Foundational ethics of the health care system: the moral and practical superiority of free market reforms.
Proposed solutions to the problems of this country's health care system range along a spectrum from central planning to free market. Central planners and free market advocates provide various ethical justifications for the policies they propose. The crucial flaw in the philosophical rationale of central planning is failure to distinguish between normative and metanormative principles, which leads to mistaken understanding of the nature of rights. Natural rights, based on the principle of noninterference, provide the link between individual morality and social order. Free markets, the practical expression of natural rights, are uniquely capable of achieving the goals that central planners seek but find beyond their grasp. The history of this country's health care system and the experiences of other nations provide evidence of the superiority of free markets in reaching for the goals of universal access, control of costs, and sustaining the quality of health care.
Sade
Robert M
RM
Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, PO Box 250612, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, Charleston, SC 29425, USA. sader@musc.edu
D003695:Delivery of Health Care / Q000941:ethics* / Q000458:organization & administration; D018166:Health Care Reform / Q000941:ethics* / Q000458:organization & administration; D040821:Human Characteristics; D006801:Humans; D008389:Marketing of Health Services / Q000941:ethics*; D009014:Morals