Rethinking radical politics in the context of assisted reproductive technology.
Radical feminists have argued for both the radical potential of assisted reproductive technology (ART) and its oppressive and damaging effects for women. This paper will address the question of what constitutes a radical feminist position on ART; I will argue that the very debate over whether ART liberates or oppresses women is misguided, and that instead the issue should be understood dialectically. Reproductive technologies are neither inherently liberating nor entirely oppressive: we can only understand the potential and effects by considering how they are actually taken up within a culture. The internal contradictions, tensions, and inconsistencies within ART and the way it is addressed within the law points to a dialectic that resists a simple reductivist understanding.
Parks
Jennifer
J
Loyola University, Department of Philosophy, Room 360, Crown Center, 6525 North Sheridan Road,Chicago, IL 60626, USA. jparks1@luc.edu
D003148:Communism; D003466:Cultural Characteristics; D034462:Dissent and Disputes; D005191:Family Characteristics; D019513:Feminism; D005610:Freedom; D006801:Humans; D011057:Politics; D011287:Prejudice; D046269:Reproductive Rights / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000523:psychology; D027724:Reproductive Techniques, Assisted / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence / Q000523:psychology; D012945:Social Values; D014481:United States; D014933:Women's Rights / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence