Speech detection in spatial and nonspatial speech maskers.
The effect of perceived spatial differences on masking release was examined using a 4AFC speech detection paradigm. Targets were 20 words produced by a female talker. Maskers were recordings of continuous streams of nonsense sentences spoken by two female talkers and mixed into each of two channels (two talker, and the same masker time reversed). Two masker spatial conditions were employed: "RF" with a 4 ms time lead to the loudspeaker 60 degrees horizontally to the right, and "FR" with the time lead to the front (0 degrees ) loudspeaker. The reference nonspatial "F" masker was presented from the front loudspeaker only. Target presentation was always from the front loudspeaker. In Experiment 1, target detection threshold for both natural and time-reversed spatial maskers was 17-20 dB lower than that for the nonspatial masker, suggesting that significant release from informational masking occurs with spatial speech maskers regardless of masker understandability. In Experiment 2, the effectiveness of the FR and RF maskers was evaluated as the right loudspeaker output was attenuated until the two-source maskers were indistinguishable from the F masker, as measured independently in a discrimination task. Results indicated that spatial release from masking can be observed with barely noticeable target-masker spatial differences.
Department of Communication Disorders, University of Massachusetts, 358 N. Pleasant Street, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA. umab@vermontel.net
Uma
U
Balakrishnan
Richard L
RL
Freyman
D001309:Auditory Threshold / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D009622:Noise; D010470:Perceptual Masking; D012984:Software; D013017:Sound Localization; D013018:Sound Spectrography; D013028:Space Perception; D013060:Speech; D013063:Speech Discrimination Tests; D013067:Speech Perception