The selectivity of K+ ion channels: testing the hypotheses.
How K(+) channels are able to conduct certain cations yet not others remains an important but unresolved question. The recent elucidation of the structure of NaK, an ion channel that conducts both Na(+) and K(+) ions, offers an opportunity to test the various hypotheses that have been put forward to explain the selectivity of K(+) ion channels. We test the snug-fit, field-strength, and over-coordination hypotheses by comparing their predictions to the results of classical molecular dynamics simulations of the K(+) selective channel KcsA and the less selective channel NaK embedded in lipid bilayers. Our results are incompatible with the so-called strong variant of the snug-fit hypothesis but are consistent with the over-coordination hypothesis and neither confirm nor refute the field-strength hypothesis. We also find that the ions and waters in the NaK selectivity filter unexpectedly move to a new conformation in seven K(+) simulations: the two K(+) ions rapidly move from site S4 to S2 and from the cavity to S4. At the same time, the selectivity filter narrows around sites S1 and S2 and the carbonyl oxygen atoms rotate 20 degrees -40 degrees inwards toward the ion. These motions diminish the large structural differences between the crystallographic structures of the selectivity filters of NaK and KcsA and appear to allow the binding of ions to S2 of NaK at physiological temperature.
Fowler
Philip W
PW
Department of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Tai
Kaihsu
K
Sansom
Mark S P
MS
D000595:Amino Acid Sequence; D008024:Ligands; D008958:Models, Molecular; D011188:Potassium / Q000378:metabolism; D015221:Potassium Channels / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism*; D012964:Sodium / Q000378:metabolism; D013379:Substrate Specificity
D008024:Ligands; D015221:Potassium Channels; D012964:Sodium; D011188:Potassium
Biophys Chem. 2006 Dec 1;124(3):292-301
16737771
J Mol Graph. 1996 Dec;14(6):354-60, 376
9195488
Biophys J. 2000 Feb;78(2):557-70
10653771
J Mol Graph. 1996 Feb;14(1):33-8, 27-8
8744570
J Mol Biol. 1993 Dec 5;234(3):779-815
8254673
Nature. 2001 Nov 1;414(6859):73-7
11689945
J Gen Physiol. 1972 Nov;60(5):588-608
4644327
Biophys J. 2008 Mar 1;94(5):1689-98
18024500
Proteins. 2007 Apr 1;67(1):31-40
17243153
Nature. 2001 Nov 1;414(6859):43-8
11689936
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 6;101(14):4793-8
15051877
Science. 1998 Apr 3;280(5360):69-77
9525859
J Comput Chem. 2005 Dec;26(16):1701-18
16211538
Biophys J. 2007 Jul 1;93(1):44-53
17434934
Biophys J. 2007 Aug 15;93(4):1093-9
17513348
FEBS Lett. 2000 Jul 14;477(1-2):37-42
10899307
Nature. 2000 Apr 20;404(6780):881-4
10786795
Biophys J. 2000 Jun;78(6):2900-17
10827971
Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2006 Apr;13(4):311-8
16532009
J Comput Chem. 2005 Dec;26(16):1781-802
16222654
Eur Biophys J. 2004 May;33(3):238-46
14574522
J Phys Chem B. 1998 Apr 30;102(18):3586-616
24889800
Science. 2005 Dec 2;310(5753):1461-5
16322449
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Sep 25;104(39):15334-9
17878296
Biophys J. 2007 Oct 15;93(8):2635-43
17573427
Biophys J. 2003 Apr;84(4):2345-56
12668443
Nature. 2006 Mar 23;440(7083):570-4
16467789
J Gen Physiol. 2007 Feb;129(2):135-43
17227917
PLoS Biol. 2007 May;5(5):e121
17472437
J Gen Physiol. 2004 Dec;124(6):679-90
15572347
Nature. 2004 Oct 14;431(7010):830-4
15483608
Biophys J. 1962 Mar;2(2 Pt 2):259-323
13889686
J Gen Physiol. 2001 Sep;118(3):303-14
11524460
J Mol Biol. 2008 Feb 8;376(1):13-22
18155244
Structure. 2005 Apr;13(4):591-600
15837197
J Chem Phys. 2006 Jul 14;125(2):24701
16848598
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 May 29;104(22):9260-5
17519335