Tunnel widening following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autograft: a comparison between double cross-pin and suspensory graft fixation.
Femoral and tibial tunnel widening following ACL reconstruction using hamstring autograft has been described. Greater tunnel widening has been reported with suspensory fixation systems. We hypothesized that greater tunnel widening will be observed in patients whose hamstring autograft was fixated using a cortical, suspensory system, compared to double cross-pin fixation on the femur. We performed clinical and radiographic evaluation on 46 patients at minimum 2 years after primary ACL reconstruction. We measured subjective and objective outcomes including KT-1000 and AP, lateral radiographs. A musculoskeletal radiologist, independent of the surgical team, measured tunnel width, while correcting for magnification, at the widest point and at 1 cm away from tibial and femoral tunnel apertures. Patients in the suspensory graft fixation group exhibited significantly greater absolute change and greater percent change in femoral tunnel diameter compared to patients with double cross-pin fixation (P<or=0.05). This difference was noted on both AP and lateral radiographs and at both measurement sites. There was no significant difference between groups for tibial tunnel widening, IKDC subjective scores or KT-1000 side to side differences. There was significantly more femoral tunnel widening associated with the use of the endobutton suspensory fixation system compared to the use of double cross-pins for fixation within the tunnel.
Baumfeld
Joshua A
JA
Lahey Clinic, Boston, MA, USA.
Diduch
David R
DR
Rubino
L Joseph
LJ
Hart
Jennifer A
JA
Miller
Mark D
MD
Barr
Michelle S
MS
Hart
Joseph M
JM
D020341:Absorbable Implants / Q000009:adverse effects*; D000328:Adult; D016118:Anterior Cruciate Ligament / Q000601:surgery*; D000070598:Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries; D001182:Arthroscopy / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000379:methods; D006801:Humans; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery*; D008875:Middle Aged; D010014:Osteolysis; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D053441:Suture Anchors / Q000009:adverse effects*; D055815:Young Adult
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999;7(5):290-5
10525698
Adv Ther. 2004 Mar-Apr;21(2):123-31
15310085
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2004 Jan;12(1):30-5
13680104
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1996;4(1):2-8
8819056
Int Orthop. 2007 Feb;31(1):49-55
16683112
Am J Sports Med. 1991 Mar-Apr;19(2):112-8
2039061
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1997;5(4):234-8
9430573
Am J Sports Med. 2002 Jul-Aug;30(4):523-36
12130407
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004 Oct;86(10):2143-55
15466722
Am J Sports Med. 2000 Jul-Aug;28(4):547-51
10921648
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1998;6(4):231-40
9826805
Am J Sports Med. 2007 Oct;35(10):1725-30
17687123
Arthroscopy. 2000 Oct;16(7):707-14
11027754
Knee. 2007 Aug;14(4):321-7
17512735
Am J Sports Med. 2004 Mar;32(2):543-9
14977688
Arthroscopy. 2004 Feb;20(2):122-8
14760343
Knee. 2006 Mar;13(2):127-31
16352431
Arthroscopy. 2004 Jan;20(1):34-6
14716276
Arthroscopy. 2003 May-Jun;19(5):470-6
12724675
Arthroscopy. 2005 Apr;21(4):418-23
15800521
Am J Sports Med. 2003 Jul-Aug;31(4):564-73
12860546
Arthroscopy. 2004 Jul;20(6):572-80
15241306
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2002 Mar;10(2):80-5
11914764
Arthroscopy. 2007 Mar;23(3):291-8
17349473
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 Aug;15(8):965-72
17503019
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1999;7(3):138-45
10401649
Am J Sports Med. 1994 May-Jun;22(3):410-4
8037283
Arthroscopy. 1998 Nov-Dec;14(8):810-5
9848590
Arthroscopy. 2001 Feb;17(2):138-43
11172242
Arthroscopy. 2005 Nov;21(11):1337-41
16325084
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Oct;34(10):1574-80
16685087
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2005 Mar;13(2):81-91
15756612