Determination of acetaldehyde in ambient air: comparison of thermal desorption-GC/FID method with the standard DNPH-HPLC method.
In this work, the experimental compatibility between the standard DNPH-HPLC method and the gas chromatographic (GC) method (without any derivatization) was investigated for the analysis of atmospheric carbonyls. In the latter case, GC analysis was made based on adsorptive enrichment on solid sorbents followed by thermal desorption. For a comparative analysis between the two methods, we quantified the concentration levels of acetaldehyde from gaseous combustion samples of different charcoal products. The acetaldehyde concentration data, measured by the HPLC method (643 +/- 1,689 ppb), were approximately 10% lower than the GC-based method (722 +/- 1,788 ppb). As such, the differences in the measured concentrations were statistically insignificant. Although the percentage difference of the two methods fell within a relatively wide range, the results obtained by the GC-based method were comparable to those of the HPLC method with significantly strong correlations. The GC-based method, if tested for certain carbonyl species such as acetaldehyde, appeared to be a suitable alternative for the HPLC method.
Kim
Ki-Hyun
KH
Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Atmospheric Environment Laboratory, Sejong University, Seoul, Korea, 143 747. khkim@sejong.ac.kr
Pal
Raktim
R
D000079:Acetaldehyde / Q000032:analysis*; D000393:Air Pollutants / Q000032:analysis*; D002849:Chromatography, Gas / Q000379:methods*; D002851:Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid / Q000379:methods*; D004784:Environmental Monitoring / Q000379:methods
D000393:Air Pollutants; D000079:Acetaldehyde