title: Autumn leaves seen through herbivore eyes.
abstract: Why leaves of some trees turn red in autumn has puzzled biologists for decades, as just before leaf fall the pigments causing red coloration are newly synthesized. One idea to explain this apparently untimely investment is that red colour signals the tree's quality to herbivorous insects, particularly aphids. However, it is unclear whether red leaves are indeed less attractive to aphids than green leaves. Because aphids lack a red photoreceptor, it was conjectured that red leaves could even be indiscernable from green ones for these insects. Here we show, however, that the colour of autumnal tree leaves that appear red to humans are on average much less attractive to aphids than green leaves, whereas yellow leaves are much more attractive. We conclude that, while active avoidance of red leaves by aphids is unlikely, red coloration in autumn could still be a signal of the tree's quality, or alternatively serve to mask the over-attractive yellow that is unveiled when the green chlorophyll is recovered from senescing leaves. Our study shows that in sensory ecology, receiver physiology alone is not sufficient to reveal the whole picture. Instead, the combined analysis of behaviour and a large set of natural stimuli unexpectedly shows that animals lacking a red photoreceptor may be able to differentiate between red and green leaves.
authors.affiliation: Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Ascot, Berkshire SL5 7PY, UK. t.doering@imperial.ac.uk
authors.forename: Thomas F
authors.initials: TF
authors.lastname: Döring
authors.forename: Marco
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Archetti
authors.forename: Jim
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Hardie
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001042:Aphids / Q000502:physiology*; D003116:Color; D055253:Color Vision; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D018515:Plant Leaves / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000502:physiology; D014197:Trees / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000502:physiology
references.citation: Science. 1983 Jul 8;221(4606):190-2
references.pmid: 17769217
references.citation: New Phytol. 2008;179(1):9-13
references.pmid: 18557874
references.citation: J Theor Biol. 2000 Aug 21;205(4):625-30
references.pmid: 10931756
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A. 1992 Jan;170(1):23-40
references.pmid: 1573568
references.citation: Cogn Psychol. 2005 Jun;50(4):378-411
references.pmid: 15893525
references.citation: IEEE Trans Image Process. 1997;6(7):901-32
references.pmid: 18282983
references.citation: PLoS Biol. 2007 Aug;5(8):e187
references.pmid: 17696643
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2007 Apr 22;3(2):150-1
references.pmid: 17264053
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jul 22;268(1475):1489-93
references.pmid: 11454293
references.citation: J Insect Physiol. 2005 Nov;51(11):1255-60
references.pmid: 16162354
references.citation: Annu Rev Entomol. 2001;46:471-510
references.pmid: 11112177
references.citation: Vision Res. 1993 May;33(8):1011-7
references.pmid: 8506642