Functional MRI of auditory responses in the zebra finch forebrain reveals a hierarchical organisation based on signal strength but not selectivity.
BACKGROUND
Male songbirds learn their songs from an adult tutor when they are young. A network of brain nuclei known as the 'song system' is the likely neural substrate for sensorimotor learning and production of song, but the neural networks involved in processing the auditory feedback signals necessary for song learning and maintenance remain unknown. Determining which regions show preferential responsiveness to the bird's own song (BOS) is of great importance because neurons sensitive to self-generated vocalisations could mediate this auditory feedback process. Neurons in the song nuclei and in a secondary auditory area, the caudal medial mesopallium (CMM), show selective responses to the BOS. The aim of the present study is to investigate the emergence of BOS selectivity within the network of primary auditory sub-regions in the avian pallium.


RESULTS
Using blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) fMRI, we investigated neural responsiveness to natural and manipulated self-generated vocalisations and compared the selectivity for BOS and conspecific song in different sub-regions of the thalamo-recipient area Field L. Zebra finch males were exposed to conspecific song, BOS and to synthetic variations on BOS that differed in spectro-temporal and/or modulation phase structure. We found significant differences in the strength of BOLD responses between regions L2a, L2b and CMM, but no inter-stimuli differences within regions. In particular, we have shown that the overall signal strength to song and synthetic variations thereof was different within two sub-regions of Field L2: zone L2a was significantly more activated compared to the adjacent sub-region L2b.


CONCLUSIONS
Based on our results we suggest that unlike nuclei in the song system, sub-regions in the primary auditory pallium do not show selectivity for the BOS, but appear to show different levels of activity with exposure to any sound according to their place in the auditory processing stream.
Boumans
Tiny
T
Bio-Imaging Lab, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Gobes
Sharon M H
SM
Poirier
Colline
C
Theunissen
Frederic E
FE
Vandersmissen
Liesbeth
L
Pintjens
Wouter
W
Verhoye
Marleen
M
Bolhuis
Johan J
JJ
Van der Linden
Annemie
A
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D000819:Animal Communication; D000818:Animals; D001303:Auditory Cortex / Q000502:physiology; D001306:Auditory Pathways / Q000502:physiology; D046369:Finches / Q000502:physiology*; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D009474:Neurons / Q000378:metabolism; D016548:Prosencephalon / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000502:physiology; D013016:Sound; D013687:Telencephalon / Q000502:physiology; D013997:Time Factors; D014828:Vocalization, Animal / Q000502:physiology
Front Biosci. 2007 May 01;12:4621-40
17485400
Nat Neurosci. 2005 Oct;8(10):1371-9
16136039
J Acoust Soc Am. 2003 Dec;114(6 Pt 1):3394-411
14714819
J Commun Disord. 2006 Sep-Oct;39(5):350-65
16887139
J Neurosci. 2008 Feb 6;28(6):1509-22
18256272
Z Tierpsychol. 1965 Dec;22(7):770-83
5874921
J Neurosci. 1996 Nov 1;16(21):6987-98
8824335
Curr Biol. 2007 May 1;17(9):789-93
17433683
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Jan;89(1):472-87
12522195
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 May;7(5):347-57
16760915
J Comp Neurol. 1976 Feb 15;165(4):457-86
1262540
J Neurobiol. 2001 Sep 5;48(3):163-80
11466705
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Jun;1016:704-23
15313801
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2004 Jun;190(6):469-89
15064966
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Feb 29;97(5):2282-5
10681421
Science. 2002 Nov 22;298(5598):1569-79
12446899
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994 Nov 14;743:19-41; discussion 41-3
7802413
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Oct 24;97(22):11793-9
11050211
J Neurophysiol. 2007 May;97(5):3517-31
17360830
Neuroimage. 2007 Jan 1;34(1):156-68
17081770
J Neurosci. 2004 May 26;24(21):4971-7
15163689
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Nov;98(5):2747-64
17898149
J Comp Neurol. 1992 Nov 15;325(3):388-404
1447407
J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2004 Dec;190(12):1001-10
15449092
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 19;104(25):10667-72
17563380
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991 Dec 15;88(24):11339-43
1763048
J Neurobiol. 2005 Sep 5;64(3):275-84
15898065
Neuroimage. 2008 May 15;41(1):1-6
18358743
Neuroimage. 2008 Feb 1;39(3):1429-43
18035557
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Dec;87(24):9868-72
2124706
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000 Oct;1(1):31-40
11252766
Eur J Neurosci. 2004 Feb;19(4):1027-40
15009150
J Comp Neurol. 1996 Mar 18;366(4):613-42
8833113
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Aug 1;89(15):6818-22
1495970
J Neurosci. 1983 May;3(5):1039-57
6842281
Eur J Neurosci. 2001 Jun;13(11):2165-70
11422458
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2006 Aug;16(4):400-7
16842993
Nature. 2001 Jul 12;412(6843):150-7
11449264
J Neurosci. 1994 Nov;14(11 Pt 1):6652-66
7965067
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Jan 24;103(4):1088-93
16418265
J Neurophysiol. 2000 Apr;83(4):2315-31
10758136
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Jun;1016:222-45
15313778
Eur J Neurosci. 2007 Nov;26(9):2613-26
17970728
Annu Rev Neurosci. 1999;22:567-631
10202549
J Neurosci. 2004 Oct 13;24(41):9201-11
15483139
J Comp Neurol. 2006 Feb 10;494(5):784-91
16374807
J Neurosci. 1986 Jun;6(6):1643-61
3712002
Neuroreport. 1999 Feb 5;10(2):375-80
10203338
J Neurophysiol. 2008 Feb;99(2):931-8
17881485