Counteraction between two kinds of conditioned inhibition training.
In a Pavlovian fear-conditioning preparation, we investigated the effects of combining Pavlovian and explicitly unpaired inhibition treatments. A summation test for inhibition suggested a strong tendency toward unpaired inhibition when that treatment was administered alone and found robust Pavlovian inhibition when that treatment was administered alone, but detected little behavior indicative of inhibition in subjects that experienced both treatments during training. The retardation test showed reliable unpaired and Pavlovian inhibition when these treatments were administered alone but no indication of inhibition in subjects that experienced both treatments. These counterintuitive results suggest that in some circumstances the effects of two inhibitory treatments are not additive but rather counteractive. The present results provide some information about the nature of conditioned inhibition and, more generally, cue interaction.
Urcelay
Gonzalo P
GP
Department of Psychology, State University of New York, Binghamton 13902-6000, USA.
Miller
Ralph R
RR
D000818:Animals; D001245:Association Learning; D001288:Attention; D003214:Conditioning, Classical; D003463:Cues; D004597:Electroshock; D005239:Fear; D005260:Female; D006185:Habituation, Psychophysiologic; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D008297:Male; D011939:Mental Recall; D009042:Motivation; D051381:Rats; D017207:Rats, Sprague-Dawley; D012193:Reversal Learning; D014163:Transfer, Psychology