Long-term retention explained by a model of short-term learning in the adaptive control of reaching.
Extensive theoretical, psychophysical, and neurobiological work has focused on the mechanisms by which short-term learning develops into long-term memory. Better understanding of these mechanisms may lead to the ability to improve the efficiency of training procedures. A key phenomenon in the formation of long-term memory is the effect of over learning on retention-discovered by Ebbinghaus in 1885: when the initial training period in a task is prolonged even beyond what is necessary for good immediate recall, long-term retention improves. Although this over learning effect has received considerable attention as a phenomenon in psychology research, the mechanisms governing this process are not well understood, and the ability to predict the benefit conveyed by varying degrees of over learning does not yet exist. Here we studied the relationship between the duration of an initial training period and the amount of retention 24 h later for the adaptation of human reaching arm movements to a novel force environment. We show that in this motor adaptation task, the amount of long-term retention is predicted not by the overall performance level achieved during the training period but rather by the level of a specific component process in a multi-rate model of short-term memory formation. These findings indicate that while multiple learning processes determine the ability to learn a motor adaptation, only one provides a gateway to long-term memory formation. Understanding the dynamics of this key learning process may allow for the rational design of training and rehabilitation paradigms that maximize the long-term benefit of each session.
Joiner
Wilsaan M
WM
Laboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Smith
Maurice A
MA
D000222:Adaptation, Physiological / Q000502:physiology*; D000328:Adult; D001132:Arm / Q000502:physiology; D003198:Computer Simulation; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D008954:Models, Biological; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology*; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology; D012153:Retention, Psychology; D013997:Time Factors
Trends Neurosci. 2006 Jan;29(1):58-64
16290273
Exp Brain Res. 2001 Sep;140(1):66-76
11500799
Science. 1997 Aug 8;277(5327):821-5
9242612
J Neurosci. 1997 Jan 1;17(1):409-19
8987766
Science. 1962 Feb 23;135(3504):666-7
14037399
J Neurophysiol. 2000 Aug;84(2):853-62
10938312
J Neurosci. 2000 Dec 1;20(23):8916-24
11102502
Res Q. 1971 Mar;42(1):60-9
5279070
PLoS Biol. 2006 Jun;4(6):e179
16700627
Biol Cybern. 1999 Jul;81(1):39-60
10434390
Learn Mem. 2005 Jul-Aug;12(4):433-43
16077021
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Feb;91(2):924-33
14523069
Exp Brain Res. 2001 Nov;141(2):250-3
11713636
J Mot Behav. 1972 Sep;4(3):187-93
23952596
Neuron. 2007 Apr 19;54(2):319-33
17442251
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Aug;86(2):971-85
11495965
Science. 1972 Jan 28;175(4020):451-4
17731371
J Neurosci. 2006 Nov 15;26(46):11888-92
17108162
J Neurosci. 2004 Nov 3;24(44):9971-6
15525782
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Mar;97(3):2107-20
17202232
J Physiol. 1977 Sep;270(2):321-44
409838
J Neurosci. 1994 May;14(5 Pt 2):3208-24
8182467
J Neurosci. 2006 Nov 29;26(48):12466-70
17135408
J Neurophysiol. 1987 Oct;58(4):883-907
3681400
J Neurosci. 2003 Oct 8;23(27):9032-45
14534237
Nature. 1996 Jul 18;382(6588):252-5
8717039
Behav Brain Res. 1990 Feb 12;37(1):89-92
2310497
Nat Neurosci. 1999 Nov;2(11):1026-31
10526344
Trends Neurosci. 1995 May;18(5):212-8
7610491
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Jun;10(6):779-86
17496891
Nature. 2000 Oct 12;407(6805):742-7
11048720
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Sep;96(3):1030-41
16672299