title: Radiologists' performance and their enjoyment of interpreting screening mammograms.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  One might speculate that radiologists who enjoy mammography may exhibit better performance than radiologists who do not.
  
  
  METHODS
  One hundred thirty-one radiologists at three Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC) registries completed a survey about their characteristics, clinical practices, and attitudes related to screening mammography. Survey results were linked with BCSC performance data for 662,084 screening and 33,977 diagnostic mammograms. Using logistic regression, we modeled the odds of an abnormal interpretation, cancer detection, sensitivity, and specificity among radiologists who reported they enjoy interpreting screening mammograms compared with those who do not.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Overall, 44.3% of radiologists reported not enjoying interpreting screening mammograms. Radiologists who reported enjoying interpreting screening mammograms were more likely to be women, spend at least 20% of their time in breast imaging, have a primary academic affiliation, read more than 2,000 mammograms per year, and be salaried. Enjoyment was not associated with screening mammography performance. Among diagnostic mammograms, there was a significant increase in sensitivity among radiologists who reported enjoyment (85.2%) compared with those who did not (78.2%). In models adjusting for radiologist characteristics, similar trends were found; however, no statistically significant associations remained.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Almost one half of radiologists actively interpreting mammograms do not enjoy that part of their job. Once we adjusted for radiologist and patient characteristics, we found that reported enjoyment was not related to performance in our study, although suggestive trends were noted.
authors.affiliation: Office of Health Promotion Research, Departments of Family Medicine and Radiology and the Vermont Cancer Center, University of Vermont, 1 S Prospect St., Rm. 4426, Burlington, VT 05401-3444.
authors.forename: Berta M
authors.initials: BM
authors.lastname: Geller
authors.forename: Erin J A
authors.initials: EJ
authors.lastname: Bowles
authors.forename: Hee Yon
authors.initials: HY
authors.lastname: Sohng
authors.forename: R James
authors.initials: RJ
authors.lastname: Brenner
authors.forename: Diana L
authors.initials: DL
authors.lastname: Miglioretti
authors.forename: Patricia A
authors.initials: PA
authors.lastname: Carney
authors.forename: Joann G
authors.initials: JG
authors.lastname: Elmore
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D001943:Breast Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging* / Q000453:epidemiology; D016009:Chi-Square Distribution; D002983:Clinical Competence; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007588:Job Satisfaction; D016015:Logistic Models; D008327:Mammography; D008875:Middle Aged; D010820:Physicians / Q000523:psychology*; D011159:Population Surveillance; D010818:Practice Patterns, Physicians' / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012042:Registries; D012680:Sensitivity and Specificity; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014481:United States / Q000453:epidemiology