Impact of transgene inheritance on the mitigation of gene flow between crops and their wild relatives: the example of foxtail millet.
Developing genetically modified crop plants that are biologically contained could reduce significantly the potential spread of transgenes to conventional and organic crop plants and to wild or weedy relatives. Among several strategies, the hereditary mode of transmission of transgenes, whether dominant, recessive, or maternal, could play a major role in interspecific gene flow. Here we report on the gene flow between foxtail millet (Setaria italica), an autogamous crop, and its weedy relative, S. viridis, growing within or beside fields containing the three kinds of inherited herbicide resistance. Over the 6-year study, in the absence of herbicide selection, the maternal chloroplast-inherited resistance was observed at a 2 x 10(-6) frequency in the weed populations. Resistant weed plants were observed 60 times as often, at 1.2 x 10(-4) in the case of the nuclear recessive resistance, and 190 times as often, at 3.9 x 10(-4) in the case of the dominant resistance. Because the recessive gene was not expressed in the first-generation hybrids, it should be more effective than dominant genes in reducing gene flow under normal agricultural conditions where herbicides are sprayed because interspecific hybrids cannot gain from beneficial genes.
Shi
Yunsu
Y
Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China.
Wang
Tianyu
T
Li
Yu
Y
Darmency
Henri
H
D003433:Crosses, Genetic; D051456:Gene Flow / Q000235:genetics*; D017343:Genes, Plant; D053209:Herbicide Resistance / Q000235:genetics*; D006824:Hybridization, Genetic; D030821:Plants, Genetically Modified / Q000235:genetics*; D012639:Seeds / Q000235:genetics; D032983:Setaria Plant / Q000235:genetics*; D019076:Transgenes
Genome. 2001 Aug;44(4):685-90
11550905
Trends Plant Sci. 2007 Apr;12(4):177-83
17360223
Trends Ecol Evol. 1995 Feb;10(2):67-71
21236955
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jun 20;97(13):7043-50
10860969
Planta. 2002 Jan;214(3):421-7
11855647
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Apr 24;104(17):7003-8
17420457
Nat Biotechnol. 2002 Jun;20(6):581-6
12042861
Planta. 2005 Oct;222(2):372-85
15931502
Theor Appl Genet. 2004 Jan;108(2):315-20
14513219
Plant Physiol. 2004 Dec;136(4):3920-32
15531712
Nature. 2005 Oct 13;437(7061):967-8
16222289
Theor Appl Genet. 1992 May;83(8):940-6
24202917
Pest Manag Sci. 2006 Jun;62(6):531-6
16625683