title: Neighborhood structural inequality, collective efficacy, and sexual risk behavior among urban youth.
abstract: We draw on collective efficacy theory to extend a contextual model of early adolescent sexual behavior. Specifically, we hypothesize that neighborhood structural disadvantage--as measured by levels of concentrated poverty, residential instability, and aspects of immigrant concentration--and diminished collective efficacy have consequences for the prevalence of early adolescent multiple sexual partnering. Findings from random effects multinomial logistic regression models of the number of sexual partners among a sample of youth, age 11 to 16, from the Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (N = 768) reveal evidence of neighborhood effects on adolescent higher-risk sexual activity. Collective efficacy is negatively associated with having two or more sexual partners versus one (but not zero versus one) sexual partner. The effect of collective efficacy is dependent upon age: The regulatory effect of collective efficacy increases for older adolescents.
authors.affiliation: Department of Sociology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210-1353, USA. browning.90@osu.edu
authors.forename: Christopher R
authors.initials: CR
authors.lastname: Browning
authors.forename: Lori A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Burrington
authors.forename: Tama
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Leventhal
authors.forename: Jeanne
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Brooks-Gunn
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000294:Adolescent Behavior; D000367:Age Factors; D002648:Child; D054242:Emigrants and Immigrants; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008297:Male; D011203:Poverty; D015995:Prevalence; D012111:Residence Characteristics; D012307:Risk Factors; D012309:Risk-Taking; D012725:Sexual Behavior / Q000523:psychology*; D012919:Social Behavior; D012923:Social Class; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D014505:Urban Population
references.citation: Child Dev. 1987 Jun;58(3):829-41
references.pmid: 3608653
references.citation: Fam Plann Perspect. 2000 May-Jun;32(3):111-7
references.pmid: 10894256
references.citation: Demography. 2004 Nov;41(4):697-720
references.pmid: 15622950
references.citation: Science. 1997 Aug 15;277(5328):918-24
references.pmid: 9252316
references.citation: J Health Soc Behav. 1998 Sep;39(3):237-53
references.pmid: 9785696
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2005 Feb;9(2):69-74
references.pmid: 15668099
references.citation: JAMA. 1997 Sep 10;278(10):823-32
references.pmid: 9293990
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2000 Mar;126(2):309-37
references.pmid: 10748645
references.citation: J Youth Adolesc. 1988 Apr;17(2):117-33
references.pmid: 24277579
references.citation: J Adolesc Health. 1996 Mar;18(3):182-91
references.pmid: 8777194