title: 2D versus 3D in the kinematic analysis of the horse at the trot.
abstract: The handled trot of three Lusitano Purebred stallions was analyzed by using 2D and 3D kinematical analysis methods. Using the same capture and analysis system, 2D and 3D data of some linear (stride length, maximal height of the hoof trajectories) and angular (angular range of motion, inclination of bone segments) variables were obtained. A paired Student T-test was performed in order to detect statistically significant differences between data resulting from the two methodologies With respect to the angular variables, there were significant differences in scapula inclination, shoulder angle, cannon inclination and protraction-retraction angle in the forelimb variables, but none of them were statistically different in the hind limb. Differences between the two methods were found in most of the linear variables analyzed.
authors.affiliation: Department of Compared Anatomy and Pathology, Córdoba University, Córdoba, Spain.
authors.forename: F
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Miró
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Santos
authors.forename: J L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Garrido-Castro
authors.forename: A M
authors.initials: AM
authors.lastname: Galisteo
authors.forename: R
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Medina-Carnicer
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D001696:Biomechanical Phenomena; D005552:Forelimb / Q000502:physiology*; D005684:Gait; D006614:Hindlimb / Q000502:physiology*; D006736:Horses / Q000502:physiology*; D007091:Image Processing, Computer-Assisted / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods*; D021621:Imaging, Three-Dimensional / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods; D008297:Male; D016059:Range of Motion, Articular; D014743:Videotape Recording / Q000295:instrumentation / Q000379:methods