Cellular phosphatases facilitate combinatorial processing of receptor-activated signals.
BACKGROUND
Although reciprocal regulation of protein phosphorylation represents a key aspect of signal transduction, a larger perspective on how these various interactions integrate to contribute towards signal processing is presently unclear. For example, a key unanswered question is that of how phosphatase-mediated regulation of phosphorylation at the individual nodes of the signaling network translates into modulation of the net signal output and, thereby, the cellular phenotypic response.


RESULTS
To address the above question we, in the present study, examined the dynamics of signaling from the B cell antigen receptor (BCR) under conditions where individual cellular phosphatases were selectively depleted by siRNA. Results from such experiments revealed a highly enmeshed structure for the signaling network where each signaling node was linked to multiple phosphatases on the one hand, and each phosphatase to several nodes on the other. This resulted in a configuration where individual signaling intermediates could be influenced by a spectrum of regulatory phosphatases, but with the composition of the spectrum differing from one intermediate to another. Consequently, each node differentially experienced perturbations in phosphatase activity, yielding a unique fingerprint of nodal signals characteristic to that perturbation. This heterogeneity in nodal experiences, to a given perturbation, led to combinatorial manipulation of the corresponding signaling axes for the downstream transcription factors.


CONCLUSIONS
Our cumulative results reveal that it is the tight integration of phosphatases into the signaling network that provides the plasticity by which perturbation-specific information can be transmitted in the form of a multivariate output to the downstream transcription factor network. This output in turn specifies a context-defined response, when translated into the resulting gene expression profile.
Kumar
Dhiraj
D
Immunology Group, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi, 110067, India. dhirajkrverma@gmail.com
Dua
Raina
R
Srikanth
Ravichandran
R
Jayaswal
Shilpi
S
Siddiqui
Zaved
Z
Rao
Kanury V S
KV
Science. 2002 Aug 9;297(5583):1018-23
12169734
Mol Syst Biol. 2007;3:150
18059445
Cell Calcium. 2007 Aug;42(2):145-56
17572487
Physiol Rev. 2004 Jan;84(1):1-39
14715909
Science. 2005 Dec 9;310(5754):1646-53
16339439
J Immunol. 2003 Jun 1;170(11):5630-5
12759443
J Theor Biol. 2004 Sep 7;230(1):119-32
15276005
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Nov;7(11):820-8
17057752
J Biol Chem. 1999 Oct 22;274(43):30353-6
10521409
FEBS J. 2005 Jan;272(1):244-58
15634347
Immunity. 2006 Nov;25(5):701-15
17098202
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2006 Nov;7(11):813-9
17006434
J Biol Chem. 1995 Jul 14;270(28):16483-6
7622446
J Cell Sci. 2006 Nov 15;119(Pt 22):4607-15
17093265
EMBO J. 2006 Feb 22;25(4):811-21
16437157
J Clin Invest. 2002 Jan;109(1):9-14
11781344
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1997 Apr;9(2):240-6
9069263
Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 1998;27:133-64
9646865
Mol Cell. 2002 May;9(5):957-70
12049733
J Endocrinol. 2005 Apr;185(1):19-33
15817824