title: Biolimus-eluting stent with biodegradable polymer versus sirolimus-eluting stent with durable polymer for coronary revascularisation (LEADERS): a randomised non-inferiority trial.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  A novel stent platform eluting biolimus, a sirolimus analogue, from a biodegradable polymer showed promising results in preliminary studies. We compared the safety and efficacy of a biolimus-eluting stent (with biodegradable polymer) with a sirolimus-eluting stent (with durable polymer).
  
  
  METHODS
  We undertook a multicentre, assessor-blind, non-inferiority study in ten European centres. 1707 patients aged 18 years or older with chronic stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes were centrally randomised by a computer-generated allocation sequence to treatment with either biolimus-eluting (n=857) or sirolimus-eluting (n=850) stents. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, or clinically-indicated target vessel revascularisation within 9 months. Analysis was by intention to treat. 427 patients were randomly allocated to angiographic follow-up, with in-stent percentage diameter stenosis as principal outcome measure at 9 months. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00389220.
  
  
  RESULTS
  We analysed all randomised patients. Biolimus-eluting stents were non-inferior to sirolimus-eluting stents for the primary endpoint at 9 months (79 [9%] patients vs 89 [11%], rate ratio 0.88 [95% CI 0.64-1.19], p for non-inferiority=0.003, p for superiority=0.39). Frequency of cardiac death (14 [1.6%] vs 21 [2.5%], p for superiority=0.22), myocardial infarction (49 [5.7%] vs 39 [4.6%], p=0.30), and clinically-indicated target vessel revascularisation (38 [4.4%] vs 47 [5.5%], p=0.29) were similar for both stent types. 168 (79%) patients in the biolimus-eluting group and 167 (78%) in the sirolimus-eluting group had data for angiographic follow-up available. Biolimus-eluting stents were non-inferior to sirolimus-eluting stents in in-stent percentage diameter stenosis (20.9%vs 23.3%, difference -2.2% [95% CI -6.0 to 1.6], p for non-inferiority=0.001, p for superiority=0.26).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Our results suggest that a stent eluting biolimus from a biodegradable polymer represents a safe and effective alternative to a stent eluting sirolimus from a durable polymer in patients with chronic stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes.
  
  
  BACKGROUND
  Biosensors Europe SA, Switzerland.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cardiology, and CTU Bern, Bern University Hospital, Bern, Switzerland. stephan.windecker@insel.ch
authors.forename: Stephan
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Windecker
authors.forename: Patrick W
authors.initials: PW
authors.lastname: Serruys
authors.forename: Simon
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Wandel
authors.forename: Pawel
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Buszman
authors.forename: Stanislaw
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Trznadel
authors.forename: Axel
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Linke
authors.forename: Karsten
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Lenk
authors.forename: Thomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Ischinger
authors.forename: Volker
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Klauss
authors.forename: Franz
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Eberli
authors.forename: Roberto
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Corti
authors.forename: William
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Wijns
authors.forename: Marie-Claude
authors.initials: MC
authors.lastname: Morice
authors.forename: Carlo
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: di Mario
authors.forename: Simon
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Davies
authors.forename: Robert-Jan
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: van Geuns
authors.forename: Pedro
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Eerdmans
authors.forename: Gerrit-Anne
authors.initials: GA
authors.lastname: van Es
authors.forename: Bernhard
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Meier
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Jüni