Diagnosis of hepatic metastasis: comparison of respiration-triggered diffusion-weighted echo-planar MRI and five t2-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to compare the value of respiration-triggered diffusion-weighted (DW) single-shot echo-planar MRI (EPI) and five variants of T2-weighted turbo spin-echo (TSE) sequences in the diagnosis of hepatic metastasis.


METHODS
Fifty-two patients with extrahepatic primary malignant tumors underwent 1.5-T MRI that included DW EPI and the following variants of T2-weighted TSE techniques: breath-hold fat-suppressed HASTE, breath-hold fat-supressed TSE, respiration-triggered fat-suppressed TSE, breath-hold STIR, and respiration-triggered STIR. Images were reviewed independently by two blinded observers who used a 5-point confidence scale to identify lesions. Results were correlated with surgical and histopathologic findings and follow-up imaging findings. The accuracy of each technique was measured with free-response receiver operating characteristic analysis.


RESULTS
A total of 118 hepatic metastatic lesions (mean diameter, 12.8 mm; range, 3-84 mm) were evaluated. Accuracy values were higher (p < 0.001) with DW EPI (0.91-0.92) than with the T2-weighted TSE techniques (0.47-0.67). Imaging with the HASTE sequence (0.47-0.52) was less accurate (p < 0.05) than imaging with the breath-hold TSE, breath-hold STIR, respiration-triggered TSE, and respiration-triggered STIR sequences (0.59-0.67). Sensitivity was higher (p < 0.001) with DW EPI (0.88-0.91) than with T2-weighted TSE techniques (0.45-0.62). For small (< or = 10 mm) metastatic lesions only, the differences in sensitivity between DW EPI (0.85) and T2-weighted TSE techniques (0.26-0.44) were even more pronounced.


CONCLUSIONS
DW EPI was more sensitive and more accurate than imaging with T2-weighted TSE techniques. Because of the black-blood effect on vessels and low susceptibility to motion artifacts, DW EPI was particularly useful for the detection of small (< or = 10 mm) metastatic lesions.
Bruegel
Melanie
M
Department of Radiology, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, D-81675 Munich, Germany. mbruegel@roe.med.tum.de
Gaa
Jochen
J
Waldt
Simone
S
Woertler
Klaus
K
Holzapfel
Konstantin
K
Kiefer
Berthold
B
Rummeny
Ernst J
EJ
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D038524:Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D017352:Echo-Planar Imaging / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007089:Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods*; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D008113:Liver Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000556:secondary*; D008875:Middle Aged; D016609:Neoplasms, Second Primary / Q000175:diagnosis*; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D015656:Respiratory Mechanics; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity