Optimizing practice through research: a new perspective to solve an old problem.
Policy makers, researchers, clinicians, and the public are frustrated that research in the health sciences has not resulted in a greater improvement in patient outcomes. Our experience as clinicians and researchers suggests that this frustration could be reduced if health sciences research were directed by 5 broad principles: (1) the needs of patients and populations determine the research agenda; (2) the research agenda addresses contextual and implementation issues, including the development of delivery and accountability systems; (3) the research agenda determines the research methods rather than methods determines the research agenda; (4) researchers and clinicians collaborate to define the research agenda, allocate resources, and implement findings; and (5) the level of funding for implementation research is commensurate with and proportional to the magnitude of the task. To keep the research agenda focused on the task of improving health and to acknowledge that the effort must be seen as more comprehensive than translating or transferring research into practice (TRIP), we suggest that the task be reframed, using the term optimizing practice through research.
Kottke
Thomas E
TE
HealthPartners Research Foundation, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55440-1524, USA. thomas.e.kottke@healthpartners.com
Solberg
Leif I
LI
Nelson
Andrew F
AF
Belcher
Donald W
DW
Caplan
William
W
Green
Lawrence W
LW
Lydick
Eva
E
Magid
David J
DJ
Rolnick
Sharon J
SJ
Woolf
Steven H
SH
D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine / Q000379:methods; D006291:Health Policy; D006302:Health Services Research / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D020380:Needs Assessment; D011050:Policy Making
N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 28;355(26):2725-32
17192537
JAMA. 2007 Jan 24;297(4):403-6
17244837
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Winter;26(1):63-71
16557507
Circulation. 2006 Jul 11;114(2):160-7
16818808
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Dec;33(6):492-7
18022066
Ann Fam Med. 2007 May-Jun;5(3):242-50
17548852
JAMA. 2002 Oct 9;288(14):1775-9
12365965
N Engl J Med. 2004 Mar 25;350(13):1320-7
15044643
PLoS Med. 2008 Jan 8;5(1):e12
18184033
N Engl J Med. 2003 Aug 28;349(9):868-74
12944573
Am J Prev Med. 2007 Jul;33(1 Suppl):S6-8
17584592
N Engl J Med. 1998 Oct 15;339(16):1122-9
9770560
JAMA. 2002 Oct 16;288(15):1909-14
12377092
Am J Epidemiol. 2005 Oct 15;162(8):764-73
16150890
BMJ. 2003 Dec 6;327(7427):1301-2
14656811
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Feb;16(1):2-3
17301192
Mayo Clin Proc. 2000 Nov;75(11):1153-9
11075745
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Sep-Oct;11(5):339-43
15187071
JAMA. 2004 Oct 6;292(13):1588-92
15467061
J Am Board Fam Med. 2006 Jan-Feb;19(1):1-10
16491999
JAMA. 2006 Sep 13;296(10):1219-20
16968835
JAMA. 2003 Mar 12;289(10):1278-87
12633190
JAMA. 2008 Feb 13;299(6):685-7
18270357
Am J Prev Med. 2006 Oct;31(4 Suppl):S35-44
16979468