Soft tissue coverage at the resource-challenged facility.
Covering soft tissue defects remains challenging for orthopaedic surgeons, especially those in resource-challenged facilities. Covering tissue defects follow a plan from simple to complex: primary closure, local flap, area flap, pedicle flap, and free flap. I will limit my discussion to the role of latter two. At the district-level hospital in Vietnam, pedicle flaps are generally more useful, so I will discuss free flaps only briefly. The choices of pedicle flaps include: kite flap, posterior interosseous flap, radial flap (Chinese flap), neurocutaneous flap, anterolateral thigh fasciocutaneous flap, gastrocnemius flap, sural flap, posterior leg flaps; we typically use a free flap with the latissimus dorsi. Soft tissue coverage with pedicle flaps has many advantages: reliability, relatively easy harvest, and good blood supply. Free flaps with microanastomosis have an important place in covering difficult medium- or large-sized soft tissue defects but also require more instruments and more highly trained surgeons.
Nguyen
Tuan Anh
TA
Department of Plastic and Cosmetic Surgery, University Medical Center, 215 Hong Bang St., 5th District, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. tuana@hcm.vnn.vn
D017048:Health Care Costs; D015276:Health Care Rationing; D006297:Health Services Accessibility / Q000191:economics; D054625:Healthcare Disparities / Q000191:economics; D006767:Hospitals, District / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration*; D006801:Humans; D010043:Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care; D019651:Plastic Surgery Procedures / Q000191:economics; D017695:Soft Tissue Injuries / Q000191:economics / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D013518:Surgery, Plastic / Q000191:economics / Q000458:organization & administration; D013524:Surgical Flaps / Q000191:economics; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014744:Vietnam