title: Charge compensation for NADPH oxidase activity in microglia in rat brain slices does not involve a proton current.
abstract: The membrane properties of isolated cultured microglia have been extensively studied but it is important to understand their properties in situ, where they protect the brain against infection, but also contribute to neurodegenerative diseases. Microglia and macrophages attack bacteria by generating reactive oxygen species, a process which involves NADPH oxidase pumping electrons out across the cell membrane. The resulting inward current evokes a depolarization, which would inhibit the activity of the NADPH oxidase if there were no charge-compensating current which moves positive charge out across the membrane. The mechanism of this charge compensation is controversial. In neutrophils and in cultured microglia a depolarization-activated H(+) conductance has been proposed to provide charge compensation, and also to remove protons generated intracellularly by the NADPH oxidase. Alternatively, a depolarization-activated K(+) conductance has been proposed to mediate charge compensation. Here we show that in microglia, either in the resting state or when activated by the bacterial coat component lipopolysaccharide, both in acute and in cultured hippocampal slices, no significant H(+) current is detectable. This implies that the membrane properties of microglia in their normal cellular environment differ from those of cultured microglia (similarly, microglia generated a current in response to ATP but, unlike in culture, not to glutamate or GABA). Furthermore, the K(+) current (Kv1.3) that is activated by lipopolysaccharide is inactivated by depolarization, making it unsuitable for mediating charge compensation on a long time scale at positive voltages. Instead, charge compensation may be mediated by a previously undescribed non-selective cation current.
authors.affiliation: Department of Physiology, University College London, London, UK.
authors.forename: Anna
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: De Simoni
authors.forename: Nicola J
authors.initials: NJ
authors.lastname: Allen
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Attwell
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D048430:Cell Shape; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D003022:Clotrimazole / Q000378:metabolism; D005439:Flufenamic Acid / Q000378:metabolism; D006624:Hippocampus / Q000166:cytology; D051664:Kv1.3 Potassium Channel / Q000378:metabolism; D007811:Lanthanum / Q000378:metabolism; D008070:Lipopolysaccharides / Q000494:pharmacology; D008564:Membrane Potentials / Q000502:physiology; D017628:Microglia / Q000166:cytology / Q000187:drug effects / Q000201:enzymology*; D019255:NADPH Oxidases / Q000378:metabolism*; D018377:Neurotransmitter Agents / Q000378:metabolism; D018408:Patch-Clamp Techniques; D011522:Protons; D051381:Rats; D017207:Rats, Sprague-Dawley; D017382:Reactive Oxygen Species / Q000378:metabolism; D050053:TRPM Cation Channels / Q000378:metabolism
chemical_list: D051664:Kv1.3 Potassium Channel; D008070:Lipopolysaccharides; D018377:Neurotransmitter Agents; D011522:Protons; D017382:Reactive Oxygen Species; D050053:TRPM Cation Channels; D005439:Flufenamic Acid; D007811:Lanthanum; D019255:NADPH Oxidases; D003022:Clotrimazole
references.citation: Nature. 2002 Mar 21;416(6878):291-7
references.pmid: 11907569
references.citation: Prog Neurobiol. 2001 Jun;64(3):277-305
references.pmid: 11240310
references.citation: J Physiol. 2005 Sep 15;567(Pt 3):869-90
references.pmid: 16020460
references.citation: Mol Cell Neurosci. 2004 Feb;25(2):312-22
references.pmid: 15019947
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Dec 29;360(1464):2293-300
references.pmid: 16321799
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007 Jan;8(1):57-69
references.pmid: 17180163
references.citation: Nature. 2004 Feb 26;427(6977):853-8
