More is still not better: testing the perturbation model of temporal reference memory across different modalities and tasks.
The ability of the perturbation model (Jones & Wearden, 2003) to account for reference memory function in a visual temporal generalization task and auditory and visual reproduction tasks was examined. In all tasks the number of presentations of the standard was manipulated (1, 3, or 5), and its effect on performance was compared. In visual temporal generalization the number of presentations of the standard did not affect the number of times the standard was correctly identified, nor did it affect the overall temporal generalization gradient. In auditory reproduction there was no effect of the number of times the standard was presented on mean reproductions. In visual reproduction mean reproductions were shorter when the standard was only presented once; however, this effect was reduced when a visual cue was provided before the first presentation of the standard. Whilst the results of all experiments are best accounted for by the perturbation model there appears to be some attentional benefit to multiple presentations of the standard in visual reproduction.
Ogden
Ruth S
RS
School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK. Ruth.Ogden@postgrad.manchester.ac.uk
Jones
Luke A
LA
D001245:Association Learning; D001288:Attention; D003657:Decision Making; D005795:Generalization, Stimulus; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008570:Memory, Short-Term; D011939:Mental Recall; D008960:Models, Psychological; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D010898:Pitch Perception; D011214:Practice, Psychological; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D013998:Time Perception