title: Death, dying, and domination.
abstract: This Article critiques conventional liberal arguments for the right to die on liberal grounds. It contends that these arguments do not go far enough to recognize and address private, and in particular structural, forms of domination. It presents an alternative that does, which is thus more respectful of true freedom in the context of death and dying, and also more consistent with liberalism. After discussing obstacles to the achievement of a right to die that encompasses freedom from both public and private domination, the Article closes with a significant reform project within bioethics that might help bring it about.
authors.affiliation: The Ohio State University's Moritz College of Law and The University of Michigan Law School, USA.
authors.forename: Marc
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Spindelman
mesh_terms: D001675:Bioethics; D003068:Coercion; D003643:Death; D005610:Freedom; D006801:Humans; D026684:Personal Autonomy; D011057:Politics; D012297:Right to Die / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D014481:United States