Testing Thayer's hypothesis: can camouflage work by distraction?
One of the oldest theories of animal camouflage predicts that apparently conspicuous markings enhance concealment. Such 'distraction' marks are hypothesized to work by drawing the viewer's attention away from salient features, such as the body outline, that would otherwise reveal the animal. If distraction marks enhance concealment, then they offer a route for animals to combine camouflage markings with conspicuous signalling strategies, such as warning signals. However, the theory has never been tested and remains controversial. By using camouflaged artificial prey presented to wild avian predators, we test whether distractive markings enhance concealment. In contrast to predictions, we find that markings, both circular and irregular shapes, increase predation compared with unmarked targets. Markings became increasingly costly as their contrast against the prey increased. Our experiments failed to find any empirical support for the hypothesis that distraction markings are an important aspect of camouflage in animals.
Stevens
Martin
M
Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK. ms726@cam.ac.uk
Graham
Julia
J
Winney
Isabel S
IS
Cantor
Abi
A
D000220:Adaptation, Biological; D000818:Animals; D001717:Birds; D031661:Fraxinus; D010858:Pigmentation; D011235:Predatory Behavior; D013712:Tenebrio