Multiple deleterious effects of experimentally aged sperm in a monogamous bird.
Sperm aging is known to be detrimental to reproductive performance. However, this apparently general phenomenon has seldom been studied in an evolutionary context. The negative impact of sperm aging on parental fitness should constitute a strong selective pressure for adaptations to avoid its effects. We studied the impact of sperm aging on black-legged kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla), a monogamous seabird. Kittiwakes comprise a model system because (i) of evidence that females eject their mates' sperm to prevent fertilization by sperm that would be old and degraded by the time of fertilization and result in reduced reproductive performance and (ii) the lack of extra-pair fertilization in this species makes cryptic female choice an unlikely explanation of postcopulatory sperm ejection by females. We experimentally manipulated the age of the sperm fertilizing kittiwake eggs by fitting males with anti-insemination rings for variable periods of time preceding egg-laying. We found evidence that sperm aging negatively affected four sequential stages of reproduction: fertilization potential, rate of embryonic development, embryonic mortality, and chick condition at hatching. These results may be produced by a continuum of a single process of sperm aging that differentially affects various aspects of development, depending on the degree of damage incurred to the spermatozoa. The marked impact of sperm age on female fitness may thus drive postcopulatory sperm ejection by females. These results provide experimental evidence of deleterious effects of sperm aging on a nondomestic vertebrate, underlining its taxonomic generality and its potential to select for a wide array of adaptations.
White
Joël
J
Laboratoire de Fonctionnement et Evolution des Systèmes Ecologiques, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 75005 Paris, France.
Wagner
Richard H
RH
Helfenstein
Fabrice
F
Hatch
Scott A
SA
Mulard
Hervé
H
Naves
Liliana C
LC
Danchin
Etienne
E
D000818:Animals; D016922:Cellular Senescence / Q000502:physiology*; D046091:Charadriiformes / Q000502:physiology*; D004625:Embryo, Nonmammalian / Q000196:embryology; D005260:Female; D007314:Insemination / Q000502:physiology; D008297:Male; D010063:Ovum / Q000502:physiology; D011336:Probability; D013094:Spermatozoa / Q000502:physiology*
Reprod Fertil Dev. 1997;9(3):321-31
9261880
Hum Reprod. 1998 Jun;13(6):1429-36
9688366
Mol Reprod Dev. 2003 Nov;66(3):314-23
14502611
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 May 7;271 Suppl 4:S134-7
15252964
Nature. 2000 Jun 15;405(6788):787-9
10866198
J Exp Zool. 1999 Nov 1;284(6):696-704
10531556
Biol Reprod. 1971 Dec;5(3):252-7
5163518
Hum Reprod Update. 2000 Nov-Dec;6(6):532-49
11129687
Gamete Res. 1988 May;20(1):53-65
3235028
Acta Physiol Scand. 1985 Jun;124(2):189-94
3925723
Nature. 2004 Apr 29;428(6986):939-41
15118726
Evolution. 1990 Nov;44(7):1780-1786
28567813
Am Nat. 2005 Jun;165(6):718-23
15937751
J Reprod Fertil. 1987 Jul;80(2):493-8
3656281
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Apr 16;99(8):5466-70
11943862
Biol Reprod Suppl. 1970;2:1-13
12254591
Proc Biol Sci. 2004 Jun 22;271(1545):1311-8
15306356
Gamete Res. 1987 Jan;16(1):47-56
3506899
Hum Reprod. 1991 May;6(5):703-8
1939553
Nature. 1995 Jan 19;373(6511):241-4
7816137
Curr Biol. 2004 Jul 13;14(13):R511-3
15242631
N Engl J Med. 1968 May 2;278(18):993-9
4868716
Science. 2007 Apr 20;316(5823):383-4
17446381
Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Sep;14(9):336-337
10441305
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1976;14(2):98-104
10214