Mad cows and computer models: the U.S. response to BSE.
The proportion of slaughtered cattle tested for BSE is much smaller in the U.S. than in Europe and Japan, leaving the U.S. heavily dependent on statistical models to estimate both the current prevalence and the spread of BSE. We examine the models relied on by USDA, finding that the prevalence model provides only a rough estimate, due to limited data availability. Reassuring forecasts from the model of the spread of BSE depend on the arbitrary constraint that worst-case values are assumed by only one of 17 key parameters at a time. In three of the six published scenarios with multiple worst-case parameter values, there is at least a 25% probability that BSE will spread rapidly. In public policy terms, reliance on potentially flawed models can be seen as a gamble that no serious BSE outbreak will occur. Statistical modeling at this level of abstraction, with its myriad, compound uncertainties, is no substitute for precautionary policies to protect public health against the threat of epidemics such as BSE.
Tufts University Medford, GDAE 44 Teele Ave., MA 02155, USA. Frank.Ackerman@tufts.edu
Frank
F
Ackerman
Wendy A
WA
Johnecheck
D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle; D003198:Computer Simulation; D003257:Consumer Product Safety; D007562:Creutzfeldt-Jakob Syndrome / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control; D016643:Encephalopathy, Bovine Spongiform / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000635:transmission; D006291:Health Policy; D006801:Humans; D008460:Meat; D015233:Models, Statistical; D009010:Monte Carlo Method; D015995:Prevalence; D014481:United States / Q000453:epidemiology; D015047:Zoonoses / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000635:transmission