Effects of variation in perfusion rates and of perfusion models in computational models of radio frequency tumor ablation.
OBJECTIVE
Finite element method (FEM) models are commonly used to simulate radio frequency (RF) tumor ablation. Prior FEM models of RF ablation have either ignored the temperature dependent effect of microvascular perfusion, or implemented the effect using simplified algorithms to reduce computational complexity. In this FEM modeling study, the authors compared the effect of different microvascular perfusion algorithms on ablation zone dimensions with two commercial RF electrodes in hepatic tissue. They also examine the effect of tissue type and inter-patient variation of perfusion on ablation zone dimensions.


METHODS
The authors created FEM models of an internally cooled and multi-tined expandable electrode. RF voltage was applied to both electrodes (for 12 or 15 min, respectively) such that the maximum temperature in the model was 105 degrees C. Temperature dependent microvascular perfusion was implemented using three previously reported methodologies: cessation above 60 degrees C, a standard first-order Arrhenius model with decreasing perfusion with increasing degree of vascular stasis, and an Arrhenius model that included the effects of increasing perfusion at the ablation zone boundary due to hyperemia. To examine the effects of interpatient variation, simulations were performed with base line and +/-1 standard deviation values of perfusion. The base line perfusion was also varied to simulate the difference between normal and cirrhotic liver tissue.


RESULTS
The ablation zone volumes with the cessation above 60 degrees C perfusion algorithm and with the more complex Arrhenius model were up to 70% and 25% smaller, respectively, compared to the standard Arrhenius model. Ablation zone volumes were up to 175% and approximately 100% different between the simulations where -1 and +1 standard deviation values of perfusion were used in normal and cirrhotic liver tissue, respectively.


CONCLUSIONS
The choice of microvascular perfusion algorithm has significant effects on final ablation zone dimensions in FEM models of RF ablation. The authors also found that both interpatient variation in base line tissue perfusion and the reduction in perfusion due to cirrhosis have considerable effect on ablation zone dimensions.
Schutt
David J
DJ
Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina 29425, USA.
Haemmerich
Dieter
D
D000465:Algorithms; D001783:Blood Flow Velocity / Q000502:physiology; D017115:Catheter Ablation / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D003198:Computer Simulation; D004566:Electrodes; D020342:Finite Element Analysis; D006801:Humans; D008113:Liver Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery; D008954:Models, Biological; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D010477:Perfusion; D011846:Radio Waves; D013696:Temperature; D014463:Ultrasonography
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001 Jan;13(1):57-63
11169804
Biomed Eng Online. 2004 Aug 06;3(1):27
15298708
Br J Cancer. 2005 May 23;92(10):1825-9
15870717
Int J Hyperthermia. 2005 May;21(3):199-213
16019848
Int J Hyperthermia. 2003 Jul-Aug;19(4):414-30
12850927
J Biomech Eng. 2007 Jun;129(3):354-64
17536902
Radiology. 1998 Dec;209(3):761-7
9844671
Int J Hyperthermia. 2007 Feb;23(1):49-58
17575723
Ann Biomed Eng. 2007 Aug;35(8):1391-403
17436111
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2003 Dec;29(10):867-78
14624780
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2000 Sep;38(5):562-8
11094815
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Jan;178(1):47-51
11756085
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2002 Jan;49(1):3-9
11797653
J Appl Physiol. 1948 Aug;1(2):93-122
18887578
Ann Acad Med Singap. 2006 Dec;35(12):851-7
17218995
Ann Biomed Eng. 2000 Sep;28(9):1075-84
11132191
Med Phys. 1996 Jul;23(7):1287-98
8839425
Eur Radiol. 2003 Oct;13(10):2346-52
12942277
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1998 Jan-Feb;8(1):121-7
9500271
Hepatology. 2005 May;41(5):1130-7
15841454
Int J Hyperthermia. 1992 Jul-Aug;8(4):501-14
1402130
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2006 Mar-Apr;25(2):66-70
16763333
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001 Oct;12(10):1193-201
11585886
Phys Med Biol. 2003 Nov 7;48(21):3595-610
14653565
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2001 Jul;48(7):821-9
11442294
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2003 Apr;50(4):493-500
12723061
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2007;45(9):1169-79
17635075
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1998 Jan-Feb;9(1 Pt 1):101-11
9468403
Biomed Eng Online. 2006 Apr 18;5:24
16620380
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Jan;176(1):3-16
11133529
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2003 May;41(3):317-23
12803297
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Mar;182(3):657-61
14975966
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001 Mar;176(3):667-73
11222202
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1984 Jan;31(1):9-16
6724614
Radiology. 2005 Jul;236(1):132-9
15987969
Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007 Jun;10(2):102-13
18070688
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2001 Oct;48(10):1145-52
11585038
Biomed Eng Online. 2003 May 08;2:12
12780939
Abdom Imaging. 2005 Jul-Aug;30(4):442-50
16132440
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1994 Feb;41(2):97-107
8026856
Open Biomed Eng J. 2007 Sep 19;1:47-52
19662127
Int J Hyperthermia. 2004 Sep;20(6):567-93
15370815
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2002 Aug;49(8):836-42
12148822
Ann Biomed Eng. 2002;30(9):1152-61
12502226
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Apr;184(4):1347-52
15788622
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 1999 Sep;46(9):1129-38
10493076
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007 Aug;54(8):1382-8
17694858
J Biomech Eng. 1999 Dec;121(6):584-90
10633257