Individual differences in judging deception: accuracy and bias.
The authors report a meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception, confining attention to occasions when people judge strangers' veracity in real-time with no special aids. The authors have developed a statistical technique to correct nominal individual differences for differences introduced by random measurement error. Although researchers have suggested that people differ in the ability to detect lies, psychometric analyses of 247 samples reveal that these ability differences are minute. In terms of the percentage of lies detected, measurement-corrected standard deviations in judge ability are less than 1%. In accuracy, judges range no more widely than would be expected by chance, and the best judges are no more accurate than a stochastic mechanism would produce. When judging deception, people differ less in ability than in the inclination to regard others' statements as truthful. People also differ from one another as lie- and truth-tellers. They vary in the detectability of their lies. Moreover, some people are more credible than others whether lying or truth-telling. Results reveal that the outcome of a deception judgment depends more on the liar's credibility than any other individual difference.
Bond
Charles F
CF
Department of Psychology, Texas Christian University, TX, USA. cbond53@yahoo.com
Depaulo
Bella M
BM
D008192:Deception; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D007600:Judgment / Q000502:physiology*; D015588:Observer Variation; D011582:Psychological Theory; D011594:Psychometrics / Q000379:methods; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012919:Social Behavior