Radiation dose to the fetus for pregnant patients undergoing multidetector CT imaging: Monte Carlo simulations estimating fetal dose for a range of gestational age and patient size.
OBJECTIVE
To use Monte Carlo simulations of a current-technology multidetector computed tomographic (CT) scanner to investigate fetal radiation dose resulting from an abdominal and pelvic examination for a range of actual patient anatomies that include variation in gestational age and maternal size.


METHODS
Institutional review board approval was obtained for this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study. Twenty-four models of maternal and fetal anatomy were created from image data from pregnant patients who had previously undergone clinically indicated CT examination. Gestational age ranged from less than 5 weeks to 36 weeks. Simulated helical scans of the abdominal and pelvic region were performed, and a normalized dose (in milligrays per 100 mAs) was calculated for each fetus. Stepwise multiple linear regression was performed to analyze the correlation of dose with gestational age and anatomic measurements of maternal size and fetal location. Results were compared with several existing fetal dose estimation methods.


RESULTS
Normalized fetal dose estimates from the Monte Carlo simulations ranged from 7.3 to 14.3 mGy/100 mAs, with an average of 10.8 mGy/100 mAs. Previous methods yielded values of 10-14 mGy/100 mAs. The correlation between gestational age and fetal dose was not significant (P = .543). Normalized fetal dose decreased linearly with increasing patient perimeter (R(2) = 0.681, P < .001), and a two-factor model with patient perimeter and fetal depth demonstrated a strong correlation with fetal dose (R(2) = 0.799, P < .002).


CONCLUSIONS
A method for the estimation of fetal dose from models of actual patient anatomy that represented a range of gestational age and patient size was developed. Fetal dose correlated with maternal perimeter and varied more than previously recognized. This correlation improves when maternal size and fetal depth are combined.
Angel
Erin
E
Department of Radiology, David A. Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, 924 Westwood Blvd, Suite 650, Los Angeles, CA 90024, USA. EAngel@mednet.ucla.edu
Wellnitz
Clinton V
CV
Goodsitt
Mitchell M
MM
Yaghmai
Nazanin
N
DeMarco
John J
JJ
Cagnon
Christopher H
CH
Sayre
James W
JW
Cody
Dianna D
DD
Stevens
Donna M
DM
Primak
Andrew N
AN
McCollough
Cynthia H
CH
McNitt-Gray
Michael F
MF
D005260:Female; D005333:Fetus / Q000528:radiation effects*; D005865:Gestational Age; D006801:Humans; D009010:Monte Carlo Method; D010388:Pelvis / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D011247:Pregnancy; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D011860:Radiography, Abdominal; D011874:Radiometry; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Br J Radiol. 1999 Apr;72(856):363-70
10474497
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Mar;186(3):871-6
16498123
Med Phys. 1998 Jan;25(1):1-11
9472820
Med Phys. 1981 Jul-Aug;8(4):488-95
7322067
J Nucl Med. 1969 Aug;:Suppl 3:7-52
5802194
Phys Med Biol. 2006 Oct 21;51(20):5151-66
17019030
Med Phys. 2007 May;34(5):1858-73
17555267
Phys Med Biol. 2005 Sep 7;50(17):3989-4004
16177525
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990 Jan;154(1):185-90
2104708
Radiographics. 2007 Jul-Aug;27(4):909-17; discussion 917-8
17620458
Phys Med Biol. 2007 May 7;52(9):2583-97
17440254
Phys Med Biol. 2003 Aug 21;48(16):2645-63
12974580
Rofo. 2002 Dec;174(12):1570-6
12471531
Med Phys. 2004 Sep;31(9):2491-7
15487729
Radiographics. 2002 Nov-Dec;22(6):1541-53
12432127