title: Culture, embodiment and genes: unravelling the triple helix.
abstract: Much recent work stresses the role of embodiment and action in thought and reason, and celebrates the power of transmitted cultural and environmental structures to transform the problem-solving activity required of individual brains. By apparent contrast, much work in evolutionary psychology has stressed the selective fit of the biological brain to an ancestral environment of evolutionary adaptedness, with an attendant stress upon the limitations and cognitive biases that result. On the face of it, this suggests either a tension or, at least, a mismatch, with the symbiotic dyad of cultural evolution and embodied cognition. In what follows, we explore this mismatch by focusing on three key ideas: cognitive niche construction; cognitive modularity; and the existence (or otherwise) of an evolved universal human nature. An appreciation of the power and scope of the first, combined with consequently more nuanced visions of the latter two, allow us to begin to glimpse a much richer vision of the combined interactive potency of biological and cultural evolution for active, embodied agents.
authors.affiliation: Department of Philosophy, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK. m.w.wheeler@stir.ac.uk
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Wheeler
authors.forename: Andy
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Clark
mesh_terms: D005075:Biological Evolution; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D003468:Cultural Evolution; D006801:Humans; D011340:Problem Solving; D012931:Social Environment
references.citation: Science. 2005 Feb 18;307(5712):1082-5
references.pmid: 15718465
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999 Jun 30;882:119-27; discussion 128-34
references.pmid: 10415890
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Jul;2(7):475-83
references.pmid: 11433372
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Mar 1;16(3):128-135
references.pmid: 11179576
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 1997 Dec;20(4):723-42; discussion 743-67
references.pmid: 10097009
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Feb;23(1):131-46; discussion 146-75
references.pmid: 11303338
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2008 Jun;31(3):321-31; discussion 331-56
references.pmid: 18578929