Scientific resistance to research, training and utilization of eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy in treating post-war disorders.
In this study, Barber's [(1961). Resistance by scientists to scientific discovery. Science, 134, 596-602] analysis of scientists' resistance to discoveries is examined in relation to an 18-year controversy between the dominant cognitive-behavioral paradigm or zeitgeist and its chief rival - eye movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) in treating trauma-related disorders. Reasons for persistent opposition to training, utilization and research into an identified 'evidence-based treatment for post-traumatic stress disorder' (EBT-PTSD) within US military and veterans' agencies closely parallels Barber's description of resistance based upon socio-cultural factors and scientific bias versus genuine scientific skepticism. The implications of sustained resistance to EMDR for combat veterans and other trauma sufferers are discussed. A unified or super-ordinate goal is offered to reverse negative trends impacting current and future mental healthcare of military personnel, veterans and other trauma survivors, and to bridge the scientific impasse.
Russell
Mark C
MC
Psychology, U.S. Naval Hospital Yokosuka, Japan. mark.russell2@med.navy.mil
D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D003887:Desensitization, Psychologic; D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D005133:Eye Movements; D006801:Humans; D011585:Psychology, Applied; D012922:Social Change; D013313:Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic / Q000628:therapy*; D035703:Therapies, Investigational / Q000523:psychology*; D014481:United States; D014728:Veterans