title: The last universal common ancestor: emergence, constitution and genetic legacy of an elusive forerunner.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Since the reclassification of all life forms in three Domains (Archaea, Bacteria, Eukarya), the identity of their alleged forerunner (Last Universal Common Ancestor or LUCA) has been the subject of extensive controversies: progenote or already complex organism, prokaryote or protoeukaryote, thermophile or mesophile, product of a protracted progression from simple replicators to complex cells or born in the cradle of "catalytically closed" entities? We present a critical survey of the topic and suggest a scenario.
  
  
  RESULTS
  LUCA does not appear to have been a simple, primitive, hyperthermophilic prokaryote but rather a complex community of protoeukaryotes with a RNA genome, adapted to a broad range of moderate temperatures, genetically redundant, morphologically and metabolically diverse. LUCA's genetic redundancy predicts loss of paralogous gene copies in divergent lineages to be a significant source of phylogenetic anomalies, i.e. instances where a protein tree departs from the SSU-rRNA genealogy; consequently, horizontal gene transfer may not have the rampant character assumed by many. Examining membrane lipids suggest LUCA had sn1,2 ester fatty acid lipids from which Archaea emerged from the outset as thermophilic by "thermoreduction," with a new type of membrane, composed of sn2,3 ether isoprenoid lipids; this occurred without major enzymatic reconversion. Bacteria emerged by reductive evolution from LUCA and some lineages further acquired extreme thermophily by convergent evolution. This scenario is compatible with the hypothesis that the RNA to DNA transition resulted from different viral invasions as proposed by Forterre. Beyond the controversy opposing "replication first" to metabolism first", the predictive arguments of theories on "catalytic closure" or "compositional heredity" heavily weigh in favour of LUCA's ancestors having emerged as complex, self-replicating entities from which a genetic code arose under natural selection.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Life was born complex and the LUCA displayed that heritage. It had the "body "of a mesophilic eukaryote well before maturing by endosymbiosis into an organism adapted to an atmosphere rich in oxygen. Abundant indications suggest reductive evolution of this complex and heterogeneous entity towards the "prokaryotic" Domains Archaea and Bacteria. The word "prokaryote" should be abandoned because epistemologically unsound.
  
  
  METHODS
  This article was reviewed by Anthony Poole, Patrick Forterre, and Nicolas Galtier.
authors.affiliation: JM Wiame Research Institute for Microbiology and Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1 ave E. Gryzon, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium. nglansdo@vub.ac.be
authors.forename: Nicolas
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Glansdorff
authors.forename: Ying
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Xu
authors.forename: Bernard
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Labedan
mesh_terms: D001105:Archaea / Q000166:cytology / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D001419:Bacteria / Q000166:cytology / Q000235:genetics* / Q000378:metabolism; D005075:Biological Evolution; D005057:Eukaryotic Cells / Q000166:cytology / Q000378:metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D010802:Phylogeny; D011387:Prokaryotic Cells / Q000166:cytology / Q000378:metabolism / Q000502:physiology*