title: Public reporting of quality data for stroke: is it measuring quality?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Public reporting of quality data is becoming more common and increasingly used to improve choices of patients, providers, and payers. We reviewed the scope and content of stroke data being reported to the public and how well it captures the quality of stroke care.
  
  
  METHODS
  We performed a cross-sectional survey of all report cards within the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Report Card Compendium. Stroke quality data were categorized into one of 5 groups: structure, process, outcomes, utilization, and finances. We also determined the congruence of mortality ratings of New York hospitals provided by 2 different report cards.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of 221 available report cards, 19 (9%) reported quality information regarding stroke and 17 specifically addressed the quality of hospital-based stroke care. The most frequent data reported were utilization measures (n=15 report cards) and outcome measures (n=14 report cards). Data regarding finances (n=4), structure of care (n=2), and process of care (n=1) were reported infrequently. Ratings were incongruent in 61 of the 157 hospitals (39%) with the same hospital being rated below average on one report care and average on another in 44 hospitals.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Publicly reported quality data pertaining to patients with stroke are incomplete, confusing, and inaccurate. Without further improvements and a better understanding of the needs and limitations of the many stakeholders, targeted transparency policies for stroke care may lead to worse quality and large economic losses.
authors.affiliation: Department of Neurology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY 14642, USA.
authors.forename: Adam
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Kelly
authors.forename: Joel P
authors.initials: JP
authors.lastname: Thompson
authors.forename: Deborah
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Tuttle
authors.forename: Curtis
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Benesch
authors.forename: Robert G
authors.initials: RG
authors.lastname: Holloway
mesh_terms: D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003695:Delivery of Health Care; D006077:Government Agencies; D006761:Hospitals / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet; D009518:New York; D010342:Patient Acceptance of Health Care; D011639:Public Opinion; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000592:standards / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012107:Research Design / Q000592:standards*; D020521:Stroke / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000628:therapy*; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014481:United States; D014483:United States Dept. of Health and Human Services
references.citation: Am J Prev Med. 2006 Dec;31(6 Suppl 2):S246-50
references.pmid: 17178313
references.citation: JAMA. 2007 Oct 17;298(15):1800-2
references.pmid: 17940238
references.citation: Med Decis Making. 1996 Oct-Dec;16(4):348-56
references.pmid: 8912296
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 2;355(18):1847-9
references.pmid: 17079758
references.citation: Neurologist. 2006 Sep;12(5):245-8
references.pmid: 16990736
references.citation: Int J Qual Health Care. 2004 Apr;16 Suppl 1:i57-63
references.pmid: 15059988
references.citation: JAMA. 2006 Jul 5;296(1):72-8
references.pmid: 16820549
references.citation: Stroke. 2005 Jul;36(7):1597-616
references.pmid: 15961715
references.citation: JAMA. 2007 Aug 15;298(7):802-4
references.pmid: 17699014
references.citation: Stroke. 2005 Jun;36(6):1227-31
references.pmid: 15879336
references.citation: Circulation. 2006 Jan 24;113(3):456-62
references.pmid: 16365198
references.citation: JAMA. 1988 Sep 23-30;260(12):1743-8
references.pmid: 3045356
references.citation: JAMA. 2000 Apr 12;283(14):1866-74
references.pmid: 10770149
references.citation: J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2008;22(4):306-11
references.pmid: 21923316
references.citation: Stroke. 2001 Sep;32(9):2058-74
references.pmid: 11546898
references.citation: JAMA. 2000 Jun 21;283(23):3102-9
references.pmid: 10865305
references.citation: JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1239-44
references.pmid: 15755946
references.citation: Lancet. 2004 Apr 3;363(9415):1147-54
references.pmid: 15064036
references.citation: JAMA. 2006 Apr 26;295(16):1912-20
references.pmid: 16639050
references.citation: Arch Surg. 2007 Sep;142(9):863-8; discussion 868-9
references.pmid: 17875841