Attitudes towards priority-setting and rationing in healthcare -- an exploratory survey of Swedish medical students.
BACKGROUND
Healthcare priority-setting is inextricably linked to the challenge of providing publicly funded healthcare within a limited budget, which may result in difficult and potentially controversial rationing decisions. Despite priority-setting's increasing prominence in policy and academic discussion, it is still unclear what the level of understanding and acceptance of priority-setting is at different levels of health care.


OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study is threefold. First we wish to explore the level of familiarity with different aspects of priority-setting among graduating medical students. Secondly, to gauge their acceptance of both established and proposed Swedish priority-setting principles. Finally to elucidate their attitudes towards healthcare rationing and the role of different actors in decision making, with a particular interest in comparing the attitudes of medical students with data from the literature examining the attitudes among primary care patients in Sweden.


METHODS
A cross-sectional survey containing 14 multiple choice items about priority-setting in healthcare was distributed to the graduating medical class at Linkoöping University. The response rate was 92% (43/47).


RESULTS
Less than half of respondents have encountered the notion of open priority-setting, and the majority believed it to be somewhat or very unclear. There is a high degree of awareness and agreement with the established ethical principles for priority-setting in Swedish health care; however respondents are inconsistent in their application of the cost-effectiveness principle. A larger proportion of respondents were more favourable to physicians and other health personnel being responsible for rationing decisions as opposed to politicians.


CONCLUSIONS
Future discussion about priority-setting in medical education should be contextualized within an explicit and open process. There is a need to adequately clarify the role of the cost-effectiveness principle in priority-setting. Medical students seem to acknowledge the need for rationing in healthcare to a greater extent when compared with previous results from Swedish primary care patients.
Omar
Faisal
F
Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden. faisal.omar@liu.se
Tinghög
Gustav
G
Tinghög
Petter
P
Carlsson
Per
P
D001291:Attitude of Health Personnel; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003657:Decision Making; D004501:Education, Medical; D005260:Female; D015276:Health Care Rationing / Q000191:economics / Q000941:ethics; D006291:Health Policy / Q000191:economics; D006292:Health Priorities / Q000191:economics / Q000941:ethics; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000191:economics / Q000941:ethics; D013337:Students, Medical / Q000523:psychology; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D013548:Sweden