title: Is mate choice in humans MHC-dependent?
abstract: In several species, including rodents and fish, it has been shown that the Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) influences mating preferences and, in some cases, that this may be mediated by preferences based on body odour. In humans, the picture has been less clear. Several studies have reported a tendency for humans to prefer MHC-dissimilar mates, a sexual selection that would favour the production of MHC-heterozygous offspring, who would be more resistant to pathogens, but these results are unsupported by other studies. Here, we report analyses of genome-wide genotype data (from the HapMap II dataset) and HLA types in African and European American couples to test whether humans tend to choose MHC-dissimilar mates. In order to distinguish MHC-specific effects from genome-wide effects, the pattern of similarity in the MHC region is compared to the pattern in the rest of the genome. African spouses show no significant pattern of similarity/dissimilarity across the MHC region (relatedness coefficient, R = 0.015, p = 0.23), whereas across the genome, they are more similar than random pairs of individuals (genome-wide R = 0.00185, p<10(-3)). We discuss several explanations for these observations, including demographic effects. On the other hand, the sampled European American couples are significantly more MHC-dissimilar than random pairs of individuals (R = -0.043, p = 0.015), and this pattern of dissimilarity is extreme when compared to the rest of the genome, both globally (genome-wide R = -0.00016, p = 0.739) and when broken into windows having the same length and recombination rate as the MHC (only nine genomic regions exhibit a higher level of genetic dissimilarity between spouses than does the MHC). This study thus supports the hypothesis that the MHC influences mate choice in some human populations.
authors.affiliation: Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. chaix@mnhn.fr
authors.forename: Raphaëlle
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Chaix
authors.forename: Chen
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Cao
authors.forename: Peter
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Donnelly
mesh_terms: D044383:Black People / Q000235:genetics; D002755:Choice Behavior; D015894:Genome, Human; D005838:Genotype; D006680:HLA Antigens / Q000235:genetics; D006801:Humans; D008285:Major Histocompatibility Complex; D010641:Phenotype; D020641:Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide; D012641:Selection, Genetic; D012725:Sexual Behavior; D044465:White People / Q000235:genetics
chemical_list: D006680:HLA Antigens
references.citation: Behav Genet. 1989 Sep;19(5):659-74
references.pmid: 2508616
references.citation: Trends Immunol. 2005 Sep;26(9):496-502
references.pmid: 16027037
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Sep;61(3):497-504
references.pmid: 9326314
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2002 Apr;3(4):262-73
references.pmid: 11967551
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Nov 7;270 Suppl 2:S254-6
references.pmid: 14667398
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Apr 7;272(1564):759-67
references.pmid: 15870038
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Mar 18;94(6):2210-4
references.pmid: 9122173
references.citation: Nature. 2005 Oct 27;437(7063):1299-320
references.pmid: 16255080
references.citation: Science. 1988 Jun 3;240(4857):1331-2
references.pmid: 3375818
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2002 Feb;30(2):175-9
references.pmid: 11799397
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jun 22;268(1473):1279-85
references.pmid: 11410155
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 May 7;273(1590):1111-6
references.pmid: 16600889
references.citation: Science. 2004 Nov 5;306(5698):1033-7
references.pmid: 15528444
references.citation: Heredity (Edinb). 2002 May;88(5):371-80
references.pmid: 11986874
references.citation: Am J Reprod Immunol. 2002 Jul;48(1):34-42
references.pmid: 12322894
references.citation: Science. 1996 Apr 5;272(5258):67-74
references.pmid: 8600539
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 16;96(4):1522-5
references.pmid: 9990056
references.citation: Am Nat. 1999 Feb;153(2):145-164
references.pmid: 29578757
references.citation: Nature. 1991 Aug 15;352(6336):619-21
references.pmid: 1865924
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Oct 18;449(7164):851-61
references.pmid: 17943122
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Oct 22;264(1387):1471-9
references.pmid: 9364787
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2007 Feb;33(2):417-34
references.pmid: 17191155
references.citation: J Exp Med. 1976 Nov 2;144(5):1324-35
references.pmid: 1032893
references.citation: Physiol Behav. 1998 Jun 1;64(3):235-43
references.pmid: 9748088
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 2007 Sep;81(3):559-75
references.pmid: 17701901
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2004 Dec;5(12):889-99
references.pmid: 15573121
references.citation: Nature. 1987 May 14-20;327(6118):161-4
references.pmid: 3574476
references.citation: Nat Genet. 2006 Oct;38(10):1166-72
references.pmid: 16998491
references.citation: Anim Behav. 1998 Aug;56(2):319-327
references.pmid: 9787022
references.citation: Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Sep;61(3):505-11
references.pmid: 9326315
references.citation: FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2007 Mar;59(3):576-83
references.pmid: 17381516
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 1995 Jun 22;260(1359):245-9
references.pmid: 7630893