Set-size effects for identification versus localization depend on the visual search task.
In both behavior and neuroscience research, it is debated whether the processing of identity and location is closely bound throughout processing. One aspect of this debate is the possibly privileged processing of identity or location. For example, processing identity may have unlimited capacity, while processing location does not. The authors have investigated the possibility of such privileged processing by measuring set-size effects for a variety of identification and localization tasks. In particular, set-size effects in accuracy visual search are measured with either 1 or 2 possible targets. For 1-target tasks, set-size effects are smaller for identification than localization; for 2-target tasks, set-size effects are larger for identification than localization. The observed crossover interaction is inconsistent with a privileged processing hypothesis for either identity or location. Furthermore, this interaction is predicted by an independent channel model based on signal detection theory, in which the details of each decision determine the relative magnitude of the set-size effects. This result is consistent with the similar processing of identity and location, and it refutes the privileged processing hypothesis for either identity or location.
Busey
Tom
T
Department of Psychology, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, USA. busey@indiana.edu
Palmer
John
J
D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention; D003463:Cues; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D005403:Fixation, Ocular; D005556:Form Perception; D006801:Humans; D007266:Inhibition, Psychological; D008568:Memory; D008960:Models, Psychological; D009949:Orientation; D011601:Psychophysics; D011930:Reaction Time; D017603:Signal Detection, Psychological; D012858:Size Perception; D013028:Space Perception; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis