Progressive ratio schedules of reinforcement.
Pigeons' pecks produced grain under progressive ratio (PR) schedules, whose response requirements increased systematically within sessions. Experiment 1 compared arithmetic (AP) and geometric (GP) progressions. Response rates increased as a function of the component ratio requirement, then decreased linearly (AP) or asymptotically (GP). Experiment 2 found the linear decrease in AP rates to be relatively independent of step size. Experiment 3 showed pausing to be controlled by the prior component length, which predicted the differences between PR and regressive ratio schedules found in Experiment 4. When the longest component ratios were signaled by different key colors, rates at moderate ratios increased, demonstrating control by forthcoming context. Models for response rate and pause duration based on Bizo and Killeen (1997) described performance on AP schedules; GP schedules required an additional parameter representing the contextual reinforcement.
Killeen
Peter R
PR
Department of Psychology, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-1104, USA. Killeen@asu.edu
Posadas-Sanchez
Diana
D
Johansen
Espen Borgå
EB
Thrailkill
Eric A
EA
D000818:Animals; D001522:Behavior, Animal; D010856:Columbidae; D008297:Male; D008960:Models, Psychological; D011930:Reaction Time; D012055:Reinforcement Schedule