title: Surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer: role of peritoneal carcinomatosis: exploratory analysis of the DESKTOP I Trial about risk factors, surgical implications, and prognostic value of peritoneal carcinomatosis.
abstract: BACKGROUND
  Almost all retrospective trials pointed out that a benefit of surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer may be limited to patients in whom a macroscopic complete resection could be achieved. Peritoneal carcinomatosis has been reported to be either a negative predictor for resectability or a negative prognostic factor, or both. The role of peritoneal carcinomatosis in a multicenter trial was investigated.
  
  
  METHODS
  Exploratory analysis of the DESKTOP I trial (multicenter trial of patients undergoing surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer, 2000 to 2003).
  
  
  RESULTS
  A total of 125 patients (50%) who underwent surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer had peritoneal carcinomatosis. Univariate analyses showed worse overall survival for patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis compared with patients without carcinomatosis (P < .0001). Patients with and without peritoneal carcinomatosis had a complete resection rate of 26% and 74%, respectively (P < .0001). This corresponded with the observation that patients with complete resection had a better prognosis than those with minimal residual disease of 1 to 5 mm, which commonly reflects peritoneal carcinomatosis (P = .0002). However, patients who underwent complete resection, despite peritoneal carcinomatosis, had a 2-year survival rate of 77%, which was similar to the 2-year survival rate of patients with completely debulked disease who did not have peritoneal carcinomatosis (81%) (P = .96). Analysis of prognostic factors did not show any independent effect of peritoneal carcinomatosis on survival in patients who underwent complete resection.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Peritoneal carcinomatosis was a negative predictor for complete resection but had no effect on prognosis if complete resection could be achieved. Improving surgical skills might be one step to increase the proportion of patients who might benefit from surgery for recurrent disease.
authors.affiliation: Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, HSK, Dr Horst Schmidt Klinik, Wiesbaden, Germany. p.harter@gmx.de
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Harter
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Hahmann
authors.forename: H J
authors.initials: HJ
authors.lastname: Lueck
authors.forename: M
authors.initials: M
authors.lastname: Poelcher
authors.forename: P
authors.initials: P
authors.lastname: Wimberger
authors.forename: O
authors.initials: O
authors.lastname: Ortmann
authors.forename: U
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Canzler
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Richter
authors.forename: U
authors.initials: U
authors.lastname: Wagner
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Hasenburg
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: Burges
authors.forename: S
authors.initials: S
authors.lastname: Loibl
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Meier
authors.forename: J
authors.initials: J
authors.lastname: Huober
authors.forename: D
authors.initials: D
authors.lastname: Fink
authors.forename: W
authors.initials: W
authors.lastname: Schroeder
authors.forename: K
authors.initials: K
authors.lastname: Muenstedt
authors.forename: B
authors.initials: B
authors.lastname: Schmalfeldt
authors.forename: G
authors.initials: G
authors.lastname: Emons
authors.forename: A
authors.initials: A
authors.lastname: du Bois
mesh_terms: D019992:Databases as Topic; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D008875:Middle Aged; D009364:Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / Q000401:mortality / Q000601:surgery*; D010051:Ovarian Neoplasms / Q000401:mortality / Q000473:pathology / Q000601:surgery*; D010534:Peritoneal Neoplasms / Q000401:mortality / Q000556:secondary / Q000601:surgery*; D011379:Prognosis; D012307:Risk Factors