Partial reinforcement and context switch effects in human predictive learning.
Human participants were trained in a trial-by-trial contingency judgements task in which they had to predict the probability of an outcome (diarrhoea) following different cues (food names) in different contexts (restaurants). Cue P was paired with the outcome on half of the trials (partial reinforcement), while cue C was paired with the outcome on all the trials (continuous reinforcement), both cues in Context A. Test was conducted in both Context A and a different but equally familiar context (B). Context change decreased judgements to C, but not to P (Experiment 1). This effect was found only in the cue trained in the context where a different cue was partially reinforced (Experiment 2). Context switch effects disappeared when different cues received partial reinforcement in both contexts of training (Experiment 3). The implications of these results for an explanation of context switch effects in terms of ambiguity in the meaning of the cues prompting attention to the context (e.g., Bouton, 1997) are discussed.
Abad
María J F
MJ
Departamento de Psicología, University of Jaén, Paraje de las Lagunillas s/n, Jaén, Spain.
Ramos-Alvarez
Manuel M
MM
Rosas
Juan M
JM
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001245:Association Learning; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D003463:Cues; D004193:Discrimination Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment / Q000502:physiology; D008297:Male; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012054:Reinforcement, Psychology; D055815:Young Adult