A new electromechanical trainer for sensorimotor rehabilitation of paralysed fingers: a case series in chronic and acute stroke patients.
BACKGROUND
The functional outcome after stroke is improved by more intensive or sustained therapy. When the affected hand has no functional movement, therapy is mainly passive movements. A novel device for repeating controlled passive movements of paralysed fingers has been developed, which will allow therapists to concentrate on more complicated tasks. A powered cam shaft moves the four fingers in a physiological range of movement.


METHODS
After refining the training protocol in 2 chronic patients, 8 sub-acute stroke patients were randomised to receive additional therapy with the Finger Trainer for 20 min every work day for four weeks, or the same duration of bimanual group therapy, in addition to their usual rehabilitation.


RESULTS
In the chronic patients, there was a sustained reduction in finger and wrist spasticity, but there was no improvement in active movements. In the subacute patients, mean distal Fugl-Meyer score (0-30) increased in the control group from 1.25 to 2.75 (ns) and 0.75 to 6.75 in the treatment group (p < .05). Median Modified Ashworth score increased 0/5 to 2/5 in the control group, but not in the treatment group, 0 to 0. Only one patient, in the treatment group, regained function of the affected hand. No side effects occurred.


CONCLUSIONS
Treatment with the Finger Trainer was well tolerated in sub-acute & chronic stroke patients, whose abnormal muscle tone improved. In sub-acute stroke patients, the Finger Trainer group showed small improvements in active movement and avoided the increase in tone seen in the control group. This series was too small to demonstrate any effect on functional outcome however.
Hesse
Stefan
S
Klinik Berlin, Department Neurological Rehabilitation, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany. s.hesse@medicalpark.de
Kuhlmann
H
H
Wilk
J
J
Tomelleri
C
C
Kirker
Stephen G B
SG
D000208:Acute Disease; D000368:Aged; D002908:Chronic Disease; D004581:Electronics / Q000295:instrumentation; D004867:Equipment Design; D019544:Equipment Failure Analysis; D005385:Fingers; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D019563:Mechanics; D008875:Middle Aged; D015915:Motion Therapy, Continuous Passive / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D010243:Paralysis / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D000071939:Stroke Rehabilitation; D016896:Treatment Outcome
Stroke. 2003 Sep;34(9):2181-6
12907818
Phys Ther. 1987 Feb;67(2):206-7
3809245
Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2003 Sep;17(3):176-91
14503438
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2004;2004:4936-9
17271420
Clin Rehabil. 2007 Sep;21(9):782-93
17875558
Stroke. 2008 Jun;39(6):1800-7
18403742
Arch Neurol. 2002 Aug;59(8):1278-82
12164724
Stroke. 2005 Sep;36(9):1960-6
16109908
Neuroimage. 1996 Oct;4(2):105-10
9345502
Clin Rehabil. 2003 Feb;17(1):88-95
12617383
Int J Rehabil Res. 2007 Sep;30(3):227-30
17762768
Brain. 2003 Apr;126(Pt 4):866-72
12615644
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13-31
1135616
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Feb;88(2):142-9
17270510
Exp Brain Res. 2001 Jan;136(2):194-9
11206281
Clin Rehabil. 2002 Nov;16(7):709-16
12428819
Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007 Jan-Feb;14(1):1-12
17311785
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 Nov;88(11):1369-76
17964875
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2002;85:64-70
15458061
Arch Neurol. 1997 Apr;54(4):443-6
9109746
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002 Jul;83(7):952-9
12098155
Brain. 2008 Feb;131(Pt 2):425-37
18156154
Brain Res. 1989 Dec 4;503(2):258-64
2605518
Neurology. 2000 May 23;54(10):1938-44
10822433
J Physiol. 2002 Apr 15;540(Pt 2):623-33
11956348
J Rehabil Med. 2006 Sep;38(5):302-8
16931460
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2007 Sep;15(3):327-35
17894265
J Neurophysiol. 1990 Jan;63(1):82-104
2299388
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1995 Feb;97(1):18-28
7533717
Am J Occup Ther. 1985 Jun;39(6):386-91
3160243