Risks and advantages of detecting individuals unfit to drive: a Markov decision analysis.
BACKGROUND
Many countries have initiated legislation to detect individuals who are unfit to drive, without any evidence that positive effects of these screening procedures outweigh negative effects.


OBJECTIVE
To measure the potential effectiveness of a screening program to detect individuals unfit to drive.


METHODS
Markov decision analysis was used to compare no screening to two potential screening strategies.


METHODS
Hypothetical cohorts of 10,000 45-year-old, 65-year-old, 75-year-old and 85-year-old individuals seen in primary care practices.


METHODS
Within the screening strategies: a clinical test without on-road confirmatory testing; a clinical test with on-road confirmatory testing, and an imposed driving cessation for patients with a positive test.


METHODS
For each strategy, we compared for two conditions (sleep disorders and dementia) the numbers of crash-related consequences prevented and of adverse events induced (primary objective) and measured the gain in quality-adjusted life years (secondary objective).


RESULTS
For sleep disorders, on-road confirmatory annual testing was the preferred strategy. Whatever the medical condition and age when screening starts, no screening was always better than single-test screening without an on-road confirmatory testing. In sensitivity analyses, these baseline conclusions were only affected by extreme values of test specificity.


CONCLUSIONS
Because of the expected difficult application and cost of road tests and annual screening by clinicians, the most acceptable strategy from public health, clinical, and individual points of view is likely to be no screening.
Leproust
Sandy
S
INSERM, U897, Equipe Avenir Prévention et prise en charge des traumatismes, Bordeaux, France.
Lagarde
Emmanuel
E
Salmi
Louis-Rachid
LR
D000063:Accidents, Traffic / Q000517:prevention & control*; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001333:Automobile Driver Examination; D003661:Decision Support Techniques; D003704:Dementia / Q000175:diagnosis; D006801:Humans; D008390:Markov Chains; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000379:methods*; D008875:Middle Aged; D012893:Sleep Wake Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis
Sleep. 2000 May 1;23(3):383-9
10811382
CMAJ. 2002 Oct 1;167(7):747-51
12389835
Med Decis Making. 1983;3(4):419-458
6668990
Rev Neurol (Paris). 2003 Apr;159(4):405-11
12773869
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Jul;20(7):572-7
16050849
BMJ. 2006 Jul 8;333(7558):75
16798754
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2000 Nov;55(6):S334-40
11078110
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Oct 13;163(18):2129-31; discussion 2131
14557207
Neurologist. 2002 Mar;8(2):61-70
12803692
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Feb;52(2):195-204
14728627
Gerontology. 2000 May-Jun;46(3):146-52
10754372
Rev Med Suisse. 2005 Jun 8;1(23):1561-2, 1564
16044798
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1997 Feb;45(2):202-6
9033520
Am J Prev Med. 2004 Apr;26(3):222-9
15026102
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Mar;52(3):434-9
14962161
Neuroepidemiology. 2001 Aug;20(3):188-95
11490165
Med Decis Making. 1985 Summer;5(2):157-77
3831638
Med Decis Making. 1997 Apr-Jun;17(2):152-9
9107610
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004 Aug 15;170(4):371-6
15142866
Ann Intern Med. 2003 Jun 3;138(11):927-37
12779304
Traffic Inj Prev. 2006 Dec;7(4):352-9
17114092
Inj Prev. 2007 Dec;13(6):382-7
18056314
Sleep. 1995 Apr;18(3):158-66
7610311
Eur Respir J. 2005 Nov;26(5):898-903
16264053
BMC Public Health. 2008 Jan 23;8:27
18215269
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998 Jul;158(1):18-22
9655701
Neurology. 2000 Jun 27;54(12):2205-11
10881240
Med Decis Making. 1994 Oct-Dec;14(4):315-24
7808207
Neurology. 2005 May 10;64(9):1525-30
15883312
Aust N Z J Med. 1999 Oct;29(5):658-61
10630646
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996 Jun;44(6):650-3
8642154
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2008 Aug;23(8):812-20
18232061
Lancet. 2000 Apr 15;355(9212):1315-9
10776744
Sleep. 1991 Dec;14(6):540-5
1798888
Neurology. 2000;54(11 Suppl 5):S4-9
10854354
J Safety Res. 2005;36(4):399-407
16226768