Heterogeneity in conduit artery function in humans: impact of arterial size.
To determine whether conduit artery size affects functional responses, we compared the magnitude, time course, and eliciting shear rate stimulus for flow-mediated dilation (FMD) in healthy men (n = 20; 31 +/- 7 yr). Upper limb (brachial and radial) and lower limb (common and superficial femoral) FMD responses were simultaneously assessed, whereas popliteal responses were measured in the same subjects during a separate visit. Glyceryl trinitrate (GTN)-mediated responses were similarly examined. Edge detection and wall tracking of high-resolution B-mode arterial ultrasound images, combined with synchronized Doppler waveform envelope analysis, were used to calculate conduit artery diameter, blood flow, and shear rate continuously across the cardiac cycle. Baseline artery size correlated inversely with the FMD response (r = -0.57, P < 0.001). Within-artery comparisons revealed a significant inverse correlation between artery size and FMD% for the radial (r = -0.66, P = 0.001), brachial (r = -0.55, P = 0.01), and popliteal artery (r = -0.48, P = 0.03), but not for the superficial and common femoral artery. Normalization of FMD responses for differences in eliciting shear rate did not abolish the between-artery relationship for artery function and size (r = -0.48, P < 0.001), suggesting that differences between artery function responses were not entirely due to size-related differences in shear rate. This was reinforced by a significant between-artery correlation for GTN responses and baseline artery size (r = -0.74, P < 0.001). In summary, systematic differences exist in vascular function responses of conduit arteries that differ in size. This raises the possibility that differences in artery size within or between individuals may influence functional responses.
Thijssen
Dick H J
DH
Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Science, Liverpool John Moore's University, Henry Cotton Campus, 15-21 Webster St., Liverpool L3 2ET, United Kingdom. d.thijssen@fysiol.umcn.nl
Dawson
Ellen A
EA
Black
Mark A
MA
Hopman
Maria T E
MT
Cable
N Timothy
NT
Green
Daniel J
DJ
D000328:Adult; D001158:Arteries / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology*; D001916:Brachial Artery / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology; D004730:Endothelium, Vascular / Q000502:physiology; D005263:Femoral Artery / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D005996:Nitroglycerin / Q000494:pharmacology; D011150:Popliteal Artery / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology; D011673:Pulsatile Flow; D017534:Radial Artery / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology; D012039:Regional Blood Flow; D013997:Time Factors; D018608:Ultrasonography, Doppler; D014664:Vasodilation / Q000187:drug effects; D014665:Vasodilator Agents / Q000494:pharmacology
D014665:Vasodilator Agents; D005996:Nitroglycerin
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001 Aug;91(2):929-37
11457812
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006 Jan;290(1):H272-8
16183733
Circulation. 2002 Aug 6;106(6):640-2
12163419
Lancet. 1992 Nov 7;340(8828):1111-5
1359209
Hypertension. 2008 Feb;51(2):203-10
18086954
Acta Physiol Scand. 1958 Dec 15;44(3-4):255-72
13617022
Hypertension. 1995 Apr;25(4 Pt 1):464-73
7721385
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2008 Jan 22;6:6
18208623
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2002 Jul;93(1):361-8
12070226
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005 Jul;99(1):81-6
15718401
Circulation. 2002 Apr 2;105(13):1567-72
11927524
Lancet. 2001 Oct 27;358(9291):1400-4
11705484
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Dec;38(7):1843-9
11738283
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002 Aug 7;40(3):505-10
12142118
J Physiol. 2008 Feb 15;586(4):1137-45
18096601
Int J Cardiol. 2000 Nov-Dec;76(2-3):219-25
11104877
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005 Feb;288(2):H822-8
15345491
Circ Res. 2001 Feb 2;88(2):145-51
11157665
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Sep;22(3):854-8
8354824
J Physiol. 2004 Nov 15;561(Pt 1):1-25
15375191
J Cardiovasc Risk. 2001 Oct;8(5):319-28
11702039
J Physiol. 2005 Oct 15;568(Pt 2):357-69
16051630
Am J Cardiol. 2000 Jul 15;86(2):207-10
10913483
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Feb 27;49(8):883-90
17320747
N Engl J Med. 2007 Mar 1;356(9):911-20
17329698
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2008 Aug;105(2):766-8
18174390
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001 Dec;38(7):1859-65
11738285
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Apr;102(4):1510-9
17170205
Circulation. 2001 Jul 10;104(2):191-6
11447085
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2002 Apr;282(4):H1262-9
11893560
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006 Mar;290(3):H1271-7
16272199
Clin Sci Mol Med Suppl. 1978 Dec;4:3s-22s
153216
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 Aug;97(2):499-508
15064302
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Sep;103(3):843-51
17556495