title: Fertility in essential tremor. Data from population-based and clinical sources.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The view of essential tremor (ET) as a degenerative disorder, which is now gaining support from postmortem studies, is at odds with traditional views of ET as a 'super-healthy' condition characterized by increased longevity and fertility. Longevity has recently been re-examined in ET, yet fertility, measured by number of offspring, has never been critically assessed in this disease. The objective was to determine whether ET cases and controls differ in terms of number of children.
  
  
  METHODS
  Family history data were collected on ET cases and controls from 2 distinct sources, a population and a clinical (referred) sample.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In the population, the number of children was similar in 59 cases vs. 72 controls [mean +/- SD (median) = 2.3 +/- 2.9 (1) vs. 2.2 +/- 1.8 (2); p = 0.26]. In the referred sample, number of children was similar in 184 cases vs. 241 controls [2.0 +/- 1.5 (2) vs. 1.9 +/- 1.7 (2); p = 0.33]. In adjusted analyses, results were similar.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Fertility, measured by number of children, was similar in cases and controls. With a newer understanding of the biological substrate of ET emerging from postmortem studies, it is important to critically reassess this and other fundamental biological questions about the disease.
authors.affiliation: GH Sergievsky Center, Department of Neurology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA. edl2@columbia.edu
authors.forename: Elan D
authors.initials: ED
authors.lastname: Louis
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D020329:Essential Tremor / Q000235:genetics / Q000503:physiopathology*; D005191:Family Characteristics; D005260:Female; D005298:Fertility / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008136:Longevity; D008297:Male; D012044:Regression Analysis; D012098:Reproduction / Q000502:physiology; D018709:Statistics, Nonparametric
references.citation: Neuroepidemiology. 2007;29(3-4):208-12
references.pmid: 18043006
references.citation: Neurology. 2005 Aug 9;65(3):391-6
references.pmid: 16087903
references.citation: Neurology. 1995 Apr;45(4):645-8
references.pmid: 7723949
references.citation: J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1984 May;47(5):466-70
references.pmid: 6736976
references.citation: Brain. 1949 Jun;72(Pt. 2):113-39
references.pmid: 18136705
references.citation: AMA Arch Intern Med. 1951 Jun;87(6):808-16
references.pmid: 14829086
references.citation: Neurology. 2005 Jun 28;64(12):2008-20
references.pmid: 15972843
references.citation: Neurology. 2008 Apr 15;70(16 Pt 2):1452-5
references.pmid: 18413570
references.citation: Lancet. 2007 Apr 7;369(9568):1152-4
references.pmid: 17416247
references.citation: Mov Disord. 2003 Apr;18(4):389-94
references.pmid: 12671944
references.citation: Curr Treat Options Neurol. 1999 Mar;1(1):6-13
references.pmid: 11096690
references.citation: Mov Disord. 2008 Jan 30;23(2):174-82
references.pmid: 17999421
references.citation: J Biosoc Sci. 2001 Jul;33(3):361-73
references.pmid: 11446399
references.citation: Am J Med Genet. 1995 Nov 6;59(2):149-53
references.pmid: 8588576
references.citation: Ann Neurol. 2001 Jun;49(6):761-9
references.pmid: 11409428
references.citation: Neurology. 2003 Dec 23;61(12):1804-6
references.pmid: 14694055
references.citation: Brain. 2007 Dec;130(Pt 12):3297-307
references.pmid: 18025031
references.citation: Brain. 1948 Dec;71(Pt. 4):344-64
references.pmid: 18114336
references.citation: Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1960;36(144):1-176
references.pmid: 14414307
references.citation: Neurology. 2007 Nov 20;69(21):1982-9
references.pmid: 18025392
references.citation: J Gerontol. 1986 Jan;41(1):40-3
references.pmid: 3941254
references.citation: Neuroepidemiology. 2001 May;20(2):125-8
references.pmid: 11359080
references.citation: Arch Womens Ment Health. 2002 Oct;5(2):83-6
references.pmid: 12510204