[Epidural analgesia in obstetrics: anaesthesiologists practice in Auvergne].
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the practice of labour epidural analgesia in Auvergne.


METHODS
Cross-sectional study by a mail survey.


METHODS
An anonymous postal questionnaire was sent to all anaesthetists working in public or private hospital having a maternity unit.


RESULTS
The response rate was 82%. Eighty-eight percent of the respondents practise epidural analgesia in obstetrics (EAO) for labour pain relief, but 49% of them did so only on call. Fifty percent of the respondents ask for platelets and fibrinogen beforehand and 41% accept a one month validity for these tests. One third uses a full aseptic method (surgical hand washing, cap and face mask, sterile gloves and gown, double disinfection of patient's back). Nearly all respondents practice skin anaesthesia, 67% use saline solution for identification of the epidural space, 58% insert the catheter 4cm into the epidural space and 25% use a lidocaine-epinephrine epidural test dose. The analgesic solution is mostly based on ropivacaine (83%) associated with sufentanil (96%); patient controlled epidural analgesia rate is used by 58% of anaesthetists whereas 37% of them never use epidural clonidine and 52% never practice combined spinal epidural (CSE) analgesia during labour.


CONCLUSIONS
EAO is mainly practiced on call. There are too many laboratory tests ordered before EAO. Technique used to insert epidural catheter is partly uniform and ropivacaine with sufentanil is the analgesic solution most often used. CSE for labour analgesia is still not often used.
Page
J-P
JP
Pôle d'anesthésie-réanimation, polyclinique, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Hôtel-dieu, 63001 Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Bonnin
M
M
Bolandard
F
F
Vernis
L
L
Lavergne
B
B
Baud
O
O
Bazin
J-E
JE
Vendittelli
F
F