Troxler effect with dichoptic stimulus presentations: evidence for binocular inhibitory summation and interocular suppression.
Whether the Troxler effect (TE) has to do with interocular suppression and/or summation was studied with dichoptically matched (binocular or dioptic) and unmatched (monocular) stimulus presentations. Perceptual disappearance was found to occur more slowly under the binocular condition (mean=14.2s) than the monocular condition (mean=8.4s), but much faster than predicted by probability summation of the experimentally obtained latencies and durations of the TE in the monocular conditions (>27 s), suggesting a binocular inhibitory summation, the opposite of the binocular summation found with detection and contrast matching tasks [(Blake, R., & Fox, R. (1973). The psychological inquiry into binocular summation. Perception and Psychophysics, 14, 161-185; Blake, R., Sloane, M., & Fox, R. (1981). Further developments in binocular summation. Perception &Psychophysics 30, 266-276.)]. In addition, Ss with poorer stereoacuity took longer to see the disappearance in the monocular condition, and showed a larger disparity between the TEs from the two monocular conditions, suggesting a contribution of interocular suppression to the TE.
Lou
Liang
L
Department of Psychology, Grand Valley State University, Allendale, MI 49401, USA. loul@gvsu.edu <loul@gvsu.edu>
D000328:Adult; D003867:Depth Perception / Q000502:physiology; D023882:Dominance, Ocular / Q000502:physiology; D005403:Fixation, Ocular / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D011601:Psychophysics; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D015357:Vision Disparity / Q000502:physiology*; D015348:Vision, Binocular / Q000502:physiology*; D015349:Vision, Monocular / Q000502:physiology; D014792:Visual Acuity / Q000502:physiology