Comparison of in vitro eye irritation potential by bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay to erythema scores in human eye sting test of surfactant-based formulations.
The bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay can be used to predict relative eye irritation potential of surfactant-based personal care formulations relative to a corporate benchmark. The human eye sting test is typically used to evaluate product claims of no tears/no stinging for children's bath products. A preliminary investigation was conducted to test a hypothesis that the BCOP assay could be used as a prediction model for relative ranking of human eye irritation responses under conditions of a standard human eye sting test to surfactant-based formulations. BCOP assays and human eye sting tests were conducted on 4 commercial and 1 prototype body wash (BW) developed specifically for children or as mild bath products. In the human eye sting test, 10 mul of a 10% dosing solution is instilled into one eye of each panelist (n = 20), and the contralateral eye is dosed with sterile water as a control. Bulbar conjunctival erythema responses of each eye are graded at 30 seconds by an ophthalmologist. The BCOP assay permeability values (optical density at 490 nm [OD(490)]) for the 5 BWs ranged from 0.438 to 1.252 (i.e., least to most irritating). By comparison, the number of panelists exhibiting erythema responses (mild to moderately pink) ranged from 3 of 20 panelists for the least irritating BW to 10 of 20 panelists for the most irritating BW tested. The relative ranking of eye irritation potential of the 5 BWs in the BCOP assay compares favorably with the relative ranking of the BWs in the human eye sting test. Based on these findings, the permeability endpoint of the BCOP assay, as described for surfactant-based formulations, showed promise as a prediction model for relative ranking of conjunctival erythema responses in the human eye. Consequently, screening of prototype formulations in the BCOP assay would allow for formula optimization of mild bath products prior to investment in a human eye sting test.
Cater
Kathleen C
KC
The Dial Corporation, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA.
Harbell
John W
JW
D000818:Animals; D001681:Biological Assay / Q000379:methods; D002417:Cattle; D002648:Child; D003228:Conjunctiva / Q000187:drug effects; D003315:Cornea / Q000187:drug effects; D003318:Corneal Opacity / Q000139:chemically induced*; D003358:Cosmetics / Q000737:chemistry / Q000633:toxicity*; D004890:Erythema / Q000139:chemically induced*; D005123:Eye / Q000187:drug effects*; D019793:Fluorescein; D006801:Humans; D066298:In Vitro Techniques; D010146:Pain / Q000139:chemically induced*; D010539:Permeability / Q000187:drug effects; D012915:Soaps / Q000737:chemistry / Q000633:toxicity*; D013501:Surface-Active Agents / Q000633:toxicity; D013666:Tears / Q000378:metabolism; D018675:Toxicity Tests / Q000379:methods*
D003358:Cosmetics; D012915:Soaps; D013501:Surface-Active Agents; D019793:Fluorescein