Is mate choice in humans MHC-dependent?
In several species, including rodents and fish, it has been shown that the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) influences mating preferences and, in some cases, that this may be mediated by preferences based on body odour. In humans, the picture has been less clear. Several studies have reported a tendency for humans to prefer MHC-dissimilar mates, a sexual selection that would favour the production of MHC-heterozygous offspring, who would be more resistant to pathogens, but these results are unsupported by other studies. Here, we report analyses of genome-wide genotype data (from the HapMap II dataset) and HLA types in African and European American couples to test whether humans tend to choose MHC-dissimilar mates. In order to distinguish MHC-specific effects from genome-wide effects, the pattern of similarity in the MHC region is compared to the pattern in the rest of the genome. African spouses show no significant pattern of similarity/dissimilarity across the MHC region (relatedness coefficient, R = 0.015, p = 0.23), whereas across the genome, they are more similar than random pairs of individuals (genome-wide R = 0.00185, p<10(-3)). We discuss several explanations for these observations, including demographic effects. On the other hand, the sampled European American couples are significantly more MHC-dissimilar than random pairs of individuals (R = -0.043, p = 0.015), and this pattern of dissimilarity is extreme when compared to the rest of the genome, both globally (genome-wide R = -0.00016, p = 0.739) and when broken into windows having the same length and recombination rate as the MHC (only nine genomic regions exhibit a higher level of genetic dissimilarity between spouses than does the MHC). This study thus supports the hypothesis that the MHC influences mate choice in some human populations.
Chaix
Raphaëlle
R
Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. chaix@mnhn.fr
Cao
Chen
C
Donnelly
Peter
P
D044383:Black People / Q000235:genetics; D002755:Choice Behavior; D015894:Genome, Human; D005838:Genotype; D006680:HLA Antigens / Q000235:genetics; D006801:Humans; D008285:Major Histocompatibility Complex; D010641:Phenotype; D020641:Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; D012641:Selection, Genetic; D012725:Sexual Behavior; D044465:White People / Q000235:genetics
D006680:HLA Antigens
Behav Genet. 1989 Sep;19(5):659-74
2508616
Trends Immunol. 2005 Sep;26(9):496-502
16027037
Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Sep;61(3):497-504
9326314
Nat Rev Genet. 2002 Apr;3(4):262-73
11967551
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 7;270 Suppl 2:S254-6
14667398
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Apr 7;272(1564):759-67
15870038
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Mar 18;94(6):2210-4
9122173
Nature. 2005 Oct 27;437(7063):1299-320
16255080
Science. 1988 Jun 3;240(4857):1331-2
3375818
Nat Genet. 2002 Feb;30(2):175-9
11799397
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jun 22;268(1473):1279-85
11410155
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 May 7;273(1590):1111-6
16600889
Science. 2004 Nov 5;306(5698):1033-7
15528444
Heredity (Edinb). 2002 May;88(5):371-80
11986874
Am J Reprod Immunol. 2002 Jul;48(1):34-42
12322894
Science. 1996 Apr 5;272(5258):67-74
8600539
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 16;96(4):1522-5
9990056
Am Nat. 1999 Feb;153(2):145-164
29578757
Nature. 1991 Aug 15;352(6336):619-21
1865924
Nature. 2007 Oct 18;449(7164):851-61
17943122
Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Oct 22;264(1387):1471-9
9364787
J Chem Ecol. 2007 Feb;33(2):417-34
17191155
J Exp Med. 1976 Nov 2;144(5):1324-35
1032893
Physiol Behav. 1998 Jun 1;64(3):235-43
9748088
Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;81(3):559-75
17701901
Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Dec;5(12):889-99
15573121
Nature. 1987 May 14-20;327(6118):161-4
3574476
Nat Genet. 2006 Oct;38(10):1166-72
16998491
Anim Behav. 1998 Aug;56(2):319-327
9787022
Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Sep;61(3):505-11
9326315
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 Mar;59(3):576-83
17381516
Proc Biol Sci. 1995 Jun 22;260(1359):245-9
7630893