QSPR checking and validation: a case study with hydroxy radical reaction rate constant.
Traditionally, QSAR and QSPR models have been fitted by splitting the available compounds into separate learning and validation sets. The model is then fitted to the learning set and assessed using the validation set. Cross-validation (CV) uses all available compounds for both purposes, so that the full body of available information is brought to bear on both the learning and the validation portions of the study. The price paid for this additional information is a substantially greater computational load. A common mistake in using CV is to omit some of the repetitive computations. This mistake leads to substantial bias in the assessment. A hydroxyl radical reaction rate dataset is used to illustrate the superiority of CV and the pitfalls from its improper execution when modeling using nearest neighbors, paralleling behavior in the well-studied linear model setting.
School of Statistics, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA. dhawkins@umn.edu
D M
DM
Hawkins
J J
JJ
Kraker
S C
SC
Basak
D
D
Mills
D015982:Bias; D020650:Combinatorial Chemistry Techniques / Q000379:methods*; D016208:Databases, Factual; D017665:Hydroxyl Radical / Q000737:chemistry*; D007700:Kinetics; D016014:Linear Models; D021281:Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship
D017665:Hydroxyl Radical