title: Comparison of anthracycline-based combination chemotherapy with or without all-trans retinoic acid in acute promyelocytic leukemia.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare survival in Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL) patients treated with or without All-Trans Retinoic Acid (ATRA).
  
  
  METHODS
  Longitudinal, comparative study.
  
  
  METHODS
  The Armed Forces Bone Marrow Transplant Centre (AFBMTC), Rawalpindi, Pakistan from May 2001 to April 2007.
  
  
  METHODS
  All consecutive newly diagnosed patients of acute promyelocytic leukemia, treated at Armed Forces Bone Marrow Transplant Centre, Rawalpindi, Pakistan, between May 2001 and April 2007, were included and given chemotherapy according to availability of ATRA. Diagnosis was confirmed on morphology/ karyotyping/ molecular analysis. Eligibility criteria included confirmed morphologic diagnosis and/or by demonstration of t(15;17) and/or PML/RAR proportional to re-arrangement, no prior chemotherapy, normal hepatic and renal function, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 - 2 and no contraindications to ATRA (history of sensitivity to Vit. A or other retinoids). All patients having history of cardiac failure (LVEF < 50) and arrhythmias, ECOG performance status 3 and 4, relapse / refractory disease, ALT twice normal values, serum creatinine > 150 micromol/L and pregnancy were excluded from this study. Survival was calculated from the date of chemotherapy to death or last follow-up according to Kaplan-Meier and Cox (Proportional hazard) regression analysis methods.
  
  
  RESULTS
  During the 6 years study period, 31 newly diagnosed patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia received treatment at AFBMTC. Seventeen patients received anthracycline-based remission induction and consolidation chemotherapy, while 14 received ATRA-based remission induction, consolidation and by two years maintenance therapy. Overall Survival (OS), Disease Free Survival (DFS) and mortality were 29.4%, 29.4% and 70.6% respectively in 17 patients who received anthracycline based chemotherapy, whereas in patients who received ATRA-based chemotherapy OS, DFS and mortality was 71.4%, 64.2% and 28.6% respectively. Major causes of mortality were septicemia and chemotherapy related toxicity.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Response to ATRA-based chemotherapy in patient cohort was better as compared with anthracycline based chemotherapy (71.4% vs. 29.4%) in terms of survival and mortality.
authors.affiliation: Department of Haematology, Armed Forces Bone Marrow Transplant Centre, Rawalpindi.
authors.forename: Shahid
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Raza
authors.forename: Khalil
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Ullah
authors.forename: Parvez
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Ahmed
authors.forename: Badshah
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Khan
mesh_terms: D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D018943:Anthracyclines / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D000970:Antineoplastic Agents / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D004359:Drug Therapy, Combination; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D015473:Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute / Q000188:drug therapy* / Q000401:mortality; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D013534:Survival; D014212:Tretinoin / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D055815:Young Adult
chemical_list: D018943:Anthracyclines; D000970:Antineoplastic Agents; D014212:Tretinoin