title: What leads to better health care innovation? Arguments for an integrated policy-oriented research agenda.
abstract: This essay is based on the recognition that the current 'downstream' health services research and policy approach to innovation misses the mark on one crucial point. It has not addressed how to promote the design of innovations that are likely to be more valuable than others. Re-visiting the ways in which health services research could inform innovation processes, this paper suggests that three attributes make innovations especially compelling from a health care system perspective: relevance; usability; and sustainability. These could be used as a starting point for outlining a policy-oriented research agenda that could bridge upstream design processes, and downstream needs and priorities. Given the pace at which innovations come about and the complexity of health care systems, we believe that both research and policy should be able to contribute significantly to the shaping of socially valuable technological change in health care. Recognizing that such a long-term goal cannot be reached through a linear, rationalistic process, our paper offers preliminary arguments to start to reconcile the health policy and innovation agendas.
authors.affiliation: Department of Health Administration, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada.
authors.forename: Pascale
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Lehoux
authors.forename: Bryn
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Williams-Jones
authors.forename: Fiona
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Miller
authors.forename: David
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Urbach
authors.forename: Stephanie
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Tailliez
mesh_terms: D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D006302:Health Services Research; D006801:Humans; D011050:Policy Making