A comparison of the Psychological Entitlement Scale and the Narcissistic Personality Inventory's Entitlement Scale: relations with general personality traits and personality disorders.
Given the negative consequences of psychological entitlement, it is important to have a reliable and valid measure of the construct. We used an undergraduate sample (N = 271) to examine the Entitlement subscale (ENT) of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory (Raskin & Terry, 1988) and the Psychological Entitlement Scale (PES; Campbell, Bonacci, Shelton, Exline, & Bushman, 2004) in relation to general personality traits (i.e., Revised NEO Personality Inventory; Costa & McCrae, 1992) and personality disorders (PDs; Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire-4; Hyler, 1994). We found similar personality correlates (e.g., disagreeableness; Cluster B PDs) for both measures, although ENT was comprised of greater disagreeableness and less warmth and positive affect. ENT was also more positively associated with schizoid and borderline PDs compared to the PES. Overall, these measures are closely related with regard to their relations with general and pathological personality dimensions, although the ENT scale may capture a slightly more pathological variant.
Pryor
Lauren R
LR
Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-3013, USA.
Miller
Joshua D
JD
Gaughan
Eric T
ET
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D005260:Female; D005845:Georgia; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009289:Narcissism; D010554:Personality Disorders / Q000523:psychology*; D010555:Personality Inventory / Q000592:standards*; D011594:Psychometrics