title: T-bar clasp-retained removable partial denture as an alternative to implant-based prosthetic treatment.
abstract: This article reports the case of a 55-year-old female patient who presented with unsatisfactory temporary crowns in the right mandibular premolars and molars, and a premolar-to-molar fixed partial denture in the left side. The clinical and radiographic examinations revealed a fracture of the left first premolar that was a retainer of the fixed partial denture and required extraction. Initially, the acrylic resin crowns were replaced by new ones, and a provisional RPD was made using acrylic resin and orthodontic wire clasps to resolve the problem arising from the loss of the fixed partial denture. Considering the patient's high esthetic demands, the treatment options for the definitive prosthetic treatment were discussed with her and rehabilitation with implant-supported dentures was proposed because the clinical conditions of the residual alveolar ridge were suitable for implant installation, and the patient's general health was excellent. However, the patient did not agree because she knew of a failed case of implant-retained denture in a diabetic individual and was concerned. The patient was fully informed that implant installation was the best indication for her case, but the arguments were not sufficient to change her decision. The treatment possibilities were presented and the patient opted for a clasp-retained removable partial denture (RPD) associated with the placement of crowns in the pillar teeth. The temporary RPD was replaced by the definitive RPD constructed subsequently. Although RPD was not the first choice, satisfactory esthetic and functional outcomes were achieved, overcoming the patient's expectations. This case report illustrates that the dentist must be prepared to deal with situations where, for reasons that cannot be managed, the patient does not accept the treatment considered as the most indicated for his/her case. Alternatives must be proposed and the functional and esthetic requirements must be fulfilled in the best possible manner.
authors.affiliation: Department of Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, Dental School of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil. olbezzon@forp.usp.br
authors.forename: Osvaldo Luiz
authors.initials: OL
authors.lastname: Bezzon
authors.forename: Mariane
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Gonçalves
authors.forename: Valéria Oliveira
authors.initials: VO
authors.lastname: Pagnano
mesh_terms: D001641:Bicuspid / Q000293:injuries; D003442:Crowns; D000044:Dental Abutments; D016734:Dental Clasps; D015921:Dental Implants; D003779:Denture Design; D003781:Denture Retention; D003832:Denture, Partial, Removable; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007576:Jaw, Edentulous, Partially / Q000534:rehabilitation; D008875:Middle Aged; D010347:Patient Care Planning; D014081:Tooth Extraction; D014082:Tooth Fractures / Q000601:surgery; D016312:Treatment Refusal
chemical_list: D015921:Dental Implants