Slot-scan digital radiography of the lower extremities: a comparison to computed radiography with respect to image quality and radiation dose.
OBJECTIVE
To compare the slot-scan digital radiography (SSDR) of the lower extremity region and the computed radiography (CR) method with respect to the image quality and radiation exposure.


METHODS
We enrolled 54 patients who underwent both the SSDR and CR of the lower extremities. The study evaluated and statistically compared the image quality of four features (outer cortex, inner cortex, trabeculae and intermuscular fat) at six different levels (pelvis, hip, femur, knee, tibia and ankle) between each method. The image quality was evaluated using a visibility scale, and the entrance skin dose was measured using a dosimeter at three different levels of a phantom (hip, knee, and ankle).


RESULTS
The mean image visibility scale values for the SSDR method were significantly higher than for the CR method. The entrance skin dose for the SSDR method was 278 microGy at each level, compared to the entrance skin doses of the CR method, which were 3,410 microGy for the hip, 1,152 microGy for the knee, and 580 microGy for the ankle.


CONCLUSIONS
Both the image quality and patient entrance skin dose data suggest that the SSDR method is superior to the CR method for the lower extremity musculoskeletal examination.
Lee
Kwang Hwi
KH
Department of Radiology and Center for Imaging Science, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Kwon
Jong Won
JW
Yoon
Young Cheol
YC
Choi
Sang Hee
SH
Jung
Jee Young
JY
Kim
Ji Hye
JH
Lee
Sang Jun
SJ
D000293:Adolescent; D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D035002:Lower Extremity / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging*; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D011829:Radiation Dosage; D011856:Radiographic Image Enhancement / Q000379:methods; D014057:Tomography, X-Ray Computed / Q000379:methods; D055815:Young Adult