Use of ultrasonography in ulnar nerve entrapment surgery--a prospective study.
The purpose of our study is to assess the usefulness of high-resolution ultrasonography in observing the morphology and dynamics of the ulnar nerve in the cubital tunnel and also the efficacy of ultrasonography in a more accurate diagnosis and appropriate surgical treatment decision. Cross-sectional area of the ulnar nerves of 40 healthy volunteers in the control group were measured bilaterally at the level of the epicondyle, 2 cm proximal to and 2 cm distal to the epicondyle. Measurements were obtained for elbows both in extension and flexion. Then, we prospectively obtained the cross-sectional area values of 18 patients at the same levels, elbows in extension and flexion position, and compared the data obtained from the patient group and the control group. The differences between the cross-sectional areas of the ulnar nerves in extension and flexion were statistically significant in the patient population (p < 0.001). Mean cross-sectional area of the ulnar nerve in the patient population was calculated as 0.16 cm(2), and we accepted the cut-off point as 0.1 cm(2). This value for cross-sectional area yielded a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 100% in diagnosis of ulnar nerve entrapment. Results substantiated conspicuous morphological changes in ulnar nerve during flexion and extension of the elbow. We also observed that as the degree of the nerve displacement by virtue of elbow flexion that is discerned by ultrasonography increased, a more aggressive decompressive surgery was needed for an appropriate treatment.
Kutlay
Murat
M
Department of Neurosurgery, GATA Haydarpasa Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
Colak
Ahmet
A
Simşek
Hakan
H
Oztürk
Ersin
E
Senol
Mehmet Güney
MG
Topuz
Kivanç
K
Demircan
Mehmet Nusret
MN
D000328:Adult; D019412:Anatomy, Cross-Sectional; D004550:Elbow / Q000503:physiopathology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011446:Prospective Studies; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D014459:Ulnar Nerve / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000503:physiopathology; D017769:Ulnar Nerve Compression Syndromes / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000503:physiopathology / Q000601:surgery*; D014463:Ultrasonography / Q000592:standards; D055815:Young Adult
Br J Radiol. 1986 Oct;59(706):1041-3
3533199
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1985 Nov;145(5):989-93
3901711
J Hand Surg Br. 1986 Jun;11(2):175-81
3734552
Muscle Nerve. 2002 Dec;26(6):798-803
12451604
J Hand Surg Br. 2000 Oct;25(5):499-502
10991822
Radiology. 1988 Apr;167(1):179-82
3279453
Radiology. 2001 Sep;220(3):601-5
11526255
Muscle Nerve. 2004 Aug;30(2):202-8
15266636
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992 Oct;159(4):793-8
1529845
J Hand Surg Br. 2000 Feb;25(1):85-9
10763732
Neurosurgery. 1990 Nov;27(5):709-14; discussion 714
2259400
Neurology. 2004 Mar 9;62(5):767-73
15007128
Neurology. 2004 Nov 9;63(9):1675-80
15534254
Muscle Nerve. 2003 Jan;27(1):26-33
12508291
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 Mar;80(3):357-9
10084451
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Jun;85(6):1000-5
15179657
Lab Invest. 1986 Jul;55(1):91-100
3724067
Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2007 Mar;47(3):109-15; discussion 115
17384492
J Hand Surg Br. 2000 Oct;25(5):503-4
10991823