Comparison of IPSM 1990 photon dosimetry code of practice with IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51.
Several codes of practice for photon dosimetry are currently used around the world, supported by different organizations. A comparison of IPSM 1990 with both IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 has been performed. All three protocols are based on the calibration of ionization chambers in terms of standards of absorbed dose to water, as it is the case with other modern codes of practice. This comparison has been carried out for photon beams of nominal energies: 4 MV, 6 MV, 8 MV, 10 MV and 18 MV. An NE 2571 graphite ionization chamber was used in this study, cross-calibrated against an NE 2611A Secondary Standard, calibrated in the National Physical Laboratory (NPL). Absolute dose in reference conditions was obtained using each of these three protocols including: beam quality indices, beam quality conversion factors both theoretical and NPL experimental ones, correction factors for influence quantities and absolute dose measurements. Each protocol recommendations have been strictly followed. Uncertainties have been obtained according to the ISO Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement. Absorbed dose obtained according to all three protocols agree within experimental uncertainty. The largest difference between absolute dose results for two protocols is obtained for the highest energy: 0.7% between IPSM 1990 and IAEA TRS-398 using theoretical beam quality conversion factors.
Castrillón
Silvia Vargas
SV
NW Medical Physics, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Henríquez
Francisco Cutanda
FC
NW Medical Physics, Christie Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
D002138:Calibration / Q000592:standards; D002985:Clinical Protocols; D017785:Photons; D011834:Radiation Monitoring; D011879:Radiotherapy Dosage / Q000592:standards*; D011882:Radiotherapy, High-Energy / Q000295:instrumentation* / Q000379:methods; D012015:Reference Standards