title: Health-related characteristics and preferred methods of receiving health education according to dominant language among Latinos aged 25 to 64 in a large Northern California health plan.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Latinos are a fast growing segment of the U.S. health care population. Acculturation factors, including English fluency, result in an ethnic group heterogeneous with regard to SES, health practices, and health education needs. This study examined how demographic and health-related characteristics of Spanish-dominant (SD), Bilingual (BIL), and English-dominant (ED) Latino men and women aged 25-64 differed among members of a large Northern California health plan.
  
  
  METHODS
  This observational study was based on data from cohorts of 171 SD (requiring an interpreter), 181 BIL, and 734 ED Latinos aged 25-64 who responded to random sample health plan member surveys conducted 2005-2006. Language groups were compared separately by gender on education, income, behavioral health risks (smoking, obesity, exercise frequency, dietary practices, health beliefs), health status (overall health and emotional health, diabetes, hypertension, high cholesterol, heartburn/acid reflux, back pain, depression), computer and Internet access, and health education modality preferences.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Compared with ED Latinos, higher percentages of the SD and BIL groups had very low educational attainment and low income. While groups were similar in prevalence of diabetes, hypertension, and high cholesterol, SD were less likely than ED Latinos to rate overall health and emotional well-being as good, very good, or excellent and more likely to report heartburn and back pain (women only). The groups were similar with regard to smoking and obesity, but among women, SD were more likely to be physically inactive than ED, and BIL were less likely than SD and ED groups to eat <3 servings of fruit/vegetables per day. SD and BIL of both genders were significantly less likely than ED Latinos to believe that health practices had a large impact on health. Compared to ED men and women, SD and BIL Latinos had significantly lower Internet and computer access. As a result, SD Latinos had a greater preference for lower technology health education modalities such as videos and taped phone messages.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  There are important differences among Latinos of different English language proficiency with regard to education, income, health status, health behaviors, IT access, and health education modality preferences that ought to be considered when planning and implementing health programs for this growing segment of the U.S. population.
authors.affiliation: Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Oakland, CA 94612, USA. nancy.gordon@kp.org
authors.forename: Nancy P
authors.initials: NP
authors.lastname: Gordon
authors.forename: Carlos
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Iribarren
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D002140:California; D002489:Central America / Q000208:ethnology; D003258:Consumer Behavior; D005260:Female; D015438:Health Behavior / Q000208:ethnology*; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D006266:Health Education / Q000379:methods*; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006304:Health Status; D006630:Hispanic or Latino / Q000193:education*; D006801:Humans; D020407:Internet / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D007802:Language; D008297:Male; D008800:Mexico / Q000208:ethnology; D008875:Middle Aged; D019303:Multilingualism; D012959:Socioeconomic Factors; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
references.citation: Int J Epidemiol. 2000 Jun;29(3):470-7
references.pmid: 10869319
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 2001 Aug;91(8):1254-7
references.pmid: 11499114
references.citation: J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2002 Nov;13(4):477-503
references.pmid: 12407964
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 2003 Dec;57(11):2023-34
references.pmid: 14512234
references.citation: Am J Public Health. 1989 Feb;79(2):196-8
references.pmid: 2913840
references.citation: Prev Med. 1991 Nov;20(6):751-63
references.pmid: 1766946
references.citation: J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1995;(18):73-82
references.pmid: 8562225
references.citation: Prev Med. 2005 Jun;40(6):642-51
references.pmid: 15850860
references.citation: Annu Rev Public Health. 2005;26:367-97
references.pmid: 15760294