CB(1) cannabinoid receptor activation dose dependently modulates neuronal activity within caudal but not rostral song control regions of adult zebra finch telencephalon.
BACKGROUND
CB(1) cannabinoid receptors are distinctly expressed at high density within several regions of zebra finch telencephalon, including those known to be involved in song learning (lMAN and Area X) and production (HVC and RA) because (1) exposure to cannabinoid agonists during developmental periods of auditory and sensory-motor song learning alters song patterns produced later in adulthood and (2) densities of song region expression of CB(1) waxes and wanes during song learning. It is becoming clear that CB(1)-receptor-mediated signaling is important to normal processes of vocal development.


METHODS
To better understand the mechanisms involved in cannabinoid modulation of vocal behavior, we have investigated the dose-response relationship between systemic cannabinoid exposure and changes in neuronal activity (as indicated by expression of the transcription factor, c-Fos) within telencephalic brain regions, with established involvement in song learning and/or control.


RESULTS
In adults, we have found that low doses (0.1 mg/kg) of the cannabinoid agonist WIN-55212-2 decrease neuronal activity (as indicated by densities of c-fos-expressing nuclei) within vocal motor regions of caudal telencephalon (HVC and RA) while higher doses (3 mg/kg) stimulate activity. Both effects were reversed by pretreatment with the CB(1)-selective antagonist rimonabant. Interestingly, no effects of cannabinoid treatment were observed within the rostral song regions lMAN and Area X, despite distinct and dense CB(1) receptor expression within these areas.


CONCLUSIONS
Overall, our results demonstrate that, depending on dosage, CB(1) agonism can both inhibit and stimulate neuronal activity within brain regions controlling adult vocal motor output, implicating involvement of multiple CB(1)-sensitive neuronal circuits.
Soderstrom
Ken
K
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Brody School of Medicine, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27834, USA. soderstromk@ecu.edu
Tian
Qiyu
Q
D000818:Animals; D048588:Benzoxazines / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000494:pharmacology; D004305:Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; D046369:Finches / Q000502:physiology*; D007150:Immunohistochemistry; D008297:Male; D009025:Morpholines / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000494:pharmacology; D009043:Motor Activity / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology; D009281:Naphthalenes / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000494:pharmacology; D010880:Piperidines / Q000494:pharmacology; D016760:Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos / Q000378:metabolism; D011720:Pyrazoles / Q000494:pharmacology; D043884:Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1 / Q000819:agonists*; D000077285:Rimonabant; D013687:Telencephalon / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology*; D014828:Vocalization, Animal / Q000187:drug effects*
D048588:Benzoxazines; D009025:Morpholines; D009281:Naphthalenes; D010880:Piperidines; D016760:Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos; D011720:Pyrazoles; D043884:Receptor, Cannabinoid, CB1; C070417:(3R)-((2,3-dihydro-5-methyl-3-((4-morpholinyl)methyl)pyrrolo-(1,2,3-de)-1,4-benzoxazin-6-yl)(1-naphthalenyl))methanone; D000077285:Rimonabant