title: National bioethical legislation and guidelines for biomedical research in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
abstract: Rapid advances in biomedical science and technology, which have revolutionized medicine and health-care services in different societies, have been associated with inevitable ethical challenges. Undoubtedly, these innovations could lead to irreversible disasters if they are not limited by appropriate regulations. Substantial attempts have been made in the Islamic Republic of Iran to establish a structured approach for identifying, analysing and resolving ethical issues in clinical practice. Given the consensus of religious and scientific scholars, some laws recently approved by the parliament include the Deceased and Brain-Dead Patients Organ Transplantation Act (2000), Embryo Donation to Infertile Spouses Act (2003) and the Therapeutic Abortion Act (2005). National guidelines for ethical assessment and supervision of research proposals have also been compiled by the authorities. This paper reviews the main endeavours made in bioethics legislation in the Islamic Republic of Iran.
authors.affiliation: Endocrinology and Metabolism Research Centre, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
authors.forename: Farzaneh
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Zahedi
authors.forename: Bagher
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Larijani
mesh_terms: D000032:Abortion, Therapeutic / Q000941:ethics; D001675:Bioethics; D035843:Biomedical Research / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D032781:Codes of Ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D033041:Embryo Research / Q000941:ethics; D032984:Ethics, Research; D006801:Humans; D007492:Iran; D007514:Islam; D016377:Organ Transplantation / Q000941:ethics; D017410:Practice Guidelines as Topic; D011635:Public Health Administration / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D012068:Religion and Medicine; D027724:Reproductive Techniques, Assisted / Q000941:ethics; D012945:Social Values
references.citation: Dev World Bioeth. 2008 Dec;8(3):192-6
references.pmid: 19046256
references.citation: East Mediterr Health J. 2005 Sep-Nov;11(5-6):1061-72
references.pmid: 16761678
references.citation: Transplant Proc. 2004 Jun;36(5):1241-4
references.pmid: 15251302
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2008 Feb;40(2):123
references.pmid: 18227865
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2007 Nov;39(11):1293-8
references.pmid: 17952074
references.citation: Lancet. 2005 Aug 27-Sep 2;366(9487):774-9
references.pmid: 16125596
references.citation: Dev World Bioeth. 2006 May;6(2):106-10
references.pmid: 16594974
references.citation: Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2006 Dec;16(4):333-51
references.pmid: 17847600
references.citation: BMJ. 2007 Mar 10;334(7592):502-5
references.pmid: 17347232
references.citation: Transplant Proc. 2004 Dec;36(10):3188-9
references.pmid: 15686725
references.citation: Transplant Proc. 2004 Dec;36(10):2883-7
references.pmid: 15686651
references.citation: Med Law. 2002;21(2):211-24
references.pmid: 12184603