title: Limited utilities of N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide and other newer risk markers compared with traditional risk factors for prediction of significant angiographic lesions in stable coronary artery disease.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To investigate the usefulness of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) as a predictive marker for angiographically significant coronary artery disease (CAD) and CAD severity compared with other newer biochemical risk markers and classic risk factors in patients with clinically suspected CAD.
  
  
  METHODS
  Cross-sectional evaluation of NT-proBNP in a large consecutive series of patients without a history of myocardial infarction referred for elective coronary angiography (CAG) between March 2004 and January 2005. The value of NT-proBNP for predicting CAD was assessed and compared with high sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) and traditional risk factors.
  
  
  METHODS
  Tertiary care centre, Department of Cardiology, Innsbruck Medical University, Austria.
  
  
  METHODS
  561 men and 287 women aged between 20-86 years (median 65 years).
  
  
  METHODS
  None.
  
  
  METHODS
  Association of NT-proBNP with the severity of CAD, left ventricular dysfunction and comparison of predictive values of NT-proBNP, hs-CRP, GGT and traditional CAD risk factors.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of all tested newer biochemical risk markers NT-proBNP performed best. In a multinomial logistic regression model NT-proBNP but not hs-CRP or GGT was significantly associated with three-vessel CAD adjusted for age, sex, ventricular, renal function and classic risk factors (odds ratio = 1.667; 95% CI 1.003 to 2.772; p = 0.049). However, NT-proBNP had no additive predictive value to traditional cardiovascular risk factors for the prediction of angiographically significant CAD in a binary logistic regression model.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The predictive value of NT-proBNP for CAD severity is better than that of hs-CRP or GGT. However, NT-proBNP is also of limited value compared with traditional risk factors for predicting significant CAD.
authors: Universitaetsklinik für Innere Medizin III-Kardiologie, Innsbruck Medical University, Anichstrasse 35, Innsbruck, Austria.
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Peer
authors: G
authors: G
authors: Falkensammer
authors: H
authors: H
authors: Alber
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Kroiss
authors: A
authors: A
authors: Griesmacher
authors: H
authors: H
authors: Ulmer
authors: O
authors: O
authors: Pachinger
authors: J
authors: J
authors: Mair
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D015415:Biomarkers / Q000097:blood; D002097:C-Reactive Protein / Q000032:analysis; D017023:Coronary Angiography; D003324:Coronary Artery Disease / Q000097:blood* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D020097:Natriuretic Peptide, Brain / Q000097:blood*; D010446:Peptide Fragments / Q000097:blood*; D012307:Risk Factors; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D055815:Young Adult; D005723:gamma-Glutamyltransferase / Q000097:blood
chemical_list: D015415:Biomarkers; D010446:Peptide Fragments; C109794:pro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76); D020097:Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; D002097:C-Reactive Protein; D005723:gamma-Glutamyltransferase