Genetic structuring and migration patterns of Atlantic bigeye tuna, Thunnus obesus (Lowe, 1839).
BACKGROUND
Large pelagic fishes are generally thought to have little population genetic structuring based on their cosmopolitan distribution, large population sizes and high dispersal capacities. However, gene flow can be influenced by ecological (e.g. homing behaviour) and physical (e.g. present-day ocean currents, past changes in sea temperature and levels) factors. In this regard, Atlantic bigeye tuna shows an interesting genetic structuring pattern with two highly divergent mitochondrial clades (Clades I and II), which are assumed to have been originated during the last Pleistocene glacial maxima. We assess genetic structure patterns of Atlantic bigeye tuna at the nuclear level, and compare them with mitochondrial evidence.


RESULTS
We examined allele size variation of nine microsatellite loci in 380 individuals from the Gulf of Guinea, Canary, Azores, Canada, Indian Ocean, and Pacific Ocean. To investigate temporal stability of genetic structure, three Atlantic Ocean sites were re-sampled a second year. Hierarchical AMOVA tests, RST pairwise comparisons, isolation by distance (Mantel) tests, Bayesian clustering analyses, and coalescence-based migration rate inferences supported unrestricted gene flow within the Atlantic Ocean at the nuclear level, and therefore interbreeding between individuals belonging to both mitochondrial clades. Moreover, departures from HWE in several loci were inferred for the samples of Guinea, and attributed to a Wahlund effect supporting the role of this region as a spawning and nursery area. Our microsatellite data supported a single worldwide panmictic unit for bigeye tunas. Despite the strong Agulhas Current, immigration rates seem to be higher from the Atlantic Ocean into the Indo-Pacific Ocean, but the actual number of individuals moving per generation is relatively low compared to the large population sizes inhabiting each ocean basin.


CONCLUSIONS
Lack of congruence between mt and nuclear evidences, which is also found in other species, most likely reflects past events of isolation and secondary contact. Given the inferred relatively low number of immigrants per generation around the Cape of Good Hope, the proportions of the mitochondrial clades in the different oceans may keep stable, and it seems plausible that the presence of individuals belonging to the mt Clade I in the Atlantic Ocean may be due to extensive migrations that predated the last glaciation.
Gonzalez
Elena G
EG
Department of Biodiversity and Evolutionary Biology, Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales, CSIC, José Gutiérrez Abascal, 2; 28006 Madrid, Spain. eguacimara@vet.ucm.es
Beerli
Peter
P
Zardoya
Rafael
R
D000483:Alleles; D025041:Animal Migration; D000818:Animals; D001267:Atlantic Ocean; D001499:Bayes Theorem; D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial / Q000235:genetics; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D051456:Gene Flow; D014644:Genetic Variation; D005828:Genetics, Population; D042822:Genomic Instability; D019156:Indian Ocean; D018895:Microsatellite Repeats; D008957:Models, Genetic; D010140:Pacific Ocean; D011156:Population Density; D014413:Tuna / Q000235:genetics*
D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2006 May;39(2):404-16
16188460
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2005 Jul;36(1):169-87
15904864
Ann Hum Genet. 1983 Jul;47(3):253-9
6614868
Mol Ecol. 2000 Feb;9(2):221-7
10672166
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Jun 7;272(1568):1129-37
16024374
Mol Ecol. 2007 Jan;16(2):289-304
17217345
Evol Bioinform Online. 2007 Feb 23;1:47-50
19325852
Bioinformatics. 2006 Feb 1;22(3):341-5
16317072
Genetics. 1995 Jan;139(1):457-62
7705646
Ann Eugen. 1951 Mar;15(4):323-54
24540312
Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 May;13(5):202-6
21238268
Mol Ecol. 1999 Sep;8(9):1513-20
10564457
Mol Ecol. 2004 Jan;13(1):67-80
14653789
Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Feb 22;266(1417):347-54
10097396
Mol Ecol. 2006 Oct;15(12):3801-15
17032275
Evolution. 1987 Mar;41(2):385-400
28568763
Mol Ecol. 2004 Nov;13(11):3293-303
15487990
Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2004 Oct;33(1):32-42
15324837
Mol Ecol. 2002 Apr;11(4):771-83
11972763
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Feb 7;267(1440):281-92
10714883
Mol Ecol. 2004 Jul;13(7):1785-98
15189203
Mol Ecol. 2001 Feb;10(2):295-303
11298946
Genetics. 2003 Jun;164(2):781-7
12807796
Mol Ecol. 2001 May;10(5):1179-96
11380876
Genetics. 1999 Jun;152(2):763-73
10353916
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Apr 10;98(8):4563-8
11287657
Genetics. 2000 Dec;156(4):1461-3
11102348
Genetics. 1995 Aug;140(4):1421-30
7498781
Mol Ecol. 2001 Feb;10(2):305-18
11298947
Mol Ecol. 2004 Nov;13(11):3345-56
15487994
Genetics. 2003 Jan;163(1):367-74
12586722
Mol Ecol. 2003 Oct;12(10):2571-83
12969462
Evolution. 1989 Jan;43(1):223-225
28568501
Genetics. 2002 Dec;162(4):2025-35
12524368
Genet Res. 2007 Dec;89(5-6):491-503
18976539
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 Jun 29;344(1310):403-10
7800710
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Mar;23(3):691-700
16364968
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Sep 3;99(18):11742-7
12185245
Genetics. 2007 Apr;175(4):1787-802
17237522
Mol Ecol. 2007 Jan;16(1):115-26
17181725
Genetics. 1992 Jun;131(2):479-91
1644282
Q Rev Biol. 1999 Mar;74(1):21-45
10081813
Genetics. 2002 Jul;161(3):1307-20
12136032
Evol Bioinform Online. 2011;7:55-9
21698091
Nature. 2004 Aug 5;430(7000):661-5
15295596
Biometrics. 1992 Jun;48(2):361-72
1637966
Mol Ecol. 2004 Jul;13(7):1799-814
15189204
Heredity (Edinb). 1999 Feb;82 ( Pt 2):117-25
10098262
Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):945-59
10835412
Genetics. 1996 Nov;144(3):1247-62
8913765
Evolution. 1984 Nov;38(6):1358-1370
28563791
Mol Ecol. 2002 Feb;11(2):155-65
11856418
Genetics. 2003 Aug;164(4):1567-87
12930761