title: Replicating Milgram: Would people still obey today?
abstract: The author conducted a partial replication of Stanley Milgram's (1963, 1965, 1974) obedience studies that allowed for useful comparisons with the original investigations while protecting the well-being of participants. Seventy adults participated in a replication of Milgram's Experiment 5 up to the point at which they first heard the learner's verbal protest (150 volts). Because 79% of Milgram's participants who went past this point continued to the end of the shock generator's range, reasonable estimates could be made about what the present participants would have done if allowed to continue. Obedience rates in the 2006 replication were only slightly lower than those Milgram found 45 years earlier. Contrary to expectation, participants who saw a confederate refuse the experimenter's instructions obeyed as often as those who saw no model. Men and women did not differ in their rates of obedience, but there was some evidence that individual differences in empathic concern and desire for control affected participants' responses.
authors.affiliation: Deparment of Psychology, Santa Clara University, CA 95053-0001, USA. jburger@scu.edu
authors.forename: Jerry M
authors.initials: JM
authors.lastname: Burger
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D035841:Behavioral Research / Q000941:ethics / Q000379:methods* / Q000706:statistics & numerical data*; D004291:Dominance-Subordination; D004645:Empathy; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D010551:Personality; D011678:Punishment / Q000523:psychology*; D035842:Research Subjects / Q000523:psychology*; D017678:Sex Distribution; D055815:Young Adult