Analysis of clinical and demographic characteristics of patients presenting with renal colic in the emergency department.
BACKGROUND
Renal colic (RC), is one of the most severe pain patterns which is most commonly diagnosed and managed in the emergency department (ED). This study is designed to evaluate the characteristics of adult patients presenting with pain and diagnosed with RC in the ED, length of stay in the ED and hospital and factors affecting these variables.


METHODS
All consecutive adult patients who presented with side pain, flank pain, abdominal or groin pain and consequently diagnosed with urolithiasis or RC were analyzed retrospectively. Sociodemographic data, times of admission into and discharge from the ED, adjunctive complaints, results of laboratory investigations, findings on examination, treatment and drugs administered were noted.


RESULTS
A total of 235 patients with a diagnostic code of urolithiasis were enrolled. Physicians were more likely to order radiological and laboratory investigations for female patients and those without hematuria in urinalysis. The peak incidence of patients diagnosed with RC (p = 0.001) was noted in August, while the winter had the lowest frequency of relevant admissions. The peak frequency was between 06:00 and 08:00. Women stayed longer in the ED (p = 0.001). Absence of hematuria in urinalysis was associated with increased length of stay (p = 0.007).


CONCLUSIONS
Although RC is a common ED presentation for which the emergency physician has no guidelines in terms of diagnosis and management, there is no exact pattern to guide ordering investigations. Patients with atypical presentations stay longer in the ED and are likely to undergo additional tests in management.
Serinken
Mustafa
M
Emergency Physician, Department of Emergency Medicine, Pamukkale Univ, School of Medicine, Denizli, Turkey. mserinken@hotmail.com
Karcioglu
Ozgur
O
Turkcuer
Ibrahim
I
Ozkan
Halis Ilke
HI
Keysan
Mustafa Kemal
MK
Bukiran
Aytaç
A
Int Urol Nephrol. 2006;38(1):87-92
16502058
Clin Sci (Lond). 1989 Jul;77(1):105-11
2667855
Rev Urol. 2007 Winter;9(1):17-27
17396168
Urol Int. 2007;79 Suppl 1:3-7
17726345
Eur Urol. 1991;20(3):200-3
1823043
Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2001 Aug;19(3):633-54, viii
11554279
Recenti Prog Med. 2003 May;94(5):191-3
12723495
J Urol. 1993 Apr;149(4):926-30
8455277
Eur Urol. 1993;24(3):387-92
8262108
J Urol. 1999 Sep;162(3 Pt 1):685-7
10458342
BMJ. 2002 Mar 30;324(7340):767
11923160