A comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexy: objective outcome and perioperative differences.
The purpose of this study was to compare anatomic and perioperative outcomes following laparoscopic sacral colpopexy (LSC) and abdominal sacral colpopexy (ASC). The hypothesis is that the laparoscopic technique has similar anatomic outcomes as compared with the open technique. A retrospective comparative chart review was conducted consisting of 43 patients who underwent laparoscopic sacral colpopexy and 41 patients who underwent abdominal sacral colpopexy. Demographics were comparable between groups except mean follow-up time (LSC = 7.4 months, ASC = 10.6 months). Mean improvement at the apex was similar between the two groups. Hospital stay in hours was shorter for the LSC group (mean/median = 35.4/30.9) than the ASC group (mean/median = 63.3/54.1, p < 0.001). Mean operative time was similar (LSC = 183, ASC = 168 min, p = NS) and complication rates were comparable between the groups. Patients undergoing laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexy have comparable anatomical outcomes and operative times. Laparoscopy affords a shorter hospital stay.
Klauschie
Jennifer L
JL
Department of Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA. Klauschie.Jennifer@Mayo.edu
Suozzi
Brent A
BA
O'Brien
Maureen M
MM
McBride
Andrew W
AW
D034861:Abdominal Wall / Q000601:surgery*; D003365:Costs and Cost Analysis; D005260:Female; D013509:Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D010535:Laparoscopy / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D007902:Length of Stay; D008875:Middle Aged; D019990:Perioperative Care / Q000191:economics / Q000379:methods*; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D012445:Sacrococcygeal Region; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014596:Uterine Prolapse / Q000601:surgery*; D014621:Vagina / Q000601:surgery*