Fracture resistance of teeth restored with different post systems using new-generation adhesives.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to investigate the fracture strength of three post systems cemented with a dual cure composite resin luting cement by using different adhesive systems.


METHODS
In this study 63 extracted anterior teeth with single roots were endodontically prepared and filled. Teeth were randomly assigned to one of three post systems placed into the prepared canals: Group I - titanium posts (n=21) (Filpost); Group II - glass fiber posts (n=21) (Mirafit White); and Group III zirconia posts (n=21) (CosmoPost). Each group was again randomly divided into three subgroups according to the bonding materials used [Single Bond (n=7), Clearfil SE Bond (n=7), and Prompt L Pop (n=7)]. A dual cured resin cement (Rely X ARC) was used for bonding the posts into the root canals. Standard cores were made by a composite resin (Clearfil Photocore) using core build-ups. The samples were tested in the compression test machine for 1 mm/min and fracture resistance of the teeth were recorded. The data was analyzed by using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan's New Multiple Range Tests. A significance level of p<.05 was used for all comparisons.


RESULTS
There was a significant difference in fracture resistance between the post systems (p<0.05) and the interaction of adhesive resins and post systems (p<0.05). Mirafit White was more resistant to fracture than other groups; Filpost showed the least resistance to fracture. CosmoPost post system bonded with Single Bond recorded the lowest fracture resistance (p<0.05).


CONCLUSIONS
Endodontically treated anterior teeth restored with glass fiber posts exhibited higher failure loads than teeth restored with zirconia and titanium posts. Self-etching adhesives are better alternatives to etch-and-rinse adhesive systems for luting post systems.


CONCLUSIONS
Under the condition of this study, glass fiber posts are preferable to restore endodontically treated anterior teeth.
Kivanç
Bagdagül Helvacioglu
BH
Department of Operative Dentistry and Endodontics at the Faculty of Dentistry, University of Gazi, Ankara, Turkey. bagdagul@gazi.edu.tr
Görgül
Güliz
G
D000134:Acid Etching, Dental / Q000379:methods; D017438:Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate; D019245:Compressive Strength; D001840:Dental Bonding; D003776:Dental Porcelain; D003799:Dental Stress Analysis; D017220:Dentin-Bonding Agents; D005898:Glass; D006801:Humans; D007180:Incisor; D011092:Polyethylene Glycols; D011109:Polymethacrylic Acids; D011176:Post and Core Technique; D019279:Resin Cements; D014025:Titanium; D014082:Tooth Fractures / Q000517:prevention & control*; D015040:Zirconium
D017220:Dentin-Bonding Agents; D011109:Polymethacrylic Acids; C462240:RelyX ARC; D019279:Resin Cements; C009753:fiberglass; D003776:Dental Porcelain; D011092:Polyethylene Glycols; D017438:Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate; D015040:Zirconium; D014025:Titanium; C028541:zirconium oxide