title: Comment on "Ring-breaking electron attachment to uracil: Following bond dissociations via evolving resonances" [J. Chem. Phys. 128, 174302 (2008)].
abstract: We point out that the assignment of pi(*) resonances to calculated features in a recent paper by Gianturco et al. [J. Chem. Phys.128, 174302 (2008)] cannot be correct.
authors.affiliation: A. A. Noyes Laboratory of Chemical Physics, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125, USA. carl@schwinger.caltech.edu
authors.forename: Carl
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Winstead
authors.forename: Vincent
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: McKoy
mesh_terms: D001554:Benzene / Q000737:chemistry; D003198:Computer Simulation; D004583:Electrons; D008956:Models, Chemical; D011789:Quantum Theory; D014498:Uracil / Q000737:chemistry*
chemical_list: D014498:Uracil; D001554:Benzene