Diagnosis of borderline personality disorder in China: current status and future directions.
This paper reviews the current status and future directions of borderline personality disorder (BPD) research in China. Although the committee of the third version of the Chinese Classification of Mental Disorders (CCMD-3) rejected BPD as a valid diagnostic category and instead adopted the term impulsive personality disorder (IPD), our literature review on personality disorders from 1979 to 2008 in China indicated that BPD was the most popular research topic among researchers and clinicians. Available empiric evidence on BPD in China provided preliminary support for the construct validity and clinical utility of BPD in clinical and nonclinical Chinese samples. Future studies in the following areas are suggested: 1) developing reliable assessment instruments for measuring BPD pathology in China, 2) comparing the construct validity and phenomenology of CCMD IPD and DSM BPD among Chinese patients, 3) examining potential cultural differences in symptom expression of BPD pathology among the Chinese, and 4) exploring indigenous and imported methods for treating BPD patients in China.
Zhong
Jie
J
Department of Psychology, Peking University, No. 5, Yi He Yuan Road, Hai Dian, Beijing 100871, People's Republic of China. jzhong@pku.edu.cn
Leung
Freedom
F
D001883:Borderline Personality Disorder / Q000145:classification / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000208:ethnology* / Q000628:therapy; D002681:China; D003431:Cross-Cultural Comparison; D003430:Cross-Sectional Studies; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D039721:Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders; D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D006801:Humans; D008516:Medicine, Chinese Traditional; D010552:Personality Assessment; D010554:Personality Disorders / Q000145:classification / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000208:ethnology