Are the original and second edition of the California Verbal Learning Test equally accurate in detecting malingering?
This two-part study sought to determine the equivalence of the California Verbal Learning Tests (CVLT-1 and CVLT-2) in the detection of malingering in traumatic brain injury (TBI) and chronic pain. Part 1 compared a variety of scores from the two versions in carefully matched patient groups. Part 2 used criterion groups (known-groups) methodology to examine the relative rates of false positive (FP) errors across the two versions. Participants were 442 TBI (CVLT-1 = 310; CVLT-2 = 132) and 378 chronic pain patients (CVLT-1 = 250; CVLT-2 = 128). Overall, the CVLT-2 was more difficult than the CVLT-1, with the chronic pain patients showing larger version effects than the TBI patients. The two versions of the CVLT were equally accurate in detecting malingering in TBI and chronic pain. However, they were not interchangeable. The use of CVLT-1 cutoffs with the CVLT-2 may result in an increased risk of FP error. Appropriate cutoff adjustment in clinical practice is recommended.
Greve
Kevin W
KW
Department of Psychology, University of New Orleans-- Lakefront, New Orleans, LA 70148, USA. kgreve@uno.edu
Curtis
Kelly L
KL
Bianchini
Kevin J
KJ
Ord
Jonathan S
JS
D000328:Adult; D001924:Brain Concussion / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000523:psychology; D002908:Chronic Disease; D003072:Cognition Disorders / Q000175:diagnosis*; D004185:Disability Evaluation; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008306:Malingering / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000523:psychology; D011939:Mental Recall; D008875:Middle Aged; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D010146:Pain / Q000145:classification / Q000523:psychology*; D038223:Post-Concussion Syndrome / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000523:psychology; D011594:Psychometrics / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012372:ROC Curve; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012016:Reference Values; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D014706:Verbal Learning