title: Attitudes after unintended injury during treatment a survey of doctors and patients.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare the attitudes of doctors and patients toward the disclosure of information after adverse medical events.
  
  
  METHODS
  Cross-sectional questionnaire survey.
  
  
  METHODS
  Ophthalmology department of an outer London hospital.
  
  
  METHODS
  246 patients attending one ophthalmic outpatient clinic during a 5-week period and 48 ophthalmologists.
  
  
  METHODS
  Proportion of each group who believed that patients should be informed about the occurrence of an adverse event and its potential future complications following elective ophthalmic surgery.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Most patients (226/246, 91.8%) believed that a patient should be informed of an adverse event. Fewer ophthalmologists (29/48, 60.5%, P<0.001; odds ratio 7.4 [95% CI 3.7-14.3]) shared this belief. The majority of patients (200/246, 88.5%) believed that a patient should be as fully informed as possible about the event and possible future complications, but this belief was shared by a minority of ophthalmologists (16/48, 33.3%, P<0.001; odds ratio 8.7 [95% CI 4.7-15.9]).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  After an adverse medical event, there is a discrepancy between the amount of information that patients wish to be given and that which physicians feel is appropriate.
authors.affiliation: Central Eye Unit, Central Middlesex Hospital, London, NW10 7NS, UK.
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hingorani
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Wong
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Vafidis