title: When in doubt, chimpanzees rely on estimates of past reward amounts.
abstract: Many animals can repeatedly judge the larger of two sets of food items. However, it remains unclear as to what information might accrue regarding the relative rates of return from these repeated responses. Information about overall rates of return is, in fact, unnecessary to perform well at the task itself. However, if an uncertain situation arose, such as when the quantity in one set was unknown, that information would be useful in determining whether to select a known quantity or an unknown quantity. We gave chimpanzees this test. First, they made multiple judgements between two visible food sets that varied in the number of items across trials. Then, they were faced with the same combinations of set sizes, but only one set was revealed while the other remained unknown. Rather than using a specific quantity as a threshold for choosing the known or the unknown set, the chimpanzees' choice of the unknown set varied in relation to the rate of return from responses in the first phase (when both sets were known). This indicated that the chimpanzees' decisions in the face of uncertainty were guided by a sense of how well they were rewarded overall during the session.
authors.affiliation: Language Research Center, Georgia State University, University Plaza, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA. mjberan@yahoo.com
authors.forename: Michael J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Beran
authors.forename: Theodore A
authors.initials: TA
authors.lastname: Evans
authors.forename: Emily H
authors.initials: EH
authors.lastname: Harris
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003657:Decision Making; D005260:Female; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D002679:Pan troglodytes / Q000523:psychology*; D012201:Reward; D035501:Uncertainty
references.citation: Behav Processes. 2005 Apr 29;69(1):33-43
references.pmid: 15795068
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 2008 Jul;100(3):225-33
references.pmid: 18022633
references.citation: Anim Behav. 2008 May;75(5):1793-1802
references.pmid: 19412322
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1995 Jan;21(1):82-6
references.pmid: 7844508
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2005 Mar;191(3):201-11
references.pmid: 15759141
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 2000 Jun;114(2):136-47
references.pmid: 10890585
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007 Jan;33(1):42-54
references.pmid: 17227194
references.citation: Anim Cogn. 2008 Jan;11(1):43-57
references.pmid: 17443355
references.citation: Behav Processes. 1997 Dec;41(3):227-36
references.pmid: 24896855
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2000 Jan;26(1):31-49
references.pmid: 10650542
references.citation: J Exp Child Psychol. 2006 Nov;95(3):215-29
references.pmid: 16808924
references.citation: Science. 2004 Jun 18;304(5678):1782-7
references.pmid: 15205529
references.citation: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Jan;3(1):20-9
references.pmid: 26158666
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1961 Jul;4:267-72
references.pmid: 13713775
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2004 Feb;15(2):94-9
references.pmid: 14738515
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 2004 Mar;118(1):25-36
references.pmid: 15008670
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 2007 Aug;121(3):241-9
references.pmid: 17696650
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 2006 Nov;120(4):416-26
references.pmid: 17115863
references.citation: Anim Cogn. 2008 Jul;11(3):495-503
references.pmid: 18247068
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2005 Jan;31(1):79-94
references.pmid: 15656729
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 2005 Aug;119(3):343-51
references.pmid: 16131263
references.citation: J Exp Anal Behav. 1976 Nov;26(3):487-93
references.pmid: 16811963
references.citation: J Comp Psychol. 2001 Jun;115(2):181-91
references.pmid: 11459165
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1998 Apr;24(2):215-28
references.pmid: 9556910
references.citation: Psychol Sci. 2006 May;17(5):401-6
references.pmid: 16683927
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Apr 22;267(1445):829-33
references.pmid: 10819154
references.citation: Cognition. 2006 Feb;99(1):53-71
references.pmid: 15894302