Computational model provides insight into the distinct responses of neurons to chemical and topographical cues.
Neuronal cell polarization (i.e., establishment of an axon) and axon guidance are mediated and controlled by mechanical and chemical signals from the environment. Unfortunately, an integrated approach to study cell-substrate interactions in a unified framework incorporating structural and chemical effects of the substrate has been lacking. In this paper, we present a new model combining experimental and computational methods to better understand the distinct behavior of E18 hippocampal neurons in response to topographical vs. immobilized chemical cues. We present results from our coarse-grain physiological computational model that correctly describes previously observed phenomena and predicts behavior that was subsequently tested through new experiments. The model differentiates topographical from chemical cues via a difference in cue spacing in these two substrates. Using the feature size spacing for topographical cues and a minimum step size, governed by the physics of filopodia protrusion, for chemical cues, the model successfully mimics the trend observed in experimental polarization probability for four different topographical feature sizes and constant chemical cue spacing. Our results not only show good agreement with experiments, but also provide novel suggestions for development of substrates for finer control of neuronal cell polarization.
Forciniti
Leandro
L
Department of Chemical Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Schmidt
Christine E
CE
Zaman
Muhammad H
MH
D000818:Animals; D001369:Axons / Q000502:physiology*; D002465:Cell Movement / Q000502:physiology*; D016764:Cell Polarity / Q000502:physiology*; D002478:Cells, Cultured; D003463:Cues; D008954:Models, Biological; D020932:Nerve Growth Factor / Q000502:physiology; D016501:Neurites / Q000502:physiology; D009474:Neurons / Q000502:physiology*; D051381:Rats
D020932:Nerve Growth Factor