Cultures of death and politics of corpse supply: anatomy in Vienna, 1848-1914.
Nineteenth-century Vienna is well known to medical historians as a leading center of medical research and education, offering easy access to patients and corpses to students from all over the world. The author seeks to explain how this enviable supply of cadavers was achieved, why it provoked so little opposition at a time when Britain and the United States saw widespread protests against dissection, and how it was threatened from mid-century onward. To understand permissive Viennese attitudes, we need to place them in a longue durée history of death and dissection and to pay close attention to the city's political geography as it was transformed into a major imperial capital. The tolerant stance of the Roman Catholic Church, strong links to Southern Europe, and the weak position of individuals in the absolutist state all contributed to an idiosyncratic anatomical culture. But as the fame of the Vienna medical school peaked in the later 1800s, the increased demand created by rising numbers of students combined with intensified interdisciplinary competition to produce a shortfall that professors found increasingly difficult to meet. Around 1900, new religious groups and mass political parties challenged long-standing anatomical practice by refusing to supply cadavers and making dissection into an instrument of political struggle. This study of the material preconditions for anatomy at one of Europe's most influential medical schools provides a contrast to the dominant Anglo-American histories of death and dissection.
Buklijas
Tatjana
T
Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge CB2 3RH , UK. tb236@cam.ac.uk
D000715:Anatomy / Q000266:history*; D001293:Attitude to Death; D001317:Austria; D002102:Cadaver; D002410:Catholicism / Q000266:history*; D004210:Dissection / Q000266:history*; D004501:Education, Medical / Q000266:history*; D005655:Funeral Rites / Q000266:history*; D049672:History, 19th Century; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006801:Humans; D011057:Politics; D012068:Religion and Medicine
Isis. 2004 Sep;95(3):359-93
15747771
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2004 Dec 15;116(23):792-803
15683061
Isis. 2006 Sep;97(3):395-419
17059106
Med Hist. 2007 Jul;51(3):279-308
17603655
J Biocommun. 1988 Spring;15(2):2-12
3047110
Trans Stud Coll Physicians Phila. 2001 Dec;23:31-6
12087846
J Hist Med Allied Sci. 1995 Jan;50(1):111-32
7876528
Sudhoffs Arch. 1992;76(2):203-13
1292154
J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2005 Oct;60(4):478-98
16144959
Renaiss Q. 1994 Spring;47(1):1-33
11639270
Med Ges Gesch Beih. 2001;16:1-309
11763871
Bull Hist Med. 1978 Summer;52(2):183-99
361111
Rev Am Hist. 2002 Dec;30(4):571-76
12553337
Endeavour. 2004 Mar;28(1):39-44
15036928
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2004 Oct;154(19-20):443-53
15560466
Trans Stud Coll Physicians Phila. 1983 Dec;5(4):377-84
6362132
Bull Hist Med. 1972 Mar-Apr;46(2):99-130
4564766
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 1998 Feb 27;110(4-5):193-201
9544483
Med Hist. 2004 Jan;48(1):69-94
14968646
Osiris. 2003;18:116-34
12964570