title: "...because I am something special" or "I think I will be something like a guinea pig": information and assent of legal minors in clinical trials--assessment of understanding, appreciation and reasoning.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  The aim of this study is to assess and evaluate the capacities for understanding, appreciation and reasoning of legal minors with psychiatric disorders and their parents and their competence to consent or assent to participation in clinical trials. The beliefs, fears, motivation and influencing factors for decision-making of legal minors and parents were also examined.
  
  
  METHODS
  Using the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Clinical Research (MacCAT-CR), an instrument developed for adults whose capacities to consent are unclear, we provided information about clinical trials and assessed understanding, appreciation and reasoning. We adapted this tool for legal minors and examined 19 children and adolescents between the ages of 7 and 15 with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) or ADHD combined with oppositional defiant disorder (DSM-IV 314.00/314.01/312.8) enrolled in clinical trials. Parents were also examined using the MacCAT-CR.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Facts such as the procedures involved in trials or their duration were well understood by legal minors, but more abstract issues like the primary purpose of the trial were not understood by children and adolescents or by many parents. Legal minors also had difficulties understanding the nature of placebo and the probability of receiving placebo. Children's and adolescents' decisions were influenced by fears about their disorder worsening and by problems in their relationship with their parents. Parents wanted the best therapy for their children in order to minimize problems in school.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Legal minors and parents need to be informed more precisely about specific issues like placebo and the primary purpose of trials. In general, the reasoning of children and adolescents was influenced by their experience with their disorder and decision making was based on reasonable arguments. Their fears were based on everyday experiences such as school performance or family relationships.
authors.affiliation: Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry/Psychotherapy, University Hospital of Ulm, Ulm, Germany. michael.koelch@uniklinik-ulm.de
authors.forename: Michael
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Koelch
authors.forename: Hanneke
authors.initials: H
authors.lastname: Singer
authors.forename: Anja
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Prestel
authors.forename: Jessica
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Burkert
authors.forename: Ulrike
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Schulze
authors.forename: Jörg M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Fegert