Task-irrelevant learning occurs only when the irrelevant feature is weak.
The role of attention in perceptual learning has been controversial. Numerous studies have reported that learning does not occur on stimulus features that are irrelevant to a subject's task [1,2] and have concluded that focused attention on a feature is necessary for a feature to be learned. In contrast, another line of studies has shown that perceptual learning occurs even on task-irrelevant features that are subthreshold, and concluded that attention on a feature is not required to learn that feature [3-5]. Here we attempt to reconcile these divergent findings by systematically exploring the relation between signal strength of the motion stimuli used during training and the resultant magnitude of perceptual learning. Our results show that performance improvements only occurred for the motion-stimuli trained at low, parathreshold, coherence levels. The results are in accord with the hypothesis that weak task-irrelevant signals fail to be 'noticed', and consequently to be suppressed, by the attention system and thus are learned, while stronger stimulus signals are detected, and suppressed [6], and are not learned. These results provide a parsimonious explanation of why task-irrelevant learning is found in some studies but not others, and could give an important clue to resolving a long-standing controversy.
Tsushima
Yoshiaki
Y
Seitz
Aaron R
AR
Watanabe
Takeo
T
D001288:Attention; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D009039:Motion Perception / Q000502:physiology; D010465:Perception / Q000502:physiology; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology