Questionable hospital chart documentation practices by physicians.
BACKGROUND
Physicians, influenced by various pressures, may document information in patient records that they did not personally observe.


OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the hospital chart documentation practices of internists and internal medicine sub-specialists in the Northeastern United States.


METHODS
An anonymous mail survey questionnaire.


METHODS
One thousand one hundred twenty-six randomly selected internists and internal medicine sub-specialists.


METHODS
Responses to questions describing their own hospital chart documentation practices, those they observed among their colleagues, and ratings of the importance of possible influences.


RESULTS
Response rate was 43%. Fifty-nine percent (59%) of physicians reported personally engaging in one or more of six questionable documentation scenarios. Forty percent (40%, CI; 37%-43%) indicated that they recorded laboratory notes in patient records based on information that they did not personally obtain, while 6% (CI; 5%-8%) admitted to writing notes on patients not personally seen or examined. The corresponding percentages reported for their colleagues were 52% (CI; 49%-56%) and 22% (CI; 20%-25%), respectively. Increased rates of documentation lapses were significantly associated with working directly with residents and/or fellows (OR = 1.71, CI; 1.30-2.25), younger age (OR for 10 year age decrease = 1.35, CI; 1.19-1.53), white race (OR = 1.47, CI; 1.08-2.00), and graduation from US medical schools (OR = 1.75, CI; 1.31-2.34).


CONCLUSIONS
Most physicians report having engaged in questionable hospital chart documentation. This practice is more common among physicians who are younger, working with house staff, and graduates of US medical schools.
Sharma
Ranita
R
UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08903-0019, USA. sharmar1@umdnj.edu
Kostis
William J
WJ
Wilson
Alan C
AC
Cosgrove
Nora M
NM
Hassett
Afton L
AL
Moreyra
Abel E
AE
Delnevo
Cristine D
CD
Kostis
John B
JB