Revision patellofemoral arthroplasty: three- to seven-year follow-up.
In this series, a failed first-generation patellofemoral arthroplasty was revised to a second-generation prosthesis. Fourteen knees were prospectively followed up for a mean of 60 months. Primary procedure failure was due to component malposition, subluxation, polyethylene wear, or overstuffing. Mean Bristol knee scores improved from 58 (range, 36-86) to 79 (range, 38-100) (P < .001). Mild femorotibial arthritis (Ahlbach stage I) was present in 5 knees and predicted a poorer outcome. At most recent follow-up, there was no evidence of wear, loosening, or subluxation. Significant improvement can be obtained when revising the failed patellofemoral arthroplasty, provided there is no femorotibial arthritis.
Hendrix
Michiel R G
MR
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stirling Royal Infirmary, Stirling, UK.
Ackroyd
Christopher E
CE
Lonner
Jess H
JH
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D019645:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee / Q000009:adverse effects*; D005260:Female; D005269:Femur / Q000601:surgery; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010329:Patella / Q000601:surgery; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D012086:Reoperation