title: Typicality aids search for an unspecified target, but only in identification and not in attentional guidance.
abstract: Participants searched for a picture of an object, and the object was either a typical or an atypical category member. The object was cued by either the picture or its basic-level category name. Of greatest interest was whether it would be easier to search for typical objects than to search for atypical objects. The answer was"yes," but only in a qualified sense: There was a large typicality effect on response time only for name cues, and almost none of the effect was found in the time to locate (i.e., first fixate) the target. Instead, typicality influenced verification time-the time to respond to the target once it was fixated. Typicality is thus apparently irrelevant when the target is well specified by a picture cue; even when the target is underspecified (as with a name cue), it does not aid attentional guidance, but only facilitates categorization.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada. monica.castelhano@queensu.ca
authors.forename: Monica S
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Castelhano
authors.forename: Alexander
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Pollatsek
authors.forename: Kyle R
authors.initials: KR
authors.lastname: Cave
mesh_terms: D001288:Attention; D003463:Cues; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D005133:Eye Movements; D005403:Fixation, Ocular; D006801:Humans; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D011930:Reaction Time; D012660:Semantics
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Sep;8(3):476-88
references.pmid: 11700898
references.citation: Vision Res. 2004 Jun;44(12):1411-26
references.pmid: 15066400
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Apr;32(2):423-42
references.pmid: 16634680
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1998 Aug;60(6):1067-82
references.pmid: 9718964
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2003 Apr;29(2):483-502
references.pmid: 12760630
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Oct;32(5):1243-65
references.pmid: 17002535
references.citation: J Vis. 2005 Feb 09;5(1):81-92
references.pmid: 15831069
references.citation: Neuron. 2000 Jun;26(3):703-14
references.pmid: 10896165
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1994 Apr;14(4):2190-9
references.pmid: 8158265
references.citation: Brain Res. 2006 Mar 29;1080(1):73-90
references.pmid: 16510131