Spatial pattern formation facilitates eradication of infectious diseases.
Control of animal-born diseases is a major challenge faced by applied ecologists and public health managers. To improve cost-effectiveness, the effort required to control such pathogens needs to be predicted as accurately as possible. In this context, we reviewed the anti-rabies vaccination schemes applied around the world during the past 25 years.We contrasted predictions from classic approaches based on theoretical population ecology (which governs rabies control to date) with a newly developed individual-based model. Our spatially explicit approach allowed for the reproduction of pattern formation emerging from a pathogen's spread through its host population.We suggest that a much lower management effort could eliminate the disease than that currently in operation. This is supported by empirical evidence from historic field data. Adapting control measures to the new prediction would save one-third of resources in future control programmes.The reason for the lower prediction is the spatial structure formed by spreading infections in spatially arranged host populations. It is not the result of technical differences between models.Synthesis and applications. For diseases predominantly transmitted by neighbourhood interaction, our findings suggest that the emergence of spatial structures facilitates eradication. This may have substantial implications for the cost-effectiveness of existing disease management schemes, and suggests that when planning management strategies consideration must be given to methods that reflect the spatial nature of the pathogen-host system.
Eisinger
Dirk
D
UFZ-Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research UFZ, Department of Ecological Modelling (OESA) Permoserstr. 15, 04318 Leipzig, Germany.
Thulke
Hans-Hermann
HH
BMC Infect Dis. 2004 Mar 09;4:9
15113448
Epidemiol Rev. 1980;2:71-96
7000539
BMC Infect Dis. 2005 Mar 07;5:10
15752423
Parassitologia. 1988 Jan-Apr;30(1):53-7
3268773
Nature. 1986 Jul 24-30;322(6077):304-5
3736658
J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2003 Dec;50(10):477-83
14720184
Vet Rec. 1996 Jul 13;139(2):32-5
8839488
Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Apr 22;264(1381):495-503
9149424
Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr. 1985 Aug 1;98(8):279-81
4052007
Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Sep;20(9):511-9
16701428
Vet Rec. 1994 Jan 15;134(3):55-9
8135014
Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 1982;5(1-3):247-56
7128079
Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Aug 7;267(1452):1575-82
11007334
J Vet Med B Infect Dis Vet Public Health. 2004 Dec;51(10):433-7
15606866
Adv Virus Res. 1977;21:1-36
324250
Bull World Health Organ. 1981;59(2):269-79
6972818
Prev Vet Med. 1999 Oct 19;47(1-2):1-21
11018731
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1996 Nov 29;351(1347):1615-21
8962442
Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Jun 1;16(6):295-300
11369107
J Wildl Dis. 2006 Apr;42(2):459-65
16870876
Science. 2005 Nov 11;310(5750):987-91
16284171
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Nov;14(5):481-98
10344914
Med Pregl. 1998;51 Suppl 1:9-15
9769649
Nature. 1981 Feb 26;289(5800):765-71
7464941
Prev Vet Med. 2001 Sep 20;51(1-2):95-109
11530197
Onderstepoort J Vet Res. 1993 Dec;60(4):357-63
7777320
Proc Biol Sci. 1998 May 22;265(1399):839-46
9633109