Events per person-time (incidence rate): a misleading statistic?
Results in risk studies based on events per person-time (EPT, technically 'incidence rate') often prove non-confirmable. The circumstances in which the EPT-ratio is unquestionably both valid and optimal to compare a high- and low-risk group, a constant hazards situation, are discussed. However, the constant hazards situation seldom applies in medical research. When the constant hazards situation does not apply, even under optimal circumstances, with fixed entry time and follow-up time for all those not experiencing the event and absence of censoring, EPT-ratio yields at best ambiguous, at worst misleading, results. More careful design and survival analyses are recommended in place of use of EPTs.
Kraemer
Helena Chmura
HC
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 943305, USA. hckhome@pacbell.net
D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D015982:Bias; D001699:Biometry; D005260:Female; D020249:Hormone Replacement Therapy / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D008875:Middle Aged; D016017:Odds Ratio; D016016:Proportional Hazards Models; D016032:Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / Q000706:statistics & numerical data