Effects of social value orientations on fairness judgments.
The authors assessed the impact that social value orientations--prosocial (i.e., concerned about outcomes for both oneself and others) versus proself (i.e., concerned about one's own outcome only)--had on fairness judgments in a non-negotiation setting. The results indicated that prosocials generally formed fairness judgments in a manner suggested by equity theory: Given the same input as a comparison other, they saw an equal outcome as fairer than a favorable or unfavorable outcome. The fairness determinations of proselfs, however, tended to follow the tenets of self-interest theory: Given the same input as a comparison other, they saw a favorable outcome as fairer than an unfavorable outcome. Contrary to self-interest theory, proselfs did not find a favorable outcome fairer than an equal outcome. These findings indicate that social value orientations differentially affect the evaluation of outcome information in the formation of fairness judgments.
Central Methodist University, Park Hills, MO, USA. andersonwi@umsl.edu
William D
WD
Anderson
Miles L
ML
Patterson
D000533:Altruism; D003469:Culture; D003674:Defense Mechanisms; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D007600:Judgment; D009042:Motivation; D018187:Personal Construct Theory; D012935:Social Justice; D012945:Social Values; D013334:Students / Q000523:psychology; D035502:Trust