references.pmid: 14985765
references.citation: Annu Rev Immunol. 2005;23:197-223
references.pmid: 15771570
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1993 Oct;13(10):4412-21
references.pmid: 8410196
references.citation: Neuropharmacology. 2004 Sep;47(3):450-60
references.pmid: 15275834
references.citation: Nature. 2003 Apr 3;422(6931):531-4
references.pmid: 12673252
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Jul 13;101(28):10482-7
references.pmid: 15240890
references.citation: J Physiol. 2001 Sep 15;535(Pt 3):783-94
references.pmid: 11559775
references.citation: J Neurocytol. 1987 Apr;16(2):249-60
references.pmid: 3625239
references.citation: Sci STKE. 2004 May 11;2004(233):pe21
references.pmid: 15150421
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2005 Aug 3;25(31):7139-49
references.pmid: 16079396
references.citation: Pflugers Arch. 1995 Aug;430(4):526-33
references.pmid: 7491279
references.citation: Glia. 1996 Jul;17(3):225-36
references.pmid: 8840164
references.citation: J Gen Physiol. 1988 Jan;91(1):49-72
references.pmid: 3125305
references.citation: Biochem J. 1994 Jan 1;297 ( Pt 1):217-23
references.pmid: 8280102
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2003 Jun;17(11):2267-76
references.pmid: 12814360
references.citation: J Neurochem. 2007 Jan;100(2):503-19
references.pmid: 17241161
references.citation: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2001 Apr;280(4):C796-806
references.pmid: 11245596
references.citation: Glia. 1996 Dec;18(4):319-31
references.pmid: 8972800
references.citation: Biophys J. 1991 Nov;60(5):1243-53
references.pmid: 1722118
references.citation: Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2004 Jan;286(1):C129-37
references.pmid: 14512294
references.citation: J Neurosci Res. 1995 Nov 1;42(4):439-51
references.pmid: 8568930
references.citation: Neuroscience. 1997 Jun;78(4):1217-28
references.pmid: 9174088
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005 Dec 29;360(1464):2315-25
references.pmid: 16321802
references.citation: J Neurosci Methods. 1991 Apr;37(2):173-82
references.pmid: 1715499
references.citation: Nat Protoc. 2006;1(3):1439-45
references.pmid: 17406432
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2000 Jun;12(6):2049-58
references.pmid: 10886344
references.citation: J Neurosci Res. 1992 Oct;33(2):218-30
references.pmid: 1333539
references.citation: J Immunol. 2003 Feb 1;170(3):1167-73
references.pmid: 12538672
references.citation: Hippocampus. 1998;8(5):458-74
references.pmid: 9825958
references.citation: Eur J Neurosci. 2003 Nov;18(10):2893-8
references.pmid: 14656339
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1998 Sep 15;18(18):7127-37
references.pmid: 9736636
references.citation: Mol Cell Neurosci. 2005 May;29(1):128-38
references.pmid: 15866053
references.citation: J Physiol. 2003 Jul 15;550(Pt 2):447-58
references.pmid: 12754316
references.citation: Neurosci Lett. 1992 Dec 7;147(2):171-4
references.pmid: 1491802
references.citation: Glia. 2001 Mar 1;33(3):256-66
references.pmid: 11241743
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2000 Jan 1;20(1):251-8
references.pmid: 10627602
references.citation: J Gen Physiol. 2006 Jun;127(6):659-72
references.pmid: 16702353
references.citation: Neuropharmacology. 2006 Jan;50(1):89-97
references.pmid: 16260005
references.citation: J Physiol. 2002 Nov 15;545(1):93-105
references.pmid: 12433952
references.citation: Biophys J. 1993 Oct;65(4):1590-8
references.pmid: 7506066
references.citation: Trends Pharmacol Sci. 2004 Dec;25(12):633-9
references.pmid: 15530641
references.citation: Neuroscience. 1999;92(4):1465-74
references.pmid: 10426500
references.citation: Mol Pharmacol. 1994 Jun;45(6):1227-34
references.pmid: 7517498
references.citation: J Neurosci Res. 1996 Nov 01;46(3):294-304
references.pmid: 8933368
references.citation: Neuroscience. 2005;135(4):1155-66
references.pmid: 16165295