Are phonological influences on lexical (mis)selection the result of a monitoring bias?
A monitoring bias account is often used to explain speech error patterns that seem to be the result of an interactive language production system, like phonological influences on lexical selection errors. A biased monitor is suggested to detect and covertly correct certain errors more often than others. For instance, this account predicts that errors that are phonologically similar to intended words are harder to detect than those that are phonologically dissimilar. To test this, we tried to elicit phonological errors under the same conditions as those that show other kinds of lexical selection errors. In five experiments, we presented participants with high cloze probability sentence fragments followed by a picture that was semantically related, a homophone of a semantically related word, or phonologically related to the (implicit) last word of the sentence. All experiments elicited semantic completions or homophones of semantic completions, but none elicited phonological completions. This finding is hard to reconcile with a monitoring bias account and is better explained with an interactive production system. Additionally, this finding constrains the amount of bottom-up information flow in interactive models.
Severens
Els
E
Department of Experimental Psychology, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium. els.severens@ugent.be
Ratinckx
Elie
E
Ferreira
Victor S
VS
Hartsuiker
Robert J
RJ
D015982:Bias; D002755:Choice Behavior; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007807:Language Tests; D008297:Male; D010364:Pattern Recognition, Visual; D010700:Phonetics; D010775:Photic Stimulation; D012660:Semantics; D014825:Vocabulary