title: The developmental pattern of stimulus and response interference in a color-object Stroop task: an ERP study.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Several studies have shown that Stroop interference is stronger in children than in adults. However, in a standard Stroop paradigm, stimulus interference and response interference are confounded. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether interference at the stimulus level and the response level are subject to distinct maturational patterns across childhood. Three groups of children (6-7 year-olds, 8-9 year-olds, and 10-12 year-olds) and a group of adults performed a manual Color-Object Stroop designed to disentangle stimulus interference and response interference. This was accomplished by comparing three trial types. In congruent (C) trials there was no interference. In stimulus incongruent (SI) trials there was only stimulus interference. In response incongruent (RI) trials there was stimulus interference and response interference. Stimulus interference and response interference were measured by a comparison of SI with C, and RI with SI trials, respectively. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were measured to study the temporal dynamics of these processes of interference.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There was no behavioral evidence for stimulus interference in any of the groups, but in 6-7 year-old children ERPs in the SI condition in comparison with the C condition showed an occipital P1-reduction (80-140 ms) and a widely distributed amplitude enhancement of a negative component followed by an amplitude reduction of a positive component (400-560 ms). For response interference, all groups showed a comparable reaction time (RT) delay, but children made more errors than adults. ERPs in the RI condition in comparison with the SI condition showed an amplitude reduction of a positive component over lateral parietal (-occipital) sites in 10-12 year-olds and adults (300-540 ms), and a widely distributed amplitude enhancement of a positive component in all age groups (680-960 ms). The size of the enhancement correlated positively with the RT response interference effect.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Although processes of stimulus interference control as measured with the color-object Stroop task seem to reach mature levels relatively early in childhood (6-7 years), development of response interference control appears to continue into late adolescence as 10-12 year-olds were still more susceptible to errors of response interference than adults.
authors.affiliation: Department of Cognitive Neuroscience, Section of Biological Developmental Psychology, Maastricht University, Faculty of Psychology, 6200 MD Maastricht, the Netherlands. E.Jongen@psychology.unimaas.nl
authors.forename: Ellen M M
authors.initials: EM
authors.lastname: Jongen
authors.forename: Lisa M
authors.initials: LM
authors.lastname: Jonkman
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D002648:Child; D003118:Color Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D005074:Evoked Potentials, Visual / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods*; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology*; D011930:Reaction Time / Q000502:physiology*
references.citation: Neuroimage. 1999 Jun;9(6 Pt 1):587-97
references.pmid: 10334902
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1999 Nov;125(6):777-99
references.pmid: 10589302
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 1986 Nov;23(6):695-703
references.pmid: 3823345
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1990 Jul;97(3):332-61
references.pmid: 2200075
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 1997 Jun;65(3):315-41
references.pmid: 9178963
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2001 Jul 15;21(14):5262-71
references.pmid: 11438601
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 May;18(5):781-92
references.pmid: 16768377
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2004 Sep 22;24(38):8223-31
references.pmid: 15385605
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2003 Apr;31(3):353-9
references.pmid: 12795477
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2007 Nov 5;45(14):3190-202
references.pmid: 17675108
references.citation: BMC Neurosci. 2004 Oct 22;5:39
references.pmid: 15500693
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2001 May;13(5):786-93
references.pmid: 11304075
references.citation: Can J Exp Psychol. 2005 Jun;59(2):132-8
references.pmid: 16035346
references.citation: J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2003 May;44(4):561-75
references.pmid: 12751848
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(11):2149-57
references.pmid: 16303150
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2005 Nov;167(1):38-48
references.pmid: 16082533
references.citation: Neuron. 2002 Jan 17;33(2):301-11
references.pmid: 11804576
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Dec;12(3):467-73
references.pmid: 11689307
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2002 Nov;17(3):1207-16
references.pmid: 12414261
references.citation: Brain Res. 2006 Jun 30;1097(1):181-93
references.pmid: 16729977
