Variable size computer-aided detection prompts and mammography film reader decisions.
BACKGROUND
The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of computer-aided detection (CAD) prompts on reader behaviour in a large sample of breast screening mammograms by analysing the relationship of the presence and size of prompts to the recall decision.


METHODS
Local research ethics committee approval was obtained; informed consent was not required. Mammograms were obtained from women attending routine mammography at two breast screening centres in 1996. Films, previously double read, were re-read by a different reader using CAD. The study material included 315 cancer cases comprising all screen-detected cancer cases, all subsequent interval cancers and 861 normal cases randomly selected from 10,267 cases. Ground truth data were used to assess the efficacy of CAD prompting. Associations between prompt attributes and tumour features or reader recall decisions were assessed by chi-squared tests.


RESULTS
There was a highly significant relationship between prompting and a decision to recall for cancer cases and for a random sample of normal cases (P < 0.001). Sixty-four per cent of all cases contained at least one CAD prompt. In cancer cases, larger prompts were more likely to be recalled (P = 0.02) for masses but there was no such association for calcifications (P = 0.9). In a random sample of 861 normal cases, larger prompts were more likely to be recalled (P = 0.02) for both mass and calcification prompts. Significant associations were observed with prompting and breast density (p = 0.009) for cancer cases but not for normal cases (P = 0.05).


CONCLUSIONS
For both normal cases and cancer cases, prompted mammograms were more likely to be recalled and the prompt size was also associated with a recall decision.
Gilbert
Fiona J
FJ
Division of Applied Medicine, School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Aberdeen, Lilian Sutton Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK. f.j.gilbert@abdn.ac.uk
Astley
Susan M
SM
Boggis
Caroline Rm
CR
McGee
Magnus A
MA
Griffiths
Pamela M
PM
Duffy
Stephen W
SW
Agbaje
Olorunsola F
OF
Gillan
Maureen Gc
MG
Wilson
Mary
M
Jain
Anil K
AK
Barr
Nicola
N
Beetles
Ursula M
UM
Griffiths
Miriam A
MA
Johnson
Jill
J
Roberts
Rita M
RM
Deans
Heather E
HE
Duncan
Karen A
KA
Iyengar
Geeta
G
D000368:Aged; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology; D003201:Computers; D003936:Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D055088:Early Detection of Cancer; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008327:Mammography / Q000379:methods*; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000379:methods; D008875:Middle Aged; D015588:Observer Variation; D011857:Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012107:Research Design; D016896:Treatment Outcome