title: Experts opinion about system of the performance evaluation criteria weighted per positons in the water polo game.
abstract: The goal of the research was to define experts opinion about adequate criteria for water polo players' actual quality evaluation and to determine experts opinion about weight coefficients (ponders) of the here defined criteria across the playing positions in the game of water polo. Based upon the expertise performed by ten water polo professionals, the relative importance coefficients with regard to playing positions in the game were determined for twenty seven performance evaluation criteria. High degree of interobserves' agreement was obtained regarding all positions (from 0.93 to 0.96). In concordance with the obtained results the particular playing positions were explicitly described, as well as the similarities and the differences between them were determined from the aspect of the single criteria importance. The research results could be usefully applied by the water polo practitioners for the selection and follow-up of players during training programme implementation, and for programming, control and evaluation of transformational effects.
authors.affiliation: Faculty of Natural Sciences, Mathematics and Kinesiology, University of Split, Split, Croatia. mhraste@pmfst.hr
authors.forename: Mladen
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hraste
authors.forename: Drazan
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Dizdar
authors.forename: Viktorija
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Trninić
mesh_terms: D054874:Athletic Performance; D005104:Expert Testimony / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards; D006801:Humans; D012015:Reference Standards; D013177:Sports