references.citation: Behav Brain Funct. 2007 Apr 30;3:23
references.pmid: 17470279
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2000 Mar;126(2):220-46
references.pmid: 10748641
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2002;40(8):1254-67
references.pmid: 11931928
references.citation: Cogn Dev. 2005 Jun;20(2):256-278
references.pmid: 18079980
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1991 Mar;109(2):163-203
references.pmid: 2034749
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(11):2037-78
references.pmid: 16580701
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2002 May;16(1):61-75
references.pmid: 11969318
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 1999 Jul 16;8(2):157-64
references.pmid: 10407204
references.citation: Brain Res. 2006 Feb 9;1072(1):186-93
references.pmid: 16443198
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 May 25;101(21):8174-9
references.pmid: 15148381
references.citation: Science. 2000 Jun 9;288(5472):1835-8
references.pmid: 10846167
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Jun;1021:296-309
references.pmid: 15251900
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(5):701-11
references.pmid: 10689046
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2003 Apr;65(3):359-66
references.pmid: 12785066
references.citation: Perception. 2003;32(6):667-80
references.pmid: 12892428
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 1997 Nov;9(6):835-47
references.pmid: 23964603
references.citation: Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(8):1122-35
references.pmid: 12667546
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2000;12 Suppl 2:118-29
references.pmid: 11506652
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1970 Feb;83(2):299-303
references.pmid: 5480902
references.citation: Brain Res. 2008 Jan 23;1190:143-58
references.pmid: 18076868
references.citation: Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Aug;13(4):674-81
references.pmid: 17201369
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Feb;20(2):215-25
references.pmid: 18275330
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 2005 Jan;90(1):21-47
references.pmid: 15596075
references.citation: Brain Res. 2000 Aug 4;873(1):102-11
references.pmid: 10915815
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2004 Jun;1021:77-85
references.pmid: 15251877
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2001 Jul 1;13(5):698-710
references.pmid: 11506665
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2000 Mar;37(2):179-89
references.pmid: 10731768
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jul 6;96(14):8301-6
references.pmid: 10393989
references.citation: Neuropsychology. 2007 Mar;21(2):251-62
references.pmid: 17402825
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Jul 18;97(15):8728-33
references.pmid: 10900023
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 1989 Dec;48(3):353-78
references.pmid: 2584921
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 2006 Apr;16(4):553-60
references.pmid: 16033925
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2003 Mar;6(3):309-15
references.pmid: 12548289
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2004 Sep;41(5):739-48
references.pmid: 15318880
references.citation: Brain Cogn. 2002 Aug;49(3):277-96
references.pmid: 12139955
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Feb;18(3):278-87
references.pmid: 14741314
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2006 Oct;18(10):1631-43
references.pmid: 17014368
references.citation: Schizophr Bull. 2001;27(3):443-55
references.pmid: 11596846
references.citation: J Genet Psychol. 1967 Sep;111(1st Half):9-12
references.pmid: 5584089
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2005 Sep;27(3):497-504
references.pmid: 15964208
references.citation: Nature. 1999 Nov 11;402(6758):179-81
references.pmid: 10647008
references.citation: Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Feb;18(3):288-300
references.pmid: 14741315
references.citation: Neuron. 2006 May 18;50(4):643-53
references.pmid: 16701213
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Nov;12(6):988-1000
references.pmid: 11177419
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Aug;19(8):1338-53
references.pmid: 17651007
references.citation: Science. 2004 Feb 13;303(5660):1023-6
references.pmid: 14963333
references.citation: Clin Neurophysiol. 1999 Aug;110(8):1410-26
references.pmid: 10454277
references.citation: Neuroimage. 2002 Nov;17(3):1562-71
references.pmid: 12414294
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2006 Nov;43(6):564-8
references.pmid: 17076812
references.citation: Can J Psychol. 1984 Sep;38(3):421-39
references.pmid: 6488096
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2000 Jan;12(1):1-47
references.pmid: 10769304
references.citation: Dev Psychol. 2002 May;38(3):352-62
references.pmid: 12005379
references.citation: Cognition. 1994 Nov;53(2):129-53
references.pmid: 7805351
references.citation: Dev Neuropsychol. 2004;26(3):753-74
references.pmid: 15525568
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 2007 Nov;44(6):936-48
references.pmid: 17666028
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Feb 15;97(4):1944-8
references.pmid: 10677559