Female-biased dispersal and gene flow in a behaviorally monogamous mammal, the large treeshrew (Tupaia tana).
BACKGROUND
Female-biased dispersal (FBD) is predicted to occur in monogamous species due to local resource competition among females, but evidence for this association in mammals is scarce. The predicted relationship between FBD and monogamy may also be too simplistic, given that many pair-living mammals exhibit substantial extra-pair paternity.


RESULTS
I examined whether dispersal and gene flow are female-biased in the large treeshrew (Tupaia tana) in Borneo, a behaviorally monogamous species with a genetic mating system characterized by high rates (50%) of extra-pair paternity. Genetic analyses provided evidence of FBD in this species. As predicted for FBD, I found lower mean values for the corrected assignment index for adult females than for males using seven microsatellite loci, indicating that female individuals were more likely to be immigrants. Adult female pairs were also less related than adult male pairs. Furthermore, comparison of Bayesian coalescent-based estimates of migration rates using maternally and bi-parentally inherited genetic markers suggested that gene flow is female-biased in T. tana. The effective number of migrants between populations estimated from mitochondrial DNA sequence was three times higher than the number estimated using autosomal microsatellites.


CONCLUSIONS
These results provide the first evidence of FBD in a behaviorally monogamous species without mating fidelity. I argue that competition among females for feeding territories creates a sexual asymmetry in the costs and benefits of dispersal in treeshrews.
Munshi-South
Jason
J
Behavior, Ecology, Evolution and Systematics Program, Department of Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, USA. Jason.Munshi-South@baruch.cuny.edu
D000483:Alleles; D025041:Animal Migration; D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D003163:Competitive Behavior; D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial / Q000378:metabolism; D005260:Female; D051456:Gene Flow; D014644:Genetic Variation; D008297:Male; D018895:Microsatellite Repeats; D008957:Models, Genetic; D009154:Mutation; D012726:Sexual Behavior, Animal; D014418:Tupaiidae / Q000235:genetics* / Q000502:physiology*
D004272:DNA, Mitochondrial
Evolution. 1989 Mar;43(2):258-275
28568555
Am Nat. 1999 Sep;154(3):282-292
10506544
Mol Ecol. 2001 Jan;10(1):41-52
11251786
Mol Ecol. 2001 Jun;10(6):1539-49
11412374
Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Jan 22;264(1378):127-32
9061966
Mol Ecol. 1995 Jun;4(3):347-54
7663752
Mol Ecol. 2000 Jun;9(6):743-51
10849290
Mol Ecol. 2002 Mar;11(3):289-303
11928704
Mol Ecol. 2006 Apr;15(4):939-49
16599958
Mol Ecol. 2002 Jun;11(6):1103-14
12030985
Mol Ecol. 2001 Jun;10(6):1527-37
11412373
Biol Lett. 2006 Jun 22;2(2):312-5
17148391
Mol Ecol. 2007 Jun;16(11):2247-59
17561888
Mol Ecol. 2001 Sep;10(9):2307-17
11555272
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000 Aug;75(3):405-35
11034017
Nat Genet. 2001 Sep;29(1):20-1
11528385
PLoS One. 2007 Oct 03;2(10):e973
17912352
Bioinformatics. 2003 Dec 12;19(18):2496-7
14668244
Genetics. 1996 Dec;144(4):1933-40
8978076
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Apr 10;98(8):4563-8
11287657
Mol Ecol. 2005 Jul;14(8):2511-23
15969731
Evolution. 2004 Apr;58(4):886-94
15154563
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2005 May;80(2):205-25
15921049
Mol Ecol. 2005 Apr;14(4):1197-205
15773946
Genetics. 2000 Aug;155(4):2011-4
10924493
Trends Ecol Evol. 2004 Dec;19(12):654-60
16701328
Science. 1977 Jul 15;197(4300):215-23
327542
Mol Ecol. 2002 Nov;11(11):2195-212
12406233
Curr Biol. 2004 Mar 23;14(6):510-3
15043817
Bioinformatics. 2006 Feb 1;22(3):341-5
16317072
Genetics. 1999 Aug;152(4):1753-66
10430599
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Feb 22;273(1585):479-84
16615216
Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1989 May 22;236(1285):339-72
2567517
Mol Ecol. 2004 Dec;13(12):3621-32
15548278
J Evol Biol. 2004 Nov;17(6):1195-203
15525404
Mol Ecol. 1999 Jun;8(6):1063-7
10434424
Mol Ecol. 2007 Apr;16(8):1559-78
17402974
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Jul 29;360(1459):1457-67
16048788
Mol Ecol. 2004 Apr;13(4):837-51
15012759
Heredity (Edinb). 2002 Mar;88(3):161-5
11920116