title: Assessment of different screw augmentation techniques and screw designs in osteoporotic spines.
abstract: This is an experimental study on human cadaver spines. The objective of this study is to compare the pullout forces between three screw augmentation methods and two different screw designs. Surgical interventions of patients with osteoporosis increase following the epidemiological development. Biomechanically the pedicle provides the strongest screw fixation in healthy bone, whereas in osteoporosis all areas of the vertebra are affected by the disease. This explains the high screw failure rates in those patients. Therefore PMMA augmentation of screws is often mandatory. This study involved investigation of the pullout forces of augmented transpedicular screws in five human lumbar spines (L1-L4). Each spine was treated with four different methods: non-augmented unperforated (solid) screw, perforated screw with vertebroplasty augmentation, solid screw with vertebroplasty augmentation and solid screw with balloon kyphoplasty augmentation. Screws were augmented with Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA). The pullout forces were measured for each treatment with an Instron testing device. The bone mineral density was measured for each vertebra with Micro-CT. The statistical analysis was performed with a two-sided independent student t test. Forty screws (10 per group and level) were inserted. The vertebroplasty-augmented screws showed a significant higher pullout force (mean 918.5 N, P = 0.001) than control (mean 51 N), the balloon kyphoplasty group did not improve the pullout force significantly (mean 781 N, P > 0.05). However, leakage occurred in some cases treated with perforated screws. All spines showed osteoporosis on Micro-CT. Vertebroplasty-augmented screws, augmentation of perforated screws and balloon kyphoplasty augmented screws show higher pullout resistance than non-augmented screws. Significant higher pullout forces were only reached in the vertebroplasty augmented vertebra. The perforated screw design led to epidural leakage due to the position of the perforation in the screw. The position of the most proximal perforation is critical, depending on screw design and proper insertion depth. Nevertheless, using a properly designed perforated screw will facilitate augmentation and instrumentation in osteoporotic spines.
authors.affiliation: Spine Centre, Orthopaedic Hospital Speising, Vienna, Austria. stephan.becker@oss.at
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Becker
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Chavanne
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Spitaler
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Kropik
authors.forename: N
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Aigner
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Ogon
authors.forename: H
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Redl
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D001843:Bone Cements / Q000627:therapeutic use; D015519:Bone Density / Q000502:physiology; D001863:Bone Screws / Q000009:adverse effects / Q000592:standards*; D004868:Equipment Failure; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007431:Intraoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000517:prevention & control; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D008297:Male; D010024:Osteoporosis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery*; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000517:prevention & control; D011859:Radiography; D013119:Spinal Cord Injuries / Q000209:etiology / Q000517:prevention & control; D013123:Spinal Fusion / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D013131:Spine / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery*; D013314:Stress, Mechanical; D054854:Vertebroplasty / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D016474:Weight-Bearing / Q000502:physiology
chemical_list: D001843:Bone Cements
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Sep 15;18(12):1673-6
references.pmid: 8235848
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Aug 1;19(15):1752-8
references.pmid: 7973971
references.citation: Spine J. 2004 Jul-Aug;4(4):402-8
references.pmid: 15246300
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Nov 1;19(21):2415-20
references.pmid: 7846594
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Feb;(203):99-112
references.pmid: 3956001
references.citation: J Spinal Disord Tech. 2007 Aug;20(6):462-7
references.pmid: 17970188
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988 Mar;13(3):241-5
references.pmid: 2968664
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969 Apr;51(3):446-55
references.pmid: 5778283
references.citation: Osteoporos Int. 2005 Mar;16 Suppl 2:S85-92
references.pmid: 15365699
references.citation: J Neurosurg. 2002 Apr;96(3 Suppl):309-12
references.pmid: 11990840
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Dec 15;22(24 Suppl):43S-48S
references.pmid: 9431644
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Feb 15;21(4):445-51
references.pmid: 8658248
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Feb 1;32(3):334-41
references.pmid: 17268265
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Nov;81(11):1519-28
references.pmid: 10565643
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Nov;(284):34-46
references.pmid: 1395312
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Sep;15(9):902-7
references.pmid: 2259978
references.citation: Eur Spine J. 2007 May;16(5):601-10
references.pmid: 17120071
references.citation: J Neurosurg Spine. 2007 Jul;7(1):47-53
references.pmid: 17633487
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Aug 1;22(15):1696-705
references.pmid: 9259778
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Nov 1;22(21):2504-9; discussion 2510
references.pmid: 9383856
references.citation: Int Orthop. 2006 Oct;30(5):366-70
references.pmid: 16586135
references.citation: Bone. 1995 Nov;17(5 Suppl):505S-511S
references.pmid: 8573428
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Feb;(203):75-98
references.pmid: 3956000
references.citation: Spine J. 2001 Nov-Dec;1(6):402-7
references.pmid: 14588296
references.citation: Neurosurgery. 2007 Sep;61(3):531-7; discussion 537-8
references.pmid: 17881965
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Nov;16(11):1335-41
references.pmid: 1750009
references.citation: Bone. 2007 Dec;41(6):946-57
references.pmid: 17913613
references.citation: Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1993 Nov;(296):278-87
references.pmid: 8222439
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Sep 1;31(19 Suppl):S144-51
references.pmid: 16946632
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Mar;15(3):195-201
references.pmid: 2353256
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985 Apr;67(4):586-92
references.pmid: 3980504
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 1;31(23):2747-55
references.pmid: 17077747
references.citation: Bone. 1992;13 Suppl 1:S7-15
references.pmid: 1581122
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1994 Feb 1;19(3):350-3
references.pmid: 8171370
references.citation: Eur Spine J. 2007 May;16(5):613-7
references.pmid: 16967297
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Jul 15;26(14):1511-5
references.pmid: 11462078
references.citation: J Spinal Disord Tech. 2006 Apr;19(2):87-91
references.pmid: 16760780
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 May 1;32(10):1077-83
references.pmid: 17471088
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Jul 15;28(14):1555-9
references.pmid: 12865844
references.citation: Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1993 Dec;18(16):2438-43
references.pmid: 8303446