title: Association of communication between hospital-based physicians and primary care providers with patient outcomes.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Patients admitted to general medicine inpatient services are increasingly cared for by hospital-based physicians rather than their primary care providers (PCPs). This separation of hospital and ambulatory care may result in important care discontinuities after discharge. We sought to determine whether communication between hospital-based physicians and PCPs influences patient outcomes.
  
  
  METHODS
  We approached consecutive patients admitted to general medicine services at six US academic centers from July 2001 to June 2003. A random sample of the PCPs for consented patients was contacted 2 weeks after patient discharge and surveyed about communication with the hospital medical team. Responses were linked with the 30-day composite patient outcomes of mortality, hospital readmission, and emergency department (ED) visits obtained through follow-up telephone survey and National Death Index search. We used hierarchical multi-variable logistic regression to model whether communication with the patient's PCP was associated with the 30-day composite outcome.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 1,772 PCPs for 2,336 patients were surveyed with 908 PCPs responses and complete patient follow-up available for 1,078 patients. The PCPs for 834 patients (77%) were aware that their patient had been admitted to the hospital. Of these, direct communication between PCPs and inpatient physicians took place for 194 patients (23%), and a discharge summary was available within 2 weeks of discharge for 347 patients (42%). Within 30 days of discharge, 233 (22%) patients died, were readmitted to the hospital, or visited an ED. In adjusted analyses, no relationship was seen between the composite outcome and direct physician communication (adjusted odds ratio 0.87, 95% confidence interval 0.56 - 1.34), the presence of a discharge summary (0.84, 95% CI 0.57-1.22), or PCP awareness of the index hospitalization (1.08, 95% CI 0.73-1.59).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Analysis of communication between PCPs and inpatient medical teams revealed much room for improvement. Although communication during handoffs of care is important, we were not able to find a relationship between several aspects of communication and associated adverse clinical outcomes in this multi-center patient sample.
authors.affiliation: Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. bellc@smh.toronto.on.ca
authors.forename: Chaim M
authors.initials: CM
authors.lastname: Bell
authors.forename: Jeffrey L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Schnipper
authors.forename: Andrew D
authors.initials: AD
authors.lastname: Auerbach
authors.forename: Peter J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Kaboli
authors.forename: Tosha B
authors.initials: TB
authors.lastname: Wetterneck
authors.forename: David V
authors.initials: DV
authors.lastname: Gonzales
authors.forename: Vineet M
authors.initials: VM
authors.lastname: Arora
authors.forename: James X
authors.initials: JX
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.forename: David O
authors.initials: DO
authors.lastname: Meltzer
mesh_terms: D000046:Academic Medical Centers; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D003142:Communication; D003266:Continuity of Patient Care; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003625:Data Collection; D005260:Female; D020445:Hospitalists; D006760:Hospitalization; D006801:Humans; D007396:Internship and Residency; D007400:Interprofessional Relations; D007407:Interviews as Topic; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010821:Physicians, Family