title: Methodological challenges in cross-language qualitative research: a research review.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Cross-language qualitative research occurs when a language barrier is present between researchers and participants. The language barrier is frequently mediated through the use of a translator or interpreter. The purpose of this analysis of cross-language qualitative research was threefold: (1) review the methods literature addressing cross-language research; (2) synthesize the methodological recommendations from the literature into a list of criteria that could evaluate how researchers methodologically managed translators and interpreters in their qualitative studies; (3) test these criteria on published cross-language qualitative studies.
  
  
  METHODS
  A group of 40 purposively selected cross-language qualitative studies found in nursing and health sciences journals.
  
  
  METHODS
  The synthesis of the cross-language methods literature produced 14 criteria to evaluate how qualitative researchers managed the language barrier between themselves and their study participants. To test the criteria, the researcher conducted a summative content analysis framed by discourse analysis techniques of the 40 cross-language studies.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The evaluation showed that only 6 out of 40 studies met all the criteria recommended by the cross-language methods literature for the production of trustworthy results in cross-language qualitative studies. Multiple inconsistencies, reflecting disadvantageous methodological choices by cross-language researchers, appeared in the remaining 33 studies. To name a few, these included rendering the translator or interpreter as an invisible part of the research process, failure to pilot test interview questions in the participant's language, no description of translator or interpreter credentials, failure to acknowledge translation as a limitation of the study, and inappropriate methodological frameworks for cross-language research.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The finding about researchers making the role of the translator or interpreter invisible during the research process supports studies completed by other authors examining this issue. The analysis demonstrated that the criteria produced by this study may provide useful guidelines for evaluating cross-language research and for novice cross-language researchers designing their first studies. Finally, the study also indicates that researchers attempting cross-language studies need to address the methodological issues surrounding language barriers between researchers and participants more systematically.
authors.affiliation: Center for Health Outcomes & Policy Research, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. asq@nursing.upenn.edu
authors.forename: Allison
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Squires
mesh_terms: D003144:Communication Barriers; D006801:Humans; D007802:Language; D036301:Qualitative Research
references.citation: Qual Health Res. 2005 Nov;15(9):1277-88
references.pmid: 16204405
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2001 Mar;33(5):566-74
references.pmid: 11298192
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2006 Feb;53(4):435-43
references.pmid: 16448486
references.citation: Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Feb;43(2):173-84
references.pmid: 15923006
references.citation: Nurs Sci Q. 2005 Oct;18(4):286-92
references.pmid: 16210740
references.citation: J Nurs Scholarsh. 2005;37(4):348-53
references.pmid: 16396408
references.citation: Int J Nurs Stud. 2003 Nov;40(8):797-805
references.pmid: 14568362
references.citation: Nurse Res. 2007;14(3):46-59
references.pmid: 17494468
references.citation: Oncol Nurs Forum. 2007 May;34(3):713-20
references.pmid: 17573330
references.citation: Int Nurs Rev. 2004 Jun;51(2):94-103
references.pmid: 15102114
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2001 Oct;36(2):237-45
references.pmid: 11580798
references.citation: Qual Health Res. 2001 Jul;11(4):568-79
references.pmid: 11521612
references.citation: Qual Health Res. 2007 Apr;17(4):468-76
references.pmid: 17416700
references.citation: J Nurs Scholarsh. 2004;36(1):11-5
references.pmid: 15098413
references.citation: J Nurs Scholarsh. 2001;33(3):265-71
references.pmid: 11552554
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 1997 Aug;26(2):418-23
references.pmid: 9292378
references.citation: West J Nurs Res. 2001 Aug;23(5):517-35
references.pmid: 11482055
references.citation: Cancer Nurs. 2004 Jan-Feb;27(1):17-24
references.pmid: 15108948
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2004 Dec;48(6):642-50
references.pmid: 15548255
references.citation: J Holist Nurs. 2007 Jun;25(2):81-91; discussion 92; quiz 93-5
references.pmid: 17515562
references.citation: Qual Health Res. 2007 Dec;17(10):1372-80
references.pmid: 18000076
references.citation: J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2002 Feb;14(2):93-6
references.pmid: 11892542
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2003 Jan;41(1):80-7
references.pmid: 12519291
references.citation: MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2007 Jan-Feb;32(1):18-24
references.pmid: 17308453
references.citation: Qual Health Res. 2002 Jul;12(6):844-54
references.pmid: 12109728
references.citation: J Fam Nurs. 2005 Aug;11(3):242-63
references.pmid: 16287827
references.citation: West J Nurs Res. 2001 Aug;23(5):536-54
references.pmid: 11482056
references.citation: Int J Nurs Stud. 2006 Jul;43(5):535-45
references.pmid: 16143333
references.citation: J Nurs Scholarsh. 2005;37(1):10-7
references.pmid: 15813581
references.citation: Accid Emerg Nurs. 2006 Apr;14(2):97-103
references.pmid: 16554157
references.citation: Int Nurs Rev. 2006 Mar;53(1):59-65
references.pmid: 16430762
references.citation: J Midwifery Womens Health. 2002 Jul-Aug;47(4):239-46
references.pmid: 12138931
references.citation: Cancer Nurs. 2001 Oct;24(5):387-94
references.pmid: 11605709
references.citation: J Midwifery Womens Health. 2007 Jul-Aug;52(4):351-60
references.pmid: 17603957
references.citation: Int J Nurs Stud. 2004 Mar;41(3):239-46
references.pmid: 14967180
references.citation: J Community Health Nurs. 2006 Spring;23(1):49-64
references.pmid: 16445364
references.citation: Cancer Nurs. 2003 Aug;26(4):267-75
references.pmid: 12886117
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2005 Sep;51(6):549-57
references.pmid: 16129005
references.citation: J Holist Nurs. 2003 Jun;21(2):100-16
references.pmid: 12794955
references.citation: Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2006 Jul-Aug;14(4):553-60
references.pmid: 16967162
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2006 Sep;55(6):723-35
references.pmid: 16925621
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2000 Oct;32(4):857-63
references.pmid: 11095223
references.citation: Int Nurs Rev. 2008 Sep;55(3):265-73
references.pmid: 19522941
references.citation: Clin Nurs Res. 2003 Nov;12(4):304-23
references.pmid: 14620689
references.citation: Qual Health Res. 2002 Jul;12(6):816-25
references.pmid: 12109726
references.citation: J Nurs Scholarsh. 2002;34(4):323-9
references.pmid: 12501735
references.citation: Midwifery. 2005 Sep;21(3):212-23
references.pmid: 15967548
references.citation: J Nurs Scholarsh. 2006;38(3):262-8
references.pmid: 17044344
references.citation: Clin Nurs Res. 2005 Feb;14(1):32-56
references.pmid: 15604227
references.citation: J Community Health Nurs. 2007 Spring;24(1):31-47
references.pmid: 17266404
references.citation: J Adv Nurs. 2004 Mar;45(6):595-602
references.pmid: 15012637
references.citation: Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2006 Sep;15(4):397-403
references.pmid: 16968323
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1992 Aug;35(4):603-12
references.pmid: 1519114
references.citation: Res Nurs Health. 2002 Dec;25(6):438-51
references.pmid: 12424781
references.citation: Nurs Inq. 2002 Mar;9(1):52-6
references.pmid: 12164715
references.citation: ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2003 Jul-Sep;26(3):185-95
references.pmid: 12945654