Facial and prosodic affect recognition among pedophilic and nonpedophilic criminal child molesters.
The present study compared facial and prosodic affect recognition abilities among pedophilic and nonpedophilic child molesters and community-dwelling controls. Pedophilic child molesters are characterized by primary sexual interest in prepubescent children, whereas nonpedophilic child molesters are characterized by offending against children despite being primarily sexually attracted to adults. The results showed that nonpedophilic child molesters made more errors in recognizing both facial and prosodic affect, performing more poorly than both controls and pedophilic child molesters. These findings are consistent with greater psychopathic tendencies among nonpedophilic molesters as well as with prior findings of smaller amygdala volume among child molesters.
Suchy
Yana
Y
University of Utah, Department of Psychology, Salt Lake City, UT 84112-0251, USA. yana.suchy@psych.utah.edu
Whittaker
Wilson J
WJ
Strassberg
Donald S
DS
Eastvold
Angela
A
D000328:Adult; D002648:Child; D002650:Child Abuse, Sexual / Q000523:psychology*; D003071:Cognition / Q000502:physiology; D003463:Cues; D005145:Face; D005149:Facial Expression; D006801:Humans; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009483:Neuropsychological Tests; D010378:Pedophilia / Q000523:psychology*; D011329:Prisoners / Q000523:psychology*; D021641:Recognition, Psychology; D012649:Self Concept; D012919:Social Behavior; D014796:Visual Perception; D055815:Young Adult