title: To pool or not to pool, from whether to when: applications of pooling to biospecimens subject to a limit of detection.
abstract: Pooling of biological specimens has been utilised as a cost-efficient sampling strategy, but cost is not the unique limiting factor in biomarker development and evaluation. We examine the effect of different sampling strategies of biospecimens for exposure assessment that cannot be detected below a detection threshold (DT). The paper compares use of pooled samples to a randomly selected sample from a cohort in order to evaluate the efficiency of parameter estimates. The proposed approach shows that a pooling design is more efficient than a random sample strategy under certain circumstances. Moreover, because pooling minimises the amount of information lost below the DT, the use of pooled data is preferable (in a context of a parametric estimation) to using all available individual measurements, for certain values of the DT. We propose a combined design, which applies pooled and unpooled biospecimens, in order to capture the strengths of the different sampling strategies and overcome instrument limitations (i.e. DT). Several Monte Carlo simulations and an example based on actual biomarker data illustrate the results of the article.
authors.affiliation: Division of Epidemiology, Statistics and Prevention Research, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD 20852, USA. schistee@mail.nih.gov
authors.forename: Enrique F
authors.initials: EF
authors.lastname: Schisterman
authors.forename: Albert
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Vexler
mesh_terms: D053000:Analytic Sample Preparation Methods / Q000379:methods*; D015415:Biomarkers / Q000032:analysis*; D001699:Biometry; D009010:Monte Carlo Method; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity
chemical_list: D015415:Biomarkers
references.citation: Biometrics. 1999 Sep;55(3):718-26
references.pmid: 11314998
references.citation: Epidemiology. 2005 Jan;16(1):73-81
references.pmid: 15613948
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Dec;112(17):1691-6
references.pmid: 15579415
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Feb 15;163(4):374-83
references.pmid: 16394206
references.citation: Stat Med. 2003 Aug 15;22(15):2515-27
references.pmid: 12872306
references.citation: AIHAJ. 2001 Mar-Apr;62(2):195-8
references.pmid: 11331991
references.citation: Health Lab Sci. 1976 Apr;13(2):121-8
references.pmid: 1270261
references.citation: Environ Health Perspect. 1999 Jan;107(1):75-81
references.pmid: 9872720
references.citation: Hum Reprod. 2005 Jan;20(1):279-85
references.pmid: 15513976
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Feb 15;157(4):355-63
references.pmid: 12578806
references.citation: Am J Epidemiol. 2001 Jul 15;154(2):174-9
references.pmid: 11447052