title: Investigating children as cultural magnets: do young children transmit redundant information along diffusion chains?
abstract: The primary goal of this study was to investigate cultural transmission in young children, with specific reference to the phenomenon of overimitation. Diffusion chains were used to compare the imitation of 2- and 3-year-olds on a task in which the initial child in each chain performed a series of relevant and irrelevant actions on a puzzle box in order to retrieve a reward. Children in the chains witnessed the actions performed on one of two boxes, one which was transparent and so the lack of causality of the irrelevant actions was obvious, while the other was opaque and so the lack of causal relevance was not obvious. Unlike previous dyadic research in which children overimitate a model, the irrelevant actions were parsed out early in the diffusion chains. Even though children parsed out irrelevant actions, they showed fidelity to the method used to perform a relevant action both within dyads and across groups. This was true of 3-year-olds, and also 2-year-olds, therefore extending findings from previous research.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Durham University, Science Laboratories, Durham, UK. e.g.flynn@durham.ac.uk
authors.forename: Emma
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Flynn
mesh_terms: D000367:Age Factors; D002675:Child, Preschool; D003210:Concept Formation; D006801:Humans; D007100:Imitative Behavior; D033181:Information Dissemination; D007858:Learning / Q000502:physiology*; D002666:Psychology, Child
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 2008 Dec;101(4):228-40
references.pmid: 18639887
references.citation: Perspect Biol Med. 2003 Spring;46(2):283-96
references.pmid: 12721526
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2005 May;8(3):279-98
references.pmid: 15819758
references.citation: Primates. 2005 Apr;46(2):91-102
references.pmid: 15378423
references.citation: Science. 1978 Nov 24;202(4370):899-901
references.pmid: 17752463
references.citation: Folia Primatol (Basel). 1972;17(3):161-70
references.pmid: 5031297
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):19751-6
references.pmid: 18056814
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Nov 12;363(1509):3489-501
references.pmid: 18801720
references.citation: Artif Life. 2005 Winter-Spring;11(1-2):31-62
references.pmid: 15811219
references.citation: Anim Behav. 2000 Aug;60(2):175-180
references.pmid: 10973718
references.citation: Behav Brain Sci. 2005 Oct;28(5):675-91; discussion 691-735
references.pmid: 16262930
references.citation: Anim Cogn. 2005 Jul;8(3):151-63
references.pmid: 15490290
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Nov 12;363(1509):3477-88
references.pmid: 18799418
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2008 Nov 12;363(1509):3529-39
references.pmid: 18799419
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Sep 29;437(7059):737-40
references.pmid: 16113685
references.citation: Anim Cogn. 2005 Jul;8(3):164-81
references.pmid: 15549502
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2006 Nov;9(6):574-82
references.pmid: 17059454
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 2006 Aug;120(3):303-13
references.pmid: 16893268
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 2006 Jul;42(4):723-31
references.pmid: 16802904
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 5;105(31):10681-6
references.pmid: 18667697
references.citation: Br J Soc Psychol. 2000 Dec;39 Pt 4:521-35
references.pmid: 11190683
references.citation: Dev Sci. 2005 Jan;8(1):F13-20
references.pmid: 15647059
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 2006 May;42(3):555-65
references.pmid: 16756445
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Feb 14;415(6873):755
references.pmid: 11845198
references.citation: Anim Behav. 1965 Oct;13(4):470-4
references.pmid: 5882805
references.citation: Cogn Neuropsychol. 2005 May;22(3):419-32
references.pmid: 21038259
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 12;103(37):13878-83
references.pmid: 16938863