Compliance, conversion, and category induction.
When children hear an object referred to with a label that is moderately discrepant from its appearance, they frequently make inferences about that object consistent with the label rather than its appearance. We asked whether 3-year-olds actually believe these unexpected labels (i.e., conversion) or whether their inferences simply reflect a desire to comply with the considerable experimental demands of the induction task (i.e., compliance). Specifically, we asked how likely children would be to pass an unexpected label on to another person who had not been present during the labeling event. Results showed that children who used an unexpected label as the basis for inference passed that label on to another person about as often as they could remember it. This suggests that children's label-based inferences do reflect conversion rather than mere compliance.
Jaswal
Vikram K
VK
Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22904, USA. jaswal@virginia.edu
Lima
Olivia K
OK
Small
Jenna E
JE
D002675:Child, Preschool; D003210:Concept Formation / Q000502:physiology*; D003463:Cues; D004193:Discrimination Learning / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D005793:Generalization, Psychological / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D007804:Language Development; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology; D011939:Mental Recall / Q000502:physiology; D010470:Perceptual Masking / Q000502:physiology; D012660:Semantics; D012718:Set, Psychology; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*