title: The prince and the pauper. A tale of anticancer targeted agents.
abstract: Cancer rates are set to increase at an alarming rate, from 10 million new cases globally in 2000 to 15 million in 2020. Regarding the pharmacological treatment of cancer, we currently are in the interphase of two treatment eras. The so-called pregenomic therapy which names the traditional cancer drugs, mainly cytotoxic drug types, and post-genomic era-type drugs referring to rationally-based designed. Although there are successful examples of this newer drug discovery approach, most target-specific agents only provide small gains in symptom control and/or survival, whereas others have consistently failed in the clinical testing. There is however, a characteristic shared by these agents: -their high cost-. This is expected as drug discovery and development is generally carried out within the commercial rather than the academic realm. Given the extraordinarily high therapeutic drug discovery-associated costs and risks, it is highly unlikely that any single public-sector research group will see a novel chemical "probe" become a "drug". An alternative drug development strategy is the exploitation of established drugs that have already been approved for treatment of non-cancerous diseases and whose cancer target has already been discovered. This strategy is also denominated drug repositioning, drug repurposing, or indication switch. Although traditionally development of these drugs was unlikely to be pursued by Big Pharma due to their limited commercial value, biopharmaceutical companies attempting to increase productivity at present are pursuing drug repositioning. More and more companies are scanning the existing pharmacopoeia for repositioning candidates, and the number of repositioning success stories is increasing. Here we provide noteworthy examples of known drugs whose potential anticancer activities have been highlighted, to encourage further research on these known drugs as a means to foster their translation into clinical trials utilizing the more limited public-sector resources. If these drug types eventually result in being effective, it follows that they could be much more affordable for patients with cancer; therefore, their contribution in terms of reducing cancer mortality at the global level would be greater.
authors.affiliation: Unidad de Investigacion Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomedicas, UNAM/Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico City, Mexico. alfonso_duenasg@yahoo.com
authors.forename: Alfonso
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Dueñas-González
authors.forename: Patricia
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: García-López
authors.forename: Luis Alonso
authors.initials: LA
authors.lastname: Herrera
authors.forename: Jose Luis
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Medina-Franco
authors.forename: Aurora
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: González-Fierro
authors.forename: Myrna
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Candelaria
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D000970:Antineoplastic Agents / Q000145:classification / Q000627:therapeutic use*; D055808:Drug Discovery / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods / Q000639:trends; D004353:Drug Evaluation, Preclinical / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods / Q000639:trends; D004345:Drug Industry / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods / Q000639:trends; D006801:Humans; D009369:Neoplasms / Q000188:drug therapy*
chemical_list: D000970:Antineoplastic Agents