Biliary peritonitis caused by a leaking T-tube fistula disconnected at the point of contact with the anterior abdominal wall: a case report.
BACKGROUND
Operations on the common bile duct may lead to potentially serious complications such as biliary peritonitis. T-tube insertion is performed to reduce the risk of this occurring postoperatively. Biliary leakage at the point of insertion into the common bile duct, or along the fistula, can sometimes occur after T-tube removal and this has been reported extensively in the literature. We report a case where the site at which the T-tube fistula leaked proved to be the point of contact between the fistula and the anterior abdominal wall, a previously unreported complication.


METHODS
A 36-year-old sub-Saharan African woman presented with gallstone-induced pancreatitis and, once her symptoms settled, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed, common bile duct stones were removed and a T-tube was inserted. Three weeks later, T-tube removal led to biliary peritonitis due to the disconnection of the T-tube fistula which was recannulated laparoscopically using a Latex drain.


CONCLUSIONS
This case highlights a previously unreported mechanism for bile leak following T-tube removal caused by detachment of a fistula tract at its contact point with the anterior abdominal wall. Hepatobiliary surgeons should be aware of this mechanism of biliary leakage and the use of laparoscopy to recannulate the fistula.
Nikolić
Marko
M
Department of General Surgery, Hinchingbrooke Hospital NHS Trust, Hinchingbrooke Park, Huntingdon, UK. mzn@cantab.net
Karthikesalingam
Alan
A
Nachimuthu
Senthil
S
Tang
Tjun Y
TY
Harris
Adrian M
AM
Res Exp Med (Berl). 1997;197(1):53-61
9226763
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;(1):CD005640
17253565
ANZ J Surg. 2002 Mar;72(3):177-80
12071447
N Z Med J. 2005 Jun 24;118(1217):U1522
15980899
Acta Chir Belg. 2005 Apr;105(2):210-2
15906918
Am J Surg. 2005 Sep;190(3):430-3
16105531
Lancet. 1965 Apr 17;1(7390):843-4
14263542
J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1998 Nov-Dec;9(6):986-90
9840046
Br J Surg. 1976 Jun;63(6):440-5
1276671