Restoration of elbow flexion by transfer of the phrenic nerve to musculocutaneous nerve after brachial plexus injuries.
Traumatic brachial plexus injuries are a devastating injury that results in partial or total denervation of the muscles of the upper extremity. Treatment options that include neurolysis, nerve grafting, or neurotization (nerve transfer) has become an important procedure in the restoration of function in patients with irreparable preganglionic lesions. Restoration of elbow flexion is the primary goal in treating patients with severe brachial plexus injuries. Nerve transfers are used when spinal roots are avulsed, and proximal stumps are not available. In the present study, we analyze the results obtained in 20 patients treated with phrenic-musculocutaneous nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion after brachial plexus injuries. A consecutive series of 25 adult patients (21 men and 4 women) with a brachial plexus traction/crush lesion were treated with phrenic-musculocutaneous nerve transfer, but only 20 patients (18 men and 2 women) were followed and evaluated for at least 2 years postoperatively. All patients had been referred from other institutions. At the initial evaluation, eight patients received a diagnosis of C5-6 brachial plexus nerve injury, and in the other 12 patients, a complete brachial plexus injury was identified. Reconstruction was undertaken if no clinical or electrical evidence of biceps muscle function was seen by 3 months post injury. Functional elbow flexion was obtained in the majority of cases by phrenic-musculocutaneous nerve transfer (14/20, 70%). At the final follow-up evaluation, elbow flexion strength was a Medical Research Council Grade 5 in two patients, Grade 4 in four patients, Grade 3 in eight patients, and Grade 2 or less in six patients. Transfer involving the phrenic nerve to restore elbow flexion seems to be an appropriate approach for the treatment of brachial plexus root avulsion. Traumatic brachial plexus injury is a devastating injury that result in partial or total denervation of the muscles of the upper extremity. Treatment options include neurolysis, nerve grafting, or neurotization (nerve transfer). Neurotization is the transfer of a functional but less important nerve to a denervated more important nerve. It has become an important procedure in the restoration of function in patients with irreparable preganglionic lesions. Restoration of elbow flexion is the primary goal in treating patients with severe brachial plexus injuries. Nerve transfers are used when spinal roots are avulsed, and proximal stumps are not available. Newer extraplexal sources include the ipsilateral phrenic nerve as reported by Gu et al. (Chin Med J 103:267-270, 1990) and contralateral C7 as reported by Gu et al. (J Hand Surg [Br] 17(B):518-521, 1992) and Songcharoen et al. (J Hand Surg [Am] 26(A):1058-1064, 2001). These nerve transfers have been introduced to expand on the limited donors. The phrenic nerve and its anatomic position directly within the surgical field makes it a tempting source for nerve transfer. Although not always, in cases of complete brachial plexus avulsion, the phrenic nerve is functioning as a result of its C3 and C4 major contributions. In the present study, we analyze the results obtained in 20 patients treated with phrenic-musculocutaneous nerve transfer to restore elbow flexion after brachial plexus injuries.
Monreal
Ricardo
R
Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Manuel Fajardo Teaching Hospital, Zapata y Calle D, Vedado, 10400, Havana, Cuba. rjmg@infomed.sld.cu
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988 Dec;(237):75-86
3191643
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1989 Oct;69(10):563-5, 38
2620264
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002 Jul;110(1):104-9; discussion 110-1
12087238
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988 Dec;(237):67-74
3191642
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 1993;95 Suppl:S65-72
8467599
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999 Jan;81(1):20-8
9973050
Ann Chir Main Memb Super. 1990;9(5):341-50
1705130
Surg Neurol. 1990 Jan;33(1):7-11
2154041
Chin Med J (Engl). 1990 Apr;103(4):267-70
2118036
J Hand Surg Am. 2005 Sep;30(5):978-85
16182054
Int Orthop. 2005 Dec;29(6):351-4
16200420
Hand Clin. 1995 Nov;11(4):633-45
8567745
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988 Dec;(237):43-56
3056647
J Hand Surg Am. 1990 Jan;15(1):30-6
2299164
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995 Aug;96(2):494-5
7624435
J Hand Surg Am. 1992 Sep;17(5):815-21
1401788
J Hand Surg Am. 1996 May;21(3):387-90
8724466
Chin J Traumatol. 2002 Oct;5(5):263-6
12241634
Microsurgery. 1983;4(2):95-104
6669011
Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995 Jul;96(1):122-8
7604091
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000 Nov;106(6):1348-57; quiz 1358; discussion 1359
11083569
J Hand Surg Am. 2001 Nov;26(6):1058-64
11721251
J Hand Surg Am. 1987 Nov;12(6):1114-8
3320178
J Hand Surg Br. 1992 Oct;17(5):518-21
1479244
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 May;(314):104-11
7634622
J Neurosurg. 1997 Dec;87(6):881-6
9384399