title: Embodied relations are encoded in language.
abstract: Studies of embodied cognition have shown that comprehenders process iconic word pairs (attic-basement) more quickly than reverse-iconic pairs (basement-attic) when the pairs are presented to them in a vertical spatial arrangement. This effect disappears in a horizontal spatial arrangement. This has been claimed to show that comprehenders perceptually simulate these word pairs. A complementary explanation is that linguistic conceptualizations (word order) reflect prelinguistic conceptualizations (spatial iconicity), whereby comprehenders use these linguistic conceptualizations in the comprehension process. The results of corpus linguistic, rating, and semantic judgment studies reported here supported this explanation: Iconic word pairs were more frequent than reverse-iconic word pairs; frequency of word order explained response times in a semantic judgment task better than iconicity did; and when iconic word pairs were presented in a horizontal arrangement, the iconicity effect disappeared, but the word order effect remained. These findings show that spatial iconicity patterns are reflected in word order patterns and that comprehenders are sensitive to these word order patterns in language-processing tasks.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Institute for Intelligent Systems, University of Memphis, Memphis, Tennessee 38152, USA. mlouwerse@memphis.edu
authors.forename: Max M
authors.initials: MM
authors.lastname: Louwerse
mesh_terms: D032882:Comprehension; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D011939:Mental Recall; D009949:Orientation; D010153:Paired-Associate Learning; D011930:Reaction Time; D012660:Semantics; D012718:Set, Psychology
references.citation: Cogn Sci. 2007 Sep 10;31(5):733-64
references.pmid: 21635316
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2003 Dec;10(4):954-8
references.pmid: 15000544
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1990 Jan;16(1):149-57
references.pmid: 2136750
references.citation: Science. 2002 Oct 18;298(5593):553-4
references.pmid: 12386323
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2001 Nov;65(4):235-41
references.pmid: 11789427