Transformation of different barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cultivars by Agrobacterium tumefaciens infection of in vitro cultured ovules.
Most cultivars of higher plants display poor regeneration capacity of explants due to yet unknown genotypic determined mechanisms. This implies that technologies such as transformation often are restricted to model cultivars with good tissue characteristics. In the present paper, we add further evidence to our previous hypothesis that regeneration from young barley embryos derived from in vitro-cultured ovules is genotype independent. We investigated the ovule culture ability of four cultivars Femina, Salome, Corniche and Alexis, known to have poor response in other types of tissue culture, and compared that to the data for the model cultivar, Golden Promise. Subsequently, we analyzed the transformation efficiencies of the four cultivars using the protocol for Agrobacterium infection of ovules, previously developed for Golden Promise. Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain AGL0, carrying the binary vector pVec8-GFP harboring a hygromycin resistance gene and the green fluorescence protein (GFP) gene, was used for transformation. The results strongly indicate that the tissue culture response level in ovule culture is genotype independent. However, we did observe differences between cultivars with respect to frequencies of GFP-expressing embryos and frequencies of regeneration from the GFP-expressing embryos under hygromycin selection. The final frequencies of transformed plants per ovule were lower for the four cultivars than that for Golden Promise but the differences were not statistically significant. We conclude that ovule culture transformation can be used successfully to transform cultivars other than Golden Promise. Similar to that observed for Golden Promise, the ovule culture technique allows for the rapid and direct generation of high quality transgenic plants.
Holme
Inger Baeksted
IB
Department of Genetics and Biotechnology, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Research Centre Flakkebjerg, University of Aarhus, 4200 Slagelse, Denmark. Inger.Holme@agrsci.dk
Brinch-Pedersen
Henrik
H
Lange
Mette
M
Holm
Preben Bach
PB
D016960:Agrobacterium tumefaciens / Q000235:genetics*; D035264:Flowers / Q000382:microbiology; D018628:Gene Dosage; D015870:Gene Expression; D005822:Genetic Vectors; D049452:Green Fluorescent Proteins / Q000235:genetics; D001467:Hordeum / Q000196:embryology / Q000235:genetics* / Q000382:microbiology; D030821:Plants, Genetically Modified; D010957:Plasmids / Q000235:genetics; D011994:Recombinant Proteins / Q000235:genetics; D046509:Tissue Culture Techniques; D014170:Transformation, Genetic
D011994:Recombinant Proteins; D049452:Green Fluorescent Proteins
J Exp Bot. 2005 Jul;56(417):1913-22
15911560
Plant Cell Rep. 2006 Dec;25(12):1325-35
16832622
Plant J. 2002 Nov;32(3):285-98
12410808
Theor Appl Genet. 2004 Feb;108(4):644-50
14534750
Plant Physiol. 1997 Nov;115(3):971-980
12223854
Plant Physiol. 1994 Jan;104(1):37-48
12232059
Plant Physiol. 1985 Jan;77(1):87-94
16664035
Plant Physiol. 1991 Jan;95(1):52-7
16667980
Theor Appl Genet. 1998 Mar;96(3-4):421-5
24710881
Biotechnology (N Y). 1991 Oct;9(10):963-7
1368724
Nat Biotechnol. 1996 Jun;14(6):745-50
9630983
Plant Biotechnol J. 2006 Mar;4(2):251-61
17177801
Plant Mol Biol. 2000 Jun;43(2-3):179-88
10999403
J Plant Physiol. 2008 Jan;165(1):71-82
17905476
Plant J. 1994 Aug;6(2):271-82
7920717
Trends Biotechnol. 2003 Mar;21(3):95-8
12628361
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jan 18;97(2):948-53
10639185
Plant J. 2003 Jul;35(2):219-36
12848827
Plant Cell. 1997 Mar;9(3):317-33
9090878
Plant Cell Rep. 2004 Jan;22(6):397-402
14530864
Biotechnology (N Y). 1990 Sep;8(9):833-9
1366794