title: The financial dimension of integrated behavioral/primary care.
abstract: There are two reasons why mental health, now more appropriately termed behavioral healthcare, is declining: (a) a lack of understanding among psychotherapists of healthcare economics, particularly the intricacies of medical cost offset, and (b) our failure as a profession to see the importance of behavioral interventions as an integral part of the healthcare system inasmuch as the nation pays for healthcare, not psychosocial care. This paper will briefly describe the rapid changes in the economics of healthcare during the past 75 years, including the post World War II enthusiastic espousal of psychotherapy by the American public which was followed by a precipitous decline as our outcomes research in behavioral care remained ignorant of financial outcomes, leaving it to the government and managed care to arbitrarily curtail escalating mental health costs. At the present time psychology is on the cusp of becoming part of the healthcare system through integrated behavioral/primary care, renewing the primacy of financial considerations such as return on investment (ROI) and medical cost offset, as well as an urgency that we avoid the mistakes that are emerging in some flawed implementations of integrated care.
authors.affiliation: University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA. CummFound@aol.com
authors.forename: Nicholas A
authors.initials: NA
authors.lastname: Cummings
authors.forename: William T
authors.initials: WT
authors.lastname: O'Donohue
authors.forename: Janet L
authors.initials: JL
authors.lastname: Cummings
mesh_terms: D001524:Behavioral Medicine / Q000191:economics*; D019033:Delivery of Health Care, Integrated / Q000191:economics* / Q000266:history; D017048:Health Care Costs; D049673:History, 20th Century; D049674:History, 21st Century; D006801:Humans; D011320:Primary Health Care / Q000191:economics*; D011584:Psychology; D014481:United States