title: "A fool for a client?" Mental illness and the right of self-representation.
abstract: Does the Constitution require a trial court to allow an obviously impaired man to represent himself? This column discusses the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in Indiana v. Edwards, which allows states to limit a defendant's right to self-representation when the individual lacks the mental capacity to conduct a trial defense unless represented. Previous cases bearing on the decision are discussed, including Dusky v. U.S. in 1960, which set the standard for competence to stand trial; Faretta v. California in 1975, which established the right of criminal defendants to represent themselves; and Godinez v. Moran in 1993, which upheld the Dusky standard for trial-related competence.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY 10032, USA. psa21@columbia.edu
authors.forename: Paul S
authors.initials: PS
authors.lastname: Appelbaum
mesh_terms: D003657:Decision Making; D006801:Humans; D033241:Lawyers; D016743:Mental Competency; D001523:Mental Disorders; D020377:Self Efficacy; D014481:United States