[Despite all--do we have an appropriate substitute for amalgam?].
The ultimate success or failure of a restored tooth is largely dependent on clinical management. Clinicians may choose from a number of restorative materials, different clinical techniques and cavity preparation procedures. Composite resin has been used for nearly 50 years as a restorative material in dentistry. The use of this material has recently increased as a result of patients' demands for esthetic restorations. Failure of dental restorations is a major concern in dental practice. Replacement of failed restorations constitutes the majority of operative work. Clinicians should be aware of the longevity of, and likely reasons for the failure of, direct posterior restorations. Higher failure rates were observed in resin-based composite restorations as compares amalgam restorations. Secondary caries was the main reason for failure. Posterior interproximal resin-based composite restorations should be considered with caution, and their limited long-term performance should be kept in mind. Patients should be informed about the potential longevity of restorative treatment for posterior teeth as they make decisions about treatment for their oral restorative needs.
Levin
L
L
Department of Oral Rehabilitation, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Samorodnitzky-Naveh
G
G
Coval
M
M
Geiger
S B
SB
D001641:Bicuspid; D003188:Composite Resins / Q000009:adverse effects; D003723:Dental Amalgam; D003731:Dental Caries / Q000209:etiology; D003763:Dental Leakage / Q000209:etiology; D019232:Dental Restoration Failure; D003793:Dental Restoration, Permanent / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D008963:Molar
D003188:Composite Resins; D003723:Dental Amalgam