title: Cost analysis of long-term treatment of patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with esomeprazole on-demand treatment or esomeprazole continuous treatment: an open, randomized, multicenter study in Switzerland.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To assess the difference in direct medical costs between on-demand (OD) treatment with esomeprazole (E) 20 mg and continuous (C) treatment with E 20 mg q.d. from a clinical practice view in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms.
  
  
  METHODS
  This open, randomized study (ONE: on-demand Nexium evaluation) compared two long-term management options with E 20 mg in endoscopically uninvestigated patients seeking primary care for GERD symptoms who demonstrated complete relief of symptoms after an initial treatment of 4 weeks with E 40 mg. Data on consumed quantities of all cost items were collected in the study, while data on prices during the time of study were collected separately. The analysis was done from a societal perspective.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Forty-nine percent (484 of 991) of patients randomized to the OD regimen and 46% (420 of 913) of the patients in the C group had at least one contact with the investigator that would have occurred nonprotocol-driven. The difference of the adjusted mean direct medical costs between the treatment groups was CHF 88.72 (95% confidence interval: CHF 41.34-153.95) in favor of the OD treatment strategy (Wilcoxon rank-sum test: P < 0.0001). Adjusted direct nonmedical costs and productivity loss were similar in both groups.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The adjusted direct medical costs of a 6-month OD treatment with esomeprazole 20 mg in uninvestigated patients with symptoms of GERD were significantly lower compared with a continuous treatment with E 20 mg once a day. The OD therapy represents a cost-saving alternative to the continuous treatment strategy with E.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medical Economics, Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. Thomas.Szucs@ifspm.uzh.ch
authors.forename: Thomas
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Szucs
authors.forename: Christina
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Thalmann
authors.forename: Pierre
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Michetti
authors.forename: Christoph
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Beglinger
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D000897:Anti-Ulcer Agents / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000191:economics* / Q000627:therapeutic use; D016001:Confidence Intervals; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D064098:Esomeprazole / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000191:economics* / Q000627:therapeutic use; D005260:Female; D005764:Gastroesophageal Reflux / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000191:economics; D006295:Health Resources / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006760:Hospitalization / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D015995:Prevalence; D054328:Proton Pump Inhibitors / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000191:economics* / Q000627:therapeutic use; D013557:Switzerland; D013997:Time Factors; D055815:Young Adult
chemical_list: D000897:Anti-Ulcer Agents; D054328:Proton Pump Inhibitors; D064098:Esomeprazole