Attentional capture by visual singletons is mediated by top-down task set: new evidence from the N2pc component.
To investigate whether attentional capture by salient visual stimuli is mediated by current task sets, we measured the N2pc component as a marker of the spatial locus of visual attention during visual search. In each trial, a singleton stimulus that could either be a target (color task: red circle; shape task: green diamond) or a nontarget (blue circle or green square) was presented among uniform distractors (green circles). As predicted by the view that attentional capture is contingent on task set, the N2pc was strongly affected by task instructions. It was maximal for targets, attenuated but still reliably present for nontarget singletons defined in the target dimension (even when these were accompanied by an irrelevant-dimension singleton), and small or absent for equally salient irrelevant-dimension singletons. Results demonstrate that attentional capture is not a purely bottom-up phenomenon, but is strongly determined by top-down task set.
Kiss
Monika
M
School of Psychology, Birkbeck College, University of London, London, UK. m.kiss@bbk.ac.uk
Jolicoeur
Pierre
P
Dell'acqua
Roberto
R
Eimer
Martin
M
D000328:Adult; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D004569:Electroencephalography; D005071:Evoked Potentials / Q000502:physiology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D014796:Visual Perception / Q000502:physiology*
Neuropsychologia. 2007 Oct 1;45(13):3038-53
17659310
Nature. 1999 Aug 26;400(6747):867-9
10476964
Percept Psychophys. 1991 Aug;50(2):184-93
1945740
Neuroreport. 2006 Oct 23;17(15):1655-8
17001287
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Aug;20(4):799-806
8083635
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989 May;15(2):315-30
2525601
Psychol Res. 2006 Nov;70(6):414-24
16184394
Neuroreport. 2007 Jul 16;18(11):1163-6
17589319
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2004 Dec;30(6):1019-31
15584812
J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Apr;18(4):604-13
16768363
Psychophysiology. 1994 May;31(3):291-308
8008793
Biol Psychol. 2007 Jan;74(1):108-12
16899334
Psychophysiology. 2008 Mar;45(2):240-9
17971061
Psychophysiology. 2007 May;44(3):436-43
17371492
Percept Psychophys. 2005 Nov;67(8):1354-61
16555587
Percept Psychophys. 1994 May;55(5):485-96
8008550
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Oct;20(5):1000-14
7964526
Psychophysiology. 2005 May;42(3):328-42
15943687
Psychophysiology. 2006 Jul;43(4):394-400
16916436
Percept Psychophys. 2002 Jul;64(5):741-53
12201333
Neuroreport. 2007 Oct 8;18(15):1589-93
17885607
Can J Exp Psychol. 2006 Jun;60(2):101-11
17133886
Cogn Psychol. 1997 Jun;33(1):64-87
9212722
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Aug;19(8):1316-22
17651005
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Apr;20(2):317-29
8189195
J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Mar;9(2):238-53
23962014
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Apr;20(4):657-71
18052780
Psychophysiology. 2007 Mar;44(2):323-33
17343714
Psychon Bull Rev. 2007 Feb;14(1):126-32
17546742
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998 Jun;24(3):847-58
9627420
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1996 Sep;99(3):225-34
8862112
Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1989 Feb;72(2):184-7
2464490
Exp Brain Res. 2007 Aug;181(3):531-6
17602216
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Aug;32(4):973-85
16846292
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1992 Nov;18(4):1030-44
1431742
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Aug;20(8):1423-33
18303979
Can J Exp Psychol. 2005 Jun;59(2):124-31
16035345