Utility and accuracy of duplex ultrasonography in evaluating in-stent restenosis after carotid stenting.
BACKGROUND
Stents alter flow velocities after carotid artery stenting (CAS). To identify criteria for in-stent restenosis (ISR), velocities obtained by duplex ultrasonography (DU) after CAS were analyzed.


METHODS
Carotid angiography and DU were performed after 129 CAS procedures. The 2 x 2 table method and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess the ability of DU to detect ISR.


RESULTS
The median follow-up period was 21.2 months (interquartile range 14-32 months). Overall, 6 patients (4.7%) had significant ISR by angiography. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the validated criteria for nonstented arteries were 100%, 85%, 25%, and 100%, respectively, to determine ISR. Newly validated criteria revealed optimal detection of ISR, with 100% sensitivity, 99% specificity, PPV of 66%, and NPV of 100%. Patients with abnormal findings on initial DU revealed increased velocities by >80% when ISR occurred.


CONCLUSIONS
DU can accurately detect ISR after CAS, but velocity criteria require modification and validation at each vascular laboratory. For patients with abnormal findings on initial DU, significant changes in velocities suggest ISR.
Cumbie
Todd
T
Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center and Dallas Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Rosero
Eric B
EB
Valentine
R James
RJ
Modrall
J Gregory
JG
Clagett
G Patrick
GP
Timaran
Carlos H
CH
D015901:Angiography, Digital Subtraction; D001783:Blood Flow Velocity; D016893:Carotid Stenosis / Q000628:therapy*; D005260:Female; D006083:Graft Occlusion, Vascular / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012372:ROC Curve; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D015607:Stents; D018616:Ultrasonography, Doppler, Duplex