Phenotypic and genetic characterization of the pistillate mutation in tomato.
Many floral phenotypes have been described in decades of tomato genetics, but for very few of them the underlying genes have been identified so far. Because the increasing availability of genome sequence data will facilitate forward genetics in tomato, novel descriptive and map information will help the attribution of genes to phenotypes. In this contribution, we present our work on pistillate (pi), a genotype that directly recalls mutations affecting class B MADS-box genes, but that has not been further characterized after the first description. Plants homozygous for the pi allele appear with Mendelian proportions and, compared to wild-type, show delayed flowering, a frequently modified sympodial segment, higher occurrence of compound inflorescences, and reversion of the floral meristem to vegetative identity. In pi mutant flowers, the most striking aberration is the homeotic transformation of stamens into carpels. Ultrastructural analysis also reveals more or less subtle sepaloid features in the three inner floral whorls, mainly based on the presence, distribution and amount of glandular and non glandular trichomes. In the ovary, a 'flower within flower' phenotype was seldom observed; in one instance such phenotype was coupled with the setting of a parthenocarpic fruit, that reiterated the differentiation of a new flower. Mapping experiments positioned PI on the distal end of the long arm of chromosome 3. This position was not compatible with any class B or E MADS box gene; differently, the PI genetic window contained the FALSIFLORA (FA) gene, the tomato orthologue of LEAFY (LFY). The pi defects in flowering time and inflorescence development are in agreement with a direct involvement of the floral meristem identity gene. The class B- and E-like phenotypes shown by pi mutant plants are likely an indirect consequence because FA, as LFY, is reported as a positive regulator of homeotic MADS-box genes. Because fa mutant plants do not form complete flowers, the pi mutation deserves a particular interest, producing four-whorled, although modified, flowers useful to study the functional linkage between flower induction and flower organ identity specification.
Olimpieri
Irene
I
Dipartimento di Agrobiologia e Agrochimica, Università degli Studi della Tuscia, 01100, Viterbo, Italy.
Mazzucato
Andrea
A
D000483:Alleles; D002874:Chromosome Mapping; D032461:Chromosomes, Plant; D018744:DNA, Plant / Q000235:genetics; D035264:Flowers / Q000235:genetics / Q000648:ultrastructure*; D018551:Solanum lycopersicum / Q000235:genetics* / Q000254:growth & development; D018519:Meristem / Q000166:cytology / Q000235:genetics; D008855:Microscopy, Electron, Scanning; D009154:Mutation; D010641:Phenotype
D018744:DNA, Plant
Plant Cell. 1992 Aug;4(8):901-913
12297664
Cell. 1992 May 29;69(5):843-59
1350515
Mol Gen Genet. 1995 Jul 28;248(2):195-206
7651343
Science. 2002 Apr 12;296(5566):343-6
11951045
J Exp Bot. 2004 Aug;55(403):1671-85
15258170
Theor Appl Genet. 2004 Jan;108(2):209-16
14564391
Plant Cell. 1995 Dec;7(12):2001-11
8718618
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Apr 18;103(16):6398-403
16606827
Plant Cell. 1995 Nov;7(11):1859-68
8535139
Development. 2003 Jun;130(11):2385-95
12702653
Development. 1998 Feb;125(4):733-42
9435293
Plant Cell. 2003 Apr;15(4):914-25
12671087
J Exp Bot. 2006;57(6):1381-90
16547125
Plant Physiol. 2002 Oct;130(2):605-17
12376628
Curr Biol. 2004 Nov 9;14(21):1935-40
15530395
Plant Cell. 1991 Aug;3(8):771-781
12324613
Plant J. 1991 Sep;1(2):255-66
1688249
Plant Mol Biol. 2003 Jul;52(4):801-15
13677468
Plant Cell. 1994 Feb;6(2):163-73
7908549
Development. 1998 Jun;125(11):1979-89
9570763
Mol Biol Evol. 2006 Nov;23(11):2245-58
16926244
Development. 2002 May;129(9):2079-86
11959818
Plant Cell. 2006 Aug;18(8):1833-45
16844904
Planta. 1999 Aug 12;209(2):172-179
10436218
Plant J. 2004 Jun;38(5):861-72
15144386
Physiol Plant. 2008 Apr;132(4):526-37
18334005
Plant Physiol. 2008 Apr;146(4):1759-72
18287485
Plant J. 1999 Dec;20(6):685-93
10652140
J Exp Bot. 2007;58(14):3841-52
18037678
Cell. 1990 Dec 21;63(6):1311-22
1702033
Nature. 1998 Oct 8;395(6702):561-6
9783581
Plant Cell. 1994 Feb;6(2):175-186
12244235
Development. 1998 Jan;125(1):107-14
9389668
Plant Cell. 2003 Nov;15(11):2680-93
14576291
Development. 1997 Oct;124(19):3835-44
9367439
J Exp Bot. 2008;59(8):2253-65
18487636
Trends Plant Sci. 2005 Sep;10(9):427-35
16099195
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007 Jun;10(3):283-9
17442612
Nature. 2001 Jan 25;409(6819):525-9
11206550
Curr Biol. 1997 Aug 1;7(8):581-7
9259553
Cell. 1994 Jul 29;78(2):203-9
7913881
Plant J. 2001 May;26(4):385-94
11439126
Science. 1993 Sep 24;261(5129):1723-6
17794879
Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2001 Feb;4(1):75-85
11163172