title: Comparison of 3 estimation methods of mycophenolic acid AUC based on a limited sampling strategy in renal transplant patients.
abstract: A significant relationship between mycophenolic acid (MPA) area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and the risk for rejection has been reported. Based on 3 concentration measurements, 3 approaches have been proposed for the estimation of MPA AUC, involving either a multilinear regression approach model (MLRA) or a Bayesian estimation using either gamma absorption or zero-order absorption population models. The aim of the study was to compare the 3 approaches for the estimation of MPA AUC in 150 renal transplant patients treated with mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus. The population parameters were determined in 77 patients (learning study). The AUC estimation methods were compared in the learning population and in 73 patients from another center (validation study). In the latter study, the reference AUCs were estimated by the trapezoidal rule on 8 measurements. MPA concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography. The gamma absorption model gave the best fit. In the learning study, the AUCs estimated by both Bayesian methods were very similar, whereas the multilinear approach was highly correlated but yielded estimates about 20% lower than Bayesian methods. This resulted in dosing recommendations differing by 250 mg/12 h or more in 27% of cases. In the validation study, AUC estimates based on the Bayesian method with gamma absorption model and multilinear regression approach model were, respectively, 12% higher and 7% lower than the reference values. To conclude, the bicompartmental model with gamma absorption rate gave the best fit. The 3 AUC estimation methods are highly correlated but not concordant. For a given patient, the same estimation method should always be used.
authors.affiliation: Laboratory of Pharmacology and Toxicology, UMR CNRS 7054, AP-HP, CHU Henri Mondor, Créteil, France.
authors.forename: Anne
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Hulin
authors.forename: Benoît
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Blanchet
authors.forename: Vincent
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Audard
authors.forename: Caroline
authors.initials: C
authors.lastname: Barau
authors.forename: Valérie
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Furlan
authors.forename: Antoine
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Durrbach
authors.forename: Fabrice
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Taïeb
authors.forename: Philippe
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Lang
authors.forename: Philippe
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Grimbert
authors.forename: Michel
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Tod
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D019540:Area Under Curve; D001499:Bayes Theorem; D016903:Drug Monitoring / Q000379:methods; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007166:Immunosuppressive Agents / Q000097:blood / Q000493:pharmacokinetics*; D016030:Kidney Transplantation; D008137:Longitudinal Studies; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009173:Mycophenolic Acid / Q000097:blood / Q000493:pharmacokinetics*; D012044:Regression Analysis; D015203:Reproducibility of Results
chemical_list: D007166:Immunosuppressive Agents; D009173:Mycophenolic Acid