title: Effects of conversational versus technical language on treatment preference and integrity.
abstract: Problem behaviors present a significant challenge for individuals with developmental disabilities and their caregivers. Interventions based on behavioral principles are effective in treating problem behaviors; however, some caregivers have difficulty adhering to treatment recommendations. Treatment adherence may be affected by the technical nature of behavioral terminology. Research suggests that caregivers better understand and are more comfortable with interventions described in conversational language; however, the effects of technical language on treatment implementation are unknown. In the current investigation, implementation of a behavioral treatment was monitored after caregivers were given either a technical or conversational description of the intervention. Implementation was more accurate when the treatment description was written in conversational language, suggesting that clinicians should write behavioral plans in conversational language.
authors.affiliation: Kennedy Krieger Institute and the University of Maryland Baltimore County, Behavioral Psychology, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
authors.forename: David P
authors.initials: DP
authors.lastname: Jarmolowicz
authors.forename: Sung Woo
authors.initials: SW
authors.lastname: Kahng
authors.forename: Einar T
authors.initials: ET
authors.lastname: Ingvarsson
authors.forename: Richard
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Goysovich
authors.forename: Rebecca
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Heggemeyer
authors.forename: Meagan K
authors.initials: MK
authors.lastname: Gregory
mesh_terms: D002648:Child; D002755:Choice Behavior; D003142:Communication; D002658:Developmental Disabilities; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D008037:Linguistics; D012660:Semantics