Learning based on patient case reviews: an interview study.
BACKGROUND
Recent theories on adult learning recommend that learning is situated in real-life contexts. Learning is considered a continuous process in which every new experience builds on, and integrates with, previously accumulated experiences. Reviewing and reflecting on patient cases is in line with this learning approach. There has, however, been remarkably little research into how patient cases might be applied in professional education. The purpose of this article is to present family physicians' perceptions of the learning process initiated by reviewing patient cases.


METHODS
Thirteen family physicians, who had all participated in a large project on cancer diagnosis in family practice (the CAP-project), currently carried out at the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Aarhus were interviewed on their experiences of reviewing patient cases. In the CAP-project family physicians (n = 467, 81%) in the County of Aarhus (640 000 inhabitants) completed 2,212 (83%) detailed questionnaires on all newly diagnosed patients with cancer encountered in their practices during a one year period (2004-2005). In order to complete the questionnaire the family physicians were required to perform a systematic case review of each patient: they had to consult their records to provide dates of symptom-presentation, investigations and treatments initiated, and reflect on previous encounters with the patients to give detailed information on his/hers knowledge of the patients' care seeking behaviour, mental health and risk factors.The purpose of this article is to present indebt interview-data on family physicians' perceptions of the learning process initiated by reviewing patient cases, and their evaluations of using patient case reviews as a learning method in family practice.


RESULTS
The process of reflection initiated by reviewing patient cases enabled family physicians to reconsider their clinical work procedures which potentially supported the transition from individual competence to personal capability. According to the physicians, they were not only able to identify needed changes, some reported that they were able to transform these ideas into action and do things more effectively. According to our data this transition takes place, because the learning processes initiated were based on real life experiences which equally initiated reflections on what to improve, as well as how to improve their work.


CONCLUSIONS
Patient case reviews initiate reflective processes providing feedback about performance in real life situations. Family physicians are in favour of patient case reviews as a learning method, because it embraces the complexities they encounter in their daily practice and is based on personal experiences.
Andersen
Rikke Sand
RS
The Research Unit for General Practice, University of Aarhus, Arhus, Denmark. rsa@alm.au.dk
Hansen
Rikke Pilegaard
RP
Søndergaard
Jens
J
Bro
Flemming
F
D003718:Denmark; D005194:Family Practice / Q000193:education; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D007858:Learning; D008485:Medical Audit; D010820:Physicians; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
BMJ. 2001 Nov 10;323(7321):1100-2
11701576
Soc Sci Med. 2002 Nov;55(10):1771-7
12383461
Med Educ. 2001 Sep;35(9):818-9
11555216
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2000 Fall;20(4):238-46
11201063
Fam Med. 1991 Feb;23(2):145-51
2037216
BMJ. 2001 Oct 6;323(7316):799-803
11588088
BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Feb 28;8:49
18307790
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2002 Fall;22(4):244-51
12613060
BMJ. 1998 Feb 7;316(7129):466-8
9492684
Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Jun;43(371):249-53
8373649
J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Summer;26(3):230-43
16986148
JAMA. 1992 Sep 2;268(9):1111-7
1501333
BMJ. 2001 Sep 15;323(7313):625-8
11557716
BMC Fam Pract. 2006 Mar 21;7:19
16549036
Med Educ. 2001 Sep;35(9):862-6
11555224
BMJ. 1998 Feb 21;316(7131):621-4
9518922