title: Diagnostic accuracy of computed tomography coronary angiography and evaluation of stress-only single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography hybrid imaging: comparison of prospective electrocardiogram-triggering vs. retrospective gating.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To determine diagnostic accuracy, effective radiation dose, and potential value of computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) for hybrid imaging with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) comparing prospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-triggering vs. retrospective ECG-gating.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Two hundred patients underwent standard myocardial stress/rest- SPECT perfusion imaging, which served as standard of reference. One hundred consecutive patients underwent 64-slice CTCA using prospective ECG-gating, and were compared with 100 patients who had previously undergone CTCA using retrospective ECG-gating. For predicting ischaemia, CTCA with prospective ECG-triggering and a stenosis cut-off >50% had a per-vessel sensitivity, specificity, negative, and positive predictive value of 100, 84, 100, and 30%; respective values for CTCA with retrospective ECG-gating were similar (P = n.s.): 86, 83, 98, and 33%. Combining CTCA with stress-only SPECT revealed 100% clinical agreement with regard to perfusion defects, and provided additional information in half the patients on preclinical coronary findings. Effective radiation dose was 2.2 +/- 0.7 mSv for CTCA with prospective ECG-triggering, and 19.7 +/- 4.2 mSv with retrospective ECG-gating (P < 0.001) (5.4 +/- 0.8 vs. 24.1 +/- 4.3 mSv for hybrid imaging).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Prospective ECG-triggering for CTCA reduces radiation dose by almost 90% without affecting diagnostic performance. Combined imaging with stress-only SPECT is an attractive alternative to standard stress/rest-SPECT for evaluation of coronary artery disease, offering additional information on preclinical atherosclerosis.
authors.affiliation: Cardiovascular Center, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
authors.forename: Lars
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Husmann
authors.forename: Bernhard A
authors.initials: BA
authors.lastname: Herzog
authors.forename: Oliver
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Gaemperli
authors.forename: Fuminari
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Tatsugami
authors.forename: Nina
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Burkhard
authors.forename: Ines
authors.initials: I
authors.lastname: Valenta
authors.forename: Patrick
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Veit-Haibach
authors.forename: Christophe A
authors.initials: CA
authors.lastname: Wyss
authors.forename: Ulf
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Landmesser
authors.forename: Philipp A
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: Kaufmann
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D017023:Coronary Angiography / Q000379:methods; D003324:Coronary Artery Disease / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging; D004562:Electrocardiography / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009943:Organophosphorus Compounds; D015609:Organotechnetium Compounds; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals; D012189:Retrospective Studies; D015899:Tomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photon / Q000379:methods; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods
chemical_list: D009943:Organophosphorus Compounds; D015609:Organotechnetium Compounds; D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals; C078700:technetium tc-99m tetrofosmin