Affective forecasting: an unrecognized challenge in making serious health decisions.
Patients facing medical decisions that will impact quality of life make assumptions about how they will adjust emotionally to living with health declines and disability. Despite abundant research on decision-making, we have no direct research on how accurately patients envision their future well-being and how this influences their decisions. Outside medicine, psychological research on "affective forecasting" consistently shows that people poorly predict their future ability to adapt to adversity. This finding is important for medicine, since many serious health decisions hinge on quality-of-life judgments. We describe three specific mechanisms for affective forecasting errors that may influence health decisions: focalism, in which people focus more on what will change than on what will stay the same; immune neglect, in which they fail to envision how their own coping skills will lessen their unhappiness; and failure to predict adaptation, in which people fail to envision shifts in what they value. We discuss emotional and social factors that interact with these cognitive biases. We describe how caregivers can recognize these biases in the clinical setting and suggest interventions to help patients recognize and address affective forecasting errors.
Halpern
Jodi
J
Joint Medical Program, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94705, USA. jhalpern@berkeley.edu
Arnold
Robert M
RM
D000339:Affect; D003657:Decision Making; D005544:Forecasting; D006304:Health Status; D006801:Humans; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D021641:Recognition, Psychology