title: Long-term wet and dry deposition of total and methyl mercury in the remote boreal ecoregion of Canada.
abstract: Although a positive relationship between atmospheric loadings of inorganic mercury (Hg(II)) to watersheds and concentrations of methyl mercury (MeHg) in fish has now been established, net wet and dry deposition of Hg(II) and MeHg to watersheds remains challenging to quantify. In this study, concentrations and loadings of total mercury (THg; all forms of Hg in a sample) and MeHg in open area wet deposition, throughfall, and litterfall were quantified atthe remote Experimental Lakes Area in the boreal ecoregion, NW Ontario, Canada. Between 1992 and 2006, mean annual THg and MeHg loadings in the open were 36 +/- 17 and 0.5 +/- 0.2 mg ha(-1), respectively. Throughfall THg and MeHg loadings were generally 2-4 times and 0.8-2 times higher, respectively, than loadings in the open. Loadings of both THg and MeHg were highest under an old growth spruce/fir canopy and lowest under a deciduous maple canopy, whereas loadings under young jack pine and wetland spruce/pine/alder canopies were intermediate. Litterfall generally represented the largest input of THg (86-105 mg ha(-1)) and MeHg (0.7-0.8 mg ha(-1)) to the landscape on an annual basis. Using the "direct" method of estimating dry deposition (thoughfall + litterfall - open loadings), we calculated that annual dry deposition of THg and MeHg under forest canopies ranged from 105 to 201 mg ha(-1), whereas dry deposition of MeHg ranged from 0.7 to 1.2 mg ha(-1). Photoreduction and emission of wet-deposited Hg(ll) from canopy foliage were accounted for, resulting in 3-5% (5-6 mg ha(-1)) higher annual estimates of dry deposition than via the direct method alone. NetTHg and MeHg loadings to this remote landscape were lower than at any other previously studied forested site globally. This study shows that THg and MeHg loading can be extremely variable within a heterogeneous boreal landscape and that processes such as Hg photoreduction and emission from foliage should be considered when estimating dry deposition of Hg.
authors.affiliation: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2E9. jgraydon@ualberta.ca
authors.forename: Jennifer A
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Graydon
authors.forename: Vincent L
authors.initials: VL
authors.lastname: St Louis
authors.forename: Holger
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Hintelmann
authors.forename: Steve E
authors.initials: SE
authors.lastname: Lindberg
authors.forename: Ken A
authors.initials: KA
authors.lastname: Sandilands
authors.forename: John W M
authors.initials: JW
authors.lastname: Rudd
authors.forename: Carol A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Kelly
authors.forename: Britt D
authors.initials: BD
authors.lastname: Hall
authors.forename: Linnea D
authors.initials: LD
authors.lastname: Mowat
mesh_terms: D000818:Animals; D017753:Ecosystem; D004784:Environmental Monitoring / Q000379:methods; D005618:Fresh Water; D006801:Humans; D008767:Methylmercury Compounds / Q000032:analysis*; D009864:Ontario; D014197:Trees; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical / Q000032:analysis*; D053833:Wetlands
chemical_list: D008767:Methylmercury Compounds; D014874:Water Pollutants, Chemical