Family presence during resuscitation: a survey of Canadian critical care nurses' practices and perceptions.
BACKGROUND
The practice of allowing family members to be present at the bedside during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a controversial one and represents a paradigm shift among health care providers. To date, no research has examined this issue from the perspective of Canadian critical care nurses.


OBJECTIVE
This research was undertaken to identify the practices and preferences of Canadian critical care nurses regarding family presence during resuscitation (FPDR), the extent to which formal FPDR policies exist in hospitals, and the level of awareness among members of the Canadian Association of Critical Care Nurses (CACCN) regarding CACCN's position statement on FPDR. A secondary objective was to compare responses from Canadian critical care nurses to the responses of American critical care and ER nurses in a 2003 survey.


METHODS
An 18-item online survey was sent to 944 members of CACCN.


RESULTS
The response rate was 47.7% (n = 450). The majority of respondents (92%) supported the option of FPDR in critical care; slightly more than their U.S. counterparts (76%). Within the last year, although fewer Canadian nurses (18.5%) compared with American nurses (31%) had been asked by family members to be brought to the bedside during CPR, the majority of both Canadian nurses (65%) and American nurses (57%) reported they had either taken a family member to the bedside, or would do so if the opportunity arose. Only 8% of Canadian respondents reported that written guidelines/policies for FPDR were available in their hospital (5% for U.S. survey respondents). Half (49.8%) of the respondents were aware that CACCN had a position statement on FPDR.


CONCLUSIONS
Although guidelines or policies for FPDR are not available in most hospitals where respondents worked, the majority of critical care nurses support FPDR and either had taken or would be willing to take family members to the bedside during CPR. The willingness of nurses in critical care to support FPDR suggests the need for more formal policies in hospitals and the development of algorithms to facilitate this process.
Fallis
Wendy M
WM
Clinical Institute of Applied Research and Education, Victoria General Hospital, Winnipeg. wfallis@vgh.mb.ca
McClement
Susan
S
Pereira
Asha
A
D000328:Adult; D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel / Q000208:ethnology; D002170:Canada; D016887:Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / Q000451:nursing / Q000523:psychology; D003422:Critical Care / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000523:psychology; D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D005190:Family / Q000523:psychology; D005260:Female; D019983:Guideline Adherence; D017408:Guidelines as Topic; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D024802:Nurse's Role / Q000523:psychology; D015404:Nursing Methodology Research; D009741:Nursing Staff, Hospital / Q000193:education / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000523:psychology*; D016134:Organizational Policy; D010362:Patients' Rooms / Q000458:organization & administration; D011368:Professional-Family Relations; D012956:Societies, Nursing; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014481:United States; D014789:Visitors to Patients / Q000523:psychology