title: Overview of contemporary penile rehabilitation therapies.
abstract: Introduction. Post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction affects a considerable number of men and is a significant quality of life issue. There has been a substantial amount of research on the treatment of post-prostatectomy ED, and now there is a rising interest in the concept of penile rehabilitation. The goal of penile rehabilitation is to moderate the destructive processes that occur after prostatectomy in order to preserve erectile function, either through spontaneous or assisted means. Methods. We reviewed published data and experiences of post-prostatectomy penile rehabilitation using regimented interventions of phosphodiesterase inhibitors, vacuum erectile device, and intracavernosal agents, and we present and analyze the research conducted. Results. These studies show improved objective and subjective clinical outcomes in regards to physical parameters, sexual satisfaction, and rates of spontaneous erections. Conclusion. These studies are often limited by small size, study period, and study design. There continues to be a need for large, randomized, placebo controlled trials with adequate followup to fully evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of the various proposed penile rehabilitation regiments before a clear standard can be established.
authors.affiliation: Division of Urology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, 6431 Fannin Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Hinh
authors.forename: Run
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Wang
references.citation: J Urol. 2007 Aug;178(2):613-6
references.pmid: 17570410
references.citation: J Urol. 2007 Aug;178(2):602-7
references.pmid: 17570431
references.citation: Int J Impot Res. 2006 Sep-Oct;18(5):446-51
references.pmid: 16482200
references.citation: Arch Intern Med. 2002 Jun 24;162(12):1349-60
references.pmid: 12076233
references.citation: J Urol. 2003 Mar;169(3):1175-9
references.pmid: 12576876
references.citation: J Urol. 2004 Feb;171(2 Pt 1):771-4
references.pmid: 14713808
references.citation: BJU Int. 2007 Oct;100(4):858-62
references.pmid: 17822466
references.citation: J Urol. 1999 Jun;161(6):1914-5
references.pmid: 10332471
references.citation: Int J Impot Res. 2006 Jan-Feb;18(1):77-81
references.pmid: 16107868
references.citation: J Sex Med. 2008 Feb;5(2):476-84
references.pmid: 18086170
references.citation: J Sex Med. 2007 Jul;4(4 Pt 2):1085-97
references.pmid: 17466058
references.citation: BJU Int. 2008 May;101(10):1279-83
references.pmid: 18284406
references.citation: J Sex Med. 2005 Jul;2(4):532-40; discussion 540-2
references.pmid: 16422848
references.citation: J Urol. 2007 Aug;178(2):597-601
references.pmid: 17570435
references.citation: Asian J Androl. 2008 Jan;10(1):61-74
references.pmid: 18087645
references.citation: J Urol. 2003 Apr;169(4):1462-4
references.pmid: 12629384
references.citation: Int J Impot Res. 1998 Jun;10(2):113-20
references.pmid: 9647948