title: Can clinicians benefit from patient satisfaction surveys? Evaluating the NSF for Older People, 2005-2006.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  A transformation of healthcare is underway, from a sellers' market to a consumers' market, where the satisfaction of the patient's needs is part of the definition of quality. Patient satisfaction surveys are widely used to judge service quality, but clinicians are sceptical about them because they are too often poorly designed measures that do not lead to improvements in the quality of care.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  To explore the use of patient satisfaction survey data in identifying problems with the provision of inpatient care for older people.
  
  
  METHODS
  A case study using secondary analysis of postal survey data about older people's experiences of health and social care services, obtained during the evaluation of the National Service Framework for Older People in 2005-2006. The survey asked about experiences of inpatient care and of discharge from hospital, and sought perceptions of the avoidability of the admission.
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 4170 people aged 50 years and over returned a postal questionnaire in six local authority areas of England. Responses from 584 who had experienced a recent overnight stay in hospital are reported and discussed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  The response rate was 35%, ranging from 26% to 44% in the six areas surveyed. The great majority of those who had recent direct experience of inpatient care reported that they had been engaged in decision-making, that staff promoted their independence and maintained their dignity. There were widespread examples, however, of the opposite experiences. Discharge from hospital was problematic for about one-third of survey respondents with this experience, and there were different accounts of poorly managed discharges from all areas.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Case studies using local survey data can be used as formative assessments of services. The response rate to the survey and the likelihood of responder bias mean that patient satisfaction survey data of this sort cannot be used to judge or compare services in a summative way, but can highlight areas where remedial action is needed. Small-scale local surveys may seem to lack the robustness of larger studies, but do identify similar areas of concern. Commissioners and clinicians could use the findings of such surveys to inform dialogues about the quality of hospital care for older people.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Ageing Population Studies, Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, Royal Free Campus Rowland Hill Street, London, UK. s.iliffe@pcps.ucl.ac.uk
authors.forename: Steve
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Lliffe
authors.forename: Jane
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Wilcock
authors.forename: Jill
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Manthorpe
authors.forename: Jo
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Moriarty
authors.forename: Michelle
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Cornes
authors.forename: Roger
authors.initials: R
authors.lastname: Clough
authors.forename: Les
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Bright
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D003695:Delivery of Health Care; D005260:Female; D006299:Health Services for the Aged / Q000592:standards*; D006306:Health Surveys; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D017060:Patient Satisfaction; D006113:United Kingdom