Evidence-based biosafety: a review of the principles and effectiveness of microbiological containment measures.
We examined the available evidence on the effectiveness of measures aimed at protecting humans and the environment against the risks of working with genetically modified microorganisms (GMOs) and with non-GMO pathogenic microorganisms. A few principles and methods underlie the current biosafety practice: risk assessment, biological containment, concentration and enclosure, exposure minimization, physical containment, and hazard minimization. Many of the current practices are based on experience and expert judgment. The effectiveness of biosafety measures may be evaluated at the level of single containment equipment items and procedures, at the level of the laboratory as a whole, or at the clinical-epidemiological level. Data on the containment effectiveness of equipment and laboratories are scarce and fragmented. Laboratory-acquired infections (LAIs) are therefore important for evaluating the effectiveness of biosafety. For the majority of LAIs there appears to be no direct cause, suggesting that failures of biosafety were not noticed or that containment may have been insufficient. The number of reported laboratory accidents associated with GMOs is substantially lower than that of those associated with non-GMOs. It is unknown to what extent specific measures contribute to the overall level of biosafety. We therefore recommend that the evidence base of biosafety practice be strengthened.
Kimman
Tjeerd G
TG
Center for Infectious Disease Control, RIVM-National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, PO Box 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven, The Netherlands. tg.kimman@rivm.nl
Smit
Eric
E
Klein
Michèl R
MR
D003264:Containment of Biohazards / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D007753:Laboratories / Q000592:standards; D008506:Medical Waste / Q000145:classification; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012449:Safety
D008506:Medical Waste