title: Ligand-induced conformational changes in a thermophilic ribose-binding protein.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Members of the periplasmic binding protein (PBP) superfamily are involved in transport and signaling processes in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. Biological responses are typically mediated by ligand-induced conformational changes in which the binding event is coupled to a hinge-bending motion that brings together two domains in a closed form. In all PBP-mediated biological processes, downstream partners recognize the closed form of the protein. This motion has also been exploited in protein engineering experiments to construct biosensors that transduce ligand binding to a variety of physical signals. Understanding the mechanistic details of PBP conformational changes, both global (hinge bending, twisting, shear movements) and local (rotamer changes, backbone motion), therefore is not only important for understanding their biological function but also for protein engineering experiments.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Here we present biochemical characterization and crystal structure determination of the periplasmic ribose-binding protein (RBP) from the hyperthermophile Thermotoga maritima in its ribose-bound and unliganded state. The T. maritima RBP (tmRBP) has 39% sequence identity and is considerably more resistant to thermal denaturation (app Tm value is 108 degrees C) than the mesophilic Escherichia coli homolog (ecRBP) (app Tm value is 56 degrees C). Polar ligand interactions and ligand-induced global conformational changes are conserved among ecRBP and tmRBP; however local structural rearrangements involving side-chain motions in the ligand-binding site are not conserved.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Although the large-scale ligand-induced changes are mediated through similar regions, and are produced by similar backbone movements in tmRBP and ecRBP, the small-scale ligand-induced structural rearrangements differentiate the mesophile and thermophile. This suggests there are mechanistic differences in the manner by which these two proteins bind their ligands and are an example of how two structurally similar proteins utilize different mechanisms to form a ligand-bound state.
authors.affiliation: The Department of Biochemistry, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. mjc18@duke.edu
authors.forename: Matthew J
authors.initials: MJ
authors.lastname: Cuneo
authors.forename: Lorena S
authors.initials: LS
authors.lastname: Beese
authors.forename: Homme W
authors.initials: HW
authors.lastname: Hellinga
mesh_terms: D000595:Amino Acid Sequence; D001483:Base Sequence; D001665:Binding Sites; D018360:Crystallography, X-Ray; D029968:Escherichia coli Proteins / Q000737:chemistry / Q000378:metabolism; D008024:Ligands; D008958:Models, Molecular; D008969:Molecular Sequence Data; D033902:Periplasmic Binding Proteins / Q000737:chemistry* / Q000378:metabolism; D011487:Protein Conformation; D017510:Protein Folding; D013696:Temperature; D020124:Thermotoga maritima
chemical_list: D029968:Escherichia coli Proteins; D008024:Ligands; D033902:Periplasmic Binding Proteins; C028003:RbsB protein, E coli