Directly assessing the relationship between irrelevant speech and irrelevant tapping.
The acoustic confusion effect is the finding that lists of to-be-remembered items that sound similar to one another are recalled worse than otherwise comparable lists of items that sound different. Previous work has shown that concurrent irrelevant speech and concurrent irrelevant tapping both reduce the size of this effect, suggesting similarities between the two manipulations. The authors assessed the relation between irrelevant speech and irrelevant tapping by correlating the disruption each causes to recall of similar- and dissimilar-sounding items. A significant correlation was obtained, indicating a relation between the two. The results indicate that researchers should be sensitive to changes in the magnitude of the effects rather than focusing exclusively on the presence or absence of particular effects. Implications for the 3 major explanations of the irrelevant speech effect are discussed.
Surprenant
Aimée M
AM
Department of Psychology, Memorial University of Newfoundland, Newfoundland, Canada. asurpren@mun.ca
Neath
Ian
I
Bireta
Tamra J
TJ
Allbritton
David W
DW
D000162:Acoustics; D001288:Attention; D006801:Humans; D008568:Memory; D011939:Mental Recall; D010700:Phonetics; D013060:Speech