Ethical hot spots of combined individual and group therapy: applying four ethical systems.
Abstract Combined therapy presents ethical quandaries that occur in individual psychotherapy and group psychotherapy, and dilemmas specifically associated with their integration. This paper examines two types of ethical frameworks (a classical principle-based framework and a set of context-based frameworks) for addressing the ethical hot spots of combined therapy: self-referral, transfer of information, and termination. The principle-based approach enables the practitioner to see what core values may be served or violated by different courses of action in combined therapy dilemmas. Yet, the therapist is more likely to do justice to the complexity and richness of the combined therapy situation by supplementing a principle analysis with three additional ethical frameworks. These approaches are: virtue ethics, feminist ethics, and casuistry. An analysis of three vignettes illustrates how these contrasting ethical models not only expand the range of features to which the therapist attends but also the array of solutions the therapist generates.
Brabender
Virginia M
VM
Institute for Graduate Clinical Psychology at Widener University, Chester, PA, USA. vmbrabender@widener.edu
Fallon
April
A
D003131:Combined Modality Therapy; D003219:Confidentiality; D005260:Female; D019513:Feminism; D006801:Humans; D018584:Physician Self-Referral; D013811:Psychotherapeutic Processes; D011613:Psychotherapy / Q000941:ethics* / Q000379:methods; D011615:Psychotherapy, Group / Q000941:ethics*; D028722:Virtues