Adaptation of velocity encoding in synaptically coupled neurons in the fly visual system.
Although many adaptation-induced effects on neuronal response properties have been described, it is often unknown at what processing stages in the nervous system they are generated. We focused on fly visual motion-sensitive neurons to identify changes in response characteristics during prolonged visual motion stimulation. By simultaneous recordings of synaptically coupled neurons, we were able to directly compare adaptation-induced effects at two consecutive processing stages in the fly visual motion pathway. This allowed us to narrow the potential sites of adaptation effects within the visual system and to relate them to the properties of signal transfer between neurons. Motion adaptation was accompanied by a response reduction, which was somewhat stronger in postsynaptic than in presynaptic cells. We found that the linear representation of motion velocity degrades during adaptation to a white-noise velocity-modulated stimulus. This effect is caused by an increasingly nonlinear velocity representation rather than by an increase of noise and is similarly strong in presynaptic and postsynaptic neurons. In accordance with this similarity, the dynamics and the reliability of interneuronal signal transfer remained nearly constant. Thus, adaptation is mainly based on processes located in the presynaptic neuron or in more peripheral processing stages. In contrast, changes of transfer properties at the analyzed synapse or in postsynaptic spike generation contribute little to changes in velocity coding during motion adaptation.
Kalb
Julia
J
Department of Neurobiology, Bielefeld University, D-33501 Bielefeld, Germany.
Egelhaaf
Martin
M
Kurtz
Rafael
R
D000054:Acceleration; D000200:Action Potentials / Q000502:physiology; D000222:Adaptation, Physiological / Q000502:physiology*; D000818:Animals; D004175:Diptera / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D008959:Models, Neurological; D009039:Motion Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D009474:Neurons / Q000502:physiology*; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D013569:Synapses / Q000502:physiology*; D013997:Time Factors; D014794:Visual Fields / Q000502:physiology; D014795:Visual Pathways / Q000166:cytology* / Q000502:physiology
Vision Res. 2003 May;43(11):1309-22
12726836
J Neurophysiol. 2000 Oct;84(4):1914-23
11024084
Neuroscience. 2003;119(4):1103-12
12831867
J Neurophysiol. 1998 Apr;79(4):1902-17
9535957
PLoS Biol. 2007 Feb;5(2):e19
17253902
Vision Res. 1999 Aug;39(16):2603-13
10492824
Vision Res. 2001 Jun;41(14):1851-65
11369048
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Dec;98(6):3309-20
17928564
Neuroscience. 2007 May 11;146(2):573-83
17367948
Neuron. 2006 May 4;50(3):453-64
16675399
J Neurophysiol. 1999 Dec;82(6):3327-38
10601464
Neuron. 2000 Nov;28(2):595-606
11144367
J Neurophysiol. 2007 Mar;97(3):2032-41
17215505
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Apr 26;102(17):6172-6
15833815
J Neurophysiol. 2003 Jun;89(6):3279-93
12649312
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2001 Aug;11(4):475-80
11502395
J Neurosci. 1997 Jun 15;17(12):4809-19
9169539
Neuron. 2000 Jun;26(3):695-702
10896164
J Neurosci. 2001 Sep 1;21(17):6957-66
11517283
J Neurophysiol. 2007 May;97(5):3155-64
17344377
J Comput Neurosci. 2001 Mar-Apr;10(2):213-21
11361260
J Neurosci. 2006 Jul 26;26(30):7898-906
16870735
Nature. 2001 Aug 23;412(6849):787-92
11518957
J Neurophysiol. 2005 Sep;94(3):1761-9
15917319
Trends Neurosci. 2002 Feb;25(2):96-102
11814562
J Neurophysiol. 2001 Feb;85(2):724-34
11160507
Nat Neurosci. 2004 Jun;7(6):628-34
15133514
J Neurophysiol. 1997 Jan;77(1):207-20
9120562
Science. 1997 May 9;276(5314):949-52
9139658
Vis Neurosci. 1997 Jul-Aug;14(4):741-9
9279002