title: Intermittent esotropia.
abstract: Not even half the number of the patients included in this study (N = 46) had been noticed as intermittent. Diplopia (N = 5) is not a reliable criterium. They need surgery with comparatively large amounts, on which behalf we prefer bi-medial rectus recessions. The prevailing result is "subnormal binocular vision," not to be confused with microtropia. Only four patients reached a cure, which means that they could not be differentiated from unaffected individuals any more.
authors.affiliation: University Kiel, Rendsburg, Germany. info@augenklinik-rd.de
authors.forename: Wilfried
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: de Decker
authors.forename: Erika
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: de Decker Dannheim
authors.forename: Ute
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Backheuer
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D002648:Child; D002675:Child, Preschool; D004172:Diplopia / Q000209:etiology; D004948:Esotropia / Q000150:complications / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000601:surgery*; D005500:Follow-Up Studies; D006801:Humans; D007223:Infant; D009801:Oculomotor Muscles / Q000601:surgery*; D011184:Postoperative Period; D012008:Recurrence; D012086:Reoperation; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D015348:Vision, Binocular; D015354:Vision, Low / Q000209:etiology / Q000503:physiopathology; D055815:Young Adult