To tell or not to tell: disclosure and the narrative self.
Drawing from a narrative identity framework, we present the results of three studies examining the nature of what people do and do not disclose about their life experiences. Across three studies, our findings indicate that (1) the major difference in what people do and do not disclose concerns the emotionality of the events and whether or not the events are transgressions; (2) for everyday memorable events, increased negative emotion is associated with greater likelihood of disclosure; but (3) for more important and/or longer retained events, increased negative and decreased positive emotion were associated with lower likelihoods of disclosure. We also found that socioemotional consequences are an important reason for nondisclosure of important past experiences and are predictably related to the extent to which events induce positive and negative emotions. Findings are considered in terms of their implications for narrative identity.
Pasupathi
Monisha
M
Department of Psychology, University of Utah, 390 S. 1530 E. 502, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. Pasupath@psych.utah.edu
McLean
Kate C
KC
Weeks
Trisha
T
D000328:Adult; D000739:Anecdotes as Topic; D003120:Colorado; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007389:Internal-External Control; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D008016:Life Change Events; D016014:Linear Models; D008297:Male; D009042:Motivation; D012649:Self Concept; D012650:Self Disclosure; D012931:Social Environment; D012933:Social Identification; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D055815:Young Adult