The Michael-Adler report (1933): criminology under the microscope.
This paper details the responses made by social scientists as well as criminal justice practitioners during 1932 to a study focusing on the status of criminology by the Bureau of Social Hygiene. These responses ultimately led to the publication of the controversial Crime, Law and Social Science (1933), which gave much-needed direction to the development of criminology. Despite the importance of these responses to the creation of criminological thought, only one (by Edwin H. Sutherland) has previously been published. Examining the responses of all of the individual participants in the project gives a clearer picture of controversies and changes which ultimately occurred as the field of criminology gradually became institutionalized as an academic discipline.
Goff
Colin
C
University of Winnipeg, Canada. c.goff@uwinnipeg.ca
Geis
Gilbert
G
D001877:Books / Q000266:history*; D003415:Crime / Q000266:history; D003418:Criminology / Q000266:history*; D005257:Fellowships and Scholarships / Q000266:history; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006801:Humans; D010684:Philosophy / Q000266:history; D011643:Publishing / Q000266:history; D012106:Research / Q000266:history; D012935:Social Justice / Q000266:history*; D012942:Social Sciences / Q000266:history; D012961:Sociology / Q000266:history