Matching auditory and visual signals: is sensory modality just another feature?
In order to perceive the world coherently, we need to integrate features of objects and events that are presented to our senses. Here we investigated the temporal limit of integration in unimodal visual and auditory as well as crossmodal auditory-visual conditions. Participants were presented with alternating visual and auditory stimuli and were asked to match them either within or between modalities. At alternation rates of about 4 Hz and higher, participants were no longer able to match visual and auditory stimuli across modalities correctly, while matching within either modality showed higher temporal limits. Manipulating different temporal stimulus characteristics (stimulus offsets and/or auditory-visual SOAs) did not change performance. Interestingly, the difference in temporal limits between crossmodal and unimodal conditions appears strikingly similar to temporal limit differences between unimodal conditions when additional features have to be integrated. We suggest that adding a modality across which sensory input is integrated has the same effect as adding an extra feature to be integrated within a single modality.
Benjamins
Jeroen S
JS
Experimental Psychology Division, Helmholtz Institute, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 2, NL-3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.
van der Smagt
Maarten J
MJ
Verstraten
Frans A J
FA
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation / Q000379:methods*; D001307:Auditory Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D001309:Auditory Threshold / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D010470:Perceptual Masking / Q000502:physiology; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods*; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*