title: Evaluating ascorbate oxidase as a plant defense against leaf-chewing insects using transgenic poplar.
abstract: Ascorbate is the major water-soluble antioxidant in plants and animals, and it is an essential nutrient for most insect herbivores. Therefore, ascorbate oxidase (AO) has been proposed to function as a plant defense that decreases the availability of ascorbate to insects. This hypothesis was tested by producing transgenic poplar (Populus tremula x Populus alba; Salicaceae) with 14- to 37-fold higher foliar AO activities than control (wild type) leaves and feeding these leaves to Lymantria dispar L. (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) caterpillars and Melanoplus sanguinipes (Fabricius) (Orthoptera: Acrididae) grasshoppers. To examine potential mechanisms of activity of AO in these insects, ascorbyl radical and/or ascorbate levels were measured in gut contents. No significant changes in ascorbyl radical or ascorbate levels were found in the midgut contents of L. dispar larvae that ingested the leaves of the AO-overexpressing genotypes compared to the control genotype, and no significant decreases in ascorbate levels were found in the foregut or midgut contents of M. sanguinipes. Treatment of control leaves with commercial AO also produced no changes in the midgut biochemistry of L. dispar larvae, as measured by levels of ascorbyl radicals. Likewise, no increase in oxidative stress was observed in L. dispar that consumed tannin-treated AO-overexpressing leaves compared with tannin-treated control genotype leaves. Performance experiments were carried out on first- and fourth-instar L. dispar larvae on leaf disks and on third instars feeding on intact leaves on trees. In no case was a significant difference found in the contrast between the control and three AO-overexpressing genotypes for relative consumption rate, relative growth rate, or nutritional indices. We conclude that elevated levels of AO in poplar are unlikely to serve as a defense against herbivores such as L. dispar or M. sanguinipes and that the low oxygen levels commonly found in the guts of caterpillars and grasshoppers may limit the activity of ingested AO in these leaf-chewing insects.
authors.affiliation: Department of Molecular, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1048, USA. rvb@umich.edu
authors.forename: Raymond V
authors.initials: RV
authors.lastname: Barbehenn
authors.forename: Adam
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Jaros
authors.forename: Lynn
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Yip
authors.forename: Lan
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Tran
authors.forename: Angelos K
authors.initials: AK
authors.lastname: Kanellis
authors.forename: C Peter
authors.initials: CP
authors.lastname: Constabel
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001204:Ascorbate Oxidase / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D005247:Feeding Behavior / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology; D018506:Gene Expression Regulation, Plant / Q000502:physiology; D007313:Insecta / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000502:physiology; D007814:Larva / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology; D018515:Plant Leaves / Q000201:enzymology* / Q000235:genetics; D032107:Populus / Q000201:enzymology* / Q000235:genetics*
chemical_list: D001204:Ascorbate Oxidase
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2003 Mar;29(3):683-702
references.pmid: 12757328
references.citation: J Insect Physiol. 2007 Jan;53(1):67-74
references.pmid: 17126855
references.citation: Planta. 2003 Apr;216(6):918-28
references.pmid: 12687359
references.citation: Arch Insect Biochem Physiol. 2005 Sep;60(1):32-43
references.pmid: 16116620
references.citation: Arch Biochem Biophys. 1998 May 1;353(1):55-63
references.pmid: 9578600
references.citation: J Insect Physiol. 2001 Apr;47(4-5):349-57
references.pmid: 11166299
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2001 Feb;125(2):683-700
references.pmid: 11161026
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2005 Jul;56(417):1785-96
references.pmid: 15883131
references.citation: Planta. 2000 May;210(6):1018-22
references.pmid: 10872237
references.citation: Insect Biochem Mol Biol. 2003 Jan;33(1):125-30
references.pmid: 12459207
references.citation: Oecologia. 2007 Nov;154(1):129-40
references.pmid: 17724619
references.citation: Mol Ecol. 2006 Apr;15(5):1275-97
references.pmid: 16626454
references.citation: J Insect Physiol. 2000 Jun 1;46(6):897-903
references.pmid: 10802101
references.citation: Planta. 2007 Mar;225(4):873-85
references.pmid: 17021803
references.citation: J Exp Bot. 2006;57(14):3933-43
references.pmid: 16997902
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2005 May;31(5):969-88
references.pmid: 16124227
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 1995 Oct;21(10):1511-30
references.pmid: 24233680
references.citation: Oecologia. 1986 Dec;71(1):133-137
references.pmid: 28312095
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2003 Jul;132(3):1631-41
references.pmid: 12857842
references.citation: New Phytol. 2006;172(4):617-35
references.pmid: 17096789
references.citation: Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1978 Nov 29;85(2):655-61
references.pmid: 32882
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 1996 Oct;22(10):1901-19
references.pmid: 24227115
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2006 Jun;141(2):423-35
references.pmid: 16603663
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 1993 Jul;19(7):1553-68
references.pmid: 24249182
references.citation: Plant Cell Rep. 1992 Apr;11(3):137-41
references.pmid: 24213546