When in doubt, chimpanzees rely on estimates of past reward amounts.
Many animals can repeatedly judge the larger of two sets of food items. However, it remains unclear as to what information might accrue regarding the relative rates of return from these repeated responses. Information about overall rates of return is, in fact, unnecessary to perform well at the task itself. However, if an uncertain situation arose, such as when the quantity in one set was unknown, that information would be useful in determining whether to select a known quantity or an unknown quantity. We gave chimpanzees this test. First, they made multiple judgements between two visible food sets that varied in the number of items across trials. Then, they were faced with the same combinations of set sizes, but only one set was revealed while the other remained unknown. Rather than using a specific quantity as a threshold for choosing the known or the unknown set, the chimpanzees' choice of the unknown set varied in relation to the rate of return from responses in the first phase (when both sets were known). This indicated that the chimpanzees' decisions in the face of uncertainty were guided by a sense of how well they were rewarded overall during the session.
Beran
Michael J
MJ
Language Research Center, Georgia State University, University Plaza, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA. mjberan@yahoo.com
Evans
Theodore A
TA
Harris
Emily H
EH
D000818:Animals; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D002679:Pan troglodytes / Q000523:psychology*; D012201:Reward; D035501:Uncertainty
Behav Processes. 2005 Apr 29;69(1):33-43
15795068
J Exp Child Psychol. 2008 Jul;100(3):225-33
18022633
Anim Behav. 2008 May;75(5):1793-1802
19412322
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1995 Jan;21(1):82-6
7844508
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2005 Mar;191(3):201-11
15759141
J Comp Psychol. 2000 Jun;114(2):136-47
10890585
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007 Jan;33(1):42-54
17227194
Anim Cogn. 2008 Jan;11(1):43-57
17443355
Behav Processes. 1997 Dec;41(3):227-36
24896855
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2000 Jan;26(1):31-49
10650542
J Exp Child Psychol. 2006 Nov;95(3):215-29
16808924
Science. 2004 Jun 18;304(5678):1782-7
15205529
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Jan;3(1):20-9
26158666
J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:267-72
13713775
Psychol Sci. 2004 Feb;15(2):94-9
14738515
J Comp Psychol. 2004 Mar;118(1):25-36
15008670
J Comp Psychol. 2007 Aug;121(3):241-9
17696650
J Comp Psychol. 2006 Nov;120(4):416-26
17115863
Anim Cogn. 2008 Jul;11(3):495-503
18247068
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Jan;31(1):79-94
15656729
J Comp Psychol. 2005 Aug;119(3):343-51
16131263
J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Nov;26(3):487-93
16811963
J Comp Psychol. 2001 Jun;115(2):181-91
11459165
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1998 Apr;24(2):215-28
9556910
Psychol Sci. 2006 May;17(5):401-6
16683927
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Apr 22;267(1445):829-33
10819154
Cognition. 2006 Feb;99(1):53-71
15894302