Causal diversity effects in information seeking.
When trying to determine the root cause of an observed effect, people may seek out information with which to test a candidate hypothesis. In two studies, we investigated how knowledge of causal structure influences this information-seeking process. Specifically, we asked whether people would choose to test for pieces of evidence that were far apart or close together in the learned causal structure of a disease category. In parallel with findings showing people's tendency to select diverse evidence in argument testing (López, 1995), our participants tested for evidence distantly located within the causal structure. Simultaneously, they rated the probability of occurrence of such diverse evidence as comparatively low. These findings suggest that rather than seeking out information most likely to confirm the hypothesis, people seek out evidence that they believe will most strongly support the hypothesis if present but that they also believe is relatively unlikely to be present (that is, might disconfirm the hypothesis).
Kim
Nancy S
NS
Department of Psychology, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. n.kim@neu.edu
Yopchick
Jennelle E
JE
de Kwaadsteniet
Leontien
L
D001288:Attention; D015984:Causality; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003210:Concept Formation; D003657:Decision Making; D003924:Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D006967:Hypersensitivity / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000523:psychology; D008297:Male; D008606:Mental Processes; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011247:Pregnancy / Q000523:psychology; D011337:Probability Learning; D011340:Problem Solving; D011832:Radiation Injuries / Q000523:psychology