Meta-population structure in a coral reef fish demonstrated by genetic data on patterns of migration, extinction and re-colonisation.
BACKGROUND
Management strategies for coral reefs are dependant on information about the spatial population structure and connectivity of reef organisms. Genetic tools can reveal important information about population structure, however, this information is lacking for many reef species. We used a mitochondrial molecular marker to examine the population genetic structure and the potential for meta-population dynamics in a direct developing coral reef fish using 283 individuals from 15 reefs on the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. We employed a hierarchical sampling design to test genetic models of population structure at multiple geographical scales including among regions, among shelf position and reefs within regions. Predictions from island, isolation-by-distance and meta-population models, including the potential for asymmetric migration, local extinction and patterns of re-colonisation were examined.


RESULTS
Acanthochromis polyacanthus displayed strong genetic structure among regions (PhiST = 0.81, P < 0.0001) that supported an equilibrium isolation-by-distance model (r = 0.77, P = 0.001). Significant structuring across the continental shelf was only evident in the northern region (PhiST = 0.31, P < 0.001) and no evidence of isolation-by-distance was found within any region. Pairwise PhiST values indicated overall strong but variable genetic structure (mean PhiST among reefs within regions = 0.28, 0.38, 0.41), and asymmetric migration rates among reefs with low genetic structure. Genetic differentiation among younger reefs was greater than among older reefs supporting a meta-population propagule-pool colonisation model. Variation in genetic diversities, demographic expansion and population growth estimates indicated more frequent genetic bottlenecks/founder effects and subsequent population expansion in the central and southern regions compared to the northern one.


CONCLUSIONS
Our findings provide genetic evidence for meta-population dynamics in a direct developing coral reef fish and we reject the equilibrium island and isolation-by distance models at local spatial scales. Instead, strong non-equilibrium genetic structure appears to be generated by genetic bottlenecks/founder effects associated with population reductions/extinctions and asymmetric migration/(re)-colonisation of such populations. These meta-population dynamics varied across the geographical range examined with edge populations exhibiting lower genetic diversities and higher rates of population expansion than more central populations. Therefore, coral reef species may experience local population reductions/extinctions that promote overall meta-population genetic differentiation.
Bay
Line K
LK
School of Marine and Tropical Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia. line.bay@jcu.edu.au
Caley
M Julian M
MJ
Crozier
Ross H
RH
D025041:Animal Migration; D000818:Animals; D001315:Australia; D001482:Base Composition; D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial / Q000235:genetics; D017753:Ecosystem; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D053476:Extinction, Biological; D005819:Genetic Markers; D014644:Genetic Variation; D005828:Genetics, Population; D006239:Haplotypes; D008957:Models, Genetic; D010473:Perciformes / Q000235:genetics*; D011157:Population Dynamics; D016415:Sequence Alignment
D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial; D005819:Genetic Markers
Mol Ecol. 2002 Mar;11(3):289-303
11928704
Genetics. 1997 Oct;147(2):915-25
9335623
Mar Genomics. 2008 Sep-Dec;1(3-4):129-34
21798164
Mol Ecol. 2007 Feb;16(4):771-84
17284210
J Mol Evol. 1997 Nov;45(5):473-84
9342395
Evolution. 2001 Nov 11;55(11):2263-73
11794786
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000 Dec 29;355(1404):1851-64
11205346
Bioinformatics. 1998;14(9):817-8
9918953
Science. 2007 May 4;316(5825):742-4
17478720
Evolution. 1996 Jun;50(3):1167-1175
28565289
Science. 1987 May 15;236(4803):787-92
3576198
Bioinformatics. 2012 Oct 1;28(19):2537-9
22820204
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Oct 22;269(1505):2079-86
12396481
Theor Popul Biol. 1977 Dec;12(3):253-62
601717
Science. 1995 Feb 10;267(5199):880-3
7846530
Trends Ecol Evol. 1991 Jan;6(1):5-8
21232411
Genetics. 1943 Mar;28(2):114-38
17247074
Mol Biol Evol. 2003 Jan;20(1):76-86
12519909
Genetics. 1931 Mar;16(2):97-159
17246615
Comput Appl Biosci. 1989 Jul;5(3):233-4
2766009
Evolution. 1997 Aug;51(4):1232-1243
28565481
Evolution. 2003 Jul;57(7):1571-83
12940362
Evolution. 2000 Feb;54(1):226-37
10937199
Mol Ecol. 2005 Apr;14(5):1367-75
15813777
Evolution. 1997 Oct;51(5):1506-1517
28568622
Genetics. 1998 May;149(1):429-34
9584114
Bioinformatics. 2003 Dec 12;19(18):2496-7
14668244
Bioinformatics. 2001 Aug;17(8):754-5
11524383
Genetics. 1999 Jun;152(2):763-73
10353916
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Apr 10;98(8):4563-8
11287657
Curr Biol. 2005 Jul 26;15(14):1314-8
16051176
Evol Bioinform Online. 2007 Feb 23;1:47-50
19325852
Genetics. 1983 Oct;105(2):437-60
6628982
Ecol Appl. 1992 Feb;2(1):18-29
27759195
J Evol Biol. 2006 Jan;19(1):239-52
16405595
Evolution. 2000 Oct;54(5):1590-605
11108587
Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Dec;19(12):2092-100
12446801
Mol Ecol. 2004 Apr;13(4):853-64
15012760
Trends Ecol Evol. 1996 Apr;11(4):180-3
21237801
Evolution. 2003 May;57(5):949-61
12836814
Genetics. 1992 Jun;131(2):479-91
1644282
Science. 2003 Aug 15;301(5635):929-33
12920289
Trends Ecol Evol. 1990 Jul;5(7):207-10
21232356
Am Nat. 2000 Feb;155(2):252-265
10686164
Mol Biol Evol. 1993 May;10(3):512-26
8336541
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1955 Mar 15;41(3):144-50
16589632
Evolution. 1984 Nov;38(6):1358-1370
28563791
Genetics. 1964 Apr;49(4):561-76
17248204
Evolution. 1990 Nov;44(7):1717-1724
28567815
J Hered. 2006 Jan-Feb;97(1):1-12
16394255
Int Rev Cytol. 1992;141:173-216
1452431
Evolution. 1999 Jun;53(3):664-676
28565620
Mol Ecol. 2008 May;17(9):2234-44
18363661
Nature. 2000 Aug 17;406(6797):692-3
10963585
Evolution. 2002 Feb;56(2):378-99
11926506
Evolution. 1988 Sep;42(5):995-1005
28581169
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jan 16;104(3):858-63
17213323
Mol Ecol. 2004 Apr;13(4):837-51
15012759
Mol Ecol. 2004 Jan;13(1):67-80
14653789