Examiner repeatability of patellar cartilage T2 values.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intra- and interexaminer resegmentation precision of patellar cartilage T2 mapping measurements in healthy subjects.


METHODS
T2-weighted images of patellar cartilage for 10 subjects were acquired. Two individuals manually segmented patellar cartilage at each slice location twice, once on each of two separate days. Bulk average and zonal T2 values for the superficial, middle, and deep layers of cartilage were calculated. The root mean square (RMS) and coefficient of variation (COV) were calculated using the repeated measurements of each slice of each subject by each examiner.


RESULTS
The intraexaminer bulk T2 differences were 0.2+/-1.0 ms, with an RMS error of 0.7 ms and a COV of 1.9%. The differences of interexaminer bulk T2 values was 1.0+/-1.4 ms, with an RMS error of 1.2 ms and a COV of 3.3%. The superficial zone of cartilage had the highest zonal variability of T2 values. The average interexaminer T2 values for the superficial, middle and deep zones were 42.2+/-5.6, 38.1+/-5.3 and 31.9+/-4.6 ms, respectively.


CONCLUSIONS
The interexaminer variability of calculated T2 values highlights the difficulty of interpreting significant differences of T2 values which are similar in magnitude. The repeatability measurements of patellar cartilage T2 values were less than reported intersession T2 repeatability.
Koff
Matthew F
MF
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55901, USA.
Parratte
Sebastien
S
Amrami
Kimberly K
KK
Kaufman
Kenton R
KR
D000328:Adult; D002358:Cartilage, Articular / Q000033:anatomy & histology*; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D008297:Male; D010329:Patella; D015203:Reproducibility of Results
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2007 Sep;19(5):451-6
17762610
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2001 Jul;9(5):393-406
11467887
Magn Reson Med. 2001 Sep;46(3):487-93
11550240
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2002 Dec;10(12):907-13
12464550
J Nucl Med. 2003 Feb;44(2):146-54
12571202
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2003 May;11(5):370-6
12744943
Radiology. 2003 Aug;228(2):493-9
12893905
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Mar;19(3):317-22
14994300
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Mar;19(3):323-8
14994301
Invest Radiol. 2004 May;39(5):288-99
15087723
Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Jun;22(5):673-82
15172061
Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
2868172
Magn Reson Med. 1986 Aug;3(4):562-74
3747818
Osteoporos Int. 1995;5(4):262-70
7492865
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1995 Sep;3 Suppl A:71-80
8581753
Radiology. 1997 Nov;205(2):546-50
9356643
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 1998 Jul;6(4):252-9
9876394
Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2004 Dec;8(4):329-53
15643573
Radiol Clin North Am. 2005 Jul;43(4):641-53, vii
15893528
Skeletal Radiol. 2005 Oct;34(10):644-8
16021447
Arthritis Rheum. 2005 Nov;52(11):3507-14
16258919
Magn Reson Med. 2006 Sep;56(3):527-34
16894587
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2006 Oct;14(10):974-83
16730462
Clin Rheumatol. 2006 Nov;25(6):778-81
16609823
NMR Biomed. 2006 Nov;19(7):822-54
17075958
Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007 Feb;15(2):198-204
16949313
Rofo. 2007 Feb;179(2):146-52
17262244