Reconstruction of large iliac crest defects after graft harvest using autogenous rib graft: a prospective controlled study.
METHODS
Prospective controlled study analyzing the donor site morbidity after reconstruction of full thickness iliac crest defects, using autologous rib grafts.


OBJECTIVE
To compare the pain and cosmetic outcomes of patients with iliac crest reconstruction with those who have had no reconstruction of the iliac crest.


BACKGROUND
Chronic donor site pain and poor cosmesis have been the major deterrents in using iliac crest for long-segment spinal reconstructions. Iliac crest reconstruction with rib has been reported but most studies are uncontrolled and retrospective.


METHODS
Patients with iliac defects <25 mm after graft harvest were excluded. Twenty patients were reconstructed using autogenous rib graft harvested during the anterolateral approach to spine. Rib graft of the appropriate contour was impacted into the notches created in the iliac crest defect. The control group comprised 16 patients without reconstruction of the iliac crest. The pain, cosmesis, and functional disability were assessed on the basis of visual analog scores and a predesigned questionnaire. Judet iliac views were used to assess the incorporation of the rib graft. Evaluation was performed at 1.5, 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively.


RESULTS
Intensity and incidence of pain was significantly lower in the reconstructed group. Cosmetic outcome was also significantly better in this group. Patients in control group had significant complications related to the tenting of skin over the defect such as bursitis and skin necrosis. Radiologic incorporation was documented in 95% of patients with 1 patient having resorption of the rib graft.


CONCLUSIONS
Rib graft reconstruction provides a cheap and effective alternative for iliac crest reconstruction. Patients undergoing thoracotomy or thoraco-phrenico-lumbotomy for spinal reconstruction, the unutilized rib graft should be used to reconstruct the iliac defect. Reduced donor site morbidity and better cosmesis are the major benefits of reconstruction.
Bapat
Mihir R
MR
King Edward Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai 400 014, India. mrbkemh@rediffmail.com
Chaudhary
Kshitij
K
Garg
Hitesh
H
Laheri
Vinod
V
D000328:Adult; D016025:Bone Transplantation / Q000009:adverse effects*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007085:Ilium / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D008297:Male; D016348:Osseointegration; D010146:Pain / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology; D010147:Pain Measurement; D011183:Postoperative Complications / Q000517:prevention & control* / Q000601:surgery; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011859:Radiography; D019651:Plastic Surgery Procedures / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D012272:Ribs / Q000637:transplantation*; D016037:Single-Blind Method; D013131:Spine / Q000601:surgery*; D013908:Thoracotomy; D014182:Transplantation, Autologous