title: [Compare of laparoscopic and open surgery for radical cystectomy with orthotopic ileal neobladder].
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To compare the clinical therapeutic effect and complications of laparoscopic radical cystectomy with orthotopic ileal neobladder (LRC-INB) with open radical cystectomy with orthotopic ileal neobladder (ORC-INB).
  
  
  METHODS
  A total of 171 patients were evaluated, including 63 cases with ORC-INB and 108 cases with LRC-INB from June 1994 to May 2007 at our institution. The parameters analyzed included perioperative data, postoperative complications, new bladder function and effect of tumor control.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There was no significant difference in demographic characteristics of patients between these 2 groups. The mean operating time was 330 min in the LRC group and 310 min in the ORC group (P > 0.05). The mean blood loss was 320 ml in the LRC group and 1100 ml in ORC group (P < 0.001). The mean oral intake after operation was 2.4 days for LRC group and 4.5 days for ORC group (P < 0.001). No perioperative death was occurred in both groups. The complication rate was 18.5% in LRC group, while 30.0% in ORC group (P < 0.05). Twelve months after operation, the day-time and night-time continence rate were 90.7% and 82.6% for the LRC group, 88.3% and 81.6% for the ORC group respectively (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference of VOL, pressure and residual urine volume (RUV) of neobladder between these 2 groups. Surgical margin were tumor free for 107 cases except one T4 case in laparoscopic group had positive margin (P > 0.05). The mean number of removed lymph node were 12 and 8 in LRC and ORC group respectively (P < 0.05). The 2 years tumor free survival rate of the same stage or grade was no significant different (P > 0.05).
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  LCR had advantages of less blood loss, shorter oral intake time, less postoperative complications, comparable continent rate and short-term tumor control with ORC. Long-term follow up is needed to confirm the oncological outcome.
authors.affiliation: Department of Urology, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510120, China. yehjn@yahoo.com.cn
authors.forename: Jian
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Huang
authors.forename: Hai
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Huang
authors.forename: Tian-xin
authors.initials: TX
authors.lastname: Lin
authors.forename: Ke-wei
authors.initials: KW
authors.lastname: Xu
authors.forename: Cai-xia
authors.initials: CX
authors.lastname: Zhang
authors.forename: Zheng-hui
authors.initials: ZH
authors.lastname: Guo
authors.forename: Chun
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Jiang
authors.forename: Xin-bao
authors.initials: XB
authors.lastname: Yin
authors.forename: Jin-li
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Han
authors.forename: You-sheng
authors.initials: YS
authors.lastname: Yao
authors.forename: Wen-lian
authors.initials: WL
authors.lastname: Xie
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D015653:Cystectomy / Q000379:methods*; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007082:Ileum / Q000601:surgery; D010535:Laparoscopy; D007813:Laparotomy; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D016896:Treatment Outcome; D001749:Urinary Bladder Neoplasms / Q000601:surgery*; D014547:Urinary Diversion / Q000379:methods*