title: [Influence of double rice cropping system innovation on paddy soil profile form and soil characteristics].
abstract: Field experiments were conducted on the double rice cropping paddy field in red soil area to evaluate the influence of cropping system innovation on soil profile form and related soil characteristics. Four cropping systems of rice-rice-Chinese Milkvetch (Astragalus sinicus Linn.), forage, paddy-upland rotation, and upland were substituted for the double rice cropping system. The results indicated that compared with those under double rice cropping system, the thickness of cultivated horizon under upland cropping system increased by 4 cm, that of plow pan declined by 2 cm, > 2 mm aggregates in wet-sieved particle-size fractions increased by 6.94%, wet-sieved mean-mass diameter increased by 0.37 mm, contents of humic acid carbon and fulvic acid carbon increased by 0.15 and 0.49 g kg(-1), respectively, and quotient of aggregates water stability was 0.78 times higher. Under paddy-upland rotation, the quotient of aggregates water stability was higher (95.86), while soil nutrient contents changed a little. Under rice-rice-Chinese Milkvetch system, soil organic matter content increased by 1.3 g kg(-1), quotient of aggregates water stability declined by 8.82, but other parameters had less changes. Under forage system, the thickness of cultivated and transitional horizons increased by 2 cm and 9 cm, respectively, quotient of aggregates water stability increased by 1.39, while the contents of soil organic matter and total potassium decreased by 5.6 and 2.8 g kg(-1), respectively. Among all test cropping systems, forage system had the greatest changes in soil characteristics. It was completely feasible to substitute the local double rice cropping system for paddy-upland rotation or upland cropping, particularly in the areas where full irrigation was not available. However, attention should be paid to the decrease of soil potassium content when the cropping system innovation was practiced.
authors.affiliation: Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China. zengxb@cjac.org.cn
authors.forename: Xi-Bai
authors.initials: XB
authors.lastname: Zeng
authors.forename: Nan
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Sun
authors.forename: Ju-Sheng
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Gao
authors.forename: Lian-Fang
authors.initials: LF
authors.lastname: Li
authors.forename: Bo-Ren
authors.initials: BR
authors.lastname: Wang
authors.forename: Ling-Yu
authors.initials: LY
authors.lastname: Bai
mesh_terms: D000383:Agriculture / Q000379:methods*; D001578:Benzopyrans / Q000032:analysis; D018556:Crops, Agricultural / Q000254:growth & development; D017753:Ecosystem; D006812:Humic Substances / Q000032:analysis*; D012275:Oryza / Q000254:growth & development*; D012987:Soil / Q000032:analysis*; D014867:Water / Q000032:analysis
chemical_list: D001578:Benzopyrans; D006812:Humic Substances; D012987:Soil; D014867:Water; C005023:fulvic acid