The influence of coil-skull distance on transcranial magnetic stimulation motor-evoked responses.
We have investigated the effects of changing the coil-to-skull distance on the motor-evoked responses (MEP) induced with two different magnetic stimulator coils (80 mm round and figure-of-eight coil) at rest and during voluntary muscle contraction. The changes in MEP latency, amplitude and silent period (SP) duration induced by stimulation directly upon the skull, and 1 cm away from the skull were analyzed by computing the probability density distribution (PDD) for the responses obtained from all subjects. This measure corresponds to the finite probability that the event occurs within a given area. Overall, the results were consistent with a distance-induced decrease in magnetic field strength. However, the increase in coil-to-skull distance induced a higher probability of longer latencies in active muscle when stimulating with either coil. Also, stimulating at a distance with the figure-of-eight coil increased the probability of a longer SP duration. The stimulation strength at the two distances was comparable because it was set based on the motor threshold obtained for each distance. Therefore, our results are not entirely compatible with the established exponential drop in magnetic field with increasing distance. Rather, they suggest that a more complex set of interactions occurs in the cortex. The results imply that distinct patterns of cortical network activation may exist related to the distance-induced alterations when the coil is moved away from the skull. Further studies are required to elucidate the precise nature of the distance-related interactions of the magnetic field with the cortex.
Cukic
M
M
Department of Neurophysiology, Institute for Medical Research, Belgrade, PO Box 11121, Serbia.
Kalauzi
A
A
Ilic
T
T
Miskovic
M
M
Ljubisavljevic
M
M
D000328:Adult; D019054:Evoked Potentials, Motor / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006225:Hand / Q000294:innervation / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009044:Motor Cortex / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000502:physiology*; D009119:Muscle Contraction / Q000502:physiology; D018482:Muscle, Skeletal / Q000294:innervation / Q000502:physiology; D009431:Neural Conduction / Q000502:physiology; D011712:Pyramidal Tracts / Q000502:physiology; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology; D012886:Skull / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D013997:Time Factors; D050781:Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2000 Summer;12(3):376-84
10956572
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 Aug;91(2):79-92
7519144
J Physiol. 1994 Jun 1;477(Pt 2):223-35
7932215
Neurosurgery. 1987 Jan;20(1):74-93
3543727
J Physiol. 1993 Oct;470:383-93
8068071
J Clin Neurophysiol. 1992 Jan;9(1):132-6
1552001
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2002 Jun;59(6):560-1
12044199
Clin Neurophysiol. 2007 Jul;118(7):1617-25
17524764
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1999;51:120-6
10590942
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998 Oct;109(5):397-401
9851296
J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2001 Fall;13(4):459-70
11748315
Neurosci Lett. 2004 Jan 9;354(2):91-4
14698446
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1990 Apr;75(4):350-7
1691084
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1994 Feb;93(1):42-8
7511521
J Clin Neurophysiol. 1991 Jan;8(1):10-25
2019644
J Physiol. 1998 Apr 15;508 ( Pt 2):625-33
9508823
Biol Psychiatry. 2001 Mar 1;49(5):454-9
11274657
Exp Physiol. 1991 Mar;76(2):159-200
2059424
Phys Med. 2008 Jun;24(2):80-6
18296093