title: Heterogeneity of endoscopy negative heartburn: epidemiology and natural history.
abstract: It has now become clear that only about 40% or less of patients with heartburn and/or regurgitation have esophagitis, and that the majority of them lack visible distal esophageal mucosa breaks. These subjects are referred to as non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD) patients. It has been estimated that in the Western world at least one tenth of the general population has at least weekly heartburn. This proportion seems to be lower in Asia, while prevalence is rapidly increasing. Although it would be extremely useful to have prospective information regarding the fate of such patients, the natural history of NERD is largely unknown, and very few studies in the literature have addressed this issue. These studies are for the greater part old, not well conducted, and suffer from methodological drawbacks including ill-defined entry criteria. However, a review of these studies indicates that a consistent minority of NERD patients may develop erosive disease at an approximate rate of about 10% per year.
authors.forename: Fabio
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Pace
authors.forename: Valentina
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Casini
authors.forename: Stefano
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Pallotta
mesh_terms: D004942:Esophagitis, Peptic / Q000209:etiology / Q000473:pathology; D004945:Esophagoscopy; D004947:Esophagus / Q000473:pathology; D005764:Gastroesophageal Reflux / Q000453:epidemiology / Q000209:etiology / Q000473:pathology; D006356:Heartburn / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000209:etiology / Q000473:pathology; D006801:Humans
references.citation: Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Aug;101(8):1900-20; quiz 1943
references.pmid: 16928254
references.citation: Scand J Gastroenterol. 1998 Oct;33(10):1016-22
references.pmid: 9829353
references.citation: Gut. 2008 Oct;57(10):1354-9
references.pmid: 18424568
references.citation: J Gastroenterol. 2006 May;41(5):440-3
references.pmid: 16799885
references.citation: Scand J Gastroenterol. 2005 Mar;40(3):275-85
references.pmid: 15932168
references.citation: Gut. 2005 May;54(5):710-7
references.pmid: 15831922
references.citation: Dig Liver Dis. 2001 Oct;33(7):523-7
references.pmid: 11816537
references.citation: Gut. 1991 Aug;32(8):845-8
references.pmid: 1885063
references.citation: Am J Gastroenterol. 2001 Feb;96(2):303-14
references.pmid: 11232668
references.citation: Am J Gastroenterol. 2006 Nov;101(11):2457-62
references.pmid: 17029609
references.citation: Gastroenterology. 2006 Apr;130(5):1459-65
references.pmid: 16678559
references.citation: Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. 1996;221:14-7
references.pmid: 9110390
references.citation: Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998 Feb;10(2):119-24
references.pmid: 9581986
references.citation: Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Jul 1;24(1):33-45
references.pmid: 16803601
references.citation: Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2004 Feb;19 Suppl 1:28-34
references.pmid: 14725576
references.citation: Dig Liver Dis. 2004 Feb;36(2):111-5
references.pmid: 15002817
references.citation: Gut. 1992 Aug;33(8):1016-9
references.pmid: 1356887
references.citation: Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2002 Dec;31(4 Suppl):S59-66
references.pmid: 12489471
references.citation: Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Jan;92(1):37-41
references.pmid: 8995934