Alternative sources of pluripotency: science, ethics, and stem cells.
Despite many advances in human embryonic stem cell (hESC) technology the ethical dilemma involving the destruction of a human embryo is one factor that has limited the development of hESC based clinical therapies. Two recent reports describing the production of pluripotent stem cells following the in vitro reprogramming of human somatic cells with certain defined factors illustrate one potential method of bypassing the ethical debate surrounding hESCs (Yu J, Vodyanik MA, Smuga-Otto K, et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science. 2007 Dec;318(5858):1917-1920; Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, et al. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007 Nov;131(5): 861-872.). Other alternative methods include nuclear transfer, altered nuclear transfer, and parthenogenesis; each with its own set of advantages and disadvantages. This review discusses recent advances in these technologies with specific focus on the issues of embryo destruction, oocyte recovery, and the potential of each technology to produce large scale, patient specific cell transplantation therapies that would require little or no immunosuppression.
Kastenberg
Zachary J
ZJ
Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health and WiCell Research Institute, Madison, WI 53792, USA.
Odorico
Jon S
JS
D001675:Bioethics; D065150:Cellular Reprogramming; D006801:Humans; D053652:Nuclear Transfer Techniques; D010312:Parthenogenesis; D039904:Pluripotent Stem Cells; D012586:Science