An ecosystem services framework to support both practical conservation and economic development.
The core idea of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment is that the human condition is tightly linked to environmental condition. This assertion suggests that conservation and development projects should be able to achieve both ecological and social progress without detracting from their primary objectives. Whereas "win-win" projects that achieve both conservation and economic gains are a commendable goal, they are not easy to attain. An analysis of World Bank projects with objectives of alleviating poverty and protecting biodiversity revealed that only 16% made major progress on both objectives. Here, we provide a framework for anticipating win-win, lose-lose, and win-lose outcomes as a result of how people manage their ecosystem services. This framework emerges from detailed explorations of several case studies in which biodiversity conservation and economic development coincide and cases in which there is joint failure. We emphasize that scientific advances around ecosystem service production functions, tradeoffs among multiple ecosystem services, and the design of appropriate monitoring programs are necessary for the implementation of conservation and development projects that will successfully advance both environmental and social goals. The potentially bright future of jointly advancing ecosystem services, conservation, and human well-being will be jeopardized unless a global monitoring effort is launched that uses the many ongoing projects as a grand experiment.
Tallis
Heather
H
Department of Biology and Natural Capital Project, Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. htallis@stanford.edu
Kareiva
Peter
P
Marvier
Michelle
M
Chang
Amy
A
D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods* / Q000639:trends; D004467:Economics / Q000639:trends*; D017753:Ecosystem; D006801:Humans; D011203:Poverty