Advanced spot quality analysis in two-colour microarray experiments.
BACKGROUND
Image analysis of microarrays and, in particular, spot quantification and spot quality control, is one of the most important steps in statistical analysis of microarray data. Recent methods of spot quality control are still in early age of development, often leading to underestimation of true positive microarray features and, consequently, to loss of important biological information. Therefore, improving and standardizing the statistical approaches of spot quality control are essential to facilitate the overall analysis of microarray data and subsequent extraction of biological information.


RESULTS
We evaluated the performance of two image analysis packages MAIA and GenePix (GP) using two complementary experimental approaches with a focus on the statistical analysis of spot quality factors. First, we developed control microarrays with a priori known fluorescence ratios to verify the accuracy and precision of the ratio estimation of signal intensities. Next, we developed advanced semi-automatic protocols of spot quality evaluation in MAIA and GP and compared their performance with available facilities of spot quantitative filtering in GP. We evaluated these algorithms for standardised spot quality analysis in a whole-genome microarray experiment assessing well-characterised transcriptional modifications induced by the transcription regulator SNAI1. Using a set of RT-PCR or qRT-PCR validated microarray data, we found that the semi-automatic protocol of spot quality control we developed with MAIA allowed recovering approximately 13% more spots and 38% more differentially expressed genes (at FDR = 5%) than GP with default spot filtering conditions.


CONCLUSIONS
Careful control of spot quality characteristics with advanced spot quality evaluation can significantly increase the amount of confident and accurate data resulting in more meaningful biological conclusions.
Yatskou
Mikalai
M
Microarray Center/LBMAGM, CRP-Santé, 84 Rue Val Fleuri, L-1526, Luxembourg. mikalai.yatskou@uni.lu
Novikov
Eugene
E
Vetter
Guillaume
G
Muller
Arnaud
A
Barillot
Emmanuel
E
Vallar
Laurent
L
Friederich
Evelyne
E
Nat Rev Cancer. 2007 Jun;7(6):415-28
17508028
Genome Biol. 2003;4(1):R5
12540297
Bioinformatics. 2005 Sep 1;21(17):3578-9
16046497
Cancer Res. 2005 Jul 15;65(14):6237-44
16024625
Genomics. 2002 Oct;80(4):385-94
12376092
Nat Rev Genet. 2006 Mar;7(3):200-10
16485019
BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Jul 06;7:335
16824223
Nat Cell Biol. 2000 Feb;2(2):76-83
10655586
J Biol Chem. 2005 Mar 25;280(12):11740-8
15647282
BMC Genomics. 2007 Aug 29;8:294
17727702
Bioinformatics. 2006 Oct 15;22(20):2554-5
16899490
Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Sep;24(9):1151-61
16964229
J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2005 Dec;3(6):1411-28
16374914
J Biopharm Stat. 2007;17(3):415-31
17479391
Genes Dev. 2004 May 15;18(10):1131-43
15155580
Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Aug 1;29(15):E75-5
11470890
BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 Dec 09;6:293
16336688
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007 Jan;35(Database issue):D766-70
17182626
Biotechniques. 2003 Feb;34(2):374-8
12613259
Nat Genet. 2005 Feb;37(2):182-6
15640797
Nucleic Acids Res. 2002 Jun 15;30(12):e54
12060692
Bioinformatics. 2007 Mar 1;23(5):639-40
17237062
BMC Bioinformatics. 2006 Jun 16;7:306
16780582
Appl Bioinformatics. 2006;5(4):255-66
17140272
Nat Med. 2004 Sep;10(9):917-9
15322538
Bioinformatics. 2005 Apr 15;21(8):1572-8
15615693
BMC Bioinformatics. 2005 Jul 05;6:168
15998470