title: Hope, truth, and preparing for death: perspectives of surrogate decision makers.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Although many physicians worry that openly discussing a poor prognosis will cause patients and families to lose hope, surrogate decision makers' perspectives on this topic are largely unknown.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To determine surrogate decision makers' attitudes toward balancing hope and telling the truth when discussing prognosis.
  
  
  METHODS
  Prospective, mixed-methods cohort study.
  
  
  METHODS
  4 intensive care units at the University of California, San Francisco, Medical Center, San Francisco, California.
  
  
  METHODS
  179 surrogate decision makers for incapacitated patients at high risk for death.
  
  
  METHODS
  One-on-one, semistructured interviews with surrogates were conducted on the patients' 5th day of receiving mechanical ventilation. Constant comparative methods were used to inductively develop a framework to describe participants' responses. Validation methods included multidisciplinary analysis and member checking.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Overall, 93% (166 of 179) of surrogates felt that avoiding discussions about prognosis is an unacceptable way to maintain hope. The main explanatory theme was that timely discussion of prognosis is essential to allow family members to prepare emotionally and logistically for the possibility of a patient's death. Other themes that emerged included surrogates' belief that an accurate understanding of a patient's prognosis allows them to better support the patient and each other, a moral aversion to the idea of false hope, the perception that physicians have an obligation to discuss prognosis, and the notion that some surrogates look to physicians primarily for truth and seek hope elsewhere. A few surrogates (6 of 179) felt that physicians should withhold prognostic information because of a belief that discussing death could be emotionally damaging to the family or could negatively affect the patient's health.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The authors did not longitudinally assess whether early disclosure about prognosis predicts fewer adverse bereavement outcomes.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Most surrogates of critically ill patients do not view withholding prognostic information as an acceptable way to maintain hope, largely because timely discussions about prognosis help families begin to prepare emotionally, existentially, and practically for the possibility that a patient will die.
authors.affiliation: University of California, San Francisco, and San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California 94143, USA.
authors.forename: Latifat
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Apatira
authors.forename: Elizabeth A
authors.initials: EA
authors.lastname: Boyd
authors.forename: Grace
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Malvar
authors.forename: Leah R
authors.initials: LR
authors.lastname: Evans
authors.forename: John M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Luce
authors.forename: Bernard
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Lo
authors.forename: Douglas B
authors.initials: DB
authors.lastname: White
mesh_terms: D016638:Critical Illness / Q000523:psychology; D003643:Death; D003657:Decision Making; D004644:Emotions; D005190:Family / Q000523:psychology; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008297:Male; D010820:Physicians / Q000523:psychology*; D011368:Professional-Family Relations; D011379:Prognosis; D019727:Proxy; D012495:San Francisco; D014342:Truth Disclosure