title: Contrasting impacts of invasive engineers on freshwater ecosystems: an experiment and meta-analysis.
abstract: Invasion by common carp (Cyprinus carpio) and red swamp crayfish (Procambarus clarkii) in shallow lakes have been followed by stable-state changes from a macrophyte-dominated clear water state to a phytoplankton-dominated turbid water state. Both invasive carp and crayfish are, therefore, possible drivers for catastrophic regime shifts. Despite these two species having been introduced into ecosystems world-wide, their relative significance on regime shifts remains largely unexplored. We compared the ecological impacts of carp and crayfish on submerged macrophytes, water quality, phytoplankton, nutrient dynamics, zooplankton and benthic macroinvertebrates by combining an enclosure experiment and a meta-analysis. The experiment was designed to examine how water quality and biological variables responded to increasing carp or crayfish biomass. We found that even at a low biomass, carp had large and positive impacts on suspended solids, phytoplankton and nutrients and negative impacts on benthic macroinvertebrates. In contrast, crayfish had a strong negative impact on submerged macrophytes. The impacts of crayfish on macrophytes were significantly greater than those of carp. The meta-analysis showed that both carp and crayfish have significant effects on submerged macrophytes, phytoplankton, nutrient dynamics and benthic macroinvertebrates, while zooplankton are affected by carp but not crayfish. It also indicated that crayfish have significantly greater impacts on macrophytes relative to carp. Overall, the meta-analysis largely supported the results of the experiment. Taken as a whole, our results show that both carp and crayfish have profound effects on community composition and ecosystem processes through combined consequences of bioturbation, excretion, consumption and non-consumptive destruction. However, key variables (e.g. macrophytes) relating to stable-state changes responded differently to increasing carp or crayfish biomass, indicating that they have differential ecosystem impacts.
authors.affiliation: Department of Ecosystem Studies, Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 1-1-1 Yayoi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8657, Japan. matsuzaki.shinichiro@nies.go.jp
authors.forename: Shin-Ichiro S
authors.initials: SS
authors.lastname: Matsuzaki
authors.forename: Nisikawa
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Usio
authors.forename: Noriko
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Takamura
authors.forename: Izumi
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Washitani
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D003400:Astacoidea / Q000502:physiology*; D018533:Biomass; D002347:Carps / Q000502:physiology*; D017753:Ecosystem; D004780:Environment, Controlled; D005618:Fresh Water; D010839:Phytoplankton / Q000254:growth & development; D011156:Population Density; D011157:Population Dynamics; D015048:Zooplankton / Q000254:growth & development