title: Time travel through language: temporal shifts rapidly decrease information accessibility during reading.
abstract: The present study dissociated the immediate neural costs from the subsequent neural consequences of integrating time shifts into our mental representations of events. Event-related potentials were recorded as participants read scenarios that included words referring to short temporal shifts (e.g., after one second), moderate temporal shifts (e.g., after one hour), or long temporal shifts (e.g., after one year). These words were followed by repeated noun-phrase anaphors, which are preferred as referents for information no longer in attentional focus. The N400 was measured as an index of online conceptual integration. As the discourse unfolded, the N400 was larger for long- (e.g.,year) than for short- (e.g., second) shift words. For the anaphor, the N400 was modulated in the opposite direction. Thus, the introduction of a temporal discontinuity leads to immediate neural integration costs, as well as to decreased accessibility of earlier information.
authors.affiliation: Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, USA. tali.ditman@tufts.edu
authors.forename: Tali
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Ditman
authors.forename: Pillip J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Holcomb
authors.forename: Gina R
authors.initials: GR
authors.lastname: Kuperberg
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D001288:Attention / Q000502:physiology*; D001931:Brain Mapping; D002540:Cerebral Cortex / Q000502:physiology; D032882:Comprehension / Q000502:physiology*; D004292:Dominance, Cerebral / Q000502:physiology; D004569:Electroencephalography; D005071:Evoked Potentials / Q000502:physiology*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D011932:Reading; D012660:Semantics; D012815:Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; D013998:Time Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D055815:Young Adult
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 1995 May;23(3):313-23
references.pmid: 7791600
references.citation: Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1985 Apr;60(4):343-55
references.pmid: 2579801
references.citation: Brain Lang. 1984 Nov;23(2):225-40
references.pmid: 6518354
references.citation: Science. 2004 Apr 16;304(5669):438-41
references.pmid: 15031438
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2000 Sep;28(6):1022-8
references.pmid: 11105528
references.citation: Psychophysiology. 1993 Jan;30(1):47-61
references.pmid: 8416062
references.citation: Discourse Process. 2004 Apr;37(2):79-89
references.pmid: 25520533
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2007 May;18(5):449-55
references.pmid: 17576286
references.citation: Psychol Rev. 1995 Apr;102(2):211-45
references.pmid: 7740089
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 1998 Mar;123(2):162-85
references.pmid: 9522683
references.citation: Nature. 1984 Jan 12-18;307(5947):161-3
references.pmid: 6690995
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2004 Mar;30(2):451-64
references.pmid: 14979817
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2003 Aug 15;15(6):883-99
references.pmid: 14511541
references.citation: Mem Cognit. 2002 Jul;30(5):779-88
references.pmid: 12219894
references.citation: J Cogn Neurosci. 2004 Jun;16(5):715-26
references.pmid: 15200700