title: The four diagnostic criteria for Restless Legs Syndrome are unable to exclude confounding conditions ("mimics").
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Epidemiological survey studies have suggested that a large fraction of the adult population, from five to more than 10%, have symptoms of Restless Legs Syndrome (RLS). Recently, however, it has become clear that the positive predictive value of many questionnaire screens for RLS may be fairly low and that many individuals who are identified by these screens have other conditions that can "mimic" the features of RLS by satisfying the four diagnostic criteria. We noted the presence of such confounders in a case-control family study and sought to develop methods to differentiate them from true RLS.
  
  
  METHODS
  Family members from the case-control study were interviewed blindly by an RLS expert using the validated Hopkins telephone diagnostic interview (HTDI). Besides questions on the four key diagnostic features of RLS, the HTDI contains open-ended questions on symptom quality and relief strategies and other questions to probe the character of provocative situations and modes of relief. Based on the entire HDTI, a diagnosis of definite, probable or possible RLS or Not-RLS was made.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Out of 1255 family members contacted, we diagnosed 1232: 402 (32.0%) had definite or probable RLS, 42 (3.3%) possible RLS, and 788 (62.8%) Not-RLS. Of the 788 family members who were determined not to have RLS, 126 could satisfy all four diagnostic criteria (16%). This finding indicates that the specificity of the four criteria was only 84%. Those with mimic conditions were found to have atypical presentations whose features could be used to assist in final diagnosis.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  A variety of conditions, including cramps, positional discomfort, and local leg pathology can satisfy all four diagnostic criteria for RLS and thereby "mimic" RLS by satisfying the four diagnostic criteria. Definitive diagnosis of RLS, therefore, requires exclusion of these other conditions, which may be more common in the population than true RLS. Short of an extended clinical interview and workup, certain features of presentation help differentiate mimics from true RLS.
authors.affiliation: UMDNJ-RW Johnson Medical Center, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
authors.forename: Wayne A
authors.initials: WA
authors.lastname: Hening
authors.forename: Richard P
authors.initials: RP
authors.lastname: Allen
authors.forename: Mystinna
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Washburn
authors.forename: Suzanne R
authors.initials: SR
authors.lastname: Lesage
authors.forename: Christopher J
authors.initials: CJ
authors.lastname: Earley
mesh_terms: D016022:Case-Control Studies; D003937:Diagnosis, Differential; D005189:False Positive Reactions; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009043:Motor Activity; D011187:Posture; D011237:Predictive Value of Tests; D012146:Rest; D012148:Restless Legs Syndrome / Q000150:complications* / Q000175:diagnosis* / Q000503:physiopathology; D012307:Risk Factors; D012890:Sleep; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires