Stanford University Network for Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity (SUNDROP): 18-month experience with telemedicine screening.
OBJECTIVE
To report the 18-month experience of the Stanford University Network for Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity (SUNDROP) telemedicine initiative.


METHODS
Retrospective analysis of the SUNDROP archival data between 1 December 2005 and 30 May 2007, evaluating this new diagnostic technology for ROP screening.


METHODS
All 97 consecutively enrolled infants in the SUNDROP network.


METHODS
All patients were screened using the RetCam II, and evaluated by the SUNDROP reading center at Stanford University. Nurses were trained to obtain five images in each eye. All patients were screened by an ophthalmologist trained in diagnosing ROP within 1 week of discharge from the hospital.


METHODS
Outcomes included referral-warranted disease, need for treatment, and anatomic outcomes. Referral-warranted disease was defined as any Early Treatment Retinopathy of Prematurity Disease Type 2 or greater, threshold disease, any plus disease, and any stage 4 or higher disease.


RESULTS
In the initial 18-month period, the SUNDROP telemedicine screening initiative has not missed any referral-warranted disease for ROP. A total of 97 infants (194 eyes) were enrolled, resulting in 443 unique examinations and 4,929 unique images. The mean birth weight of the infants was 1,186.9 grams, with a mean gestational age at birth of 28.9 weeks. Seven infants were identified with referral-warranted disease; six patients underwent laser photocoagulation and completely regressed. The one remaining patient regressed spontaneously, and did not require intervention. Calculated sensitivity and specificity was 100% and 98.9% respectively. No patient progressed to retinal detachment or other adverse outcome. Inadequate exposure, artifact, poor visualization of the periphery, and lack of a complete standardized image set in some patients were identified as areas requiring further assessment.


CONCLUSIONS
The SUNDROP telemedicine screening initiative for ROP has proven to have a high degree of sensitivity and specificity for identification of referral-warranted disease. Training was easily implemented. All cases of referral-warranted disease were captured. There were no adverse outcomes.
Silva
Ruwan A
RA
Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA.
Murakami
Yohko
Y
Jain
Atul
A
Gandhi
Jarel
J
Lad
Eleonora M
EM
Moshfeghi
Darius M
DM
D003941:Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological / Q000592:standards*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D007234:Infant, Premature; D008297:Male; D017283:Neonatal Nursing / Q000379:methods*; D015997:Neonatal Screening / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards*; D012017:Referral and Consultation; D012178:Retinopathy of Prematurity / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000451:nursing*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D017216:Telemedicine / Q000592:standards*
Ophthalmology. 2000 Jan;107(1):25-8
10647714
Minerva Pediatr. 2003 Feb;55(1):1-13
12660621
Arch Ophthalmol. 2007 Nov;125(11):1531-8
17998515
Acta Paediatr. 2007 Mar;96(3):338-41
17407452
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;:126-30
16779015
Retina. 2008 Mar;28(3 Suppl):S1-2
18317337
Early Hum Dev. 2005 Apr;81(4):355-60
15814220
Ophthalmology. 2002 Mar;109(3):595-601
11874767
Stud Health Technol Inform. 1999;64:155-63
10747534
Ophthalmology. 2004 Oct;111(10):1894-8
15465553
Ophthalmology. 1991 May;98(5 Suppl):786-806
2062513
JAMA. 1999 Mar 24-31;281(12):1066-8
10188642
BMJ. 1990 Apr 7;300(6729):916-8
2110841
Retina. 2006 Sep;26(7 Suppl):S4-10
16946677
Arch Pediatr. 2003 Aug;10(8):694-9
12922001
Arch Ophthalmol. 2005 May;123(5):621-6
15883280
Ophthalmology. 2002 May;109(5):928-34; discussion 935
11986099
Radiology. 1991 May;179(2):463-8
2014293
J AAPOS. 2006 Apr;10(2):107-11
16678743
Am J Ophthalmol. 2008 Mar;145(3):548-555
18207120
Ophthalmology. 2003 Nov;110(11):2113-7
14597517
Annu Rev Public Health. 2000;21:613-37
10884967
Arch Ophthalmol. 2001 Aug;119(8):1110-8
11483076
Ophthalmology. 2000 Nov;107(11):1999-2005
11054321
Br J Ophthalmol. 1996 May;80(5):425-8
8695564
Ann Intern Med. 1998 Jul 15;129(2):123-7
9669971
Ophthalmology. 2000 Feb;107(2):324-7; discussion 328
10690834
Ophthalmology. 2006 Sep;113(9):1547-52
16828505
Radiology. 1992 Aug;184(2):409-14
1620838
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2007 May;18(3):228-34
17435431
Am J Ophthalmol. 2005 Aug;140(2):214-22
16086945
J AAPOS. 2007 Apr;11(2):208-10; author reply 210
17307000
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Spring;20(2):201-13
15209180
Telemed J. 1995 Summer;1(2):133-49
10165332
J Telemed Telecare. 2002;8(1):52-5
11809086
Pediatrics. 1993 May;91(5):859-66
8474803
Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Mar;124(3):322-7
16534051
Radiology. 2001 May;219(2):475-83
11323475
Arch Ophthalmol. 2003 Dec;121(12):1684-94
14662586
Ophthalmology. 1985 Aug;92(8):987-94
3840244
Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 2000;98:145-50; discussion 150-1
11190018
Pediatrics. 2006 Feb;117(2):572-6
16452383
J AAPOS. 2002 Apr;6(2):64-70
11997800
West J Med. 2001 Mar;174(3):158-9
11238333
Ophthalmology. 2002 May;109(5):936-41
11986101
Br J Ophthalmol. 2000 Dec;84(12):1383-6
11090478
Pediatrics. 2006 Dec;118(6):2322-5
17142514
Arch Ophthalmol. 2001 Feb;119(2):268-72
11176990
Pediatrics. 2001 Sep;108(3):809-11
11533356
Pediatrics. 1998 Jul;102(1 Pt 1):31-4
9651410
Retina. 2008 Mar;28(3 Suppl):S47-54
18317345
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2006 Mar;54(1):35-8
16531668
Arch Ophthalmol. 1984 Aug;102(8):1130-4
6547831