title: Cognitive apprenticeship in clinical practice: can it stimulate learning in the opinion of students?
abstract: Learning in clinical practice can be characterised as situated learning because students learn by performing tasks and solving problems in an environment that reflects the multiple ways in which their knowledge will be put to use in their future professional practice. Collins et al. introduced cognitive apprenticeship as an instructional model for situated learning comprising six teaching methods to support learning: modelling, coaching, scaffolding, articulation, reflection and exploration. Another factor that is looked upon as conducive to learning in clinical practice is a positive learning climate. We explored students' experiences regarding the learning climate and whether the cognitive apprenticeship model fits students' experiences during clinical training. In focus group interviews, three groups of 6th-year medical students (N = 21) discussed vignettes representing the six teaching methods and the learning climate to explore the perceived occurrence of the teaching methods, related problems and possibilities for improvement. The students had experienced all six teaching methods during their clerkships. Modelling, coaching, and articulation were predominant, while scaffolding, reflection, and exploration were mainly experienced during longer clerkships and with one clinical teacher. The main problem was variability in usage of the methods, which was attributed to teachers' lack of time and formal training. The students proposed several ways to improve the application of the teaching methods. The results suggest that the cognitive apprenticeship model is a useful model for teaching strategies in undergraduate clinical training and a valuable basis for evaluation, feedback, self-assessment and faculty development of clinical teachers.
authors.affiliation: Department of Educational Development and Research, Faculty of Health, Medicine, and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, P.O. Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. r.stalmeijer@educ.unimaas.nl
authors.forename: Renée E
authors.initials: RE
authors.lastname: Stalmeijer
authors.forename: Diana H J M
authors.initials: DH
authors.lastname: Dolmans
authors.forename: Ineke H A P
authors.initials: IH
authors.lastname: Wolfhagen
authors.forename: Albert J J A
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Scherpbier
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002983:Clinical Competence; D003071:Cognition; D003072:Cognition Disorders; D003479:Curriculum; D017144:Focus Groups; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D007858:Learning; D017145:Models, Educational; D009426:Netherlands; D012938:Social Perception; D013337:Students, Medical; D013663:Teaching
references.citation: Med Educ. 2002 Nov;36(11):1042-9
references.pmid: 12406264
references.citation: Med Educ. 2005 Jul;39(7):742-50
references.pmid: 15960795
references.citation: Nurse Educ. 1999 Jul-Aug;24(4):31-6
references.pmid: 10647388
references.citation: Acad Med. 1998 Jun;73(6):688-95
references.pmid: 9653408
references.citation: Acad Med. 2002 Apr;77(4):332-5
references.pmid: 11953302
references.citation: Med Educ. 2000 Oct;34(10):827-40
references.pmid: 11012933
references.citation: Acad Med. 2008 Aug;83(8):768-74
references.pmid: 18667894
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2007 Jan 25;356(4):387-96
references.pmid: 17251535
references.citation: Med Educ. 2008 Jul;42(7):729-32
references.pmid: 18588652
references.citation: BMJ. 2003 Mar 15;326(7389):591-4
references.pmid: 12637408
references.citation: Med Teach. 2003 Mar;25(2):131-5
references.pmid: 12745519