Hospital characteristics associated with highly automated and usable clinical information systems in Texas, United States.
BACKGROUND
A hospital's clinical information system may require a specific environment in which to flourish. This environment is not yet well defined. We examined whether specific hospital characteristics are associated with highly automated and usable clinical information systems.


METHODS
This was a cross-sectional survey of 125 urban hospitals in Texas, United States using the Clinical Information Technology Assessment Tool (CITAT), which measures a hospital's level of automation based on physician interactions with the information system. Physician responses were used to calculate a series of CITAT scores: automation and usability scores, four automation sub-domain scores, and an overall clinical information technology (CIT) score. A multivariable regression analysis was used to examine the relation between hospital characteristics and CITAT scores.


RESULTS
We received a sufficient number of physician responses at 69 hospitals (55% response rate). Teaching hospitals, hospitals with higher IT operating expenses (>$1 million annually), IT capital expenses (>$75,000 annually) and hospitals with larger IT staff (> or = 10 full-time staff) had higher automation scores than hospitals that did not meet these criteria (p < 0.05 in all cases). These findings held after adjustment for bed size, total margin, and ownership (p < 0.05 in all cases). There were few significant associations between the hospital characteristics tested in this study and usability scores.


CONCLUSIONS
Academic affiliation and larger IT operating, capital, and staff budgets are associated with more highly automated clinical information systems.
Amarasingham
Ruben
R
Department of Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center and Parkland Health & Hospital System, Dallas, USA. ramara@parknet.pmh.org
Diener-West
Marie
M
Plantinga
Laura
L
Cunningham
Aaron C
AC
Gaskin
Darrell J
DJ
Powe
Neil R
NR
D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D020000:Decision Support Systems, Clinical / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006751:Hospital Information Systems / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006786:Hospitals, Urban / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D016347:Medical Records Systems, Computerized / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D013673:Technology Assessment, Biomedical; D013781:Texas
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 May-Jun;11(3):207-16
14764612
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2007 May-Jun;14(3):288-94
17329726
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2006 Jan 05;6:1
16396679
Methods Inf Med. 2003;42(4):297-301
14534625
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004 Mar-Apr;11(2):104-12
14633936
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005 Jan-Feb;12(1):8-12
15492027
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997 Mar-Apr;4(2):112-24
9067877
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 May-Jun;10(3):235-43
12626373
JAMA. 2005 Mar 9;293(10):1261-3
15755949
Ann Intern Med. 2006 May 16;144(10):742-52
16702590
Med Care. 2006 Mar;44(3):216-24
16501392
Int J Med Inform. 2001 Dec;64(2-3):143-56
11734382
Health Aff (Millwood). 2006 Nov-Dec;25(6):w496-507
17035341
N Engl J Med. 2003 Mar 6;348(10):881-2
12621131
N Engl J Med. 2003 Jun 19;348(25):2526-34
12815139
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1997 Mar-Apr;4(2):102-11
9067876
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2002 Oct 23;2:7
12396233
BMJ. 1998 Apr 18;316(7139):1236-8
9553006
Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Jul-Aug;20(4):159-68
11463072