Newborn screening in Victoria: a case study of tissue banking regulation.
The regulation of human tissue collections is increasingly important in maintaining public trust (and legitimacy) for critical practices and resources directed to public health programs and research. This article examines the governance arrangements applying to VCGS Ltd (under its various incarnations as "Genetic Health Services Victoria", "VCGS Pathology", and so on) and the existing collection of population-wide blood samples maintained on newborn screening cards (or Guthrie cards) in Victoria. The analyses reveal a complex web of regulations (and possibly even no regulation) and the limited role of significant statutory schemes that are generally assumed to apply to human tissue collections and the data and information derived from those materials. The article argues that, without a clear regulatory framework (and in particular meaningful consent), there is likely to be a decline in public trust (and legitimacy) with a consequent decreased participation in what is a public health program with immediate and quantifiable benefits and a valuable research resource for the future.
Lawson
Charles
C
Australian Centre for Intellectual Property in Agriculture, Griffith Law School, Griffith University, Queensland. c.lawson@griffith.edu.au
D005820:Genetic Testing / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D006801:Humans; D007231:Infant, Newborn; D015997:Neonatal Screening; D014015:Tissue Banks / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D014739:Victoria