The all-too-flexible abductive method: ATOM's normative status.
The author discusses the abductive theory of method (ATOM) by Brian Haig from a philosophical perspective, connecting his theory with a number of issues and trends in contemporary philosophy of science. It is argued that as it stands, the methodology presented by Haig is too permissive. Both the use of analogical reasoning and the application of exploratory factor analysis leave us with too many candidate theories to choose from, and explanatory coherence cannot be expected to save the day. The author ends with some suggestions to remedy the permissiveness and lack of normative force in ATOM, deriving from the experimental practice within which psychological data are produced.
Romeijn
Jan-Willem
JW
Faculty of Philosophy, University of Groningen, Oude Boteringestraat 52, 9712GL Groningen, The Netherlands. j.w.romeijn@rug.nl
D001525:Behavioral Sciences / Q000379:methods; D005163:Factor Analysis, Statistical; D006801:Humans; D011582:Psychological Theory; D011584:Psychology / Q000379:methods*