CTPA for the diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism during pregnancy.
CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) has been suggested by the Fleischner society as the first test following a negative leg ultrasound in pregnant patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. This editorial discusses the use of CTPA as a diagnostic tool in pregnant women and comments on the need for specifically adapting CT protocols during pregnancy in the light of new research describing a substantial number of non-diagnostic examinations in pregnant women if routine scanning protocols are used for CTA of the pulmonary arteries. Potential reasons for these high numbers of insufficient examinations are physiological changes occurring during pregnancy that lead to a hyperdynamic circulation, which reduces average enhancement of the pulmonary vasculature. In addition, there are possible breathing-related effects that include an increased risk for Valsalva manoeuvre with devastating effects for pulmonary vascular enhancement. Techniques to overcome these problems are discussed: bolus triggering with short start delays, high flow rates or high contrast medium concentration, preferential use of fast CT systems and the use of low kVp CT techniques. CT data acquisition during deep inspiration should be avoided and shallow respiration may be considered as an alternative to suspended breathing in this patient group. All these factors can contribute to optimization of the quality of pulmonary CTA in pregnant patients. It is time now to adapt our protocols and provide optimum care for this sensitive patient group.
Schaefer-Prokop
Cornelia
C
Prokop
Mathias
M
D000208:Acute Disease; D000792:Angiography / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D011247:Pregnancy; D011249:Pregnancy Complications, Cardiovascular / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D011651:Pulmonary Artery / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D011655:Pulmonary Embolism / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods*
Respir Med. 2006 Oct;100(10):1682-7
16549345
Radiology. 2008 Feb;246(2):643; author reply 643-4
18227556
Eur Radiol. 2008 Dec;18(12):2716-22
18651147
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Dec;181(6):1495-8
14627562
Radiology. 2007 Dec;245(3):742-50
17923509
BMJ. 2005 Aug 6;331(7512):350
16081454
Radiology. 2007 Nov;245(2):315-29
17848685
J Thromb Haemost. 2004 Oct;2(10):1857-8
15456507
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 Mar 19;100(6):428-36
18334707
Ann ICRP. 2000;30(1):iii-viii, 1-43
11108925
Br J Radiol. 2006 May;79(941):441-4
16632627
Radiology. 2005 Jul;236(1):369-70; author reply 370
15987987
Eur Radiol. 2008 Dec;18(12):2709-15
18651151
Radiology. 2006 Dec;241(3):899-907
17114631
Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1994 Dec;49(12 Suppl):S1-14
7877788
Eur Radiol. 2007 May;17(5):1310-9
17115164
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Dec;18(6):627-40
14635147
JAMA. 2005 Apr 27;293(16):2012-7
15855435
Radiology. 1998 Jun;207(3):657-62
9609887
Radiology. 1998 Apr;207(1):201-6
9530317
Eur Radiol. 2005 Jun;15(6):1234-40
15609057
Am J Physiol. 1989 Apr;256(4 Pt 2):H1060-5
2705548
Arch Intern Med. 2002 May 27;162(10):1170-5
12020189
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Mar;170(3):849-56
8141215