title: A practical method for analyzing factorial designs with heteroscedastic data.
abstract: The Type I error rates and powers of three recent tests for analyzing nonorthogonal factorial designs under departures from the assumptions of homogeneity and normality were evaluated using Monte Carlo simulation. Specifically, this work compared the performance of the modified Brown-Forsythe procedure, the generalization of Box's method proposed by Brunner, Dette, and Munk, and the mixed-model procedure adjusted by the Kenward-Roger solution available in the SAS statistical package. With regard to robustness, the three approaches adequately controlled Type I error when the data were generated from symmetric distributions; however, this study's results indicate that, when the data were extracted from asymmetric distributions, the modified Brown-Forsythe approach controlled the Type I error slightly better than the other procedures. With regard to sensitivity, the higher power rates were obtained when the analyses were done with the MIXED procedure of the SAS program. Furthermore, results also identified that, when the data were generated from symmetric distributions, little power was sacrificed by using the generalization of Box's method in place of the modified Brown-Forsythe procedure.
authors.affiliation: Deprtment of Psychology, University of Oviedo, Spain. gvallejo@uniovi.es
authors.forename: Guiillermo
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Vallejo
authors.forename: Manuel
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Ato
authors.forename: M Paula
authors.initials: MP
authors.lastname: Fernández
authors.forename: Pablo E
authors.initials: PE
authors.lastname: Livacic-Rojas