title: Perceptual and attentional factors in encoding irrelevant spatial information.
abstract: Numerous studies found superior performance when the irrelevant location of a stimulus and response location were corresponding than when they were not corresponding (Simon effect), suggesting that stimulus location is processed in an obligatory manner. The present study compared Simon effects from the location of a relevant (i.e., to-be-attended) object to those from the location of an irrelevant (i.e., to-be-ignored) object. In four experiments, participants were presented with a rectangular frame and a square, with the relevant object in green or red color and the irrelevant object in gray or white color. Participants' task was to respond with a lateral keypress to the color of the relevant object, and we varied spatial correspondence between the location of the relevant or the irrelevant object and the response, respectively. Results consistently showed larger Simon effects from the location of the relevant than from the irrelevant object, even when the irrelevant object was made very salient. These results suggest that location processing is largely confined to relevant (i.e., attended) objects, stressing the role of attention shifts for location encoding.
authors.affiliation: Institut für Psychologie I, Friedrich-Alexander Universität, Kochstrasse 4, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. peter.wuehr@psy.phil.uni-erlangen.de
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Wühr
authors.forename: Rupert
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Biebl
authors.forename: Carlo
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Umiltà
authors.forename: Jochen
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Müsseler
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000704:Analysis of Variance; D001288:Attention; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011930:Reaction Time; D013028:Space Perception
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2003 Sep;31(6):983-94
references.pmid: 14651304
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1991 Sep;50(3):267-84
references.pmid: 1754368
references.citation: Psychol Res. 1993;55(3):208-22
references.pmid: 8416040
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1990 Apr;97(2):253-70
references.pmid: 2186425
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2000 Feb;62(2):321-32
references.pmid: 10723211
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1990 Feb;16(1):121-34
references.pmid: 2137514
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2006 Nov;70(6):459-67
references.pmid: 16184396
references.citation: Psychol Res. 1994;56(3):144-50
references.pmid: 8008776
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 Aug;18(3):837-48
references.pmid: 1500879
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1970 Nov;86(2):272-4
references.pmid: 5496384
references.citation: Psychol Res. 1995;58(3):193-205
references.pmid: 8570787
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 1999 Jun;6(2):204-23
references.pmid: 12199208
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol. 1980 Feb;32(1):3-25
references.pmid: 7367577
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Gen. 1984 Dec;113(4):501-17
references.pmid: 6240521