Context-dependent functions of avian duets revealed by microphone-array recordings and multispeaker playback.
In many tropical animals, male and female breeding partners combine their songs to produce vocal duets [1-5]. Duets are often so highly coordinated that human listeners mistake them for the songs of a single animal [6]. Behavioral ecologists rank duets among the most complex vocal performances in the animal kingdom [7, 8]. Despite much research, the evolutionary significance of duets remains elusive [9], in part because many duetting animals live in tropical habitats where dense vegetation makes behavioral observation difficult or impossible. Here, we evaluate the duetting behavior of rufous-and-white wrens (Thryothorus rufalbus) in the humid forests of Costa Rica. We employ two innovative technical approaches to study duetting behavior: an eight-microphone acoustic location system capable of triangulating animals' positions on the basis of recordings of their vocalizations [10] and dual-speaker playback capable of simulating duets in a spatially realistic manner [11]. Our analyses provide the first detailed spatial information on duetting in both a natural context and during confrontations with rivals. We demonstrate that birds perform duets across highly variable distances, that birds approach their partner after performing duets, and that duets of rivals induce aggressive, sex-specific responses. We conclude that duets serve distinct functions in aggressive and nonaggressive contexts.
Mennill
Daniel J
DJ
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Windsor, 401 Sunset Avenue, Windsor, Ontario N9B3P4, Canada. dmennill@uwindsor.ca
Vehrencamp
Sandra L
SL
D000161:Acoustic Stimulation; D000162:Acoustics; D000818:Animals; D003364:Costa Rica; D017753:Ecosystem; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D010152:Pair Bond; D020308:Songbirds / Q000502:physiology*; D014828:Vocalization, Animal
Brain Behav Evol. 1999;53(4):187-97
10343085
Science. 1961 May 26;133(3465):1689-93
13762154
Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Dec 7;274(1628):3005-10
17895228
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2002 Feb;77(1):57-76
11911374
Mol Ecol. 2002 Nov;11(11):2195-212
12406233
J Acoust Soc Am. 2006 May;119(5 Pt 1):2832-9
16708941
BMC Ecol. 2004 Jan 28;4:1
15005805
Anim Behav. 2000 Nov;60(5):667-677
11082237
Biol Lett. 2006 Mar 22;2(1):1-4
17148310