title: The mental health system in Brazil: Policies and future challenges.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The aim of this paper is to assess the mental health system in Brazil in relation to the human resources and the services available to the population.
  
  
  METHODS
  The World Health Organization Assessment Instrument for Mental Health Systems (WHO AIMS) was recently applied in Brazil. This paper will analyse data on the following sections of the WHO-AIMS: a) mental health services; and b) human resources. In addition, two more national datasets will be used to complete the information provided by the WHO questionnaire: a) the Executive Bureau of the Department of Health (Datasus); and b) the National Register of Health Institutions (CNS).
  
  
  RESULTS
  There are 6003 psychiatrists, 18,763 psychologists, 1985 social workers, 3119 nurses and 3589 occupational therapists working for the Unified Health System (SUS). At primary care level, there are 104,789 doctors, 184, 437 nurses and nurse technicians and 210,887 health agents.The number of psychiatrists is roughly 5 per 100,000 inhabitants in the Southeast region, and the Northeast region has less than 1 psychiatrist per 100,000 inhabitants. The number of psychiatric nurses is insufficient in all geographical areas, and psychologists outnumber other mental health professionals in all regions of the country. The rate of beds in psychiatric hospitals in the country is 27.17 beds per 100,000 inhabitants. The rate of patients in psychiatric hospitals is 119 per 100,000 inhabitants. The average length of stay in mental hospitals is 65.29 days. In June 2006, there were 848 Community Psychosocial Centers (CAPS) registered in Brazil, a ratio of 0.9 CAPS per 200,000 inhabitants, unequally distributed in the different geographical areas: the Northeast and the North regions having lower figures than the South and Southeast regions.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The country has opted for innovative services and programs, such as the expansion of Psychosocial Community Centers and the Return Home program to deinstitutionalize long-stay patients. However, services are unequally distributed across the regions of the country, and the growth of the elderly population, combined with an existing treatment gap is increasing the burden on mental health care. This gap may get even wider if funding does not increase and mental health services are not expanded in the country. There is not yet a good degree of integration between primary care and the mental health teams working at CAPS level, and it is necessary to train professionals to act as mental health planners and as managers. Research on service organization, policy and mental health systems evaluation are strongly recommended in the country. There are no firm data to show the impact of such policies in terms of community service cost-effectiveness and no tangible indicators to assess the results of these policies.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, Brazil. mdmateus@gmail.com
authors.forename: Mario D
authors.initials: MD
authors.lastname: Mateus
authors.forename: Jair J
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Mari
authors.forename: Pedro Gg
authors.initials: PG
authors.lastname: Delgado
authors.forename: Naomar
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Almeida-Filho
authors.forename: Thomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Barrett
authors.forename: Jeronimo
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Gerolin
authors.forename: Samuel
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Goihman
authors.forename: Denise
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Razzouk
authors.forename: Jorge
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Rodriguez
authors.forename: Renata
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Weber
authors.forename: Sergio B
authors.initials: SB
authors.lastname: Andreoli
authors.forename: Shekhar
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Saxena
references.citation: Rev Saude Publica. 1996 Aug;30(4):304-9
references.pmid: 9201891
references.citation: Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):139-40
references.pmid: 12676430
references.citation: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2001 May;36(5):256-9
references.pmid: 11515704
references.citation: Soc Sci Med. 1999 Dec;49(11):1461-71
references.pmid: 10515629
references.citation: Rev Saude Publica. 2006 Apr;40(2):304-9
references.pmid: 16583042
references.citation: Lancet. 2007 Sep 22;370(9592):1061-77
references.pmid: 17804052
references.citation: Health Policy Plan. 2006 May;21(3):157-70
references.pmid: 16522714
references.citation: Lancet. 2007 Oct 6;370(9594):1241-52
references.pmid: 17804059
references.citation: Bull World Health Organ. 2004 Nov;82(11):858-66
references.pmid: 15640922
references.citation: Lancet. 2007 Sep 15;370(9591):991-1005
references.pmid: 17804058
references.citation: Psychol Med. 2007 Oct;37(10):1514-6
references.pmid: 18293511
references.citation: Lancet. 2007 Sep 8;370(9590):806
references.pmid: 17804065
references.citation: Rev Saude Publica. 2007 Feb;41(1):124-30
references.pmid: 17273643
references.citation: Br J Psychiatry. 2003 Dec;183:477-8
references.pmid: 14645015
references.citation: J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2002 Jun;9(3):251-3
references.pmid: 12060367
references.citation: Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1992 May;27(3):147-50
references.pmid: 1621140
references.citation: Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2008 Mar;21(2):109-13
references.pmid: 18332652