Cognitive demands of error processing.
This study used a dual-task methodology to assess attention demands associated with error processing during an anticipation-timing task. A difference was predicted in attention demands during feedback on trials with correct responses and errors. This was addressed by requiring participants to respond to a probe reaction-time stimulus after augmented feedback presentation. 16 participants (8 men, 8 women) completed two phases, the reaction time task only and the anticipation-timing task with the probe RT task. False feedback indicating error and a financial reward manipulation were used to increase relevance of errors. Data supported the hypothesis that error processing is associated with higher cognitive demands than processing feedback denoting a correct response. Individuals responded with quicker probe reaction times during presentation of feedback on correct trials than on error trials. These results are discussed with respect to the cognitive processes which might occur during error processing and their role in motor learning.
Koehn
J D
JD
Simon Fraser University.
Dickinson
J
J
Goodman
D
D
D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D001364:Awareness / Q000502:physiology; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D030141:Feedback, Psychological / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D007839:Functional Laterality / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D048848:MAP Kinase Kinase Kinase 5; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory / Q000502:physiology; D011340:Problem Solving / Q000502:physiology*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D012201:Reward
D048848:MAP Kinase Kinase Kinase 5