Field evidence that ecosystem service projects support biodiversity and diversify options.
Ecosystem service approaches to conservation are being championed as a new strategy for conservation, under the hypothesis that they will broaden and deepen support for biodiversity protection. Where traditional approaches focus on setting aside land by purchasing property rights, ecosystem service approaches aim to engage a much wider range of places, people, policies, and financial resources in conservation. This is particularly important given projected intensification of human impacts, with rapid growth in population size and individual aspirations. Here we use field research on 34 ecosystem service (ES) projects and 26 traditional biodiversity (BD) projects from the Western Hemisphere to test whether ecosystem service approaches show signs of realizing their putative potential. We find that the ES projects attract on average more than four times as much funding through greater corporate sponsorship and use of a wider variety of finance tools than BD projects. ES projects are also more likely to encompass working landscapes and the people in them. We also show that, despite previous concern, ES projects not only expand opportunities for conservation, but they are no less likely than BD projects to include or create protected areas. Moreover, they do not draw down limited financial resources for conservation but rather engage a more diverse set of funders. We also found, however, that monitoring of conservation outcomes in both cases is so infrequent that it is impossible to assess the effectiveness of either ES or BD approaches.
Goldman
Rebecca L
RL
Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources, Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5020, USA. rgoldman@tnc.org
Tallis
Heather
H
Kareiva
Peter
P
Daily
Gretchen C
GC
D044822:Biodiversity; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000191:economics; D017753:Ecosystem; D006801:Humans