title: Detection of in situ mammary cancer in a transgenic mouse model: in vitro and in vivo MRI studies demonstrate histopathologic correlation.
abstract: Improving the prevention and detection of preinvasive ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is expected to lower both morbidity and mortality from breast cancer. Transgenic mouse models can be used as a 'test bed' to develop new imaging methods and to evaluate the efficacy of candidate preventive therapies. We hypothesized that despite its microscopic size, early murine mammary cancer, including DCIS, might be accurately detected by MRI. C3(1) SV40 TAg female mice (n=23) between 10 and 18 weeks of age were selected for study. Eleven mice were subjected to in vitro imaging using a T(2)-weighted spin echo sequence and 12 mice were selected for in vivo imaging using a T(1)-weighted gradient echo, a T(2)-weighted spin echo and high spectral and spatial resolution imaging sequences. The imaged glands were carefully dissected, formalin fixed and paraffin embedded, and then H&E stained sections were obtained. The ratio of image-detected versus histologically detected cancers was obtained by reviewing the MR images and H&E sections independently and using histology as the gold standard. MR images were able to detect 12/12 intramammary lymph nodes, 1/1 relatively large (approximately 5 mm) tumor, 17/18 small (approximately 1 mm) tumors and 13/16 ducts distended with DCIS greater than 300 microm. Significantly, there were no false positives--i.e., image detection always corresponded to a histologically detectable cancer in this model. These results indicate that MR imaging can reliably detect both preinvasive in situ and early invasive mammary cancers in mice with high sensitivity. This technology is an important step toward the more effective use of non-invasive imaging in pre-clinical studies of breast cancer prevention, detection and treatment.
authors.affiliation: Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 S Maryland Avenue, MC 2026, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
authors.forename: S A
authors.initials: SA
authors.lastname: Jansen
authors.forename: S D
authors.initials: SD
authors.lastname: Conzen
authors.forename: X
authors.initials: X
authors.lastname: Fan
authors.forename: T
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Krausz
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Zamora
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Foxley
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: River
authors.forename: G M
authors.initials: GM
authors.lastname: Newstead
authors.forename: G S
authors.initials: GS
authors.lastname: Karczmar
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D002277:Carcinoma / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology*; D005240:Feasibility Studies; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008325:Mammary Neoplasms, Experimental / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology*; D051379:Mice; D008822:Mice, Transgenic; D008853:Microscopy
references.citation: Radiology. 2007 Dec;245(3):684-91
references.pmid: 18024450
references.citation: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Apr;17(4):445-54
references.pmid: 12655584
references.citation: Eur J Cancer. 1998 Oct;34(11):1664-9
references.pmid: 9893649
references.citation: Magn Reson Med. 1984 Sep;1(3):370-86
references.pmid: 6571566
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Nov 8;91(23):11236-40
references.pmid: 7972041
references.citation: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006 May;97(2):135-44
references.pmid: 16319971
references.citation: Lancet. 2007 Aug 11;370(9586):485-92
references.pmid: 17693177
references.citation: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Jan;186(1):30-7
references.pmid: 16357373
references.citation: Radiology. 1995 Aug;196(2):415-9
references.pmid: 7617854
references.citation: Oncogene. 2000 Feb 21;19(8):1020-7
references.pmid: 10713685
references.citation: NMR Biomed. 2005 Aug;18(5):285-92
references.pmid: 15973657
references.citation: Radiology. 1997 Feb;202(2):413-20
references.pmid: 9015067
references.citation: Invest Radiol. 2005 Jun;40(6):321-7
references.pmid: 15905717
references.citation: Cell Cycle. 2006 Jan;5(1):113-9
references.pmid: 16340310
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Dec;1002:165-88
references.pmid: 14751834
references.citation: CA Cancer J Clin. 2002 Sep-Oct;52(5):256-76
references.pmid: 12363325
references.citation: MAGMA. 2004 Dec;17(3-6):260-70
references.pmid: 15703983
references.citation: J Nucl Med. 2006 Dec;47(12):1995-9
references.pmid: 17138742
references.citation: Phys Med Biol. 2006 Dec 21;51(24):N451-9
references.pmid: 17148815
references.citation: Cancer Res. 2003 Jun 1;63(11):2723-7
references.pmid: 12782573
references.citation: Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1994 Nov;2(4):673-90
references.pmid: 7489316
references.citation: Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2006 Oct;5(5):537-42
references.pmid: 16981797
references.citation: J Med Chem. 2006 Aug 10;49(16):4926-36
references.pmid: 16884304
references.citation: Cancer. 2004 Jul 1;101(1):3-27
references.pmid: 15221985
references.citation: Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7(6):258-65
references.pmid: 16457701
references.citation: CA Cancer J Clin. 2007 Mar-Apr;57(2):75-89
references.pmid: 17392385
references.citation: Am J Surg. 2006 Aug;192(2):172-8
references.pmid: 16860625
references.citation: Eur J Cancer. 2003 Aug;39(12):1755-60
references.pmid: 12888371
references.citation: J Clin Oncol. 2006 Oct 1;24(28):4603-10
references.pmid: 17008702
references.citation: Breast J. 2005 Nov-Dec;11(6):382-90
references.pmid: 16297080
references.citation: Rofo. 1987 May;146(5):584-90
references.pmid: 3035648
references.citation: Breast Cancer Res. 2005;7(4):R444-54
references.pmid: 15987449
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 2003 Jan 13;163(1):49-56
references.pmid: 12523916
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Aug 3;101(31):11438-43
references.pmid: 15277673
references.citation: Radiology. 2002 Aug;224(2):577-85
references.pmid: 12147859
references.citation: N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 27;353(17):1784-92
references.pmid: 16251534
references.citation: Am J Clin Oncol. 2006 Jun;29(3):305-10
references.pmid: 16755185
references.citation: J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 May;19(5):570-9
references.pmid: 15112306