Use of anthropometric indicators in screening for undiagnosed vertebral fractures: a cross-sectional analysis of the Fukui Osteoporosis Cohort (FOC) study.
BACKGROUND
Vertebral fractures are the most common type of osteoporotic fracture. Although often asymptomatic, each vertebral fracture increases the risk of additional fractures. Development of a safe and simple screening method is necessary to identify individuals with asymptomatic vertebral fractures.


METHODS
Lateral imaging of the spine by single energy X-ray absorptiometry and vertebral morphometry were conducted in 116 Japanese women (mean age: 69.9 +/- 9.3 yr). Vertebral deformities were diagnosed by the McCloskey-Kanis criteria and were used as a proxy for vertebral fractures. We evaluated whether anthropometric parameters including arm span-height difference (AHD), wall-occiput distance (WOD), and rib-pelvis distance (RPD) were related to vertebral deformities. Positive findings were defined for AHD as > or = 4.0 cm, for WOD as > or = 5 mm, and for RPD as < or = two fingerbreadths. Receiver operating characteristics curves analysis was performed, and cut-off values were determined to give maximum difference between sensitivity and false-positive rate. Expected probabilities for vertebral deformities were calculated using logistic regression analysis.


RESULTS
The mean AHD for those participants with and without vertebral deformities were 7.0 +/- 4.1 cm and 4.2 +/- 4.2 cm (p < 0.01), respectively. Sensitivity and specificity for use of AHD-positive, WOD-positive and RPD-positive values in predicting vertebral deformities were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.69, 1.01) and 0.52 (95% CI: 0.42, 0.62); 0.70 (95% CI: 0.50, 0.90) and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.57, 0.76); and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.47, 0.87) and 0.59 (95% CI: 0.50, 0.69), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio for a positive result (LR) for use of combined AHD-positive and WOD-positive values were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.44, 0.86), 0.81 (95% CI: 0.73, 0.89), and 3.47 (95% CI: 3.01, 3.99), respectively. The expected probability of vertebral deformities (P) was obtained by the equation; P = 1-(exp [-1.327-0.040 x body weight +1.332 x WOD-positive + 1.623 x AHD-positive])-1. The sensitivity, specificity and LR for use of a 0.306 cut-off value for probability of vertebral fractures were 0.65 (95% CI: 0.44, 0.86), 0.87 (95% CI: 0.80, 0.93), and 4.82 (95% CI: 4.00, 5.77), respectively.


CONCLUSIONS
Both WOD and AHD effectively predicted vertebral deformities. This screening method could be used in a strategy to prevent additional vertebral fractures, even when X-ray technology is not available.
Abe
Kiyoko
K
Department of Public Health, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka-sayama, Japan. gac-abe@sage.ocn.ne.jp
Tamaki
Junko
J
Kadowaki
Eiko
E
Sato
Yuho
Y
Morita
Akemi
A
Komatsu
Misa
M
Takeuchi
Sayaka
S
Kajita
Etsuko
E
Iki
Masayuki
M
D015502:Absorptiometry, Photon / Q000379:methods; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000886:Anthropometry / Q000379:methods*; D015415:Biomarkers / Q000032:analysis; D015331:Cohort Studies; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000379:methods*; D008875:Middle Aged; D015663:Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal / Q000150:complications*; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D013121:Spinal Curvatures / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000209:etiology; D016103:Spinal Fractures / Q000175:diagnosis*; D013131:Spine / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000473:pathology
D015415:Biomarkers