title: Metabolic engineering of a thermophilic bacterium to produce ethanol at high yield.
abstract: We report engineering Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum, a thermophilic anaerobic bacterium that ferments xylan and biomass-derived sugars, to produce ethanol at high yield. Knockout of genes involved in organic acid formation (acetate kinase, phosphate acetyltransferase, and L-lactate dehydrogenase) resulted in a strain able to produce ethanol as the only detectable organic product and substantial changes in electron flow relative to the wild type. Ethanol formation in the engineered strain (ALK2) utilizes pyruvate:ferredoxin oxidoreductase with electrons transferred from ferredoxin to NAD(P), a pathway different from that in previously described microbes with a homoethanol fermentation. The homoethanologenic phenotype was stable for >150 generations in continuous culture. The growth rate of strain ALK2 was similar to the wild-type strain, with a reduction in cell yield proportional to the decreased ATP availability resulting from acetate kinase inactivation. Glucose and xylose are co-utilized and utilization of mannose and arabinose commences before glucose and xylose are exhausted. Using strain ALK2 in simultaneous hydrolysis and fermentation experiments at 50 degrees C allows a 2.5-fold reduction in cellulase loading compared with using Saccharomyces cerevisiae at 37 degrees C. The maximum ethanol titer produced by strain ALK2, 37 g/liter, is the highest reported thus far for a thermophilic anaerobe, although further improvements are desired and likely possible. Our results extend the frontier of metabolic engineering in thermophilic hosts, have the potential to significantly lower the cost of cellulosic ethanol production, and support the feasibility of further cost reductions through engineering a diversity of host organisms.
authors.affiliation: Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH 03755, USA.
authors.forename: A Joe
authors.initials: AJ
authors.lastname: Shaw
authors.forename: Kara K
authors.initials: KK
authors.lastname: Podkaminer
authors.forename: Sunil G
authors.initials: SG
authors.lastname: Desai
authors.forename: John S
authors.initials: JS
authors.lastname: Bardsley
authors.forename: Stephen R
authors.initials: SR
authors.lastname: Rogers
authors.forename: Philip G
authors.initials: PG
authors.lastname: Thorne
authors.forename: David A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Hogsett
authors.forename: Lee R
authors.initials: LR
authors.lastname: Lynd
mesh_terms: D000431:Ethanol / Q000302:isolation & purification / Q000378:metabolism*; D005285:Fermentation; D005818:Genetic Engineering; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D009154:Mutation / Q000235:genetics; D013379:Substrate Specificity; D046950:Thermoanaerobacterium / Q000235:genetics / Q000378:metabolism*; D014994:Xylose / Q000378:metabolism
chemical_list: D000431:Ethanol; D014994:Xylose
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Oct 31;103(44):16165-9
references.pmid: 17060624
references.citation: Yeast. 2004 Jun;21(8):671-84
references.pmid: 15197732
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Feb;26(2):169-72
references.pmid: 18259168
references.citation: Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2002 Sep;66(3):506-77, table of contents
references.pmid: 12209002
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 Nov;66(11):4817-21
references.pmid: 11055929
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Dec;71(12):8069-76
references.pmid: 16332787
references.citation: Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 1999;65:163-92
references.pmid: 10533435
references.citation: FEMS Yeast Res. 2005 Feb;5(4-5):399-409
references.pmid: 15691745
references.citation: Biotechnol Prog. 2005 Sep-Oct;21(5):1453-60
references.pmid: 16209550
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007 Mar;73(6):1766-71
references.pmid: 17259366
references.citation: Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2005 Oct;16(5):577-83
references.pmid: 16154338
references.citation: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007 Feb;74(2):422-32
references.pmid: 17124583
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 1988 Jun;170(6):2809-15
references.pmid: 3372483
references.citation: Science. 1995 Jan 13;267(5195):240-3
references.pmid: 17791346
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002 Apr;68(4):1914-8
references.pmid: 11916712
references.citation: J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006 Oct;33(10):834-44
references.pmid: 16680457
references.citation: J Bacteriol. 2001 May;183(10):2979-88
references.pmid: 11325924
references.citation: World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 1996 Jan;12(1):57-60
references.pmid: 24415090
references.citation: J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 1998 Feb;20(2):132-8
references.pmid: 9611822
references.citation: J Ind Microbiol. 1996 Jun;16(6):342-7
references.pmid: 8987491
references.citation: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003 Dec;63(3):258-66
references.pmid: 13680206
references.citation: Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004 Oct;65(5):600-5
references.pmid: 15007569
references.citation: Science. 2007 Feb 9;315(5813):804-7
references.pmid: 17289988
references.citation: Trends Biotechnol. 2007 Apr;25(4):153-7
references.pmid: 17320227
references.citation: Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989 Jan;55(1):203-6
references.pmid: 16347824
references.citation: Science. 2006 Jan 27;311(5760):506-8
references.pmid: 16439656