Ramifications of increased training in quantitative methodology.
Comments on the article "Doctoral training in statistics, measurement, and methodology in psychology: Replication and extension of Aiken, West, Sechrest, and Reno's (1990) survey of PhD programs in North America" by Aiken, West, and Millsap. The current author asks three questions that are provoked by the comprehensive identification of gaps and deficiencies in the training of quantitative methodology that led Aiken, West, and Millsap to call for expanded graduate instruction resources and programs. This comment calls for greater attention to how advances and expansion in the training of quantitative analysis are influencing who chooses to study psychology and how and what will be studied.
Zimiles
Herbert
H
Arizona State University, USA. zimiles@asu.edu
D003479:Curriculum; D003625:Data Collection / Q000379:methods / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D004503:Education, Medical, Graduate / Q000379:methods*; D006801:Humans; D011584:Psychology / Q000193:education* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data; D012107:Research Design / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D013223:Statistics as Topic / Q000193:education* / Q000379:methods