title: Metacognition and part-set cuing: can interference be predicted at retrieval?
abstract: Although prior research has examined predictions of memory performance under conditions of interference at encoding, predictions of memory performance have not been examined for interference introduced via cues at retrieval. This was investigated in the present study by exposing participants to a random subset of to-be-recalled items just prior to retrieval (part-set cuing) and then eliciting an overall prediction of memory performance. Across three experiments, participants in part-set cuing conditions recalled proportionally fewer items than did participants who were not exposed to any cues. However, participants were unable to predict the detrimental effect of part-set cues on memory performance in either a semantic (Experiment 1) or an episodic (Experiment 2) memory task. Predictions were better calibrated after practice with part-set cuing, and there was evidence that prior experience with part-set cuing transferred to predictions made for a different part-set cuing task (Experiment 3). This suggests that only under some conditions are participants sensitive to the diminished accessibility of memories wrought by part-set cues and illustrates situations in which participants are or are not aware of variables at retrieval that influence memory performance.
authors.affiliation: Department of Psychology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1876, USA. matthew.rhodes@colostate.edu
authors.forename: Matthew G
authors.initials: MG
authors.lastname: Rhodes
authors.forename: Alan D
authors.initials: AD
authors.lastname: Castel
mesh_terms: D003071:Cognition; D003463:Cues; D006801:Humans; D011939:Mental Recall; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011584:Psychology / Q000379:methods