title: Stage-specific predator species help each other to persist while competing for a single prey.
abstract: Prey in natural communities are usually shared by many predator species. How predators coexist while competing for the same prey is one of the fundamental questions in ecology. Here, we show that competing predator species may not only coexist on a single prey but even help each other to persist if they specialize on different life history stages of the prey. By changing the prey size distribution, a predator species may in fact increase the amount of prey available for its competitor. Surprisingly, a predator may not be able to persist at all unless its competitor is also present. The competitor thus significantly increases the range of conditions for which a particular predator can persist. This "emergent facilitation" is a long-term, population-level effect that results from asymmetric increases in the rate of prey maturation and reproduction when predation relaxes competition among prey. Emergent facilitation explains observations of correlated increases of predators on small and large conspecific prey as well as concordance in their distribution patterns. Our results suggest that emergent facilitation may promote the occurrence of complex, stable, community food webs and that persistence of these communities could critically depend on diversity within predator guilds.
authors.affiliation: Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94084, 1090 GB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. A.M.deRoos@uva.nl
authors.forename: A M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: De Roos
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Schellekens
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Van Kooten
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Persson
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003163:Competitive Behavior / Q000502:physiology*; D020387:Food Chain; D008954:Models, Biological; D011235:Predatory Behavior / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: Science. 2007 Jun 22;316(5832):1743-6
references.pmid: 17588929
references.citation: Science. 2001 Sep 21;293(5538):2248-51
references.pmid: 11567137
references.citation: Science. 1974 Jul 5;185(4145):27-39
references.pmid: 17779277
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Oct 1;99(20):12907-12
references.pmid: 12237404
references.citation: Monogr Popul Biol. 1978;(11):1-189
references.pmid: 683203
references.citation: Am Nat. 2007 Sep;170(3):E59-76
references.pmid: 17879182
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Sep 1;13(9):350-5
references.pmid: 21238339
references.citation: Theor Popul Biol. 2008 Feb;73(1):47-62
references.pmid: 18006030
references.citation: Oecologia. 1991 May;86(3):342-348
references.pmid: 28312919
references.citation: Oecologia. 1993 Mar;95(1):70-80
references.pmid: 28313314
references.citation: Science. 1965 Oct 1;150(3692):28-35
references.pmid: 17829740