Ethical analysis to improve decision-making on health technologies.
Health technology assessment (HTA) is the multidisciplinary study of the implications of the development, diffusion and use of health technologies. It supports health-policy decisions by providing a joint knowledge base for decision-makers. To increase its policy relevance, HTA tries to extend beyond effectiveness and costs to also considering the social, organizational and ethical implications of technologies. However, a commonly accepted method for analysing the ethical aspects of health technologies is lacking. This paper describes a model for ethical analysis of health technology that is easy and flexible to use in different organizational settings and cultures. The model is part of the EUnetHTA project, which focuses on the transferability of HTAs between countries. The EUnetHTA ethics model is based on the insight that the whole HTA process is value laden. It is not sufficient to only analyse the ethical consequences of a technology, but also the ethical issues of the whole HTA process must be considered. Selection of assessment topics, methods and outcomes is essentially a value-laden decision. Health technologies may challenge moral or cultural values and beliefs, and their implementation may also have significant impact on people other than the patient. These are essential considerations for health policy. The ethics model is structured around key ethical questions rather than philosophical theories, to be applicable to different cultures and usable by non-philosophers. Integrating ethical considerations into HTA can improve the relevance of technology assessments for health care and health policy in both developed and developing countries.
Saarni
Samuli I
SI
Finnish Office for Health Technology Assessment, National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health, Helsinki, Finland. samuli.saarni@helsinki.fi
Hofmann
Bjørn
B
Lampe
Kristian
K
Lühmann
Dagmar
D
Mäkelä
Marjukka
M
Velasco-Garrido
Marcial
M
Autti-Rämö
Ilona
I
D001294:Attitude to Health; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003469:Culture; D003659:Decision Making, Organizational; D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D026689:Ethical Analysis; D006291:Health Policy; D006801:Humans; D033183:Interdisciplinary Communication; D038622:Internationality; D017146:Models, Organizational; D009014:Morals; D010865:Pilot Projects; D015397:Program Evaluation; D012941:Social Responsibility; D012945:Social Values / Q000208:ethnology; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical / Q000941:ethics* / Q000458:organization & administration
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005 Winter;21(1):89-95
15736519
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007 Winter;23(1):1-8
17234010
Milbank Q. 2005;83(2):193-223
15960769
Theor Med Bioeth. 2000 Jan;21(1):103-15
10927971
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Winter;20(1):71-6
15176180
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Winter;20(1):1-10
15176172
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2006 Oct 11;4:79
17034633
Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 2006 Dec;16(4):333-51
17847600
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007 Winter;23(1):9-16
17234011
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005 Summer;21(3):312-8
16110710
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006 Winter;22(1):1-9
16673674
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1997 Spring;13(2):186-219
9194352
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2000 Dec;25(6):1083-120
11142053
Health Policy. 2003 Feb;63(2):121-32
12543525
J Med Ethics. 2004 Apr;30(2):171-5
15082812
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2002 Spring;18(2):361-422
12053427
J Med Philos. 2001 Jun;26(3):245-61
11445880
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2007 Fall;23(4):436-42
17937831
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Summer;20(3):325-36
15446762
Health Care Anal. 2003 Mar;11(1):3-13
14510305