Tubal sterilization by laparoscopy or hysteroscopy: which is the most cost-effective procedure?
By using the activity-based cost/management (ABC/M) system we computed and compared costs needed for laparoscopic tubal sterilization (LTS) and Essure hysteroscopic tubal occlusion (EHTO). We found that total health costs related to consultation and presurgery did not differ between LTS and EHTO; EHTO has low recovery unit costs but is more costly for the operating theater, mainly due to Essure microinserts.
Franchini
Mario
M
Palagi Freestanding Unit, Florence, Italy.
Cianferoni
Luciano
L
Lippi
Giuseppe
G
Calonaci
Francesco
F
Calzolari
Stefano
S
Mazzini
Massimo
M
Florio
Pasquale
P
D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D005260:Female; D017048:Health Care Costs / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D006801:Humans; D015907:Hysteroscopy / Q000191:economics*; D007558:Italy; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000191:economics*; D011182:Postoperative Care / Q000191:economics; D011300:Preoperative Care / Q000191:economics; D012017:Referral and Consultation / Q000191:economics; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D013246:Sterilization, Tubal / Q000191:economics* / Q000379:methods*