Comparison of the biocompatibility of different root canal irrigants.
The purpose of this study was to compare the reaction of rat subcutaneous connective tissue to 0.9% sterile saline, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl), 5.25% NaOCl and 2% chlorhexidine gluconate solution or gel. Six circles were demarcated on the dorsal skin of 24 male Wistar rats, leaving 2 cm between each circle. Using a syringe, 0.1 mL of each root canal irrigant was injected subcutaneously into 5 circles. In the 6th circle, the needle of an empty syringe was introduced into the skin, but no irrigant was injected (control group). Evaluations were undertaken at 2 h, 48 h, 14 days and 30 days post-procedure. Tissue samples were excised, embedded in paraffin blocks and 3-microm-thick sections were obtained and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. The areas of inflammatory reaction were evaluated and analyzed statistically by ANOVA and Tukey's test. The control group showed few or no inflammatory reaction areas in the subcutaneous tissue. 0.9% saline solution, 2.0% chlorhexidine solution and 2.5% NaOCl showed a good biocompatibility, as very mild inflammatory reaction was detected at 14 days and tissue repair occurred at 30 days. 5.25% NaOCl was the most toxic irrigant, as the number of inflammatory cells remained elevated at 14 and 30 days. The group treated with 2.0% chlorhexidine gluconate gel presented a moderate inflammatory response at 14 days, which decreased at 30 days, being considered similar to that of the control group, 0.9% saline solution, 2.0% chlorhexidine solution and 2.5% NaOCl at this experimental period.
Gomes-Filho
João Eduardo
JE
Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School of Araçatuba, São Paulo State University, Araçatuba, SP, Brazil. joao@foa.unesp.br
Aurélio
Kamila Guilherme
KG
Costa
Mariana Machado Teixeira de Moraes
MM
Bernabé
Pedro Felício Estrada
PF
D000818:Animals; D001672:Biocompatible Materials / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000494:pharmacology*; D002481:Cellulitis / Q000139:chemically induced / Q000473:pathology; D002710:Chlorhexidine / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000031:analogs & derivatives / Q000494:pharmacology; D004396:Coloring Agents; D004804:Eosinophils / Q000473:pathology; D005782:Gels; D015726:Giant Cells / Q000473:pathology; D008214:Lymphocytes / Q000473:pathology; D008264:Macrophages / Q000473:pathology; D008297:Male; D009504:Neutrophils / Q000473:pathology; D051381:Rats; D017208:Rats, Wistar; D012388:Root Canal Irrigants / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000494:pharmacology*; D012965:Sodium Chloride; D012973:Sodium Hypochlorite / Q000008:administration & dosage / Q000494:pharmacology; D012996:Solutions; D040521:Subcutaneous Tissue / Q000187:drug effects / Q000473:pathology; D013997:Time Factors
D001672:Biocompatible Materials; D004396:Coloring Agents; D005782:Gels; D012388:Root Canal Irrigants; D012996:Solutions; D012965:Sodium Chloride; D012973:Sodium Hypochlorite; C010882:chlorhexidine gluconate; D002710:Chlorhexidine