Treatment of skeletal class II malocclusion in adults: stepwise vs single-step advancement with the Herbst appliance.
OBJECTIVE
To compare 2 groups of mature patients treated with the Herbst appliance and present a new protocol based on tissue responses to enhance skeletal response.


METHODS
Lateral cephalograms taken before and after treatment for 2 groups of patients--the first treated with the Herbst appliance with maximum jumping and the second with the Herbst appliance with stepwise advancement--were examined with conventional cephalometric analysis and the sagittal-occlusal analysis of Pancherz to assess the dental, skeletal, and soft tissue changes.


RESULTS
The mode of correction of the Class II malocclusion was through skeletal and dental changes. However, in the stepwise sample, the amount of correction due to skeletal changes was higher. In both groups, the soft tissue profile convexity was reduced significantly.


CONCLUSIONS
Herbst appliance therapy can be considered a modality for the correction of skeletal Class II malocclusions in mature patients and should be added to orthodontia's armamentarium.
Purkayastha
Shimanto K
SK
Prince Philip Dental Hospital, University of Hong Kong, 34 Hospital Road, Hong Kong.
Rabie
A Bakr M
AB
Wong
Ricky
R
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000367:Age Factors; D001846:Bone Development; D002508:Cephalometry; D005260:Female; D005858:Germany; D006723:Hong Kong; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008312:Malocclusion, Angle Class II / Q000628:therapy*; D019186:Mandibular Advancement / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D008445:Maxillofacial Development; D017289:Orthodontic Appliances, Functional; D009971:Orthodontics, Corrective / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D016896:Treatment Outcome