title: The context of temporal processing is represented in the multidimensional relationships between timing tasks.
abstract: In the present study we determined the performance interrelations of ten different tasks that involved the processing of temporal intervals in the subsecond range, using multidimensional analyses. Twenty human subjects executed the following explicit timing tasks: interval categorization and discrimination (perceptual tasks), and single and multiple interval tapping (production tasks). In addition, the subjects performed a continuous circle-drawing task that has been considered an implicit timing paradigm, since time is an emergent property of the produced spatial trajectory. All tasks could be also classified as single or multiple interval paradigms. Auditory or visual markers were used to define the intervals. Performance variability, a measure that reflects the temporal and non-temporal processes for each task, was used to construct a dissimilarity matrix that quantifies the distances between pairs of tasks. Hierarchical clustering and multidimensional scaling were carried out on the dissimilarity matrix, and the results showed a prominent segregation of explicit and implicit timing tasks, and a clear grouping between single and multiple interval paradigms. In contrast, other variables such as the marker modality were not as crucial to explain the performance between tasks. Thus, using this methodology we revealed a probable functional arrangement of neural systems engaged during different timing behaviors.
authors.affiliation: Instituto de Neurobiología, UNAM, Querétaro, México. merchant@inb.unam.mx
authors.forename: Hugo
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Merchant
authors.forename: Wilbert
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Zarco
authors.forename: Ramon
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Bartolo
authors.forename: Luis
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Prado
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001519:Behavior; D016000:Cluster Analysis; D004193:Discrimination Learning; D004192:Discrimination, Psychological; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009048:Motor Skills; D011597:Psychomotor Performance; D011930:Reaction Time; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D013997:Time Factors; D013998:Time Perception; D014796:Visual Perception
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Oct;28(5):1085-99
references.pmid: 12421057
references.citation: Q J Exp Psychol B. 1998 May;51(2):97-120
references.pmid: 9621837
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2003 Apr;13(2):250-5
references.pmid: 12744981
references.citation: Brain Cogn. 2000 Mar;42(2):183-200
references.pmid: 10744919
references.citation: Annu Rev Neurosci. 1997;20:25-42
references.pmid: 9056706
references.citation: Exp Brain Res. 2008 Jan;184(2):233-48
references.pmid: 17828600
references.citation: Science. 2003 May 30;300(5624):1437-9
references.pmid: 12775842
references.citation: J Mot Behav. 2005 Sep;37(5):395-403
references.pmid: 16120566
references.citation: Neuron. 2001 Sep 27;31(6):889-901
references.pmid: 11580891
references.citation: Psychol Res. 2004 Dec;69(1-2):115-23
references.pmid: 14758474
references.citation: Nat Rev Neurosci. 2005 Oct;6(10):755-65
references.pmid: 16163383
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 1989 Apr;45(4):291-6
references.pmid: 2710629
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 2008 Jul;12(7):273-80
references.pmid: 18539519
references.citation: Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1997 Apr;7(2):170-84
references.pmid: 9142762
references.citation: Acta Psychol (Amst). 1985 Dec;60(2-3):173-91
references.pmid: 4091033
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2002 Jun;28(3):575-88
references.pmid: 12075889
references.citation: Nat Neurosci. 2001 Mar;4(3):317-23
references.pmid: 11224550
references.citation: Psychol Bull. 2001 Jan;127(1):22-44
references.pmid: 11271754
references.citation: J Mot Behav. 2003 Dec;35(4):371-81
references.pmid: 14607774
references.citation: Trends Cogn Sci. 1997 Aug;1(5):163-9
references.pmid: 21223897
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1999 Oct;25(5):1316-30
references.pmid: 10531665
references.citation: Rev Neurosci. 1999;10(2):91-116
references.pmid: 10658954
references.citation: Percept Psychophys. 2001 Oct;63(7):1214-28
references.pmid: 11766945
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2006 Jan;95(1):1-13
references.pmid: 16339504
references.citation: J Exp Psychol. 1959 Apr;57(4):243-48
references.pmid: 13641599
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2008 Feb;99(2):939-49
references.pmid: 18094101
references.citation: J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1995 Feb;21(1):3-18
references.pmid: 7707031
references.citation: Science. 1980 Oct 24;210(4468):390-8
references.pmid: 17837406
references.citation: Prog Brain Res. 2004;143:507-11
references.pmid: 14653192
references.citation: Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002 Dec;978:302-17
references.pmid: 12582062
references.citation: J Neurophysiol. 2003 Aug;90(2):675-82
references.pmid: 12904489