title: Formation of simple nitriles upon glucosinolate hydrolysis affects direct and indirect defense against the specialist herbivore, Pieris rapae.
abstract: The glucosinolate-myrosinase system, found in plants of the order Brassicales, has long been considered an effective defense system against herbivores. The defensive potential of glucosinolates is mainly due to the products formed after myrosinase-catalyzed hydrolysis upon tissue damage. The most prominent hydrolysis products, the isothiocyanates, are toxic to a wide range of organisms, including herbivorous lepidopterans. In contrast, little is known about the biological activities of alternative hydrolysis products such as simple nitriles and epithionitriles that are formed at the expense of isothiocyanates in the presence of epithiospecifier proteins (ESPs). Here, we used transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana (Brassicaceae) plants overexpressing ESP (35S:ESP plants) to investigate the effects of simple nitriles on direct and indirect defense against the specialist cabbage white butterfly Pieris rapae L. (Lepidoptera, Pieridae). In the 35S:ESP plants, glucosinolates are hydrolyzed mainly to simple nitriles upon tissue disruption, while isothiocyanates are the predominant hydrolysis products in Columbia-0 (Col-0) wild-type plants. The parasitoid Cotesia rubecula (Hymenoptera, Braconidae), a specialist on P. rapae larvae, was significantly more attracted to P. rapae-infested 35S:ESP plants than to P. rapae-infested Col-0 wild-type plants in a wind tunnel setup. Furthermore, female P. rapae butterflies laid more eggs on Col-0 wild-type plants than on 35S:ESP plants when the plants had been damaged previously. However, when given a choice to feed on 35S:ESP or Col-0 plants, caterpillars did not discriminate between the two genotypes. Growth rate and developmental time were not significantly different between caterpillars that were reared on 35S:ESP or Col-0 plants. Thus, the production of simple nitriles instead of isothiocyanates, as catalyzed by ESP, can promote both direct and indirect defense against the specialist herbivore P. rapae.
authors.affiliation: Laboratory of Entomology, Wageningen University, 6700 EH, Wageningen, The Netherlands. roland.mumm@wur.nl
authors.forename: Roland
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Mumm
authors.forename: Meike
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Burow
authors.forename: Gabriella
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Bukovinszkine'kiss
authors.forename: Efthymia
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Kazantzidou
authors.forename: Ute
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Wittstock
authors.forename: Marcel
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Dicke
authors.forename: Jonathan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Gershenzon
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D017360:Arabidopsis / Q000378:metabolism*; D005260:Female; D005961:Glucosinolates / Q000378:metabolism*; D007814:Larva / Q000187:drug effects / Q000469:parasitology; D009036:Moths / Q000187:drug effects* / Q000469:parasitology; D009570:Nitriles / Q000378:metabolism*; D010058:Oviposition; D014863:Wasps / Q000502:physiology
chemical_list: D005961:Glucosinolates; D009570:Nitriles
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2007 Apr;33(4):767-79
references.pmid: 17333371
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2006 Apr;32(4):755-66
references.pmid: 16718569
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 1990 May;16(5):1649-55
references.pmid: 24263834
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Aug 20;99(17):11223-8
references.pmid: 12161563
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 1994 Feb;20(2):423-38
references.pmid: 24242065
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Apr 6;101(14):4859-64
references.pmid: 15051878
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2001 Dec;27(12):2505-16
references.pmid: 11789955
references.citation: J Evol Biol. 2006 Sep;19(5):1677-90
references.pmid: 16910997
references.citation: Plant J. 2006 May;46(4):549-62
references.pmid: 16640593
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2002 Jun;7(6):263-70
references.pmid: 12049923
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 1993 Sep;19(9):2075-9
references.pmid: 24249381
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2007 Apr;33(4):655-68
references.pmid: 17334923
references.citation: Genetics. 2002 May;161(1):325-32
references.pmid: 12019246
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2002 Jan;28(1):131-43
references.pmid: 11871395
references.citation: Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2005 Jun;8(3):264-71
references.pmid: 15860423
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 1994 Jul;20(7):1725-34
references.pmid: 24242665
references.citation: FEBS J. 2006 Jun;273(11):2432-46
references.pmid: 16704417
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2006 Jun;18(6):1524-36
references.pmid: 16679459
references.citation: FEBS Lett. 2000 Feb 25;468(2-3):243-6
references.pmid: 10692595
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2007 Sep 22;274(1623):2271-7
references.pmid: 17623639
references.citation: Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Jan 7;267(1438):89-95
references.pmid: 10670958
references.citation: Plant Mol Biol. 2000 Jan;42(1):93-113
references.pmid: 10688132
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 1994 May;20(5):1025-37
references.pmid: 24242300
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2001 Oct;27(10):1911-28
references.pmid: 11710601
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 18;104(51):20427-31
references.pmid: 18077380
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2008 Mar;146(3):916-26
references.pmid: 18192443
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 1994 Jul;20(7):1735-48
references.pmid: 24242666
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2006 Nov;32(11):2333-49
references.pmid: 17061170
references.citation: IUBMB Life. 2007 Dec;59(12):744-51
references.pmid: 18085474
references.citation: Ecology. 2008 Jun;89(6):1616-26
references.pmid: 18589526
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2003 Jun;29(6):1403-15
references.pmid: 12918924
references.citation: FEBS Lett. 2000 Feb 11;467(2-3):296-8
references.pmid: 10675557
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 1992 Jun;18(6):863-73
references.pmid: 24254090
references.citation: Trends Plant Sci. 2006 Feb;11(2):89-100
references.pmid: 16406306
references.citation: Phytochemistry. 2006 Nov;67(22):2450-62
references.pmid: 17049571
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2007 Oct;33(10):1831-44
references.pmid: 17828429
references.citation: Phytochemistry. 2001 Jan;56(1):5-51
references.pmid: 11198818
references.citation: Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2003 Apr;14(2):169-76
references.pmid: 12732318
references.citation: Plant Cell. 2001 Dec;13(12):2793-807
references.pmid: 11752388
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2005 Jun;138(2):1149-62
references.pmid: 15923339
references.citation: Chembiochem. 2006 Dec;7(12):1982-9
references.pmid: 17086559
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 1995 Nov;21(11):1789-811
references.pmid: 24233830
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 2002 Sep;28(9):1749-62
references.pmid: 12449503
references.citation: Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2006;57:303-33
references.pmid: 16669764
references.citation: J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2005 Feb;191(2):147-55
references.pmid: 15711970
references.citation: J Chem Ecol. 1993 Aug;19(8):1645-63
references.pmid: 24249231
references.citation: Plant J. 2007 Mar;49(6):1008-19
references.pmid: 17257166