Damage to the fronto-polar cortex is associated with impaired multitasking.
BACKGROUND
A major question in understanding the functional organization of the brain is to delineate the functional divisions of the prefrontal cortex. Of particular importance to the cognitive capacities that are uniquely human is the fronto-polar cortex (Brodmann's area 10), which is disproportionally larger in humans relative to the rest of the brain than it is in the ape's brain. The specific function of this brain region remains poorly understood, but recent neuroimaging studies have proposed that it may hold goals in mind while exploring and processing secondary goals.


RESULTS
Here we show that the extent of damage to the fronto-polar cortex predicts impairment in the management of multiple goals. This result reveals that the integrity of the fronto-polar cortex is necessary to perform tasks that require subjects to maintain a primary goal in mind while processing secondary goals, an ability which is crucial for complex human cognitive abilities.


CONCLUSIONS
These results provide important new insights concerning the cerebral basis of complex human cognition such as planning and multitasking.
Dreher
Jean-Claude
JC
Cognitive Neuroscience Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorder and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America. dreher@isc.cnrs.fr
Koechlin
Etienne
E
Tierney
Michael
M
Grafman
Jordan
J
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001921:Brain / Q000033:anatomy & histology* / Q000473:pathology; D001930:Brain Injuries / Q000503:physiopathology; D001931:Brain Mapping; D016022:Case-Control Studies; D002540:Cerebral Cortex; D003071:Cognition; D003072:Cognition Disorders / Q000503:physiopathology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008568:Memory; D008875:Middle Aged; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004 Mar;5(3):184-94
14976518
Nature. 1999 May 13;399(6732):148-51
10335843
Science. 2000 Jun 2;288(5471):1656-60
10834847
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Feb 16;96(4):1794-9
9990104
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003 Feb;4(2):139-47
12563285
Neuropsychologia. 2003;41(8):906-18
12667527
Neuron. 2002 Jul 18;35(2):371-81
12160754
Am J Phys Anthropol. 2001 Mar;114(3):224-41
11241188
J Cogn Neurosci. 2002 Nov 15;14(8):1184-99
12495525
Cogn Psychol. 1997 Jun;33(1):43-63
9212721
Neuropsychologia. 2000;38(6):848-63
10689059
Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2002 Feb;34(1):6-18
12060992
Psychol Res. 2006 Nov;70(6):514-25
16175414
Neuropsychologia. 2001;39(6):545-55
11257280
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Oct 29;99(22):14595-600
12391312
Brain Res. 2006 Jun 22;1096(1):125-37
16750818
Neuroimage. 2002 Sep;17(1):95-109
12482070
Cereb Cortex. 2003 Apr;13(4):329-39
12631562
Nature. 2006 Jun 15;441(7095):876-9
16778890
Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Jun;11(6):229-35
17475536
Neuroimage. 2001 Nov;14(5):1136-49
11697945
Behav Neurosci. 2003 Dec;117(6):1161-8
14674837
Nat Neurosci. 2002 Mar;5(3):272-6
11850633
Cereb Cortex. 2006 Mar;16(3):394-404
15917482
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Mar 15;91(6):2012-5
8134341
Trends Neurosci. 2000 Oct;23(10):475-83
11006464
Nat Neurosci. 2000 Jan;3(1):85-90
10607400
Science. 2003 Nov 14;302(5648):1181-5
14615530
Cereb Cortex. 2002 Sep;12(9):908-14
12183390
Neuroimage. 2002 Mar;15(3):523-36
11848695
Cereb Cortex. 2001 Sep;11(9):796-805
11532885
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 3;95(3):891-8
9448256