Exposure to allergens of different cattle breeds and their relevance in occupational allergy.
BACKGROUND
Cattle are an important source of allergens in the working area of farmers. Asthma caused by cow allergens is a significant occupational problem. Yet in allergological testing, the results of in vivo and in vitro diagnostic tests are often inconsistent even in cases with clearly cattle-related symptoms.


OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to investigate four different commercial cow allergen extracts and to compare them with self prepared extracts of different cattle breeds by means of SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting using the sera of 42 German farmers with asthma and rhino-conjunctivitis caused by cattle contact.


RESULTS
The commercial extracts investigated in this study showed only minor differences in protein pattern. Using sera in immunoblotting experiments distinct bands were found for all symptomatic farmers, even in 13 farmers with a negative result in commercially available serological allergy tests. Bands with molecular weights in the range between about 11 and 67 kDa were observed; reactivity with the major allergen Bos d 2 at about 20 kDa was detected in all farmers, although it was not the strongest band in all cases.


CONCLUSIONS
We demonstrate for the first time the allergenic relevance of additional proteins with molecular weights of 14, 30, 55 and approx. 67-97 kDa in more than 50% of farmers with cattle related symptoms. One of our most striking results was that 32% of the investigated farmers with cattle related symptoms showed negative results with commercial serological tests but distinct reactions with cow allergen in immunoblotting experiments. The Bos d 2 content in hair showed differences between certain breeds whereas German Brown and Simmental had particularly higher quantities of Bos d 2 in their hair than breeds such as Holstein-Friesian. These results strongly support the following recommendation: test results with commercial extracts that are contradictory to the clinical symptoms should be supplemented by skin tests using extracts of the hair of the farmers' own cattle.
Heutelbeck
Astrid R R
AR
Department of Occupational Health, Georg-August-University, Waldweg 37, Göttingen, Germany. aheutel@gwdg.de
Junghans
Carsten
C
Esselmann
Hermann
H
Hallier
Ernst
E
Schulz
Thomas G
TG
D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000485:Allergens / Q000276:immunology / Q000302:isolation & purification*; D000818:Animals; D000829:Animals, Domestic / Q000276:immunology*; D052179:Antigens, Plant / Q000276:immunology; D001249:Asthma / Q000276:immunology; D002417:Cattle / Q000276:immunology*; D015331:Cohort Studies; D003233:Conjunctivitis, Allergic / Q000209:etiology / Q000276:immunology; D004591:Electrophoresis, Polyacrylamide Gel; D005260:Female; D005858:Germany; D006801:Humans; D006967:Hypersensitivity / Q000276:immunology*; D015151:Immunoblotting; D007073:Immunoglobulin E / Q000032:analysis / Q000276:immunology; D008297:Male; D008875:Middle Aged; D009784:Occupational Diseases / Q000209:etiology* / Q000276:immunology*; D016273:Occupational Exposure / Q000009:adverse effects; D012871:Skin Diseases / Q000276:immunology; D012882:Skin Tests; D013045:Species Specificity
D000485:Allergens; D052179:Antigens, Plant; C113339:Bos d 2 allergen; D007073:Immunoglobulin E