title: Skin picking phenomenology and severity comparison.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Despite the substantial distress and impairment often associated with skin picking, there currently is only limited research examining various phenomenological aspects of this behavior. The present research contributes to the existing literature by investigating phenomenological variables related to skin picking, such as family involvement, anxiety, depression, and the emotional consequences of skin picking. Moreover, on the basis of symptom severity level, differences were explored between individuals with skin picking who were from a psychiatric population.
  
  
  METHODS
  Forty individuals with various clinician-ascertained DSM-IV diagnoses in addition to skin picking symptomatology participated in the present study, which was conducted from September 2002 through January 2003. Participants were administered a self-report questionnaire (which assessed demographic, symptom, and past diagnostic information) as well as the Beck Depression Inventory, the Beck Anxiety Inventory, and the Self-Injury Interview.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Phenomenological data on various aspects of individuals with skin picking are presented. Individuals with mild skin picking and individuals with severe skin picking were compared and found to differ in the level of distress they experienced (t = -2.35, p = .05) and the amount of damage caused by their picking behavior (t = -3.06, p = .01).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Overall, skin picking represents a behavior with its own unique characteristics and accompanying levels of distress and impairment that warrants specific attention by clinicians.
authors.affiliation: Bio-Behavioral Institute, Great Neck, N.Y, USA. Neziroglu@aol.com
authors.forename: Fugen
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Neziroglu
authors.forename: Dena
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Rabinowitz
authors.forename: Anna
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Breytman
authors.forename: Matthew
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Jacofsky
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 2005 Feb;114(1):140-6
references.pmid: 15709820
references.citation: Compr Psychiatry. 2007 Jul-Aug;48(4):388-93
references.pmid: 17560962
references.citation: Psychopharmacol Bull. 1995;31(2):279-88
references.pmid: 7491380
references.citation: Behav Modif. 2002 Jul;26(3):340-60
references.pmid: 12080905
references.citation: Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2006 Nov-Dec;28(6):487-93
references.pmid: 17088164
references.citation: Behav Modif. 2002 Jul;26(3):320-39
references.pmid: 12080904
references.citation: Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2007 Apr;77(2):332-42
references.pmid: 17535131
references.citation: J Clin Psychiatry. 1999 Jul;60(7):454-9
references.pmid: 10453800
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Oct;72(5):885-90
references.pmid: 15482046
references.citation: Psychosomatics. 2000 May-Jun;41(3):210-5
references.pmid: 10849452
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 2007 May;45(5):989-95
references.pmid: 17010305
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1988 Dec;56(6):893-7
references.pmid: 3204199