Update on the diagnosis and treatment of Barrett esophagus and related neoplastic precursor lesions.
BACKGROUND
At present, Barrett esophagus is the most common cause of esophageal adenocarcinoma. In the past 20 years, the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma in white males has exceeded that of tumors of the colorectum, lung, prostate, and skin.


OBJECTIVE
To (1) provide an evidence-based review of the diagnosis, classification, and histologic differentiation of Barrett esophagus from gastric carditis, (2) provide a summary of the key pathologic features of precursor lesions, such as dysplasia, and (3) evaluate adjunctive markers of dysplasia and predictive markers for the development of cancer. The natural history and risk of cancer in patients with Barrett esophagus is also reviewed.


METHODS
For this review, selected published peer reviewed articles were chosen from a search through PubMed between the years 1970 and 2007.


CONCLUSIONS
The current definition of Barrett esophagus is partially flawed because not all cases are endoscopically recognizable, nongoblet epithelium is biologically intestinalized, and determination of the presence or absence of goblet cells is susceptible to sampling error. Differentiation of ultrashort segment Barrett esophagus from chronic gastric carditis can be accomplished, in a minority of cases, by evaluating for the presence or absence of histologic features that are known to be associated with Barrett esophagus. Dysplasia in Barrett esophagus begins in the crypt bases and then extends more superficially to include the upper portions of the crypts and surface epithelium. Low- and high-grade dysplasia are distinguished by the presence of marked cytologic and/or architectural abnormalities in the latter compared with the former. There are few, if any, reliable adjunctive diagnostic techniques that can help differentiate nondysplastic from dysplastic epithelium. However, alpha-methylacyl coenzyme A racemase staining has been shown to be useful in 2 separate studies. Both low- and high-grade dysplasia are progressive lesions, and in general, the extent of dysplasia, particularly low grade, is a strong risk factor for progression to carcinoma. Of all the biologic and genetic biomarkers studied to date, evaluation of DNA content is the most reliable and specific. The management of patients with dysplasia is variable among institutions and ranges from aggressive surveillance, endoscopic mucosal resection, mucosal ablation, or total esophagectomy.
Odze
Robert D
RD
GI Pathology Service, Brigham andWomen's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachussetts 02115, USA. rodze@partners.org
D000230:Adenocarcinoma / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology / Q000628:therapy; D001471:Barrett Esophagus / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology / Q000628:therapy; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D018450:Disease Progression; D004938:Esophageal Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000473:pathology / Q000628:therapy; D006801:Humans