title: Cost-effectiveness of MRI compared to mammography for breast cancer screening in a high risk population.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a sensitive method of breast imaging virtually uninfluenced by breast density. Because of the improved sensitivity, breast MRI is increasingly being used for detection of breast cancer among high risk young women. However, the specificity of breast MRI is variable and costs are high. The purpose of this study was to determine if breast MRI is a cost-effective approach for the detection of breast cancer among young women at high risk.
  
  
  METHODS
  A Markov model was created to compare annual breast cancer screening over 25 years with either breast MRI or mammography among young women at high risk. Data from published studies provided probabilities for the model including sensitivity and specificity of each screening strategy. Costs were based on Medicare reimbursement rates for hospital and physician services while medication costs were obtained from the Federal Supply Scale. Utilities from the literature were applied to each health outcome in the model including a disutility for the temporary health state following breast biopsy for a false positive test result. All costs and benefits were discounted at 5% per year. The analysis was performed from the payer perspective with results reported in 2006 U.S. dollars. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses addressed uncertainty in all model parameters.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Breast MRI provided 14.1 discounted quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) at a discounted cost of $18,167 while mammography provided 14.0 QALYs at a cost of $4,760 over 25 years of screening. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of breast MRI compared to mammography was $179,599/QALY. In univariate analysis, breast MRI screening became < $50,000/QALY when the cost of the MRI was < $315. In the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, MRI screening produced a net health benefit of -0.202 QALYs (95% central range: -0.767 QALYs to +0.439 QALYs) compared to mammography at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY. Breast MRI screening was superior in 0%, < $50,000/QALY in 22%, > $50,000/QALY in 34%, and inferior in 44% of trials.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Although breast MRI may provide health benefits when compared to mammographic screening for some high risk women, it does not appear to be cost-effective even at willingness to pay thresholds above $120,000/QALY.
authors.affiliation: Department of Hematology and Oncology, School of Medicine, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, USA. smoore@gmail.com
authors.forename: Susan G
authors.initials: SG
authors.lastname: Moore
authors.forename: Pareen J
authors.initials: PJ
authors.lastname: Shenoy
authors.forename: Laura
authors.initials: L
authors.lastname: Fanucchi
authors.forename: John W
authors.initials: JW
authors.lastname: Tumeh
authors.forename: Christopher R
authors.initials: CR
authors.lastname: Flowers
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis*; D003362:Cost-Benefit Analysis; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008279:Magnetic Resonance Imaging / Q000191:economics*; D008327:Mammography / Q000191:economics*; D008390:Markov Chains; D008403:Mass Screening / Q000191:economics*; D008875:Middle Aged