Alternative mechanisms for regulating racial responses according to internal vs external cues.
Personal (internal) and normative (external) impetuses for regulating racially biased behaviour are well-documented, yet the extent to which internally and externally driven regulatory processes arise from the same mechanism is unknown. Whereas the regulation of race bias according to internal cues has been associated with conflict-monitoring processes and activation of the dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC), we proposed that responses regulated according to external cues to respond without prejudice involves mechanisms of error-perception, a process associated with rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) activity. We recruited low-prejudice participants who reported high or low sensitivity to non-prejudiced norms, and participants completed a stereotype inhibition task in private or public while electroencephalography was recorded. Analysis of event-related potentials revealed that the error-related negativity component, linked to dACC activity, predicted behavioural control of bias across conditions, whereas the error-perception component, linked to rACC activity, predicted control only in public among participants sensitive to external pressures to respond without prejudice.
Amodio
David M
DM
New York University, New York, NY, USA. david.amodio@nyu.edu
Kubota
Jennifer T
JT
Harmon-Jones
Eddie
E
Devine
Patricia G
PG
D000328:Adult; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology*; D003463:Cues; D004569:Electroencephalography; D005006:Ethnicity; D005260:Female; D006179:Gyrus Cinguli / Q000502:physiology*; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D009042:Motivation; D011287:Prejudice; D013240:Stereotyping; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires