Priority criteria tool for elective specialist level adolescent psychiatric care predicts treatment received.
BACKGROUND
Little validation data has so far been published on scoring systems and the literature on prioritization in psychiatry is especially meagre.


OBJECTIVE
To explore if the priority criteria score for elective specialist level adolescent psychiatric care in Finland is associated with treatment received and whether the association between the priority criteria scores and treatment given is similar among different subgroups.


METHODS
Adolescents currently in treatment contact in three adolescent psychiatric outpatient clinics (n = 450) were rated according to the criteria of the priority rating tool for specialist level adolescent psychiatric care and information about adolescent's age, sex, diagnosis, and treatments was gathered using a structured form.


RESULTS
When sex, age and psychiatric diagnosis were controlled for, the likelihood of receiving specific therapies and medications was significantly associated with the highest priority scores. Except for very frequent individual therapy, there were no differences in the probability of receiving any psychosocial treatment or medication between the sexes. Receiving individual therapy, lengthy treatment contacts and medications were more frequent among older adolescents. The rating tool worked best among adolescents with affective or anxious disorders and worst among those with conduct disorders.


CONCLUSIONS
The present study indicates that the structured tool used in Finland, originally modified from a Canadian priority rating tool for child and adolescent psychiatry, is able to identify adolescents requiring specified, multiple and lengthy treatments, indicating a need for specialist level services. The scoring system tested is a good candidate for a transparent prioritization tool for European adolescent psychiatric services.
Isojoki
I
I
Faculty of Medicine, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Fröjd
S
S
Rantanen
P
P
Laukkanen
E
E
Närhi
P
P
Kaltiala-Heino
R
R
D000293:Adolescent; D000296:Adolescent Psychiatry / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods*; D002648:Child; D005260:Female; D005387:Finland; D006292:Health Priorities; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D001523:Mental Disorders / Q000523:psychology / Q000628:therapy*; D008605:Mental Health Services; D011619:Psychotropic Drugs / Q000627:therapeutic use; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D055815:Young Adult
D011619:Psychotropic Drugs
Nord J Psychiatry. 2005;59(6):481-5
16316901
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1999 Mar;8(1):1-10
10367735
Br J Ophthalmol. 2002 Jan;86(1):57-61
11801505
BMJ. 1999 Feb 13;318(7181):412-4
9974435
J Consult Clin Psychol. 1992 Dec;60(6):881-92
1360990
Hosp Q. 2002 Spring;5(3):28-32
12055863
CMAJ. 2000 May 2;162(9):1297-300
10813011
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2001 Mar;10(1):28-36
11315533
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2002 Apr;41(4):367-76; discussion 376-7
11931592
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2004 Fall;20(4):509-15
15609803
CMAJ. 2000 May 2;162(9):1305-10
10813013
Can J Surg. 2002 Oct;45(5):328-9
12387533
Health Policy. 2002 May;60(2):171-84
11897375
Psychol Med. 2001 Jul;31(5):791-801
11459377
BMJ. 1997 Jan 11;314(7074):131-4
9006477
Am J Psychiatry. 1998 Jan;155(1):62-9
9433340
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2003 Jan;8(1):48-54
12683434
J Eval Clin Pract. 2003 Feb;9(1):23-31
12558699
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007 Jun;16(4):260-70
17171572
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2001 Jun;36(6):294-8
11583459
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2005 Jul;46(7):675-89
15972065
Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983 Nov;40(11):1228-31
6639293
Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006 Jun;15(4):220-31
16502209
CMAJ. 2000 Oct 3;163(7):857-60
11033717