Differential outcomes enhance accuracy of delayed matching to sample but not resistance to change.
Three experiments assessed the relation between the differential outcomes effect and resistance to change of delayed matching-to-sample performance. Pigeons produced delayed matching-to-sample trials by responding on variable interval schedules in two components of a multiple schedule. In the same-outcome component, the probability of reinforcement was the same for both samples (.9 in Experiments 1 and 2, .5 in Experiment 3); in the different-outcomes component, the probability of reinforcement was .9 for one sample and .1 for the other. In all three experiments, the forgetting functions in the different-outcomes component were higher and shallower than in the same-outcomes component. When total reinforcement was greater in the same-outcomes component (Experiments 1 and 2), resistance to disruption by prefeeding, intercomponent food, extinction, or flashing lights typically was greater in that component. In Experiment 3, when total reinforcement was equated, resistance to disruption was similar across components. Thus, the level and slope of forgetting functions depended on differential reinforcement correlated with the samples, but the resistance to change of forgetting functions depended on total reinforcement in a component. Both aspects of the results can be explained by a model of delayed matching to sample performance.
Nevin
John A
JA
Department of Psychology, University of New Hampshire, NH, USA. jnevin@cisunix.unh.edu
Ward
Ryan D
RD
Jimenez-Gomez
Corina
C
Odum
Amy L
AL
Shahan
Timothy A
TA
D000818:Animals; D010856:Columbidae; D004777:Environment; D011939:Mental Recall; D011930:Reaction Time; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012153:Retention, Psychology