Aspects of repetition in bonobo-human conversation: creating cohesion in a conversation between species.
Ape language research has primarily focused on specific isolated language features. In contrast, in research into human language, traditions such as conversational analysis and discourse analysis propose to study language as actual discourse. Consequently, repetitions are seen as accomplishing various discursive and pragmatic functions in human conversations, while in apes, repetitions are seen as rote imitations and as proof that apes do not exhibit language. Tools from discourse analysis are applied in this study to a conversation between a language-competent bonobo, Pan paniscus and a human. The hypothesis is that the bonobo may exhibit even larger linguistic competency in ordinary conversation than in controlled experimental settings. Despite her limited productive means, the bonobo Panbanisha competently engages in co-constructing the conversational turns. She uses shared knowledge and repetitions to achieve compliance with a request. This reveals a knowledge about socio-linguistic interactions which goes beyond the pure informational content of words.
Pedersen
Janni
J
Department of Anthropology, Department of Philosophy, Iowa State University, Ames, IA 50010, USA. jannip@iastate.edu
Fields
William M
WM
D000819:Animal Communication; D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D005260:Female; D001841:Human-Animal Bond; D006801:Humans; D007100:Imitative Behavior; D007802:Language; D008297:Male; D009633:Nonverbal Communication; D019974:Pan paniscus; D013045:Species Specificity