[Sensitivity of size I stimulus in achromatic automated perimetry for detection of glaucomatous visual field defects: a comparative analysis with short wavelength automated perimetry and standard automated perimetry (SITA)].
OBJECTIVE
To compare sensitivity and specificity of achromatic perimetry with size I stimulus (WW-I) with standard automated perimetry (SITA strategy) and blue on yellow perimetry (SWAP) for early diagnosis of glaucoma.


METHODS
Seventy-three eyes of 73 suspects, glaucomatous and normal subjects underwent automated perimetry with SITA 24-2, WW-I and SWAP. After application of specific criteria of abnormality, sensitivity, specificity, and the area under ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) curve were calculated for each of the examinations. The areas under the ROC curve were compared pair-wisely with the univariable Z test and significance set at 5%.


RESULTS
WW-I displayed the greatest sensitivity (100%) and the lowest specificity (75.7%). SWAP revealed less sensitivity (69.4%); specificity, however, was higher (89.2%). Pairwise comparison of ROC curves showed no difference.


CONCLUSIONS
WW-I revealed good sensitivity for the detection of early glaucomatous visual field defects. This technique adds to the available armamentarium for early functional diagnosis of glaucomatous optic neuropathy.
Mattos
Tessa de Cerqueira Lemos
Tde C
Departamento de Oftalmologia, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil.
Kasahara
Niro
N
Della Paolera
Maurício
M
Cohen
Ralph
R
Mandia Junior
Carmo
C
Almeida
Geraldo Vicente de
GV
D000328:Adult; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D042241:Early Diagnosis; D005260:Female; D005901:Glaucoma / Q000175:diagnosis*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D012372:ROC Curve; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D058609:Visual Field Tests / Q000379:methods*; D014794:Visual Fields