Ethics issues experienced in HBM within Portuguese health surveillance and research projects.
BACKGROUND
In keeping with the fundamental practice of transparency in the discussion and resolution of ethics conflicts raised by research, a summary of ethics issues raised during Portuguese biomonitoring in health surveillance and research is presented and, where applicable, their resolution is described.


METHODS
Projects underway aim to promote the surveillance of public health related to the presence of solid waste incinerators or to study associations between human exposure to environmental factors and adverse health effects. The methodological approach involves biomonitoring of heavy metals, dioxins and/or other persistent organic pollutants in tissues including blood, human milk and both scalp and pubic hair in groups such as the general population, children, pregnant women or women attempting pregnancy. As such, the projects entail the recruitment of individuals representing different demographic and health conditions, the collection of body tissues and personal data, and the processing of the data and results.


RESULTS
The issue of autonomy is raised during the recruitment of participants and during the collection of samples and data. This right is protected by the requirement for prior written, informed consent from the participant or, in the case of children, from their guardian. Recruitment has been successful, among eligible participants, in spite of incentives rarely being offered. The exception has been in obtaining guardians' consent for children's participation, particularly for blood sampling. In an attempt to mitigate the harm-benefit ratio, current research efforts include alternative less invasive biomarkers.Surveys are currently being conducted under contract as independent biomonitoring actions and as such, must be explicitly disclosed as a potential conflict of interests. Communication of results to participants is in general only practised when a health issue is present and corrective action possible. Concerning human milk a careful approach is taken, considering breast-feeding's proven benefits.


CONCLUSIONS
No national legislation currently accounts for the surveillance component of biomonitoring as distinct from research. Ethics issues arising within the domain of research are resolved according to available regulations. For issues encountered during surveillance, the same principles are used as guidance, completed by the authors' best judgement and relevant ethics committees' findings.
Reis
M Fátima
MF
Institute of Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Av, Prof, Egas Moniz, 1649-028 Lisbon, Portugal. mfreis@fm.ul.pt
Segurado
Susana
S
Brantes
Ana
A
Simões
Helena Teresinha
HT
Melim
J Maurício
JM
Geraldes
V
V
Miguel
J Pereira
JP
D026686:Beneficence; D016494:Computer Security; D016265:Conflict of Interest; D004784:Environmental Monitoring / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D004785:Environmental Pollutants / Q000032:analysis; D028744:Ethics Committees, Research; D032984:Ethics, Research; D006306:Health Surveys; D006805:Human Experimentation / Q000941:ethics*; D006801:Humans; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D011174:Portugal
D004785:Environmental Pollutants