The cost effectiveness of surgical versus nonoperative treatment for lumbar disc herniation over two years: evidence from the Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT).
METHODS
Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial observational and randomized cohort participants with a confirmed diagnosis of intervertebral disc herniation (IDH) who received either usual nonoperative care and/or standard open discectomy were followed from baseline at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months at 13 spine clinics in 11 US states.


OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of surgery relative to nonoperative care among patients with a confirmed diagnosis of lumbar IDH.


BACKGROUND
The cost-effectiveness of surgery as a treatment for conditions associated with low back and leg symptoms remains poorly understood.


METHODS
Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, reported as discounted cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY) gained in 2004 US dollars based on EuroQol EQ-5D health state values with US scoring, and information on resource utilization and time away from work.


RESULTS
Among 775 patients who underwent surgery and 416 who were treated nonoperatively, the mean difference in QALYs over 2 years was 0.21 (95% CI: 0.16-0.25) in favor of surgery. Surgery was more costly than nonoperative care; the mean difference in total cost was $14,137(95% CI: $11,737-16,770). The cost per QALY gained for surgery relative to nonoperative care was $69,403 (95% CI: $49,523-94,999) using general adult surgery costs and $34,355 (95% CI: $20,419-52,512) using Medicare population surgery costs.


CONCLUSIONS
Surgery for IDH was moderately cost-effective when evaluated over 2 years. The estimated economic value of surgery varied considerably according to the method used for assigning surgical costs.
Tosteson
Anna N A
AN
Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover, NH 03756, USA. anna.tosteson@ dartmouth.edu
Skinner
Jonathan S
JS
Tosteson
Tor D
TD
Lurie
Jon D
JD
Andersson
Gunnar B
GB
Berven
Sigurd
S
Grove
Margaret R
MR
Hanscom
Brett
B
Blood
Emily A
EA
Weinstein
James N
JN
D000328:Adult; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D005260:Female; D017048:Health Care Costs; D006801:Humans; D007405:Intervertebral Disc Displacement / Q000473:pathology / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000628:therapy*; D007796:Laminectomy / Q000191:economics*; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D017059:Models, Econometric; D009989:Orthotic Devices; D026741:Physical Therapy Modalities; D011788:Quality of Life
JAMA. 2006 Nov 22;296(20):2451-9
17119141
Eur Spine J. 2007 Mar;16(3):329-37
16683121
Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc. 1982 Summer;60(3):429-62
6923138
J Clin Neurosci. 2002 Jul;9(4):411-7
12217670
JAMA. 2006 Nov 22;296(20):2441-50
17119140
Eur Spine J. 2006 Aug;15(8):1165-73
16369828
Med Care. 2005 Mar;43(3):203-20
15725977
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 May 1;21(9):1048-54; discussion 1055
8724089
Health Policy. 1990 Dec;16(3):199-208
10109801
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jun 15;27(12):1361-72
12065987
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Nov 1;31(23):2707-14
17077740
Eur Spine J. 2005 Dec;14(10):1000-7
15843969
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Aug 1;21(15):1777-86
8855462