title: Comparative outcomes study using the volar locking plating system for distal radius fractures in both young adults and adults older than 60 years.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Despite the high prevalence and impact of distal radius fractures (DRFs) on older patients, the currently available literature regarding DRFs in older adults lacks adequate comparative treatment data. The purpose of this prospective, controlled outcomes study is to compare outcomes using the volar locking plating system (VLPS) for DRFs in both older and younger adults and to assert the eligibility of older patients for surgical management with the VLPS.
  
  
  METHODS
  Consecutive, eligible patients were enrolled into our prospective study over a 2-year period on the basis of strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. Subjects were entered into 2 cohorts based on age: 20-40 years and >60 years. Patient outcomes and complication rates were evaluated at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Outcome measures included the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), grip strength, active wrist and forearm range of motion, the Jebsen-Taylor test, and radiographic parameters.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Fifty-five patients (30 young and 25 older adults) with unilateral, inadequately reduced DRFs were enrolled and received surgical treatment with the VLPS. We observed no statistically significant difference in any of the outcomes for all 3 follow-up periods, except the Jebsen-Taylor test, which displayed a trend toward a worse outcome in the older-age cohort. Whereas older patients continued to improve throughout their 12-month postoperative visits, younger patients achieved their maximum recovery during the 6-month follow-up period, suggesting different recovery patterns. At the 12-month assessment, older patients were able to achieve a higher mean MHQ score than their younger counterparts (normalized mean: 85% and 82%, respectively). Complication rates were similar between the 2 groups for all 3 time periods, with most occurring on or before the 3-month postoperative visit.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study indicates that the VLPS is successful in managing DRFs in older patients without increased complications compared to younger patients. For older patients without prohibitive surgical risks, internal fixation using the VLPS yields comparable outcomes to younger patients. However, these conclusions do not necessarily apply to other surgical techniques used to manage DRFs in older adults.
  
  
  METHODS
  Therapeutic II.
authors.affiliation: Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, The University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0340, USA. kecchung@umich.edu
authors.forename: Kevin C
authors.initials: KC
authors.lastname: Chung
authors.forename: Lee
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Squitieri
authors.forename: H Myra
authors.initials: HM
authors.lastname: Kim
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001860:Bone Plates; D005260:Female; D005593:Fracture Fixation, Internal / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D018737:Hand Strength; D006801:Humans; D016014:Linear Models; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D053401:Palmar Plate / Q000601:surgery*; D011183:Postoperative Complications; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011859:Radiography; D011885:Radius Fractures / Q000145:classification / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular / Q000502:physiology; D012044:Regression Analysis; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D016896:Treatment Outcome