title: Use of standardized outcome measures in physical therapist practice: perceptions and applications.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Standardized instruments for measuring patients' activity limitations and participation restrictions have been advocated for use by rehabilitation professionals for many years. The available literature provides few recent reports of the use of these measures by physical therapists in the United States.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  The primary purpose of this study was to determine: (1) the extent of the use of standardized outcome measures and (2) perceptions regarding their benefits and barriers to their use. A secondary purpose was to examine factors associated with their use among physical therapists in clinical practice.
  
  
  METHODS
  The study used an observational design.
  
  
  METHODS
  A survey questionnaire comprising items regarding the use and perceived benefits and barriers of standardized outcome measures was sent to 1,000 randomly selected members of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA).
  
  
  RESULTS
  Forty-eight percent of participants used standardized outcome measures. The majority of participants (>90%) who used such measures believed that they enhanced communication with patients and helped direct the plan of care. The most frequently reported reasons for not using such measures included length of time for patients to complete them, length of time for clinicians to analyze the data, and difficulty for patients in completing them independently. Use of standardized outcome measures was related to specialty certification status, practice setting, and the age of the majority of patients treated.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The limitations included an unvalidated survey for data collection and a sample limited to APTA members.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Despite more than a decade of development and testing of standardized outcome measures appropriate for various conditions and practice settings, physical therapists have some distance to go in implementing their use routinely in most clinical settings. Based on the perceived barriers, alterations in practice management strategies and the instruments themselves may be necessary to increase their use.
authors.affiliation: Department of Rehabilitation and Movement Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA. jette@uvm.edu
authors.forename: Diane U
authors.initials: DU
authors.lastname: Jette
authors.forename: James
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Halbert
authors.forename: Courtney
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Iverson
authors.forename: Erin
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Miceli
authors.forename: Palak
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Shah
mesh_terms: D000203:Activities of Daily Living; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D005260:Female; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D007722:Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice; D006305:Health Status Indicators; D006801:Humans; D016015:Logistic Models; D008297:Male; D026741:Physical Therapy Modalities; D011788:Quality of Life; D012015:Reference Standards; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D014481:United States