Do different stakeholder groups share mental health research priorities? A four-arm Delphi study.
BACKGROUND
Despite considerable investment in research priority setting within diverse fields of healthcare, little is known about the extent to which different stakeholder groups share research priorities. Conflicting priorities may jeopardize stakeholder engagement in research.


OBJECTIVE
To identify the research priorities of different stakeholder groups within mental health care and examine the extent and nature of agreement between them.


METHODS
Using a Delphi technique, we conducted parallel consultation processes within four different stakeholder groups. Each group process consisted of three rounds.


METHODS
The study was carried out within a mental health and learning disabilities trust in southern England. Participants were recruited from the following groups: mental health service users (34), informal carers (26), mental health practitioners (35) and service managers (23).


RESULTS
There were striking differences between the four groups in respect of their ability and willingness to make priority decisions. These differences notwithstanding, there was considerable overlap in respect of their research interests. All groups identified and attached high importance to issues relating to the promotion of independence, self-esteem and recovery. The quality of in-patient care, the place of psychological therapies and the relationship between physical and mental health also emerged across the board.


CONCLUSIONS
The confluence of four different stakeholder groups around a number of clear themes is highly encouraging, providing a framework within which to construct a research agenda and suggesting that mental health research can be built on solid partnerships.
Owens
Christabel
C
Devon Partnership NHS Trust, Exeter, UK. christabel.owens@pms.ac.uk
Ley
Ann
A
Aitken
Peter
P
D000288:Administrative Personnel; D001294:Attitude to Health; D017028:Caregivers; D018672:Community Health Planning; D003256:Community Participation / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D055812:Community-Based Participatory Research / Q000458:organization & administration*; D003697:Delphi Technique; D004739:England; D006126:Group Processes; D006292:Health Priorities / Q000145:classification*; D006801:Humans; D008605:Mental Health Services / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000592:standards*; D028642:Persons with Psychiatric Disorders; D015279:Organizational Culture; D009937:Organizational Objectives; D019989:Persons with Intellectual Disabilities; D012106:Research / Q000145:classification*; D013222:State Medicine; D014495:Universities
Nurs Res. 1987 Sep-Oct;36(5):309-14
3306612
Health Expect. 2005 Dec;8(4):352-9
16266423
J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2005 Apr;12(2):245-51
15788044
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1998 Nov;98(5):400-5
9845179
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2006 Nov-Dec;40(11-12):972-80
17054565
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2007 Mar;53(2):108-22
17472085
Br J Cancer. 2007 Mar 26;96(6):875-81
17342090
Am J Public Health. 1984 Sep;74(9):979-83
6380323
Nurse Educ Today. 1995 Dec;15(6):439-45
8684364
ORL Head Neck Nurs. 1996 Spring;14(2):16-24
8788362
Psychiatr Serv. 2006 May;57(5):640-5
16675756
BMJ. 1995 Aug 5;311(7001):376-80
7640549
Health Expect. 2005 Sep;8(3):253-63
16098155
Health Technol Assess. 2004 Apr;8(15):1-148, III-IV
15080866
Health Expect. 2006 Mar;9(1):3-12
16436157
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1977;2(3):388-410
591704
Psychol Med. 1999 May;29(3):697-701
10405091