title: Dark adaptation recovery of human rod bipolar cell response kinetics estimated from scotopic b-wave measurements.
abstract: We recorded ganzfeld scotopic ERGs to examine the responses of human rod bipolar cells in vivo, during dark adaptation recovery following bleaching exposures, as well as during adaptation to steady background lights. In order to be able to record responses at relatively early times in recovery, we utilized a 'criterion response amplitude' protocol in which the test flash strength was adjusted to elicit responses of nearly constant amplitude. In order to provide accurate and unbiased measures of response kinetics, we utilized a curve-fitting procedure to fit a smooth function to the measured responses in the vicinity of the peak, thereby extracting both the time-to-peak and the amplitude of the responses. Following bleaching exposures, the responses exhibited both desensitization and accelerated kinetics. During early post-bleach recovery, the flash sensitivity and time-to-peak varied according to a power-law expression (with an exponent of 6), as found in the presence of steady background light. This light-like phenomenon, however, appeared to be set against the backdrop of a second, more slowly recovering 'pure' desensitization, most clearly evident at late post-bleach times. The post-bleach 'equivalent background intensity' derived from measurements of flash sensitivity faded initially with an S2 slope of approximately 0.24 decades min(-1), and later as a gentle S3 tail. When calculated from kinetics, the results displayed only the S2 slope. While the recovery of rod bipolar cell response kinetics can be described accurately by a declining level of opsin in the rods, the sensitivity of these cells is reduced further than expected by this mechanism alone.
authors.affiliation: Division of Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research and ARC Centre of Excellence in Vision Science, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia. allison.cameron@anu.edu.au
authors.forename: A M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Cameron
authors.forename: L
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Miao
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Ruseckaite
authors.forename: M J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Pianta
authors.forename: T D
authors.initials: TD
authors.lastname: Lamb
mesh_terms: D000221:Adaptation, Ocular / Q000502:physiology / Q000528:radiation effects; D000328:Adult; D003623:Dark Adaptation / Q000502:physiology* / Q000528:radiation effects; D004596:Electroretinography; D006801:Humans; D007700:Kinetics; D008875:Middle Aged; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D038761:Photobleaching; D017948:Retinal Rod Photoreceptor Cells / Q000502:physiology* / Q000528:radiation effects
references.citation: J Physiol. 2000 Dec 1;529 Pt 2:469-82
references.pmid: 11101655
references.citation: J Physiol. 2007 Apr 15;580(Pt. 2):397-410
references.pmid: 17255172
references.citation: J Physiol. 1999 Jul 15;518 ( Pt 2):479-96
references.pmid: 10381594
references.citation: J Physiol. 2001 Jul 1;534(Pt 1):217-42
references.pmid: 11433004
references.citation: J Gen Physiol. 1975 Apr;65(4):483-502
references.pmid: 1151323
references.citation: Vision Res. 1999 Nov;39(23):3975-82
references.pmid: 10748929
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996 Jan;37(1):125-41
references.pmid: 8550316
references.citation: Vision Res. 1981;21(12):1773-82
references.pmid: 7336615
references.citation: J Physiol. 2004 Jan 15;554(Pt 2):417-37
references.pmid: 14594984
references.citation: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998 Jan;236(1):31-40
references.pmid: 9457514
references.citation: Prog Retin Eye Res. 2004 May;23(3):307-80
references.pmid: 15177205
references.citation: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994 Feb;35(2):619-25
references.pmid: 8113012
references.citation: J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1996 Mar;13(3):601-12
references.pmid: 8627417
references.citation: J Physiol. 1979 Mar;288:589-611
references.pmid: 112242
references.citation: Doc Ophthalmol. 1998-1999;95(3-4):187-215
references.pmid: 10532405
references.citation: J Physiol. 1971 Dec;219(3):611-23
references.pmid: 5157595
references.citation: J Physiol. 1974 Nov;242(3):729-58
references.pmid: 4449053
references.citation: J Gen Physiol. 1963 Jul;46:1287-301
references.pmid: 14043003
references.citation: J Physiol. 1980 Mar;300:115-50
references.pmid: 7381782
references.citation: Vision Res. 1988;28(11):1263-9
references.pmid: 3267040
references.citation: J Physiol. 1992 Apr;449:719-58
references.pmid: 1326052
references.citation: J Physiol. 1964 Aug;172:239-63
references.pmid: 14205019
references.citation: J Physiol. 2002 Sep 15;543(Pt 3):899-916
references.pmid: 12231647
references.citation: J Physiol. 1980 Dec;309:591-621
references.pmid: 6788941
references.citation: J Physiol. 1982 Nov;332:139-55
references.pmid: 7153925
references.citation: Vis Neurosci. 2001 Jul-Aug;18(4):641-56
references.pmid: 11829310
references.citation: J Physiol. 1958 Apr 30;141(2):337-50
references.pmid: 13539843
references.citation: Vision Res. 2004 Dec;44(28):3253-68
references.pmid: 15535993
references.citation: J Physiol. 2006 Sep 1;575(Pt 2):507-26
references.pmid: 16777945
references.citation: Vision Res. 1995 Feb;35(3):435-42
references.pmid: 7892737