title: Functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy in pigs: comparing a novel transverse ileal pouch to the J-pouch and straight ileoanal anastomosis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Restorative proctocolectomy followed by an ileoanal J-pouch procedure is the therapy of choice for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis. After low anterior rectal resection, the authors have reported on a novel, less complex pouch configuration, a transverse coloplasty pouch. The aim of the present work was to apply this new design to the ileal pouch construction, to evaluate feasibility, and to measure functional results in comparison with the J-pouch and the straight ileoanal anastomosis using the pig as an animal model.
  
  
  METHODS
  Twenty-three pigs underwent restorative proctocolectomy followed by reconstruction with straight ileoanal anastomosis (IAA; n = 5), J-pouch (n = 7), and a transverse ileal pouch (TIP; n = 11). Pigs were followed for 6 days postoperatively. Peristaltic function was assessed by manometry proximal to the pouch, in the reservoir, and at the level of the ileoanal anastomosis. Functional outcome was monitored by semiquantitative assessment of the general condition of the animals, postoperative feeding habits, and stool frequency and consistency. A Fourier analysis was performed in order to compare peristalsis in the ileal reservoirs. The reservoir volume was measured in situ by triple contrast computed tomography scan with 3D reconstruction.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Seventeen animals survived for 1 week. There was no difference in the general condition or the feeding habits of the groups. A significant number of pigs with the TIP pouch (7/10) had semisolid or formed stools as opposed to liquid stools after J-pouch (6/6) and IAA (4/5; p = 0.01). TIP animals had a lower stool frequency (3.2 +/- 1.14 per day) on day 6 after the operation than pigs with J-pouch, 5.33 +/- 1,03, and IAA, 4.6 +/- 1.82 (p = 0.0036). The in situ volume of the pouches did not differ significantly. The Fourier analysis demonstrated a disruption of peristalsis by the J-pouch and the TIP reconstruction but not after IAA.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The function of ileoanal reservoirs after proctocolectomy may result from the disruption of properistaltic waves after pouch formation. The mechanism of peristalsis disruption is independent of the in situ volume of the pouch.
authors.affiliation: Department of Surgery, Ruprecht-Karls University, Heidelberg, Germany.
authors.forename: F H
authors.initials: FH
authors.lastname: Schmitz-Winnenthal
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Kadmon
authors.forename: E
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Schwab
authors.forename: L V
authors.initials: LV
authors.lastname: Galindo
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Bläuer
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Niethammer
authors.forename: U
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Hinz
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Thomas
authors.forename: B M
authors.initials: BM
authors.lastname: Schmied
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Nobiling
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Weitz
authors.forename: M W
authors.initials: MW
authors.lastname: Büchler
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Z'graggen
mesh_terms: D000714:Anastomosis, Surgical / Q000379:methods; D000818:Animals; D039021:Colonic Pouches; D003672:Defecation / Q000502:physiology; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D005260:Female; D005769:Gastrointestinal Motility / Q000502:physiology; D007082:Ileum / Q000601:surgery*; D016737:Proctocolectomy, Restorative / Q000379:methods*; D020127:Recovery of Function / Q000502:physiology*; D013552:Swine; D013997:Time Factors
references.citation: Ann Surg. 1989 Sep;210(3):268-71; discussion 272-3
references.pmid: 2549890
references.citation: Dis Colon Rectum. 1980 Oct;23(7):459-66
references.pmid: 6777128
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2003 Sep;238(3):433-41; discussion 442-5
references.pmid: 14501509
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2001 Dec;234(6):788-94
references.pmid: 11729385
references.citation: Arch Surg. 1993 May;128(5):500-3; discussion 503-4
references.pmid: 8489382
references.citation: Arch Surg. 2001 Oct;136(10):1124-30
references.pmid: 11585503
references.citation: Colorectal Dis. 2007 May;9(4):310-20
references.pmid: 17432982
references.citation: Br J Surg. 1996 Dec;83(12):1763-6
references.pmid: 9038563
references.citation: Br J Surg. 1998 Jun;85(6):800-3
references.pmid: 9667712
references.citation: Dig Surg. 1999;16(5):363-6
references.pmid: 10567793
references.citation: Int J Colorectal Dis. 1991 Feb;6(1):38-41
references.pmid: 2033352
references.citation: Surgery. 1999 Jan;125(1):105-12
references.pmid: 9889806
references.citation: Ann Surg. 2003 Aug;238(2):221-8
references.pmid: 12894015
references.citation: Br J Surg. 1992 Jul;79(7):697-700
references.pmid: 1643490
references.citation: World J Surg. 1987 Dec;11(6):735-41
references.pmid: 3324500
references.citation: Dis Colon Rectum. 1995 Jan;38(1):100-3
references.pmid: 7813336
references.citation: Dis Colon Rectum. 1996 Nov;39(11):1293-5
references.pmid: 8918442