On the vicissitudes of combining individual and group psychotherapy.
Abstract Reviewing a series of articles in this special issue on combined treatment incorporating individual and group therapy, and in one instance couples therapy and a relationship group, the author provides a synoptic history of combined treatment, noting that the relational perspectives of psychoanalysis and systems theories of groups now provide conceptual frameworks for combined therapies. Taking up each article in turn, he considers that combined treatment poses particular problems while having certain advantages. He discusses the theoretical emphases and biases of each article, whether relational psychology, classical psychoanalysis, object relations theory, or self-psychology. He considers the roles of transference and countertransference, patient-therapist enactments, empathic attunement, "surrogate therapy" by the group members, and ethics in determining outcomes. In addition, the author notes how so-called difficult or regressed patients impact upon and are affected by the use of combined therapy modalities.
Schermer
Victor L
VL
Private Practice and clinic settings in Philadelphia, PA, USA. VLScher@voicenet.com
D003131:Combined Modality Therapy; D019546:Couples Therapy / Q000379:methods; D004992:Ethics, Medical; D006126:Group Processes; D006801:Humans; D011572:Psychoanalysis; D013811:Psychotherapeutic Processes; D011613:Psychotherapy / Q000941:ethics / Q000379:methods*; D011615:Psychotherapy, Group / Q000941:ethics; D012650:Self Disclosure; D012752:Shame; D013313:Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic / Q000628:therapy; D014167:Transference, Psychology