Are ecosystem services stabilized by differences among species? A test using crop pollination.
Biological diversity could enhance ecosystem service provision by increasing the mean level of services provided, and/or by providing more consistent (stable) services over space and time. Ecological theory predicts that when an ecosystem service is provided by many species, it will be stabilized against disturbance by a variety of 'stabilizing mechanisms.' However, few studies have investigated whether stabilizing mechanisms occur in real landscapes affected by human disturbance. We used two datasets on crop pollination by wild native bees to screen for and differentiate among three stabilizing mechanisms: density compensation (negative co-variance among species' abundances); response diversity (differential response to environmental variables among species); and cross-scale resilience (response to the same environmental variable at different scales by different species). In both datasets, we found response diversity and cross-scale resilience, but not density compensation. We conclude that stabilizing mechanisms may contribute to the stability of pollination services in our study areas, emphasizing the insurance value of seemingly 'redundant' species. Furthermore, the absence of density compensation that we found at the landscape scale contrasts with findings of previous small-scale experimental and modelling work, suggesting that we should not assume that density compensation will stabilize ecosystem services in real landscapes.
Winfree
Rachael
R
Department of Entomology, Rutgers, The State University, 119 Blake Hall, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA. rwinfree@rci.rutgers.edu
Kremen
Claire
C
D000818:Animals; D001516:Bees / Q000502:physiology*; D044822:Biodiversity; D017753:Ecosystem; D054817:Pollination; D011156:Population Density; D013045:Species Specificity
Oecologia. 2007 Sep;153(3):589-96
17483965
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Mar 13;104(11):4461-6
17360546
Ecol Lett. 2007 Apr;10(4):299-314
17355569
Am Nat. 2000 Nov;156(5):534-552
29587515
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 16;96(4):1463-8
9990046
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Dec 24;99(26):16812-6
12486221
Science. 2007 Jul 6;317(5834):58-62
17615333
Nature. 2006 Jun 1;441(7093):629-32
16738658
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 12;103(37):13890-5
16940358
Ecol Lett. 2006 Oct;9(10):1146-56
16972878
Ecol Lett. 2005 May;8(5):468-79
21352450
Am Nat. 1998 Mar;151(3):277-82
18811358
Ecol Lett. 2007 Nov;10(11):1105-13
17877737
Science. 2005 Nov 11;310(5750):1029-31
16239439
Ecol Lett. 2005 May;8(5):538-47
21352458
Proc Biol Sci. 2003 May 7;270(1518):955-61
12803911
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 7;274(1608):303-13
17164193
Ecol Lett. 2008 May;11(5):499-515
18294214
Science. 2004 Nov 12;306(5699):1177-80
15539601
Am Nat. 1998 Mar;151(3):264-76
18811357
Nature. 2004 May 13;429(6988):174-7
15141210