Bioethics policies and the compass of common morality.
Even if there is a common morality, many would argue that it provides little guidance in resolving moral disputes, because universally accepted norms are both general in content and few in number. However, if we supplement common morality with commonly accepted factual beliefs and culture-specific norms and utilize coherentist reasoning, we can limit the range of acceptable answers to disputed issues. Moreover, in the arena of public policy, where one must take into account both legal and moral norms, the constraints on acceptable answers will narrow the extent of reasonable disagreement even further. A consideration of the debate over legalization of assisted dying supports this claim.
Lindsay
Ronald A
RA
Center for Inquiry, Amherst, NY 14226, USA. rlindsay@centerforinquiry.net
D026688:Bioethical Issues; D001675:Bioethics / Q000639:trends*; D003466:Cultural Characteristics; D018864:Cultural Diversity; D006801:Humans; D028681:Moral Obligations; D009014:Morals; D009922:Oregon; D011050:Policy Making; D011640:Public Policy; D012297:Right to Die / Q000941:ethics / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence*; D012935:Social Justice; D017236:Suicide, Assisted / Q000941:ethics* / Q000331:legislation & jurisprudence; D014481:United States