title: From foetid air to filth: the cultural transformation of British epidemiological thought, ca. 1780-1848.
abstract: Eighteenth-and early nineteenth-century ideas about the occurrence and spread of epidemic disease were complex and contested. Although many thought that diseases such as plague, typhus, and cholera were contagious and were communicated from person to person or via the medium of goods, others believed that they were the product of atmospheric change. Moreover, as historians have emphasized, the early nineteenth century saw a move from a multifactoral, climatic etiology toward one that prioritized specific local corruption of the atmosphere caused by putrefying animal and vegetable matter. In this paper, I extend this analysis by linking to recent literature on dirt and disgust and exploring the importance of theologies. I examine the work of two key figures in the history of British epidemiology, Charles Maclean and Thomas Southwood Smith, and demonstrate how the latter's increasing emphasis upon the causal agency of filth was structured by his Unitarian faith and his belief in a universally benevolent God.
authors.affiliation: Centre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Manchester, UK. michael.brown-2@manchester.ac.uk
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Brown
mesh_terms: D000397:Air Pollution / Q000266:history*; D002980:Climate; D003141:Communicable Diseases / Q000266:history*; D004813:Epidemiology / Q000266:history*; D049671:History, 18th Century; D049672:History, 19th Century; D006801:Humans; D011634:Public Health / Q000266:history*; D012499:Sanitation / Q000266:history*; D006113:United Kingdom
references.citation: Hist Sci. 1984 Dec;22(58 pt 4):401-19
references.pmid: 11611664
references.citation: Bull Hist Med. 1948 Sep;22:562-93
references.pmid: 18106184
references.citation: Past Present. 1988;(120):123-46
references.pmid: 11617908
references.citation: Med Hist. 1958 Apr;2(2):77-86
references.pmid: 13526538
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 1995 Jun;85(6):856-66
references.pmid: 7762726
references.citation: Soc Hist Med. 1992 Apr;5(1):43-70
references.pmid: 11612776
references.citation: Med Hist. 1978 Apr;22(2):138-50
references.pmid: 349276
references.citation: Vic Stud. 2001;43(4):591-617
references.pmid: 19320089
references.citation: BMJ. 1999 Apr 17;318(7190):1083
references.pmid: 10205130
references.citation: Bull Hist Med. 1996 Spring;70(1):68-93
references.pmid: 8850071
references.citation: South Asia Res. 1985;5(2):167-86
references.pmid: 11618151
references.citation: Bull Hist Med. 1991 Winter;65(4):528-48
references.pmid: 1802317
references.citation: J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2006 Apr;61(2):144-86
references.pmid: 16377755
references.citation: Vic Stud. 1985;28:381-411
references.pmid: 11621267
references.citation: Proc R Soc Med. 1962 May;55:381-92
references.pmid: 14037403
references.citation: Bull Hist Med. 1996 Summer;70(2):233-65
references.pmid: 8680257
references.citation: J R Inst Public Health. 1948 Jan;11(1):9-26
references.pmid: 18901949
references.citation: J Health Polit Policy Law. 1995 Winter;20(4):1025-31
references.pmid: 8770762
references.citation: Clio Med. 1993;23:46-80
references.pmid: 7691473
references.citation: Trans Med Soc Lond. 2007-2008;124:137-8
references.pmid: 21991687