Clinico-pathological discrepancies in the diagnoses of solid malignancies.
Autopsy is a valuable tool in evaluating diagnostic accuracy. Solid malignancies may have a protracted presentation, and diagnosis frequently requires imaging and deep-sited biopsies; clinical and postmortem diagnosis discrepancies may occur in a high rate in these diseases. Here, we analyzed the occurrence of clinico-pathological discrepancies in the diagnoses of solid malignancies in a Brazilian academic hospital. We reviewed charts and autopsy reports of the patients that died from 2001 to 2003 with at least one solid neoplasm. Patients were classified in concordant and discordant cases regarding cancer diagnosis. Discordant cases were categorized in undiagnosed cases (no suspicion of cancer) and in misdiagnosed cases (clinical suspicion of cancer but incompletely diagnosed). Among the 264 patients with a single non-incidental solid neoplasm, the clinico-pathological discrepancy rate was 37.1%. Liver (22.5%), lung (19.4%), and pancreatic cancer (15.3%) were the most frequent malignancies in the discordant group. Misdiagnosis category comprised 68% of the discordant cases, i.e., there was no correct knowledge about the tumor primary site and/or the histological type during life. Our data show that a high rate of discrepancies occurs in solid malignancies. Autopsies may provide the basis for a better understanding of diagnostic deficiencies in different circumstances.
Grinberg
Lea Tenenholz
LT
Department of Pathology, Sao Paulo University Medical School, and Albert Einstein Research and Education Institute, Albert Einstein Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil. leagrinberg@usp.br
Ferraz da Silva
Luiz Fernando
LF
Galtarossa Xavier
Ana Carolina
AC
Nascimento Saldiva
Paulo Hilário
PH
Mauad
Thais
T