title: Coordination success and interpersonal perceptions: matching versus mismatching.
abstract: Coordination is an essential part of social functioning. The authors distinguish 2 types of coordination: matching and mismatching. In matching, coordination is successful if parties choose the same action. In mismatching, coordination is successful if people choose different actions. In 3 studies, the authors investigated the downstream social consequences of tacit coordination for interpersonal perceptions. In all studies, participants repeatedly choose between 2 bets with equivalent expected values, and payoffs increased either when they choose the same bet or when they choose different bets. In the 1st 2 studies, coordination success increased the perceptions of interpersonal similarity and liking when matching was required but not when mismatching was required. The authors' interpretation is that matching responses and coordination success had countervailing effects in the mismatching task. Also, percentage of matched responses did not affect perceptions when coordination was not required (Experiment 2). In 4 person teams, a frequently matching partner was viewed more favorably (smarter, more similar to self, and more liked) than were other teammates, even when mismatching increased payoffs (Experiment 3).
authors: Department of Psychology, Miami University, Oxford, Ohio 45056, USA. abeles@muohio.edu
authors: Susanne
authors: S
authors: Abele
authors: Garold
authors: G
authors: Stasser
mesh_terms: D000339:Affect; D003220:Conflict, Psychological; D003299:Cooperative Behavior; D003469:Culture; D003657:Decision Making; D005715:Gambling / Q000523:psychology; D005716:Game Theory; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D009042:Motivation; D011340:Problem Solving; D012919:Social Behavior; D012928:Social Desirability; D012938:Social Perception