Is Z division of the Achilles tendon always necessary in wide exposure of the back of the distal tibia and ankle joint? Report of a preliminary investigation.
BACKGROUND
In posterior approach to the back of tibia and ankle, mere retraction of the Achilles tendon can expose the operation site but when this exposure is not enough, Z division of the Achilles tendon is recommended in literature. The main objective of the study is to find out if Z division of the Achilles tendon is always necessary in posterior approach to the back of tibia and ankle for direct vision of the back of distal tibia, exploration of bones and joints of the posterior aspect of the ankle joint.


METHODS
From 15/12/1997 to 30/12/2006 sixteen patients required surgical management of distal tibia fractures involving articular surfaces. Posterior approach with Achilles tendon division was indicated for satisfactory access to the back of tibia and ankle. In equal number of these patients division of the Achilles tendon was either by Z or longitudinal divisions. Intra and post operative assessment of both types of Achilles tendon division was done.


RESULTS
Longitudinal division of the Achilles tendon had advantages and should be preferred. Operation time, period of post- operative pain and cast immobilization were brief. There was full range of motion of the ankle joint after removal of cast.


CONCLUSIONS
When division of the Achilles tendon is indicated for direct vision of the posterior aspect of the distal of tibia and ankle joint, Z division is not necessary. A good knowledge of anatomy and experience makes the procedure easier and quicker.
Musa
Abdullahi Agaba-Idu
AA
Department of Surgery, Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria. agabamusa@yahoo.com
D000125:Achilles Tendon / Q000601:surgery*; D000328:Adult; D000843:Ankle Joint / Q000033:anatomy & histology; D006801:Humans; D007103:Immobilization; D008297:Male; D019637:Orthopedic Procedures; D013977:Tibia / Q000033:anatomy & histology