A unilateral field advantage for detecting repeated elements.
Previous studies have shown that letter repetitions are detected more rapidly when presented bilaterally (one letter in each visual field) than when presented unilaterally (both in the same field) when subjects have to report matches independently of case or font (e.g., Aa). This pattern of results is referred to as a bilateral field advantage. Here, we present evidence of an opposite pattern of results for detecting repeated items when they are physically identical. In our repetition detection paradigm, subjects indicated whether there was a repetition of any two of four presented items, one in each quadrant of the visual field. Stimulus classes tested included letters, color, size, orientation, and motion paths. The subjects were significantly faster at detecting unilateral versus bilateral repetitions for four out of the five stimuli classes tested, with a trend in the same direction for the fifth. This unilateral field advantage suggests that low-level processes group physically identical items more efficiently within hemifields than across.
Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. sbutcher@andrew.cmu.edu
Serena Jenelle
SJ
Butcher
Patrick
P
Cavanagh
D006801:Humans; D010507:Periodicity; D011930:Reaction Time; D017603:Signal Detection, Psychological; D015349:Vision, Monocular / Q000502:physiology*; D014794:Visual Fields