Despotism, democracy, and the evolutionary dynamics of leadership and followership.
Responds to comments made by George B. Graen and Stephen J. Guastello on the current author's article Leadership, followership, and evolution: Some lessons from the past by Van Vugt, Hogan, and Kaiser. In the original article my co-authors and I proposed a new way of thinking about leadership, informed by evolutionary (neo-Darwinian) theory. In the first commentary, Graen noted that we ignored a number of recently developed psychological theories of leadership that take into account the leader-follower relationship, most notably LMX theory. LMX theory asserts that leadership effectiveness and team performance are affected by the quality of working relationships between superior and subordinates. Because the original article primarily dealt with questions about the origins of leadership--the phylogenetic and evolutionary causes--we had to be concise in our review of proximate psychological theories of leadership. In the second commentary, Guastello concurred with the importance of an evolutionary game analysis for studying leadership but disagreed with certain details of our analysis. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2009 APA, all rights reserved).
Van Vugt
Mark
M
Department of Psychology, University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom. mvv@kent.ac.uk
D005075:Biological Evolution; D003709:Democracy; D006126:Group Processes; D006801:Humans; D007398:Interpersonal Relations; D007857:Leadership; D011582:Psychological Theory; D012919:Social Behavior