Culture, embodiment and genes: unravelling the triple helix.
Much recent work stresses the role of embodiment and action in thought and reason, and celebrates the power of transmitted cultural and environmental structures to transform the problem-solving activity required of individual brains. By apparent contrast, much work in evolutionary psychology has stressed the selective fit of the biological brain to an ancestral environment of evolutionary adaptedness, with an attendant stress upon the limitations and cognitive biases that result. On the face of it, this suggests either a tension or, at least, a mismatch, with the symbiotic dyad of cultural evolution and embodied cognition. In what follows, we explore this mismatch by focusing on three key ideas: cognitive niche construction; cognitive modularity; and the existence (or otherwise) of an evolved universal human nature. An appreciation of the power and scope of the first, combined with consequently more nuanced visions of the latter two, allow us to begin to glimpse a much richer vision of the combined interactive potency of biological and cultural evolution for active, embodied agents.
Wheeler
Michael
M
Department of Philosophy, University of Stirling, Stirling, UK. m.w.wheeler@stir.ac.uk
Clark
Andy
A
D005075:Biological Evolution; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D003468:Cultural Evolution; D006801:Humans; D011340:Problem Solving; D012931:Social Environment
Science. 2005 Feb 18;307(5712):1082-5
15718465
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999 Jun 30;882:119-27; discussion 128-34
10415890
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Jul;2(7):475-83
11433372
Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Mar 1;16(3):128-135
11179576
Behav Brain Sci. 1997 Dec;20(4):723-42; discussion 743-67
10097009
Behav Brain Sci. 2000 Feb;23(1):131-46; discussion 146-75
11303338
Behav Brain Sci. 2008 Jun;31(3):321-31; discussion 331-56
18578929