Experimental evidence for paternal effects on offspring growth rate in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus).
Sexual selection theory predicts that females should choose males that signal viability and quality. However, few studies have found fitness benefits among females mating with highly ornamented males. Here, we use Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus), a teleost fish with no parental care, to investigate whether females could gain fitness benefits by mating with highly ornamented and large-sized males. Carotenoid-based coloration signalled by males during spawning is believed to be an indicator of good genes for this species. Paternal effects on offspring size (body length and dry body mass) were examined experimentally by crossing eggs and sperm in vitro from 12 females and 24 males in a split-brood design and raising larvae to 30 days past hatching. We clearly demonstrated that there was a relationship between offspring size and paternal coloration. However, a negative interaction between paternal length and coloration was evident for offspring length, indicating that positive effects of paternal coloration were only present for smaller males. Thus, the red spawning coloration of the male Arctic charr seems to be an indicator of good genes, but the effect of paternal coloration on offspring length, an indicator of 'offspring quality', is size dependent.
Eilertsen
Eirik Mack
EM
Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Tromsø, 9037 Tromsø, Norway.
Bårdsen
Bård-Jørgen
BJ
Liljedal
Ståle
S
Rudolfsen
Geir
G
Folstad
Ivar
I
D000818:Animals; D049628:Body Size; D005260:Female; D008297:Male; D052586:Mating Preference, Animal; D014337:Trout / Q000033:anatomy & histology / Q000254:growth & development / Q000502:physiology*
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Feb 22;272(1561):375-81
15734691
J Evol Biol. 2005 Mar;18(2):281-9
15715834
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord. 2004 Jan;28(1):39-48
14610529
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Feb 22;273(1585):485-93
16615217
J Genet. 2004 Aug;83(2):163-70
15536255
J Evol Biol. 2003 Nov;16(6):1288-95
14640420
Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol. 2002 Feb;131(2):261-9
11818247
Science. 1982 Oct 22;218(4570):384-7
7123238
J Hered. 2005 Jan-Feb;96(1):24-31
15598713
J Theor Biol. 1975 Sep;53(1):205-14
1195756
Evolution. 2004 Nov;58(11):2574-83
15612299
Oecologia. 2005 Feb;142(4):546-53
15688215
J Dairy Sci. 1993 Sep;76(9):2804-11
8227684
Proc Biol Sci. 2002 May 22;269(1495):1005-9
12028756
Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Dec 1;13(12):510-4
21238418
J Theor Biol. 1985 Jul 7;115(1):1-8
4033159
Am Nat. 2007 Jan;169 Suppl 1:S137-44
19426088
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jun 22;268(1473):1245-53
11410150
J Evol Biol. 2005 Jul;18(4):884-92
16033560
Genet Sel Evol. 2004 Nov-Dec;36(6):643-61
15496285
Am J Hum Biol. 2003 May-Jun;15(3):370-9
12704713
Proc Biol Sci. 2005 Dec 22;272(1581):2619-25
16321784
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Oct 7;271(1552):2035-42
15451693
Evolution. 2004 Nov;58(11):2452-61
15612288
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Aug 7;275(1644):1737-44
18445560
Microb Ecol. 1999 Jul;38(1):1-26
10384006
Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Oct 1;15(10):397-402
10998516
Trends Ecol Evol. 1998 Jun 1;13(6):222-7
21238275
Nature. 2000 Mar 2;404(6773):74-7
10716444
New Phytol. 2005 May;166(2):685-94
15819930
Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jan 7;268(1462):71-6
12123300
Hum Hered. 1999 Jul;49(4):183-5
10436377
Science. 1998 Jun 19;280(5371):1928-30
9632389