title: A novel circular invasion assay mimics in vivo invasive behavior of cancer cell lines and distinguishes single-cell motility in vitro.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Classical in vitro wound-healing assays and other techniques designed to study cell migration and invasion have been used for many years to elucidate the various mechanisms associated with metastasis. However, many of these methods are limited in their ability to achieve reproducible, quantitative results that translate well in vivo. Such techniques are also commonly unable to elucidate single-cell motility mechanisms, an important factor to be considered when studying dissemination. Therefore, we developed and applied a novel in vitro circular invasion assay (CIA) in order to bridge the translational gap between in vitro and in vivo findings, and to distinguish between different modes of invasion.
  
  
  METHODS
  Our method is a modified version of a standard circular wound-healing assay with an added matrix barrier component (Matrigel), which better mimics those physiological conditions present in vivo. We examined 3 cancer cell lines (MCF-7, SCOV-3, and MDA-MB-231), each with a different established degree of aggressiveness, to test our assay's ability to detect diverse levels of invasiveness. Percent wound closure (or invasion) was measured using time-lapse microscopy and advanced image analysis techniques. We also applied the CIA technique to DLD-1 cells in the presence of lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), a bioactive lipid that was recently shown to stimulate cancer cell colony dispersal into single migratory cells, in order to validate our method's ability to detect collective and individual motility.
  
  
  RESULTS
  CIA method was found to be highly reproducible, with negligible levels of variance measured. It successfully detected the anticipated low, moderate, and high levels of invasion that correspond to in vivo findings for cell lines tested. It also captured that DLD-1 cells exhibit individual migration upon LPA stimulation, and collective behavior in its absence.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Given its ability to both determine pseudo-realistic invasive cell behavior in vitro and capture subtle differences in cell motility, we propose that our CIA method may shed some light on the cellular mechanisms underlying cancer invasion and deserves inclusion in further studies. The broad implication of this work is the development of a reproducible, quantifiable, high-resolution method that can be applied to various models, to include an unlimited number of parameters and/or agents that may influence invasion.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cancer Biology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA. y.kam@vanderbilt.edu
authors.forename: Yoonseok
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Kam
authors.forename: Cherise
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Guess
authors.forename: Lourdes
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Estrada
authors.forename: Brandy
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Weidow
authors.forename: Vito
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Quaranta
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000473:pathology; D045744:Cell Line, Tumor; D054443:Cell Migration Assays / Q000379:methods*; D002471:Cell Transformation, Neoplastic / Q000473:pathology; D015179:Colorectal Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000473:pathology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D018613:Microscopy, Confocal; D009362:Neoplasm Metastasis / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology; D009375:Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000473:pathology; D010051:Ovarian Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000473:pathology; D014945:Wound Healing / Q000502:physiology