National and global agendas on violence against women: historical perspective and consensus.
A policy analysis of 11 national and global institutions' violence against women agendas spanning 1990 to 2006 is presented. Analysis revealed 85 distinct recommendations. The highest percentages of them referenced prevention (29%); data, design, and measurement (21%); and psychotherapy and support (19%). Consensus (percentage of recommendations for future activities included in four or more agendas) was highest for advocacy (75%), funding (50%), prevention (48%), and data, design, and measurement (44%). Changes in emphasis over time, aims that have been abandoned, and observations contrasting U.S. and global agendas are also examined. The results create a context to inform the agendas currently in development within psychology, criminal justice, medicine, nursing, public health, and other disciplines. Next steps to guide future policy work include investigation of advocates', practitioners', researchers', and policymakers' perceived progress in implementing existing recommendations, empirical cataloguing of achievements that demonstrate progress toward aims, constituent input on reprioritization of activities, and contemporizing action steps.
Koss
Mary P
MP
Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson, 85724, USA. mpk@email.arizona.edu
White
Jacquelyn W
JW
D018585:Battered Women / Q000266:history* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D005260:Female; D006291:Health Policy; D049673:History, 20th Century; D049674:History, 21st Century; D006801:Humans; D011613:Psychotherapy / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D011902:Rape / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D012944:Social Support; D014481:United States / Q000453:epidemiology; D014754:Violence / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D016387:Women's Health / Q000266:history