Object detection and basic-level categorization: sometimes you know it is there before you know what it is.
A tight temporal coupling between object detection (is an object there?) and object categorization (what kind of object is it?) has recently been reported (Grill-Spector & Kanwisher, 2005), suggesting that image segmentation into different objects and categorization of those objects at the basic level may be the very same mechanism. In the present work, we decoupled the time course of detection and categorization through two task manipulations. First, inverted objects were categorized significantly less accurately than upright objects across a range of image presentation durations, but no significant effect on object detection was observed. Second, systematically degrading stimuli affected categorization significantly more than object detection. The time course of object detection and object categorization can be selectively manipulated. They are not intrinsically linked. As soon as you know an object is there, you do not necessarily know what it is.
Mack
Michael L
ML
Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Gauthier
Isabel
I
Sadr
Javid
J
Palmeri
Thomas J
TJ
D001288:Attention; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D005364:Field Dependence-Independence; D006801:Humans; D009949:Orientation; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D010469:Perceptual Distortion; D010470:Perceptual Masking; D011601:Psychophysics; D011930:Reaction Time; D012718:Set, Psychology