GIS, modeling, and politics: on the tensions of collaborative decision support.
A tension exists at the heart of efforts to support collaboration with GIS. Many scholars and practitioners seek to support two separate objectives: (1) problem solving and (2) the exploration of diverse problem understandings. GIS applications designed for problem solving often pre-define the problem space by structuring the kind of information that can be considered or the way in which the problem is conceptualized. In doing so, they necessarily privilege particular perspectives and understandings of the problem while marginalizing others. As a result, these initiatives undermine their second objective. This is problematic in the context of contentious environmental decisions which have broad-reaching impacts on people with diverse perspectives and interests. In such contexts, I argue that equitable collaboration is impossible without first emphasizing the exploration of diverse problem understandings. I support this argument theoretically by turning to the literatures on collaborative planning and spatial decision support, and empirically in my analysis of a case study of an effort to construct a GIS for supporting collaborative water resource management in rural Idaho. Reflecting upon the case, I provide a set of recommendations to those seeking to better negotiate the tensions of supporting collaboration with GIS in the context of contentious environmental and natural resource decisions.
Kevin
K
Ramsey
D003256:Community Participation; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000379:methods*; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D003657:Decision Making; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D034462:Dissent and Disputes; D040362:Geographic Information Systems; D006801:Humans; D007061:Idaho; D011340:Problem Solving; D011640:Public Policy; D014881:Water Supply / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence