Detection of 3D atomic similarities and their use in the discrimination of small molecule protein-binding sites.
BACKGROUND
Current computational methods for the prediction of function from structure are restricted to the detection of similarities and subsequent transfer of functional annotation. In a significant minority of cases, global sequence or structural (fold) similarities do not provide clues about protein function. In these cases, one alternative is to detect local binding site similarities. These may still reflect more distant evolutionary relationships as well as unique physico-chemical constraints necessary for binding similar ligands, thus helping pinpoint the function. In the present work, we ask the following question: is it possible to discriminate within a dataset of non-homologous proteins those that bind similar ligands based on their binding site similarities?


METHODS
We implement a graph-matching-based method for the detection of 3D atomic similarities introducing some simplifications that allow us to extend its applicability to the analysis of large allatom binding site models. This method, called IsoCleft, does not require atoms to be connected either in sequence or space. We apply the method to a cognate-ligand bound dataset of non-homologous proteins. We define a family of binding site models with decreasing knowledge about the identity of the ligand-interacting atoms to uncouple the questions of predicting the location of the binding site and detecting binding site similarities. Furthermore, we calculate the individual contributions of binding site size, chemical composition and geometry to prediction performance.


RESULTS
We find that it is possible to discriminate between different ligand-binding sites. In other words, there is a certain uniqueness in the set of atoms that are in contact to specific ligand scaffolds. This uniqueness is restricted to the atoms in close proximity of the ligand in which case, size and chemical composition alone are sufficient to discriminate binding sites. Discrimination ability decreases with decreasing knowledge about the identity of the ligand-interacting binding site atoms. The decrease is quite abrupt when considering size and chemical composition alone, but much slower when including geometry. We also observe that certain ligands are easier to discriminate. Interestingly, the subset of binding site atoms belonging to highly conserved residues is not sufficient to discriminate binding sites, implying that convergently evolved binding sites arrived at dissimilar solutions.


BACKGROUND
IsoCleft can be obtained from the authors.
Najmanovich
Rafael
R
European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK. rafael.najmanovich@ebi.ac.uk
Kurbatova
Natalja
N
Thornton
Janet
J
D000465:Algorithms; D000595:Amino Acid Sequence; D001665:Binding Sites; D003198:Computer Simulation; D016002:Discriminant Analysis; D008956:Models, Chemical; D008958:Models, Molecular; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D011485:Protein Binding; D011487:Protein Conformation; D011506:Proteins / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000648:ultrastructure*; D016415:Sequence Alignment / Q000379:methods*; D020539:Sequence Analysis, Protein / Q000379:methods*; D017385:Sequence Homology
D011506:Proteins