title: Retention of induced mutations in a Drosophila reverse-genetic resource.
abstract: Targeting induced local lesions in genomes (TILLING) is a reverse-genetic method for identifying point mutations in chemically mutagenized populations. For functional genomics, it is ideal to have a stable collection of heavily mutagenized lines that can be screened over an extended period of time. However, long-term storage is impractical for Drosophila, so mutant strains must be maintained by continual propagation of live cultures. Here we evaluate a strategy in which ethylmethane sulfonate (EMS) mutagenized chromosomes were maintained as heterozygotes with balancer chromosomes for >100 generations before screening. The strategy yielded a spectrum of point mutations similar to those found in previous studies of EMS-induced mutations, as well as 2.4% indels (insertions and deletions). Our analysis of 1887 point mutations in 148 targets showed evidence for selection against deleterious lesions and differential retention of lesions among targets on the basis of their position relative to balancer breakpoints, leading to a broad distribution of mutational densities. Despite selection and differential retention, the success of a user-funded service based on screening a large collection several years after mutagenesis indicates sufficient stability for use as a long-term reverse-genetic resource. Our study has implications for the use of balancer chromosomes to maintain mutant lines and provides the first large-scale quantitative assessment of the limitations of using breeding populations for repositories of genetic variability.
authors.affiliation: Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109, USA.
authors.forename: Jennifer L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Cooper
authors.forename: Elizabeth A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: Greene
authors.forename: Bradley J
authors.initials: BJ
authors.lastname: Till
authors.forename: Christine A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Codomo
authors.forename: Barbara T
authors.initials: BT
authors.lastname: Wakimoto
authors.forename: Steven
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Henikoff
mesh_terms: D000483:Alleles; D000818:Animals; D002875:Chromosomes; D003433:Crosses, Genetic; D004252:DNA Mutational Analysis; D004331:Drosophila melanogaster / Q000235:genetics*; D005020:Ethyl Methanesulfonate / Q000737:chemistry; D017344:Genes, Insect / Q000187:drug effects; D005821:Genetic Techniques; D014644:Genetic Variation; D006579:Heterozygote; D008957:Models, Genetic; D016296:Mutagenesis; D009153:Mutagens; D009154:Mutation
chemical_list: D009153:Mutagens; D005020:Ethyl Methanesulfonate
references.citation: Methods Mol Biol. 2003;236:205-20
references.pmid: 14501067
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Jul 12;448(7150):151-6
references.pmid: 17625558
references.citation: Nature. 2007 Jan 4;445(7123):82-5
references.pmid: 17203060
references.citation: Genetics. 2004 May;167(1):207-16
references.pmid: 15166148
references.citation: Genome Res. 2007 May;17(5):649-58
references.pmid: 17416746
references.citation: Nat Rev Genet. 2006 Jul;7(7):524-36
references.pmid: 16755288
references.citation: Nucleic Acids Res. 2005 May 13;33(9):2806-12
references.pmid: 15894797
references.citation: Genetics. 2000 Nov;156(3):1169-73
references.pmid: 11063692
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2000 Apr;18(4):455-7
references.pmid: 10748531
references.citation: Genetics. 2007 Aug;176(4):2151-63
references.pmid: 17565942
references.citation: Methods Cell Biol. 2004;77:91-112
references.pmid: 15602907
references.citation: Genetics. 1999 Dec;153(4):1825-38
references.pmid: 10581288
references.citation: Biol Reprod. 2008 Jan;78(1):2-12
references.pmid: 17901073
references.citation: PLoS Genet. 2005 Nov;1(5):e67
references.pmid: 16299588
references.citation: Genetics. 2004 May;167(1):203-6
references.pmid: 15166147
references.citation: Genome Res. 2005 May;15(5):718-23
references.pmid: 15867432
references.citation: Plant J. 2006 Feb;45(4):684-94
references.pmid: 16441355
references.citation: BMC Plant Biol. 2008 Jan 24;8:9
references.pmid: 18218134
references.citation: Nat Biotechnol. 2005 Jan;23(1):75-81
references.pmid: 15580263
references.citation: Methods Mol Biol. 2006;351:51-8
references.pmid: 16988425
references.citation: Genome Biol. 2007;8 Suppl 1:S9
references.pmid: 18047701
references.citation: Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2006 Dec;16(6):545-52
references.pmid: 17055251
references.citation: Genetics. 2003 Jun;164(2):731-40
references.pmid: 12807792
references.citation: Nature. 1990 May 10;345(6271):170-2
references.pmid: 2110627
references.citation: BMC Plant Biol. 2007 Apr 11;7:19
references.pmid: 17428339
references.citation: Genomics. 2004 Feb;83(2):332-4
references.pmid: 14706462
references.citation: Plant Physiol. 2000 Jun;123(2):439-42
references.pmid: 10859174
references.citation: Genome Res. 2003 Mar;13(3):524-30
references.pmid: 12618384