Assessing the use of cognitive heuristic representativeness in clinical reasoning.
We performed a pilot study to investigate use of the cognitive heuristic Representativeness in clinical reasoning. We tested a set of tasks and assessments to determine whether subjects used the heuristics in reasoning, to obtain initial frequencies of heuristic use and related cognitive errors, and to collect cognitive process data using think-aloud techniques. The study investigates two aspects of the Representativeness heuristic - judging by perceived frequency and representativeness as causal beliefs. Results show that subjects apply both aspects of the heuristic during reasoning, and make errors related to misapplication of these heuristics. Subjects in this study rarely used base rates, showed significant variability in their recall of base rates, demonstrated limited ability to use provided base rates, and favored causal data in diagnosis. We conclude that the tasks and assessments we have developed provide a suitable test-bed to study the cognitive processes underlying heuristic errors.
Payne
Velma L
VL
Department of Biomedical Informatics, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, USA.
Crowley
Rebecca S
RS
Crowley
Rebecca
R
D003071:Cognition; D003657:Decision Making; D006801:Humans; D019300:Medical Errors / Q000517:prevention & control*; D008959:Models, Neurological; D013647:Task Performance and Analysis; D013850:Thinking