title: Rapid aneuploidy detection with multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification: a prospective study of 4000 amniotic fluid samples.
abstract: The introduction of prenatal screening requires rapid high-throughput diagnosis of common aneuploidies. Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) allows for quick, easily automated multiplex testing of these aneuploidies in one polymerase chain reaction. We performed a large prospective study using MLPA on 4000 amniotic fluid (AF) samples including all indications and compared its value to karyotyping and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). MLPA can reliably determine common aneuploidies with 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Moreover, some mosaic cases and structural chromosome aberrations were detected as well. In cases of a male fetus, triploidies can be detected by an aberrant pattern of probe signals, which mimics maternal cell contamination (MCC). Macroscopic blood contamination was encountered in 3.2% of the AF samples. In 20% of these samples, an MLPA pattern was found consistent with MCC, although there were no false negatives of the most common aneuploidies. As the vast majority of inconclusive results (1.7%) is due to potential MCC, we designed a protocol in which we determine whether MLPA can be performed on blood-contaminated AF samples by testing if blood is of fetal origin. Then, the number of inconclusive results could be theoretically reduced to 0.05%. We propose an alternative interpretation of relative probe signals for rapid aneuploidy diagnosis (RAD). We discuss the value of MLPA for the detection of (submicroscopic) structural chromosome anomalies. MLPA is a reliable method that can replace FISH and could be used as a stand-alone test for RAD instead of karyotyping.
authors.affiliation: Department of Clinical Genetics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
authors.forename: Diane
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Van Opstal
authors.forename: Marjan
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Boter
authors.forename: Danielle
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: de Jong
authors.forename: Cardi
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: van den Berg
authors.forename: Hennie T
authors.initials: HT
authors.lastname: Brüggenwirth
authors.forename: Hajo I J
authors.initials: HI
authors.lastname: Wildschut
authors.forename: Annelies
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: de Klein
authors.forename: Robert-Jan H
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Galjaard
mesh_terms: D000649:Amniocentesis / Q000379:methods; D000653:Amniotic Fluid; D000782:Aneuploidy; D005188:False Negative Reactions; D005260:Female; D005820:Genetic Testing / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D017404:In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence; D007621:Karyotyping; D008297:Male; D015336:Molecular Probe Techniques; D009030:Mosaicism; D021141:Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques / Q000379:methods*; D011247:Pregnancy; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014314:Trisomy / Q000175:diagnosis
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Jun 15;30(12):e57
references.pmid: 12060695
references.citation: J Med Genet. 2005 Jan;42(1):38-44
references.pmid: 15635073
references.citation: Prenat Diagn. 2003 Mar;23(3):201-10
references.pmid: 12627420
references.citation: Prenat Diagn. 2005 Nov;25(11):1032-9
references.pmid: 16231311
references.citation: Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2007 Feb 15;145C(1):87-98
references.pmid: 17290441
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 1977 Jan;29(1):94-7
references.pmid: 835578
references.citation: Lancet. 1993 Sep 25;342(8874):802
references.pmid: 8103886
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2007 Apr;22(4):1037-41
references.pmid: 17272360
references.citation: Prenat Diagn. 2005 Jan;25(1):79-83
references.pmid: 15662689
references.citation: Reproduction. 2003 Sep;126(3):279-97
references.pmid: 12968936
references.citation: J Med Genet. 2003 Dec;40(12):907-12
references.pmid: 14684689
references.citation: BJOG. 2005 Oct;112(10):1369-75
references.pmid: 16167939
references.citation: Clin Chem. 1995 Dec;41(12 Pt 1):1778-80
references.pmid: 7497623
references.citation: Am J Med Genet. 1983 Jun;15(2):297-305
references.pmid: 6349361
references.citation: Prenat Diagn. 2002 Jan;22(1):29-33
references.pmid: 11810646
references.citation: Prenat Diagn. 1996 Jan;16(1):49-54
references.pmid: 8821852
references.citation: Eur J Hum Genet. 2004 Nov;12(11):907-15
references.pmid: 15292918
references.citation: Eur J Hum Genet. 2005 Feb;13(2):171-5
references.pmid: 15483643
references.citation: Lancet. 2005 Jul 9-15;366(9480):97-8
references.pmid: 16005312
references.citation: Prenat Diagn. 1995 Aug;15(8):705-11
references.pmid: 7479588
references.citation: Prenat Diagn. 2001 Feb;21(2):75-80
references.pmid: 11241529
references.citation: Ann Genet. 2001 Oct-Dec;44(4):209-17
references.pmid: 11755107
references.citation: Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Sep;30(3):247-51
references.pmid: 17721912
references.citation: BMJ. 2006 Feb 25;332(7539):452-5
references.pmid: 16476673
references.citation: Lancet. 2005 Jul 9-15;366(9480):123-8
references.pmid: 16005334
references.citation: Mol Hum Reprod. 2004 Nov;10(11):839-46
references.pmid: 15361554
references.citation: Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Oct;92(4 Pt 1):551-6
references.pmid: 9764627
references.citation: Health Technol Assess. 2003;7(10):1-146
references.pmid: 12773259