Occupational physicians' perceived value of evidence-based medicine intervention in enhancing their professional performance.
OBJECTIVE
This study evaluated how physicians in a nonclinical setting perceive the value of an intervention with multifaceted evidence-based medicine with regard to enhancing their professional performance.


METHODS
A qualitative study was conducted using focus groups and face-to-face interviews with 14 of the 48 Dutch occupational physicians who participated in the intervention. The intervention combined a didactic course in evidence-based medicine with recurrent case-method learning sessions. During the sessions, the participants were challenged to discuss their cases and to give one another feedback on how to find information on cases.


RESULTS
Five main themes and four subthemes were identified: professional behavior and quality of care (subtheme: transparency): occupational physicians associated being up-to-date with quality of care, and evidence-based medicine was associated with improvements in professional standards; critical attitude and improved recommendations: occupational physicians asked themselves more-profound questions and searched more for information; sharing knowledge: the peer-group sessions facilitated the sharing of knowledge; communication (subthemes: colleagues, clients and other specialists): the more soundly based recommendations enhanced self-confidence positively and therefore altered interaction with medical specialists in particular; and satisfaction and barriers: the occupational physicians were especially content with the structured discussion in the peer-group sessions. However, the intervention was very time consuming.


CONCLUSIONS
The participants regarded the intervention as a useful method for enhancing their professional performance. They stated that they became more up-to-date and more self-confident by searching for and sharing knowledge. These actions resulted in more scientifically based recommendations and improved interaction with clients and other specialists. However, time constraints remain an important barrier.
Hugenholtz
Nathalie I R
NI
Coronel Institute of Occupational Health, Academic Medical Center, PO Box 22700, NL-1100 DE Amsterdam, Netherlands. n.i.hugenholtz@amc.uva.nl
Schaafsma
Frederieke G
FG
Schreinemakers
Jos F
JF
van Dijk
Frank J H
FJ
Nieuwenhuijsen
Karen
K
D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D003142:Communication; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine / Q000193:education*; D006801:Humans; D009786:Occupational Health Services / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D009787:Occupational Medicine / Q000193:education / Q000592:standards*; D010820:Physicians / Q000523:psychology*; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians'; D011361:Professional Competence; D036301:Qualitative Research; D011787:Quality of Health Care; D012050:Rehabilitation, Vocational