiving speech is perceiving gestures and that the motor system is recruited for perceiving speech. We make the counter argument that perceiving speech is not perceiving gestures, that the motor system is not recruitedfor perceiving speech, and that speech perception can be adequately described by a prototypical pattern recognition model, the fuzzy logical model of perception (FLMP). Empirical evidence taken as support for gesture and motor theory is reconsidered in more detail and in the framework of the FLMR Additional theoretical and logical arguments are made to challenge gesture and motor theory.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, California 95064, USA. massaro@fuzzy.ucsc.edu
authors.forename: Dominic W
authors.initials: DW
authors.lastname: Massaro
authors.forename: Trevor H
authors.initials: TH
authors.lastname: Chen
mesh_terms: D005868:Gestures; D006801:Humans; D009039:Motion Perception; D011582:Psychological Theory; D013067:Speech Perception; D014796:Visual Perception