Large head metal-on-metal cementless total hip arthroplasty versus 28 mm metal-on-polyethylene cementless total hip arthroplasty: design of a randomized controlled trial.
BACKGROUND
Osteoarthritis of the hip is successfully treated by total hip arthroplasty with metal-on-polyethylene articulation. Polyethylene wear debris can however lead to osteolysis, aseptic loosening and failure of the implant. Large head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty may overcome polyethylene wear induced prosthetic failure, but can increase systemic cobalt and chromium ion concentrations. The objective of this study is to compare two cementless total hip arthroplasties: a conventional 28 mm metal-on-polyethylene articulation and a large head metal-on-metal articulation. We hypothesize that the latter arthroplasties show less bone density loss and higher serum metal ion concentrations. We expect equal functional scores, greater range of motion, fewer dislocations, fewer periprosthetic radiolucencies and increased prosthetic survival with the metal-on-metal articulation.


METHODS
A randomized controlled trial will be conducted. Patients to be included suffer from non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease of the hip, are aged between 18 and 80 and are admitted for primary cementless unilateral total hip arthroplasty. Patients in the metal-on-metal group will receive a cementless titanium alloy acetabular component with a cobalt-chromium liner and a cobalt-chromium femoral head varying from 38 to 60 mm. Patients in the metal-on-polyethylene group will receive a cementless titanium alloy acetabular component with a polyethylene liner and a 28 mm cobalt-chromium femoral head. We will assess acetabular bone mineral density by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), serum ion concentrations of cobalt, chromium and titanium, self reported functional status (Oxford hip score), physician reported functional status and range of motion (Harris hip score), number of dislocations and prosthetic survival. Measurements will take place preoperatively, perioperatively, and postoperatively (6 weeks, 1 year, 5 years and 10 years).


CONCLUSIONS
Superior results of large head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty over conventional hip arthroplasty have been put forward by experts, case series and the industry, but to our knowledge there is no randomized controlled evidence.


CONCLUSIONS
This randomized controlled study has been designed to test whether large head metal-on-metal cementless total hip arthroplasty leads to less periprosthetic bone density loss and higher serum metal ion concentrations compared to 28 mm metal-on-polyethylene cementless total hip arthroplasty.


BACKGROUND
Netherlands Trial Registry NTR1399.
Zijlstra
Wierd P
WP
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martini Hospital, PO Box 30,033, 9700 RM Groningen, the Netherlands. wpzijlstra@hotmail.com
Bos
Nanne
N
van Raaij
Jos J A M
JJ
D019644:Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D001843:Bone Cements; D015519:Bone Density / Q000502:physiology; D002985:Clinical Protocols; D006801:Humans; D008670:Metals; D020959:Polyethylene; D011474:Prosthesis Design / Q000379:methods / Q000639:trends; D012107:Research Design
D001843:Bone Cements; D008670:Metals; D020959:Polyethylene