Comparing measures of cystatin C in human sera by three methods.
BACKGROUND
Cystatin C (Cys C) is measured by particle-enhanced nephelometric immunoassay (PENIA), particle-enhanced turbidimetric immunoassay (PETIA) and ELISA.


OBJECTIVE
To determine differences among these methods.


METHODS
80 normal human sera and 20 from patients with renal and/or heart disease were simultaneously assayed. Statistical analyses including receiver operating characteristics (ROC) of the three methods were compared.


RESULTS
There was a highly significant correlation across the assay range between the ELISA and PENIA (r(2) = 0.94) and PETIA methods (r(2) = 0.95). Analysis of variance and bias were poor between the ELISA and the other two methods. Mean difference between ELISA and PETIA was 0.65 +/- 0.63 microg/ml, while it was 0.58 +/- 0.53 microg/ml between ELISA and PENIA. Accuracy (at 30% range) was 17 and 11% between ELISA and PETIA and ELISA and PENIA, respectively. Normalization of the ELISA by a factor of 0.66 improved this relationship. AUC of ROC curves of PENIA, ELISA and normalized ELISA to predict Cys C levels measured from PETIA were all above 0.87 (p = not significant between curves). Criterion values of ELISA*.66 method was close to PETIA measurements.


CONCLUSIONS
There is a significant difference in measured human Cys C levels among the three methods, and normalization of ELISA narrows these differences.
Hossain
Mohammad Akhtar
MA
Saskatchewan Transplant Program, St. Paul's Hospital, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.
Emara
Mahmoud
M
El Moselhi
Hamdi
H
Shoker
Ahmed
A
D055316:Cystatin C / Q000097:blood*; D004797:Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; D006801:Humans; D009391:Nephelometry and Turbidimetry; D012372:ROC Curve; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity
D055316:Cystatin C