For better and for worse: everyday social comparisons between romantic partners.
The authors examined the frequency, direction, and impact of social comparisons between romantic partners. Comparisons were expected to occur on a daily basis, owing to regular interactions between partners. To the extent that one empathizes and shares outcomes with one's partner, one might respond more positively to upward than to downward comparisons. Study 1a was an experience-sampling study in which participants reported comparisons made to their spouse over 2 weeks. Study 1b examined reactions to the most significant comparisons made during the experience-sampling study. Participants reported making comparisons to their romantic partner more than once a day on average and experienced more positive responses to upward than to downward comparisons. Study 2 demonstrated that participants empathized and shared outcomes with their partner to a greater extent than with a friend. Study 3 confirmed that participants responded more positively to upward than to downward comparisons even for domains high in self-relevance and even when the comparison had negative self-evaluative implications. These results suggest that, owing to higher levels of empathy and shared fate with partners, comparisons function differently in romantic than in other relationships.
Pinkus
Rebecca T
RT
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. rt.pinkus@utoronto.ca
Lockwood
Penelope
P
Schimmack
Ulrich
U
Fournier
Marc A
MA
D000223:Adaptation, Psychological; D000328:Adult; D034201:Computers, Handheld; D004291:Dominance-Subordination; D004644:Emotions; D004645:Empathy; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008297:Male; D008393:Marriage / Q000523:psychology*; D008875:Middle Aged; D012649:Self Concept; D012928:Social Desirability