Measuring microRNAs: comparisons of microarray and quantitative PCR measurements, and of different total RNA prep methods.
BACKGROUND
Determining the expression levels of microRNAs (miRNAs) is of great interest to researchers in many areas of biology, given the significant roles these molecules play in cellular regulation. Two common methods for measuring miRNAs in a total RNA sample are microarrays and quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR). To understand the results of studies that use these two different techniques to measure miRNAs, it is important to understand how well the results of these two analysis methods correlate. Since both methods use total RNA as a starting material, it is also critical to understand how measurement of miRNAs might be affected by the particular method of total RNA preparation used.


RESULTS
We measured the expression of 470 human miRNAs in nine human tissues using Agilent microarrays, and compared these results to qPCR profiles of 61 miRNAs in the same tissues. Most expressed miRNAs (53/60) correlated well (R > 0.9) between the two methods. Using spiked-in synthetic miRNAs, we further examined the two miRNAs with the lowest correlations, and found the differences cannot be attributed to differential sensitivity of the two methods. We also tested three widely-used total RNA sample prep methods using miRNA microarrays. We found that while almost all miRNA levels correspond between the three methods, there were a few miRNAs whose levels consistently differed between the different prep techniques when measured by microarray analysis. These differences were corroborated by qPCR measurements.


CONCLUSIONS
The correlations between Agilent miRNA microarray results and qPCR results are generally excellent, as are the correlations between different total RNA prep methods. However, there are a few miRNAs whose levels do not correlate between the microarray and qPCR measurements, or between different sample prep methods. Researchers should therefore take care when comparing results obtained using different analysis or sample preparation methods.
Ach
Robert A
RA
Agilent Laboratories, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA 95051, USA. robert_ach@agilent.com
Wang
Hui
H
Curry
Bo
B
D001483:Base Sequence; D035683:MicroRNAs / Q000032:analysis* / Q000235:genetics*; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D020411:Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis / Q000379:methods*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D020133:Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction / Q000379:methods*; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D017423:Sequence Analysis, RNA / Q000379:methods*; D013048:Specimen Handling / Q000379:methods*
D035683:MicroRNAs
Trends Cell Biol. 2007 Mar;17(3):118-26
17197185
BMC Genomics. 2007 Jun 12;8:166
17565689
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Aug 10;101(32):11755-60
15284443
Nucleic Acids Res. 2004 Jan 1;32(Database issue):D109-11
14681370
Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Mar 30;33(6):e56
15800207
Dev Cell. 2006 Oct;11(4):441-50
17011485
Mol Cancer. 2006 Jun 19;5:24
16784538
BMC Biotechnol. 2006 Dec 12;6:47
17164008
Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 Nov 27;33(20):e179
16314309
Cancer Res. 2007 Jul 1;67(13):6130-5
17616669
RNA. 2007 Jan;13(1):151-9
17105992
Nature. 2004 Sep 16;431(7006):350-5
15372042
RNA. 2005 Nov;11(11):1737-44
16244135
Nat Rev Cancer. 2006 Nov;6(11):857-66
17060945
Cell. 2006 Sep 22;126(6):1203-17
16990141
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Feb 14;103(7):2257-61
16461460
Nat Genet. 2005 Jul;37(7):766-70
15965474
PLoS One. 2007 Oct 10;2(10):e1020
17925868
Science. 2007 Apr 27;316(5824):575-9
17379774
Cell. 2007 Jun 29;129(7):1401-14
17604727
Science. 2007 Dec 21;318(5858):1931-4
18048652
JAMA. 2007 May 2;297(17):1901-8
17473300
Cell. 2008 Jan 11;132(1):9-14
18191211
Trends Mol Med. 2006 Dec;12(12):580-7
17071139
Trends Genet. 2007 May;23(5):243-9
17368621
Nucleic Acids Res. 2006 Jan 1;34(Database issue):D140-4
16381832
Cell. 2007 Aug 24;130(4):581-5
17719533
Nucleic Acids Res. 2007;35(7):e52
17355992
BMC Mol Biol. 2006 Jan 31;7:3
16448564