Variance components for test-day milk, fat, and protein yield, and somatic cell score for analyzing management information.
Test-day (TD) models are used in most countries to perform national genetic evaluations for dairy cattle. The TD models estimate lactation curves and their changes as well as variation in populations. Although potentially useful, little attention has been given to the application of TD models for management purposes. The potential of the TD model for management use depends on its ability to describe within- or between-herd variation that can be linked to specific management practices. The aim of this study was to estimate variance components for milk yield, milk component yields, and somatic cell score (SCS) of dairy cows in the Ragusa and Vicenza areas of Italy, such that the most relevant sources of variation can be identified for the development of management parameters. The available data set contained 1,080,637 TD records of 42,817 cows in 471 herds. Variance components were estimated with a multilactation, random-regression, TD animal model by using the software adopted by NRS for the Dutch national genetic evaluation. The model comprised 5 fixed effects [region x parity x days in milk (DIM), parity x year of calving x season of calving x DIM, parity x age at calving x year of calving, parity x calving interval x stage of pregnancy, and year of test x calendar week of test] and random herd x test date, regressions for herd lactation curve (HCUR), the animal additive genetic effect, and the permanent environmental effect by using fourth-order Legendre polynomials. The HCUR variances for milk and protein yields were highest around the time of peak yield (DIM 50 to 150), whereas for fat yield the HCUR variance was relatively constant throughout first lactation and decreased following the peak around 40 to 90 DIM for lactations 2 and 3. For SCS, the HCUR variances were relatively small compared with the genetic, permanent environmental, and residual variances. For all the traits except SCS, the variance explained by random herd x test date was much smaller than the HCUR variance, which indicates that the development of management parameters should focus on between-herd parameters during peak lactation for milk and milk components. For SCS, the within-herd variance was greater than the between-herd variance, suggesting that the focus should be on management parameters explaining variances at the cow level. The present study showed clear evidence for the benefits of using a random regression TD model for management decisions.
Caccamo
M
M
Consorzio Ricerca Filiera Lattiero-Casearia (CoRFiLaC), Regione Siciliana, 97100 Ragusa, Italy. caccamo@corfilac.it
Veerkamp
R F
RF
de Jong
G
G
Pool
M H
MH
Petriglieri
R
R
Licitra
G
G
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D000818:Animals; D002417:Cattle / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology*; D002452:Cell Count; D003612:Dairying / Q000379:methods*; D004777:Environment; D005223:Fats / Q000032:analysis*; D005260:Female; D014644:Genetic Variation; D007774:Lactation / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology*; D008892:Milk / Q000737:chemistry / Q000166:cytology; D008894:Milk Proteins / Q000032:analysis*; D008954:Models, Biological; D010298:Parity; D010641:Phenotype; D011247:Pregnancy; D013030:Spain
D005223:Fats; D008894:Milk Proteins