title: Speech motor learning in profoundly deaf adults.
abstract: Speech production, like other sensorimotor behaviors, relies on multiple sensory inputs--audition, proprioceptive inputs from muscle spindles and cutaneous inputs from mechanoreceptors in the skin and soft tissues of the vocal tract. However, the capacity for intelligible speech by deaf speakers suggests that somatosensory input alone may contribute to speech motor control and perhaps even to speech learning. We assessed speech motor learning in cochlear implant recipients who were tested with their implants turned off. A robotic device was used to alter somatosensory feedback by displacing the jaw during speech. We found that implant subjects progressively adapted to the mechanical perturbation with training. Moreover, the corrections that we observed were for movement deviations that were exceedingly small, on the order of millimeters, indicating that speakers have precise somatosensory expectations. Speech motor learning is substantially dependent on somatosensory input.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, McGill University, 1205 Dr. Penfield Avenue, Montreal, Quebec H3A1B1, Canada.
authors.forename: Sazzad M
authors.initials: SM
authors.lastname: Nasir
authors.forename: David J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Ostry
mesh_terms: D000222:Adaptation, Physiological / Q000502:physiology; D000368:Aged; D001309:Auditory Threshold / Q000502:physiology; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D003054:Cochlear Implants / Q000523:psychology; D003638:Deafness / Q000503:physiopathology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007568:Jaw / Q000294:innervation; D007858:Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009068:Movement / Q000502:physiology*; D012371:Robotics; D013060:Speech / Q000502:physiology*; D013061:Speech Acoustics
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Apr;121(4):2296-311
references.pmid: 17471743
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1983 Oct;74(4):1297-9
references.pmid: 6643845
references.citation: J Laryngol Otol. 1982 Feb;96(2):101-12
references.pmid: 7057081
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2006 Oct 10;16(19):1918-23
references.pmid: 17027488
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2005 Oct 11;15(19):1768-72
references.pmid: 16213825
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1990 Nov;88(5):2099-114
references.pmid: 2269726
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 1994 Jul;72(1):299-313
references.pmid: 7965013
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1996 Aug;100(2 Pt 1):1093-104
references.pmid: 8759962
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Aug;120(2):966-77
references.pmid: 16938984
references.citation: Brain Lang. 2006 Mar;96(3):280-301
references.pmid: 16040108
references.citation: Ear Hear. 1999 Oct;20(5):375-92
references.pmid: 10526860
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 Apr;119(4):2372-81
references.pmid: 16642850
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Mar;97(3):1865-73
references.pmid: 7699168
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Oct;122(4):2306-19
references.pmid: 17902866
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Jan 24;415(6870):429-33
references.pmid: 11807554
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2003 Aug 6;23(18):6982-92
references.pmid: 12904459
references.citation: Science. 1998 Feb 20;279(5354):1213-6
references.pmid: 9469813
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1994 May;14(5 Pt 2):3208-24
references.pmid: 8182467
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1991 Jun;89(6):2895-904
references.pmid: 1918629
references.citation: J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Sep;92(3):1284-300
references.pmid: 1401516
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Jun 19;423(6942):866-9
references.pmid: 12815431