Strategies and applications for incorporating physical and chemical signal gradients in tissue engineering.
From embryonic development to wound repair, concentration gradients of bioactive signaling molecules guide tissue formation and regeneration. Moreover, gradients in cellular and extracellular architecture as well as in mechanical properties are readily apparent in native tissues. Perhaps tissue engineers can take a cue from nature in attempting to regenerate tissues by incorporating gradients into engineering design strategies. Indeed, gradient-based approaches are an emerging trend in tissue engineering, standing in contrast to traditional approaches of homogeneous delivery of cells and/or growth factors using isotropic scaffolds. Gradients in tissue engineering lie at the intersection of three major paradigms in the field-biomimetic, interfacial, and functional tissue engineering-by combining physical (via biomaterial design) and chemical (with growth/differentiation factors and cell adhesion molecules) signal delivery to achieve a continuous transition in both structure and function. This review consolidates several key methodologies to generate gradients, some of which have never been employed in a tissue engineering application, and discusses strategies for incorporating these methods into tissue engineering and implant design. A key finding of this review was that two-dimensional physicochemical gradient substrates, which serve as excellent high-throughput screening tools for optimizing desired biomaterial properties, can be enhanced in the future by transitioning from two dimensions to three dimensions, which would enable studies of cell-protein-biomaterial interactions in a more native tissue-like environment. In addition, biomimetic tissue regeneration via combined delivery of graded physical and chemical signals appears to be a promising strategy for the regeneration of heterogeneous tissues and tissue interfaces. In the future, in vivo applications will shed more light on the performance of gradient-based mechanical integrity and signal delivery strategies compared to traditional tissue engineering approaches.
Singh
Milind
M
Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045-7609, USA.
Berkland
Cory
C
Detamore
Michael S
MS
D001672:Biocompatible Materials; D001704:Biopolymers; D002448:Cell Adhesion; D002454:Cell Differentiation; D002455:Cell Division; D002516:Ceramics; D002633:Chemotaxis; D047108:Embryonic Development; D004867:Equipment Design; D006801:Humans; D036341:Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins / Q000502:physiology; D016062:Porosity; D019736:Prostheses and Implants; D012038:Regeneration; D013499:Surface Properties; D023822:Tissue Engineering / Q000379:methods*; D014945:Wound Healing
D001672:Biocompatible Materials; D001704:Biopolymers; D036341:Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins