title: Cross-boundary coordination on forested landscapes: investigating alternatives for implementation.
abstract: Cross-boundary coordination is a tool for ecosystem management whereby landowners voluntarily coordinate management practices toward economic and/or ecological landscape-scale outcomes (e.g., fiber, invasive species control, habitat). Past research indicates that it may be particularly applicable on landscapes that include small forest landholdings. To explore alternatives by which coordination might occur, we conducted seven focus groups with landowners (n=51) who actively manage their forests in southwest Wisconsin and northeast Iowa. Focus group participants were presented with three hypothetical alternatives to coordinate with their neighbors; landowners could self-organize, work with a natural resource professional (i.e., forester), or work with an organization to complete a cross-boundary practice. In this article, we focus on the latter two alternatives and the role of two social theories--principal-agent and cooperation--in explaining landowners' evaluations of these alternatives. Key findings are that (1) cross-boundary coordination has the potential to alleviate problems between landowners and resource professionals inherent to their typical working relationship, and (2) social relationships are a major factor contributing to landowners' willingness to participate. We posit that cross-boundary coordination offers a non-economic incentive for landowners to work together as it may reduce the uncertainty associated with hiring a resource professional. At the same time, professionals can provide a bridging function among landowners who are unacquainted. To achieve these outcomes and expand the adoption of cross-boundary coordination, we suggest four guidelines. First, foster dialogue among landowners toward shared cognition and oversight. Second, match landowners' practices and objectives such that there are clear benefits to all. Third, develop relationships through low risk activities where possible. Fourth, do not expect on-going commitments.
authors.affiliation: Division of Forestry, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, PO Box 7921, Madison, WI 53707, USA.
authors.forename: Rebecca J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Gass
authors.forename: Mark
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Rickenbach
authors.forename: Lisa A
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Schulte
authors.forename: Kimberly
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Zeuli
mesh_terms: D003247:Conservation of Natural Resources / Q000379:methods*; D017753:Ecosystem; D005260:Female; D017144:Focus Groups; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D007484:Iowa; D008297:Male; D017149:Private Sector; D014197:Trees; D014922:Wisconsin
references.citation: Environ Manage. 2002 Oct;30(4):584-94
references.pmid: 12481924
references.citation: Environ Manage. 2004 Jul;34(1):75-90
references.pmid: 15383875
references.citation: Annu Rev Psychol. 2006;57:375-400
references.pmid: 16318600
references.citation: Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007 Feb;33(2):187-99
references.pmid: 17259580