Minimum joint space width and tibial cartilage morphology in the knees of healthy individuals: a cross-sectional study.
BACKGROUND
The clinical use of minimum joint space width (mJSW) and cartilage volume and thickness has been limited to the longitudinal measurement of disease progression (i.e. change over time) rather than the diagnosis of OA in which values are compared to a standard. This is primarily due to lack of establishment of normative values of joint space width and cartilage morphometry as has been done with bone density values in diagnosing osteoporosis. Thus, the purpose of this pilot study is to estimate reference values of medial joint space width and cartilage morphometry in healthy individuals of all ages using standard radiography and peripheral magnetic resonance imaging.


METHODS
For this cross-sectional study, healthy volunteers underwent a fixed-flexion knee X-ray and a peripheral MR (pMR) scan of the same knee using a 1T machine (ONI OrthOne, Wilmington, MA). Radiographs were digitized and analyzed for medial mJSW using an automated algorithm. Only knees scoring <or=1 on the Kellgren-Lawrence scale (no radiographic evidence of knee OA) were included in the analyses. All 3D SPGRE fat-sat sagittal pMR scans were analyzed for medial tibial cartilage morphometry using a proprietary software program (Chondrometrics GmbH).


RESULTS
Of 119 healthy participants, 73 were female and 47 were male; mean (SD) age 38.2 (13.2) years, mean BMI 25.0 (4.4) kg/m2. Minimum JSW values were calculated for each sex and decade of life. Analyses revealed mJSW did not significantly decrease with increasing decade (p > 0.05) in either sex. Females had a mean (SD) medial mJSW of 4.8 (0.7) mm compared to males with corresponding larger value of 5.7 (0.8) mm. Cartilage morphometry results showed similar trends with mean (SD) tibial cartilage volume and thickness in females of 1.50 (0.19) microL/mm2 and 1.45 (0.19) mm, respectively, and 1.77 (0.24) microL/mm2 and 1.71 (0.24) mm, respectively, in males.


CONCLUSIONS
These data suggest that medial mJSW values do not decrease with aging in healthy individuals but remain fairly constant throughout the lifespan with "healthy" values of 4.8 mm for females and 5.7 mm for males. Similar trends were seen for cartilage morphology. Results suggest there may be no need to differentiate a t-score and a z-score in OA diagnosis because cartilage thickness and JSW remain constant throughout life in the absence of OA.
Beattie
Karen A
KA
Dept. of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. karen.beattie@camris.ca
Duryea
Jeffrey
J
Pui
Margaret
M
O'Neill
John
J
Boulos
Pauline
P
Webber
Colin E
CE
Eckstein
Felix
F
Adachi
Jonathan D
JD
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000375:Aging; D000465:Algorithms; D002358:Cartilage, Articular / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007719:Knee Joint / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010865:Pilot Projects; D011859:Radiography; D012016:Reference Values; D013977:Tibia / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006 Oct;14(10):974-83
16730462
Skeletal Radiol. 2003 Mar;32(3):128-32
12605275
Clin Anat. 1996;9(6):386-90
8915618
Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Oct;48(10):2829-35
14558088
Am Fam Physician. 2000 Mar 15;61(6):1795-804
10750883
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2004 Dec;8(4):329-53
15643573
Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Jan;65(1):69-73
15975965
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2002 Sep;14(5):590-6
12192261
Med Phys. 2000 Mar;27(3):580-91
10757609
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2005 Mar;13(3):198-205
15727885
Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Apr;64(4):549-55
15769915
Ann Anat. 1998 Dec;180(6):487-93
9862027
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007 Jan;15(1):110-5
16978886
Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Apr;63(4):444-9
15020341
J Rheumatol. 2002 Mar;29(3):554-6
11908572
Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Nov;67(11):1545-9
18218668
Skeletal Radiol. 2001 Mar;30(3):144-50
11357452
Ann Rheum Dis. 1995 Nov;54(11):872-80
7492235
Arthritis Rheum. 1998 May;41(5):778-99
9588729
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Aug;54(8):2488-95
16868968
Acta Radiol. 1997 Nov;38(6):1063-70
9394671
Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Apr;65(4):433-41
16126797
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1998 Jul;(352):137-48
9678042
Arthritis Rheum. 2006 Mar;54(3):795-801
16508930
Ann Rheum Dis. 2005 Jul;64(7):1038-42
15640270
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 May;52(5):1411-7
15880526
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2006 Feb;8(1):16-21
16515760
Magn Reson Med. 2007 Aug;58(2):402-6
17654593
Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Nov;44(11):2556-61
11710712
Ann Rheum Dis. 1957 Dec;16(4):494-502
13498604
Clin Radiol. 1999 Aug;54(8):502-6
10484216
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003 Nov;42(11):1317-23
12810930
J Rheumatol. 1994 Jul;21(7):1310-8
7966075
Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006 Feb;20(1):39-55
16483906
J Rheumatol. 1989 Apr;16(4):427-41
2746583
Br J Rheumatol. 1991 Dec;30(6):426-8
1747696
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007 Feb;46(2):273-9
16861710
Eur Cell Mater. 2007 May 15;13:76-86
17506024
Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Nov;63(11):1490-5
15479900
Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Feb;48(2):385-90
12571847
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006;14 Suppl A:A46-75
16713720
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1998 Jul;6(4):252-9
9876394
J Rheumatol. 1994 Sep;21(9):1734-41
7799359
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1999 May;7(3):265-71
10329301
Eur Radiol. 2004 Sep;14(9):1568-73
15150666
Am J Sports Med. 2006 Oct;34(10):1648-55
16801692
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Aug;37(1):56-62
17303218
Magn Reson Med. 2007 Feb;57(2):448-54
17260363
Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Nov;67(11):1562-6
18258709
Hum Biol. 2006 Jun;78(3):353-64
17216807
Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 Dec;67(12):1683-8
18283054
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003 Apr;11(4):285-9
12681955
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2003 Feb;42(2):258-62
12595619
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2007 Sep;19(5):435-43
17762608
J Rheumatol. 1999 Jun;26(6):1359-65
10381056
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007 Jun;15(6):666-72
17321168
Ann Rheum Dis. 1998 Oct;57(10):595-601
9893570