Does methodology matter in eyewitness identification research? The effect of live versus video exposure on eyewitness identification accuracy.
The present study examined the effect of mode of target exposure (live versus video) on eyewitness identification accuracy. Adult participants (N=104) were exposed to a staged crime that they witnessed either live or on videotape. Participants were then asked to rate their stress and arousal levels prior to being presented with either a target-present or -absent simultaneous lineup. Across target-present and -absent lineups, mode of target exposure did not have a significant effect on identification accuracy. However, mode of target exposure was found to have a significant effect on stress and arousal levels. Participants who witnessed the crime live had higher levels of stress and arousal than those who were exposed to the videotaped crime. A higher level of arousal was significantly related to poorer identification accuracy for those in the video condition. For participants in the live condition however, stress and arousal had no effect on eyewitness identification accuracy. Implications of these findings in regards to the generalizability of laboratory-based research on eyewitness testimony to real-life crime are discussed.
Pozzulo
Joanna D
JD
Department of Psychology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1S 5B6. joanna_pozzulo@carleton.ca
Crescini
Charmagne
C
Panton
Tasha
T
D001143:Arousal; D003415:Crime / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000523:psychology; D003416:Criminal Law; D003417:Criminal Psychology; D003657:Decision Making; D005069:Evaluation Studies as Topic; D005555:Forensic Psychiatry / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D035846:Law Enforcement; D013315:Stress, Psychological / Q000523:psychology; D014743:Videotape Recording; D014796:Visual Perception