title: Social fishes and single mothers: brain evolution in African cichlids.
abstract: As with any organ, differences in brain size--after adequate control of allometry--are assumed to be a response to selection. With over 200 species and an astonishing diversity in niche preferences and social organization, Tanganyikan cichlids present an excellent opportunity to study brain evolution. We used phylogenetic comparative analyses of sexed adults from 39 Tanganyikan cichlid species in a multiple regression framework to investigate the influence of ecology, sexual selection and parental care patterns on whole brain size, as well as to analyse sex-specific effects. First, using species-specific measures, we analysed the influence of diet, habitat, form of care (mouthbrooding or substrate guarding), care type (biparental or female only) and intensity of sexual selection on brain size, while controlling for body size. Then, we repeated the analyses for male and female brain size separately. Type of diet and care type were significantly correlated with whole brain size. Sex-specific analyses showed that female brain size correlated significantly with care type while male brain size was uncorrelated with care type. Our results suggest that more complex social interactions associated with diet select for larger brains and further that the burden of uniparental care exerts high cognitive demands on females.
authors.affiliation: Animal Ecology, Department of Evolutionary Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18 D, 75236 Uppsala, Sweden. alejandro.gonzalezvoyer@ebc.uu.se
authors.forename: Alejandro
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Gonzalez-Voyer
authors.forename: Svante
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Winberg
authors.forename: Niclas
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Kolm
mesh_terms: D000349:Africa; D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D005075:Biological Evolution; D049628:Body Size; D001921:Brain / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D023681:Cichlids / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000235:genetics / Q000502:physiology*; D004032:Diet; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D008425:Maternal Behavior; D052586:Mating Preference, Animal; D009929:Organ Size; D010802:Phylogeny; D012044:Regression Analysis; D012727:Sex Characteristics; D012919:Social Behavior; D013045:Species Specificity
references.citation: Pediatr Res. 2008 Mar;63(3):308-14
references.pmid: 18287970
references.citation: Anim Cogn. 2002 Mar;5(1):1-13
references.pmid: 11957395
references.citation: Neuroscience. 2008 Apr 9;152(4):859-66
references.pmid: 18329816
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Mar 22;273(1587):719-24
references.pmid: 16608692
references.citation: Evolution. 1980 Mar;34(2):292-305
references.pmid: 28563426
references.citation: J Hirnforsch. 1988;29(3):341-52
references.pmid: 3418119
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Jan 22;272(1559):179-86
references.pmid: 15695209
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Mar 22;274(1611):763-9
references.pmid: 17251112
references.citation: Brain Behav Evol. 2003;62(2):72-82
references.pmid: 12937346
references.citation: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 29;362(1480):649-58
references.pmid: 17301028
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1993 Aug;8(8):279-84
references.pmid: 21236169
references.citation: Evolution. 2008 Aug;62(8):2015-26
references.pmid: 18489718
references.citation: Syst Biol. 2002 Feb;51(1):113-35
references.pmid: 11943095
references.citation: Curr Biol. 2007 Aug 21;17(16):R714-23
references.pmid: 17714665
references.citation: Am Nat. 2002 Dec;160(6):712-26
references.pmid: 18707460
references.citation: Brain Behav Evol. 2007;69(4):280-300
references.pmid: 17314475
references.citation: Evolution. 2005 Dec;59(12):2705-10
references.pmid: 16526516
references.citation: Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol. 2003 Sep;136(1):5-15
references.pmid: 14527625
references.citation: Brain Behav Evol. 2005;65(4):244-61
references.pmid: 15761217
references.citation: Brain Behav Evol. 2007;69(2):76-86
references.pmid: 17230015
references.citation: Trends Ecol Evol. 1996 Feb;11(2):82-6
references.pmid: 21237767
references.citation: Anim Behav. 1998 Nov;56(5):1177-1183
references.pmid: 9819334
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Feb 22;274(1609):453-64
references.pmid: 17476764
references.citation: Biol Lett. 2006 Dec 22;2(4):557-60
references.pmid: 17148287
references.citation: Brain Behav Evol. 2002;60(3):165-80
references.pmid: 12417821
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jun 7;91(12):5495-7
references.pmid: 8202515
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Jan 22;273(1583):207-15
references.pmid: 16555789
references.citation: Nature. 2001 May 10;411(6834):189-93
references.pmid: 11346794
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2003 Aug 12;19(12):1572-4
references.pmid: 12912839
references.citation: Science. 2001 Dec 14;294(5550):2310-4
references.pmid: 11743192
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Oct 22;274(1625):2563-9
references.pmid: 17698490
references.citation: Brain Behav Evol. 2007;70(1):21-39
references.pmid: 17389793
references.citation: Brain Behav Evol. 2002;59(5-6):240-9
references.pmid: 12207081
references.citation: Brain Behav Evol. 2005;65(4):215-30
references.pmid: 15761215
references.citation: Bioinformatics. 2004 Jan 22;20(2):289-90
references.pmid: 14734327
references.citation: Brain Behav Evol. 1997;50(3):167-82
references.pmid: 9288416
references.citation: Nature. 2001 Feb 8;409(6821):710-4
references.pmid: 11217859
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Sep 7;273(1598):2241-7
references.pmid: 16901845
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Jan 22;272(1559):159-66
references.pmid: 15695206