title: Perceptions and competence in evidence-based medicine: a survey of the American Urological Association Membership.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  We investigated the attitudes and opinions of urologists toward evidence-based medicine to help guide future efforts of the American Urological Association and other organizations vested in the education and training of urologists.
  
  
  METHODS
  From August to November 2006 we performed a mail survey of a random sample of 2,000 members of the American Urological Association. Questions in the survey addressed the role of evidence-based medicine in urology, participants' self-assessed understanding of evidence-based medicine related terminology, their familiarity with and use of web based evidence-based medicine resources, as well as their evidence-based medicine competence based on their understanding of core concepts such as randomization and blinding.
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 889 respondents completed the survey resulting in a response rate of 45%. There was widespread agreement that practicing evidence-based medicine improves patient care (median score 8; IQR 7, 10) and that every urologist should be familiar with critical appraisal techniques (median score 9; IQR 8, 10). The percentage of respondents who indicated that they "understand and could explain to others" the terms number needed to treat, power and level of evidence was 42%, 29% and 18%, respectively. The American Urological Association Guidelines were used regularly by 35% and on occasion by 51% of respondents. Of the participants 44% were unaware of the PubMed(R) search engine and only 14% used it regularly, while 76% were unaware of the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and only 8% had ever used it. The mean evidence-based medicine competence score for all respondents was 67.2% +/- 17.0%.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The findings of this survey confirm that urologists have a favorable attitude toward evidence-based medicine. However, understanding of evidence-based medicine terminology, concepts and use of related resources among American Urological Association members leaves room for improvement. Increased efforts to promote an understanding of evidence-based medicine through workshops, publications and web based resources specifically for a urological audience appear indicated.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, University of Florida, College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida 32610-0247, USA. p.dahm@urology.ufl.edu
authors.forename: Philipp
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Dahm
authors.forename: Rudolf W
authors.initials: RW
authors.lastname: Poolman
authors.forename: Mohit
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Bhandari
authors.forename: Susan F
authors.initials: SF
authors.lastname: Fesperman
authors.forename: Jan
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Baum
authors.forename: Beth
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Kosiak
authors.forename: Todd
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Carrick
authors.forename: Glenn M
authors.initials: GM
authors.lastname: Preminger
mesh_terms: D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D002983:Clinical Competence; D032802:Committee Membership; D004502:Education, Medical, Continuing; D019317:Evidence-Based Medicine; D005260:Female; D019538:Health Care Surveys; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000592:standards / Q000639:trends; D012955:Societies, Medical; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014481:United States; D014572:Urology / Q000193:education / Q000592:standards*