Motivation, affect, and hemispheric asymmetry: power versus affiliation.
In 4 experiments, the authors examined to what extent information related to different social needs (i.e., power vs. affiliation) is associated with hemispheric laterality. Response latencies to a lateralized dot-probe task following lateralized pictures or verbal labels that were associated with positive or negative episodes related to power, affiliation, or achievement revealed clear-cut laterality effects. These effects were a function of need content rather than of valence: Power-related stimuli were associated with right visual field (left hemisphere) superiority, whereas affiliation-related stimuli were associated with left visual field (right hemisphere) superiority. Additional results demonstrated that in contrast to power, affiliation primes were associated with better discrimination between coherent word triads (e.g., goat, pass, and green, all related to mountain) and noncoherent triads, a remote associate task known to activate areas of the right hemisphere.
Kuhl
Julius
J
Department of Human Sciences, Universitat Osnabruck, Osnabruck, Germany. kuhl@uos.de
Kazén
Miguel
M
D000328:Adult; D000339:Affect; D001288:Attention; D001931:Brain Mapping; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D004292:Dominance, Cerebral / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D007839:Functional Laterality / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009042:Motivation; D010553:Personality Development; D011209:Power, Psychological; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D014794:Visual Fields; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*