title: A detailed cost and efficiency analysis of performing carpal tunnel surgery in the main operating room versus the ambulatory setting in Canada.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Our goals were to analyze cost and efficiency of performing carpal tunnel release (CTR) in the main operating room (OR) versus the ambulatory setting, and to document the venue of carpal tunnel surgery practices by plastic surgeons in Canada.
  
  
  METHODS
  A detailed analysis of the salaries of nonphysician personnel and materials involved in CTR performed in these settings was tabulated. Hospital statistical records were used to calculate our efficiency analysis. A survey of practicing plastic surgeons in Canada documented the venue of CTR performed by most.
  
  
  RESULTS
  In a 3-h surgical block, we are able to perform nine CTRs in the ambulatory setting versus four in the main OR. The cost of CTR in the ambulatory setting is $36/case and $137/case in the main OR in the same hospital. Only 18% of Canadian respondents use the main OR exclusively for CTR, whereas 63% use it for some of their cases. The ambulatory setting is used exclusively by 37%, whereas 69% use it for greater than 95% of their cases. The majority of CTR cases (>95%) are done without an anesthesia provider by 73% of surgeons. Forty-three percent use epinephrine routinely with local anesthesia and 43% avoid the use of a tourniquet for at least some cases by using epinephrine for hemostasis.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The use of the main OR for CTR is almost four times as expensive, and less than half as efficient as in an ambulatory setting. In spite of this, many surgeons in Canada continue to use the more expensive, less efficient venue of the main OR for CTR.
authors.affiliation: Department of Plastic Surgery, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada.
authors.forename: Martin R
authors.initials: MR
authors.lastname: Leblanc
authors.forename: Janice
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Lalonde
authors.forename: Donald H
authors.initials: DH
authors.lastname: Lalonde
references.citation: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2007 Jan;119(1):260-266
references.pmid: 17255681
references.citation: J Hand Surg Br. 1993 Apr;18(2):184-6
references.pmid: 8501369
references.citation: J Hand Surg Am. 1987 May;12(3):384-91
references.pmid: 3584886
references.citation: Orthopedics. 1996 Jul;19(7):589-90
references.pmid: 8823816
references.citation: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004 Oct;114(5):1137-46
references.pmid: 15457025
references.citation: J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993 Nov;75(11):1585-92
references.pmid: 8245050
references.citation: J Hand Surg Am. 2005 Sep;30(5):1061-7
references.pmid: 16182068
references.citation: J Hand Surg Am. 1979 Nov;4(6):544-6
references.pmid: 512313