title: The haphazard approach to the early detection of asymptomatic renal cancer: results from a contemporary executive health programme.
abstract: OBJECTIVE To compare the detection of asymptomatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in an executive health programme (EHP) that uses traditional methods of screening (history, physical examination and urine analysis) to programmes that screen by renal imaging. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed case records from patients undergoing executive health examinations at Mayo Clinic between 1 January 2002 and 30 September 2007. Results Of 32 310 patients, 18 RCCs were detected; of these, 13 (72%) were detected by the EHP and five (28%) were missed by the initial EHP screening process but subsequently discovered within 4-24 months. Of the 13 detected through the EHP, eight were discovered incidentally, two because of symptoms, and three because of asymptomatic microscopic haematuria (AMH). Of the 13, 12 were classified as early-stage cancers (Stage I). By contrast, of the five cancers missed by the EHP screening process, two were diagnosed because of the development of symptoms and only one was classified as Stage I. To date, two of these patients whose cancers were undetected by the EHP developed metastasis and one of them has died. Both had been followed in the EHP for years and neither had MH in multiple specimens. CONCLUSION Our EHP follows standard policy and relies on a history, physical examination and urine analysis to decide who to evaluate for asymptomatic RCC. This practice missed >70% of the potentially diagnosable cancers. The patients with RCCs that were discovered initially by the EHP fared better than those whose diagnosis was delayed. Our detection rate of four per 10 000 was only a fraction of those reported by programmes using imaging as a screening tool. The logic behind our current approach to the early detection of asymptomatic RCC needs to be reassessed. AMH is coincidental in most cases and patients could forego imaging if they are unsuitable candidates for screening. However, AMH will miss most treatable cancers and is not an appropriate screening test for an early detection programme. In the absence of reliable biomarkers, renal imaging should be the primary screening tool for detecting asymptomatic RCC in informed, clinically suitable individuals enrolled in an early detection programme.
authors.affiliation: Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ. Feldstein.Murray@Mayo.edu
authors.forename: Murray S
authors.initials: MS
authors.lastname: Feldstein
authors.forename: Deborah J
authors.initials: DJ
authors.lastname: Rhodes
authors.forename: Alex S
authors.initials: AS
authors.lastname: Parker
authors.forename: Robert R
authors.initials: RR
authors.lastname: Orford
authors.forename: Erik P
authors.initials: EP
authors.lastname: Castle
mesh_terms: D000368:Aged; D002292:Carcinoma, Renal Cell / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000556:secondary; D055088:Early Detection of Cancer; D005260:Female; D006417:Hematuria / Q000209:etiology; D006801:Humans; D007680:Kidney Neoplasms / Q000175:diagnosis*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D015397:Program Evaluation; D011787:Quality of Health Care / Q000592:standards*; D012189:Retrospective Studies