title: Microleakage of all-ceramic crowns using self-etching resin luting agents.
abstract: Self-etching adhesive systems are a new generation of materials that possess acidic methacrylates that can generate self-adhesion. There is limited data reported on the marginal leakage of ceramic restorations bonded with self-etching adhesive materials. This study assessed and compared the amount of microleakage of bonded ceramic crowns using three different types of self-etching adhesive systems with and without a die spacer. Eighteen human molars were prepared for all-ceramic IPS Empress crowns and the teeth were randomly assigned to each experimental group. The buccal side had the preparation finish line 1.5 mm below the CEJ, and the lingual finish line was 1.5 mm above the CEJ, creating margins in enamel and dentin. Two die-spacing techniques were used (three layers or no layer of die spacer). Each crown restoration was cemented with one of three self-etching resin luting agents (Panavia F 2.0, Multilink and RelyX Unicem). The specimens were thermally cycled for 1000 cycles, then immersed in a 5% methylene blue dye solution for 24 hours. The teeth were then rinsed, embedded in clear epoxy resin and sectioned. A total of 60 sections were evaluated for each type of resin luting agent using digital image analysis at 70x magnification. A novel formula, using mean percentage of microleakage, was developed by dividing the extent of dye penetration along the tooth/resin luting cement interphase and the total perimeter of the tooth crown surface. The data were analyzed using three-way analysis of variance at the 0.05 level of significance. Fisher's PLSD intervals were calculated for comparing significant means. Panavia F 2.0 showed a lower degree of microleakage than RelyX Unicem and Multilink at both the enamel and dentin margins. Interactions of the main effects (cement, margin and die spacer technique) were all highly significant (p< or =0.004). The degree of microleakage was higher on the dentin margins than on the enamel margins (p<0.0001). The degree of microleakage for the die spacer group was not significantly different from the group with no die spacer technique (p>0.1). Overall, Panavia F 2.0 showed the least microleakage, followed by RelyX Unicem and Multilink, respectively.
authors.affiliation: Department of Restorative Dentistry and Biomaterials, The University of Texas Dental Branch at Houston, Houston, TX, USA. Cynthia.Trajtenberg@uth.tmc.edu
authors.forename: Cynthia Paulina
authors.initials: CP
authors.lastname: Trajtenberg
authors.forename: Santiago J
authors.initials: SJ
authors.lastname: Caram
authors.forename: Sudarat
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Kiat-amnuay
mesh_terms: D000134:Acid Etching, Dental / Q000379:methods; D000538:Aluminum Silicates / Q000737:chemistry; D002484:Cementation / Q000379:methods; D004396:Coloring Agents; D003442:Crowns; D001840:Dental Bonding / Q000379:methods; D003743:Dental Enamel / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D003763:Dental Leakage / Q000145:classification*; D003776:Dental Porcelain / Q000737:chemistry*; D017267:Dental Prosthesis Design; D003804:Dentin / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods; D008422:Materials Testing; D008751:Methylene Blue; D019279:Resin Cements / Q000737:chemistry*; D013499:Surface Properties; D013696:Temperature; D013997:Time Factors; D019237:Tooth Cervix / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D019231:Tooth Preparation, Prosthodontic / Q000379:methods
chemical_list: D000538:Aluminum Silicates; D004396:Coloring Agents; C075815:IPS-Empress ceramic; C438843:Panavia-Fluoro; C483701:Rely X Unicem; D019279:Resin Cements; C502351:multilink adhesive system; D003776:Dental Porcelain; D008751:Methylene Blue