Biomechanical comparison of different volar fracture fixation plates for distal radius fractures.
The purpose of this study was to compare the biomechanical properties of four volar fixed-angle fracture fixation plate designs in a novel sawbones model as well as in cadavers. Four volar fixed angle plating systems (Hand Innovations DVR-A, Avanta SCS/V, Wright Medical Lo-Con VLS, and Synthes stainless volar locking) were tested on sawbones models using an osteotomy gap model to simulate a distal radius fracture. Based on a power analysis, six plates from each system were tested to failure in axial compression. To simulate loads with physiologic wrist motion, six plates of each type were then tested to failure following 10,000 cycles applying 100N of compression. To compare plate failure behavior, two plates of each type were implanted in cadaver wrists and similar testing applied. All plate constructs were loaded to failure. All failed with in apex volar angulation. The Hand Innovations DVR-A plate demonstrated significantly more strength in peak load to failure and failure after fatigue cycling (p value < 0.001 for single load and fatigue failure). However, there was no significant difference in stiffness among the four plates in synthetic bone. The cadaveric model demonstrated the same mode of failure as the sawbones. None of the volar plates demonstrated screw breakage or pullout, except the tine plate (Avanta SCS/V) with 1 mm of pullout in 2 of 12 plates. This study demonstrates the utility of sawbones in biomechanical testing and indicates that volar fixation of unstable distal radius fractures with a fixed angle device is a reliable means of stabilization.
Sobky
Kareem
K
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 E. 9th Avenue, B202, Denver, CO, 80262, USA.
Baldini
Todd
T
Thomas
Kenneth
K
Bach
Joel
J
Williams
Allison
A
Wolf
Jennifer Moriatis
JM
J Hand Surg Am. 2003 Jan;28(1):94-104
12563644
J Hand Surg Br. 2003 Jun;28(3):263-6
12809662
J Hand Surg Am. 2002 Mar;27(2):205-15
11901379
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2007 Jun;22(5):510-7
17328995
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 May-Jun;31(5):771-9
16713841
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002 Aug;84(8):1315-22
12177259
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Apr;445:58-67
16505728
J Orthop Trauma. 2005 Mar;19(3):187-91
15758672
J Hand Surg Am. 2004 May;29(3):446-51
15140488
J Orthop Trauma. 2006 Feb;20(2):115-21
16462564
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997 Sep;79(9):1303-12
9314392
J Hand Surg Br. 2000 Dec;25(6):528-34
11106513
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Mar;31(3):359-65
16516728
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Mar;31(3):382-6
16516731
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Sep;31(7):1061-7
16945704
J Hand Surg Am. 1997 Sep;22(5):777-84
9330133
J Hand Surg Am. 2006 Dec;31(10):1587-93
17145377
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986 Jun;68(5):647-59
3722221
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Oct;85(10):1956-60
14563804
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Nov;88(11):2411-7
17079398
Ann Plast Surg. 2000 May;44(5):564-6
10805309
Chir Main. 2001 Jun;20(3):218-25
11496608
Instr Course Lect. 1999;48:465-80
10098077
J Trauma. 2006 Sep;61(3):668-72
16967005
J Hand Surg Am. 2002 Jul;27(4):724-8
12132102
J Hand Surg Am. 1990 May;15(3):393-400
2348055
J Hand Surg Am. 2007 Feb;32(2):194-9
17275594
J Hand Surg Am. 1998 Jan;23(1):127-34
9523966