title: Are we satisfied with the way we review an article?
abstract: Nurses and other healthcare professionals must read professional journals on a regular basis to provide evidence-based care. Because authors often provide little detail on their methodology, it may be difficult to determine whether we should incorporate the conclusions of a study into our clinical practice. In addition, authors and readers may have a limited understanding of statistical analysis. This article gives a brief overview of how to evaluate a manuscript and some basic statistical measures that can be used to evaluate a research study.
authors.affiliation: Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. muhammad.aslam@childrens.harvard.edu
authors.forename: Muhammad
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Aslam
authors.forename: Heather H
authors.initials: HH
authors.lastname: Burris
authors.forename: John A F
authors.initials: JA
authors.lastname: Zupancic
mesh_terms: D016001:Confidence Intervals; D003627:Data Interpretation, Statistical; D004059:Diffusion of Innovation; D055318:Evidence-Based Nursing; D006801:Humans; D017283:Neonatal Nursing; D015399:Nursing Research / Q000379:methods / Q000592:standards; D016017:Odds Ratio; D017063:Outcome Assessment, Health Care; D017712:Peer Review, Research; D010506:Periodicals as Topic; D011897:Random Allocation; D015203:Reproducibility of Results; D012107:Research Design / Q000592:standards*; D012306:Risk; D018401:Sample Size