The evolving organizational structure of academic health centers: the case of the University of Florida.
The organizational structures of academic health centers (AHCs) vary widely, but they all exist along a continuum of integration--that is, the degree to which the academic and clinical missions operate under a single administrative and governance structure. This author provides a brief overview of the topic of AHC integration, including the pros and cons of more integrated or less integrated models. He then traces the evolution of the University of Florida (UF) Health Science Center, which was created in the 1950s as a fully integrated AHC and which now operates under a more distributed management and governance model. Starting as a completely integrated AHC, UF's Health Science Center reached a time of maximal nonintegration (or dys-integration) in the late 1990s and at the beginning of this decade. Circumstances are now pushing the expanding clinical and academic enterprises to be more together as they face the challenges of market competition, federal research budget constraints, and reengineering clinical operations to reduce costs, enhance access, and improve quality and patient safety. Although formal organizational integration may not be possible or appropriate for any number of legal or political reasons, the author suggests that AHCs should strive for "functional integration" to be successful in the current turbulent environment.
Barrett
Douglas J
DJ
University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32610-0014, USA. dbarrett@ufl.edu
D000046:Academic Medical Centers / Q000458:organization & administration*; D016390:Allied Health Occupations / Q000193:education; D004506:Education, Nursing; D004520:Education, Veterinary; D005431:Florida; D006801:Humans; D017146:Models, Organizational; D009936:Organizational Innovation; D009937:Organizational Objectives