Teleradiology interpretations of emergency department computed tomography scans.
BACKGROUND
Teleradiologist interpretation of radiographic studies during after-hours Emergency Department (ED) care has the potential to influence patient management.


OBJECTIVE
We sought to characterize frequencies of discrepancies between teleradiology and in-house radiology interpretations for computed tomography (CT) scans.


METHODS
We conducted a prospective observational study comparing teleradiologist and in-house radiologist interpretations of CT scans obtained between 7:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. from the ED at a Level I trauma center. For each scan, discrepancies were characterized as major, minor, or no discrepancy. Follow-up data were used to characterize major discrepancies.


RESULTS
Of 787 studies sent to teleradiology, 550 were scans of the head, cervical spine, chest, or abdomen and pelvis. Major discrepancies were identified in 32 of 550 studies (5.8%; 95% confidence interval 4.1%-8.1%), including 7 of 160 head CT scans, 1 of 29 cervical spine CT scans, 3 of 64 chest CT scans, and 21 of 297 abdominopelvic CT scans. We attributed 8 of the 32 major discrepancies to a teleradiology misinterpretation, with one case leading to an adverse event.


CONCLUSIONS
We identified major discrepancies due to teleradiologist misinterpretation in 8 of 550 studies, with one patient suffering an adverse event. Our findings support the cautious use of teleradiology interpretations.
Platts-Mills
Timothy F
TF
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco-Fresno, Fresno, California, USA.
Hendey
Gregory W
GW
Ferguson
Brian
B
D004632:Emergency Medical Services / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000592:standards*; D019112:Teleradiology / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000592:standards* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data