How does interhemispheric communication in visual word recognition work? Deciding between early and late integration accounts of the split fovea theory.
It has recently been shown that interhemispheric communication is needed for the processing of foveally presented words. In this study, we examine whether the integration of information happens at an early stage, before word recognition proper starts, or whether the integration is part of the recognition process itself. Two lexical decision experiments are reported in which words were presented at different fixation positions. In Experiment 1, a masked form priming task was used with primes that had two adjacent letters transposed. The results showed that although the fixation position had a substantial influence on the transposed letter priming effect, the priming was not smaller when the transposed letters were sent to different hemispheres than when they were projected to the same hemisphere. In Experiment 2, stimuli were presented that either had high frequency hemifield competitors or could be identified unambiguously on the basis of the information in one hemifield. Again, the lexical decision times did not vary as a function of hemifield competitors. These results are consistent with the early integration account, as presented in the SERIOL model of visual word recognition.
Van der Haegen
Lise
L
Department of Psychology, University of London, Egham, UK.
Brysbaert
Marc
M
Davis
Colin J
CJ
D000704:Analysis of Variance; D054022:Cerebrum / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D005403:Fixation, Ocular; D005584:Fovea Centralis / Q000502:physiology*; D007839:Functional Laterality; D006801:Humans; D016013:Likelihood Functions; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological; D010470:Perceptual Masking; D011930:Reaction Time; D011932:Reading; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012044:Regression Analysis; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D014794:Visual Fields; D014796:Visual Perception