Partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide successful predicts cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the field: a prospective observational study.
BACKGROUND
Prognosis in patients suffering out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is poor. Higher survival rates have been observed only in patients with ventricular fibrillation who were fortunate enough to have basic and advanced life support initiated soon after cardiac arrest. An ability to predict cardiac arrest outcomes would be useful for resuscitation. Changes in expired end-tidal carbon dioxide levels during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may be a useful, noninvasive predictor of successful resuscitation and survival from cardiac arrest, and could help in determining when to cease CPR efforts.


METHODS
This is a prospective, observational study of 737 cases of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. The patients were intubated and measurements of end-tidal carbon dioxide taken. Data according to the Utstein criteria, demographic information, medical data, and partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PetCO2) values were collected for each patient in cardiac arrest by the emergency physician. We hypothesized that an end-tidal carbon dioxide level of 1.9 kPa (14.3 mmHg) or more after 20 minutes of standard advanced cardiac life support would predict restoration of spontaneous circulation (ROSC).


RESULTS
PetCO2 after 20 minutes of advanced life support averaged 0.92 +/- 0.29 kPa (6.9 +/- 2.2 mmHg) in patients who did not have ROSC and 4.36 +/- 1.11 kPa (32.8 +/- 9.1 mmHg) in those who did (P < 0.001). End-tidal carbon dioxide values of 1.9 kPa (14.3 mmHg) or less discriminated between the 402 patients with ROSC and 335 patients without. When a 20-minute end-tidal carbon dioxide value of 1.9 kPa (14.3 mmHg) or less was used as a screening test to predict ROSC, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were all 100%.


CONCLUSIONS
End-tidal carbon dioxide levels of more than 1.9 kPa (14.3 mmHg) after 20 minutes may be used to predict ROSC with accuracy. End-tidal carbon dioxide levels should be monitored during CPR and considered a useful prognostic value for determining the outcome of resuscitative efforts and when to cease CPR in the field.
Kolar
Miran
M
Medikmiko-General Practice, Gregorciceva, 3000 Celje, Slovenia.
Krizmaric
Miljenko
M
Klemen
Petra
P
Grmec
Stefek
S
D000368:Aged; D002245:Carbon Dioxide / Q000502:physiology*; D016887:Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation / Q000639:trends*; D005260:Female; D006323:Heart Arrest / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000628:therapy; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010313:Partial Pressure; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011446:Prospective Studies; D013990:Tidal Volume / Q000502:physiology*
D002245:Carbon Dioxide
Crit Care Med. 1990 Apr;18(4):358-62
2108000
Resuscitation. 2006 Feb;68(2):231-7
16325314
N Engl J Med. 1997 Jul 31;337(5):301-6
9233867
JAMA. 1989 Sep 8;262(10):1347-51
2761035
JAMA. 1993 Sep 22-29;270(12):1457-62
8204131
N Engl J Med. 1988 Mar 10;318(10):607-11
3125432
Resuscitation. 2007 Mar;72(3):404-14
17161518
Resuscitation. 2007 Aug;74(2):253-8
17363129
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2003 Jan;26(1P2):515-7
12687881
Chest. 1995 Oct;108(4):1009-17
7555111
Circulation. 2005 Apr 26;111(16):2134-42
15851620
Ann Emerg Med. 1991 Apr;20(4):355-61
2003661
Resuscitation. 2004 Jun;61(3):315-25
15172711
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Jan;12(1):65-70
15635140
N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 3;355(5):478-87
16885551
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1989 Apr;13(5):1184-9
2494245
Resuscitation. 1978;6(4):259-63
755268
Resuscitation. 2003 Jul;58(1):37-47
12867308
JAMA. 1994 Mar 2;271(9):678-83
8309030
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2005 Jul-Sep;9(3):276-81
16147475
Acad Emerg Med. 2008 Jun;15(6):517-21
18616436
N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 3;355(5):510-2
16885556
Crit Care. 2007;11(2):R39
17376225
Curr Opin Crit Care. 2002 Jun;8(3):224-9
12386501
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 26;348(26):2626-33
12826637
Crit Care. 2003 Dec;7(6):R139-44
14624688
Resuscitation. 1991 Oct;22(2):129-37
1661018
Am J Emerg Med. 1994 May;12(3):267-70
8179728
Eur J Emerg Med. 1999 Dec;6(4):323-30
10646921