title: Variation in nocturnality and circadian activity rhythms between photoresponsive F344 and nonphotoresponsive Sprague Dawley rats.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Variation in circadian rhythms and nocturnality may, hypothetically, be related to or independent of genetic variation in photoperiodic mediation of seasonal changes in physiology and behavior. We hypothesized that strain variation in photoperiodism between photoperiodic F344 rats and nonphotoperiodic Harlan Sprague Dawley (HSD) rats might be caused by underlying variation in clock function. We predicted that HSD rats would have more activity during the day or subjective day, longer free-running rhythms, poor entrainment to short day length, and shorter duration of activity, traits that have been associated with nonphotoperiodism in other laboratory rodent species, relative to F344 rats. An alternative hypothesis, that differences are due to variation in melatonin secretion or responses to melatonin, predicts either no such differences or inconsistent combinations of differences.
  
  
  METHODS
  We tested these predictions by examining activity rhythms of young male F344 and HSD rats given access to running wheels in constant dark (DD), short day length (L8:D16; SD), and long day length (L16:D8; LD). We compared nocturnality (the proportion of activity during night or subjective night), duration of activity (alpha), activity onset and offset, phase angle of entrainment, and free running rhythms (tau) of F344 and HSD rats.
  
  
  RESULTS
  HSD rats had significantly greater activity during the day, were sometimes arrhythmic in DD, and had significantly longer tau than F344 rats, consistent with predictions. However, HSD rats had significantly longer alpha than F344 rats and both strains entrained to SD, inconsistent with predictions.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The ability of HSD rats to entrain to SD, combined with longer alpha than F344 rats, suggests that the circadian system of HSD rats responds correctly to SD. These data offer best support for the alternative hypothesis, that differences in photoresponsiveness between F344 and HSD rats are caused by non-circadian differences in melatonin secretion or the response to melatonin.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biology, College of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA 23187, USA. pdheid@wm.edu.
authors.forename: Cheryl D
authors.initials: CD
authors.lastname: Seroka
authors.forename: Cynthia E
authors.initials: CE
authors.lastname: Johnson
authors.forename: Paul D
authors.initials: PD
authors.lastname: Heideman
references.citation: J Biol Rhythms. 2001 Aug;16(4):283-301
references.pmid: 11506375
references.citation: J Biol Rhythms. 1997 Dec;12(6):518-27
references.pmid: 9406025
references.citation: Physiol Behav. 1986 Jan;36(1):167-74
references.pmid: 3952177
references.citation: Q Rev Biol. 2001 Sep;76(3):293-325
references.pmid: 11561508
references.citation: Biol Reprod. 1998 Aug;59(2):358-63
references.pmid: 9687308
references.citation: J Biol Rhythms. 2003 Oct;18(5):356-66
references.pmid: 14582852
references.citation: J Biol Rhythms. 2000 Dec;15(6):501-13
references.pmid: 11106067
references.citation: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2007 Mar;292(3):R1315-9
references.pmid: 17110533
references.citation: Physiol Behav. 1997 Nov;62(5):1099-108
references.pmid: 9333206
references.citation: Z Tierpsychol. 1979 Mar;49(3):225-49
references.pmid: 386643
references.citation: Physiol Behav. 1990 Feb;47(2):397-401
references.pmid: 2333353
references.citation: Comp Biochem Physiol A Comp Physiol. 1988;91(3):535-7
references.pmid: 2906835
references.citation: Biol Reprod. 1987 Aug;37(1):22-7
references.pmid: 3651546
references.citation: J Comp Physiol B. 1997 Apr;167(3):185-92
references.pmid: 9151428
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Dec 22;438(7071):1095-6
references.pmid: 16371996
references.citation: J Neuroendocrinol. 2003 Apr;15(4):427-31
references.pmid: 12622845
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A. 2000 Feb;186(2):169-80
references.pmid: 10707315
references.citation: Experientia. 1991 Jun 15;47(6):593-8
references.pmid: 2065757
references.citation: Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2001 Dec;281(6):R1817-24
references.pmid: 11705766
references.citation: Reproduction. 2004 Dec;128(6):857-62
references.pmid: 15579603
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A. 1988 Feb;162(3):309-16
references.pmid: 3351788
references.citation: Biol Reprod. 1997 Jul;57(1):134-8
references.pmid: 9209091
references.citation: Am J Physiol. 1999 Apr;276(4):R1078-86
references.pmid: 10198388
references.citation: Am J Physiol. 1986 Feb;250(2 Pt 2):R199-206
references.pmid: 3946637
references.citation: J Biol Rhythms. 1997 Oct;12(5):423-30
references.pmid: 9376641
references.citation: J Biol Rhythms. 2004 Jun;19(3):180-92
references.pmid: 15155003
references.citation: J Circadian Rhythms. 2005 Sep 14;3:12
references.pmid: 16162292
references.citation: Am J Physiol. 1999 Oct;277(4):R1171-8
references.pmid: 10516259
references.citation: Biol Reprod. 1989 Dec;41(6):1004-13
references.pmid: 2624861
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Mar 22;265(1395):517-21
references.pmid: 9569670
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A. 1986 Jul;159(1):7-11
references.pmid: 3746726
references.citation: Science. 2006 Dec 22;314(5807):1941-4
references.pmid: 17185605
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Mar 22;263(1368):345-50
references.pmid: 8920256
references.citation: BMC Physiol. 2002 Jul 22;2:11
references.pmid: 12135532
references.citation: Endocrinology. 1996 May;137(5):2183-6
references.pmid: 8612567
references.citation: Physiol Behav. 1991 Dec;50(6):1137-43
references.pmid: 1798768
references.citation: J Biol Rhythms. 2000 Jun;15(3):195-207
references.pmid: 10885874
references.citation: Reproduction. 2006 Sep;132(3):379-92
references.pmid: 16940279