Critical technical elements of state bioassessment programs: a process to evaluate program rigor and comparability.
We developed a systematic process to evaluate state/tribal bioassessment programs to provide information about the rigor of the technical approach. This is accomplished via on-site interviews to produce an evaluation that assigns one of four levels of rigor as an outcome. Level 4 is the most rigorous and reflects a technical capacity to accurately determine incremental condition and support management programs. The remaining three levels are less able to assess incremental condition and are appropriate for only some management support needs. Accurately determining impairment and diagnosing pollution-specific stressors are fundamental tasks that states/tribes must accomplish to provide management support. This goal is fulfilled to varying degrees by most states/tribes. The evaluation employs a checklist and a sliding scale of rigor for 13 technical elements. Feedback is provided to each state/tribe via a technical memorandum that describes the technical components of the monitoring program, highlights strengths, and recommends improvements for specific technical issues. This can be used to refine the bioassessment and monitoring programs to better support management programs. The results of 14 state/tribal evaluations are included here. The majority (nine states, one tribe) revealed that most operate at level 2 with developmental activities that will elevate the level of program rigor already underway. Two states operate level 4 programs and each have numeric biocriteria and refined designated uses in their water quality standards. This is the ultimate goal of the process of engaging states in the development of bioassessment programs in the U.S.
Yoder
Chris O
CO
Center for Applied Bioassessment & Biocriteria, Midwest Biodiversity Institute, P.O. Box 21561, Columbus, OH 43221-0561, USA. yoder@rrohio.com
Barbour
Michael T
MT
D000818:Animals; D017598:Efficiency, Organizational; D004784:Environmental Monitoring / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000379:methods* / Q000592:standards*; D004785:Environmental Pollutants; D006801:Humans; D015397:Program Evaluation / Q000379:methods*; D014481:United States; D014484:United States Environmental Protection Agency
D004785:Environmental Pollutants