Tentacle probe sandwich assay in porous polymer monolith improves specificity, sensitivity and kinetics.
Nucleic acid sandwich assays improve low-density array analysis through the addition of a capture probe and a specific label, increasing specificity and sensitivity. Here, we employ photo-initiated porous polymer monolith (PPM) as a high-surface area substrate for sandwich assay analysis. PPMs are shown to enhance extraction efficiency by 20-fold from 2 microl of sample. We further compare the performance of labeled linear probes, quantum dot labeled probes, molecular beacons (MBs) and tentacle probes (TPs). Each probe technology was compared and contrasted with traditional hybridization methods using labeled sample. All probes demonstrated similar sensitivity and greater specificity than traditional hybridization techniques. MBs and TPs were able to bypass a wash step due to their 'on-off' signaling mechanism. TPs demonstrated reaction kinetics 37.6 times faster than MBs, resulting in the fastest assay time of 5 min. Our data further indicate TPs had the most sensitive detection limit (<1 nM) as well as the highest specificity (>1 x 10(4) improvement) among all tested probes in these experiments. By matching the enhanced extraction efficiencies of PPM with the selectivity of TPs, we have created a format for improved sandwich assays.
Satterfield
Brent C
BC
Harrington Department of Bioengineering, Arizona State University Tempe, AZ, USA.
Caplan
Michael R
MR
West
Jay A A
JA
D005456:Fluorescent Dyes / Q000737:chemistry; D007700:Kinetics; D009693:Nucleic Acid Hybridization / Q000379:methods*; D015345:Oligonucleotide Probes / Q000737:chemistry*; D011108:Polymers / Q000737:chemistry; D020641:Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; D045663:Quantum Dots
D005456:Fluorescent Dyes; D015345:Oligonucleotide Probes; D011108:Polymers
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 May 25;96(11):6171-6
10339560
Biotechniques. 2004 Aug;37(2):286-92, 294, 296
15335222
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(10):e76
17517788
Nucleic Acids Res. 1986 Jan 24;14(2):1017-28
3945551
Clin Chem. 2007 Dec;53(12):2042-50
17932130
Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Feb 15;29(4):996-1004
11160933
Anal Chem. 2001 Nov 1;73(21):5088-96
11721904
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Oct;85(20):7652-6
3174659
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2002 Aug 6;213(2):175-82
12167534
Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2004 Dec;8(6):565-86
15584863
Gene. 1983 Jan-Feb;21(1-2):77-85
6301952
Nucleic Acids Res. 1989 Jul 25;17(14):5865
2548171
Ann Biomed Eng. 2005 Aug;33(8):1113-24
16133919
Appl Spectrosc. 2004 Sep;58(9):269A-280A
15479516
Nat Biotechnol. 1996 Mar;14(3):303-8
9630890
Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Nov 1;30(21):e122
12409481
Anal Chem. 2001 Dec 15;73(24):5777-83
11791544
Cell. 1977 Sep;12(1):23-36
198139
Anal Chem. 2001 Mar 1;73(5):849-56
11289427
Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Aug 15;30(16):e87
12177315
Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2000 Dec;4(6):696-703
11102876
Lab Chip. 2004 Apr;4(2):141-7
15052355
Methods Mol Biol. 2007;385:9-21
18365701
Anal Biochem. 2001 Mar 1;290(1):89-97
11180941
Anal Chim Acta. 2007 Mar 21;587(1):9-13
17386747
Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 1998 Nov 2;37(20):2754-2794
29711117
Nucleic Acids Res. 1990 Oct 25;18(20):6157-8
2235518
Anal Chem. 2002 Feb 15;74(4):784-9
11866058
Anal Chem. 2007 Aug 15;79(16):6230-5
17625914
J Chromatogr A. 2001 Aug 3;925(1-2):251-63
11519810
Nucleic Acids Res. 2003 Feb 15;31(4):1319-30
12582252