Scar assessment scales: a dermatologic overview.
BACKGROUND
This overview critically compares subjective assessment tools and available objective measurement tools with potential devices becoming available. Our goal is to lay out the benefits of each scar assessment scale in order to propose good management skills for scars along with strong metric skills.


METHODS
Classifying a scar is important in daily clinical practice. Ultimately choosing which treatment modality best fits can become a challenge. Scar classification needs a more detailed and systematic approach. We researched all different factors contributing to scar formation to come up with a more detailed criteria. Such factors included pigmentation/vascularity, surface texture, surface area, thickness (scar height), and pliability.


RESULTS
Few studies have assessed scars; each provided an assessment scale of their own. Each scale is compared on the basis of accuracy, reliability, convenience in terms of feasibility and price.


CONCLUSIONS
There remains still no ideal objective measurement out there despite promise seen in subjective evaluation. Method refinement will however accelerate our knowledge and interventions - based on increasing study power with enhanced metrics.
Idriss
Nayla
N
Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Maibach
Howard I
HI
D002921:Cicatrix / Q000145:classification* / Q000175:diagnosis*; D003124:Colorimetry / Q000379:methods*; D046169:Dermoscopy / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D007090:Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted / Q000379:methods*; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D012720:Severity of Illness Index; D012882:Skin Tests / Q000379:methods*