title: Do people match surface reflectance fundamentally differently than they match emitted light?
abstract: We compared matches between colours that were both presented on a computer monitor or both as pieces of paper, with matching the colour of a piece of paper with a colour presented on a computer monitor and vice versa. Performance was specifically poor when setting an image on a computer monitor to match the colour of a piece of paper. This cannot be due to any of the individual judgments because subjects readily selected a matching piece of paper to match another piece of paper and set the image on the monitor to match another image on a monitor. We propose that matching the light reaching the eye and matching surface reflectance are fundamentally different judgments and that subjects can sometimes but not always choose which to match.
authors.affiliation: Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. j_granzier@hotmail.com
authors.forename: Jeroen J M
authors.initials: JJ
authors.lastname: Granzier
authors.forename: Eli
authors.initials: E
authors.lastname: Brenner
authors.forename: Jeroen B J
authors.initials: JB
authors.lastname: Smeets
mesh_terms: D003118:Color Perception / Q000502:physiology*; D016287:Computer Peripherals; D006801:Humans; D010775:Photic Stimulation / Q000379:methods; D011601:Psychophysics; D012542:Scattering, Radiation