Factors impacting equine sperm recovery rate and quality following cushioned centrifugation.
Two experiments were conducted to investigate modifications in cushioned centrifugation of stallion semen. Specifically, the effects of tube type, centrifugation medium, cushion type, and centrifugation force on post-centrifugation sperm recovery rate and quality were evaluated. In Experiment 1, sperm recovery rate was higher (P<0.05) in conventional plastic conical-bottom tubes (103%) than in newly developed glass nipple-bottom tubes (96%) following cushioned centrifugation; however, several measures of semen quality (i.e., % total motility [MOT], % progressive motility [PMOT], curvilinear velocity, and average-path velocity) yielded higher values following centrifugation in nipple-bottom tubes (P<0.05). Sperm recovery rate following cushioned centrifugation was similar between semen previously diluted in optically clear centrifugation extender (100%) and semen diluted in opaque centrifugation extender (100%); however, MOT and PMOT were higher in semen subjected to cushioned centrifugation in opaque extender (P<0.05). An extender by tube-type interaction was not detected for recovery rate or post-centrifugation semen quality. In Experiment 2, sperm recovery rate following cushioned centrifugation in nipple-bottom tubes was similar when forces of 400xg or 600xg were applied (90 and 90%, respectively; P>0.05), and no resulting differences in semen quality were detected between these treatment groups (P>0.05). The type of iodixanol cushion medium used (i.e., OptiPrep, Eqcellsire Component B, or Cushion Fluid did not impact post-centrifugation semen quality, based on the laboratory values measured (P>0.05). In conclusion, cushioned centrifugation of stallion semen in either conical-bottom or nipple-bottom tubes yielded a high sperm harvest, while maintaining sperm function. An optically opaque extender, commonly used in the equine breeding industry, can be used to achieve this goal.
Waite
J A
JA
Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843-4475, USA.
Love
C C
CC
Brinsko
S P
SP
Teague
S R
SR
Salazar
J L
JL
Mancill
S S
SS
Varner
D D
DD
D000818:Animals; D002498:Centrifugation / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*; D015925:Cryopreservation / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary; D006736:Horses / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D012662:Semen Preservation / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*; D013048:Specimen Handling / Q000379:methods / Q000662:veterinary*; D013081:Sperm Motility / Q000502:physiology; D013094:Spermatozoa / Q000166:cytology* / Q000502:physiology