Effect of pictorial depth cues, binocular disparity cues and motion parallax depth cues on lightness perception in three-dimensional virtual scenes.
BACKGROUND
Surface lightness perception is affected by scene interpretation. There is some experimental evidence that perceived lightness under bi-ocular viewing conditions is different from perceived lightness in actual scenes but there are also reports that viewing conditions have little or no effect on perceived color. We investigated how mixes of depth cues affect perception of lightness in three-dimensional rendered scenes containing strong gradients of illumination in depth.


RESULTS
Observers viewed a virtual room (4 m width x 5 m height x 17.5 m depth) with checkerboard walls and floor. In four conditions, the room was presented with or without binocular disparity (BD) depth cues and with or without motion parallax (MP) depth cues. In all conditions, observers were asked to adjust the luminance of a comparison surface to match the lightness of test surfaces placed at seven different depths (8.5-17.5 m) in the scene. We estimated lightness versus depth profiles in all four depth cue conditions. Even when observers had only pictorial depth cues (no MP, no BD), they partially but significantly discounted the illumination gradient in judging lightness. Adding either MP or BD led to significantly greater discounting and both cues together produced the greatest discounting. The effects of MP and BD were approximately additive. BD had greater influence at near distances than far.


CONCLUSIONS
These results suggest the surface lightness perception is modulated by three-dimensional perception/interpretation using pictorial, binocular-disparity, and motion-parallax cues additively. We propose a two-stage (2D and 3D) processing model for lightness perception.
Kitazaki
Michiteru
M
Research Center for Future Vehicle, Toyohashi University of Technology, Tempakucho, Aichi, Japan. mich@tutkie.tut.ac.jp
Kobiki
Hisashi
H
Maloney
Laurence T
LT
D003118:Color Perception; D003463:Cues; D003867:Depth Perception; D004215:Distance Perception; D006801:Humans; D008027:Light; D009038:Motion; D009039:Motion Perception; D009903:Optical Illusions; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D015357:Vision Disparity; D015348:Vision, Binocular; D014785:Vision, Ocular; D014796:Visual Perception
Nature. 2007 May 10;447(7141):206-9
17443193
Percept Psychophys. 2008 Jul;70(5):828-40
18613631
J Vis. 2004 Sep 08;4(9):747-63
15493968
Psychol Rev. 2003 Oct;110(4):785-801
14599243
Percept Psychophys. 1990 Jul;48(1):82-90
2377443
Vision Res. 2002 Jul;42(16):1979-89
12160570
Vision Res. 1995 Feb;35(3):389-412
7892735
J Exp Psychol. 1954 Apr;47(4):263-6
13152306
J Vis. 2005 Dec 15;5(10):863-77
16441190
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1993 Dec;10(12):2442-52
8301400
Nature. 2005 Mar 3;434(7029):79-83
15744303
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Oct;7(10):1057-8
15361877
Vis Neurosci. 2006 May-Aug;23(3-4):311-21
16961962
Perception. 2006;35(9):1171-84
17120839
J Vis. 2006 May 05;6(5):634-48
16881794
J Vis. 2004 Aug 23;4(9):664-79
15493962
J Vis. 2003;3(5):347-68
12875632
Vision Res. 2007 Dec;47(28):3409-23
18053846
Perception. 1979;8(2):125-34
471676
Vision Res. 2001 Sep;41(20):2653-68
11520511
Science. 1977 Jan 14;195(4274):185-7
831266
J Vis. 2003;3(8):541-53
14632606
Science. 1992 Sep 4;257(5075):1357-63
1529336
Percept Psychophys. 1980 Dec;28(6):527-38
7208266
Am J Psychol. 1970 Mar;83(1):55-67
5449392
Perception. 2002;31(1):73-82
11922125
Perception. 2002;31(2):247-63
11922136
Nature. 1999 Dec 23-30;402(6764):877-9
10622251
Nat Neurosci. 2002 Jun;5(6):598-604
12021763
J Vis. 2007 Jan 04;7(1):1
17461669