Eugenics from the New Deal to the Great Society: genetics, demography and population quality.
The relationship between biological and social scientists as regards the study of human traits and behavior has often been perceived in terms of mutual distrust, even antipathy. In the interwar period, population study seemed an area that might allow for closer relations between them-united as they were by a concern to improve the eugenic quality of populations. Yet these relations were in tension: by the early post-war era, social demographers were denigrating the contributions of biologists to the study of population problems as embodying the elitist ideology of eugenics. In response to this loss of credibility, the eugenics movement pursued a simultaneous program of withdrawal and expansion: its leaders helped focus concern with biological quality onto the developing field of medical genetics, while at the same moment, extended their scope to improving the social quality of populations through birth control policies, guided by demography. While this approach maintained boundaries between the social and the biological, in the 1960s, a revitalized American Eugenics Society helped reunite leading demographers and geneticists. This paper will assess the reasons for this period of influence for eugenics, and explore its implications for the social and biological study of human populations.
Ramsden
Edmund
E
The Centre for Medical History, School of Humanities and Social Science, Amory Building, Rennes Drive, Exeter EX4 4RJ, UK. E.Ramsden@exeter.ac.uk
D003710:Demography; D005053:Eugenics / Q000266:history*; D005826:Genetics, Medical / Q000266:history*; D005828:Genetics, Population / Q000266:history*; D049673:History, 20th Century; D006801:Humans; D044382:Population Groups / Q000235:genetics / Q000266:history