Discharges in human muscle spindle afferents during a key-pressing task.
Most manual tasks demand a delicate control of the wrist. Sensory information for this control, e.g. about the position and movement velocity of the hand, is assumed to be primarily provided by muscle spindle afferents. It is known that human muscle spindles in relaxed muscles behave as stretch receptors but it is unclear how they discharge during 'natural' hand movements, since their discharges can also be affected by extrafusal contractions and fusimotor activity. We therefore let subjects perform a centre-out-centre key-pressing task on buttons laid out in a 3 x 3 pattern, a task that allowed unconstrained hand and finger movements and required precise control of the wrist. Microneurography recordings from muscle spindle afferents of the wrist extensor muscles were obtained along with wrist kinematics and electromyographic signals. The discharge rates of afferents were more phase advanced than expected on the length of the radial wrist extensor, which acted as an anti-gravity muscle in the key-pressing task. As such, both acceleration and velocity had significant impacts on the discharge rate of primary afferents, velocity on that of secondary afferents, and length had no impact on either afferent type. The response patterns were different for the two types of muscle spindle afferents from the predominantly eccentrically contracting ulnar wrist extensor: muscle length and velocity had significant impacts on the ensemble response of secondary afferents whereas the primary afferents showed highly variable responses. Accordingly, good predictions of the radial ulnar angular velocity were possible from spindle ensemble responses (R(2) = 0.85) whereas length could be predicted only for phases with lengthening of the ulnar wrist extensor. There are several possible explanations for the unexpectedly large phase advance of spindle afferents in the radial wrist extensor. Given the compliance of tendons, for instance, the phase relationship between the muscle fascicle length and the whole muscle length is conjectured to depend on the load. While additional phase advances are advantageous in motor control, it is concluded that if the central nervous system estimates length or velocity of a muscle from its muscle spindle discharges, this would require additional information about not only the concomitant extrafusal and fusimotor drive but also about the mechanical properties of the load on which the muscle acts.
Dimitriou
Michael
M
Physiology Section, Department of Integrative Medical Biology, Umeå University, S-901 87 Umeå, Sweden.
Edin
Benoni B
BB
D000328:Adult; D000344:Afferent Pathways / Q000502:physiology; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D004576:Electromyography; D004594:Electrophysiology; D005260:Female; D006225:Hand; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology; D009470:Muscle Spindles / Q000294:innervation* / Q000502:physiology*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology; D055815:Young Adult
J Neurophysiol. 1983 Apr;49(4):989-1006
6222165
Brain Res. 1983 Jul 18;271(1):89-99
6883123
J Neurophysiol. 1985 Sep;54(3):549-64
2931501
J Physiol. 2001 Oct 15;536(Pt 2):635-47
11600696
Neuroreport. 2001 Dec 21;12(18):4029-33
11742233
J Neurophysiol. 2002 Mar;87(3):1186-95
11877492
J Physiol. 2002 Mar 1;539(Pt 2):637-45
11882694
Hum Neurobiol. 1987;6(1):27-37
3034839
J Neurosci Methods. 1988 Jun;24(2):137-44
3405011
Exp Brain Res. 1988;71(1):59-71
3416958
Exp Brain Res. 1990;82(1):191-8
2257904
Acta Physiol Scand. 1990 Sep;140(1):23-30
2275402
J Neurophysiol. 1991 Mar;65(3):657-70
2051199
J Physiol. 1991 May;436:219-36
2061831
J Physiol. 1991 Aug;439:325-50
1832716
J Neurophysiol. 1992 May;67(5):1105-13
1597700
J Neurophysiol. 1993 Nov;70(5):2136-47
8294975
J Neurophysiol. 1994 May;71(5):1848-61
8064352
J Neurosci. 1994 Dec;14(12):7529-40
7996193
Exp Brain Res. 1995;103(1):123-36
7615028
J Physiol. 1995 Aug 15;487(1):243-51
7473253
J Biomech. 1996 Oct;29(10):1365-70
8884483
J Physiol. 1996 Nov 1;496 ( Pt 3):857-71
8930850
J Neurophysiol. 1996 Dec;76(6):3994-4008
8985895
J Neurophysiol. 1995 Oct;74(4):1675-88
8989404
Science. 1997 Feb 21;275(5303):1113-5
9027309
J Biomech. 1997 May;30(5):457-63
9109557
J Physiol. 1998 Feb 15;507 ( Pt 1):277-91
9490851
J Neurophysiol. 1990 Jun;63(6):1297-306
2141632
J Neurophysiol. 1990 Jun;63(6):1307-13
2358878
Prog Brain Res. 1989;80:75-85; discussion 57-60
2634287
J Physiol. 1990 Mar;422:245-64
2141077
J Physiol. 1998 Feb 15;507 ( Pt 1):293-304
9490855
J Neurophysiol. 1998 May;79(5):2265-76
9582203
Exp Brain Res. 1999 Jul;127(2):171-81
10442409
J Physiol. 1962 May;161:357-78
14451214
J Physiol. 1964 Oct;174:132-51
14228608
J Neurophysiol. 2004 Dec;92(6):3233-43
15548636
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Sep;94(3):1699-706
15917323
J Neurophysiol. 2006 Oct;96(4):1772-88
16672301
J Physiol. 1988 Jun;400:101-11
2971105
J Physiol. 2007 Apr 15;580(Pt. 2):649-58
17255169
Brain Res Bull. 2007 Jul 12;73(4-6):155-202
17562384
Nat Neurosci. 2007 Oct;10(10):1329-36
17873869
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2008 Apr;9(4):292-303
18319728
J Physiol. 2000 Sep 1;527 Pt 2:397-404
10970440
J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000 Aug;10(4):249-53
10969198
Exp Brain Res. 2000 Oct;134(3):301-10
11045355
J Physiol. 2001 Feb 15;531(Pt 1):289-97
11179411
J Physiol. 1971 Oct;218(2):405-31
4256547
J Neurophysiol. 1975 May;38(3):560-71
123950
Brain Res. 1975 May 2;88(2):378-83
125139
J Physiol. 1975 Dec;253(1):175-206
128457
J Physiol. 1977 Jun;267(3):811-38
141497
J Physiol. 1977 Jun;267(3):839-56
141498
J Physiol. 1977 Sep;270(3):835-50
143527
Pflugers Arch. 1977 Dec 12;372(2):131-8
564033
J Physiol. 1978 Mar;276:159-64
148508
J Physiol. 2002 Apr 15;540(Pt 2):635-46
11956349
J Neurosci. 2002 Jul 15;22(14):5803-7
12122040
Experientia. 1967 Dec 15;23(12):1026-7
4229611
Exp Neurol. 1968 Jul;21(3):270-89
5673644
J Physiol. 1969 Feb;200(3):723-43
4237132
J Physiol. 1969 Dec;205(3):677-94
4243390
J Neurophysiol. 1970 Jan;33(1):59-72
4243791
Brain Res. 1981 Jan 5;204(1):209-13
7248748
J Physiol. 1982 Jan;322:167-79
6461756