title: Intrauterine growth restriction: comparison of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists practice bulletin with other national guidelines.
abstract: OBJECTIVE
  The objective of the study was to compare national guidelines regarding small for gestational age (SGA).
  
  
  METHODS
  Along with American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) practice bulletin on abnormal growth, guidelines from England, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand were reviewed.
  
  
  RESULTS
  There are no guidelines on SGA from Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) guideline agrees with ACOG's definition of abnormal growth, but there are noticeable variances in the diagnosis and management of SGA. RCOG has more recommendations than ACOG (18 vs 4, respectively). The articles referenced varied, with only 13 similar articles being cited by the both committees.
  
  
  CONCLUSIONS
  The differences in the 2 guidelines suggest that there is variance in how 2 committees synthesize the literature and issue recommendations.
authors.affiliation: Aurora Health Care, Milwaukee, WI.
authors.forename: Suneet P
authors.initials: SP
authors.lastname: Chauhan
authors.forename: Lata M
authors.initials: LM
authors.lastname: Gupta
authors.forename: Nancy W
authors.initials: NW
authors.lastname: Hendrix
authors.forename: Vincenzo
authors.initials: V
authors.lastname: Berghella
mesh_terms: D001315:Australia; D002170:Canada; D004739:England; D005317:Fetal Growth Retardation / Q000175:diagnosis / Q000628:therapy; D006801:Humans; D009520:New Zealand; D014481:United States