Public ideas and values concerning the commercialization of organ donation in four European countries.
Against the background of the increasing academic and political debate on financial incentives for organ donation, we conducted a qualitative investigation on the conditions under which European citizens would actually consider or refuse financial incentives for organ donation. Our paper combines an analysis of data that were collected in eight Focus Group discussions on transplantation medicine with lay people and patients from four European countries (Cyprus, Germany, the Netherlands, and Sweden) with a critical re-assessment of the dichotomy between gift and commodity in the recent political and academic discourse. We find that the distinction between living and post mortem donation on the one hand, and between different models of financial incentives on the other, plays a crucial role for the participants' values and ideas about organ donation. We discuss the significance of our results with particular respect to the central role of reciprocity and draw conclusions for the bioethical and biopolitical debate.
Schweda
Mark
M
University of Goettingen, Department of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine, Humboldtallee 36, 37073 Goettingen, Germany. mark.schweda@medizin.uni-goettingen.de
Schicktanz
Silke
S
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000533:Altruism; D003132:Commerce; D004493:Education; D005060:Europe; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011639:Public Opinion; D012067:Religion; D009927:Tissue and Organ Procurement / Q000191:economics* / Q000379:methods*; D055815:Young Adult