Egg transmission of avian reoviruses in chickens: comparison of a trypsin-sensitive and a trypsin-resistant strain.
Two groups of commercial Light Sussex hens with no cultural evidence of reovirus infection and very low titres of neutralising antibodies were mated with cockerels from 17 weeks of age. At 27 weeks of age the birds were separated into three groups, and were inoculated intranasally and intravenously with avian reovirus strain R2 which is resistant to trypsin, with strain TR1 which is sensitive to the enzyme or sham-inoculated. Of the eggs laid by the hens infected with strain R2, 13/29 infertile eggs and embryos which fails to hatch were positive for virus, as were 6/70 hatched chicks. Despite this, virus was never isolated from cloacal swabs from the hens. Virus-infected eggs were laid between days 5 to 17 post inoculation (p.i.). Virus was isolated from the liver of all six R2 virus-positive chicks, from the hock joint of four and from the intestine of three. In contrast, for the group infected with the trypsin-sensitive virus TR1, of 120 eggs laid in the 5-week period, virus was isolated once only, from a chick hatched from an egg laid 7 days p.i. This infected chick was one of 83 which hatched and virus was found only in the joint. In a further experiment, two groups of mature SPF hens were inoculated with the reoviruses as above. Cloacal swabs and tissue examination showed greater virus excretion and tissue distribution of R2 than TR1. These results helped to explain the much higher egg transmission rate of R2 than TR1. However, the rate of vertical transmission of chicken reoviruses in nature, where the infectious dose would normally be lower than given here, is likely to be low.
Al-Muffarej
S I
SI
Department of Veterinary Pathology, University of Liverpool, Neston, South Wirral, UK.
Savage
C E
CE
Jones
R C
RC