Imperfect vertical transmission of the endophyte Neotyphodium in exotic grasses in grasslands of the flooding pampa.
Cool-season grasses establish symbioses with vertically transmitted Neotyphodium endophytes widespread in nature. The frequency of endophyte-infected plants in closed populations (i.e., without migrations) depends on both the differential fitness between infected and non-infected plants, and the endophyte-transmission efficiency. Most studies have been focused on the first mechanism ignoring the second. Infection frequency and endophyte transmission from vegetative tissues to seeds were surveyed in two grasses growing in vegetation units that differ in flood and grazing regimes, and soil salinity. Transmission efficiency and infection frequency for tall fescue did not vary significantly and were 0.98 and 1.00, respectively. For Italian ryegrass, transmission efficiency and infection frequency were 0.88 and 0.57 in humid prairies, and 0.96 and 0.96 in the other vegetation units. Only in humid mesophytic meadows, the observed pattern was irrespective of the presence or absence of grazers. Our results suggest that selection forces for endophyte infection are different for both species. Imperfect transmission was only compensated in tall fescue through an increased fitness of infected plants. Interpreting variations of infection frequency only in terms of differential fitness can be misleading, considering that endophyte transmission can be imperfect and variable in nature. Therefore, this study highlights the importance of measuring transmission efficiency.
Gundel
Pedro E
PE
IFEVA-CONICET, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Av. San Martín 4453, Buenos Aires, 1417 CP, Argentina. gundel@agro.uba.ar
Garibaldi
Lucas A
LA
Tognetti
Pedro M
PM
Aragón
Roxana
R
Ghersa
Claudio M
CM
Omacini
Marina
M
D000818:Animals; D001118:Argentina; D002417:Cattle; D017753:Ecosystem; D055868:Floods; D055328:Neotyphodium / Q000502:physiology*; D006109:Poaceae / Q000382:microbiology*; D012639:Seeds / Q000382:microbiology; D012988:Soil Microbiology; D013559:Symbiosis
Am Nat. 2002 Oct;160 Suppl 4:S99-S127
18707456
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000 Feb;75(1):65-93
10740893
Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Feb;14(2):49-53
10234251
Am Nat. 2008 Sep;172(3):405-16
18657030
Ann Bot. 2005 Sep;96(4):501-5
16217870
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2003 Aug;69(8):4403-7
12902222
Oecologia. 2005 Jul;144(3):463-71
15942761
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Apr 22;275(1637):897-905
18198146
FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 Jul;61(1):164-73
17466027
Ecology. 2007 Nov;88(11):2752-7
18051643
Microb Ecol. 2006 Nov;52(4):748-55
16944342
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 30;102(35):12465-70
16116093
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 Jul 7;269(1498):1397-403
12079664