title: Traits, states, and attentional gates: temperament and threat relevance as predictors of attentional bias to social threat.
abstract: This study investigated the influence of situational and dispositional factors on attentional biases toward social threat, and the impact of these attentional biases on distress in a sample of adolescents. The results suggest greater biases for personally relevant threat cues, as individuals reporting high social stress were vigilant to subliminal social threat cues, but not physical threat cues, and those reporting low social stress showed no attentional biases. Individual differences in fearful temperament and attentional control interacted to influence attentional biases, with fearful temperament predicting biases to supraliminal social threat only for individuals with poor attentional control. Multivariate analyses exploring relations between attentional biases for social threat and symptoms of anxiety and depression revealed that attentional biases alone were rarely related to symptoms. However, biases did interact with social stress, fearful temperament, and attentional control to predict distress. The results are discussed in terms of automatic and effortful cognitive mechanisms underlying threat cue processing.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA. egh42@cornell.edu
authors.forename: Erik G
authors.initials: EG
authors.lastname: Helzer
authors.forename: Jennifer K
authors.initials: JK
authors.lastname: Connor-Smith
authors.forename: Marjorie A
authors.initials: MA
authors.lastname: Reed
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000374:Aggression; D001007:Anxiety / Q000523:psychology*; D001288:Attention; D002648:Child; D003463:Cues; D003657:Decision Making; D005239:Fear; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007389:Internal-External Control; D007802:Language; D008297:Male; D020412:Multifactorial Inheritance; D044469:Racial Groups; D012919:Social Behavior; D013315:Stress, Psychological; D013694:Temperament
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 1995 Feb;104(1):241-5
references.pmid: 7897048
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 2002 Jun;40(6):677-87
references.pmid: 12051486
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 2002 Feb;111(1):107-23
references.pmid: 11866165
references.citation: J Anxiety Disord. 2004;18(5):609-27
references.pmid: 15275942
references.citation: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2004 Mar;33(1):21-31
references.pmid: 15028538
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1993 Sep;114(2):376-90
references.pmid: 8416037
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1994 Jan;101(1):34-52
references.pmid: 8121959
references.citation: J Pediatr Psychol. 2006 Mar;31(2):209-20
references.pmid: 15843503
references.citation: Behav Modif. 2000 Jan;24(1):69-93
references.pmid: 10641368
references.citation: Behav Res Ther. 1992 Mar;30(2):151-61
references.pmid: 1567344
references.citation: J Pers. 1991 Sep;59(3):355-86
references.pmid: 1960637
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 2004 Dec;89(4):320-37
references.pmid: 15560877
references.citation: J Abnorm Psychol. 2002 May;111(2):225-36
references.pmid: 12003445
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 1994;45:25-50
references.pmid: 8135504
references.citation: Child Dev. 1996 Jun;67(3):1173-85
references.pmid: 8706516
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol A. 1988 Nov;40(4):653-70
references.pmid: 3212208
references.citation: J Consult Clin Psychol. 1987 Aug;55(4):534-541
references.pmid: 3624609
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2004 Aug;15(8):521-6
references.pmid: 15270996
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2007 Jan;133(1):1-24
references.pmid: 17201568