[Dignity or integrity - does the genetic modification of animals require new concepts in animal ethics?].
Animal genetic engineering seems to point at a normative gap beyond pathocentric welfare theories in animal ethics. Recently developed approaches aim to bridge this gap by means of new normative criteria such as animal dignity and animal integrity. The following comparison of dignity and integrity in the context of animal ethics shows that the dignity concept faces serious problems because of its necessarily anthroporelational character and the different functions of contingent and inherent dignity within ethical reasoning. Unlike animal dignity the concept of animal integrity could prove to be a useful enhancement for pathocentric approaches.
Schmidt
Kirsten
K
Institute for Philosophy, Ruhr-University Bochum, Germany. kirsten.schmidt@ruhr-uni-bochum.de
D017087:Animal Rights; D000827:Animal Welfare / Q000941:ethics; D000818:Animals; D030801:Animals, Genetically Modified; D005818:Genetic Engineering / Q000941:ethics*