Hemodynamic changes after visual stimulation and breath holding provide evidence for an uncoupling of cerebral blood flow and volume from oxygen metabolism.
Functional neuroimaging is most commonly performed using the blood-oxygenation-level-dependent (BOLD) approach, which is sensitive to changes in cerebral blood flow (CBF), cerebral blood volume (CBV), and the cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen (CMRO(2)). However, the precise mechanism by which neuronal activity elicits a hemodynamic response remains controversial. Here, visual stimulation (14 secs flashing checkerboard) and breath-hold (4 secs exhale+14 secs breath hold) experiments were performed in alternating sequence on healthy volunteers using BOLD, CBV-weighted, and CBF-weighted fMRI. After visual stimulation, the BOLD signal persisted for 33+/-5 secs (n=9) and was biphasic with a negative component (undershoot), whereas CBV and CBF returned to baseline without an undershoot at 20+/-5 and 20+/-3 secs, respectively. After breath hold, the BOLD signal returned to baseline (23+/-7 secs) at the same time (P>0.05) as CBV (21+/-6 secs) and CBF (18+/-3 secs), without a poststimulus undershoot. These data suggest that the BOLD undershoot after visual activation reflects a persistent increase in CMRO(2). These observations support the view that CBV and CBF responses elicited by neuronal activation are not necessarily coupled to local tissue metabolism.
Donahue
Manus J
MJ
Division of MR Research, The Russell H Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA.
Stevens
Robert D
RD
de Boorder
Michiel
M
Pekar
James J
JJ
Hendrikse
Jeroen
J
van Zijl
Peter C M
PC
D001921:Brain / Q000378:metabolism*; D002560:Cerebrovascular Circulation; D005260:Female; D006439:Hemodynamics; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D010101:Oxygen Consumption; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D012119:Respiration
Magn Reson Med. 1998 Jun;39(6):855-64
9621908
Magn Reson Med. 2006 Dec;56(6):1261-73
17075857
J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999 Mar;9(3):454-61
10194717
Med Image Anal. 2001 Jun;5(2):143-56
11516708
J Trauma. 1995 Sep;39(3):463-71; discussion 471-2
7473910
NMR Biomed. 2006 Dec;19(8):1043-54
16948114
J Neurophysiol. 1984 May;51(5):1109-20
6610024
Neuroimage. 2008 Apr 1;40(2):473-481
18201912
Neuroimage. 2006 Apr 1;30(2):349-58
16257236
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2004 Jul;24(7):764-70
15241184
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Dec;87(24):9868-72
2124706
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2006 May;26(5):634-44
16222242
Magn Reson Med. 2003 Aug;50(2):263-74
12876702
Biophys J. 1993 Mar;64(3):803-12
8386018
Neuroimage. 2004;23 Suppl 1:S220-33
15501093
Magn Reson Med. 2005 Apr;53(4):808-16
15799063
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2001 Oct;21(10):1133-45
11598490
Trends Neurosci. 2002 Dec;25(12):621-5
12446129
Neuroimage. 2002 Jun;16(2):283-94
12030817
Magn Reson Med. 1994 Dec;32(6):749-63
7869897
Stroke. 1974 Sep-Oct;5(5):630-9
4472361
Magn Reson Med. 1998 Apr;39(4):615-24
9543424
Neuroimage. 2008 Mar 1;40(1):59-67
18249010
Magn Reson Med. 2006 Sep;56(3):546-52
16894581
Magn Reson Med. 1996 Feb;35(2):143-8
8622575
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2006;2006:25-8
17946773
Nat Med. 1998 Feb;4(2):159-67
9461188
Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 Oct;24(8):993-9
16997068
Magn Reson Med. 2008 Feb;59(2):308-15
18228581
Neuroimage. 2007 Mar;35(1):89-104
17222567
Brain. 1990 Feb;113 ( Pt 1):27-47
2302536
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jun 5;98(12):6859-64
11381119
J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1999 Jun;19(6):679-89
10366199