Single-channel analysis of functional epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) stability at the apical membrane of A6 distal kidney cells.
Epithelial sodium channels (ENaC) play an essential role in maintaining total body fluid and electrolyte homeostasis. As such, abnormal expression of ENaC at the cell surface is linked to several important human diseases. Although the stability of ENaC subunits has been extensively studied by protein biochemical analysis, the half-life of the functional channel in the apical membrane remains controversial. Because the functional stability of the multisubunit channel may be more physiologically relevant than the stability of individual subunit proteins, we performed studies of functional ENaC channels using A6 epithelial cells, a Xenopus laevis distal nephron cell line. We recorded single-channel activity in over 400 cells with the translation blockers cycloheximide (CHX) or puromycin, as well as the intracellular protein trafficking inhibitors brefeldin A (BFA) or nocodazole. Our cell-attached, single-channel recordings allow us to quantify the channel density in the apical membrane, as well as to determine channel open probability (Po) from control (untreated) cells and from cells at different times of drug treatment. The data suggest that the half-life of ENaC channels is approximately 3.5 h following puromycin, BFA, and nocodazole treatment. Furthermore, these three drugs had no significant effect on the Po of ENaC for at least 6 h after exposure. A decrease in apical channel number and Po was observed following 2 h of CHX inhibition of protein synthesis, and the apparent channel half-life was closer to 1.5 h following CHX treatment. Treatment of cells with the translation inhibitors does not alter the expression of the protease furin, and therefore changes in protease activity cannot explain changes in ENaC Po. Confocal images show that BFA and nocodazole both disrupt most of the Golgi apparatus after 1-h exposure. In cells with the Golgi totally disrupted by overnight exposure to BFA, 20% of apical ENaC channels remained functional. This result suggests that ENaC is delivered to the apical membrane via a pathway that might bypass the Golgi vesicular trafficking pathway, or that there might be two pools of channels with markedly different half-lives in the apical membrane.
Yu
Ling
L
Center for Cell and Molecular Signaling, Department of Physiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Whitehead Biomedical Research Bldg. 615 Michael St., Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. Lyu@physio.emory.edu
Helms
My N
MN
Yue
Qiang
Q
Eaton
Douglas C
DC
D000818:Animals; D015153:Blotting, Western; D020126:Brefeldin A / Q000494:pharmacology; D002460:Cell Line; D003513:Cycloheximide / Q000494:pharmacology; D004594:Electrophysiology; D004847:Epithelial Cells / Q000166:cytology / Q000187:drug effects / Q000502:physiology*; D053503:Epithelial Sodium Channels / Q000378:metabolism / Q000502:physiology*; D045683:Furin / Q000378:metabolism; D006056:Golgi Apparatus / Q000187:drug effects / Q000378:metabolism; D007686:Kidney Tubules, Distal / Q000166:cytology*; D008564:Membrane Potentials / Q000187:drug effects; D015739:Nocodazole / Q000494:pharmacology; D021381:Protein Transport / Q000187:drug effects; D011691:Puromycin / Q000494:pharmacology; D014982:Xenopus laevis
D053503:Epithelial Sodium Channels; D020126:Brefeldin A; D011691:Puromycin; D003513:Cycloheximide; D045683:Furin; D015739:Nocodazole
J Biol Chem. 1997 Oct 10;272(41):25537-41
9325269
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2006 Apr;290(4):L710-L722
16284210
Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2005 Jun;288(6):L1099-109
15681398
J Biol Chem. 2002 Dec 6;277(49):47318-24
12372821
Cell. 1991 Nov 1;67(3):601-16
1682055
J Biol Chem. 2002 Mar 22;277(12):9772-9
11773057
J Biol Chem. 2008 Mar 7;283(10):6033-9
18174164
J Biol Chem. 2004 Jul 30;279(31):32071-8
15166222
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2003 Nov;285(5):F833-42
14532162
J Biol Chem. 2004 Apr 30;279(18):18111-4
15007080
J Cell Biol. 1987 May;104(5):1231-7
3032984
J Biol Chem. 2007 Mar 2;282(9):6153-60
17199078
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Dec 24;93(26):15370-5
8986818
Nature. 2007 Sep 20;449(7160):316-23
17882215
J Gen Physiol. 2002 May;119(5):427-42
11981022
J Biol Chem. 2000 Jun 2;275(22):16550-9
10747971
Physiol Rev. 1997 Apr;77(2):359-96
9114818
Am J Physiol. 1996 Jan;270(1 Pt 1):C138-47
8772439
J Biol Chem. 1991 Sep 25;266(27):17729-32
1917917
Am J Physiol. 1991 May;260(5 Pt 1):C1071-84
1852105
Nephrologie. 1996;17(7):395-400
8987044
J Biol Chem. 2000 Dec 22;275(51):39886-93
10978318
J Biol Chem. 2003 Sep 26;278(39):37073-82
12871941
Biochimie. 1988 Sep;70(9):1285-90
2852509
J Biol Chem. 2008 Mar 21;283(12):7455-63
18195015
Traffic. 2007 Sep;8(9):1246-64
17605762
J Biol Chem. 2004 Sep 3;279(36):37771-8
15215250
J Gen Physiol. 2005 Jan;125(1):81-101
15623897
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2007 Jul;293(1):F236-44
17429036
J Biol Chem. 1999 Jan 29;274(5):2743-9
9915805
Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2007 Nov;232(10):1258-65
17959838
Cell. 1990 Mar 9;60(5):821-36
2178778
Am J Physiol. 1992 Oct;263(4 Pt 1):C825-37
1329547
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Jun 6;92(12):5699-703
7777572
Cell. 1994 Nov 4;79(3):407-14
7954808
J Biol Chem. 2006 Jul 7;281(27):18901-7
16690613
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol. 2006 Jun;290(6):F1488-96
16449353
Nature. 1994 Feb 3;367(6462):463-7
8107805
Physiol Rev. 2002 Jul;82(3):735-67
12087134
J Biol Chem. 2007 Jul 13;282(28):20180-90
17522058
RNA. 2006 May;12(5):717-25
16540697
J Biol Chem. 2004 Nov 19;279(47):48491-4
15466477