An extension of the coevolution theory of the origin of the genetic code.
BACKGROUND
The coevolution theory of the origin of the genetic code suggests that the genetic code is an imprint of the biosynthetic relationships between amino acids. However, this theory does not seem to attribute a role to the biosynthetic relationships between the earliest amino acids that evolved along the pathways of energetic metabolism. As a result, the coevolution theory is unable to clearly define the very earliest phases of genetic code origin. In order to remove this difficulty, I here suggest an extension of the coevolution theory that attributes a crucial role to the first amino acids that evolved along these biosynthetic pathways and to their biosynthetic relationships, even when defined by the non-amino acid molecules that are their precursors.


RESULTS
It is re-observed that the first amino acids to evolve along these biosynthetic pathways are predominantly those codified by codons of the type GNN, and this observation is found to be statistically significant. Furthermore, the close biosynthetic relationships between the sibling amino acids Ala-Ser, Ser-Gly, Asp-Glu, and Ala-Val are not random in the genetic code table and reinforce the hypothesis that the biosynthetic relationships between these six amino acids played a crucial role in defining the very earliest phases of genetic code origin.


CONCLUSIONS
All this leads to the hypothesis that there existed a code, GNS, reflecting the biosynthetic relationships between these six amino acids which, as it defines the very earliest phases of genetic code origin, removes the main difficulty of the coevolution theory. Furthermore, it is here discussed how this code might have naturally led to the code codifying only for the domains of the codons of precursor amino acids, as predicted by the coevolution theory. Finally, the hypothesis here suggested also removes other problems of the coevolution theory, such as the existence for certain pairs of amino acids with an unclear biosynthetic relationship between the precursor and product amino acids and the collocation of Ala between the amino acids Val and Leu belonging to the pyruvate biosynthetic family, which the coevolution theory considered as belonging to different biosyntheses.


METHODS
This article was reviewed by Rob Knight, Paul Higgs (nominated by Laura Landweber), and Eugene Koonin.
Di Giulio
Massimo
M
Laboratory for Molecular Evolution, Institute of Genetics and Biophysics Adriano Buzzati Traverso, CNR, Via P. Castellino, 111, 80131 Naples, Napoli, Italy. digiulio@igb.cnr.it
D000596:Amino Acids / Q000096:biosynthesis / Q000235:genetics; D003062:Codon / Q000235:genetics; D019143:Evolution, Molecular; D005815:Genetic Code; D008957:Models, Genetic
D000596:Amino Acids; D003062:Codon
J Mol Evol. 1976 Mar 29;7(2):101-4
1263263
J Mol Evol. 1999 Jul;49(1):1-10
10368428
Prog Biophys Mol Biol. 1989;54(1):81-6
2490162
J Mol Evol. 2000 Mar;50(3):258-63
10754069
Orig Life Evol Biosph. 1995 Dec;25(6):549-64
7494635
J Mol Evol. 1997 May;44(5):473-6
9115171
Orig Life Evol Biosph. 2003 Oct;33(4-5):479-89
14604187
J Theor Biol. 1994 Dec 7;171(3):303-8
7532765
Trends Ecol Evol. 1992 Jun;7(6):176-8
21236001
Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai). 2008 Jul;40(7):539-53
18604446
Genome Biol. 2008;9(6):R95
18541022
J Mol Biol. 2008 Mar 28;377(3):831-44
18279892
J Theor Biol. 1974 Mar;44(1):145-60
4207200
J Theor Biol. 1996 Apr 21;179(4):313-22
8763352
J Theor Biol. 2004 Jun 7;228(3):389-96
15135037
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Dec 5;97(25):13690-5
11087835
J Mol Evol. 1999 Mar;48(3):253-5
10627191
Orig Life Evol Biosph. 1996 Dec;26(6):589-609
9008882
Trends Biochem Sci. 2000 Feb;25(2):44
10664578
Microbiol Rev. 1988 Dec;52(4):452-84
3070320
J Mol Evol. 1993 Jul;37(1):5-10
8360919
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 12;103(50):18923-7
17142313
Naturwissenschaften. 1981 Jun;68(6):282-92
7266675
Orig Life Evol Biosph. 1991;21(3):165-76
1724560
J Theor Biol. 1998 Mar 21;191(2):191-6
9735011
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Nov 1;90(21):9916-20
8234335
Orig Life Evol Biosph. 1989;19(1):69-72
2473433
J Mol Evol. 1987;25(1):15-9
3114499
J Mol Evol. 1990 Jan;30(1):7-15
1690303
J Mol Biol. 1968 Dec;38(3):367-79
4887876
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 May;72(5):1909-12
1057181
PLoS Biol. 2007 Jan;5(1):e4
17194211
J Mol Evol. 2001 Apr;52(4):372-82
11343133
J Theor Biol. 1999 Mar 21;197(2):193-205
10074393
J Mol Evol. 1999 Feb;48(2):168-77
9929385
J Mol Evol. 2006 Mar;62(3):340-61
16477524
Nature. 1965 Aug 7;207(997):597-9
5883631
Sci Am. 1981 Apr;244(4):88-92, 96, et passim
6164094
Trends Genet. 1990 May;6(5):145-9
2195724
Orig Life Evol Biosph. 1992;22(5):309-19
1454354
J Mol Evol. 1997 Dec;45(6):571-8
9419234
Biosystems. 1989;22(3):177-87
2650752
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Sep;86(18):7054-8
2476811
Bioessays. 2005 Apr;27(4):416-25
15770677
J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2004 Aug;22(1):1-11
15214800
J Mol Evol. 1998 Jun;46(6):615-21
9608043
J Mol Evol. 2002 Nov;55(5):616-22
12399935
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Dec 27;102(52):19003-8
16380427
J Mol Evol. 2001 Dec;53(6):724-32
11677632
Orig Life Evol Biosph. 2003 Oct;33(4-5):457-77
14604186
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Apr 8;105(14):5285-6
18385375
Orig Life Evol Biosph. 1994 Sep;24(5):425-34
7970630
Physiol Chem Phys Med NMR. 1989;21(3):237-42
2636391
J Mol Evol. 2002 Apr;54(4):530-8
11956691
J Theor Biol. 1997 Aug 21;187(4):573-81
9299300