An individualized rehabilitation program in patients with systemic sclerosis may improve quality of life and hand mobility.
Few data are available to assess the efficacy of rehabilitative interventions in systemic sclerosis (SSc). We refer here the results of an individualized rehabilitation program in 16 patients with SSc. In particular, when possible, the number of patients who achieved a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was determined. Results were evaluated taking advantage of the development of validated questionnaires and tests to assess quality of life (QOL) and disability in SSc. At the end of a period of 4 months of observation, 69% and 62% of patients reported an improvement of the physical and mental components of the SF-36 higher than the MCID (as established in other rheumatic conditions). Analogously, an improvement of the impact of respiratory disease on patients' QOL, as assessed by the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire, was perceived by 67% of them. These results might be explained by better exercise tolerance, which was suggested by the significant reduction of the heart rate and of a visual analogue scale for dyspnoea at the end of the 6-min walking test. Finally, a statistically significant improvement of hand mobility, as assessed by the hand mobility in scleroderma test was obtained. This study suggests that a significant proportion of patients with SSc experience an improvement in their perception of QOL, a better exercise tolerance, and a better hand mobility after a rehabilitation program consisting by a 2-week period of daily individual 30-min sessions as outpatient, followed by at-home exercise program.
Antonioli
Chiara M
CM
Rehabilitation Unit, Casa di Cura "Città di Brescia", Brescia, Italy.
Bua
Giovanni
G
Frigè
Anna
A
Prandini
Katia
K
Radici
Sara
S
Scarsi
Mirko
M
Danieli
Elisabetta
E
Malvicini
Andrea
A
Airo
Paolo
P
D000368:Aged; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D017079:Exercise Tolerance; D005260:Female; D050823:Hand Joints / Q000503:physiopathology*; D006306:Health Surveys; D006339:Heart Rate; D006801:Humans; D007558:Italy; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D010147:Pain Measurement; D011788:Quality of Life; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular / Q000502:physiology*; D012129:Respiratory Function Tests; D012595:Scleroderma, Systemic / Q000503:physiopathology* / Q000534:rehabilitation*; D016138:Walking / Q000502:physiology
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Dec 15;53(6):838-44
16342102
J Rheumatol. 1988 Feb;15(2):202-5
3361530
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Apr;155(4):1278-82
9105067
J Rheumatol. 1995 Jul;22(7):1281-5
7562759
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul 1;166(1):111-7
12091180
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007 Feb;46(2):296-301
16877463
Presse Med. 2006 Dec;35(12 Pt 2):1975-82
17159724
Eur Respir J Suppl. 1993 Mar;16:41-52
8499053
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Jul;78(7):767-73
9228882
Arthritis Care Res. 2000 Dec;13(6):382-7
14635314
Arthritis Rheum. 2007 Feb 15;57(1):86-93
17266070
Rev Mal Respir. 1994;11 Suppl 3:5-40
7973051
J Clin Epidemiol. 1998 Nov;51(11):1025-36
9817120
Clin Chest Med. 1994 Jun;15(2):259-69
8088092
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 1993 Mar-Apr;11(2):123-8
8508554
J Clin Invest. 2007 Mar;117(3):557-67
17332883
Reumatismo. 2002 Apr-Jun;54(2):122-7
12105680
Ann Rheum Dis. 2008 May;67(5):703-9
17893248
Chest. 2002 Apr;121(4):1092-8
11948037
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Nov;18(5):419-23
11151395
Respir Med. 1991 Sep;85 Suppl B:25-31; discussion 33-7
1759018
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1984 May;57(5):508-11
6587299
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1994 Sep;26(9):1078-81
7808239
Disabil Rehabil. 2004 Aug 19;26(16):981-7
15371046
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007 Nov-Dec;25(6):878-80
18173923
Med Care. 1992 Jun;30(6):473-83
1593914
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007 Sep-Oct;25(5):722-7
18078620
Ann Rheum Dis. 2006 Oct;65(10):1325-9
16540546
Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Jul;43(7):1478-87
10902749
Arthritis Care Res. 1991 Mar;4(1):27-31
11188583
Clin Rheumatol. 2005 Feb;24(1):48-54
15300468
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007 Mar-Apr;25(2):293-6
17543156
Scand J Rheumatol. 2000;29(5):295-301
11093595