Videoconferencing and forensic mental health in Australia.
Videoconferencing is in common use in Australian forensic mental health services. It provides opportunities to link remote prisons, courts, and psychiatric clinics with distant specialist services, and enables a range of activities including assessment, treatment and feedback, expert testimony, education, and inter-service planning. These functions are acceptable to patients and clinicians, and in Australia videoconferencing minimizes disruption to small services and their patients, who might otherwise face lengthy journeys. In particular, marginalized patient groups, including indigenous people and prisoners, may receive better services. The evidence base supports use of videoconferencing despite a number of practical, legal, and clinical issues that may reduce its effectiveness compared with face-to-face assessments. Videoconferencing technologies are critical to effective forensic mental health services in Australia.
Sullivan
Danny H
DH
Department of Psychology, Psychiatry and Psychological Medicine, Victoria 3078, Australia. danny.sullivan@forensicare.vic.gov.au
Chapman
Murray
M
Mullen
Paul E
PE
D001315:Australia; D003134:Commitment of Persons with Psychiatric Disorders / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D005104:Expert Testimony / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D005555:Forensic Psychiatry / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D006801:Humans; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000628:therapy; D008605:Mental Health Services / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D044382:Population Groups / Q000523:psychology*; D011329:Prisoners / Q000523:psychology*; D019114:Remote Consultation / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D049269:Videoconferencing / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000458:organization & administration