[Resource allocation analysis for international cooperation program for HIV/AIDS prevention and control].
OBJECTIVE
To provide evidence for resource allocation and cooperation between domestic and international HIV/AIDS programs in China by analyzing the needs and current levels of resource input in provinces.


METHODS
National and provincial international cooperation program investment and allocation data from 2000 to 2006 were collected. Several factors in each province were analyzed through multiple regression analysis in order to determine whether they had a statistical correlation to the distribution of international HIV/AIDS program resources in China, including: the Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the number of accumulated people living with HIV/AIDS, and the number of accumulated people living with AIDS. Then the Z values were calculated at each provincial level and compared with related international investment. The resource allocation in different program areas were compared with the level of resource input by international and central government HIV/AIDS prevention and control programs through Chi-square test.


RESULTS
The international cooperation program investment at local level from 2000 to 2006 were 4893, 24 669, 50 567, 52 950, 112 143, 363 396 and 247 045 thousand RMB respectively, and at national level were 3007, 19 726, 29 035, 37 530, 77 500, 105 786 and 77 035 thousand RMB respectively. There was a statistical correlation between international HIV/AIDS program resource input and the accumulated number of people living with AIDS (R is 0.56 and 0.69 accordingly, and P < 0.01 both). However, there was no statistical correlation between international resource input and the GDP of each province. International HIV/AIDS cooperation programs did not invest in each province according to its practical needs (R = 0.066, P = 0.725). The international cooperation program investments and needs in different province could not meet completely. The ranks of Z value in Guangdong, Shandong and Jiangsu were 3, 5 and 6, but the ranks of international cooperation program in those provinces were 18, 13 and 28 respectively. The investment proportion for national investment in surveillance and testing, advocacy education and intervention, care and support, and others were 22.4%, 19.7%, 36.8% and 21.1% respectively in 2005, and for international cooperation program were 11.5%, 20.8%, 10.4% and 57.4%. For national investment in 2006 were 18.6%, 23.8%, 32.6% and 25.0%, and international cooperation program were 14.0%, 34.3%, 17.1% and 34.6% respectively. The Chinese government and international programs therefore had different priorities in 2005 (chi(2) = 35.09, P < 0.01) and 2006 (chi(2) = 9.26, P = 0.026).


CONCLUSIONS
International HIV/AIDS cooperation programs should be better integrated with national programs and combined with epidemic situation and GDP to decide the amount and areas of the investment in order to ensure that they supplement Chinese HIV/AIDS prevention and control activities effectively. The advantages that can be gained from technical support provided by international programs should be further emphasized in line with China's HIV/AIDS prevention and control priorities.
Li
Hui
H
National Center for STD/AIDS Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 100050, China.
Xue
Hui
H
Liu
Hui
H
Guo
Hao-yan
HY
Zhang
Hua
H
Sun
Jiang-ping
JP
D000163:Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome / Q000191:economics* / Q000517:prevention & control; D002681:China; D006801:Humans; D007391:International Cooperation; D040841:Resource Allocation