Premilking teat preparation for Australian pasture-based cows milked by an automated milking system.
Economic viability of automatic milking systems (AMS) within an Australian pasture-based farming system will be largely determined by the throughput (cows milked/h), which is the result of processes occurring while the cow is in the AMS milking crate. Premilking udder preparation is automated and optional on all AMS. Yet, very few conventional farms in Australia conduct premilking teat preparation regimens, with the majority (78%) strategically washing only visibly dirty teats before milking cup attachment. The objective was to determine the impact of udder preparation in an AMS on the total time spent by cows in the AMS milking unit (crate time). An experiment was conducted with 80 lactating Holstein-Friesian cows in a crossover design over two 5-wk periods to determine the effect of premilking teat preparation (no wash vs. wash) on milk yield, milk harvest rates, and total crate time per milking session in an AMS. Within this study there was no significant effect of treatment on quarter milk conductivity (no wash = 4,858 vs. wash = 4,829 +/- SE = 17 microS/cm), milk blood concentration (no wash = 115.7 vs. wash = 112.3 +/- 7.3 ppm) or test-day somatic cell counts (no wash = 2.044 vs. wash = 2.039 +/- 0.025 log(10) SCC). There was similar total daily milk yield for the 2 treatments (no wash = 20.5 vs. wash = 20.1 +/- 0.2 kg of milk), but a greater mean quarter milk flow rate resulting from the wash treatment (no wash = 0.950 vs. wash = 0.981 +/- 0.013 kg of milk/min). The faster milking was not sufficient to counter the time associated with washing, resulting in longer crate time (no wash = 6.02 vs. wash = 7.12 +/- 0.08 min/milking session) and therefore, lower harvest rate (no wash = 2.08 vs. wash = 1.74 +/- 0.02 kg of milk/min crate time). Not washing teats would allow more efficient AMS utilization by potentially allowing more cows to be milked per machine, which would likely have a positive effect on the economic viability of this technology. The results indicate that a longer term study, investigating the effect of washing teats on udder health and milk quality, is warranted.
Davis
K L
KL
University of Sydney, Camden, NSW 2570, Australia. kendrad@usyd.edu.au
Fulkerson
W J
WJ
Garcia
S C
SC
Dickeson
D
D
Barchia
I M
IM
D000818:Animals; D001331:Automation; D002417:Cattle / Q000502:physiology*; D002452:Cell Count / Q000662:veterinary; D018592:Cross-Over Studies; D003612:Dairying / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D006920:Hygiene; D007774:Lactation; D008321:Mammary Glands, Animal / Q000502:physiology*; D008892:Milk / Q000166:cytology / Q000378:metabolism*; D006109:Poaceae; D013997:Time Factors