Risk factors for house-entry by culicine mosquitoes in a rural town and satellite villages in The Gambia.
BACKGROUND
Screening doors, windows and eaves of houses should reduce house entry by eusynanthropic insects, including the common African house mosquito Culex pipiens quinquefasciatus and other culicines. In the pre-intervention year of a randomized controlled trial investigating the protective effects of house screening against mosquito house entry, a multi-factorial risk factor analysis study was used to identify factors influencing house entry by culicines of nuisance biting and medical importance. These factors were house location, architecture, human occupancy and their mosquito control activities, and the number and type of domestic animals within the compound.


RESULTS
40,407 culicines were caught; the dominant species were Culex thalassius, Cx. pipiens s.l., Mansonia africanus, M. uniformis and Aedes aegypti. There were four times more Cx. pipiens s.l. in Farafenni town (geometric mean/trap/night = 8.1, 95% confidence intervals, CIs = 7.2-9.1) than in surrounding villages (2.1, 1.9-2.3), but over five times more other culicines in the villages (25.1, 22.1-28.7) than in town (4.6, 4.2-5.2). The presence of Cx. pipiens s.l. was reduced in both settings if the house had closed eaves (odds ratios, OR town = 0.62, 95% CIs = 0.49-0.77; OR village = 0.49, 0.33-0.73), but increased per additional person in the trapping room (OR town = 1.16, 1.09-1.24; OR village = 1.10, 1.02-1.18). In the town only, Cx. pipiens s.l. numbers were reduced if houses had a thatched roof (OR = 0.70, 0.51-0.96), for each additional cow tethered near the house (OR = 0.73, 0.65-0.82) and with increasing distance from a pit latrine (OR = 0.97, 0.95-0.99). In the villages a reduction in Cx. pipiens s.l. numbers correlated with increased horses in the compound (OR = 0.90, 0.82-0.99). The presence of all other culicines was reduced in houses with closed eaves (both locations), with horses tethered outside (village only) and with increasing room height (town only), but increased with additional people in the trapping room and where cows were tethered outside (both locations).


CONCLUSIONS
The findings of this study advocate eave closure and pit latrine treatment in all locations, and zooprophylaxis using horses in rural areas, as simple control measures that could reduce the number of culicines found indoors.
Kirby
Matthew J
MJ
School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Durham University, Science Laboratories, South Road, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK. s.w.lindsay@durham.ac.uk.
West
Philippa
P
Green
Clare
C
Jasseh
Momodou
M
Lindsay
Steve W
SW