Poverty is a risk factor for osteoporotic fractures.
This study assesses the possible association between poverty and osteoporosis and/or fragility fractures in a population of postmenopausal women. We found that postmenopausal women with low socioeconomic status had lower values of BMD at the lumbar spine, a higher prevalence of densitometric osteoporosis, and a higher prevalence of total and vertebral fractures.


BACKGROUND
Some lifestyles are related to the presence of osteoporosis and/or fragility fractures, whereas poverty is related to some lifestyles. Because of this, we studied the possible association of poverty with osteoporosis and fractures.


METHODS
This was an observational, cross-sectional study performed in the Canary Islands, Spain. Participants consisted of a total of 1,139 ambulatory postmenopausal women aged 50 years or older with no previous osteoporosis diagnosis and who were enrolled in some epidemiological studies. The prevalence of fractures (vertebral and non-vertebral) and the prevalence of osteoporosis (T-score <-2.5 either at the lumbar spine or the femoral neck). A previously validated questionnaire elicited the most important risk factors for osteoporosis: socioeconomic status, defined by the annual income was also assessed by a personal interview. A dorso-lateral X-ray of the spine was performed, and bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by DXA in the lumbar spine (L2-L4) and proximal femur.


RESULTS
Compared to women with a medium and high socioeconomic status (n = 665), those who were classified into poverty (annual family income lower than 6,346.80 Euros, in a one-member family, n = 474), were older and heavier and had lower height, lower prevalence of tobacco and alcohol consumption, lower use of HRT and higher use of thiazides. After correcting for age and body mass index (BMI), women in poverty had lower spine BMD values than women with a medium and high socioeconomic status (0.840 g/cm(2) vs. 0.867 g/cm(2), p = 0.005), but there were no statistical differences in femoral neck BMD between groups. The prevalence of osteoporosis was also higher in women in poverty [40.6% vs. 35.6%, (OR 1.35, CI 95%: 1.03; 1.76)] after adjusting by age and BMI. Moreover, 37.8% of women in poverty had a history of at least one fragility fracture compared to 27.7% of women not in poverty (OR: 1.45, CI 95%: 1.11; 1.90). The prevalence of vertebral fractures was also higher in women in poverty 24.7% vs. 13.4%, (OR 2.01, CI 95%: 1.44; 2.81).


CONCLUSIONS
Postmenopausal women with low socioeconomic status had lower values of BMD at the lumbar spine, and a higher prevalence of densitometric osteoporosis, and a higher prevalence of total and vertebral fractures. Because of this, apart from the well known risk factors for osteoporosis, poverty should be taken into account as a possible risk factor for both osteoporosis and fragility fractures, in order to establish sanitary strategies to protect unfavoured postmenopausal women.
Navarro
M C
MC
Health Education and Promotion Working Group, Canary Islands, Spain. msosa@ono.com
Sosa
M
M
Saavedra
P
P
Lainez
P
P
Marrero
M
M
Torres
M
M
Medina
C D
CD
D015502:Absorptiometry, Photon; D000368:Aged; D015992:Body Mass Index; D015519:Bone Density / Q000502:physiology; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005260:Female; D005272:Femur Neck / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D050723:Fractures, Bone / Q000453:epidemiology*; D006801:Humans; D008019:Life Style; D008159:Lumbar Vertebrae / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D008875:Middle Aged; D015663:Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal / Q000453:epidemiology*; D017698:Postmenopause; D011203:Poverty; D015995:Prevalence; D012307:Risk Factors; D013030:Spain / Q000453:epidemiology; D016103:Spinal Fractures / Q000453:epidemiology
J Bone Miner Res. 1992 Sep;7(9):1005-10
1414493
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2005 May;59(5):395-401
15831689
Osteoporos Int. 2005 Dec;16(12):1827-35
15959616
Prev Med. 1990 Jan;19(1):1-12
2320553
Epidemiol Rev. 2007;29:29-48
17478442
JAMA. 2002 Jul 17;288(3):321-33
12117397
J Clin Densitom. 1998 Winter;1(4):385-93
15304886
Appetite. 2007 Jul;49(1):198-207
17442454
JAMA. 2006 May 24;295(20):2385-93
16720824
Health Care Women Int. 2006 Mar;27(3):254-67
16524855
Prev Med. 1990 Mar;19(2):158-69
2193307
JAMA. 2004 Jun 2;291(21):2563-70
15173147
Eur J Nutr. 2004 Apr;43(2):77-85
15083314
JAMA. 2004 Dec 15;292(23):2890-900
15598921
Int J Epidemiol. 2001 Apr;30(2):275-84
11369727
J Bone Miner Res. 1993 Sep;8(9):1137-48
8237484
Osteoporos Int. 2005 Aug;16(8):921-7
16028108
Bone. 2007 Jul;41(1 Suppl 1):S3-8
17466615
Nurs Clin North Am. 2001 Sep;36(3):401-8, vii
11532655
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2000 Jan;54(1):24-30
10692958
JAMA. 2003 May 28;289(20):2673-84
12771114
Osteoporos Int. 2004 Feb;15(2):132-8
14685650
Public Health. 1993 Jul;107(4):251-60
8356207
Osteoporos Int. 1997;7(1):59-64
9102065
Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Jun;125(6):989-98
3578257
Lancet. 2002 May 18;359(9319):1761-7
12049882
Osteoporos Int. 2002;13(6):487-92
12107663
Bone. 1993;14 Suppl 1:S89-97
8110529
JAMA. 1998 Jun 3;279(21):1703-8
9624022
Pediatr Endocrinol Rev. 2006 Jun;3(4):365-78
16816805
Ann Intern Med. 1990 Apr 1;112(7):516-28
2180356
Addict Behav. 2002 May-Jun;27(3):405-23
12118628
Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2006 Jul-Aug;14(4):223-32
16912008
BMJ. 1993 Oct 30;307(6912):1085-6
8251800
JAMA. 2001 Feb 14;285(6):785-95
11176917
Lancet. 2007 Apr 21;369(9570):1373-1378
17448824
South Med J. 2003 May;96(5):458-64
12911184
Am J Epidemiol. 1987 Nov;126(5):796-802
3661527