Making disjunctions exclusive.
This work examines how people interpret the sentential connective "or", which can be viewed either inclusively (A or B or both) or exclusively (A or B but not both). Following up on prior work concerning quantifiers (Bott & Noveck, 2004; Noveck, 2001; Noveck & Posada, 2003), which shows that the common pragmatic interpretation of "some", some but not all, is conveyed as part of an effortful step, we investigate how extra effort applied to disjunctive statements leads to a pragmatic interpretation of "or", or but not both. Experiment 1 compelled participants to wait for three seconds before answering, hence giving them the opportunity to process the utterance more deeply. Experiments 2 and 3 emphasized "or", either by visual means ("OR") or by prosodic means (contrastive stress) as another way to encourage participants to apply more effort. Following a relevance-theoretic line of argument, we hypothesized that conditions encouraging more processing effort would give rise to more pragmatic inferences and hence to more exclusive interpretations of the disjunction. This prediction was confirmed in the three experiments.
Chevallier
Coralie
C
Institut des Sciences Cognitives, Lyon, France.
Noveck
Ira A
IA
Nazir
Tatjana
T
Bott
Lewis
L
Lanzetti
Valentina
V
Sperber
Dan
D
D003071:Cognition; D003657:Decision Making; D006801:Humans; D008128:Logic; D011581:Psychological Tests; D013997:Time Factors