Controversy and consensus on pediatric donation after cardiac death: ethical issues and institutional process.
Donation after cardiac death (DCD) remains controversial in some pediatric institutions. An evidence-based, consensus-building approach to setting institutional policy about DCD can address the controversy openly and identify common ground. To resolve an extended internal debate regarding DCD policy at Children's Hospital Boston, a multidisciplinary task force was commissioned to engage in fact finding and deliberations about clinical and ethical issues in pediatric DCD, and attempt to reach consensus regarding the development of a protocol for pediatric DCD. Issues examined included values and attitudes of staff, families, and the public; number of possible candidates for DCD at the hospital; risks and benefits for child donors and their families; and research needs. Consensus was reached on a set of foundational ethical principles for pediatric DCD. With assistance from the local organ procurement organization (OPO), the task force developed a protocol for pediatric kidney DCD which most members believed could meet all the requirements of the foundational ethical principles. Complete consensus on the use of the protocol was not reached; however, almost all members supported initiation of kidney DCD for older pediatric patients who had wished to be organ donors. The hospital has implemented the protocol on this limited basis and established a process for considering proposals to expand the eligible donor population and include other organs.
Harrison
C H
CH
Office of Ethics, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. charlotte.harrison@childrens.harvard.edu
Laussen
P C
PC
D002648:Child; D032921:Consensus; D003643:Death; D005190:Family; D006776:Hospitals, Pediatric; D006801:Humans; D007258:Informed Consent; D008020:Life Support Care / Q000941:ethics; D013727:Terminal Care / Q000592:standards; D009927:Tissue and Organ Procurement / Q000941:ethics* / Q000458:organization & administration*