title: Regional variation in the denial of reimbursement for bone mineral density testing among US Medicare beneficiaries.
abstract: Although the Bone Mass Measurement Act outlines the indications for central dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) testing for US Medicare beneficiaries, the specifics regarding the appropriate ICD-9 codes to use for covered indications have not been specified by Medicare and are sometimes ambiguous. We describe the extent to which DXA reimbursement was denied by gender and age of beneficiary, ICD-9 code submitted, time since previous DXA, whether the scan was performed in the physician's office and local Medicare carrier. Using Medicare administrative claims data from 1999 to 2005, we studied a 5% national sample of beneficiaries age > or =65 yr with part A+B coverage who were not health maintenance organization enrollees. We identified central DXA claims and evaluated the relationship between the factors listed above and reimbursement for central DXA (CPT code 76075). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the independent relationship between DXA reimbursement, ICD-9 diagnosis code, and Medicare carrier. For persons who had no DXA in 1999 or 2000 and who had 1 in 2001 or 2002, the proportion of DXA claims denied was 5.3% for women and 9.1% for men. For repeat DXAs performed within 23 mo, the proportion denied was approximately 19% and did not differ by sex. Reimbursement varied by more than 6-fold according to the ICD-9 diagnosis code submitted. For repeat DXAs performed at <23 mo, the proportion of claims denied ranged from 2% to 43%, depending on Medicare carrier. Denial of Medicare reimbursement for DXA varies significantly by sex, time since previous DXA, ICD-9 diagnosis code submitted, place of service (office vs facility), and local Medicare carrier. Greater guidance and transparency in coding policies are needed to ensure that DXA as a covered service is reimbursed for Medicare beneficiaries with the appropriate indications.
authors.affiliation: Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA. jcurtis@uab.edu
authors.forename: Jeffrey R
authors.initials: JR
authors.lastname: Curtis
authors.forename: Andrew J
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Laster
authors.forename: David J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Becker
authors.forename: Laura
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Carbone
authors.forename: Lisa C
authors.initials: LC
authors.lastname: Gary
authors.forename: Meredith L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Kilgore
authors.forename: Robert
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Matthews
authors.forename: Michael A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Morrisey
authors.forename: Kenneth G
authors.initials: KG
authors.lastname: Saag
authors.forename: S Bobo
authors.initials: SB
authors.lastname: Tanner
authors.forename: Elizabeth
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Delzell
mesh_terms: D015502:Absorptiometry, Photon / Q000191:economics*; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D015519:Bone Density; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D006278:Medicare / Q000191:economics*; D012051:Reimbursement Mechanisms / Q000191:economics*; D014481:United States
references.citation: J Clin Densitom. 1999 Fall;2(3):211-7
references.pmid: 10548816
references.citation: J Clin Densitom. 2004 Spring;7(1):1-6
references.pmid: 14742881
references.citation: Am J Manag Care. 2005 Mar;11(3):181-7
references.pmid: 15786857
references.citation: JAMA. 2007 Aug 8;298(6):629-37
references.pmid: 17684185