The hermeneutic challenge of genetic engineering: Habermas and the transhumanists.
The purpose of this paper is to explore the impact that developments in transhumanist technologies may have upon human cultures (and thus upon the lifeworld), and to do so by exploring a potential debate between Habermas and the transhumanists. Transhumanists, such as Nick Bostrom, typically see the potential in genetic and other technologies for positively expanding and transcending human nature. In contrast, Habermas is a representative of those who are fearful of this technology, suggesting that it will compound the deleterious effects of the colonisation of the lifeworld, further constraining human autonomy and undermining the meaningfulness of the lifeworld by expanding the technological control and manipulation of humanity. It will be argued that these opposed positions are grounded in fundamentally different understandings of the consequences of scientific and technological advance. On one level, the transhumanists remain confident that the lifeworld has within it the resources necessary to find meaning and purpose in a society deeply infused by genetic technology. Habermas disagrees. On another level, the difference is articulated by Horkheimer and Adorno in Dialectic of Enlightenment, primarily by challenging what may be understood as a Baconian faith in science as a project for the domination of nature (where nature is an infinitely malleable material, to be dominated and shaped, without adverse consequences, purely for the purposes of human survival). While the transhumanists broadly embrace this faith, Habermas returns to something akin to Horkheimer and Adorno's pessimistic scepticism.
Edgar
Andrew
A
Centre for Applied Ethics, Cardiff University, Colum Drive, Cardiff, Wales, UK. edgar@cf.ac.uk
D001675:Bioethics; D020811:Biomedical Technology / Q000941:ethics*; D034462:Dissent and Disputes; D028663:Ethical Theory; D005053:Eugenics; D024861:Genetic Enhancement / Q000941:ethics*; D040821:Human Characteristics; D006808:Humanism; D006801:Humans; D010686:Philosophy, Medical; D011582:Psychological Theory; D012945:Social Values; D026712:Value of Life