title: Are expert penmen better than lay people at producing simulations of a model signature?
abstract: Although forensic signature examination is considered to be an identification science, it is a theoretical possibility that an individual may learn to forge another person's signature that is free from indications of simulation behaviours. This proposition was tested in a signature blind trial that was administered to 42 forensic handwriting examiners (FHEs). Participants expressed opinions on the authorship of 100 questioned signatures. The questioned signatures comprised a mixture of genuine, disguised and simulated signatures. Calligraphers formed part of the population of individuals who provided simulated signatures for the trial. A total of 3100 opinions were expressed of which 1254 were correct, 224 misleading and 1622 were inconclusive. Of the opinions expressed regarding the simulated signatures, the misleading score for the calligraphers' forgeries were approximately four times that of the lay persons' forgeries. These results provide strong evidence in support of the proposition that calligraphers are more skilled at simulating signatures than are lay people and can produce forgeries that some FHEs have difficulty detecting.
authors.affiliation: Victoria Police Forensic Services Department, Document Examination Unit, Digital and Documents Evidence Branch, Macleod, Victoria, Australia.
authors.forename: Tahnee
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Dewhurst
authors.forename: Bryan
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Found
authors.forename: Doug
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Rogers
mesh_terms: D008192:Deception; D005554:Forensic Medicine; D006236:Handwriting; D006801:Humans; D011361:Professional Competence