[Therapeutic effects of magnetically labeled mononuclear and mesenchymal stem cells transplantation in a swine myocardial infarction model assessed by magnetic resonance imaging].
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the therapeutic effects of magnetically labeled mononuclear stem cells (MR-MNC) and mesenchymal stem cells (MR-MSC) transplantation in a swine acute myocardial infarction (AMI) model by MR imaging.


METHODS
AMI model was established in swines by balloon occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery, 10(7) autologous MR-MSC (n = 7), MR-MNC (n = 6) or PBS (n = 6) were delivered via intracoronary infusion within 1 week after AMI [(4.8 +/- 1.3) days]. Changes of infarct size and cardiac function were assessed with the use of 3.0T MR scanner before AMI, at 1 and 8 weeks post AMI.


RESULTS
Magnetically labeled stem cells could be identified in the region of AMI by cardiac MR imaging. Eight weeks post transplantation, infarct size was significantly reduced in MR-MSC transplantation group (8.5% +/- 0.5% vs. 24.7% +/- 3.1%, P < 0.05) and in MR-MNC transplantation (12.3% +/- 1.5% vs. 26.1% +/- 1.5%, P < 0.05) while infarct size remained unchanged in PBS group (P > 0.05) compared to values at 1 week post AMI, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was also significantly higher in MR-MSC transplantation group (56.9% +/- 1.3% vs. 40.7% +/- 2.0%, P < 0.05) and MR-MNC transplantation group (52.8% +/- 1.4% vs. 41.9% +/- 3.3%, P < 0.05) compared to LVEF at 1 week post AMI. LVEF increase was more significant in swines received MR-MSC transplantation than MR-MNC transplantation (16.2% +/- 1.2% vs. 10.9% +/- 3.0%, P < 0.05). Prussian blue staining identified stem cells in corresponding myocardial regions with as by MRI. Western blot analysis demonstrated that cardiac expressions of myosin heavy chain (MHC) in MR-MSC group (100.3 +/- 5.5) and in MR-MNCs group (95.5 +/- 4.2) were significantly higher than that in PBS group (75.7 +/- 5.7, P < 0.05), myocardial troponin T (cTNT) expression in MR-MSC group (124.0 +/- 5.8) and MR-MNC group (118.4 +/- 4.4) were also significantly higher than in PBS group (93.3 +/- 3.9, P < 0.05) while MMP2/TIMP1 ratios in MR-MSC group (0.6 +/- 0.1) and MR-MNC group (0.6 +/- 0.1) were significantly lower than that in PBS group (4.2 +/- 0.2, P < 0.05).


CONCLUSIONS
Magnetically labeled MR-MSC and MR-MNC homed to heart post myocardial infarction and reduced infarct size, improved cardiac function. MR-MSC is superior to MR-MNC on improving cardiac function.
Qi
Chun-mei
CM
Department of Cardiology, Zhong Da Hospital, Southeast University, Nanjing 210009, China.
Ma
Gen-shan
GS
Liu
Nai-feng
NF
Chen
Zhong
Z
Shen
Cheng-xing
CX
Liu
Xiao-Jun
XJ
Hu
Yao-peng
YP
Su
Ya-min
YM
Li
Xuan
X
Zhang
Xiao-li
XL
Teng
Gao-jun
GJ
Ju
Sheng-hong
SH
D000818:Animals; D004195:Disease Models, Animal; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging; D008297:Male; D045164:Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation; D009203:Myocardial Infarction / Q000628:therapy*; D013552:Swine; D013556:Swine, Miniature; D016896:Treatment Outcome