Inactivation of poxviruses by upper-room UVC light in a simulated hospital room environment.
In the event of a smallpox outbreak due to bioterrorism, delays in vaccination programs may lead to significant secondary transmission. In the early phases of such an outbreak, transmission of smallpox will take place especially in locations where infected persons may congregate, such as hospital emergency rooms. Air disinfection using upper-room 254 nm (UVC) light can lower the airborne concentrations of infective viruses in the lower part of the room, and thereby control the spread of airborne infections among room occupants without exposing occupants to a significant amount of UVC. Using vaccinia virus aerosols as a surrogate for smallpox we report on the effectiveness of air disinfection, via upper-room UVC light, under simulated real world conditions including the effects of convection, mechanical mixing, temperature and relative humidity. In decay experiments, upper-room UVC fixtures used with mixing by a conventional ceiling fan produced decreases in airborne virus concentrations that would require additional ventilation of more than 87 air changes per hour. Under steady state conditions the effective air changes per hour associated with upper-room UVC ranged from 18 to 1000. The surprisingly high end of the observed range resulted from the extreme susceptibility of vaccinia virus to UVC at low relative humidity and use of 4 UVC fixtures in a small room with efficient air mixing. Increasing the number of UVC fixtures or mechanical ventilation rates resulted in greater fractional reduction in virus aerosol and UVC effectiveness was higher in winter compared to summer for each scenario tested. These data demonstrate that upper-room UVC has the potential to greatly reduce exposure to susceptible viral aerosols. The greater survival at baseline and greater UVC susceptibility of vaccinia under winter conditions suggest that while risk from an aerosol attack with smallpox would be greatest in winter, protective measures using UVC may also be most efficient at this time. These data may also be relevant to influenza, which also has improved aerosol survival at low RH and somewhat similar sensitivity to UVC.
McDevitt
James J
JJ
Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Milton
Donald K
DK
Rudnick
Stephen N
SN
First
Melvin W
MW
D000336:Aerosols; D000388:Air; D000392:Air Movements; D016902:Air Pollution, Indoor / Q000517:prevention & control; D023482:Bioterrorism; D004203:Disinfection / Q000379:methods; D004777:Environment; D004867:Equipment Design; D006761:Hospitals; D017053:Infection Control / Q000379:methods; D008027:Light; D012899:Smallpox / Q000517:prevention & control* / Q000635:transmission*; D014466:Ultraviolet Rays; D012901:Variola virus / Q000502:physiology*; D014691:Ventilation
D000336:Aerosols
Environ Sci Technol. 2005 Dec 15;39(24):9656-64
16475348
J Hyg (Lond). 1961 Dec;59:479-86
13904777
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Sep;73(18):5760-6
17644645
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2007 May;4(5):321-31
17365506
Indoor Air. 2003 Sep;13(3):237-45
12950586
JAMA. 1999 Jun 9;281(22):2127-37
10367824
Am Rev Respir Dis. 1976 Apr;113(4):413-8
817628
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2005 May;2(5):285-92
15848970
J Occup Environ Hyg. 2007 May;4(5):352-62
17454503
Appl Occup Environ Hyg. 1999 May;14(5):317-28
10446484
Public Health Rep. 2003 Mar-Apr;118(2):99-114
12690064
Tuber Lung Dis. 2000;80(4-5):217-28
11052911
Am J Infect Control. 2007 Dec;35(10 Suppl 2):S65-164
18068815
Appl Microbiol. 1972 Jun;23(6):1113-20
4557562
Bull World Health Organ. 1970;43(5):669-79
5313258