Mediating factors in the relationship between income and mammography use in low-income insured women.
OBJECTIVE
We used secondary data from a prospective randomized mammography recruitment trial to examine whether attitudinal and facilitating characteristics mediate the observed relationship between annual household income and mammogram receipt among women in an integrated health plan.


METHODS
We compared 1419 women due for a screening mammogram based on the 1995 annual household income poverty definition for a family of four (<$15,000 vs. >$15,000). A telephone survey was used to collect information on household income, demographics, health behavior, attitudinal and facilitating variables. Administrative databases were used to document mammography receipt. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate the hazards ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of subsequent mammography use separately for women with and without a prior mammogram.


RESULTS
Several variables, including employment, living alone, believing that mammograms are unnecessary, having friends supportive of mammography, and ease of arranging transportation, completely mediated the effect of income on mammography use. In multivariable models, the direct predictive effect of income on mammography was reduced to nonsignificance (HR 1.13, 95% CI 0.82-1.54 in women with previous mammogram and HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.41-2.00 in women without previous mammogram).


CONCLUSIONS
Providing insurance does not ensure low-income populations will seek screening mammography. Efficacious interventions that address attitudes and facilitating conditions may motivate mammography use among low-income women with insurance.
Park
Alice N
AN
Urban Indian Health Institute, Seattle Indian Health Board, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Buist
Diana S M
DS
Tiro
Jasmin A
JA
Taplin
Stephen H
SH
D000368:Aged; D005260:Female; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006297:Health Services Accessibility; D006306:Health Surveys; D006801:Humans; D007182:Income; D007348:Insurance, Health; D008327:Mammography / Q000191:economics / Q000523:psychology / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D008875:Middle Aged; D010342:Patient Acceptance of Health Care / Q000208:ethnology / Q000523:psychology*; D011203:Poverty / Q000523:psychology*; D016016:Proportional Hazards Models; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Soc Sci Med. 2004 Jul;59(2):249-61
15110417
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002 Apr 3;94(7):490-6
11929949
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2002 Sep;13(9):2363-70
12191981
Prev Chronic Dis. 2007 Oct;4(4):A91
17875266
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Oct 6;96(19):1432-40
15467032
Oncology (Williston Park). 2000 Nov;14(11):1528-30, 1638, 1641-2 passim
11125939
Am J Prev Med. 2000 Apr;18(3):199-207
10722985
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002 Jan;11(1):59-71
11815402
Cancer. 2004 Sep 1;101(5 Suppl):1131-45
15316907
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Oct 5;97(19):1407-27
16204691
Am J Public Health. 1994 Jan;84(1):50-5
8279611
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986 Dec;51(6):1173-82
3806354
BMJ. 2000 Sep 16;321(7262):665-9
10987769
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004 Oct 20;96(20):1518-27
15494602
Prev Med. 2002 Jan;34(1):13-21
11749092
Ann Intern Med. 2002 May 7;136(9):641-51
11992299
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1996 Oct;5(10):845-8
8896896
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000 Feb 2;92(3):233-42
10655440
J Cancer Educ. 2001 Spring;16(1):55-8
11270902
Ethn Dis. 2000 Autumn;10(3):395-405
11110356
Health Educ Behav. 1999 Oct;26(5):689-702
10533173