title: Sentinel lymph node mapping for grade 1 endometrial cancer: is it the answer to the surgical staging dilemma?
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  To describe the accuracy of SLN mapping in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of grade 1 endometrial cancer.
  
  
  METHODS
  A prospective, non-randomized study of women with a preoperative diagnosis of endometrial cancer and clinical stage I disease was conducted. A subset analysis of patients with a preoperative diagnosis of grade 1 endometrial endometrioid cancer was performed. All patients had preoperative lymphoscintigraphy with Tc99m on the day of or day before surgery followed by an intraoperative injection of 2 cm(3) of isosulfan or methylene blue dye deep into the cervix or both cervix and fundus. All patients underwent hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and regional nodal dissection. Hot and/or blue nodes were labeled as SLNs and sent for histopathological analysis.
  
  
  RESULTS
  Forty-two patients with a preoperative diagnosis of grade 1 endometrial carcinoma treated from 3/06 to 8/08 were identified. Twenty-five (60%) had laparoscopic surgery; 17 (40%) were treated by laparotomy. Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy visualized SLNs in 30 patients (71%); intraoperative localization of the SLN was possible in 36 patients (86%). A median of 3 SLNs (range, 1-14) and 14.5 non-SLNs (range, 4-55) were examined. In all, 4/36 (11%) had positive SLNs-3 seen on H&E and 1 as cytokeratin-positive cells on IHC. All node-positive cases were picked up by the SLN; there were no false-negative cases. The sensitivity of the SLN procedure in the 36 patients who had an SLN identified was 100%.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  Sentinel lymph node mapping using a cervical injection with combined Tc and blue dye is feasible and accurate in patients with grade 1 endometrial cancer and may be a reasonable option for this select group of patients. Regional lymphadenectomy remains the gold standard in many practices, particularly for the approximately 15% of cases with failed SLN mapping.
authors.affiliation: Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. Abu-rusn@mskcc.org
authors.forename: Nadeem R
authors.initials: NR
authors.lastname: Abu-Rustum
authors.forename: Fady
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Khoury-Collado
authors.forename: Neeta
authors.initials: N
authors.lastname: Pandit-Taskar
authors.forename: Robert A
authors.initials: RA
authors.lastname: Soslow
authors.forename: Fanny
authors.initials: F
authors.lastname: Dao
authors.forename: Yukio
authors.initials: Y
authors.lastname: Sonoda
authors.forename: Douglas A
authors.initials: DA
authors.lastname: Levine
authors.forename: Carol L
authors.initials: CL
authors.lastname: Brown
authors.forename: Dennis S
authors.initials: DS
authors.lastname: Chi
authors.forename: Richard R
authors.initials: RR
authors.lastname: Barakat
authors.forename: Mary L
authors.initials: ML
authors.lastname: Gemignani
mesh_terms: D000328:Adult; D000368:Aged; D000369:Aged, 80 and over; D016889:Endometrial Neoplasms / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery; D005260:Female; D006801:Humans; D007044:Hysterectomy; D007430:Intraoperative Care / Q000379:methods; D008197:Lymph Node Excision; D008198:Lymph Nodes / Q000000981:diagnostic imaging / Q000473:pathology* / Q000601:surgery; D008207:Lymphatic Metastasis; D008751:Methylene Blue; D008875:Middle Aged; D009367:Neoplasm Staging; D011446:Prospective Studies; D011877:Radionuclide Imaging; D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals; D012394:Rosaniline Dyes; D021701:Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy / Q000379:methods*; D013671:Technetium Tc 99m Sulfur Colloid
chemical_list: D019275:Radiopharmaceuticals; D012394:Rosaniline Dyes; C025484:iso-sulfan blue; D013671:Technetium Tc 99m Sulfur Colloid; D008751:Methylene Blue