Framing effects in group investment decision making: role of group polarization.
Prospect theory proposes that framing effects result in a preference for risk-averse choices in gain situations and risk-seeking choices in loss situations. However, in group polarization situations, groups show a pronounced tendency to shift toward more extreme positions than those they initially held. Whether framing effects in group decision making are more prominent as a result of the group-polarization effect was examined. Purposive sampling of 120 college students (57 men, 63 women; M age = 20.1 yr., SD = 0.9) allowed assessment of relative preference between cautious and risky choices in individual and group decisions. Findings indicated that both group polarization and framing effects occur in investment decisions. More importantly, group decisions in a gain situation appear to be more cautious, i.e., risk averse, than individual decisions, whereas group decisions in the loss situation appear to be more risky than individual decisions. Thus, group decision making may expand framing effects when it comes to investment choices through group polarization.
Cheng
Pi-Yueh
PY
Department of Finance, Tainan University of Technology, Tainan.
Chiou
Wen-Bin
WB
D000328:Adult; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D006126:Group Processes; D006801:Humans; D007449:Investments; D008297:Male; D012309:Risk-Taking