What experimental approaches (eg, in vivo, in vitro, tissue retrieval) are effective in investigating the biologic effects of particles?
Understanding the complex cellular and tissue mechanisms and interactions resulting in periprosthetic osteolysis requires a number of experimental approaches, each of which has its own set of advantages and limitations. In vitro models allow for the isolation of individual cell populations and have furthered our understanding of particle-cell interactions; however, they are limited because they do not mimic the complex tissue environment in which multiple cell interactions occur. In vivo animal models investigate the tissue interactions associated with periprosthetic osteolysis, but the choice of species and whether the implant system is subjected to mechanical load or to unloaded conditions are critical in assessing whether these models can be extrapolated to the clinical condition. Rigid analysis of retrieved tissue from clinical cases of osteolysis offers a different approach to studying the biologic process of osteolysis, but it is limited in that the tissue analyzed represents the end-stage of this process and, thus, may not reflect this process adequately.
Bostrom
Mathias
M
Weill Medical School of Cornell University, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
O'Keefe
Regis
R
D000818:Animals; D019643:Arthroplasty, Replacement / Q000009:adverse effects*; D001672:Biocompatible Materials / Q000009:adverse effects; D004195:Disease Models, Animal; D006801:Humans; D007595:Joint Prosthesis; D010014:Osteolysis / Q000209:etiology*; D011475:Prosthesis Failure; D012107:Research Design; D013314:Stress, Mechanical
D001672:Biocompatible Materials