Dietary supplement use among elderly, long-term cancer survivors.
BACKGROUND
The purpose of the present study was to assess dietary supplement use and its association with micronutrient intakes and diet quality among older (>or=65 years), long-term survivors (>or=5 years post-diagnosis) of female breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer.


METHODS
The sample included 753 survivors who participated in telephone screening interviews to determine eligibility for a randomized diet and physical activity intervention trial entitled RENEW: Reach-out to ENhancE Wellness in Older Cancer Survivors. Telephone surveys included two 24-hour dietary recalls and items regarding supplement use (type, dose, and duration). Nutrient intakes were compared to Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs). Diet quality was assessed using the revised Healthy Eating Index (HEI). Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression were used in this cross-sectional study.


RESULTS
A majority of survivors (74%) reported taking supplements, with multivitamins (60%), calcium/vitamin D (37%), and antioxidants (30%) as the most prevalent. Overall proportions of the total sample with dietary intakes below Estimated Average Requirements (EARs) were substantial, although supplement users had more favorable mean HEI scores (P < 0.01) and nutrient intakes for 12 of the 13 vitamins and minerals investigated (P values < 0.05). Supplement use was positively associated with older age (>or=70 years) (odds ratio (OR)=1.70; 95% confidence interval (95% CI)=1.17, 2.46) and female gender (OR=1.49; 95% CI=1.04, 2.13), and negatively associated with current smoking (OR=0.40, 95% CI=0.21, 0.76). Individuals scoring higher on the Total Fruit (OR=1.12, 95% CI=1.01, 1.23), Whole Grain (OR=1.14, 95% CI=1.04, 1.25), and Oil (OR=1.10, 95% CI=1.01, 1.11) components of the HEI were significantly more likely to take supplements, while those scoring higher on the Meat and Beans category (OR=0.81, 95% CI=0.71, 0.93) were significantly less likely to take supplements. Compared to those with less than a high school education, survivors with a professional or graduate degree were significantly more likely to use supplements (OR=2.18, 95% CI=1.13, 4.23).


CONCLUSIONS
Demographic, disease, and health-related correlates of supplement use follow similar trends observed in the general population as well as previous reports from other cancer survivor populations. Supplement use may reduce the prevalence of nutrient inadequacies in this population, though survivors who use supplements are the least likely to need them.


CONCLUSIONS
Supplement use may be an effective means for many survivors to achieve adequate nutrient intakes; however, open communication between healthcare providers and survivors is needed to ensure potential concerns are addressed as supplement use may not always be beneficial.
Miller
Paige
P
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA. pem136@psu.edu
Demark-Wahnefried
Wendy
W
Snyder
Denise Clutter
DC
Sloane
Richard
R
Morey
Miriam C
MC
Cohen
Harvey
H
Kranz
Sibylle
S
Mitchell
Diane C
DC
Hartman
Terryl J
TJ
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D019587:Dietary Supplements / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D004435:Eating; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008297:Male; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000401:mortality; D012044:Regression Analysis; D017741:Survivors / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*
Urology. 2005 Jul;66(1):161-6
15992901
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007 Jan 18;4:2
17233904
J Altern Complement Med. 2004 Aug;10(4):660-6
15353022
NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2006 May 15-17;23(2):1-30
17332802
Aging (Milano). 1993 Apr;5(2 Suppl 1):51-3
8399449
Am J Epidemiol. 2003 May 15;157(10):888-97
12746241
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1998 Jan;7(1):79-81
9456246
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 1;23(34):8884-93
16314649
J Altern Complement Med. 2002 Aug;8(4):477-85
12230908
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jun 15;22(12):2489-503
15197212
J Am Diet Assoc. 2004 Apr;104(4):576-84
15054343
Prev Med. 2005 Jun;40(6):702-11
15850868
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996 Aug;44(8):959-62
8708308
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 May 16;99(10):754-64
17505071
Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Jan;85(1):318S-322S
17209218
J Am Diet Assoc. 1999 Nov;99(11):1406-11
10570678
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Mar;35(3):415-24
12618570
J Am Diet Assoc. 2007 Aug;107(8):1322-32
17659898
Am J Clin Nutr. 2006 Apr;83(4):895-904
16600944
J Nutr. 2006 May;136(5):1359-64
16614430
Nutr Cancer. 1997;29(2):133-9
9427976
Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Jan;85(1):277S-279S
17209209
Nutr Cancer. 2003;46(1):15-22
12925299
Lancet. 2004 Oct 2-8;364(9441):1193-4
15464163
JAMA. 2007 Feb 28;297(8):842-57
17327526
Am J Clin Nutr. 2001 Oct;74(4):479-86
11566646
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Feb 1;26(4):665-73
18235127
J Nutr Health Aging. 2004;8(3):140-3
15129298
Am J Epidemiol. 2004 Aug 15;160(4):339-49
15286019
Public Health Nutr. 1999 Mar;2(1):69-73
10452734
J Am Diet Assoc. 1995 Oct;95(10):1103-8
7560680
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Jul;33(7):1126-41
11445760
Am J Clin Nutr. 2007 Jan;85(1):280S-284S
17209210
N Engl J Med. 1996 May 2;334(18):1150-5
8602180
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Aug 20;23(24):5814-30
16043830
Dent Clin North Am. 1997 Oct;41(4):681-98
9344273
N Engl J Med. 1994 Apr 14;330(15):1029-35
8127329
Lancet. 2002 Oct 12;360(9340):1131-5
12387961
Cancer. 2000 Feb 1;88(3):674-84
10649263
Lancet. 2007 Aug 25;370(9588):657-66
17720017
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Jul;18(13):2515-21
10893281
J Am Diet Assoc. 2003 Mar;103(3):323-8
12616253
Am J Clin Nutr. 1997 Oct;66(4):819-28
9322556
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004 Oct 18;(4):CD004183
15495084
Public Health Nutr. 2002 Dec;5(6A):843-9
12633508
J Gerontol. 1994 May;49(3):M123-32
8169334
J Nutr. 2003 Nov;133(11 Suppl 1):3785S-3793S
14608115
JAMA. 2000 Oct 25;284(16):2034-6
11042733
J Am Diet Assoc. 1998 Mar;98(3):285-92
9508010
Lancet. 2004 Oct 2-8;364(9441):1219-28
15464182
CA Cancer J Clin. 2003 Sep-Oct;53(5):268-91
14570227
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Jul 15;24(2):281-91
16842454
Aging Clin Exp Res. 2005 Jun;17(3):201-6
16110732
Cancer. 2001 Mar 1;91(5):1040-5
11251957
Nutr Cancer. 2001;41(1-2):29-32
12094625