Focus, prosodic context, and phonological feature specification: patterns of variation in fricative production.
Because they consist, in large part, of random turbulent noise, fricatives present a challenge to attempts to specify the phonetic correlates of phonological features. Previous research has focused on temporal properties, acoustic power, and a variety of spectral properties of fricatives in a number of contexts [Jongman et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108, 1252-1263 (2000); Jesus and Shadle, J. Phonet. 30, 437-467 (2002); Crystal and House, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 83, 1553-1573 (1988a)]. However, no systematic investigation of the effects of focus and prosodic context on fricative production has been carried out. Manipulation of explicit focus can serve to selectively exaggerate linguistically relevant properties of speech in much the same manner as stress [de Jong, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 97, 491-504 (1995); de Jong, J. Phonet. 32, 493-516 (2004); de Jong and Zawaydeh, J. Phonet. 30, 53-75 (2002)]. This experimental technique was exploited to investigate acoustic power along with temporal and spectral characteristics of American English fricatives in two prosodic contexts, to probe whether native speakers selectively attend to subsegmental features, and to consider variability in fricative production across speakers. While focus in general increased noise power and duration, speakers did not selectively enhance spectral features of the target fricatives.
Department of Linguistics, Indiana University, Memorial Hall, Room 322, 1021 E. Third Street, Bloomington, Indiana 47405, USA. nosilber@indiana.edu
Noah
N
Silbert
Kenneth
K
de Jong
D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D009043:Motor Activity; D010700:Phonetics; D013018:Sound Spectrography; D013060:Speech; D013061:Speech Acoustics; D013062:Speech Articulation Tests; D013067:Speech Perception