The role of smoking and diet in explaining educational inequalities in lung cancer incidence.
BACKGROUND
Studies in many countries have reported higher lung cancer incidence and mortality in individuals with lower socioeconomic status.


METHODS
To investigate the role of smoking in these inequalities, we used data from 391,251 participants in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition study, a cohort of individuals in 10 European countries. We collected information on smoking (history and quantity), fruit and vegetable consumption, and education through questionnaires at study entry and gathered data on lung cancer incidence for a mean of 8.4 years. Socioeconomic status was defined as the highest attained level of education, and participants were grouped by sex and region of residence (Northern Europe, Germany, or Southern Europe). Relative indices of inequality (RIIs) of lung cancer risk unadjusted and adjusted for smoking were estimated using Cox regression models. Additional analyses were performed by histological type.


RESULTS
During the study period, 939 men and 692 women developed lung cancer. Inequalities in lung cancer risk (RII(men) = 3.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.77 to 4.73, 117 vs 52 per 100,000 person-years for lowest vs highest education level; RII(women) = 2.39, 95% CI = 1.77 to 3.21, 46 vs 25 per 100,000 person-years) decreased after adjustment for smoking but remained statistically significant (RII(men) = 2.29, 95% CI = 1.75 to 3.01; RII(women) = 1.59, 95% CI = 1.18 to 2.13). Large RIIs were observed among men and women in Northern European countries and among men in Germany, but inequalities in lung cancer risk were reverse (RIIs < 1) among women in Southern European countries. Inequalities differed by histological type. Adjustment for smoking reduced inequalities similarly for all histological types and among men and women in all regions. In all analysis, further adjustment for fruit and vegetable consumption did not change the estimates.


CONCLUSIONS
Self-reported smoking consistently explains approximately 50% of the inequalities in lung cancer risk due to differences in education.
Menvielle
Gwenn
G
The National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands. gwenn.menvielle@inserm.fr
Boshuizen
Hendriek
H
Kunst
Anton E
AE
Dalton
Susanne O
SO
Vineis
Paolo
P
Bergmann
Manuela M
MM
Hermann
Silke
S
Ferrari
Pietro
P
Raaschou-Nielsen
Ole
O
Tjønneland
Anne
A
Kaaks
Rudolf
R
Linseisen
Jakob
J
Kosti
Maria
M
Trichopoulou
Antonia
A
Dilis
Vardis
V
Palli
Domenico
D
Krogh
Vittorio
V
Panico
Salvatore
S
Tumino
Rosario
R
Büchner
Frederike L
FL
van Gils
Carla H
CH
Peeters
Petra H M
PH
Braaten
Tonje
T
Gram
Inger T
IT
Lund
Eiliv
E
Rodriguez
Laudina
L
Agudo
Antonio
A
Sánchez
Maria-José
MJ
Tormo
Maria-José
MJ
Ardanaz
Eva
E
Manjer
Jonas
J
Wirfält
Elisabet
E
Hallmans
Göran
G
Rasmuson
Torgny
T
Bingham
Sheila
S
Khaw
Kay-Tee
KT
Allen
Naomi
N
Key
Tim
T
Boffetta
Paolo
P
Duell
Eric J
EJ
Slimani
Nadia
N
Gallo
Valentina
V
Riboli
Elio
E
Bueno-de-Mesquita
H Bas
HB
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D015986:Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic; D004522:Educational Status; D005060:Europe / Q000453:epidemiology; D005247:Feeding Behavior; D005260:Female; D005638:Fruit; D006801:Humans; D015994:Incidence; D008175:Lung Neoplasms / Q000453:epidemiology* / Q000209:etiology* / Q000473:pathology; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D016017:Odds Ratio; D016016:Proportional Hazards Models; D011446:Prospective Studies; D018570:Risk Assessment; D012307:Risk Factors; D012737:Sex Factors; D012907:Smoking / Q000009:adverse effects* / Q000453:epidemiology*; D012923:Social Class; D011795:Surveys and Questionnaires; D014675:Vegetables