The impact of prejudice screening procedures on racial bias in the courtroom.
The current study examines the impact of the challenge for cause procedure and its effectiveness in curbing racial prejudice in trials involving Black defendants. Participants were provided with a trial summary of a defendant charged with either drug trafficking or embezzlement. The race of the defendant was either White or Black, with participants in the Black defendant condition receiving (prior to the trial presentation) either no challenge, a close-ended standard challenge, or a modified reflective pretrial questioning strategy. Overall, the results revealed an anti-Black bias in judgments. While the closed ended challenge did little to reduce this bias, the reflective format demonstrated a reduction in racial bias. Theoretical and applied implications of these findings are discussed.
Schuller
Regina A
RA
Department of Psychology, York University, 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. schuller@yorku.ca
Kazoleas
Veronica
V
Kawakami
Kerry
K
D000293:Adolescent; D002170:Canada; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D007600:Judgment; D008297:Male; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence* / Q000592:standards*; D011287:Prejudice; D055815:Young Adult