title: Discharges in human muscle spindle afferents during a key-pressing task.
abstract: Most manual tasks demand a delicate control of the wrist. Sensory information for this control, e.g. about the position and movement velocity of the hand, is assumed to be primarily provided by muscle spindle afferents. It is known that human muscle spindles in relaxed muscles behave as stretch receptors but it is unclear how they discharge during 'natural' hand movements, since their discharges can also be affected by extrafusal contractions and fusimotor activity. We therefore let subjects perform a centre-out-centre key-pressing task on buttons laid out in a 3 x 3 pattern, a task that allowed unconstrained hand and finger movements and required precise control of the wrist. Microneurography recordings from muscle spindle afferents of the wrist extensor muscles were obtained along with wrist kinematics and electromyographic signals. The discharge rates of afferents were more phase advanced than expected on the length of the radial wrist extensor, which acted as an anti-gravity muscle in the key-pressing task. As such, both acceleration and velocity had significant impacts on the discharge rate of primary afferents, velocity on that of secondary afferents, and length had no impact on either afferent type. The response patterns were different for the two types of muscle spindle afferents from the predominantly eccentrically contracting ulnar wrist extensor: muscle length and velocity had significant impacts on the ensemble response of secondary afferents whereas the primary afferents showed highly variable responses. Accordingly, good predictions of the radial ulnar angular velocity were possible from spindle ensemble responses (R(2) = 0.85) whereas length could be predicted only for phases with lengthening of the ulnar wrist extensor. There are several possible explanations for the unexpectedly large phase advance of spindle afferents in the radial wrist extensor. Given the compliance of tendons, for instance, the phase relationship between the muscle fascicle length and the whole muscle length is conjectured to depend on the load. While additional phase advances are advantageous in motor control, it is concluded that if the central nervous system estimates length or velocity of a muscle from its muscle spindle discharges, this would require additional information about not only the concomitant extrafusal and fusimotor drive but also about the mechanical properties of the load on which the muscle acts.
authors.affiliation: Physiology Section, Department of Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Dimitriou
authors.forename: Benoni B
authors.initials: BB
authors.lastname: Edin
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000344:Afferent Pathways / Q000502:physiology; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D004576:Electromyography; D004594:Electrophysiology; D005260:Female; D006225:Hand; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology; D009470:Muscle Spindles / Q000294:innervation* / Q000502:physiology*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1983 Apr;49(4):989-1006
references.pmid: 6222165
references.citation: Brain Res. 1983 Jul 18;271(1):89-99
references.pmid: 6883123
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1985 Sep;54(3):549-64
references.pmid: 2931501
references.citation: J Physiol. 2001 Oct 15;536(Pt 2):635-47
references.pmid: 11600696
references.citation: Neuroreport. 2001 Dec 21;12(18):4029-33
references.pmid: 11742233
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2002 Mar;87(3):1186-95
references.pmid: 11877492
references.citation: J Physiol. 2002 Mar 1;539(Pt 2):637-45
references.pmid: 11882694
references.citation: Hum Neurobiol. 1987;6(1):27-37
references.pmid: 3034839
references.citation: J Neurosci Methods. 1988 Jun;24(2):137-44
references.pmid: 3405011
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1988;71(1):59-71
references.pmid: 3416958
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1990;82(1):191-8
references.pmid: 2257904
references.citation: Acta Physiol Scand. 1990 Sep;140(1):23-30
references.pmid: 2275402
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1991 Mar;65(3):657-70
references.pmid: 2051199
references.citation: J Physiol. 1991 May;436:219-36
references.pmid: 2061831
references.citation: J Physiol. 1991 Aug;439:325-50
references.pmid: 1832716
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1992 May;67(5):1105-13
references.pmid: 1597700
