Association between patients' recommendation of their GP and their evaluation of the GP.
OBJECTIVE
Patient priorities and patient evaluations indicate that accessibility should receive more attention to increase quality in general practice. The definition of family medicine emphasizes the patient-centred approach, communication skills, continuity, and clinical skills. We aimed to explore the associations between the 23 items in the Europep questionnaire measuring patient evaluation of general practice and the patients' recommendation of their general practitioner (GP) to friends and to study the relationship of these items with the core competences of family medicine.


METHODS
Cross-sectional study where patients aged 18 years and over attending the practice were included. Patients completed the Danish version of the 23 item Europep questionnaire and an additional item about the degree to which they could recommend their GP to friends.


METHODS
Danish general practice (the DanPEP study).


METHODS
A total of 50 191 patients and 690 GPs were included in the analyses.


METHODS
For each item, associations were calculated between a positive answer and the degree to which the patient could recommend the GP. Analyses were made at patient and GP levels.


RESULTS
We found 12 items that covered the 10 most strongly associated items from both analyses: four of six items from the "doctor-patient relationship", two of five items from "medical care", and all items from "information and support" and "organization of services". No items from "accessibility" were among the 12 items.


CONCLUSIONS
Recommending the GP to others was most strongly associated with the "emphatic", "patient-oriented", "informative and coordinating", and "competent/skilled" GP and to a lesser degree with accessibility to general practice.
Vedsted
Peter
P
The Research Unit for General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Aarhus, Denmark. p.vedsted@alm.au.dk
Heje
Hanne N
HN
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002983:Clinical Competence; D003718:Denmark; D004645:Empathy; D005194:Family Practice / Q000458:organization & administration / Q000592:standards*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D010817:Physician-Patient Relations; D010821:Physicians, Family / Q000592:standards*; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires
Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Sep;54(506):651-2
15353048
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2007 Mar;25(1):27-32
17354156
Br J Gen Pract. 2002 Jun;52(479):526-7
12051237
Ugeskr Laeger. 2007 Jun 18;169(25):2403-8
17594828
Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Dec;11(4):315-9
12468690
Int J Qual Health Care. 2002 Apr;14(2):111-8
11954680
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2006 Dec;24(4):218-23
17118861
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2008;26(3):174-80
18759161
Fam Pract. 2002 Aug;19(4):339-43
12110551
Qual Health Care. 2001 Jun;10(2):90-5
11389317
Fam Pract. 1994 Dec;11(4):468-78
7895978
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2004 Dec;22(4):193-4
15765631
Int J Qual Health Care. 2006 Jun;18(3):232-7
16766604
Fam Pract. 2003 Dec;20(6):623-7
14701883
Fam Pract. 2000 Oct;17(5):372-9
11021894
Fam Pract. 1999 Feb;16(1):4-11
10321388
Br J Gen Pract. 2000 Nov;50(460):882-7
11141874
Soc Sci Med. 1998 Nov;47(10):1573-88
9823053
BMJ. 2003 Jun 14;326(7402):1310
12805168
BMJ. 2003 Apr 19;326(7394):877-9
12702627