title: After the gold rush? A systematic and critical review of general medical podcasts.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  Podcasts are increasingly used to enhance many forms of research communication and education. We set out to assess the extent of this podcast revolution by identifying and critically describing the content and quality of podcast services provided by leading general medical journals.
  
  
  METHODS
  Summary of general and internal medicine journal podcasts identified in April 2008 by means of web-searching, with a brief commentary on their content and quality.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Of the top 100 general medical and internal journals as ranked by impact factor only eight offer a regular podcast. The technical quality of most is of an acceptable but not of a high standard. The mode of delivery and resulting listening experience is variable with those utilizing an interview format more interesting to listen to than those reliant upon a single voice.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  General medical podcasts are potentially a valuable resource for providing a digestible overview of the latest research, and for providing an opportunity to dip into areas outside one's own core interests. Although they represent a novel use of technology for disseminating knowledge, uptake has been limited and the quality of the listening experience is variable.
authors.affiliation: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York York YO10 5DD. pmw7@york.ac.uk
authors.forename: Paul
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Wilson
authors.forename: Mark
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Petticrew
authors.forename: Alison
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Booth
mesh_terms: D015510:Clinical Medicine; D033181:Information Dissemination; D007388:Internal Medicine; D020407:Internet; D055811:Journal Impact Factor; D010506:Periodicals as Topic