Comparison of reading time between screen-film mammography and soft-copied, full-field digital mammography.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the reading time for full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and screen-film mammography (SFM) using a recommended reading method and to provide data regarding the reading time required to establish the optimal conditions for digital mammography.


METHODS
Reading time was measured during image interpretation by two expert radiologists. FFDM images were taken for screening, and readers A and B read images obtained for 79 and 82 patients, respectively. The mammograms read by both readers were similar with regard to patients' backgrounds. Further, 100 SFM mammograms were read to perform comparative analyses. The reading times were compared.


RESULTS
Reader A recorded mean reading times of 31 and 56 s, respectively, for the SFM and FFDM images with no comparative mammograms, and means of 45 and 62 s for those with comparative mammograms. Reader B recorded mean reading times of 43 and 74 s, respectively, for SFM and FFDM images with no comparative mammograms, and 53 and 66 s for those with comparative mammograms.


CONCLUSIONS
The reading time is prolonged in FFDM performed according to a recommended method. Post-processing is thought to affect the reading time.
Ishiyama
Mitsutomi
M
Department of Radiology, St. Luke's International Hospital, 9-1 Akashi-cho, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-8560, Japan. mitishi@luke.or.jp
Tsunoda-Shimizu
Hiroko
H
Kikuchi
Mari
M
Saida
Yukihisa
Y
Hiramatsu
Sonoe
S
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted; D008327:Mammography; D008875:Middle Aged; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D013997:Time Factors; D055815:Young Adult