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1993 Nov;70(5):2136-47
references.pmid: 8294975
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1994 May;71(5):1848-61
references.pmid: 8064352
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1994 Dec;14(12):7529-40
references.pmid: 7996193
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1995;103(1):123-36
references.pmid: 7615028
references.citation: J Physiol. 1995 Aug 15;487(1):243-51
references.pmid: 7473253
references.citation: J Biomech. 1996 Oct;29(10):1365-70
references.pmid: 8884483
references.citation: J Physiol. 1996 Nov 1;496 ( Pt 3):857-71
references.pmid: 8930850
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1996 Dec;76(6):3994-4008
references.pmid: 8985895
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1995 Oct;74(4):1675-88
references.pmid: 8989404
references.citation: Science. 1997 Feb 21;275(5303):1113-5
references.pmid: 9027309
references.citation: J Biomech. 1997 May;30(5):457-63
references.pmid: 9109557
references.citation: J Physiol. 1998 Feb 15;507 ( Pt 1):277-91
references.pmid: 9490851
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1990 Jun;63(6):1297-306
references.pmid: 2141632
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1990 Jun;63(6):1307-13
references.pmid: 2358878
references.citation: Prog Brain Res. 1989;80:75-85; discussion 57-60
references.pmid: 2634287
references.citation: J Physiol. 1990 Mar;422:245-64
references.pmid: 2141077
references.citation: J Physiol. 1998 Feb 15;507 ( Pt 1):293-304
references.pmid: 9490855
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1998 May;79(5):2265-76
references.pmid: 9582203
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 1999 Jul;127(2):171-81
references.pmid: 10442409
references.citation: J Physiol. 1962 May;161:357-78
references.pmid: 14451214
references.citation: J Physiol. 1964 Oct;174:132-51
references.pmid: 14228608
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2004 Dec;92(6):3233-43
references.pmid: 15548636
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2005 Sep;94(3):1699-706
references.pmid: 15917323
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2006 Oct;96(4):1772-88
references.pmid: 16672301
references.citation: J Physiol. 1988 Jun;400:101-11
references.pmid: 2971105
references.citation: J Physiol. 2007 Apr 15;580(Pt. 2):649-58
references.pmid: 17255169
references.citation: Brain Res Bull. 2007 Jul 12;73(4-6):155-202
references.pmid: 17562384
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2007 Oct;10(10):1329-36
references.pmid: 17873869
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Apr;9(4):292-303
references.pmid: 18319728
references.citation: J Physiol. 2000 Sep 1;527 Pt 2:397-404
references.pmid: 10970440
references.citation: J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000 Aug;10(4):249-53
references.pmid: 10969198
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2000 Oct;134(3):301-10
references.pmid: 11045355
references.citation: J Physiol. 2001 Feb 15;531(Pt 1):289-97
references.pmid: 11179411
references.citation: J Physiol. 1971 Oct;218(2):405-31
references.pmid: 4256547
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1975 May;38(3):560-71
references.pmid: 123950
references.citation: Brain Res. 1975 May 2;88(2):378-83
references.pmid: 125139
references.citation: J Physiol. 1975 Dec;253(1):175-206
references.pmid: 128457
references.citation: J Physiol. 1977 Jun;267(3):811-38
references.pmid: 141497
references.citation: J Physiol. 1977 Jun;267(3):839-56
references.pmid: 141498
references.citation: J Physiol. 1977 Sep;270(3):835-50
references.pmid: 143527
references.citation: Pflugers Arch. 1977 Dec 12;372(2):131-8
references.pmid: 564033
references.citation: J Physiol. 1978 Mar;276:159-64
references.pmid: 148508
references.citation: J Physiol. 2002 Apr 15;540(Pt 2):635-46
references.pmid: 11956349
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2002 Jul 15;22(14):5803-7
references.pmid: 12122040
references.citation: Experientia. 1967 Dec 15;23(12):1026-7
references.pmid: 4229611
references.citation: Exp Neurol. 1968 Jul;21(3):270-89
references.pmid: 5673644
references.citation: J Physiol. 1969 Feb;200(3):723-43
references.pmid: 4237132
references.citation: J Physiol. 1969 Dec;205(3):677-94
references.pmid: 4243390
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1970 Jan;33(1):59-72
references.pmid: 4243791
references.citation: Brain Res. 1981 Jan 5;204(1):209-13
references.pmid: 7248748
references.citation: J Physiol. 1982 Jan;322:167-79
references.pmid: 6461756