title: Hospital quality, efficiency, and input slack differentials.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To use an advance in data envelopment analysis (DEA) called congestion analysis to assess the trade-offs between quality and efficiency in U.S. hospitals.
  
  
  METHODS
  Urban U.S. hospitals in 34 states operating in 2004.
  
  
  METHODS
  Input and output data from 1,377 urban hospitals were taken from the American Hospital Association Annual Survey and the Medicare Cost Reports. Nurse-sensitive measures of quality came from the application of the Patient Safety Indicator (PSI) module of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Quality Indicator software to State Inpatient Databases (SID) provided by the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP).
  
  
  METHODS
  In the first step of the study, hospitals' relative output-based efficiency was determined in order to obtain a measure of congestion (i.e., the productivity loss due to the occurrence of patient safety events). The outputs were adjusted to account for this productivity loss, and a second DEA was performed to obtain input slack values. Differences in slack values between unadjusted and adjusted outputs were used to measure either relative inefficiency or a need for quality improvement.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Overall, the hospitals in our sample could increase the total amount of outputs produced by an average of 26 percent by eliminating inefficiency. About 3 percent of this inefficiency can be attributed to congestion. Analysis of subsamples showed that teaching hospitals experienced no congestion loss. We found that quality of care could be improved by increasing the number of labor inputs in low-quality hospitals, whereas high-quality hospitals tended to have slack on personnel.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Results suggest that reallocation of resources could increase the relative quality among hospitals in our sample. Further, higher quality in some dimensions of care need not be achieved as a result of higher costs or through reduced access to health care.
authors.affiliation: Department of Health Policy & Public Health, University of the Sciences in Philadelphia, PA, USA.
authors.forename: Vivian G
authors.initials: VG
authors.lastname: Valdmanis
authors.forename: Michael D
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Rosko
authors.forename: Ryan L
authors.initials: RL
authors.lastname: Mutter
mesh_terms: D000573:American Hospital Association; D017598:Efficiency, Organizational; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D006302:Health Services Research; D006760:Hospitalization; D006784:Hospitals, Teaching / Q000592:standards; D006786:Hospitals, Urban / Q000458:organization & administration* / Q000592:standards*; D006801:Humans; D006278:Medicare; D009741:Nursing Staff, Hospital / Q000600:supply & distribution; D009874:Operations Research; D010067:Ownership; D010561:Personnel Staffing and Scheduling; D011382:Programming, Linear; D011785:Quality Assurance, Health Care; D017751:Safety Management; D014481:United States
references.citation: J Health Econ. 1986 Jun;5(2):107-27
references.pmid: 10287222
references.citation: Health Serv Res. 2004 Dec;39(6 Pt 2):2117-34
references.pmid: 15544647
references.citation: Health Econ. 2006 Nov;15(11):1173-86
references.pmid: 16625519
references.citation: Health Care Manag Sci. 2003 Nov;6(4):203-18
references.pmid: 14686627
references.citation: Health Econ. 1999 Sep;8(6):509-20
references.pmid: 10544316
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 1999 Jan 28;340(4):293-9
references.pmid: 9920955
references.citation: Med Care. 1984 Oct;22(10):922-38
references.pmid: 6436590
references.citation: Health Care Manage Rev. 2005 Oct-Dec;30(4):347-60
references.pmid: 16292012
references.citation: J Health Econ. 1994 Oct;13(3):317-22
references.pmid: 10138857
references.citation: Health Care Manag Sci. 2006 May;9(2):181-8
references.pmid: 16895312
references.citation: J Nurs Adm. 2005 Jun;35(6):293-9
references.pmid: 15951704
references.citation: Health Serv Res. 1998 Jun;33(2 Pt 1):163-85
references.pmid: 9618666
references.citation: J Health Econ. 1994 Oct;13(3):255-80; discussion 335-40
references.pmid: 10138854
references.citation: JAMA. 2000 Mar 1;283(9):1159-66
references.pmid: 10703778
references.citation: Nurs Res. 1998 Jan-Feb;47(1):43-50
references.pmid: 9478183
references.citation: Nurs Outlook. 1998 Sep-Oct;46(5):199-200
references.pmid: 9805336
references.citation: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2008 Mar;34(3):154-63
references.pmid: 18419045
references.citation: Health Econ. 2006 Apr;15(4):419-31
references.pmid: 16389631
references.citation: Nurs Econ. 1998 Jul-Aug;16(4):196-203
references.pmid: 9748985
references.citation: Health Care Manag Sci. 2008 Mar;11(1):67-77
references.pmid: 18390169
references.citation: Health Aff (Millwood). 2003 Mar-Apr;22(2):167-77
references.pmid: 12674419