Staging of cholangiocarcinoma: the role of endoscopy.
The main question for staging is resectability, which is reliant on vascular, longitudinal, and metastatic spread. Today, accurate staging of perihilar tumors is achieved by non-invasive diagnostic investigations. Direct cholangiography has been the gold standard as a diagnostic procedure in recent decades. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreaticography (ERCP) often only shows the ducts below the obstruction, and visualization of an obstructed part of the biliary tree is often not possible. Direct cholangiography reveals no information about local tumor extension, lymph nodes, or vascular involvement. Because of the given limitations, potential complications (cholangitis, sepsis) associated with direct cholangiography and reduction of the accuracy of subsequent cross-sectional imaging studies, these invasive techniques should only be used in the case of palliative interventions. Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) can be used to assess the nature of biliary strictures and to derive information about the extent of periductal disease and the presence of lymph node metastases. In a study by Fritscher-Ravens, 44 patients with hilar strictures underwent EUS-FNA. The overall diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 91% (95% CI, 78.4-96.3%), 89% (95% CI, 73.3-96.8%), 100% (95% CI, 63.1-100%), 100% (95% CI, 88.8-100%), and 67% (95% CI, 34.9-90%), respectively. The planned surgical approach was changed in 27 of 44 patients. In 15-20% of cholangiocarcinoma, patients with unremarkable abdominal imaging studies have metastatic lymph node involvement according to EUS evaluation. Due to the risk of peritoneal seeding, however, EUS with FNA is not recommended in patients still with a potential curative tumor.
Rauws
E A J
EA
Department of Gastroenterology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. e.a.rauws@amc.uva.nl
Kloek
J J
JJ
Gouma
D J
DJ
Van Gulik
T M
TM
Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Oct;52(4):534-40
11023576
Radiology. 2006 Apr;239(1):113-21
16467211
Gut. 2000 Jan;46(1):103-6
10601064
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003 May-Jun;27(3):315-20
12794592
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2000;7(2):155-62
10982608
Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Nov;54(5):587-94
11677474
Liver Transpl. 2000 Nov;6(6 Suppl 2):S30-4
11084082
Gastrointest Endosc. 1992 Sep-Oct;38(5):531-5
1327937
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Jan;99(1):45-51
14687140
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Aug;99(8):1464-9
15307861
Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Mar;53(3):300-7
11231387
World J Surg. 1988 Feb;12(1):39-47
2449769
Eur Radiol. 2006 Oct;16(10):2317-25
16622690
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2000 Jan;35(1):77-82
10672839
Am J Gastroenterol. 2004 Sep;99(9):1684-9
15330902
Gastrointest Endosc. 2000 Apr;51(4 Pt 1):383-90
10744806
Gut. 2002 Nov;51 Suppl 6:VI1-9
12376491
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 Mar;2(3):209-13
15017604
Gastrointest Endosc. 1998 Jan;47(1):28-32
9468420
Cytopathology. 2004 Apr;15(2):74-9
15056166
Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Sep;64(3):325-33
16923477
Endoscopy. 2005 Aug;37(8):715-21
16032489
Gastroenterology. 2006 Oct;131(4):1064-72
17030177