Cinnamaldehyde and cinnamaldehyde derivatives reduce virulence in Vibrio spp. by decreasing the DNA-binding activity of the quorum sensing response regulator LuxR.
BACKGROUND
To date, only few compounds targeting the AI-2 based quorum sensing (QS) system are known. In the present study, we screened cinnamaldehyde and substituted cinnamaldehydes for their ability to interfere with AI-2 based QS. The mechanism of QS inhibition was elucidated by measuring the effect on bioluminescence in several Vibrio harveyi mutants. We also studied in vitro the ability of these compounds to interfere with biofilm formation, stress response and virulence of Vibrio spp. The compounds were also evaluated in an in vivo assay measuring the reduction of Vibrio harveyi virulence towards Artemia shrimp.


RESULTS
Our results indicate that cinnamaldehyde and several substituted derivatives interfere with AI-2 based QS without inhibiting bacterial growth. The active compounds neither interfered with the bioluminescence system as such, nor with the production of AI-2. Study of the effect in various mutants suggested that the target protein is LuxR. Mobility shift assays revealed a decreased DNA-binding ability of LuxR. The compounds were further shown to (i) inhibit biofilm formation in several Vibrio spp., (ii) result in a reduced ability to survive starvation and antibiotic treatment, (iii) reduce pigment and protease production in Vibrio anguillarum and (iv) protect gnotobiotic Artemia shrimp against virulent Vibrio harveyi BB120.


CONCLUSIONS
Cinnamaldehyde and cinnamaldehyde derivatives interfere with AI-2 based QS in various Vibrio spp. by decreasing the DNA-binding ability of LuxR. The use of these compounds resulted in several marked phenotypic changes, including reduced virulence and increased susceptibility to stress. Since inhibitors of AI-2 based quorum sensing are rare, and considering the role of AI-2 in several processes these compounds may be useful leads towards antipathogenic drugs.
Brackman
Gilles
G
Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Ghent University, Harelbekestraat 72, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium. gilles.brackman@ugent.be
Defoirdt
Tom
T
Miyamoto
Carol
C
Bossier
Peter
P
Van Calenbergh
Serge
S
Nelis
Hans
H
Coenye
Tom
T
D000171:Acrolein / Q000031:analogs & derivatives* / Q000494:pharmacology*; D000818:Animals; D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents / Q000494:pharmacology; D001156:Artemia / Q000187:drug effects / Q000382:microbiology / Q000502:physiology; D018441:Biofilms / Q000187:drug effects; D004247:DNA / Q000378:metabolism; D049449:Luminescence; D009154:Mutation; D010447:Peptide Hydrolases / Q000378:metabolism; D010860:Pigments, Biological / Q000378:metabolism; D053038:Quorum Sensing / Q000187:drug effects; D012097:Repressor Proteins / Q000378:metabolism*; D015534:Trans-Activators / Q000378:metabolism*; D014733:Vibrio / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000201:enzymology / Q000254:growth & development / Q000472:pathogenicity*; D014774:Virulence / Q000187:drug effects*
D000900:Anti-Bacterial Agents; D010860:Pigments, Biological; D012097:Repressor Proteins; D015534:Trans-Activators; C064778:LuxR autoinducer binding proteins; D000171:Acrolein; D004247:DNA; D010447:Peptide Hydrolases; C012843:cinnamaldehyde
J Dermatol. 2006 Sep;33(9):589-95
16958802
Environ Microbiol. 2001 Nov;3(11):731-6
11846763
J Appl Microbiol. 2007 Jul;103(1):194-203
17584465
J Bacteriol. 2001 Jan;183(2):758-62
11133972
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Jun;73(11):3742-6
17434996
Am Fam Physician. 2007 Aug 15;76(4):539-44
17853628
Biotechnol Bioeng. 2004 Dec 5;88(5):630-42
15470704
J Agric Food Chem. 2000 Nov;48(11):5702-9
11087542
J Microbiol Methods. 2008 Feb;72(2):157-65
18155789
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2006 Aug;43(2):119-24
16869892
Org Lett. 2004 Sep 2;6(18):3043-6
15330583
Mol Microbiol. 1993 Aug;9(4):773-86
8231809
Food Chem Toxicol. 2004 Feb;42(2):157-85
14667463
J Clin Invest. 2003 Nov;112(9):1300-7
14597754
Lett Appl Microbiol. 2006 Nov;43(5):489-94
17032221
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007 Jul;60(1):49-53
17491000
J Bacteriol. 2005 May;187(9):3214-26
15838049
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 16;96(4):1639-44
9990077
Mol Cell. 2004 Sep 10;15(5):677-87
15350213
Curr Opin Microbiol. 2005 Oct;8(5):534-42
16111914
Nature. 2007 Dec 6;450(7171):883-6
18004304
Int J Med Microbiol. 2006 Apr;296(2-3):61-71
16487746
J Bacteriol. 2002 Mar;184(6):1617-29
11872713
Cell. 2004 Jul 9;118(1):69-82
15242645
Trends Biotechnol. 2007 Oct;25(10):472-9
17719667
J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007 Feb;17(2):325-34
18051765
Mol Microbiol. 2001 Mar;39(6):1452-63
11260463
J Biol Chem. 1993 Aug 5;268(22):16706-16
8344950
Curr Opin Microbiol. 2003 Apr;6(2):191-7
12732311
J Bacteriol. 1999 Feb;181(3):899-906
9922254
Environ Microbiol. 2005 Aug;7(8):1239-47
16011761
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006 Sep;72(9):6419-23
16957276
Mol Microbiol. 1999 Jan;31(2):665-77
10027982
Environ Microbiol. 2008 Feb;10(2):328-38
18028416
J Bacteriol. 1997 Jun;179(12):4043-5
9190823
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Dec;70(12):6951-6
15574886
Mol Microbiol. 2002 Mar;43(5):1115-27
11918800
Environ Microbiol. 2007 Oct;9(10):2486-95
17803774
Microbiology (Reading). 2004 May;150(Pt 5):1283-1290
15133091
Mol Microbiol. 1994 May;12(3):403-12
8065259
Microbiology (Reading). 2003 Jul;149(Pt 7):1923-1933
12855743
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004 Jul;70(7):4193-204
15240301
Food Microbiol. 2007 Sep;24(6):664-70
17418319