title: Dual or unitary system? Two alternative models of decision making.
abstract: In recent years, a lively debate in neuroeconomics has focused on what appears to be a fundamental question: Is the brain a unitary or a dual system? We are still far from a consensus view. The accumulating evidence supports both sides of the debate. A reason for the difficulty in reaching a convincing solution is that we do not yet have a clear theoretical model for either position. Here I review the basic elements and potential building blocks for such theories, using sources in large measure from classical decision theory and game theory.
authors.affiliation: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. arust@econ.umn.edu
authors.forename: Aldo
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Rustichini
mesh_terms: D003071:Cognition; D003657:Decision Making; D003662:Decision Theory; D005716:Game Theory; D006801:Humans; D018803:Models, Economic; D008962:Models, Theoretical; D012201:Reward; D012309:Risk-Taking