title: Evidence regarding clinical use of microvolt T-wave alternans.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Microvolt T-wave alternans (MTWA) testing in many studies has proven to be a highly accurate predictor of ventricular tachyarrhythmic events (VTEs) in patients with risk factors for sudden cardiac death (SCD) but without a prior history of sustained VTEs (primary prevention patients). In some recent studies involving primary prevention patients with prophylactically implanted cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs), MTWA has not performed as well.
  
  
  OBJECTIVE
  This study examined the hypothesis that MTWA is an accurate predictor of VTEs in primary prevention patients without implanted ICDs, but not of appropriate ICD therapy in such patients with implanted ICDs.
  
  
  METHODS
  This study identified prospective clinical trials evaluating MTWA measured using the spectral analytic method in primary prevention populations and analyzed studies in which: (1) few patients had implanted ICDs and as a result none or a small fraction (< or =15%) of the reported end point VTEs were appropriate ICD therapies (low ICD group), or (2) many of the patients had implanted ICDs and the majority of the reported end point VTEs were appropriate ICD therapies (high ICD group).
  
  
  RESULTS
  In the low ICD group comprising 3,682 patients, the hazard ratio associated with a nonnegative versus negative MTWA test was 13.6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.5 to 30.4) and the annual event rate among the MTWA-negative patients was 0.3% (95% CI: 0.1% to 0.5%). In contrast, in the high ICD group comprising 2,234 patients, the hazard ratio was only 1.6 (95% CI: 1.2 to 2.1) and the annual event rate among the MTWA-negative patients was elevated to 5.4% (95% CI: 4.1% to 6.7%). In support of these findings, we analyzed published data from the Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Trial II (MADIT II) and Sudden Cardiac Death in Heart Failure Trial (SCD-HeFT) trials and determined that in those trials only 32% of patients who received appropriate ICD therapy averted an SCD.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  This study found that MTWA testing using the spectral analytic method provides an accurate means of predicting VTEs in primary prevention patients without implanted ICDs; in particular, the event rate is very low among such patients with a negative MTWA test. In prospective trials of ICD therapy, the number of patients receiving appropriate ICD therapy greatly exceeds the number of patients who avert SCD as a result of ICD therapy. In trials involving patients with implanted ICDs, these excess appropriate ICD therapies seem to distribute randomly between MTWA-negative and MTWA-nonnegative patients, obscuring the predictive accuracy of MTWA for SCD. Appropriate ICD therapy is an unreliable surrogate end point for SCD.
authors.affiliation: Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, J W Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. Hohnloser@em.uni-frankfurt.de
authors.forename: Stefan H
authors.initials: SH
authors.lastname: Hohnloser
authors.forename: Takanori
authors.initials: T
authors.lastname: Ikeda
authors.forename: Richard J
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Cohen
mesh_terms: D016001:Confidence Intervals; D016757:Death, Sudden, Cardiac / Q000473:pathology / Q000517:prevention & control*; D017147:Defibrillators, Implantable; D004562:Electrocardiography; D006801:Humans; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D011322:Primary Prevention; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012307:Risk Factors; D017180:Tachycardia, Ventricular / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000401:mortality / Q000503:physiopathology; D014693:Ventricular Fibrillation / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000401:mortality / Q000503:physiopathology