title: Valuing insect pollination services with cost of replacement.
abstract: Value estimates of ecosystem goods and services are useful to justify the allocation of resources towards conservation, but inconclusive estimates risk unsustainable resource allocations. Here we present replacement costs as a more accurate value estimate of insect pollination as an ecosystem service, although this method could also be applied to other services. The importance of insect pollination to agriculture is unequivocal. However, whether this service is largely provided by wild pollinators (genuine ecosystem service) or managed pollinators (commercial service), and which of these requires immediate action amidst reports of pollinator decline, remains contested. If crop pollination is used to argue for biodiversity conservation, clear distinction should be made between values of managed- and wild pollination services. Current methods either under-estimate or over-estimate the pollination service value, and make use of criticised general insect and managed pollinator dependence factors. We apply the theoretical concept of ascribing a value to a service by calculating the cost to replace it, as a novel way of valuing wild and managed pollination services. Adjusted insect and managed pollinator dependence factors were used to estimate the cost of replacing insect- and managed pollination services for the Western Cape deciduous fruit industry of South Africa. Using pollen dusting and hand pollination as suitable replacements, we value pollination services significantly higher than current market prices for commercial pollination, although lower than traditional proportional estimates. The complexity associated with inclusive value estimation of pollination services required several defendable assumptions, but made estimates more inclusive than previous attempts. Consequently this study provides the basis for continued improvement in context specific pollination service value estimates.
authors.affiliation: Plant Protection Research Institute, Agricultural Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
authors.forename: Mike H
authors.initials: MH
authors.lastname: Allsopp
authors.forename: Willem J
authors.initials: WJ
authors.lastname: de Lange
authors.forename: Ruan
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Veldtman
mesh_terms: D000383:Agriculture / Q000191:economics; D000818:Animals; D001516:Bees / Q000502:physiology*; D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000191:economics* / Q000379:methods; D018556:Crops, Agricultural / Q000191:economics; D004463:Ecology; D017753:Ecosystem; D005638:Fruit / Q000191:economics; D007313:Insecta / Q000378:metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D008954:Models, Biological; D018803:Models, Economic; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D011058:Pollen; D054817:Pollination; D013019:South Africa
references.citation: Am J Bot. 2003 Jan;90(1):153-7
references.pmid: 21659091
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2007 Apr;10(4):299-314
references.pmid: 17355569
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Aug 8;418(6898):671-7
references.pmid: 12167873
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 7;274(1608):303-13
references.pmid: 17164193
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2007 Jun;5(6):e168
references.pmid: 17564497
references.citation: Ecol Appl. 2007 Sep;17(6):1841-9
references.pmid: 17913145
references.citation: Ann Bot. 2005 Mar;95(4):583-91
references.pmid: 15661749
references.citation: Ecol Appl. 2007 Sep;17(6):1832-40
references.pmid: 17913144
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Dec;20(12):651-2; author reply 652-3
references.pmid: 16701452
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Jul;20(7):367-73
references.pmid: 16701398
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 12;103(37):13890-5
references.pmid: 16940358
references.citation: Ecol Lett. 2007 Nov;10(11):1105-13
references.pmid: 17877737