Word use and semantics in alternative medicine: a survey of editors of medical and related journals.
OBJECTIVE
To investigate the views, practices, and policies of medical journal editors on the use of words and phrases present in altmed manuscripts submitted for publication.


METHODS
Postal survey of 56 journals, with journals selected to cover a range of ISI medical/medically related categories and citation scores


RESULTS
The overall response rate was 62.5% (35/56); 5.9% (2/34) of responding journals had a policy on word use with respect to altmed; 12.9% (4/31) of editors of journals with no policy had discussed the subject among their staff; 7.4% (2/27) planned to discuss the matter or introduce/improve guidelines; 17.9% (5/28) had discussed the subject with other editors; 10% (3/30) considered the matter to be a problem; and 32% (9/28) had changed altmed wording or had a reviewer suggest changes.


CONCLUSIONS
There exists a general lack of policy or discussion on the use of words in altmed papers. Editors do not in general recognize the use of words in altmed as being an issue of special significance. Informed editorial attitudes and policy on the special semantic issues associated with altmed is required to enable journal editors to serve as effective gatekeepers of medical knowledge.
Smith
Kevin R
KR
School of Contemporary Sciences, University of Abertay, Dundee, Scotland, United Kingdom. k.smith@tay.ac.uk
Sampson
Wallace
W
D015706:Bibliometrics; D000529:Complementary Therapies; D003625:Data Collection; D035081:Editorial Policies; D011643:Publishing; D009626:Terminology as Topic