title: Development of input connections in neural cultures.
abstract: We introduce an approach for the quantitative assessment of the connectivity in neuronal cultures, based on the statistical mechanics of percolation on a graph. This allows us to monitor the development of the culture and to see the emergence of connectivity in the network. The culture becomes fully connected at a time equivalent to the expected time of birth. The spontaneous bursting activity that characterizes cultures develops in parallel with the connectivity. The average number of inputs per neuron can be quantitatively determined in units of m(0), the number of activated inputs needed to excite the neuron. For m(0) approximately 15 we find that hippocampal neurons have on average approximately 60-120 inputs, whereas cortical neurons have approximately 75-150, depending on neuronal density. The ratio of excitatory to inhibitory neurons is determined by using the GABA(A) antagonist bicuculine. This ratio changes during development and reaches the final value at day 7-8, coinciding with the expected time of the GABA switch. For hippocampal cultures the inhibitory cells comprise approximately 30% of the neurons in the culture whereas for cortical cultures they are approximately 20%. Such detailed global information on the connectivity of networks in neuronal cultures is at present inaccessible by any electrophysiological or other technique.
authors.affiliation: Department of Physics of Complex Systems, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot 76100, Israel.
authors.forename: Jordi
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Soriano
authors.forename: María
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Rodríguez Martínez
authors.forename: Tsvi
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Tlusty
authors.forename: Elisha
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Moses
mesh_terms: D002478:Cells, Cultured; D004594:Electrophysiology; D006624:Hippocampus / Q000166:cytology / Q000187:drug effects; D009415:Nerve Net / Q000166:cytology* / Q000187:drug effects; D046509:Tissue Culture Techniques
references.citation: Cell. 2001 May 18;105(4):521-32
references.pmid: 11371348
references.citation: J Neurosci. 1996 Oct 15;16(20):6424-32
references.pmid: 8815921
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Apr 26;26(17):4526-34
references.pmid: 16641232
references.citation: Phys Rev Lett. 2006 Nov 3;97(18):188102
references.pmid: 17155581
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2002 Apr;87(4):1799-804
references.pmid: 11929901
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Jan;3(1):34-42
references.pmid: 11823803
references.citation: BMC Neurosci. 2006 Feb 07;7:11
references.pmid: 16464257
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 1982 Sep 20;210(3):278-90
references.pmid: 7142443
references.citation: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jul 19;102(29):10333-8
references.pmid: 16006530
references.citation: Q Rev Biophys. 2002 Feb;35(1):63-87
references.pmid: 11997981
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006 Jun;7(6):449-63
references.pmid: 16715054
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2001 Nov;4 Suppl:1207-14
references.pmid: 11687831
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 2001 Jun;24(6):353-60
references.pmid: 11356508
references.citation: Neural Comput. 1998 May 15;10(4):837-54
references.pmid: 9573408
references.citation: Methods. 2003 May;30(1):94-105
references.pmid: 12695107
references.citation: Trends Neurosci. 2005 Jun;28(6):278-83
references.pmid: 15927682
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002 Sep;3(9):728-39
references.pmid: 12209121
references.citation: J Neurosci. 2006 Aug 16;26(33):8465-76
references.pmid: 16914671
references.citation: J Comp Neurol. 1980 Mar 1;190(1):87-114
references.pmid: 7381056
references.citation: Cereb Cortex. 1992 Jul-Aug;2(4):295-309
references.pmid: 1330121
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2007 Apr;97(4):2937-48
references.pmid: 17287439
references.citation: Science. 2006 Dec 15;314(5806):1788-92
references.pmid: 17170309