Mycorrhizal networks and distance from mature trees alter patterns of competition and facilitation in dry Douglas-fir forests.
The distribution of dry Douglas-fir forests in western North America is expected to shift northward with climate change and disappear from the grassland interface in the southern interior of British Columbia. This shift may be accentuated by clearcutting, a common harvesting practice that aims to reduce the competitive effects of residual mature trees on new regeneration, but in so doing, ignores their facilitative effects. In this study, we investigated the net effects of competition from and facilitation by mature trees retained on harvested sites on seedling establishment in the dry interface Douglas-fir forests. We demonstrate that access to a mycorrhizal network (MN) and proximity to trees have important influences on seedling performance. On six sites, we established trenched plots around 24 mature Pseudotsuga menziesii var. glauca (Douglas-fir) trees, then planted Douglas-fir seedlings into four mesh treatments that served to restrict MN access (i.e., planted into mesh bags with 0.5-, 35-, or 250-microm pores, or without mesh) or into impermeable bags (grown in isolation) at four distances (0.5, 1.0, 2.5, or 5.0 m). Seedling survival tended to be greater and water stress lower where seedlings had full access to the MN. Seedling height, shoot biomass, needle biomass, and nutrient uptake peaked at 2.5-5.0 m from mature trees. Seedlings 0.5 m from mature trees had lower CO2 assimilation rates and wood delta(13)C compared to seedlings 5.0 m away. Competition for soil resources was highest near mature trees but facilitation was relatively greater at further distances, resulting in a zone of net benefit for seedlings. These results show that intraspecific tree-seedling interactions are both competitive and facilitative in dry Douglas-fir forests, and that they are spatially dependent. After disturbance, maintaining residual mature trees may be important for their beneficial regeneration zones.
Teste
François P
FP
Department of Forest Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada. fteste@interchange.ubc.ca
Simard
Suzanne W
SW
D001955:British Columbia; D017753:Ecosystem; D015233:Models, Statistical; D038821:Mycorrhizae / Q000502:physiology*; D028224:Pseudotsuga / Q000254:growth & development / Q000382:microbiology*; D036226:Seedlings / Q000254:growth & development* / Q000382:microbiology; D012987:Soil / Q000032:analysis; D012988:Soil Microbiology; D014197:Trees / Q000254:growth & development / Q000382:microbiology
D012987:Soil
Ecology. 2007 Mar;88(3):567-74
17503583
Ecol Appl. 2006 Apr;16(2):540-54
16711043
New Phytol. 2006;171(1):187-97
16771994
Trends Ecol Evol. 1994 May;9(5):191-3
21236818
J Exp Bot. 2007;58(6):1473-83
17350936
Oecologia. 2005 Aug;145(1):123-31
15891858
Oecologia. 2007 Dec;154(3):455-66
17885766
New Phytol. 2006;169(1):6-8
16390414
Mycorrhiza. 2006 Dec;17(1):51-65
17106724
Ecology. 2006 Nov;87(11):2773-86
17168022
Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Feb;14(2):70-71
10234257
New Phytol. 2006;170(2):381-90
16608462
Tree Physiol. 1997 Aug-Sep;17(8_9):521-535
14759825
New Phytol. 2005 Jun;166(3):993-1009
15869658
J Exp Bot. 2000 Apr;51(345):659-68
10938857
Trends Ecol Evol. 2006 Nov;21(11):621-8
16843567
Oecologia. 1993 Oct;95(4):565-574
28313298
Mycorrhiza. 2006 Jul;16(5):299-363
16845554
Oecologia. 2006 Jun;148(3):464-74
16496180
New Phytol. 2006;169(1):169-78
16390428
New Phytol. 2007;176(2):437-447
17888121
Tree Physiol. 2007 Jan;27(1):133-40
17169914
Ecol Lett. 2005 Nov;8(11):1191-200
21352443