Careful with understudied phyla: the case of chaetognath.
BACKGROUND
A recent study by Barthélémy et al. described a set of ribosomal protein (RP) genes extracted from a collection of expressed sequence tags (ESTs) of the chaetognath (arrow worm) Spadella cephaloptera. Three main conclusions were drawn in this paper. First, the authors stated that RP genes present paralogous copies, which have arisen through allopolyploidization. Second, they reported two alternate nucleotide stretches conserved within the 5' untranslated regions (UTR) of multiple ribosomal cDNAs and they suggested that these motifs are involved in the differential transcriptional regulation of paralogous RP genes. Third, they claimed that the phylogenetic position of chaetognaths could not be accurately inferred from a RP dataset because of the persistence of two problems: a long branch attraction (LBA) artefact and a compositional bias.


RESULTS
We reconsider here the results described in Barthélémy et al. and question the evidence on which they are based. We find that their evidence for paralogous copies relies on faulty PCR experiments since they attempted to amplify DNA fragments absent from the genomic template. Our PCR experiments proved that the conserved motifs in 5'UTRs that they targeted in their amplifications are added post-transcriptionally by a trans-splicing mechanism. Then, we showed that the lack of phylogenetic resolution observed by these authors is due to limited taxon sampling and not to LBA or to compositional bias. A ribosomal protein dataset thus fully supports the position of chaetognaths as sister group of all other protostomes. This reinterpretation demonstrates that the statements of Barthélémy et al. should be taken with caution because they rely on inaccurate evidence.


CONCLUSIONS
The genomic study of an unconventional model organism is a meaningful approach to understand the evolution of animals. However, the previous study came to incorrect conclusions on the basis of experiments that omitted validation procedures.
Marlétaz
Ferdinand
F
Station Marine d'Endoume, CNRS UMR 6540 DIMAR, Centre d'Océanologie de Marseille, Université de Méditerranée, Marseille, France. Ferdinand.Marletaz@univmed.fr
Le Parco
Yannick
Y
D000818:Animals; D001483:Base Sequence; D018076:DNA, Complementary / Q000235:genetics; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D020224:Expressed Sequence Tags; D016678:Genome; D007448:Invertebrates / Q000145:classification* / Q000235:genetics; D010802:Phylogeny; D025341:Principal Component Analysis; D012269:Ribosomal Proteins / Q000235:genetics; D016415:Sequence Alignment; D020040:Trans-Splicing
D018076:DNA, Complementary; D012269:Ribosomal Proteins; C030254:ribosomal protein S8
Nature. 2006 Nov 2;444(7115):85-8
17051155
J Morphol. 1996 Apr;228(1):27-44
29852579
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 29;104(22):9364-9
17517633
Trends Genet. 2004 Feb;20(2):62-7
14746985
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Dec 19;97(26):14473-7
11121049
BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Aug 28;7:146
17725830
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2006 Mar;38(3):621-34
16434216
Cell. 2002 Apr 19;109(2):153-6
12007402
Antioxid Redox Signal. 2005 Mar-Apr;7(3-4):367-84
15706084
Biochemistry (Mosc). 1999 Jun;64(6):678-92
10395984
Gene. 2006 Oct 15;381:18-23
16914272
PLoS Genet. 2006 Nov 24;2(11):e198
17121468
Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Apr;17(4):540-52
10742046
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jul 05;34(11):3378-88
16822859
Mol Ecol. 2006 Oct;15(11):3319-38
16968273
Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2003 Apr 3;127(2):151-60
12672524
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Dec;24(12):2723-9
17921486
Genome Res. 2002 Oct;12(10):1466-82
12368239
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Apr 12;102(15):5454-9
15800040
Open Virol J. 2008;2:44-60
19440464
Trends Ecol Evol. 2007 Mar;22(3):148-55
17129636
Science. 2005 Dec 23;310(5756):1933-8
16373569
Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Nov;17(11):1581-8
11070046
Mol Biol Evol. 1993 May;10(3):660-76
8336548
Curr Biol. 2006 Aug 8;16(15):R577-8
16890510
PLoS One. 2007 Aug 08;2(8):e717
17684563
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Apr 27;363(1496):1463-72
18192187
BMC Evol Biol. 2004 Jun 28;4:18
15222900
Genome Res. 2004 Jan;14(1):29-36
14707168
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jul 20;101(29):10639-43
15249679
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 May;22(5):1175-84
15703245
Bioinformatics. 2002 Mar;18(3):502-4
11934758
Dev Genes Evol. 2003 Apr;213(3):142-8
12690453
Genome Res. 2002 Oct;12(10):1611-8
12368254
Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Jun;21(6):1095-109
15014145
IUBMB Life. 2006 Dec;58(12):677-85
17424906
Curr Biol. 2006 Aug 8;16(15):R575-6
16890509
Mol Biol Evol. 2007 Jan;24(1):6-9
17012374
Genome Biol. 2008;9(6):R94
18533022
Nat Genet. 2003 Sep;35(1):41-8
12897783
Trends Genet. 2005 Apr;21(4):240-7
15797620
Syst Biol. 2003 Oct;52(5):696-704
14530136
Mol Biol Evol. 2004 Nov;21(11):2122-9
15306659
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 8;98(10):5693-8
11331766
Syst Biol. 2006 Jun;55(3):522-9
16861214
Genetica. 1999;107(1-3):209-38
10952214
Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Sep 1;25(17):3389-402
9254694
Syst Biol. 2007 Jun;56(3):389-99
17520503
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 May;22(5):1246-53
15703236
BMC Evol Biol. 2007 Feb 08;7 Suppl 1:S4
17288577
Mol Biol Evol. 2005 Jun;22(6):1482-9
15788744
Bioinformatics. 2000 Mar;16(3):296-7
10869026
Cell Mol Biol Lett. 2007;12(4):573-83
17588220
Mitochondrion. 2006 Oct;6(5):258-62
16949352
Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand). 2007 Sep 13;53 Suppl:OL989-93
17877912