Similarities and differences in dream content at the cross-cultural, gender, and individual levels.
The similarities and differences in dream content at the cross-cultural, gender, and individual levels provide one starting point for carrying out studies that attempt to discover correspondences between dream content and various types of waking cognition. Hobson and Kahn's (Hobson, J. A., & Kahn, D. (2007). Dream content: Individual and generic aspects. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 850-858.) conclusion that dream content may be more generic than most researchers realize, and that individual differences are less salient than usually thought, provides the occasion for a review of findings based on the Hall and Van de Castle (Hall, C., & Van de Castle, R. (1966). The content analysis of dreams. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.) coding system for the study of dream content. Then new findings based on a computationally intensive randomization strategy are presented to show the minimum sample sizes needed to detect gender and individual differences in dream content. Generally speaking, sample sizes of 100-125 dream reports are needed because most dream elements appear in less than 50% of dream reports and the magnitude of the differences usually is not large.
William Domhoff
G
G
Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1156 High Street, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. domhoff@ucsc.edu
Schneider
Adam
A
D003071:Cognition; D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D004325:Dreams; D005783:Gender Identity; D006801:Humans; D007206:Individuality; D012494:Sampling Studies; D014851:Wakefulness