Role of housing modalities on management and surveillance strategies for adventitious agents of rodents.
Specific pathogen-free (SPF) rodents for modern biomedical research need to be free of pathogens and other infectious agents that may not produce disease but nevertheless cause research interference. To meet this need, rodents have been rederived to eliminate adventitious agents and then housed in room- to cage-level barrier systems to exclude microbial contaminants. Because barriers can and do fail, routine health monitoring (HM) is necessary to verify the SPF status of colonies. Testing without strict adherence to biosecurity practices, however, can lead to the inadvertent transfer of unrecognized, inapparent agents among institutions and colonies. Microisolation caging systems have become popular for housing SPF rodents because they are versatile and provide a highly effective cage-level barrier to the entry and spread of adventitious agents. But when a microisolation-caged colony is contaminated, the cage-level barrier impedes the spread of infection and so the prevalence of infection is often low, which increases the chance of missing a contamination and complicates the corroboration of unexpected positive findings. The expanding production of genetically engineered mutant (GEM) rodent strains at research institutions, where biosecurity practices vary and the risk of microbial contamination can be high, underscores the importance of accurate HM results in mitigating the risk of the introduction and spread of microbial contaminants with the exchange of mutant rodent strains among investigators and institutions.
Shek
William R
WR
Charles River Laboratories, 251 Ballardvale Street, Wilmington, MA 01887, USA. William.Shek@crl.com
D000818:Animals; D000830:Animals, Laboratory; D004780:Environment, Controlled; D006799:Housing, Animal / Q000592:standards*; D017053:Infection Control / Q000379:methods*; D051379:Mice; D051381:Rats; D012376:Rodent Diseases / Q000517:prevention & control*