title: Differences between older Chinese men and women from Hong Kong in the impact of urinary incontinence on their lives.
abstract: This study reports the epidemiology of urinary incontinence (UI) and its impact on the social lives of older Chinese people in Hong Kong, a modern city in China. It also examines the relationship between sex and this impact, as well as the extent of UI in a convenience sample of 101 sufferers aged 60 or older. This study was cross-sectional and used face-to-face interviews with a structured questionnaire. A number of findings concur with studies conducted in Western countries. Prevalence of UI increased with adult age, and it affected women more than men. UI had a negative impact on 86.1% of the incontinent respondents. There were no significant differences between men and women in the duration of UI, the level of UI, or health status. Out of the nine impacts on social lives, only one showed a significant difference between older men and women: "restriction on opportunities to participate in social activities." Statistically, men tended to report more negative impacts than women. More than 80% of the respondents were affected by their UI. The impact of UI on social lives was basically the same for men and women, though men reported significantly more social impacts than did women. However, this study does not support the claim that the social life of those who reported more social impacts was worse than that of those who reported fewer.
authors.affiliation: Department of Social Work, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, NT, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China. jiklee@cuhk.edu.hk
authors.forename: Jik-Joen
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Lee
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002681:China / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000208:ethnology; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005260:Female; D006723:Hong Kong; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008016:Life Change Events; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D014549:Urinary Incontinence / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000523:psychology*
references.citation: J Clin Nurs. 2000 Mar;9(2):178-87
references.pmid: 11111607
references.citation: South Med J. 2001 Oct;94(10):952-7
references.pmid: 11702823
references.citation: Br Med J. 1980 Nov 8;281(6250):1243-5
references.pmid: 7427654
references.citation: Am J Nurs. 2003 Mar;Suppl:20-5
references.pmid: 12612490
references.citation: Geriatrics. 1996 Apr;51(4):47-51
references.pmid: 8626078
references.citation: Int J Urol. 2000 Mar;7(3):95-103
references.pmid: 10750888
references.citation: J Aging Health. 2000 Feb;12(1):25-46
references.pmid: 10848124
references.citation: Am J Nurs. 2003 Mar;Suppl:26-35
references.pmid: 12612491
references.citation: Am Fam Physician. 1996 Oct;54(5):1661-72
references.pmid: 8857788
references.citation: Qual Life Res. 1998 May;7(4):337-44
references.pmid: 9610217
references.citation: BMJ. 2000 Nov 25;321(7272):1326-31
references.pmid: 11090517
references.citation: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 May;52(5):712-8
references.pmid: 15086650
references.citation: Nurs Manage. 1995 Apr;26(4):48Q, 48S-48T
references.pmid: 7731598
references.citation: J Clin Nurs. 2001 Jan;10(1):15-24
references.pmid: 11820232
references.citation: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2001 Jul;49(7):892-9
references.pmid: 11527480
references.citation: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002 Mar;50(3):489-95
references.pmid: 11943045
references.citation: Public Health Nurs. 2000 Nov-Dec;17(6):468-73
references.pmid: 11115145
references.citation: Age Ageing. 1979 May;8(2):81-5
references.pmid: 463679