title: Eye movements and non-canonical reading: comments on.
abstract: Kennedy and Pynte [Kennedy, A., & Pynte, J. (2008). The consequences of violations to reading order: An eye movement analysis. Vision Research, 48, 2309-2320] presented data that they suggested pose problems for models of eye movement control in reading in which words are encoded serially. They focus on situations in which pairs of words are fixated out of order (i.e., the first word is skipped and the second fixated prior to a regression back to the first word). We strongly disagree with their claims and contest their arguments. We argue that their data set was obtained selectively and the events they believe are problematic do not occur frequently during reading. Furthermore, we do not consider that Kennedy and Pynte's arguments pose serious difficulties for serial models of reading such as E-Z Reader.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, USA. krayner@ucsd.edu
authors.forename: Keith
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Rayner
authors.forename: Alexander
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Pollatsek
authors.forename: Simon P
authors.initials: SP
authors.lastname: Liversedge
authors.forename: Erik D
authors.initials: ED
authors.lastname: Reichle
mesh_terms: D005133:Eye Movements / Q000502:physiology*; D005403:Fixation, Ocular / Q000502:physiology; D006801:Humans; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011597:Psychomotor Performance / Q000502:physiology; D011932:Reading; D012660:Semantics