The Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition: dating, stratigraphy, and isochronous markers.
Accurate and precise dating is vital to our understanding of the Middle to Upper Paleolithic transition. There are, however, a number of uncertainties in the chronologies currently available for this period. We attempt to examine these uncertainties by utilizing a number of recent developments in the field. These include: the precise dating of the Campanian Ignimbrite (CI) tephra by 40Ar/39Ar; the tracing of this tephra to a number of deposits that are radiocarbon dated; the publication of revised radiocarbon calibration data for the period, showing a much better convergence with other available data than during the recent IntCal comparison; and a layer-counted ice-core chronology extending beyond 40,000cal BP. Our data comparisons suggest that a reasonable overall convergence between calibrated radiocarbon ages and calendar dates is possible using the new curves. Additionally, we suggest that charcoal-based radiocarbon ages, as well as bone-based radiocarbon determinations, require cautious interpretation in this period. Potentially, these issues extend far beyond the sites in this study and should be of serious concern to archaeologists studying the Middle to Upper Paleolithic. We conclude by outlining a strategy for moving the science forward by a closer integration of archaeology, chronology, and stratigraphy.
Blockley
S P E
SP
Research Laboratory for Archaeology, University of Oxford, Dyson Perrins, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QY, United Kingdom. simon.blockley@rlaha.ox.ac.uk
Ramsey
C Bronk
CB
Higham
T F G
TF
D001128:Argon / Q000737:chemistry; D001499:Bayes Theorem; D002910:Chronology as Topic; D005060:Europe; D019015:Geologic Sediments; D010163:Paleontology / Q000379:methods*; D055110:Radiometric Dating / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards
D001128:Argon